Current Status of the Milky Stork Captive Breeding Program in Zoo Negara and Its Importance to the Stork Population in Malaysia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Current Status of the Milky Stork Captive Breeding Program in Zoo Negara and Its Importance to the Stork Population in Malaysia Tropical Natural History 11(1): 75-80, April 2011 2011 by Chulalongkorn University Short Note Current Status of the Milky Stork Captive Breeding Program in Zoo Negara and its Importance to the Stork Population in Malaysia AHMAD ISMAIL1*, FAID RAHMAN1, DOREEN KHOO SAY KIN2, MAT NAIM HAJI RAMLI2 AND MOHAMMAD NGAH2 1Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, MALAYSIA 2Zoo Negara Malaysia, Jalan Ulu Kelang, 68000 Ampang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, MALAYSIA * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Received: 11 June 2010; Accepted: 7 January 2011 The Milky Stork, Mycteria cineria breeding and reintroduction program. With Raffles 1822 (Circoniformes: Circoniidae), the support from both government and non- can be found in restricted parts of Southeast government agencies (i.e. PERHILITAN, Asia, being principally in Cambodia, Malaysian Zoological Society, Zoo Negara, Malaysia and throughout Indonesia, with Malaysian Nature Society, etc.) the first vagrant status in Vietnam and Thailand. actual captive breeding and reintroduction Within Malaysia it has the status of rare to program was done between 1998 and 2004 local resident in the Peninsular Malaysia1. in Kuala Selangor Nature Park. The effort Around 50-70 years ago Milky Storks could however had failed due to several problems be found scattered in Peninsula Malaysia and constrains as highlighted by Malaysian from the coasts of Kedah, Perak, Selangor, Nature Society8. The program continues Malacca and Penang2,3, whilst in East today in Kuala Gula, Perak. Before such Malaysia they were also reported to have initiative was taken, the captive breeding existed with the status of rare and much program in Zoo Negara was given less localized4. However, the global Milky Stork priority in solving the Milky Stork issue. population has undergone a rapid population Successful individuals hatched and reared decline with a current estimated population were mainly for the purpose of of 5500 individuals (minimum) remaining multiplication, exhibition and exchange worldwide5. In Malaysia Milky Stork exercise between zoos. Therefore, not until populations have declined more than 90% sometimes after the first reintroduction in over the last 20 years6, from over 100 Kuala Selangor does Zoo Negara focus on individuals in 1984 to 10 in 2005 and less the captive breeding for conservation than five individuals being observed purposes. Regardless, captive breeding is recently in Pulau Kelumpang and Pulau viewed as one of the important components Terung7, the last known Milky Stork in the project and, therefore, its contribution habitats in the Matang Mangrove Forest, and the future of Milky Stork breeding Perak, Malaysia. programs in the Zoo Negara should be The Malaysian government has the evaluated and highlighted. intention to increase the Milky Stork This paper aims to analyse and report the numbers and to this end several actions have Milky Stork breeding program in Zoo been taken, such as a Milky Stork captive Negara and its success. Data on Milky 76 TROPICAL NATURAL HISTORY. 11(1), APRIL 2011 FIGURE 1. Successful egg hatch (total numbers) for the Milky Stork in captivity from 1987 to 2005. Storks in Zoo Negara were obtained from in subsequent years from San Diego Zoo available records kept at Zoo Negara, and Rotterdam Zoo. The first successful updated until the year 2005. Besides the nesting was recorded in 19879 when two hatching records, information from the Zoo pairs of three-year-old birds nested and one Keeper and literature related to Milky pair hatched two clutches of two chicks and Storks in Zoo Negara were also analysed. the surviving chicks later continued to Based on the breeding activity of Milky breed. Records from Zoo Negara give more Storks in captivity, the captive population of insight with four males and four females Milky Storks can be increased by captive Milky Storks successfully producing 19 breeding if proper planning is executed, but chicks within 2 years since 1990. However, data on the successful reintroduction of the according to previous records and species back to the wild is absent. We also observations by the Zoo-keeper, not all the highlight the potential important of this chicks survived. Only 48% of the chicks captive breeding program in repopulating reached their adulthood and continues to wild Milky Stork population, the threats that breed. Most deaths occurred as the result of the released captives might face and the swollen joints and leg deformities. need of specific studies to improve the Malnutrition due to unbalance diet given current attempts at the conservation of may have been the possible cause for this. Milky Storks in Malaysia. Other reasons included nest disturbance or The first five males and five females in collapse of the nest tree structure that Zoo Negara were obtained from Singapore caused the eggs or chicks to be dumped to and Johor Zoo in 1987. Six