Why Cape Town?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Índices De Caminhabilidade Urbana
ÍNDICES DE CAMINHABILIDADE URBANA Aplicação do projeto IAAPE ao planeamento urbano André Filipe Tomás Ferreira Dissertação para obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Engenharia Civil Orientador: Prof. Doutor Filipe Manuel Mercier Vilaça e Moura Orientadora: Prof.a Ana dos Santos Morais de Sá Júri Presidente: Prof. Doutor João Torres de Quinhones Levy Orientadora: Prof.a Ana dos Santos Morais de Sá Vogal: Prof. Doutor Jorge Manuel Lopes Baptista e Silva Junho de 2017 ÍNDICES DE CAMINHABILIDADE URBANA: Aplicação do projeto IAAPE ao planeamento urbano 73260 – André Filipe Tomás Ferreira RESUMO E PALAVRAS-CHAVE O intenso processo de urbanização ocorrido nos últimos anos tem tido repercussões importantes no comportamento das pessoas, nomeadamente nas suas deslocações pedonais. Nos últimos anos o tema dos modos ativos de deslocação, em especial o modo pedonal, tem assumido um papel cada vez mais importante devido aos inúmeros benefícios que estes trazem para a saúde pública, para o ambiente, para a cidade, entre outros, tendo sido alvo de diversos estudos. Contudo a caminhabilidade tem sido essencialmente abordada no ambiente já construído, não havendo estudos realizados nos processos de planeamento urbano em relação a esta temática, em Portugal. Esta dissertação utiliza uma metodologia proposta pelo projeto IAAPE (Indicadores de Acessibilidade e Atratividade PEdonal) para realizar uma avaliação da caminhabilidade na Cidade Universitária, em Lisboa. Numa primeira fase avaliou-se a situação atual, a partir da qual foi possível concluir que a Cidade Universitária devido à sua especificidade de usos é acessível, mas pouco atrativa. Numa segunda fase, avaliaram-se as propostas incluídas no Plano de Pormenor para a Cidade Universitária (ainda em fase de elaboração) o que permitiu concluir que o Plano traria melhorias significativas na questão da caminhabilidade, em especial da atratividade da zona. -
An Audit of a Diverse Community for Safe Routes to Age in Place Environmental Policy Implications Adriana Perez, Phd, ANP-BC, FAAN; Anamarie Garces, MPH; Rebecca H
Public Policy An Audit of a Diverse Community for Safe Routes to Age in Place Environmental Policy Implications Adriana Perez, PhD, ANP-BC, FAAN; Anamarie Garces, MPH; Rebecca H. Hunter, MEd; and David X. Marquez, PhD ABSTRACT Physical and cognitive limitations of- ten accompany aging, increasing the importance of a safe and supportive environment to help older adults maintain mobility. Neighborhood design and maintenance must be evaluated to promote physical activ- ity, mobility, and safety. Audit tools, geographic information system data, and resident interviews are used for this purpose, but often fail to provide information that can be translated to practice. The current project is part of a larger Miami-Dade Age-Friendly Ini- tiative to create a metropolitan area that fosters a healthy environment for diverse adults of all ages and abili- ties. Safe Routes uses a toolkit based on the 5-E model providing practical © 2015 Shutterstock.com/kamira resources to guide stakeholders in ABOUT THE AUTHORS meeting the needs of the commu- Dr. Perez is Assistant Professor and Southwest Boarderlands Scholar, College of Nurs- nity. Findings include the Centers ing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona; Ms. Garces is Partner, Urban Health Solutions LLC, and Executive Director, Urban Health Partner- for Disease Control Healthy Aging ships, Inc., Miami, Florida; Dr. Hunter is Research Associate, University of North Carolina Research Network Audit Tool assess- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and Dr. Marquez is Associate Professor, Depart- ment for environmental walkability ment of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. -
Informal Settlement Upgrading in Cape Town’S Hangberg: Local Government, Urban Governance and the ‘Right to the City’
Informal Settlement Upgrading in Cape Town’s Hangberg: Local Government, Urban Governance and the ‘Right to the City’ by Walter Vincent Patrick Fieuw Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy in Sustainable Development Planning and Management in the Faculty of Economics and Management Sciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Dr Firoz Khan December 2011 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Signature Walter Fieuw Name in full 22/11/2011 Date Copyright © 2011 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract Integrating the poor into the fibre of the city is an important theme in housing and urban policies in post‐apartheid South Africa. In other words, the need for making place for the ‘black’ majority in urban spaces previously reserved for ‘whites’ is premised on notions of equity and social change in a democratic political dispensation. However, these potentially transformative thrusts have been eclipsed by more conservative, neoliberal developmental trajectories. Failure to transform apartheid spatialities has worsened income distribution, intensified suburban sprawl, and increased the daily livelihood costs of the poor. After a decade of unintended consequences, new policy directives on informal settlements were initiated through Breaking New Ground (DoH 2004b). -
