DOCSLIB.ORG

Contents (Click on Index Item to Locate)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Contents (Click on Index Item to Locate) Contents (Click on index item to locate) Subject Page Foreword iii Introductory note vii Statement of information 1 Statement of Information and Supporting Evidentiary Material 19 STATEMENT OF INFORMATION SUBMITTED ON BEHALF OF PRESIDENT NIXON HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NINETY-THIRD CONGRESS SECOND SESSION PURSUANT TO H. Res. 803 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY TO INVESTIGATE WHETHER SUFFICIENT GROUNDS EXIST FOR THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO EXERCISE ITS CONSTITUTIONAL POWER TO IMPEACH RICHARD M. NIXON PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BOOK II DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE-ITT LITIGATION MAY-JUNE 1974 3'6-l03 o U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE W^ WASHINGTON 1 1974 For sale by the Superintendent of l)oculllellts, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $2.35 COUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT JAMES D. ST. CLAIR, Special Counsel to the President JOHN A, MCCAHILL, Assistant Special Counsel MALCOLM J. HOWARD, Assistant Special Counsel (II) FOREWOR D _ . By Hon. Peter W. Rodino, Jr., Chairman Committee on the Judiciary On February 6, 1974, the House of Representatives adopted by a vote of 410-4 the following House Resolution 803: RESOLVED, That the Committee on the Judiciary acting as a whole or by any subcommittee thereof appointed by the Chairman for-the purposes hereof and in accordance with the Rules of the Committee, is authorized and directed to investigate fully and completely whether sufficient grounds exist for the House of Representatives to exercise its constitutional power to impeach Richard M. Nixon, President of the United States of America. The committee shall report to the House of Representatives such resolutions, articles of impeachment, or other recommendations as it deems proper. On May 9, 1974, as Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary, I convened the Committee for hearings to review the results of the Impeachment Inquiry staff's investigation. The hearings were convened pursuant to the Committee's Impeachment Inquiry Procedures adopted on May 2, 1974. (III) These Procedures provided that President Nixon should be afforded the opportunity to have his counsel present throughout the hearings and to receive a copy of the statement of information and related documents and other evidentiary material at the time that those materials are furnished to the members. Mr. James D. St. Clair, Special Counsel to the President, was present throughout the initial presentation by the Impeachment Inquiry staff. Following the completion of the initial presentation, the Committee resolved, in accordance with its Procedures, to invite the President's counsel to respond in writing to the Committee's initial evidentiary presentation. The Committee decided that the President's response should be in the manner of the Inquiry staff's initial presentation before the Committee, in accordance with Rule A of the Committee's Impeachment Inquiry Procedures, and should consist of information and evidentiary material, other than the testimony of witnesses, believed by the President's counsel to be pertinent to the inquiry. Counsel for the President was likewise afforded the opportunity to supplement its written response with an oral presentation to the Committee. (IV) President Nixon's response was presented to the Committee on June 27 and June 28. One notebook was furnished to the members of the Committee relating to the Department of Justice - ITT litigation. In this notebook a statement of information relating to a particular phase of the investigation was immediately followed by supporting evidentiary material which included copies of documents and testimony (much already on the public record) and transcripts of Presidential conversation s. The Committee on the Judiciary is working to follow faithfully its mandate to investigate fully and completely "whether or not sufficient grounds exist" to recommend that the House exercise its constitutional power of impeachment. Consistent with this mandate, the Committee voted to make public the President's response in the same form and manner as the Inquiry staff's initial presentation. July, 1974 (v) INTRODU( :T0R,Y NOTE The material contained