more adults, the ground, incorrect chick feeding and the with at least three females were introduced weakening of pair bonds due to egg ISMAIL ET AL. — CURRENT STATUS OF MILKY STORK CAPTIVE BREEDING 77 manipulation and artificial egg incubation their own record on date of hatch, early period. Another aspect that is important is growth rates and health. This information is inbreeding. Genetic studies including very important for further breeding and molecular sexing studies on Milky Stork reintroduce programme. Nevertheless, the were carried out recently but the results on past experience of the last 23 years of inbreeding are still under investigation10,11. breeding captive Milky storks in Zoo Figure 1 summarizes the available Negara has led to improved handling records of yearly total for Milky Stork eggs methods and artificial nest support hatched in captivity in Zoo Negara. Since construction, chick rearing methods and so 1987, 10 individuals were reared in a cage on giving a great aid to future captive of 30 m x 30 m x 14 m and from these the breeding programs here or elsewhere. captive population has increased to more The Milky Stork captive breeding than 100 individuals beyond 2005. During program aims to re-establish the lost the first 10 to 20 years in captivity, the poor population of Milky Storks in Malaysia by documentation on bird growth, survival and re-introducing the captives into a new improper labelling means the detailed environment. This then requires a suitable information on the breeding success is not location capable of supporting the released available. This poor documentation was birds in terms of shelter, food, breeding probably due to early function of Zoo grounds, low parasite, predator risks and Negara as an exhibition and education other threats. Many of these aspects can be centre. Only recently has Zoo Negara suitably met and controlled in specific become more active in education, research conservation sites. Matang Mangrove Forest and conservation. Moreover, with the is one of the proposed ideal sites for the limited cage size and available space in Zoo release program in Peninsular Malaysia. Negara, the excess numbers of Milky Storks Further study, however, is needed to address were used in exchange programs with both the importance of managing and conserving local and international zoos as part of a specific habitats that play an important role conservation program. A total of 47 Milky for these birds. In the meantime, Zoo Stork individuals were produced between Negara will play a role as the main Milky 1990 and 1996 with minimum of 3 and Stork supplier for this program to meet its maximum of 9 successfully hatching chicks objectives. With the current population each year. However, no data for the number trend, (high number of breeding adult birds of chicks that hatched from 1997 to 1999 aged 5 years and above) the number of inclusive is available. The birds were Milky Storks in Zoo Negara is expected to probably left to breed in the cage and increase within the next few years. As the records were not made during this period. Zoo Negara supply the Milky Storks, it The years 2002 and 2005 show the two should maintain a healthy number of the highest numbers of chicks hatched at 22 and birds in its possession. However, these are 17 respectively, with a total of 39 fairly considerably genetic bottlenecked and individuals recorded. Breeding activity was inbred and so new out bred breeding stock reported to continue until the present day should be introduced and introgressed into and proper records have been kept as a these stocks at the zoo as soon as possible priority only after 2005. Every birds hatched and then expanded from there. in Zoo Negara will be marked and have 78 TROPICAL NATURAL HISTORY. 11(1), APRIL 2011 From what we have discussed, based on with the widespread destruction of the increased number of birds, Milky Storks mangrove forests, especially in Asia22-24. can be successfully bred in captivity, even Milky Stork populations have thus though with minimal effort as shown in Zoo indirectly been threatened by the Negara during the early period. In contrast, uncontrolled expansion of the aquaculture the significant decrease in the wild industry. Therefore, responsible authorities population size and distribution patterns of should continuously monitor Malaysia’s Milky Storks since 1989 suggests not only coastal activities. that habitat protection alone is not sufficient Other threats to introduced populations, and a reintroduction from captive stock is as per wild birds, would include poaching of likely to be required. In contrast to the eggs or adults, disease, predation, decline in wild populations, the number of hybridisation with other stork species, captive breeding individuals in Zoo Negara inability to correctly hold and defend has increased from 10 to more than 100 breeding territory or hunt for food individuals in 2005. We therefore conclude (following captive breeding) and that not only it is possible to breed Milky susceptibility to disease or poor mating Storks in captivity, but that the decline in characteristics and low fecundity associated wild Milky Stork populations is attributed to with inbreeding and low genetic variability.
