DOCSLIB.ORG

Modern Warfare : a French View of Counterinsurgency Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modern Warfare : a French View of Counterinsurgency Ebook MODERN WARFARE : A FRENCH VIEW OF COUNTERINSURGENCY PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Roger Trinquier | 120 pages | 30 Aug 2006 | ABC-CLIO | 9780275992682 | English | Westport, United States Modern Warfare : A French View of Counterinsurgency PDF Book Today, the French deploy for four months. However, the frequency with which these terms appear in French documents does not give us a good idea of the extent to which French forces are focused on civil-military activities as opposed to war fighting. Oxford Research Encyclopedias American History. Apr 06, Michael rated it really liked it. Embracing these new animals, developing new ways to utilize them, transformed this obscure southwestern nation into some of the greatest cavalry warriors since the Mongols. The logistical core of the movement is the true target, and finding it requires building a complete civilian intelligence service, that links everybody to their house and social position household, hamlet, village, district, etc , and then to a system that gathers human intelligence and funnels it to the military police. Surely good government, clean water, a generous welfare system, adequate health care and free public K education who have made joining a gang unnecessary or outdated. French commanders bemoaned the fact that, in Indochina, the French side offered nothing comparable beyond the negative ideology of anti-communism. France was, to use the American expression, building the airplane while flying it. The general pattern was to operate light and rely on fire support from aircraft whenever combat situations got too dire. The Modern War Institute does not screen articles to fit a particular editorial agenda, nor endorse or advocate material that is published. The French also counted on Chadian troops and local militia to fill in areas they had cleared, conducting what in essence was an oil spot strategy. An analysis of counterinsurgency in Iraq: Mosul, Ramadi, and Samarra from Details if other :. View 1 excerpt, cites results. Critics of French interventions in Africa such as Bruno Charbonneau stress the continuities between colonial, neo- colonial, and contemporary policies and practices. Other primary considerations focused on supporting the people rather than destruction, and achieving gains with as little use of force a loss of civilian life as possible. As the title says, culture is critical in the battle for winning popular support. The Americanization of the French army takes many forms. That is to say that the population - the peasants - are the focus of support and legitimacy of the counterinsurgency solution and form the hub of counterinsurgency strategy. Kopets, K. While not technically an insurgent, this twentieth-century Japanese gangster has a very prophetic chapter on his beginnings at the end of World War II. The answer was to restore the hope of the people and gain their support for the government. But they are not sufficient: the adversary will not be happy with them because it is power he is aiming for. Keywords insurgency counterinsurgency pacification infrastructure guerrillas U. Javascript is not enabled in your browser. Disclaimer The articles and other content which appear on the Modern War Institute website are unofficial expressions of opinion. Cambridge, Mass. Now the intervening force is in the passenger seat. Everything seems a little too neat. Nonetheless, Hogard was adamant that reforms, while necessary, were never sufficient: These reforms are not useless. Oct 07, Adam Elkus rated it really liked it Shelves: military-theory. Jun 10, Ian Fleischmann rated it it was ok. Advertisement Hide. One way is by insisting on the words partenaire partner and partenariat partnership. Clutterbuck, Brigadier. It is unsurprising, Guichaoua argues, that Malian protestors often focus on the issue of national sovereignty. However, it is difficult to accurately judge the relative proportions of the civilian versus military side of the effort, given the number of entities involved in the former and the much greater visibility of the latter. But such as: b. Primary principles were, close civil and military coordination, firm and fair governance, and reform of education and business. This does not, however, mean that France has abandoned the global approach. More profoundly, France ceased to intervene to shore up its own legitimacy and preserve its rule. His work is realistic and concrete, but his methods are hard to envision in an age of even more media bias and increased connectivity. Jun 25, Stephen rated it liked it Shelves: counterinsurgency. Modern Warfare : A French View of Counterinsurgency Writer