Palm Avenue Revitalization Plan Technical Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Palm Avenue Revitalization Plan Technical Report Palm Avenue Revitalization Plan Technical Report Final Report | March 2016 Palm Avenue Revitalization Plan Final Technical Report Prepared for: Prepared by: 3900 5th Avenue, Suite 210 San Diego, California 92101 In association with: March 2016 Acknowledgements The Palm Avenue Revitalization Plan was funded by a Caltrans Transpiration Planning Grant for Environmental Justice. This plan greatly benefitted from the participation of the Otay Mesa‐ Nestor Community Planning Group as well as local residents and business owners who provided valuable feedback throughout the plan development. City of San Diego Planning Department Jeff Murphy, Director Tom Tomlinson, Assistant Director Nancy Bragado, Deputy Director Nancy Graham, Project Manager Tanner French, Mobility Planner Brian Schoenfisch, Principal Planner Samir Hajjiri, Senior Traffic Engineer Michael Prinz, Senior Planner Jenny An, Former Associate Planner Page i Palm Avenue Revitalization Plan Final Technical Report Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 11 1.1 Background & Purpose .................................................................................................................. 11 1.2 Report Organization ....................................................................................................................... 11 1.3 Project Location and Planning Area ............................................................................................... 12 1.4 Population Characteristics ............................................................................................................. 15 1.5 Relevant Planning Documents and Policies ................................................................................... 16 2.0 Corridor Environment ............................................................................................................... 21 2.1 Existing and Planned Land Uses ..................................................................................................... 21 2.2 Urban Design .................................................................................................................................. 25 2.3 Community Health ......................................................................................................................... 29 3.0 Mobility Analysis Methodology ................................................................................................ 31 3.1 Pedestrian ...................................................................................................................................... 31 3.2 Bicycle ............................................................................................................................................ 32 3.3 Transit ............................................................................................................................................ 35 3.4 Vehicular ........................................................................................................................................ 35 4.0 Current Conditions Mobility Analysis ........................................................................................ 42 4.1 Walkability ..................................................................................................................................... 43 4.1.1 Pedestrian Facilities............................................................................................................... 44 4.1.2 Pedestrian Demand ............................................................................................................... 44 4.1.3 Pedestrian Safety .................................................................................................................. 46 4.1.4 Pedestrian Environment Evaluation ...................................................................................... 52 4.2 Cycling ............................................................................................................................................ 56 4.2.1 Bicycle Facilities ..................................................................................................................... 57 4.2.2 Bicycle Demand ..................................................................................................................... 60 4.2.3 Bicycle Safety ......................................................................................................................... 60 4.2.4 Bicycle Level of Stress............................................................................................................ 66 4.3 Transit System ................................................................................................................................ 68 4.3.1 Bus & Trolley Systems ........................................................................................................... 70 4.3.2 Transit Demand ..................................................................................................................... 70 4.3.3 Transit User Safety ................................................................................................................ 71 4.4 Vehicular Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 74 4.4.1 Roadway Geometry ............................................................................................................... 74 4.4.2 Roadway Level of Service ...................................................................................................... 76 4.4.3 Intersection Geometrics and Traffic Volumes ...................................................................... 79 4.4.4 Intersection Level of Service ................................................................................................. 