Evaluation of Efficacy and Human Health Risk of Aerial

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluation of Efficacy and Human Health Risk of Aerial Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 26(1):57–66, 2010 Copyright E 2010 by The American Mosquito Control Association, Inc. EVALUATION OF EFFICACY AND HUMAN HEALTH RISK OF AERIAL ULTRA-LOW VOLUME APPLICATIONS OF PYRETHRINS AND PIPERONYL BUTOXIDE FOR ADULT MOSQUITO MANAGEMENT IN RESPONSE TO WEST NILE VIRUS ACTIVITY IN SACRAMENTO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA PAULA A. MACEDO,1 JEROME J. SCHLEIER III,2 MARCIA REED,1 KARA KELLEY,1 GARY W. GOODMAN,1 DAVID A. BROWN1 AND ROBERT K. D. PETERSON2 ABSTRACT. The Sacramento and Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District (SYMVCD, also referred to as ‘‘the District’’) conducts surveillance and management of mosquitoes in Sacramento and Yolo counties in California. Following an increase in numbers and West Nile virus (WNV) infection rates of Culex tarsalis and Culex pipiens, the District decided on July 26, 2007, to conduct aerial applications of EvergreenH EC 60-6 (60% pyrethrins: 6% piperonyl butoxide) over approximately 215 km2 in the north area of Sacramento County on the nights of July 30, July 31, and August 1, 2007. At the same time, the District received notification of the first human WNV case in the area. To evaluate the efficacy of the applications in decreasing mosquito abundance and infection rates, we conducted pre- and post-trapping inside and outside the spray zone and assessed human health risks from exposure to the insecticide applications. Results showed a significant decrease in abundance of both Cx. tarsalis and Cx. pipiens, and in the minimum infection rate of Cx. tarsalis. Human-health risks from exposure to the insecticide were below thresholds set by the US Environmental Protection Agency. KEY WORDS West Nile virus, aerial spraying, insecticide, mosquito control, risk assessment INTRODUCTION intensive larviciding and public education efforts, the District intervened by aerially applying a West Nile virus (WNV, family Flaviridae, formulation of pyrethrins and piperonyl butoxide genus Flavivirus) was first detected in the United (PBO) over an urban/suburban area in Sacra- States in 1999 in New York City, and reached mento County (Elnaiem et al. 2008), which most California in the summer of 2003 (Reisen et al. likely interrupted the WNV transmission cycle 2004). In 2004, WNV amplified to epidemic levels (Carney et al. 2008). and dispersed to all 58 counties in the state, and Although traditionally used in response to was associated with low-level transmission to humans and horses in Sacramento and Yolo epidemics and as part of a sustainable public counties that year (Armijos et al. 2005, Hom et al. health program (Rose 2001), the application of 2005). In 2005, there was a severe outbreak in pesticides often generates public concerns and Sacramento County, with 177 human cases and controversy about the safety of these chemicals to 40 equine cases (Elnaiem et al. 2006). people and the environment as well as the efficacy The Sacramento and Yolo Mosquito and of such practice (Thier 2001, Roche 2002, Hodge Vector Control District (SYMVCD, also referred and O’Connell 2005). A human health risk to as ‘‘the District’’) conducts routine surveillance assessment conducted by Peterson et al. (2006) and management of mosquito populations in for truck-mounted ultra-low volume (ULV) Sacramento and Yolo counties. The District applications of adulticides commonly used in monitors weekly mosquito abundance and West mosquito management programs determined Nile, western equine encephalitis (WEE), and St. risks to be below levels established by the US Louis encephalitis (SLE) viral infection. The Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), District follows the California Mosquito-Borne which agrees with the current scientific weight Virus Surveillance and Response Plan (Kramer of evidence (NYCDOH 2001, Karpati et al. 2004, 2005) and its own Mosquito and Mosquito-Borne Currier et al. 2005, O’Sullivan et al. 2005). The Disease Management Plan (SYMVCD 2005), and results from Peterson et al. (2006) indicated that applies the principles of integrated pest manage- potential health risks from WNV exceed risks ment (IPM) in its program. When WNV reached from exposure to these pesticides when used at epidemic levels in 2005 despite SYMVCD’s label rates to control adult mosquitoes. Their study used extremely conservative assumptions and estimated exposure after truck-mounted 1 Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District, 8631 Bond Road, Elk Grove, CA 95757. ULV applications as a worse-case scenario, used 2 Department of Land Resources and Environmental application rates greater than the ones used by Sciences, Montana State University, 334 Leon Johnson SYMVCD, and therefore likely overestimated the Hall, Bozeman, MT 59717. exposure that would be seen for the application 57 58 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MOSQUITO CONTROL ASSOCIATION VOL.26,NO.1 by the