Recommended publications
  • Detailed Species Accounts from The
    Threatened Birds of Asia: The BirdLife International Red Data Book Editors N. J. COLLAR (Editor-in-chief), A. V. ANDREEV, S. CHAN, M. J. CROSBY, S. SUBRAMANYA and J. A. TOBIAS Maps by RUDYANTO and M. J. CROSBY Principal compilers and data contributors ■ BANGLADESH P. Thompson ■ BHUTAN R. Pradhan; C. Inskipp, T. Inskipp ■ CAMBODIA Sun Hean; C. M. Poole ■ CHINA ■ MAINLAND CHINA Zheng Guangmei; Ding Changqing, Gao Wei, Gao Yuren, Li Fulai, Liu Naifa, Ma Zhijun, the late Tan Yaokuang, Wang Qishan, Xu Weishu, Yang Lan, Yu Zhiwei, Zhang Zhengwang. ■ HONG KONG Hong Kong Bird Watching Society (BirdLife Affiliate); H. F. Cheung; F. N. Y. Lock, C. K. W. Ma, Y. T. Yu. ■ TAIWAN Wild Bird Federation of Taiwan (BirdLife Partner); L. Liu Severinghaus; Chang Chin-lung, Chiang Ming-liang, Fang Woei-horng, Ho Yi-hsian, Hwang Kwang-yin, Lin Wei-yuan, Lin Wen-horn, Lo Hung-ren, Sha Chian-chung, Yau Cheng-teh. ■ INDIA Bombay Natural History Society (BirdLife Partner Designate) and Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History; L. Vijayan and V. S. Vijayan; S. Balachandran, R. Bhargava, P. C. Bhattacharjee, S. Bhupathy, A. Chaudhury, P. Gole, S. A. Hussain, R. Kaul, U. Lachungpa, R. Naroji, S. Pandey, A. Pittie, V. Prakash, A. Rahmani, P. Saikia, R. Sankaran, P. Singh, R. Sugathan, Zafar-ul Islam ■ INDONESIA BirdLife International Indonesia Country Programme; Ria Saryanthi; D. Agista, S. van Balen, Y. Cahyadin, R. F. A. Grimmett, F. R. Lambert, M. Poulsen, Rudyanto, I. Setiawan, C. Trainor ■ JAPAN Wild Bird Society of Japan (BirdLife Partner); Y. Fujimaki; Y. Kanai, H.