79 4.4.5 Arterial Speed Analysis .......................................................................................................... 83 4.4.6 VISSIM Micro‐Simulation and Intersection Queuing Analysis .............................................. 83 4.4.7 Freeway Segment Level of Service ........................................................................................ 84 4.4.8 Vehicular Safety .................................................................................................................... 85 5.0 Model Forecasting .................................................................................................................... 90 5.1 Series 12 Model 2035 Traffic Volume Forecast ............................................................................. 90 5.2 Naval Base Coronado Coastal Campus Expansion Considerations ................................................ 90 5.3 Series 12 Model 2035 Traffic Volume Forecast with Added Naval Traffic .................................... 91 Page ii Palm Avenue Revitalization Plan Final Technical Report 6.0 Preferred Concept Plan ............................................................................................................. 94 6.1 Identification of the Preferred Plan – Community Workshop #2 .................................................. 94 6.2 Preferred Concept Plan .................................................................................................................. 97 6.3 Urban Design Framework & Operational Improvements .............................................................. 99 7.0 Preferred Plan Mobility Analysis ............................................................................................. 100 7.1 Walkability ................................................................................................................................... 100 7.2 Bicycling ....................................................................................................................................... 104 7.3 Transit System .............................................................................................................................. 106 7.4 Vehicular Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 107 7.4.1 Roadway Level of Service .................................................................................................... 107 7.4.2 Intersection Geometry ........................................................................................................ 109 7.4.3 Intersection Level of Service Analysis ................................................................................. 109 7.4.4 Intersection Control Evaluation .......................................................................................... 114 7.4.5 VISSIM Micro‐Simulation and Intersection Queuing Analysis ............................................ 114 7.4.6 Freeway Segment Level of Service Analysis ........................................................................ 115 7.4.7 Parking ................................................................................................................................. 115 8.0 Implementation Strategy ........................................................................................................ 120 8.1 Near‐Term and Long‐Term Projects
Recommended publications
  • The Housing Affordability Crisis
    Addressing The Housing Affordability Crisis San Diego Housing Production Objectives 2018-2028 We’re About People “Increase the number of housing opportunities that serve low-income and homeless individuals and families in the City of San Diego” Strategic Plan Goal San Diego Housing Commission September 9, 2016 Message from the President & CEO September 21, 2017 Identifying solutions to the housing affordability crisis in the City of San Diego requires innovation, collaboration, and the will to take action. I commend and thank our City, County, State and Federal elected officials, as well as the San Diego Housing Commission (SDHC) Board of Commissioners, for demonstrating their commitment to all three. When SDHC released our landmark report, “Addressing the Housing Affordability Crisis: An Action Plan for San Diego,” on November 25, 2015, we identified 11 recommended actions at the Local, State and Federal levels to reduce housing development costs and to increase production. To date, action has been taken on nine of these 11 recommendations, including the first—to set annual goals for housing production. To facilitate the creation of these goals for the City of San Diego, SDHC, in collaboration with San Diego City Councilmembers Scott Sherman and David Alvarez, the Chair and Vice Chair, respectively, of the City Council’s Smart Growth and Land Use Committee, studied the City’s overall housing production needs, its current supply, as well as its capacity for additional homes. Although the City of San Diego’s housing needs are even higher than previously estimated, the good news is that the City has enough capacity to create sufficient housing to meet our 10-year needs, as identified in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Communities of Midway/Pacific Highway Corridor and Old Town Mobility Existing Conditions Report (September 2012) Appendix D: Transit Boarding Worksheets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
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Oriented Communities in the San Diego Region
