Modelling the Partitioning of Turbulent Fluxes at Urban Sites with Varying Vegetation Cover
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Modelling the partitioning of turbulent fluxes at urban sites with varying vegetation cover Article Published Version Best, M. J. and Grimmond, C. S. B. (2016) Modelling the partitioning of turbulent fluxes at urban sites with varying vegetation cover. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 17 (10). pp. 2537-2553. ISSN 1525-7541 doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM- D-15-0126.1 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/65814/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0126.1 Publisher: American Meteorological Society All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online VOLUME 17 JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY OCTOBER 2016 Modeling the Partitioning of Turbulent Fluxes at Urban Sites with Varying Vegetation Cover M. J. BEST Met Office, Exeter, and Department of Geography, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom C. S. B. GRIMMOND Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom (Manuscript received 17 July 2015, in final form 20 May 2016) ABSTRACT Inclusion of vegetation is critical for urban land surface models (ULSM) to represent reasonably the turbulent sensible and latent heat flux densities in an urban environment. Here the Joint UK Land Environment Simu- lator (JULES), a ULSM, is used to simulate the Bowen ratio at a number of urban and rural sites with vegetation cover varying between 1% and 98%. The results show that JULES is able to represent the observed Bowen ratios, but only when the additional anthropogenic water supplied into the urban ecosystem is considered. The impact of the external water use (e.g., through irrigation or street cleaning) on the surface energy flux partitioning can be as substantial as that of the anthropogenic heat flux on the sensible and latent heat fluxes. The Bowen ratio varies from 1 to 2 when the plan area vegetation fraction is between 30% and 70%. However, when the vegetation fraction is less than 20%, the Bowen ratios increase substantially (2–10) and have greater sensitivity to assumptions about external water use. As there are few long-term observational sites with vegetation cover less than 30%, there is a clear need for more measurement studies in such environments. 1. Introduction and even intersections separate from street canyons (e.g., Kawai et al. 2009). While this may be a good rep- Over the last couple of decades, a number of models resentation of the central downtown areas of major have been developed to represent urban land surface– cities, this design alone (i.e., without a representation of atmosphere interactions, such as the Building Effect vegetation) does not capture the influence of vegetation Parameterization (BEP; Martilli et al. 2002), slab urban present in many street canyons and abundant in the energy balance model (Fortuniak 2003), multilayer ur- suburbs of many cities. ban canopy model (Kondo et al. 2005), Community Vegetation also needs to be modeled for urban Land Model–Urban (CLM-Urban; Oleson et al. 2008), areas. Indeed, the first international urban model and the Seoul National University urban canopy model comparison experiment [Project for Intercomparison (Ryu et al. 2011). Typically, these models are designed of Land-Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS- to represent the energy balance of the various facets that Urban)] concluded that for the two urban sites con- make up an idealized urban canopy. Often this idealized sidered in the study (Vancouver and Melbourne), urban canopy is treated as a symmetric street canyon models that included a representation of vegetation geometry with varying degrees of complexity, ranging performed much better in simulating the sensible Q from a bulk canyon (e.g., Best 2005), separate roof, H and latent heat Q densities than models that neglected walls, and road, with single (e.g., Masson 2000) or mul- E it (Grimmond et al. 2010, 2011; Best and Grimmond tiple (e.g., Krayenhoff and Voogt 2007) energy balances, 2013, 2015). PILPS-Urban also concluded that the way in which the vegetation was modeled, that is, as a sep- Corresponding author address: Martin Best, Met Office, Fitzroy arate independent surface (e.g., Dupont and Mestayer Road, Exeter, Devon EX1 3PB, United Kingdom. 