    [Show full text]
  • Other Threatened Species
    Other threatened species Table of Contents Other threatened species ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Other threatened species 2017 ........................................................................................................................... 2 Other threatened species 2016 ........................................................................................................................... 3 Other threatened species 2015 and earlier .................................................................................................... 3 1 Other threatened species Other threatened species 2017 Chowdhury, S. U., Neumann-Denzau, G., & Muzaffar, S. Bin. 2017. Nesting Ecology and Habitat Preference of the Masked Finfoot (Heliopais personatus) in Sundarbans, Bangladesh. Waterbirds, 40(4), 410–416. https://doi.org/10.1675/063.040.0413 (Abstract) The Masked Finfoot (Heliopais personatus) has a global population estimated at 1,000 individuals, but very little is known about its ecology. Therefore, the nesting ecology of the Masked Finfoot was studied in the Sundarbans of Bangladesh between 2011 and 2014, and compared to nesting observations from the same area made in 2004. A total of 25 nests were detected in 2011–2014: 56% (n = 14) on blinding mangrove (Excoecaria agallocha), 36 % (n = 9) on sundri (Heritiera fomes) and 8% (n = 2) on cannonball mangrove (Xylocarpus granatum). Factor analysis revealed that 2004 nest characteristics
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report to Rufford Small Grant
    Survei and Conservation of Milky Stork Mycteria cinerea in Sumatra, Indonesia Final Report to Rufford Small Grant Reported by Muhammad Iqbal This final report was produced for Rufford Small Grant (RSG) for Nature Conservation Under Contract No. 24.01.08Under Contract No. 24.01.08 i CONTENTS Page CONTENTS ii TABLES iv FIGURES v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vii SUMMARY viii 1. INTRODUCTION 01 1.1. Background 01 1.2. Objectives of the survey 02 2. METHODS AND AREAS SURVEYED 03 2.1. Areas covered 03 2.2. Time schedule and survey team 04 2.3. Survey Methods 08 2.3.1. Interviews 08 2.3.2. Survey 08 2.4. Analysis 08 2.5. Education/public information 09 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 10 3.1. Local People’s Perspective for Milky Stork 10 3.2. Milky Stork in the east coastal of South Sumatra, Indonesia 13 3.2.1. Historical information on Milky Stork in the east coastal of South Sumatra 13 3.2.2. Current Milky Stork population in the east coastal of South Sumatra 14 3.3. Breeding record of Milky stork in Sumatra 16 3.3.1. Historical information on Breeding record of Milky Stork in Sumatra 16 3.3.2. Current Breeding record of Milky Stork in Sumatra 16 3.3.3. Current Breeding success of Milky Stork in Sumatra 23 3.4. Foraging and Food 29 3.5. Threats of Milky stork in Sumatra 30 4. SOME INTERESTING OTHER BIRD RECORD 31 5. IMPORTANT ACHIEVEMENTS 34 6. CREATE MILKY STORK AWARENESS 37 7. POST-PROJECT FOLLOW-UP 40 7.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring of Large Waterbirds at Prek Toal, Tonle Sap Great Lake 2009
    Preface This document presents the results of annual biodiversity monitoring activities in and around the Tonle Sap lake and floodplain for the period August 2008 - June 2009. Compiled by WCS, under contract to the Tonle Sap Conservation Project and MoE, the document draws on work by a consortium of other government agencies, notably the Forestry and Fisheries Administrations, and a number of NGOs. Accurate monitoring of this kind enables conservationists to monitor the success of our programs, detect new threats as they arise and communicate the importance of the Tonle Sap ecosystem to decision-makers. It probably represents one of the most ambitious and technically rigorous programs of its kind for any ecosystem in the region and is a testament to the cooperation and dedication of the participants. The monitoring described here focuses on populations of rare birds, partly because they form one of the most significant aspects of the biodiversity of the lake and partly because they indicate the health of the Tonle Sap ecosystem more broadly. The scope of monitoring in this unique and biologically rich area has grown over the past ten years, hand in hand with the growth of a series of on-the-ground conservation projects at key sites. There is now monitoring in place for thirteen key species, six of them globally threatened, at seven key conservation areas in the Tonle Sap Biosphere Reserve and across the wider floodplain. Most of the protocols used for the described monitoring work were printed in a reference document in 20071. A parallel system of monitoring for fish, watersnakes and other aquatic species is conducted by the Fisheries Administration, Ministry of Environment and many other stakeholders, with the results published in a separate series of reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Mycteria Cinerea Milky Stork