Indeed, documents contain the word partenariat , and the same number contain the word partenaire. Army War College, What has been less well documented, although an integral and central part of insurgencies and counterinsurgencies is the role that peasant populations played in the emergence, evolution, and ultimate success or failure of either as a strategy. We have to remember only to destroy as a last resort; and even then[,] we must only destroy in order to rebuild. In: Paret, P. The number of warriors armed with rifles and hand grenades is not the decisive factor. Seidel, J. Finally, we need to get our hands dirty doing the close archival research required to gain a full picture of how French counterinsurgency practices unfolded on the ground. At the time of Hank Aaron's birth in , Babe Ruth reigned as baseball's home A telling example of a French post- colonial intervention is the intervention in Chad from to , referred to as Operation Bison. Rather, it was the competence in battle of his mixed force of Legionnaires and Alpine troops which proved decisive. Whether or not French methods worked in Algeria is difficult to determine. The French are clearly trying to create as much distance between their current policy and colonial practices as possible. The theories of counterinsurgency proposed by Trinquier are rather abstract and might be difficult for troops to apply to real-world combat situations. In the meantime, France will be tempted to be more colonial, in the sense that it will want to intervene in politics more directly. Skip to main content. This creates more questions: What are the French doing? A French Army study of the French-raised Indochinese forces points to failures largely associated with a lack of enough French officers and non-commissioned officers to guide them and above-all the lack of time needed to prepare them. And those are just the big ones. There was a third generation of French COIN doctrine developed in the 21st century in response to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, which prompted French officers to dust off the Indochina-era doctrine and update it. The high visibility of the two officers, however, does not reflect their strategic importance during the Algeria War as much as their success in marketing themselves to an international audience afterward. A step above the Osprey Series, this short work details a successful counterinsurgency. This is a key legitimating goal for any counterinsurgent force and difficult to achieve. Not only will insurgents be short on weapons, manpower, and supplies, but two of their greatest advantages, safe haven and intelligence on the counterinsurgents movements, will be neutralized as well. As in earlier colonial conflicts, the French relied on mobility, making extensive use of airborne capabilities and air transport, and depended to a dangerous degree on a small ragtag fleet of aircraft that the French could barely keep airborne due to limited air and maintenance crews, as well as variable weather conditions. A novel of radicalization. In the traditional sense, military capability plays a central role in determining victory on the battlefield. Results Citations. Learn more. As long as the population remains under the control of the insurgent, the insurgents retain the initiative and the ability to choose battle on their terms. They experimented with static positions and base designs, shifting from small posts to large posts, and moved their concentration from attempting to control territory to focusing simply on lines of communication. David C. Modern Warfare : A French View of Counterinsurgency Reviews Closely matching theory with practical experience he addresses offensive and defensive operations in remote areas as well as cities but concentrates on the operations of security forces he recognizes are only part of the governmental reaction to the insurgency. French forces had to invent and adapt. Granted, An Loc was a conventional, set-piece fight with the NVA, but the relevancy applies to scenarios of host-nation support. There are other examples of French meddling. Specifically, Dirou adopted an approach used by American provincial reconstruction teams in Afghanistan intended to guide development work and service provision. He liked the glamor of kicking over governments but never stuck around for the drudgery of building one. Please follow the detailed Help center instructions to transfer the files to supported eReaders. Why does he distinguish it for terrorists only? Key concerns include: qualitative analysis distorted by policy expectation, obstructed by compartmentalization and classification, and mistaken when drawing from the wrong history and experience. Results Citations. Many, including Michel Goya — a retired French army colonel who is now a respected and influential military historian and analyst — argue that on balance, they did work. On one end of the spectrum was Trinquier, who emphasized
