Texas A&M Law Review Volume 7 Issue 2 February 2020 The Press, National Security, and Civil Discourse: How a Federal Shield Law Could Reaffirm Media edibilityCr in an Era of “Fake News” Jenna Johnson Texas A&M University School of Law (Student),
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/lawreview Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, and the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Jenna Johnson, The Press, National Security, and Civil Discourse: How a Federal Shield Law Could Reaffirm Media Credibility in an Era of “Fake News”, 7 Tex. A&M L. Rev. 419 (2020). Available at: https://doi.org/10.37419/LR.V7.I2.4 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Texas A&M Law Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Texas A&M Law Review by an authorized editor of Texas A&M Law Scholarship. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. COMMENTS THE PRESS, NATIONAL SECURITY, AND CIVIL DISCOURSE: HOW A FEDERAL SHIELD LAW COULD REAFFIRM MEDIA CREDIBILITY IN AN ERA OF “FAKE NEWS” By: Jenna Johnson* ABSTRACT The Constitution expressly provides protection for the freedom of the press. Yet there is one area in which the press is not so free: the freedom to refuse disclosing confidential sources when subpoenaed by the federal government. Currently, there is no federal reporter’s privilege. The Supreme Court has held the First Amendment provides no such protection, and repeated congressional attempts to codify a reporter’s privilege in a federal shield law have failed.