in this volume is presented in two sections. Section 1 contains a statement of information footnoted with citations to evidentiary material. Section 2 contains the same statement of information followed by the supporting material. Each page of supporting evidence is labeled with the footnote number and a description of the document or the name of the witness testifying. Copies of entire pages of documents and testimony are included, with brackets around the portions pertaining to the statement of information. In the citation of sources, "SSC" has been used as an abbreviation for the Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities. (IX) STATEMENT OF INFORMATION SUBMITTED ON BEHALF OF THE PRESIDENT DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE -- ITT LITIGATION (1) 1. In December, 1968, Richard W. McLaren was interviewed . s for the position of Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, Department of Justice, by John N. Mitchell and Richard G. Kleindienst. As a condition to his acceptance of that position, Mr. McLaren . insisted that antitrust enforcement decisions would be based solely on the merits of any given situation. v _ - Page la Richard W. McLaren testimony, 2 KCH 116-117 . 22 lb Richard G. Kleindienst testimony,.............3 KCH 1725.................24 (3) 2, In 1968, Mr. Nixon appointed a Task Force on Productivity and Competition to review antitrust policy and make recommendations. The task force, headed by Professor George Stigler of the University of Chicago, presented its report to President Nixon on February 18, 1969 and recommended against immediate legal action re: conglomerate me rge rs . 2a _ Stigler Report, 115 Cong. Rec. 15653, 15656 (1969). 26 2b White House "White Paper, " The ITT Anti-Trust Decision, January 8, 1974, 2. 5 2c Remarks of Harold S. Geneen, ITT Chairman and President June 26, 1969, Annual Meeting of ITT Shareholders, 8 •- - 33 (4) 3. Apparently, ill June of 1969, Mr. Geneen sought to meet with President Nix:on about certain financial and economic concerns of ITT, including, but not limited to, the antitrust ~~.|t~~'.~,. John BUT. D Mitchell, for one, thought the meeting would be ina.- ppropriate because of ITT's legal involvement with the Department of Justice. The meeting was not schedule. 3a Letter of June 9, 1969, fro,n LOI.^~~ A{. Berry to the President enclosing one co,), of a June 3, Page 1969, letter from Geneen to Maurice Stans..............................................36 3b Memorandum of July 14, 1969, from John .Mitchell to John Ehrlichman,-.-.-..............................................................43 3c Memorandum of July 16, 1969, from Dwight L. ~~ . ~~ . (5) 4. In March, 1971, the Solicitor General authorized an appeal to the Supreme Court from an adverse decision in the United States v. ITT (~rinnell) case because of practical difficulties in the future if the decision were left standing. The Solicitor General and his associates thought the case to be very hard; his chief deputy thought the government's chances of winning were minimal. Page 4a Memorandum from A. Raymond Randolph, Jr. to the Solicitor General dated March 2, 1971 46 4b Memorandum from Daniel M. Friedman to the Solicitor General,................................................... dated March 15, 1971; 1, 4-5- 4c Supplemental memorandum from A Raymond Randolph Jr. to Daniel M. Friedman, dated March 25, 1971; 1, 2, . 60 4d Memorandum to the Solicitor General from Daniel M. Friedman dated March 26, 1971 62 4c March 26, 1971, appeal authorization of the Solicitor .Ge!nP ral ........................- - - - - .....................................................63 (6) 5. - After the President's telephone call of April 19, 1971, to Kleindienst ordering him to drop the Grinnell appeal, Kleindienst met, in his office, with McLaren and the Solicitor General and requested the Solicitor General to apply for an extension. McLaren had no objection to the application for an additional extension of time. Page 5a Ervin N. Griswold testimony, 2 KCH 380, 388,..................................................66 5b Richard W. McLaren testimony, 2 KCH 327, 3288-............................................68 5c Richard G. Kleindienst testimony, 2 KCH 289, 292, 3 KCH 1680. 