Nabors Forrest Andrew Phd20

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nabors Forrest Andrew Phd20 THE PROBLEM OF RECONSTRUCTION: THE POLITICAL REGIME OF THE ANTEBELLUM SLAVE SOUTH by FORREST ANDREW NABORS A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Political Science and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2011 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Forrest Andrew Nabors Title: The Problem of Reconstruction: The Political Regime of The Antebellum Slave South This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Political Science by: Gerald Berk Chairman Deborah Baumgold Member Joseph Lowndes Member James Mohr Outside Member and Richard Linton Vice President for Research and Graduate Studies/Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2011 ii © 2011 Forrest Andrew Nabors iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Forrest Andrew Nabors Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science June 2011 Title: The Problem of Reconstruction: The Political Regime of the Antebellum Slave South Approved: _______________________________________________ Dr. Gerald Berk This project studies the general political character of the antebellum slave South from the perspective of Republicans who served in the Reconstruction Congress from 1863-1869. In most Reconstruction literature, the question of black American freedom and citizenship was the central issue of Reconstruction, but not to the Republicans. The question of black American freedom and citizenship was the most salient issue to them, but they set that issue within a larger problem: the political regime of the antebellum slave South had deviated from the plan of the American Founders long before secession in 1860-1861. The American Founders had attempted to establish natural rights republicanism in the nation. The slave South section of the nation had transformed into an oligarchic political regime. The higher aim of the Republicans was regime change and the re-union of the nation on the restored principles of natural rights republicanism. To show this, I first recover the Republicans’ common analysis of the slave South, drawing from the writings and speeches of Reconstruction Republican Congressmen. I present their overlapping points of analysis and organize their analyses by the traditional theory of political regimes. I divide their analyses into the form of the iv oligarchic regime, the cause (slavery), and how the oligarchy historically developed since the founding period. Secondly, I study the slave South in three institutional dimensions. According to the Republicans, the oligarchy depended upon specific institutional arrangements in education, property, and the organization of state government. Critically drawing upon a broad array of secondary scholarship, I test their claims by examining how education, property, and government supported oligarchic rule in the slave South. My analysis concurs with the Republicans. My conclusion advances a two- regime theory of American Political Development. Reconstruction was a continuing act in a long 19th century inter-regime struggle between republicanism and a revolutionary oligarchy rising from the slaveholding South. v CURRICULUM VITAE NAME OF AUTHOR: Forrest Andrew Nabors GRADUATE AND UNDERGRADUATE SCHOOLS ATTENDED: University of Oregon, Eugene University of Chicago Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, California DEGREES AWARDED: Doctor of Philosophy, Political Science, 2011, University of Oregon Master of Science, Political Science, 2008, University of Oregon Bachelor of Arts, General Studies in the Humanities, 1993, University of Chicago AREAS OF SPECIAL INTEREST: American Government Political Philosophy PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Visiting Assistant Professor in Political Theory, Department of Political Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 2009-2010 Instructor, Department of Political Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, 2008-2011 Instructor, Department of Political Science, Linfield College, McMinnville, Oregon, 2009 Instructor, Social Science Division, Lane Community College, Eugene, Oregon, 2009 Graduate Teaching Fellow, Department of Political Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, 2004-2008 vi Vice President, Sales and Marketing, Learning.com, Portland, Oregon, 1999-2004 Director of Product Management, Chrome Systems Corporation, Portland, Oregon, 1997-1999 Vice President, Marketing, Western Reliance Corporation, Portland, Oregon, 1995-1997 GRANTS, AWARDS, AND HONORS: Lehrman American Studies Summer Institute Fellowship, in conjunction with the James Madison Program at Princeton University, 2011. vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For years my friends and family endured my never-ending reformulations of a plan to escape a comfortable business career, return to academia, earn a doctorate and become a professor. I am very grateful for their encouragement, patience and support, especially from my children Will, Emma and Harrison, my brother Scott H. Nabors, my mother Nancy Gail Smith, my father and stepmother Mr. and Mrs. William H. Nabors, my uncle and aunt Dr. and Mrs. Ward T. Smith, my dear friends Bryan and Karen Dawson, the Adler family, Ross and Rosalie MacDonald, Professor Harry Veryser, Dawn F. Graves, Debasis Bhattacharya, Professor Sean Parson, and Professor Patricia Dewey. My undergraduate professors, James H. Nichols, Jr. of Claremont McKenna College, William B. Allen, formerly of Harvey Mudd College, and Herman Sinaiko of the University of Chicago, went out of their way to support my dream to return to academia after a long lapse of time. My friends at Learning.com at first did not understand, but accepted my plan to exit the company for the Ivory Tower. They aided me in many ways to ease my transition to life in graduate school. Distinguished Hillsdale College Professors Robert Eden and Paul Rahe encouraged the direction of my research, when it seemed I could only convince my friends, family