Main Street South Pedestrian Safety Study
MAIN STREET SOUTH PEDESTRIAN SAFETY STUDY SOUTHBURY, CONNECTICUT MAY 2020 MAIN STREET SOUTH PAGE | 1 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY STUDY This study is dedicated to the memory of DeLoris Curtis (1940 – 2020) “She took great pride in how Southbury got developed for future generations. She spent 40 years working for the Town of Southbury in various roles, most recently as the certified AICP planning administrator… The next time you take a walk down Main Street, look at the beautiful trees, flowers and sidewalk; think of her…” SOUTHBURY, CT MAY 2020 MAIN STREET SOUTH PAGE | 2 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Study Purpose ………………………………………………………………...………... page 3 2. Background ..…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. page 4 3. Existing Conditions …………………………………………………………….…………………………………. page 8 4. Recommended Improvements ………………………………………………………………...…………... page 16 5. Preliminary Cost-estimates ………………………………………………………………………...……….... page 36 6. Safety benefits of Recommended Improvements ………………………………………………... page 40 7. Next Steps ………………………………………………………………………...………………………………….. page 41 Appendix ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..…....…. page 43 SOUTHBURY, CT MAY 2020 MAIN STREET SOUTH PAGE | 3 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY STUDY 1. INTRODUCTION AND STUDY PURPOSE The Town of Southbury is seeking to improve pedestrian safety along Main Street South from Route 172 (South Britain Road & Georges Hill Road) to U.S. Route 6 (Main Street North). This approximately 1.8 mile stretch of Main Street South includes seven signalized intersections, many unsignalized intersections/driveways, a number of crosswalks (two at unsignalized locations), much of the town’s commercial base, some residential buildings, the Southbury Green, municipal/town government buildings and the Pomperaug Elementary School. The Rochambeau Middle School and adjacent neighborhoods are also in the vicinity of Main Street South. As the Town of Southbury seeks to improve the livability and safety of residents, employees, and visitors, it has undertaken this study with the aid of Milone & MacBroom, Inc. -
History of the EDP | a Case Study
September 2014 No. 1 Case Study Series The EDP story – building partnerships to boost the regional economy Prepared by the Western Cape Economic Development Partnership (EDP). Introduction The Economic Development Partnership (EDP) was launched on 26 April 2012 as a collaborative intermediary organisation. Its mandate is to build, monitor, teach and support partnerships in order to improve the performance of the Western Cape’s economic development system and to foster a more competitive, inclusive and resilient regional economy. History business and civil society, and what was actually needed were structured partnerships. In October 2010, the Cape Town Partnership, The concept of an Economic Development under the leadership of Andrew Boraine, was Partnership (EDP) was taken to the Western celebrating the city’s successful participation Cape Government Cabinet, which accepted in the 2010 World Cup when new economic the proposal in August 2011. development MEC Alan Winde called to discuss the performance of the economic Alan Winde gave Boraine a year to get the EDP agencies in the Western Cape. Winde thought up and running, and he, together with Yumnaa that these agencies were underperforming, Firfirey, quickly got to work with a series of and asked Boraine to explore a model for road shows, first talking to all the government the restructuring of the various agencies bodies from DEDAT to Wesgro and the sector into a single economic development agency. development agencies. The discussion was Boraine and his team looked at the possibility broadened and potential partners included all of amalgamating all the government-funded levels of government (national, provincial and agencies but eventually went back to Winde local), municipal managers and mayors, the to suggest that while culling overheads was main business associations, the region’s four important, the biggest problem was that universities, social movements and organised government was not engaging properly with labour. -
ANNUAL REPORT APRIL 2013–MARCH 2014 Vision: the Creation of Sustainable Human Settlements Through Development Processes Which Enable Human Rights, Dignity and Equity