70 41-566 O - 74 - 2 (7) 6. On June 17, 1971, McLaren recommended to Kleindienst that the ITT suits be settled. K1eindienst approved the proposed settlement by writing: "Approved, G/17/71. RGK. " In affixing his approval, Kleindienst relied on the expertise of McLaren. Page 6a Testimony of Richard W. McLaren 2 KCH 110-113,,, ,,, 74 6b Testimony of Richard CG, K1eindienst 3 KCH 1732-1733,, 78 (8) 7. Settlement initiations had taken place in late 1970. ITT's settlement posture advanced included its keeping the Hartford Fire Insurance Company. McLaren rejected any settlement talk along that line. In early 1971, ITT began to formulate a plan, based on economic theory, of why it was important for ITT to retain Hartford. Eventually, on April 29, 1971, ITT made an economic presentation to the Department of Justice on national economic consequences if ITT were forced to divest itself of Hartford. As a result of that presentation, in combination with the Ransdem Report from his own independent financial expert, McLaren proposed a settlement offer enabling ITT to retain Hartford. 7a Memorandum of John
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Panama Treaty 10 11 12 77 2
    Collection: Office of the Chief of Staff Files Series: Hamilton Jordan's Confidential Files Folder: Panama Canal Treaty 10,11,12/77 [2] Container: 36 Folder Citation: Office of the Chief of Staff Files, Hamilton Jordan's Confidential Files, Panama Canal Treaty 10,11,12/77 [2], Container 36 PANAMA CANAL TREATIES PRELIMINARY SENATE VOTE COUNT DEMOCRATS REPUBLICANS + + Church Case Cranston Chafee Culver Danforth Glenn Griffin Gravel Hatfield Hart Javits Hollings Mathias Humphrey Packwood Inouye Pear:son Jackson Percy Kennedy Weicker 11 Matsunaga McGovern Morgan Moynihan Muskie Ribicoff Riegle Sarbanes Sparkman Williams Pell Clark Abourezk 24 +1 Bayh Byrd Durkin Eagleton Magnuson Melcher Metzenbaum Stevenson 8 1 1 Swing list including those up for re-election Anderson Metcalf Baker Bentsen McIntyre Bellmon Biden Nelson Brooke (Because of potential election Bumpers Nunn problems) Chiles Proxmire Goldw2ter DeConcini Randolph Hayakawa Ford Sasser - ;I (1 Heinz Haskell Stone Lugar Hathaway Schweiker Huddleston Stafford Leahy Stevens -2­ DEMOCRATS REPUBLICANS - (Opposed) - (Opposed) Allen Bartlett Cannon Curtis Burdick Dole Eastland Domenici Johnston Garn Long Hansen McClellan Hatch' Stennis Helms Talmadge Laxalt Zorinsky McClure Roth Schmitt Scott Thurmond Tower Wallop Young INDEPENDENTS - (Opposed) Harry Byrd PAN~~A CANAL TREATIES Senators u9 for re-election. Democrats -- Supporting Sparkman Clark Pell Democrats who would normally support but have election ~roblems in addition to the Panama Canal Treaties issue. HcIntyre Haskell Anderson Democrats who should support the Treaties I but \-,Tho could have election problems because of the issue. Biden Huddleston Hathaway f..letcalf Randolph Democrats who would normally lean in favor of the Treaties.• Nunn Proxmire Democrats opposed McClellan Johnston : Eastland Democrats announcing they will not run and should have their vote.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Smart Power in U.S.-Spain Relations, 1969-1986
    THE ROLE OF SMART POWER IN U.S.-SPAIN RELATIONS, 1969-1986 By DAVID A. JUSTICE Bachelor of Arts in History Athens State University Athens, Alabama 2012 Master of Arts in History University of North Alabama Florence, Alabama 2014 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 2020 THE ROLE OF SMART POWER IN U.S.-SPAIN RELATIONS, 1969-1986 Dissertation Approved: Dr. Laura Belmonte Dissertation Adviser Dr. Douglas Miller Dr. Matthew Schauer Dr. Isabel Álvarez-Sancho ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation, this labor of love, would not be complete if it were not for a number of people. First, I would like to thank my dissertation committee of brilliant scholars. My advisor Laura Belmonte was integral in shaping this work and myself as an academic. Since my arrival at Oklahoma State, Dr. B has crafted me into the scholar that I am now. Her tireless encouragement, editing of multiple drafts, and support of this ever evolving project will always be appreciated. She also provided me with numerous laughs from the presidential pups, Willy and James. Doug Miller has championed my work since we began working together, and his candor and unconditional support was vital to finishing. Also, our discussions of Major League Baseball were much needed during coursework. Matt Schauer’s mentorship was integral to my time at Oklahoma State. The continuous laughter and support during meetings, along with discussions of classic films, were vital to my time at Oklahoma State.