    San Diego Association of Governments TRANSIT ORIENTED COMMUNITIES IN THE SAN DIEGO REGION DRAFT - CONTEXT REPORT November 2014 DRAFT TRANSIT ORIENTED COMMUNITIES IN EconomicTHE Context SAN Report DIEGO REGION San Diego Regional TOD Strategy DRAFT - CONTEXT REPORT November 2014October 15, 2014 PREPARED FOR: San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) prepared for: PREPARED BY: SANDAG AECOM REGIONAL TOD STRATEGY Fashion Valley Transit Center in the 1980s. Flickr / SDMTS: https://www.flickr.com/photos/sdmts/13441171155/ TRANSIT-ORIENTED COMMUNITIES IN THE SAN DIEGO REGION: CONTEXT REPORT III SANDAG TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Context of Transit-Oriented Communities in the San Diego Region ........................ 1 2 Setting a Foundation for the Future of Transit-Oriented Communities .................... 5 3 Population, Employment, and Housing Growth in the San Diego Region ������������� 13 4 Regional Transit System and Access to Employment ............................................. 27 5 Local Market Readiness and Development Prototypes .......................................... 47 6 Types of Transit-Oriented Communities ................................................................. 59 7 Trends and Considerations ................................................................................... 67 8 Building a Toolbox ................................................................................................ 73 9 Example TOD Projects in the San Diego Region .................................................... 75 APPENDICES A Description
    [Show full text]
  • UC SAN DIEGO BLUE LINE Cable Car Time Schedule & Line Route
    UC SAN DIEGO BLUE LINE cable car time schedule & line map San Ysidro - America Plaza View In Website Mode The UC SAN DIEGO BLUE LINE cable car line (San Ysidro - America Plaza) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) America Plaza: 12:28 AM - 11:58 PM (2) San Ysidro: 4:18 AM - 11:48 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest UC SAN DIEGO BLUE LINE cable car station near you and ƒnd out when is the next UC SAN DIEGO BLUE LINE cable car arriving. Direction: America Plaza UC SAN DIEGO BLUE LINE cable car Time Schedule 18 stops America Plaza Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 12:28 AM - 11:58 PM Monday 12:28 AM - 11:58 PM San Ysidro Station 723 E San Ysidro Bl, San Diego Tuesday 12:28 AM - 11:58 PM Beyer Blvd Station Wednesday 12:28 AM - 11:58 PM 165 West Seaward Avenue, San Diego Thursday 12:28 AM - 11:58 PM Iris Avenue Station Friday 12:28 AM - 11:58 PM 3098 Iris Avenue, San Diego Saturday 12:28 AM - 11:58 PM Palm Avenue Station Palomar Street Station H Street Station UC SAN DIEGO BLUE LINE cable car Info Direction: America Plaza E Street Station Stops: 18 Trip Duration: 45 min 24th Street Station Line Summary: San Ysidro Station, Beyer Blvd Station, Iris Avenue Station, Palm Avenue Station, 8th Street Station Palomar Street Station, H Street Station, E Street Station, 24th Street Station, 8th Street Station, Paciƒc Fleet Station Paciƒc Fleet Station, Harborside Station, Barrio Logan Station, 12th & Imperial Station, Park & Market Station, City College Station, Fifth Avenue Harborside Station Station, Civic
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Document
    2006 ON-SITE SAFETY AUDIT OF SAN DIEGO TROLLEY, INC. (SDTI) RAIL TRANSIT SAFETY SECTION RAIL TRANSIT AND CROSSING SAFETY BRANCH CONSUMER PROTECTION AND SAFETY DIVISION CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 September 20, 2006 FINAL REPORT Richard W. Clark, Director Consumer Protection and Safety Division 2006 ON-SITE SAFETY AUDIT OF SAN DIEGO TROLLEY, INC. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The California Public Utilities Commission’s Rail Transit Safety Section and Railroad Operations & Safety Section staff conducted this system safety program audit. Staff members directly responsible for conducting audit and inspection activities include: Joey Bigornia Don Miller Eddie Damron Gerald Muffley Raed Dwairi Mahendra Patel Sue Feyl Gary Rosenthal Anton Garabetian Brian Yu Claudia Lam TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................2 2. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................4 3. BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................5 A. SDTI Rail System Description ............................................................................................5 B. SDTI 2003 Triennial Audit Recommendations Status ........................................................6 4. AUDIT PROCEDURE ..............................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Potential Joint Development Properties
    INVENTORY OF POTENTIAL JOINT DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES 1 Policy and Procedure No. 18 – Joint Use and Development of Property . The policy addresses the Board’s intention to maximize the potential of its real estate assets consistent with transportation goals and community development objectives. The policy contains goals, criteria, and process format to consider joint use and development. The policy requires a current inventory of properties suitable for joint use or development to be presented to the Board annually. 2 Previous and Active MTS Joint Use and Development Projects • Creekside Villas at the 47th Street Trolley Station in San Diego - Affordable housing and day care. • Sweetwater Union High School District Adult Education Extension at the 24th Street Trolley Station. • Morena Vista Transit Oriented Development in San Diego • Grossmont Trolley Station Transit Oriented Development in La Mesa 3 Inventory – Attachment A 4 Highlighted Properties • Bayfront / E Street Station • H Street Station • Palm Avenue Station • Massachusetts Avenue Station • El Cajon Transit Center • Grantville Station • Baltimore Junction •12th and Imperial 5 Bayfront / E Street Station 6 Bayfront / E Street Station • City of Chula Vista • 4.15 Acres • 295 Total Parking Spaces • 4 Bus Bays • Site Notes: • Urban Core Specific Plan • Chula Vista Gateway • Adjacent development on City property • Previous ENA and associated studies 7 H Street Station 8 H Street Station • City of Chula Vista • 3.13 acres • 286 Total Parking Spaces • 8 Bus Bays • Site Notes: • Hazardous