and myself of the worthiness of my project. Their thoughtful comments and honest criticism of my work are very appreciated. The political science faculty at the University of Oregon made me feel welcome here, even though my philosophical and political persuasions often depart from theirs. Professors Gerald Berk, Joseph Lowndes and Julie Novkov carefully considered and viii challenged my work, and invited frequent, friendly repartee. I am grateful for their advice, recommendations, comments, referrals and good humor. I was quite fortunate that a highly regarded history professor agreed to join my dissertation committee. Professor James Mohr helped orient my political science dissertation to the literature in his discipline, which improved my studies a great deal. My meeting with Professor Deborah Baumgold in the spring of 2004 convinced me to seriously consider attending the University of Oregon. In my years here she has supported me in every direction and in every way, professional and personal. Among my graduate school colleagues, we always knew that we could depend on her. The spiritual counsel, patriotic inspiration, and the occasional, loving kick from Pastor Michael Jaskilka, 1st Lt., USMC (Ret.), propelled me through graduate studies. He reminded me that we serve purposes greater than ourselves, and to keep going. When I was a headstrong, twelve year-old football player in Fair Haven, New Jersey, Will Morrisey gradually introduced me to great books and great teachers. In time, thanks to Will, I could stand on my own two feet in the gallery of the masters, and he and I can meet there now, as friends. To him I owe the rarest debt of gratitude. Although I have not spent as much time as I wished with Professor Harry V. Jaffa, he has been the North Star of my thoughts about philosophy and America. His achievements are more than an academic treasure but a national treasure, in my view, and my respect for him has grown with time. A long time ago his influence sealed my resolution to pursue an academic life and more recently, to research and write this dissertation. ix For Professor Harry V. Jaffa, Mr. Alec Saunders, Mr. Martin Adler, and my grandmother, Mrs. Kathryn Tolbert Smith. x TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 Southern Oligarchy, The Problem of Reconstruction ......................................... 1 The Central Issue of Reconstruction in Scholarship ........................................... 3 Antebellum Southern Oligarchy or Aristocracy in Scholarly Literature.............. 9 Methodological Approach ................................................................................. 19 Summary of Aristotelian Regime Theory........................................................... 21 The American Founders’ Natural Rights Republicanism.................................... 26 Dissertation Organization .................................................................................. 42 II. THE GENERAL CHARACTER OF SOUTHERN OLIGARCHY ..................... 44 The Problem of Reconstruction Officially Expressed by the Republican Congress Immediately After the Civil War .................................................. 44 The Ruling Class ............................................................................................... 49 The Southern Oligarchy’s White Vassal Class ..................................................
Recommended publications
  • Your Name Here
    MARTHA SCHOFIELD AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WOMAN’S AUTONOMOUS LIFE: 1858-1870 by MELANIE ROSEANNE PAVICH (Under the Direction of Ronald E. Butchart) ABSTRACT Martha Schofield was a Quaker, a teacher, and a woman who came of age at the beginning of the Civil War. She began teaching in 1858 both to contribute to her family’s income and in answer to what she came to believe was her life’s calling. Along with abolitionism, women’s rights, and temperance were among the causes she and her family supported. In addition, her mother was a Quaker minister, often travelling from home to preach as well as to lecture. During the war Martha taught in a school for free blacks in Philadelphia and volunteered as a hospital worker and nurse. Her influences were many for women’s contributions in a reforming and expanded post-war world, including Lucretia Mott, Anna Dickinson, and Susan B. Anthony. At the same time, Martha hoped to become a wife and mother but that was not to be. Instead, with failing health she ventured south, first to coastal South Carolina and eventually to the town of Aiken, to dedicate her life to the uplift of former slaves. By 1871, she established what would become the Schofield Normal and Industrial School in Aiken, living and working there until her death in 1916. Through choice and circumstances, Martha Schofield became a freedmen’s teacher, established a school, and secured its success through her business and fundraising skills. For most of her adult life, she worked tirelessly for the rights of African Americans and women.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Silver"; Montana's Political Dream of Economic Prosperity, 1864-1900
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1969 "Free silver"; Montana's political dream of economic prosperity, 1864-1900 James Daniel Harrington The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Harrington, James Daniel, ""Free silver"; Montana's political dream of economic prosperity, 1864-1900" (1969). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 1418. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1418 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "FREE SILVER MONTANA'S POLITICAL DREAM OF ECONOMIC PROSPERITY: 1864-19 00 By James D. Harrington B. A. Carroll College, 1961 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1969 Approved by: Chairman, Board of Examiners . /d . Date UMI Number: EP36155 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Disaartation Publishing UMI EP36155 Published by ProQuest LLC (2012). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author.