District. Schleier et al. (2009b) evaluated Mosquito-Borne Virus Surveillance and Re- probabilistically the deterministic risk estimates sponse Plan (Kramer 2005) and its Mosquito presented by Peterson et al. (2006) and found and Mosquito-Borne Disease Management Plan them to be very conservative. Davis et al. (2007) (SYMVCD 2005), the District made the decision evaluated ecological risks posed by adult mos- on July 26, 2007, to aerially apply pyrethrins and quito management programs and concluded that PBO (Evergreen EC-60-6H) over the area of risks to nontarget organisms from pesticides concern. On the same day that this decision was applied for adult mosquito management are low made, the District received notification of the first and not likely to exceed regulatory levels of human case in the area. The insecticide applica- concern. tions took place on the nights of July 30 and 31, Although vector control strategies and their and August 1, 2007. The objectives of this study effectiveness have generated concern in past were to 1) evaluate the efficacy of the aerial years, there have been few published studies applications in reducing adult mosquito popula- addressing the efficacy of these operations in tions and infection rates of the two main species reducing mosquito populations, infection rates, implicated in WNV transmission in Sacramento and virus transmission. Sacramento County County and 2) assess human health risks for the experienced a WNV epidemic for the first time aerial application of adulticide conducted in in 2005. Although the evaluation of the aerial Sacramento County in 2007 in response to the adulticiding conducted during that year suggested WNV activity. interruption of transmission (Carney et al. 2008) and reduction of vector abundance (Elnaiem et al. 2008), some uncertainties were identified by MATERIALS AND METHODS SYMVCD staff to be addressed in future Aerial applications and study area evaluations, particularly the absence of fixed 2 locations for trapping mosquitoes before and The spray zone was a 215 km area in northern after the applications, the small number of Sacramento County, located in the Central Valley mosquito pools collected from those areas, and of California (Fig. 1). The insecticide Evergreen other confounding factors such as the effect of EC 60-6 (60% PBO and 6% pyrethins; McLaugh- wind shadow at some of the locations. lin Gormley King, Golden Valley, MN) was In 2006, WNV reached epidemic levels in the applied by a fixed-wing Piper Aztec and a Cessna cities of Davis and Woodland in Yolo County, 402 aircraft (VDCI/ADAPCO Vector Control and the SYMVCD, with the collaboration of the Services, Greenville, MS) for three consecutive Center for Vectorborne Diseases at the University nights on July 30 and 31, and August 1, 2007. The of California–Davis, monitored abundance and application rate was 2.8 g/ha (0.0025 lb/ac) of infection rates and conducted aerial applications pyrethins and 28 g/ha (0.025 lb/ac) of PBO. The of pyrethrins and PBO on the nights of August 8 release altitude was 91 m (300 ft), the wind speed and 9, 2006 (Macedo et al. 2007a, Nielsen et al. ranged from 3.7 km/h to 18.5 km/h, and the 2007). Analysis of data from 2005 and 2006 temperature at the time of the applications ranged showed that the aerial applications could have from 34uCto36uC. Application start times ranged been more successful in interrupting virus trans- from 7:34 p.m. to 7:55 p.m. and application end mission to people if they had been conducted times ranged from 9:20 p.m. to 9:51 p.m. 1 wk or 2 wk before, when mosquito abundance and infection rates were higher (Macedo et al. Mosquito abundance 2008). The first indication of active WNV transmis- To evaluate the effect of the aerial applications sion in the District in 2007 was the detection of on mosquito abundance, the District used en- WNV in a dead American crow on May 31. The cephalitis virus surveillance traps (EVS) baited first positive mosquito pool was obtained on July with dry ice, herein referenced to as CO2 traps 4, 2007, in a pool of Culex pipiens L. West Nile (Rohe and Fall 1979), and gravid-female traps virus continued to amplify during the month of (Cummings 1992) to collect mosquitoes inside July, and mosquito abundance and maximum and outside of the aerial spray zone for 3 days likelihood estimates of minimum infection rates before and 3 days after the application events. continued to be monitored. The District identi- Trap collections were brought to the laboratory, fied an area of approximately 215 km2 in the where mosquitoes were anesthetized with trieth- north part of Sacramento County as higher risk ylamine, identified to species and counted, and and intensified all the aspects of its IPM program then frozen at 280uC for later virus testing. Three in an attempt to reduce mosquito populations. CO2 traps and one gravid trap were placed at On the week of July 24, 2007, infection rates had each of the 12 fixed sites in the aerial spray zone reached 10.85 and 7.87 per 1,000 mosquitoes for and six fixed sites in the untreated control zone Culex tarsalis Coquillett and Cx.