    WILDLIFE MONITORING AT PREK TOAL RAMSAR SITE, TONLE SAP GREAT LAKE 2013 and 2014 December 2015 Sun Visal and Simon Mahood, Suggested Citation: Sun Visal and Mahood, S. (2015) Wildlife Monitoring at Prek Toal Ramsar Site, Tonle Sap Great Lake, 2013 and 2014. Wildlife Conservation Society, Cambodia Program, Phnom Penh. Sun Visal and Mahood, S. (2015) Wildlife Monitoring at Prek Toal Ramsar Site, Tonle Sap Great Lake, 2013 and 2014 . Wildlife Conservation Society, Cambodia Program, Phnom Penh. Sun Visal Mobile: (855-12) 708 836 E-mail: [email protected] Simon Mahood Mobile: (855-89) 519 936 E-mail:[email protected] Design and Print by Sot Sorphorn Khmer Design Group #168H, St. 45BT, Boeung Tompun, Meanchey, Phnom Penh (855) 012 618 771 / 086 858 575 [email protected] Facebook: Khmer Design Group www.khmerdesigngroup.co Copies Availablo from: Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) Cambodia Program, #21, Street 21, Tonle Bassac, PO . Box 1620 Phnom Penh Tel/Fax: 023 217 205 Email: [email protected] www.wcs.org 2015 Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank H. E. Say Samal, the Minister of Environment for his commitment to wetland conservation on the Tonle Sap Great Lake, and in particular Prek Toal Core Area. We also thank H. E. Chay Samith, Delegate of the Royal Government of Cambodia in charge of the General Department of Administration for Nature Conservation and Protection (GDANCP) of the Ministry of Environment (MoE), Dr. Srey Sunleang the Director of the Department of Fresh- water Wetland Conservation (DoFWC) and Mr. Long Kheng the Director of Prek Toal Core Area. Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • View Printable Itinerary
    Indonesia’s Best Birding With Naturalist Journeys & Caligo Ventures September 14 – 30, 2021 866.900.1146 800.426.7781 520.558.1146 [email protected] www.naturalistjourneys.com or find us on Facebook at Naturalist Journeys, LLC Naturalist Journeys, LLC | Caligo Ventures PO Box 16545 Portal, AZ 85632 PH: 520.558.1146 | 866.900.1146 Fax 650.471.7667 naturalistjourneys.com | caligo.com [email protected] | [email protected] Join Naturalist Journeys on an incredible Tour Summary adventure to Indonesia, where we seek out 17-Day / 16-Night Indonesian Birding Tour w/ Nick Upton the region’s most colorful, jewel-like birds $5690, from Jakarta, departing Bali with our trusted local guide, Nick Upton. Arrival airport is Soekarno-Hatta International (CGK), Departure airport is Ngurah Rai International (DPS) Visit Way Kambas National Park for specialties like Banded Broadbill and for excellent night birding. Look for waterbirds, shorebirds, and Tour Highlights more in Jakarta Bay. Visit two different • Explore Sumatra’s Way Kambas NP for beautiful botanic gardens for an introduction to local pittas, exceptional night birds, and myriad flora as we search for Yellow-throated woodpeckers Hanging Parrot. Explore the forested slopes of • Cruise Jakarta Bay for Sunda Coucal and rare Gunung Gede, a prized birding location. Black-winged Myna, as well as waders like Javan Explore Bali Barat National Park, picture Pond and Purple Herons perfect and home of the stunning and • See rare Christmas Island Frigatebird before endangered Bali Myna. exploring Pulau Rambut island reserve for rarities Day-to-Day Itinerary like Milky Stork • Visit Cibodas Botanical Gardens with lovely views of the volcanic summits that form Gunung Gede- Tues., Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Lomphat Conservation Project
    Continuing Conservation Practices at Lomphat WS Final Programmatic Report May 2004 – April 2005 LOMPHAT CONSERVATION PROJECT Continuation of wildlife conservation and park protection practices in Lomphat Wildlife Sanctuary, Cambodia Programmatic Report May 2004 – April 2005 (Year 2) STF grant 2004-0103-008 USFWS grant 98210-4-G783 Ministry of Environment Department of Nature Conservation and Protection 0 Continuing Conservation Practices at Lomphat WS Final Report, May 2004 – April 2005 US Fish and Wildlife Rhino and Tiger Conservation Fund grant #98210-4-G783 National Fish and Wildlife Foundation / Save the Tiger Fund grant #2004-0103-008 Care for The Wild International The Lomphat Conservation Project, a joint DNCP/WildAid initiative, has introduced conservation management practices to Lomphat Wildlife Sanctuary, Northeast Cambodia. There are three international donors to this project: NFWF-Save the Tiger Fund (STF); US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS); and, Care for the Wild International (CFTWI). USFWS matched NFWS-STF’s fund; there are shared expenses but no duplication of funding. Care for the Wild International’s grant mostly covered costs for field equipment, boats, radios, and motorbikes not covered by the two other grants. INTRODUCTION The Lomphat Wildlife Sanctuary (LWS) is one of the richest wildlife habitats in Cambodia and appears to be one of the last viable habitats for tigers in the Kingdom. The Lomphat project, launched in June 2003, is training and equipping rangers and field staff to ensure that wildlife in LWS is protected over the long term. The rangers patrol the sanctuary, monitor wildlife with camera traps and other techniques, and work with communities to build local support for the sanctuary and for anti-poaching efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambodia Custom Tour