    [Show full text]
  • Cenotaphs Would Suggest a Friendship, Clay Begich 11 9 O’Neill Historic Congressional Cemetery and Calhoun Disliked Each Other in Life
    with Henry Clay and Daniel Webster he set the terms of every important debate of the day. Calhoun was acknowledged by his contemporaries as a legitimate successor to George Washington, John Adams or Thomas Jefferson, but never gained the Revised 06.05.2020 presidency. R60/S146 Clinton 2 3 Tracy 13. HENRY CLAY (1777–1852) 1 Latrobe 4 Blount Known as the “Great Compromiser” for his ability to bring Thornton 5 others to agreement, he was the founder and leader of the Whig 6 Anderson Party and a leading advocate of programs for modernizing the economy, especially tariffs to protect industry, and a national 7 Lent bank; and internal improvements to promote canals, ports and railroads. As a war hawk in Congress demanding the War of Butler 14 ESTABLISHED 1807 1812, Clay made an immediate impact in his first congressional term, including becoming Speaker of the House. Although the 10 Boggs Association for the Preservation of closeness of their cenotaphs would suggest a friendship, Clay Begich 11 9 O’Neill Historic Congressional Cemetery and Calhoun disliked each other in life. Clay 12 Brademas 8 R60/S149 Calhoun 13 14. ANDREW PICKENS BUTLER (1796–1857) Walking Tour As the nation drifted toward war between the states, tensions CENOTAPHS rose even in the staid Senate Chamber of the U.S. Congress. When Senator Charles Sumner of Massachusetts disparaged Senator Andrew Butler of South Carolina (who was not istory comes to life in Congressional present) during a floor speech, Representative Preston Brooks Cemetery. The creak and clang of the of South Carolina, Butler’s cousin, took umbrage and returned wrought iron gate signals your arrival into to the Senate two days later and beat Sumner severely with a the early decades of our national heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • 3:00 Pm Meeting Minutes Members Present
    Capitol Complex Advisory Council December 2, 2015 Room 152 Capitol Building 1:00 – 3:00 p.m. Meeting Minutes Members Present: Sheila Hogan, Chairperson, Department of Administration Denise King, Montana Historical Society Senator Bradley Hamlett Senator Debbie Barrett (via telephone conference call) Representative Wendy McCamey Representative Jean Price (via telephone conference call) Liz Gans, Montana Arts Council Carol Williams Sheena Wilson Staff: Angie Gifford, Department of Administration Monica Abbott, Department of Administration Jennifer Bottomly-O'looney, Montana Historical Society Kim Hurtle, Montana Arts Council Public: Kevin Keeler Call to Order and Introductions – Chairperson Sheila Hogan Sheila Hogan called the meeting to order and asked for introductions from those in attendance, including those calling into the meeting. Review of Operating Procedures – Angie Gifford, CCAC Staff Angie Gifford reviewed the Operating Procedures. Approval of November 10, 2014 minutes – Chairperson Sheila Hogan Denise King offered a motion to approve the minutes from the November 10, 2014 meeting. Sheena Wilson seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Overview of Role of the Capitol Complex Advisory Council (CCAC) – Angie Gifford, CCAC Staff Angie Gifford summarized the role of the advisory council. She also listed the recent legislative bills that placed new art in the Capitol and on the complex. She spoke of the CCAC Master Plan and the Art and Memorial Plan that was established by the council. Women’s Mural presentation – Denise King, Montana Historical Society o Location The mural is on the third floor of the capitol on the east and west walls at the top of the grand staircase. 1 o Design The artist was Hadley Ferguson from Missoula.
    [Show full text]
  • A University Microfilms International
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • The GOP AFTER the BIG ELEPHANTS, WHAT?