Recommended publications
  • The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks Bioblitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of BioBlitz participants conducting data entry into iNaturalist. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. ON THE COVER Photograph of BioBlitz participants collecting aquatic species data in the Presidio of San Francisco. Photograph courtesy of National Park Service. The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 Elizabeth Edson1, Michelle O’Herron1, Alison Forrestel2, Daniel George3 1Golden Gate Parks Conservancy Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94129 2National Park Service. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1061 Sausalito, CA 94965 3National Park Service. San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory & Monitoring Program Manager Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1063 Sausalito, CA 94965 March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Importance of Mosquitoes
    IMPORTANCE OF MOSQUITOES Portions of this chapter were obtained from the University of Florida and the American Mosquito Control Association Public Health Pest Control website at http://vector.ifas.ufl.edu. Introduction to Pests and Public Health: Arthropods are the most successful group of animals on Earth. They thrive in every habitat and in all regions of the world. A small number of species from this phylum have a great impact on humans, affecting us not only by damaging agriculture and horticultural crops but also through the diseases they can transmit to humans and our domestic animals. Insects can transmit disease (vectors), cause wounds, inject venom, or create nuisance, and have serious social and economic consequences. Arthropods can be indirect (mechanical carriers) or direct (biological carriers) transmitters of disease. As indirect agents they serve as simple mechanical carriers of various bacteria and fungi which may cause disease. As direct or biological agents they serve as vectors for disease­causing agents that require the insect as part of the life cycle. In considering transmission of disease­ causing organisms, it is important to understand the relationships among the vector (the disease­ transmitting organism, i.e. an insect), the disease pathogen (for example, a virus) and the host (humans or animals). The pathogen may or may not undergo different life stages while in the vector. Pathogens that undergo changes in life stages within the vector before being transmitted to a host require the vector—without the vector, the disease life cycle would be broken and the pathogen would die. In either case, the vector is the means for the pathogen to pass from one host to another.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Oral Presentation Abstracts ............................................................................................................................... 3 Plenary Session ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Adult Control I ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Mosquito Lightning Symposium ...................................................................................................................... 5 Student Paper Competition I .......................................................................................................................... 9 Post Regulatory approval SIT adoption ......................................................................................................... 10 16th Arthropod Vector Highlights Symposium ................................................................................................ 11 Adult Control II .......................................................................................................................................... 11 Management .............................................................................................................................................. 14 Student Paper Competition II ...................................................................................................................... 17 Trustee/Commissioner
    [Show full text]
  • North American Wetlands and Mosquito Control
    Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 4537-4605; doi:10.3390/ijerph9124537 OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ISSN 1660-4601 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph Article North American Wetlands and Mosquito Control Jorge R. Rey 1,*, William E. Walton 2, Roger J. Wolfe 3, C. Roxanne Connelly 1, Sheila M. O’Connell 1, Joe Berg 4, Gabrielle E. Sakolsky-Hoopes 5 and Aimlee D. Laderman 6 1 Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory and Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida-IFAS, Vero Beach, FL 342962, USA; E-Mails: [email protected] (R.C.); [email protected] (S.M.O.C.) 2 Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, Franklin, CT 06254, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Biohabitats, Inc., 2081 Clipper Park Road, Baltimore, MD 21211, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 5 Cape Cod Mosquito Control Project, Yarmouth Port, MA 02675, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 6 Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-772-778-7200 (ext. 136). Received: 11 September 2012; in revised form: 21 November 2012 / Accepted: 22 November 2012 / Published: 10 December 2012 Abstract: Wetlands are valuable habitats that provide important social, economic, and ecological services such as flood control, water quality improvement, carbon sequestration, pollutant removal, and primary/secondary production export to terrestrial and aquatic food chains. There is disagreement about the need for mosquito control in wetlands and about the techniques utilized for mosquito abatement and their impacts upon wetlands ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Vector-Host Interactions Governing Epidemiology of West Nile Virus in Southern California
    Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 83(6), 2010, pp. 1269–1282 doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0392 Copyright © 2010 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Vector-Host Interactions Governing Epidemiology of West Nile Virus in Southern California Goudarz Molaei ,* Robert F. Cummings , Tianyun Su , Philip M. Armstrong , Greg A. Williams , Min-Lee Cheng , James P. Webb , † and Theodore G. Andreadis Center for Vector Biology and Zoonotic Diseases, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, Connecticut; Orange County Vector Control District, Garden Grove, California; West Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District, Ontario, California; Northwest Mosquito and Vector Control District, Corona, California Abstract. Southern California remains an important focus of West Nile virus (WNV) activity, with persistently elevated incidence after invasion by the virus in 2003 and subsequent amplification to epidemic levels in 2004. Eco-epidemiological studies of vectors-hosts-pathogen interactions are of paramount importance for better understanding of the transmission dynamics of WNV and other emerging mosquito-borne arboviruses. We investigated vector-host interactions and host- feeding patterns of 531 blood-engorged mosquitoes in four competent mosquito vectors by using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method targeting mitochondrial DNA to identify vertebrate hosts of blood-fed mosquitoes. Diagnostic testing by cell culture, real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR, and immunoassays were used to examine WNV infection in blood-fed mosquitoes, mosquito pools, dead birds, and mammals. Prevalence of WNV antibodies among wild birds was estimated by using a blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Analyses of engorged Culex quinquefasciatus revealed that this mosquito species acquired 88.4% of the blood meals from avian and 11.6% from mammalian hosts, including humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Single Mosquito Metatranscriptomics Identifies Vectors, Emerging Pathogens and Reservoirs in One Assay
    TOOLS AND RESOURCES Single mosquito metatranscriptomics identifies vectors, emerging pathogens and reservoirs in one assay Joshua Batson1†, Gytis Dudas2†, Eric Haas-Stapleton3†, Amy L Kistler1†*, Lucy M Li1†, Phoenix Logan1†, Kalani Ratnasiri4†, Hanna Retallack5† 1Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, United States; 2Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Gothenburg, Sweden; 3Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District, Hayward, United States; 4Program in Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States; 5Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States Abstract Mosquitoes are major infectious disease-carrying vectors. Assessment of current and future risks associated with the mosquito population requires knowledge of the full repertoire of pathogens they carry, including novel viruses, as well as their blood meal sources. Unbiased metatranscriptomic sequencing of individual mosquitoes offers a straightforward, rapid, and quantitative means to acquire this