    Cambodia Custom Tour 9th – 18 th March, 2013 Guided by Charley Hesse & Mony Sang Report by Charley Hesse. Angkor Wat, built in the 12 th century, is a must see for any visitor to Cambodia. (Charley Hesse) Birders come to Cambodia to find species no longer available in other countries. With an ever expanding network of sites for some of SE Asia’s rarest large birds, and conservation efforts in a race against rapid environmental destruction and hunting, there is no better time to come. This short custom tour concentrated on the must see birds of Cambodia, starting with the endangered race of Sarus Crane and Milky Stork at Ang Trapeng Tmor, threatened waterbirds like Spot-billed Pelican and both adjutants at Prek Toal, Bengal Florican & Manchurian Reed-Warbler on the flood plain grasslands of Tonle Sap, Giant & White-shouldered Ibises and numerous owls & woodpeckers in the dry deciduous dipterocarp forests of Tmat Boey, and finally to the evergreen forests of Bokor National Park in the south where we tracked down the charismatic Chestnut-headed Partridge. In just 8 and a half days of birding, we racked up an impressive 289 species including all major targets for the trip. Of course no trip to Cambodia would be complete without a trip to the ancient temples at Angkor including the largest religious building in the world, Angkor Wat. All tour participents were impressed by the quality of birding, the friendly & welcoming nature of the Cambodian people, good food and were happy to be supporting the excellent conservation work of our ground agent.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Checklists of the World Country Or Region: Malaysia
    Avibase Page 1of 23 Col Location Date Start time Duration Distance Avibase - Bird Checklists of the World 1 Country or region: Malaysia 2 Number of species: 799 3 Number of endemics: 14 4 Number of breeding endemics: 0 5 Number of introduced species: 17 6 Date last reviewed: 2020-03-19 7 8 9 10 Recommended citation: Lepage, D. 2021. Checklist of the birds of Malaysia. Avibase, the world bird database. Retrieved from .https://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/checklist.jsp?lang=EN&region=my [23/09/2021]. Make your observations count! Submit your data to ebird.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Waterbird Census Count Form
    Asian Waterbird Census (Southeast Asia) Please return to your National Co-ordinator or Wetland Country: International, 3A39, Kelana Centre Point, No. 3, Jalan SS7/19, Kelana Jaya 47301, MALAYSIA (before March) Name of Site: Date: Province/State/Prefecture: Site Code (only for official use): Nearest Large Town: Type: A - Aerial, F - On foot, B - By boat, M - Mixed Has the site been counted before? Coverage: V-25%, W-25-50%, X-50-75%, Y-75-99%, Z-100% Yes No Waterfowl Counts Little Grebe Tachybaptus ruficollis GEESE & DUCKS CORMORANTS & DARTERS Spotted Whistling Duck Dendrocygna guttata Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo Fulvous (Large) Whistling Duck D. bicolor Indian Shag P. fuscicollis Wandering Whistling Duck D. arcuata Little Cormorant P. niger Lesser Whistling Duck (Lesser Tree Duck) D. javanica Unidentified cormorants Greylag Goose Anser anser Oriental Darter Anhinga melanogaster Bar-headed Goose A. indicus HERONS & EGRETS Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna ferruginea Great Bittern Botaurus stellaris Common Shelduck T. tadorna Yellow Bittern Ixobrychus sinensis White-winged Wood Duck Cairina scutulata Schrenck’s Bittern I. eurhythmus Comb Duck Sarkidiornis melanotos Cinnamon Bittern /. cinnamomeus Indian Cotton Teal Nettapus coromandelianus Black Bittern I. flavicollis Eurasian Wigeon Anas penelope Japanese Night Heron Gorsachius goisagi Falcated Teal A. falcata Malayan Night Heron (Tiger Bittern) G. melanolophus Gadwall A. strepera Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax Common (Green-winged) Teal A. crecca Rufous Night Heron N. caledonicus Grey Teal A. gibberifrons Indian Pond Heron Ardeola grayii Mallard A. platyrhynchos Chinese Pond Heron A. bacchus Spot-billed Duck A. poecilorhyncha Javan Pond Heron A. speciosa Philippine Duck A. luzonica Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis Northern Pintail A.