Load more

Recommended publications
  • During the Algerian War of Independence (1954-1962): Mansourah, Kabylia
    A MICROHISTORY OF THE FORCED RESETTLEMENT OF THE ALGERIAN MUSLIM POPULATION DURING THE ALGERIAN WAR OF INDEPENDENCE (1954-1962): MANSOURAH, KABYLIA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES OF GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN Arab Studies BY DOROTHEE M. KELLOU, B.A. WASHINGTON, DC APRIL 18, 2012 Copyright 2012 by DOROTHEE M. KELLOU All Rights Reserved ii A MICROHISTORY OF THE FORCED RESETTLEMENT OF THE ALGERIAN MUSLIM POPULATION DURING THE ALGERIAN WAR OF INDEPENDENCE (1954-1962): MANSOURAH, KABYLIA DOROTHEE M. KELLOU, M.A. THESIS ADVISOR: OSAMA ABI-MERSHED, PHD. Abstract During the Algerian war of independence, which lasted from 1954-1962, about 3,525,000 Algerians were forced to leave their homes. 2,350,000 of them were resettled in camps created ex-nihilo by the French army and 1,175,000 of them were resettled in pre-existing villages near French military outposts. This practice of resettlement, euphemistically referred to as regroupement in the French official terminology, was an essential tool of the French military policy of pacification. This thesis presents a microhistory of the resettlement of Algerian Muslims by the French military. It focuses on one case, the village of Mansourah, located in the South of Kabylia, 220 km East of Algiers. By juxtaposing and putting into dialogue memories of both the Algerian Muslim population and the French army, and with the aid of archival documents, I seek to illuminate the history of regroupement in Mansourah. By using a Foucauldian conception of subject and power, this thesis shows how the French colonial powers used disciplinary methods and brutal means of repression to create docile bodies, perpetuate their domination over Algeria, and affect the subjectivity of the colonized.
    [Show full text]
  • A Total War of the Mind: the French Theory of La Guerre Révolutionnaire, 1954-1958
    King’s Research Portal DOI: 10.1177/0968344516661214 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Finch, M. P. M. (2017). A Total War of the Mind: the French Theory of la Guerre Révolutionnaire, 1954-1958. War in History . https://doi.org/10.1177/0968344516661214 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Crp 2 B 2 0 0
    ...... ..... ...... ..... .......... ... ........ .!;:i - - ... K.-- i:--B ........ .. ........ .......... .... ... ... ..... .... ... ... ... ..... .... oiu on .... ....... .. Coun n torri.e.,va ol, til Mozamb4w's War of ln.dOen en,-,o 19"64-1974 THOMAS 1. HENRIKSFN .... --------. ........ ........ ... ..... .... ... .......... i- - ro P. ....... .......... .................... 27 Northwestern University Library Evanston, Illinois 60201 LL Revolution and Counterrevolution Mozambique ... 9- i . + J . ,i+J m+. Revolution and Counterrevolution Mozambique's War of Independence, 1964-1974 THOMAS H. HENRIKSEN Contributions in Intercultural and Comparative Studies, Number 6 P Greenwood Press Westport, Connecticut * London, England 9G-1.103 H r Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Henriksen, Thomas H. Revolution and counterrevolution. (Contributions in intercultural and comparative studies, ISSN 0147-1031 ; no. 6) Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Mozambique-Politics and government-To 1975. 2. National liberation movements-Mozambique. 3. Guerrillas-Mozambique. I. Title. I. Series. DT463.H46 967'.903 82- 6132 ISBN 0-313-23605-4 (lib. bdg.) AACR2 Copyright © 1983 by Thomas H. Henriksen All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 82-6132 ISBN: 0-313-23605-4 ISSN: 0147-1031 First published in 1983 Greenwood Press A division of Congressional Information Service, Inc. 88 Post Road West Westport, Connecticut 06881 Printed in the United States of America 10987654321 Once again, for Margaret Mary, Heather, Damien and Mungo Contents Tables ix Preface xi 1. Background to Revolution: Pacification and Resistance 3 2. The Military Insurgency of the Revolution 27 3. The Military Counterinsurgency of the Counterrevolution 45 4. Mobilization 71 5. Countermobilization 93 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Burning the Veil: the Algerian War and the 'Emancipation' of Muslim