ANNUAL REPORT APRIL 2013–MARCH 2014 Vision: The creation of sustainable human settlements through development processes which enable human rights, dignity and equity. Mission: To create, implement and support opportunities for community-centred settlement development and to advocate for and foster a pro-poor policy environment which addresses economic, social and spatial imbalances. Umzomhle (Nyanga), Mncediisi Masakhane, RR Section, Participatory Action Planning CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ANC African National Congress KCT Khayelitsha Community Trust BESG Built Environment Support Group KDF Khayelitsha Development Forum Abbreviations 2 BfW Brot für die Welt KHP Khayelitsha Housing Project CBO Community-Based Organisation KHSF Khayelitsha Human Settlements Our team 3 CLP Community Leadership Programme Forum Board of Directors 4 CoCT City of Cape Town (Metropolitan) LED Local economic development Chairperson’s report 5 CORC Community Organisation Resource LRC Legal Resources Centre Centre MIT Massachusetts Institute of Executive Director’s report 6 CBP Capacity-Building Programme Technology From vision to strategy 9 CPUT Cape Peninsula University of NDHS National Department of Human Technology Settlements Affordable housing and human settlements 15 CSO Civil Society Organisation NGO Non-Governmental Organisation Building capacity in the urban sector 20 CTP Cape Town Partnership NDP National Development Plan Partnerships 23 DA Democratic Alliance NUSP National Upgrading Support DAG Development Action Group Programme Institutional change 25 DPU -
Pioneer Square Walking Audit
Pioneer Square Walking Audit DRAFTObservations & Recommendations April 20, 2012 Early one Tuesday morning in February, more than 40 people, representing residents, business, property owners and city departments, gathered in Occidental Park. Their goal: to understand what makes Pioneer Square a terrific place to be and to identify the opportunities for making it better. Their method: audit the streets and alleys of Pioneer Square. They set out on three different routes with a map, clipboard, a list of questions and a camera. They covered every corner of Pioneer Square, and they were prolific observers. These long-term residents and business owners created more than 40 pages of notes and took hundreds of photographs. Participants scored each route in three categories: getting there (finding your way and accessibility), wanting to stay (quality of public spaces and appearance) and feeling comfortable (quality of sidewalks and feeling of safety). Scores range from 1 representing poor to 5 being excellent. The result is an unprecedented inventory of Pioneer Square’s promises and challenges. The International Sustainability culled from this data what’s most important to those who work, live and play in Pioneer Square. You’ll find lots of quick wins and short term projects to support an economically vibrant neighborhood. If you have additional comments or ideas, please email [email protected]. project of PIONEER SQUARE ACTIVE STREETS prepared by the International Sustainability Institute 1.9 getting there 1.9 getting there SCORES 2.3 wanting to stay (1-5) Pioneer Square Walking Audit | ROUTE 1 | 2.5 feeling comfortable Transit & Neighborhood Connections: Occidental Park to Chinatown/ID and Transit Hub Uwajimaya 5th Ave ID 5 Assets & Promise Tunnel + Great Connection: between Chinatown/ID & Pioneer Square Union Station 4th Ave 4 Weller Bridge & 3 Sounder Entry + Transit Hub: brings people into Pioneer Square via numerous transit options (train, bus and light rail) 2 King St. -
Walking Audit Report
[This page was intentionally left blank.] Page 2 • City of Lauderhill Walking Audit Report ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Partners The Broward MPO would like to extend special thanks to the City of Lauderhill’s Commission and the School Administration at Lauderhill 6-12 STEM-MED Magnet Program. Dr. Reardon graciously allowed the event to be hosted within the school and the school administrators including Ms. Gina Montagnino and Leticia Mercado helped to organize the logistics and student-participation. City of Lauderhill Commissioner Thurston actively participated and Mayor Kaplan and Commissioner Bates attended the presentation, showing support for the Complete Streets-oriented workshop. The Broward MPO extend their gratitude to the more than 60 individuals who participated in the Walking Audit, and to the City of Lauderhill’s staff, both Earl Hahn and Molly Howson, for their assistance in preparing for the event. Roughly thirty students, from Lauderhill 6-12 provided the unique perspectives of young community members who use active transportation in the area almost every day, by walking to and from the school. Additional community support came from local agencies and nonprofit partners such as: Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Department of Health (FDOH) Broward Office, Broward Regional Health Planning Council’s (BRHPC) Transforming Our Community’s Health (TOUCH) Initiative partners, Broward Metropolitan Planning Organization (Broward MPO), AARP, Broward County Transit (BCT), and many others. The Broward MPO appreciates everyone’s participation -
Ja D C M B G Ill a Rs R
. e Dr . Park Ridg e Harrison D v r. A t M l u Morton Ave. l C lfo a r t d W . F . s y y e . Klos W . e Hill y e top Dr. W W v A d s Dr Stanton Ave. o la . n il o r i n l a l C w D z r e o n a ucero idg e C . A R M r v m D e u Mi . l ner o . Ave c B . l y. d u W R Joh ap r. e l n A c D id r. l ve. A la s w D a o e ie M an e v . p e H p Es r v t ro to T G i ll S l i Ga H rrity W ate lv y. h hg Dr. t g i . Hi e y 1 Pa w 1 bl w Pa o Vi H Pk lmer sta A ir. D ill Ave. ve. C r to d ew . p D on evi r. m at r. h G D Mckenz ic Co ller ie D R nnec Mi . r. ticu t y on Dr. t Ave. er Gilm Henders b W a D Ro r. a l A r. r airmede D l F E . t . t n r. a e e W D S e y. M v d . m M Wiswall D . r o h r u r A e ro ll . e i d t D n G s r b D 4 r a R Ri o B r. -