    [Show full text]
  • 007 Staff Assistant and OTP Work
    Monday, March 24, 40 Women in The News portfolio , ZSVM,14,,, -•\ .\, \WA sX,.V.s1•K,"g ,..,N. He Uses the Yellow Pages Need Help? Cali Your Congressman F WALLY, his administrative assistant INFORMATIONWISE, it hasn't been a Gerald Devlin called Maritime and asked great month for Mr. Devlin or Rep. Daniels By to speak to the administrator. in their dealings with government agencies. "I'm sorry, sir, he doesn't get sworn in Earlier a Jersey City veterans' leader, until tomorrow." who is working on a project for amputee Clare "Well, surely," said Mr. DeVlin now veterans in military hospitals, called to more concerned than ever,"somebody is in find out the average stay of an amputee in Crawford charge of the Maritime Administration to- a military hospital. day?" A Daniels staff member called Army "I'm not sure, sir," was the reply, "but I Liaison. can let you speak to the administrator's Army Liaison referred the question to YOU can call your congressman when secretary." extension 66146 at the Pantagon. you get the runaround from a government Mr. Devlin never did discover whether 66146 said call 62787. agency, but what can your congressman do she was the secretary to the outgoing or 62787 said call Major Mallory at 61737. when he gets the runaround? incoming administrator, but he described at Look in the yellow pages. his problem and she promised to "do what Major Mallory said call Mr. Perkins Last week, Rep. Dominick Daniels heard she could." 63650. there had been an explosion on the S.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kennedy-Nixon Debates: Television Comes to Politics BOOK EXCERPT States to Address Educational Needs
    BOOK EXCERPT PASSAGES The Kennedy-Nixon debates: television comes to politics Conrad Black In this excerpt from The Invincible Quest: The Life of Richard Milhous Nixon, Conrad Black weaves a narrative of the Kennedy-Nixon debates, the seminal event of the 1960 presidential campaign, which vaulted modern politics into the television age. Who won? Kennedy on appearance on television, Nixon on substance on radio. Though Nixon lost, barely, he would be back eight years later and finally won the White House. Dans cet extrait de The Invincible Quest: The Life of Richard Milhous Nixon, Conrad Black retrace les faits entourant les débats Kennedy-Nixon, événements décisifs de la campagne présidentielle de 1960 qui aura marqué le passage de la vie politique moderne à l’âge télévisuel. Le vainqueur ? Kennedy au petit écran pour l’image, Nixon à la radio pour la substance. Ce dernier allait rater de justesse la Maison-Blanche avant d’y faire son entrée huit ans plus tard. he first presidential debate was Kennedy found it so refreshing, he that the Eisenhower years had shown a in Chicago on September 26. insisted on the same preparatory therapy good deal more progress than had the T Nixon prepared the day before for all the debates. As is notorious, Truman years. The fifties were not and flew to Chicago, touring the wards Kennedy won the battle of appearances. slow-motion times, he pointed out, in a motorcade when he arrived and He wore a dark suit, was tanned and con- but in fact the greatest years of speaking to the Carpenters’ Union in fident, while Nixon seemed haggard and progress and generally improving liv- the morning.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Bureau of Standards Becomes the National
    CHAPTER TWO BRIGHT PROSPECTS FOR NBS (August 1969—May 1972) It was a terrible year for America, 1968, but one of great expectations for the National Bureau of Standards. The paradoxical existence of an optimistic attitude among the staff of NBS—arising in the midst of a mordant pessimism for the future of their country among the American public—had its resolution in the anticipation of vigorous new leadership for the Bureau. True, the NBS budget was confining; it was necessary for many a manager to seek fundingfrom sources outside of Congress in order to reach for new programs or, sometimes, to support existing ones. Also true, the state of the scientific equipment was precarious in many a Bureau laboratory. But the staff was strong, the laboratories themselves were modern, and the reputation of NBS for integrity and scientific capability was secure. Allen Astin had left a fine legacy. The Bureau staff could not anticipate all the changes that were in store for their agency, although the signs were there to be seen. Public support of the scientific establishment was declining; the decrease was felt most keenly among those involved in fundamental studies. In response to that decline, there was a rising insistence on "relevance," the ability tO justify projects in terms of immediate public benefits. Continually growing was the number of large programs created to address the troubles of a beleaguered American industry. The one change that was obvious was that Allen Astin was stepping down from his post of 17 years. The prospect that a vigorous new leader could magnify the gains achieved under Astin was exciting.