    3 Unveiling: the ‘revolutionary journées’ of 13 May 1958 Throughout the period from early 1956 to early 1958 putschist forces had been gathering strength both within the army and among right- wing settler organisations and these eventually coalesced on 13 May 1958 when crowds gathered in the Forum and stormed the General Government buildings. The military rapidly used the crisis to effect a bloodless coup and to install a temporary ‘revolutionary’ authority headed by a Committee of Public Safety (Comité de salut public or CSP) under Generals Massu and Salan. There then followed a tense stand- off between the army in Algeria and the new Paris government headed by Pierre Pfl imlin, a three-week period during which civil war was a real possibility, until de Gaulle agreed to assume, once again, the role of ‘saviour of the nation’, and was voted into power by the National Assembly on 1 June.1 ‘13 May’ was one of the great turning points in modern French history, not only because it marked a key stage in the Algerian War, but more signifi cantly the collapse of the Fourth Republic, de Gaulle’s return to power, and the beginnings of the new constitutional regime of the Fifth Republic. The planning of the coup and its implementation was extraordi- narily complex – the Bromberger brothers in Les 13 Complots du 13 mai counted thirteen strands2 – but basically two antagonistic politi- cal formations reached agreement to rally to the call for de Gaulle’s return to power. On the one hand there was a secret plot by Gaullists, most notably Michel Debré (soon to become Prime Minister), Jacques Soustelle, Léon Delbecque and Jacques Chaban-Delmas (acting Minister of Defence), to engineer the return of the General so as to resolve the political crisis of the ‘system’, the dead hand of the party system of the Fourth Republic, which they viewed as destroying the grandeur of France.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Spaces of Guerre Moderne: the French Army in Northern Algeria (1954–1962) Samia Henni
    37 On the Spaces of Guerre Moderne: The French Army in Northern Algeria (1954–1962) Samia Henni Introduction French National Assembly formally recognised On the night of Friday, 13 November 2015, as the the term war by law and authorised the use of the Paris attacks were still unfolding, François Hollande, appellation La Guerre d’Algérie in French schools President of the Fifth Republic stood before national and in official terminology.2 television and declared the closing of the country’s borders and a nationwide état d’urgence (state of In 2015, sixty years after the institution of the emergency). The French media compared these state of emergency, the same extraordinary law attacks with the calamities of World War II, thus is enforced, but it took the French president a few disregarding and undermining the Paris Massacre hours to call the Paris attacks ‘an act of war’, and of 17 October 1961, during La Guerre d’Algérie (the a few days after that to proclaim that ‘France is at Algerian War, 1954–1962), which killed hundreds war’. Hollande and his government, however, had of peaceful Algerian pro-independence protesters no intention of recalling the peculiar character of who had gathered in Paris. The Paris police forces warfare that France waged (and is still waging), a were then under the authority of Maurice Papon, a war that Colonel Roger Trinquier, a French army French civil servant who had served twice in Algeria officer and theorist who served in Algeria, termedla under French colonial rule, and who was convicted guerre moderne (modern warfare).
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Viewing the Battle of Algiers with Germaine Tillion Author(S): Donald Reid Source: History Workshop Journal, No
    Re-Viewing the Battle of Algiers with Germaine Tillion Author(s): Donald Reid Source: History Workshop Journal, No. 60 (Autumn, 2005), pp. 93-115 Published by: Oxford University Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25472817 Accessed: 25-09-2018 11:09 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25472817?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Oxford University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to History Workshop Journal This content downloaded from 130.235.66.10 on Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:09:52 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Germaine Tillion in discussion at St Mande, date and companion unknown. Re-viewing The Battle of Algiers with Germaine Tillion by Donald Reid Whatever the outcome of this Algerian war, it is certain that in fifty years, one hundred years, the Algerians will remember. They will teach their children what that year 1957 was. Legends will be born of the time when the Casbah, the most profound symbol of their community, was night and day under siege, when terror reigned as absolute master, when each of the inhabitants could at any time say: 'In an hour, maybe they will knock on my door and take me away forever Pierre Leulliette, a paratrooper in Algiers1 I learned from the newspapers that in the Algiers Casbah a leader of the FLN [Yacef Saadi] and his young woman companion [Zohra Drif ] were holding out against the assaults of the French army.