    [Show full text]
  • Trends Before the San Diego Trolley
    Trends Before the ILS. Department of Transportatjon San Diego Trolley A San Diego Trolley Guideway July 1982 Implementation Monitoring Study Report Trends Before the San Diego Trolley A San Diego Trolley Guideway Implementation Monitoring Study Report Interim Report July 1982 Prepared by San Diego Association of Governments Suite 524, Security Pacific Plaza 1200 Tliird Avenue San Diego, California Prepared for Office of Planning Assistance Urban Mass Transportation Adnninistration Washington, D.C. 20590 In cooperation with Technology Sharing Program Office of the Secretary of Transportation DOT-l-82-40 Board of Directors SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) is a voluntary public agency formed by local governments to assure overall areawide planning and coordination for the San Diego region. Voting members include the Incorporated Cities of Carisbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, and Vista. Advisory Members include CALTRANS and Tijuana/Baja California Norte. CHAIRWOMAN: Harriet Stockwell VICE CHAIRMAN: Jess Van Deventer SECRETARY-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Richard J. Huff CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Jess E. Van Deventer, Vice Mayor (A) J. Louis (pamacho. Councilman CITY OF CARLSBAD Mary Casler, Mayor CITY OF OCEANSIDE Lawrence M. Bagley, Mayor CITY OF CHULA VISTA (A) Melba Bishop, Deputy Mayor Greg Cox, Mayor (A) Frank Scott, Councilman CITY OF POWAY Robert Emery, Councilman CITY OF CORONADO (A) Carl Kruse, Councilman Lois Ewen, Councilwoman (A) Robert G. Odiorne, Mayor Pro Tem CITY OF SAN DIEGO Susan Golding, Councilwoman CITY OF DEL MAR (A) Ed Struiksma, Councilman Lou Terrell, Councilman (A) Arlene Carsten, Councilwoman CITY OF SAN MARCOS Lionel G.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Impact of Light Rail Transit on Real Estate Values
    ANAL3~SIS OF T.YE Ih~fPACi OF LIG~iT RAID..'I'I~i~TI ON REAL FSTAT~ V~L'~JLS for the Alecropolitan Transit Development Board by '~TlI Rainhnw Appraisal Sersice ~+ - ---~ : Rain~~~ . ~ :, s ~ ~ '~~_~=~_~ A~~rt~95~1~ S~~1C^ HE 1 ~+ $ .V64 A52 r 1 992 c.2 R', I~ITDB 9 Metropolitan Transit Development Board ~` '~ n"~ ~'~ at ~~~r 1255 Imperial Avenue, Suite 1000 San Diego, CA 92101-7490 (619) 231-1466 Agenda Item No.~ FAX (619) 2343407 Board of Directors Meeting T 593 July 23, 1992 V Subject: LRT IMPACT ON REAL ESTATE VALUES INTRODUCTION: MTDB has received numerous requests for information on the impacts of light rail transit (LRT) on land values. These inquiries have originated with both investors interested in developing properties near transit facilities and people concerned about the impact of LRT extensions to their businesses or properties. The study findings presented herein provide a quantitative basis to respond to such inquiries. This study investigated whether the San Diego Trolley induced any changes in real estate values to properties near the LRT system. Properties near the LRT system were compared with similarly developed properties beyond the influence of LRT. Properties were categorized by land use and proximity to LRT. Single and multi- family residential, office, retail, hotel/motel, and industrial land uses were analyzed. An additional objective of this study was to analyze the land uses along the C Street corridor in downtown San Diego to determine if LRT stimulates some land uses at the expense of others. RECOMMENDATION: That the MTD Board of Directors accept for information purposes the attached study on the impact of LRT on property values.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Committee Agenda
    Members Joe Kellejian, Chair Councilmember, Solana Beach (Representing North County Coastal) Jim Madaffer, Vice Chair Councilmember, City of San Diego Lori Holt Pfeiler Mayor, Escondido (Representing North County Inland) Jack Dale Councilmember, Santee TRANSPORTATION (Representing East County) Phil Monroe COMMITTEE Councilmember, Coronado (Representing South County) AGENDA Bill Horn Chairman, County of San Diego Bob Emery Metropolitan Transit System Friday, February 17, 2006 Jerome Stocks Chairman, North County Transit District 9 a.m. to 12 noon Mary Teresa Sessom SANDAG Board Room San Diego County Regional th Airport Authority 401 B Street, 7 Floor San Diego Alternates David Druker Councilmember, Del Mar (Representing North County Coastal) Toni Atkins AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS Councilmember, City of San Diego Jerry Sanders Mayor, City of San Diego • MTS COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONAL Bob Campbell ANALYSIS Councilmember, Vista (Representing North County Inland) • I-5 NORTH COAST MANAGED LANES VALUE Art Madrid Mayor, La Mesa PRICING STUDY (Representing East County) Jerry Rindone • 2030 REVENUE CONSTRAINED RTP: 2006 Councilmember, Chula Vista (Representing South County) UPDATE Ron Roberts Vice Chairman, County of San Diego • COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION SERVICES Greg Cox AGENCY Chairman Pro Tem, County of San Diego Harry Mathis Chairman, Metropolitan Transit System Jerome Stocks PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES DURING THE MEETING Chairman, North County Transit District Ed Gallo, Vice Chairman North County Transit District YOU CAN LISTEN TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Xema Jacobsen MEETING BY VISITING OUR WEB SITE AT WWW.SANDAG.ORG San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Advisory Members MISSION STATEMENT Pedro Orso-Delgado The 18 cities and county government are SANDAG serving as the forum for regional decision- District 11 Director, Caltrans making.