information. Here, we profile 148 diverse wild-caught mosquitoes collected in California and detect sequences from eukaryotes, prokaryotes, 24 known and 46 novel viral species. Importantly, sequencing individuals greatly enhanced the value of the biological information obtained. It allowed us to (a) speciate host mosquito, (b) compute the prevalence of each microbe and recognize a high frequency of viral co-infections, (c) associate animal pathogens with specific blood meal sources, and (d) apply simple co-occurrence methods to recover previously undetected components of highly prevalent segmented viruses. In the context *For correspondence: of emerging diseases, where knowledge about vectors, pathogens, and reservoirs is lacking, the [email protected] approaches described here can provide actionable information for public health surveillance and †These authors contributed intervention decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Sébastian LEQUIME
    UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE ECOLE DOCTORALE 515 « Complexité du Vivant » Groupe à 5 ans – Interactions Virus-Insectes Interactions flavivirus – moustiques : diversité et transmission ! par Sébastian LEQUIME THÈSE DE DOCTORAT en EVOLUTION VIRALE Présentée et soutenue publiquement le : 21 Juin 2016 Devant un jury composé de : M. Samuel ALIZON, Chargé de Recherche Rapporteur M. Jacob KOELLA, Professeur Rapporteur M. Dominique HIGUET, Professeur Examinateur Mme Anna-Bella FAILLOUX, Directeur de Recherche Examinatrice M. Serafín GUTIERREZ, Chargé de Recherche Examinateur M. Louis LAMBRECHTS, Chargé de Recherche Directeur de thèse « Je sais qu’au point où en est arrivée aujourd’hui la microbiologie, tout nouveau grand pas en avant sera une affaire des plus pénibles et que l’on aura beaucoup de mécomptes et de déceptions. » – Alexandre YERSIN, 28 août 1891. Résumé Les infections humaines dues aux virus du genre Flavivirus constituent depuis longtemps un problème de santé publique majeur à travers le monde, en particulier dans les zones à climat tropical. Ces virus à ARN sont des arbovirus qui infectent alternativement un hôte vertébré et un arthropode « vecteur », dont majoritairement des moustiques de la sous-famille des Culicinae. D’autres flavivirus, en revanche, sont incapables d’infecter les cellules de vertébrés et sont qualifiés de flavivirus spécifiques d’insectes (FSI). L’interaction entre les vecteurs et les flavivirus est centrale dans leur biologie, par l’influence qu’elle a sur leur diversité génétique, leur évolution et leur transmission. Cependant, après plus d’un siècle de recherches scientifiques, certains points de ces aspects fondamentaux restent méconnus, malgré une abondance accrue de données. Les approches basées sur les « mégadonnées » (big data) ont été au cœur du travail de cette thèse, qu’elles aient été générées par des technologies modernes ou par compilation de travaux plus anciens.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from NCBI on Mar 27, 2019.) 636 Default Parameters Were Used, Except the E-Value Cutoff Was Set to 1E-2
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.10.942854; this version posted February 13, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. bioRxiv PREPRINT 1 Single MOSQUITO 2 METATRANSCRIPTOMICS RECOVERS 3 MOSQUITO species, BLOOD MEAL 4 SOURces, AND MICROBIAL CARgo, 5 INCLUDING VIRAL DARK MATTER 1† 3† 2† 1*† 6 Joshua Batson , Gytis Dudas , Eric Haas-Stapleton , Amy L. Kistler , Lucy M. 1† 1† 1,4† 5† 7 Li , Phoenix Logan , Kalani Ratnasiri , Hanna Retallack *For CORRespondence: Chan ZuckERBERG Biohub, 499 ILLINOIS St, San FrANCISCO CA 94158; Alameda County [email protected] (AK) 8 1 2 Mosquito Abatement District, 23187 Connecticut St., Hayward, CA 94545; 3GothenburG † 9 These AUTHORS CONTRIBUTED EQUALLY Global Biodiversity Centre, Carl SkOTTSBERGS GATA 22B, 413 19, Gothenburg, Sweden; TO THIS WORK 10 PrOGRAM IN IMMUNOLOGY, StanforD University School OF Medicine, StanforD CA 94305; 11 4 Department OF Biochemistry AND Biophysics, University OF California San Francisco, San 12 5 FrANCISCO CA 94158 13 14 15 AbstrACT Mosquitoes ARE A DISEASE VECTOR WITH A COMPLEX ECOLOGY INVOLVING INTERACTIONS BETWEEN 16 TRANSMISSIBLE pathogens, ENDOGENOUS MICRobiota, AND HUMAN AND ANIMAL BLOOD MEAL SOURces. 17 Unbiased METATRANSCRIPTOMIC SEQUENCING OF INDIVIDUAL MOSQUITOES OffERS A STRAIGHTFORWARD AND 18 RAPID WAY TO CHARACTERIZE THESE dynamics. Here, WE PROfiLE 148 DIVERSE wild-caught MOSQUITOES 19 COLLECTED IN California, DETECTING SEQUENCES FROM eukaryotes, PRokaryotes, AND OVER 70 KNOWN AND 20 NOVEL VIRAL species.