    [Show full text]
  • France's War in the Sahel and the Evolution of Counter- Insurgency Doctrine
    The Scholar FRANCE’S WAR IN THE SAHEL AND THE EVOLUTION OF COUNTER- INSURGENCY DOCTRINE Michael Shurkin France’s War in the Sahel and the Evolution of Counter-Insurgency Doctrine Criticism of French military operations in the Sahel region of Africa raises questions about the French army’s heritage of colonial and counter-insurgency (COIN) operations and its relevance today. The French army is heir to practices and doctrines that originated in 19th-century colonial operations and the Cold War. Common features of French approaches have been a de-emphasis on military operations and the need for a population-centric focus that emphasizes economic, psychological, and political actions intended to shore up the legitimacy of the colonial political order. After the conclusion of the Algerian War in 1962, the French maintained some of these practices while slowly adapting to the post-colonial political context. Operation Barkhane, which began in 2014, reflects that new doctrine, meaning that the French military is limiting itself to focusing on security in the anticipation that others will do the political work. This is complicated by the fact that the French presence constitutes a political intervention, even as the French strive to avoid political interference. n Jan. 23, 2020, Gen. François Lecointre, counter-insurgency (COIN) doctrine.1 For Lecoin- chief of the defense staff and France’s tre, the association between contemporary French highest-ranking general, told the Na- military operations and French colonial practices tional Assembly that the French army was a positive one. He hoped to communicate con- knewO what it was doing with Operation Barkhane, fidence and cultivate the trust of the French public the French military intervention in the Sahel that and France’s civilian leaders, assuring them that began in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Failed States and Fragile Societies
    Failed States and Fragile Societies Failed States and Fragile Societies A New World Disorder? Ingo Trauschweizer and Steven M. Miner Editors Ohio University Press Athens Ohio University Press, Athens, Ohio 45701 ohioswallow.com © 2014 by Ohio University Press All rights reserved To obtain permission to quote, reprint, or otherwise reproduce or distribute material from Ohio University Press publications, please contact our rights and permissions department at (740) 593-1154 or (740) 593-4536 (fax). Printed in the United States of America Ohio University Press books are printed on acid-free paper.∞ ™ 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Failed states and fragile societies : a new world disorder? / edited by Ingo Trauschweizer, Steven M. Miner. pages cm. — (Baker series in peace and conflict studies) Summary: “Since the end of the Cold War, a new dynamic has arisen within the international system, one that does not conform to established notions of the state’s monopoly on war. In this changing environment, the global community must decide how to respond to the challenges posed to the state by military threats, political and economic decline, and social fragmentation. This insightful work considers the phenomenon of state failure and asks how the international community might better detect signs of state decay at an early stage and devise legally and politically legitimate responses. This collection of essays brings military and social historians into conversation with political and social scientists and former military officers. In case studies from the former Yugoslavia, Somalia, Iraq, and Colombia, the distinguished contributors argue that early intervention to stabilize social, economic, and political systems offers the greatest promise, whereas military intervention at a later stage is both costlier and less likely to succeed”— Provided by publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • David Galula: His Life and Intellectual Context
    STRATEGIC STUDIES INSTITUTE The Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) is part of the U.S. Army War College and is the strategic level study agent for issues related to national security and military strategy with emphasis on geostrate- gic analysis. The mission of SSI is to use independent analysis to conduct strategic studies that develop policy recommendations on: • Strategy, planning and policy for joint and combined employment of military forces; • Regional strategic appraisals; • The nature of land warfare; • Matters affecting the Army’s future; • The concepts, philosophy, and theory of strategy; and • Other issues of importance to the leadership of the Army. Studies produced by civilian and military analysts concern topics having strategic implications for the Army, the Department of De- fense, and the larger national security community. In addition to its studies, SSI publishes special reports on topics of special or immediate interest. These include edited proceedings of conferences and topically-oriented roundtables, expanded trip re- ports, and quick reaction responses to senior Army leaders. The Institute provides a valuable analytical capability within the Army to address strategic and other issues in support of Army par- ticipation in national security policy formulation. SSI Monograph DAVID GALULA: HIS LIFE AND INTELLECTUAL CONTEXT Ann Marlowe August 2010 Visit our website for other free publication downloads http://www.StrategicStudiesInstitute.army.mil/ To rate this publication click here. The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Depart- ment of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • From Galula to Petraeus