    RIPON New Monthly Format FEBRUARY, 1978 VOL. XIV, No.2 50 cents Conunenlary: The GOP AFTER THE BIG ELEPHANTS, WHAT? In Michigan, the political fate from a shortage of intestinal fortitude. of the Republican Party rests on Gov. Clark and fellow Sen. John Culver (D) , William Mi11iken(R). In Iowa, it after all, have the most liberal voting rests on Gov. RObert Ray. In Maine, records in the country, according to on U.S.Rep. William Cohen. The three Americans for Democratic Action. And men are merely the most prominent Clark only last year began to pay as­ symbols of the GOP's "Big Elephant" siduous attention to constituent con­ problem. ems after years of neglect. Clark's "unbeatable" reputation hardly seems The symptoms are not apparent to square with his record: one win in in every state, but they are wide­ one try. But Clark knocked of incum­ spread enough to be of national con­ bent Sen. Jack Mi11er(R) in the "Repub­ cern. Milliken, Ray, and Cohen are lican year" of 1972 so he looks more all phenomenally popular vote-getters. scary than his liberal record in a As a result, the "Republican Parties moderate-conservative state might oth­ in their respective states tends to erwise indicate. revolve around their decisions. All three were their partie~ best hopes to run for either the Senate or gov­ ernorship this year. In Milliken's and Ray's cases, when they opted not to seek a new legislative career in Washington, their parties searched frantically for alternative candi­ dates. In Iowa, that search was parti­ cularly frustrating.
    [Show full text]
  • 1924-09-11, [P ]
    THE WOLF POINT HERALD «««’.HÎffilMONTANA iOeiETY OF PION R FOIRTY- H0W F- “SANDBAR m SAYS SLADE WAS ~ --“ BROWN GOT HIS m CASCADE PIONEER WORKED ON SECRETARY OP THE MONTANA SLADE’S CLALM AT TIME OF PIONEERS EXPLAINS WHAT “SANDBAR” MEANS VIGILANTE ACTIVITIES UTTE recently enjoyed the hon- territory May 26, 1864, are cordially j eye was noted as white-haired men'lips; Mrs.| A. Trask, Powell; Henry j Indian Episode on Famous Old Min­ Pleads the Cause of Montana’s First or and the pleasure of playing invited to attend a meeting to be and women who crossed the plains Buek, Ravalli; J. W. Culbertson, souri, In Which 3 Reds were Slain Governor; Says that Sidney Edg- B host to one of the most re- held at the courthouse in the city of J behind ox teams, slept with pistols Richland; S. H. Erwin, Rosebud; On a Sandbar Is the Real Source markable organizations in the nation, Helena, the capital of the territory, under their pillows, lived in dugouts ; A. J. Lansing, Sanders; Levi S. erton Was Not Given Fair Chance the Montan Society of Pioneers! on Wednesday, September 19, 1884, j and log cabins, and fought with na-; Wild, Silver Bow; Edwin Burke, of Peculiar Cognomen. In the Early Days. Composed of men and women who at 10 a. m„ (the day being during j ture In the raw, to add another star i Stillwater; Mrs. L. J. Daggett, To- may by common consent be called fair week), for the purpose of or-1 to the galaxy of states, answered ton; Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present
    CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Schuyler Colfax Papers, 1843-1884
    Collection # M 0055 OM 0101 SCHUYLER COLFAX PAPERS, 1843–1884 Collection Information Biographical Sketch Scope and Content Note Calendar of Correspondence Series Contents Cataloging Information Processed by Charles Latham December 1988, April 1991 Chris Harter 20 January 1998 Updated by Emily Castle 19 July 2005 Manuscript and Visual Collections Department William Henry Smith Memorial Library Indiana Historical Society 450 West Ohio Street Indianapolis, IN 46202-3269 www.indianahistory.org COLLECTION INFORMATION VOLUME OF 1 manuscript box, 1 oversized folder, 2 cartes de visite COLLECTION: COLLECTION 1843-1884 DATES: PROVENANCE: Several purchases from a number of sources between 1940-1998 RESTRICTIONS: None COPYRIGHT: REPRODUCTION Permission to reproduce or publish material in this collection RIGHTS: must be obtained from the Indiana Historical Society. ALTERNATE FORMATS: RELATED HOLDINGS: ACCESSION 1939.0503; 2000.0308; complete list available in accession file NUMBER: NOTES: This is an open collection. Material will be added as it becomes available. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Schuyler Colfax (1823-1885) was born in New York City, the son of Schuyler and Hannah Stryker Colfax. His father died before his son's birth, and in 1834 his mother married George Matthews. Two years later the family moved to New Carlisle, Indiana, just west of South Bend. After education in local schools, Colfax began his political career by assisting his stepfather, auditor of South Bend, as deputy auditor from 1841 to 1849. He also served as assistant enrolling clerk of the state Senate in 1842-1844. He married Evelyn Chase in 1844. He combined politics with newspaper work and began working as a correspondent for the Indiana State Journal.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Southern Montana