Practical Tools and Innovative Strategies for Creating Great Communities Speaker Biographies
14th Annual New Partners for Smart Growth: Practical Tools and Innovative Strategies for Creating Great Communities Speaker Biographies Azibuike Akaba Azibuike Akaba, Public Health Institute, is currently a policy Analyst that manages an environmental program that includes air quality; land use, transportation and public health policy. Currently he is a consultant for the AB32 Environmental Justice Advisory Board for the California Air Resources Board. Mustafa Ali Mustafa is a founding member of the Office of Environmental Justice (OEJ) and has a played major role in the design and implementation of many of EPA’s most successful programs focused on environmental justice and community revitalization. He currently serves as the Acting Senior Advisor to the Administrator for Environmental Justice. In this role Mustafa helps to elevate EJ issues to the highest levels of the Agency. Shirronda Almeida Shirronda Almeida, MACDC Director of Membership Initiatives, assists CDCs in improving their capacity as community resources through the Mel King Institute for Community Building. The Institute provides professional education and other learning opportunities for community development leadership, staff and board members. John Anderson John Anderson is a builder, developer, planner, and urbanist. Prior to the Great Recession he was the director of planning and design for New Urban Builders in Chico and Redding, where the firm has demonstrated that California production builders can build sustainable neighborhoods. In 2009 John and his partner David Kim formed Anderson / Kim Architecture + Urban Design with offices in Albuquerque and NYC. The firm specializes in infill design and development. Kate Ange Katharine Ange, AICP is a Principal and Vice President with Renaissance Planning Group. -
Economic Growth Strategy
ECONOMIC GROWTH STRATEGY CITY OF CAPE TOWN Prepared by STRATEGIC POLICY UNIT OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE MAYOR July 2013 1 CONTENTS Executive Summary 3 The Economy of Cape Town 5 The Challenge of Growth And Jobs 6 A Different Path: The Opportunity City 9 1. A Globally Competitive City 11 Competitiveness Strategies 13 2. Infrastructure for Growth 17 Infrastructure Strategies 19 3. Inclusive Growth through Jobs and Skills 26 Inclusion Strategies 28 4. Trade Promotion and Sector Development 34 Trade Promotion and Sector Development Strategies 37 5. Sustaining Growth for the Future 43 Sustainable Growth Strategies 46 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The principal objective of the Economic Growth Strategy (EGS) is to grow the economy and create jobs - the overarching objective of the Opportunity City. It presents the City of Cape Town’s response to the most fundamental challenges facing Cape Town in the years ahead: too many people are unemployed, too many people are poor, and the city’s lacklustre current and projected growth rates means that this situation is unlikely to change if the organisation follows a ‘business as usual’ approach. At the same time, demand for city services is increasing every year. This trajectory will be unsustainable in the long-term unless incomes rise, and City revenue from households and businesses increases. The EGS marks a departure from previous approaches to the economy by the City in that it adopts a ‘whole organisation’ approach. Previously, economic development had been relegated to a relatively small and under-resources department, which focussed its attention on a number of discrete projects. -
IRPA-14 (9-13 May 2016, Cape Town, South Africa
celebrating50 years Bid to host the 14th International Congresss of the International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA), 9-13 May 2016 Cape Town, South Africa TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ENDORSEMENT LETTERS ....................................................................................... 3 2. OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................ 13 3. SOUTH AFRICA ........................................................................................................ 21 4. WHY CAPE TOWN .................................................................................................... 27 5. PROFESSIONAL DESTINATION SUPPORT ............................................................. 33 6. CAPE TOWN YOUR HOST CITY ............................................................................... 36 7. THE CONFERENCE I. Accommodation .................................................................................................... 48 II. The Venue ............................................................................................................... 54 III. Social Programme ............................................................................................... 61 8. DAY TOURS .............................................................................................................. 67 9. PRE AND POST TOURS ........................................................................................... 71 10. BESTCITIES .............................................................................................................