    From Galula to Petraeus the French leGacy in the us counterinsurGency doctrine From Galula To PeTraeus The French leGacy in The us counTerinsurGency docTrine Couverture : portrait stylisé de David Galula (en haut à gauche) et Roger Trinquier (en bas à droite). Tiré de : http://stalner-galerie.blogspot.com Cette étude a été réalisée sous la direction du bureau recherche par le LTN (R) Bertrand VALEYRE et Alexandre GUERIN, chargé d’études au CDEF. PNIA : 821 753 41 61 - Tél. : 01 44 42 52 08 - Fax : 01 44 42 44 66 Courriel : [email protected] contents conTenTsconTenTs inTroducTio inTroducTion .....................................................................................7 ParT one - French reflections about counterinsurgency .............................9 CHAPTER I - RogER TRINQUIER ANd dAvId gALULA, Two FRENCH CoUNTERINsURgENCy PRACTICTIoNERs . 9 1.1 - “Modern warfare” according to Roger Trinquier . 9 1.2 - “Counterinsurgency: Theory and practice” by David Galula. 12 CHAPTER II – FRom TRINQUIER To gALULA, bETwEEN mUTUAL CoNTRIbUTIoN ANd CoNTRAdICTIoNs...............................................................................................................................16 2.1 - Significant core differences.......................................................................................................16 2.2 - Obvious convergences ..............................................................................................................18 2.3 - Thoughts more complementing than conflicting.......................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • John F. Kennedy & the Ascendancy of U.S. Counterinsurgency Doctrine by Ryan Van Koughnett a Thesis Presented to the Universi
    John F. Kennedy & the Ascendancy of U.S. Counterinsurgency Doctrine by Ryan Van Koughnett A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in History Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2018 © Ryan Van Koughnett 2018 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii The formation of a coherent counterinsurgency policy in the United States is often attributed to the administration of President John F. Kennedy. Indeed, through his own personal fascination and promotion of the subject, Kennedy infused funding and expertise into a steadily expanding counterinsurgency apparatus. However, American counterinsurgency doctrine was implanted deeply within military and intelligence institutions and government bureaucracy long before the Camelot era. American conquest by counterinsurgency has a long legacy. The Founding Fathers for Kennedy (to whom this tradition belongs) were Andrew Jackson, William Sherman, William McKinley, Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. As this study argues, periods of American expansion have always been based on the principles of anti-civilian warfare. The history of the United States is one of expansion and primitive accumulation – a process facilitated by methods promoted by presidents spanning the last two centuries. iii Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr. Hunt, Dr. Sbardellati, and Dr. Walker for taking the time to read over this manuscript. Since my re-entry to university, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Pension Restoration
    Cumann na nlar - Oifigeach Coimisiúnta newsletter Association of Retired Commissioned Officers Issue No: 31. Autumn / Winter 2016 ARCO Web Site: www.iarco.info Pension Restoration The Alliance of Retired Public Servants (of which The Alliance believes that the time has now come for revisiting ARCO is an active member) recently sent a letter to pension arrangements. The overwhelming view is that the low level and slow pace of pension restoration under the FEMPI Mr Paschal Donohoe T.D., Minister for Public 2015 Act is wholly inadequate and pensioners have to be Expenditure and Reform highlighting a number of involved, like the public service unions, in official discussions events that occurred in the past few weeks. which now appear imminent in regard to FEMPI and related matters. The issues mentioned were: What is absolutely clear, however, is that the concept of _ the granting of access to Garda organisations to the WRC 150,000 public service pensioners having no access to third party industrial relations machinery, on a permanent or ad hoc and Labour Court; basis, in the event of possible disagreement in due course with _ the Labour Court proposals in relation to GRA and AGSI government about pension restoration and pension increases is increasingly untenable. In effect, pensioners voices are being claims; ‘gagged’ and it is important that pensioners lobby their public _ the subsequent public calls of major public service unions representatives demanding that their voices be heard. Lobbying at a local level is an effective method of ensuring that for urgent revisiting of pay restoration under Landsdowne your concerns are noted and can be fed up to national level.
    [Show full text]