    History of Southern Montana Alva J. (Al) Noyes History of Southern Montana Table of Contents History of Southern Montana..................................................................................................................................1 Alva J. (Al) Noyes.........................................................................................................................................2 INTRODUCTORY........................................................................................................................................3 Chapter I. Early History.................................................................................................................................4 CHAPTER II. The First Charter....................................................................................................................6 CHAPTER III. Lumber..................................................................................................................................8 CHAPTER IV. The Lost City......................................................................................................................10 CHAPTER V. First Probate Judge...............................................................................................................12 CHAPTER VI. Jeff. Davis Gulch................................................................................................................13 CHAPTER VII.............................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School College of The
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts CITIES AT WAR: UNION ARMY MOBILIZATION IN THE URBAN NORTHEAST, 1861-1865 A Dissertation in History by Timothy Justin Orr © 2010 Timothy Justin Orr Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2010 The dissertation of Timothy Justin Orr was reviewed and approved* by the following: Carol Reardon Professor of Military History Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Director of Graduate Studies in History Mark E. Neely, Jr. McCabe-Greer Professor in the American Civil War Era Matthew J. Restall Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Colonial Latin American History, Anthropology, and Women‘s Studies Carla J. Mulford Associate Professor of English *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ii ABSTRACT During the four years of the American Civil War, the twenty-three states that comprised the Union initiated one of the most unprecedented social transformations in U.S. History, mobilizing the Union Army. Strangely, scholars have yet to explore Civil War mobilization in a comprehensive way. Mobilization was a multi-tiered process whereby local communities organized, officered, armed, equipped, and fed soldiers before sending them to the front. It was a four-year progression that required the simultaneous participation of legislative action, military administration, benevolent voluntarism, and industrial productivity to function properly. Perhaps more than any other area of the North, cities most dramatically felt the affects of this transition to war. Generally, scholars have given areas of the urban North low marks. Statistics refute pessimistic conclusions; northern cities appeared to provide a higher percentage than the North as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • The Descendants of Job Atterbury
    THE DESCENDANTS OF JOB ATTERBURY BY L. EFFINGHAM de FOREST, M.A., J.D., F.S.G., F.I.A.G. AND ANNE LAWRENCE de FOREST THE DE FOREST PUBLISHING COMPANY NEw YoRic, N. Y. 1933 CoPnIG:e:T, 1933, BY L. EFl"IHGBAK J>E FOllEST This work is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without permission in writing from the authors. REARRANGED AND REPRINTED FROM: ATTERBURY AND ALLIED F AKILIES (1933) BY L. EFFINGHAM DE FOREST As AUTHOR: Dommerich, Hall and Allied Families (1924). Ballard and Allied Families (1924). The Tercentenary of New York (1924). Ludington-Saltus Records (1925). Babcock and Allied Families (1928). The Van Cortlandt Family (1930). Our Colonial and Continental Ancestors ( 1930). Jelke and Frazier and Allied Families (1931). As EDITOR: Year Books of the (N. Y.) Society of Colonial Wars (1914-191S, 1915-1916, 1920-1921). Genealogical Records of the Saint Nicholas Society (1916, 1923). Year Book of the (N. Y.) Society of American Wars (1917). Record Books of the (N. Y.) Society of Mayflower Descendants (1922, 1926). History of the Class of 1912, Yale College, Volume II (1924). The Journals and Papers of Seth Pomeroy (1926). Worthington-Rice and Allied Families (1929). American Colonial Families (1930). Elliott and Gibbons and Allied Families (1931). The Sherrill Genealogy (2nd edition, 1932). Louisbourg Journals, 1745 (1932). BY L. EFFINGHAM DE FOREST AND ANNE LAWRENCE DE FOREST James Cox Brady and his Ancestry (1933). Atterbury and Allied Families ( 1933) . Captain John Underhill (1933). The Descendants of Job Atterbury ( 1933). FOREWORD THIS genealogy was compiled for Mrs.
    [Show full text]