    [Show full text]
  • First and Last Mile Solutions for Transit Centers
    SANDAG First and Last Mile Solutions for Transit Centers Project Report October 2011 Prepared for: San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) Prepared by: SANDAG First and Last Mile Solutions for Transit Centers Project Report Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 STUDY APPROACH .................................................................................................................................. 2 3 STATION SELECTION ............................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 CANDIDATE STATIONS AND STATION SELECTION APPROACH ............................................................................... 3 3.2 INITIAL STATION SCREENING ......................................................................................................................... 5 3.3 NARROWED SET OF STATIONS EVALUATION .................................................................................................. 10 3.4 STATION SELECTION RESULTS ..................................................................................................................... 11 3.5 SELECTED STATIONS – SITE VISITS ............................................................................................................... 16 4 SOLUTION OPTIONS .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Circulate San Diego Sees Better Use of MTS Land
    Friday, April 27, 2018 Circulate San Diego sees better use of MTS land By Thor Kamban Biberman As policy makers digest Circulate San Diego's report on redeveloping underutilized Metropolitan Transit System land, just how many housing units will actually be built on each of these properties remains uncertain. Circulate San Diego, a nonprofit advocate of public transportation and sustainable growth, concluded that as many as 8,800 residential units could be developed around transit sites throughout the county. The grassroots organization said while MTS has dedicated vast amounts of land to parking -- about 57 acres -- only a fraction of it is being used. "Some of that parking may be appropriate given the current levels of demand," the report stated. "However, much of that parking is demonstrably not used. MTS has a substantial opportunity to leverage underutilized real estate for public benefit." Circulate San Diego executive director Colin Parent said the biggest opportunity for redevelopment of an MTS site is the 9.4-acre Grantville Trolley Station. "That parking lot (which has 246 parking spaces) is two-thirds empty," he said. Parent, who wrote the Circulate report, said as many as 1,500 residential units could be developed at the Grantville location. While the report said the property currently allows for 109 units per acre -- which would only enable 1,024 units to be build -- Parent said a 50 percent density bonus for the provision of affordable housing brings the figure to more than 1,500 units. Parent said another 1,150 units or so could be developed at the El Cajon Transit Center, which has 481 parking spaces, along with bus bays.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit-Oriented Development: an Examination of America’S Transit Precincts in 2000 & 2010
    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO UNOTI Publications UNO Transportation Institute 6-2013 Transit-Oriented Development: An Examination of America’s Transit Precincts in 2000 & 2010 John L. Renne Merritt C. Becker, Jr. University of New Orleans Transportation Institute, [email protected] Reid Ewing University of Utah Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/unoti_pubs Part of the Transportation Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Renne, John L. and Ewing, Reid, "Transit-Oriented Development: An Examination of America’s Transit Precincts in 2000 & 2010" (2013). UNOTI Publications. Paper 17. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/unoti_pubs/17 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the UNO Transportation Institute at ScholarWorks@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in UNOTI Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gulf Coast Research Center for Evacuation and Transportation Resiliency LSU / UNO University Transportation Center Transit-Oriented Development: An Examination of America’s Transit Precincts in 2000 & 2010 Final Report John L. Renne, Ph.D., AICP University of New Orleans with Reid Ewing, Ph.D. University of Utah Sponsoring Agency United States Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration Washington, DC Project # 12-06 June 2013 GULF COAST RESEARCH CENTER FOR EVACUATION AND TRANSPORTATION RESILIENCY The Gulf Coast Research Center for Evacuation and Transportation Resiliency is a collaborative effort between the Louisiana State University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and the University of New Orleans' Department of Planning and Urban Studies. The theme of the LSU-UNO Center is focused on Evacuation and Transportation Resiliency in an effort to address the multitude of issues that impact transportation processes under emergency conditions such as evacuation and other types of major events.
    [Show full text]