    [Show full text]
  • Adjutant Storks at Risk in Assam, India
    l2 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BIRD PRESERVATION/ INTERNATIONAL WATERFOWL AND WETLANDS RESEARCH BUREAU SPECIALIST GROUP ON STORKS, IBISES AND SPOONBIIIS N EWSLETTER I Volume 2, Number 1/2 December, 1989 I INTRODUCTION must continuously update our understanding of the status of storks, ibises and spoonbills throughout the world. Many of the species are In the spring of 1989, we (Koen Brouwer endangered, and we must act to save these and Malcolm Coulter) were elected as Co- birds. While some situations are urgent and ' chairmen of the ICBP/IWRB Specialist Group on require immediate action, we must also consider - Storks, lbises and' Spoonbills to continue the the longer term. For species that we know are work of Charlie Luthin. We look forward to the under pressure, we need to develop long challenges and to working with you. The group, ranging Action P/ans which'will allow greater of (ourse, is the responsibility of all of us. lt will planning with good chances of success. We must take everyone to. meet the large conservation begin to think about these longer-range plans. challenges ahead. Each person has his own responsibilities, but by working together we will Many storks, ibises and spoonbitls are be inuch stronger than any of us individually. wetland species, others live in drier habitats. Their conservation problems are often related Dr. Wennrich intiated the group. He set up to loss or destruction of habitat which threatens a library and began building the network. He other birds of these same areas. In our efforts to.. established a strong base for Charlie Luthin who preserve storks, ibises and spoonbills, it will be succeedecl him.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Overview and Recommendations for the Conservation of Milky Stork Mycteria Cinerea in Malaysia
    Status Overview and Recommendations for the Conservation of Milky Stork Mycteria cinerea in Malaysia Final Report of the 2004/2006 Milky Stork Field Surveys in the Matang Mangrove Forest, Perak, Malaysia David Li Zuo Wei, Siti Hawa Yatim, John Howes and Rahmah Ilias February 2006 Produced by Wetlands International and the Department of Wildlife and National Parks, Peninsular Malaysia Project implementation supported by Malaysian Nature Society Main sponsor Nagao Natural Environment Foundation, Japan Co-sponsor Tan Kean Cheong Bird Conservation Memorial Fund, Perak © Wetlands International 2006 Pages from this publication may be reproduced freely for educational, journalistic, and other non-commercial purposes. Prior permission must be given for all other forms of reproduction. Full credit must always be given to the copyright holder. ISBN 983-40960-9-7 This publication should be cited as follows: Li, Z.W.D., Siti Hawa Yatim, Howes, J. and Rahmah Ilias. 2006. Status Overview and Recommendations for the Conservation of Milky Stork Mycteria cinerea in Malaysia: Final Report of the 2004/2006 Milky Stork Field Surveys in the Matang Mangrove Forest, Perak, Malaysia. Wetlands International and the Department of Wildlife and National Parks, Peninsular Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Published by Wetlands International Available from: Wetlands International - Malaysia Office 3A39, Block A, Lobby C, Kelana Centre Point Jalan SS7/19, Petaling Jaya 47301 Selangor Tel: 03-78046770 Fax: 03-78046772 Email: [email protected] Website: www.wetlands.org Department of Wildlife and National Parks (PERHILITAN), Peninsular Malaysia Km 10, Jalan Cheras 56100 Kuala Lumpur Tel: 03-90752872 Fax: 03-90752873 Email: [email protected] Website: www.wildlife.gov.my Cover painting: Lim Chiao Mei.
    [Show full text]