2006) or integrated within the urban street canyon (e.g., E-mail: martin.best@metoffice.gov.uk Lee and Park 2008), was not as important. However, DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0126.1 Ó 2016 American Meteorological Society 2537 2538 JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY VOLUME 17 the main focus of PILPS-Urban results was a suburban For most of the sites the plan area proportions of site (Melbourne, Australia), so it is not clear how robust vegetation and impervious surfaces (streets and build- these conclusions are for other sites with varying fractions ings) combine to account for around 95% of the total of vegetation within the footprint of the observations. area, with the exceptions of Tucson and Ouagadougou. Observational data have quantified directly QH and QE These two sites have substantial areas of bare soil or and hence how the Bowen ratio b (i.e., b 5 QH/QE) varies unmanaged land (17% and 30%, respectively, which is with the vegetation fraction across a range of values modeled as bare soil). However, both these sites are in (Grimmond and Oke 2002; Loridan and Grimmond 2012a). relatively dry climates, and so bare soil evaporation is Here we investigate if an urban model that includes a unlikely to have a substantial contribution to QE, and representation of vegetation can reproduce this ob- hence b. served behavior. Forcing data for urban land surface models typically In this study we use the JULES model (Best et al. includes the downward components of both shortwave 2011). It has been shown to perform well in simulating and longwave radiation; precipitation; surface pressure; QH and QE compared to other models within PILPS- and near-surface atmospheric wind, temperature, and Urban (Best and Grimmond 2016). Here the model is humidity. Details on the observation of each of these used to simulate b for urban areas that range in plan area variables at each of the measurement sites can be found vegetation cover (i.e., two-dimensional vegetation cover in the references provided in Table 1. For many of the as viewed from above) from 1% to 98% that correspond earlier datasets, the radiation components were not to 22 observational dataset footprint descriptions. observed at the sites, but have been taken from nearby stations that make routine measurements or have been derived from empirical formulae. 2. Methods b. Gap-filling for forcing data a. Observational sites As forcing data need to be continuous to undertake For this modeling study, evaluation data come from 22 the simulations, any observational gaps need to be filled. observational tower sites (Table 1) where QH and QE For this study, the processed gap-filled forcing data from were measured by eddy covariance in the inertial sub- Loridan and Grimmond (2012b) are used where avail- layer above usually uniform urban canopies. The mea- able. At sites where these processed data were not surements represent the neighborhood- or local-scale available, further gap-filling of the original observa- surface energy balance. The methods and analysis tech- tional datasets is required. While short periods (a few niques used at each site are described in the papers cor- data values) can be filled using simple interpolation responding to the individual sites (Table 1). The datasets methods, this is not possible for longer periods. Hence, include both short (,2 months) and long (.12 months) an alternative method is required. durations, with the longest (Baltimore) spanning 6 years. For this current study, data from the Water and Most of the shorter datasets were collected in the summer Global Change (WATCH) Forcing Data applied to months. For midlatitudes and semiarid climates, the ERA-Interim (WFDEI; Weedon et al. 2011, 2014) summer months are the periods during which the vege- dataset have been used to fill any missing data gaps in tation is most likely to experience soil moisture stress and the observational dataset. WFDEI spans the period hence limited transpiration. The datasets with observa- from 1979 to 2012 and includes the data required to tions collected during the winter (Ouagadougou and force land surface models. The dataset is global at 0.58 Mexico City) are subtropical climates where the precip- spatial resolution and has been derived using ERA- itation is typically less during the winter months. Hence, Interim (Dee et al. 2011) to downscale monthly obser- these are also the periods that are more likely to have soil vations from the Climatic Research Unit (CRU; New moisture stress on the vegetation. Two rural sites outside et al. 1999, 2000; Harris et al. 2014) to a temporal reso- of Basel (R1 and R2) were added to complete the spec- lution of 3 h [see Weedon et al. (2011, 2014) for more trum of vegetation cover fractions modeled. details]. For precipitation, WFDEI has an alternative The surface characteristics affecting the measure- that is derived from the Global Precipitation Climatol- ments have a range from almost full vegetation cover to ogy Centre (GPCC; Schneider et al. 2014) for the only 1% (Table 2). The surface cover data used in this monthly observations rather than CRU. In this study, study are from the literature. For the few sites with only the WFDEI dataset based on GPCC precipitation the total vegetation amount reported, additional ana- is used.