    [Show full text]
  • Single Mosquito Metatranscriptomics Identifies Vectors, Emerging Pathogens and Reservoirs in One Assay
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.10.942854; this version posted December 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Single mosquito metatranscriptomics identifies vectors, emerging pathogens and reservoirs in one assay Joshua Batson, Gytis Dudas, Eric Haas-Stapleton, Amy L. Kistler, Lucy M. Li, Phoenix Logan, Kalani Ratnasiri, Hanna Retallack Abstract Mosquitoes are major infectious disease-carrying vectors. Assessment of current and future risks associated with the mosquito population requires knowledge of the full repertoire of pathogens they carry, including novel viruses, as well as their blood meal sources. Unbiased metatranscriptomic sequencing of individual mosquitoes offers a straightforward, rapid and quantitative means to acquire this information. Here, we profile 148 diverse wild-caught mosquitoes collected in California and detect sequences from eukaryotes, prokaryotes, 24 known and 46 novel viral species. Importantly, sequencing individuals greatly enhanced the value of the biological information obtained. It allowed us to a) speciate host mosquito, b) compute the prevalence of each microbe and recognize a high frequency of viral co-infections, c) associate animal pathogens with specific blood meal sources, and d) apply simple co-occurrence methods to recover previously undetected components of highly prevalent segmented viruses. In the context of emerging diseases, where knowledge about vectors, pathogens, and reservoirs is lacking, the approaches described here can provide actionable information for public health surveillance and intervention decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR Assay to Detect Pyrethroid Resistance in Culex
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.18.444631; this version posted May 18, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 TITLE: 2 3 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR assay to detect pyrethroid resistance in Culex 4 mosquitoes 5 6 Authors: Kelli M. Hager 1,2,6, Erick Gaona1, Amy Kistler 3, Kalani Ratnasiri 3, Hanna 7 Retallack 4, Miguel Barretto 1, Sarah S. Wheeler 6, Christopher M. Hoover 2 8 Eric J. Haas-Stapleton 1* 9 10 Affiliations: 11 1 Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District, Hayward, CA 94545 12 2 University of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA 94720 13 3 Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA 94158 14 4 University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158 15 5 Sacramento-Yolo County Mosquito and Vector Control District, Elk Grove, CA 95624 16 6 Currently: New York State Department of Public Health, Wadsworth Center, Empire 17 State Plasa, Albany, NY 12237 18 19 *Corresponding author: [email protected] 20 21 22 23 Key words: Culex, kdr, pyrethroid resistance, assay bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.18.444631; this version posted May 18, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F. List of Citations Accepted by ECOTOX Criteria and Database
    Appendix F. List of citations accepted by ECOTOX criteria and Database The citations in Appendices F and G were considered for inclusion in ECOTOX. Citations include the ECOTOX Reference number, as well as rejection codes (if relevant). The query was run in October, 1999 and revised March and June, 2000. References in Section F.1 include chlorpyrifos papers accepted by both ECOTOX and OPP and cited within this risk assessment. Sections F.2 through F.4. include the full list of chlorpyrifos papers from the 2007, 2008 and 2009 ECOTOX runs that were accepted by ECOTOX and OPP whether or not cited within the risk assessment and the full list of papers accepted by ECOTOX but not by OPP. ECOTOX Acceptability Criteria and Rejection Codes: Papers must meet minimum criteria for inclusion in the ECOTOX database as established in the Interim Guidance of the Evaluation Criteria for Ecological Toxicity Data in the Open Literature, Phase I and II, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, July 16, 2004. Each study must contain all of the following: • toxic effects from a single chemical exposure; • toxic effects on an aquatic or terrestrial plant or animal species; • biological effects on live, whole organisms; • concurrent environmental chemical concentrations/doses or application rates; and • explicit duration of exposure. Appendix G includes the list of citations excluded by ECOTOX and the list of exclusion terms and descriptions. For chlorpyrifos, hundreds of references were not accepted by ECOTOX for one or more reasons. OPP Acceptability Criteria and Rejection Codes for ECOTOX Data Studies located and coded into ECOTOX should also meet OPP criterion for use in a risk assessment (Section F.1).
    [Show full text]