    [Show full text]
  • President Richard Nixon's Daily Diary May 1. 1969 The
    THE WHITE HOUSE PRESIDENT RICHARD NIXON'S DAILY DIARY (See Travel Record for Travel Activity) • PLACE DAY BEGAN DATE (Mo., Day. Yr.) MAY 1. 1969 TIME DAY THE WHITE HOUSE ­ Washington. D. C. 8:00am Thursday PHONE TIME P=Placed R=Received ACTIVITY In Out Lo LD 8:00 The President had breakfast. 8:26 The President went to his office. 8:41 8:43 P The President talked with Congressman Emanuel Celler. The President held a staff meeting with: 8 :45 10:08 John D. Ehrlichman. Counsel 8 :50 9:58 H. R. Haldeman. Asst. 8 :50 9 :58 Bryce N. Harlow, Asst. 9:35 10:00 Henry A. Kissinger, Asst. for NSA 10:00 10:05 H. R. Haldeman, Asst. 10 :16 10 :26 The President.went to the Rose Garden and met with Represen­ tives and Award Winners from the President's Committee on Employment of the Handicapped. For further details and a list of attendees, see APPENDIX "A". 10:26 The President returned to his office. 10:37 11 :25 The President met and was photographed with: Roy Jenkins, British Chancellor of the Exchequer David M. Kennedy, Secretary of the Treasury John Harris, Aide to the Chancellor Emil Misbacher, Jr., Chief of Protocol Henry A. Kissinger, Asst. for NSA 11 :25 11:29 The President met with his Counsel, John D. Ehrlichman. 11 :29 12 :06 The President met with: Park Choong Hoon, Deputy Prime Minister of Korea Dong Jo Kim, Ambassador of Korea Yoon Sae Yang, Director of the Off. of Investment Promotion, Economic Planning Bd., of Korea Winthrop G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greatest Comeback Richard Nixon and the 1968 Election
    Nixon Legacy Forum Transcript: The Greatest Comeback Richard Nixon and the 1968 Election September 21, 2018 National Archives Building in Washington D.C. Panelists: Ken Khachigian: Research Staff, Agriculture Policy Aide (1968) Annelise Anderson: Research Staff, Domestic Issues Advisor (1968) Pat Buchanan: Speechwriter, Political Aide (1968) Dwight Chapin: Personal Aide to Richard Nixon (1968) Geoff Shepard, Moderator, White House Fellow (1969-70), Associate Director, White House Domestic Council (1970-74) David Ferriero: Good afternoon. I'm David Ferriero, the Archivist of the United States, and I'm pleased to welcome you to the William G. McGowan Theater here at the National Archives. In the many cases, welcome back to many of you. I'm particularly happy to welcome so many veterans of the Nixon administration who are here for this Nixon Legacy Forum, “The Greatest Comeback: Richard Nixon and the 1968 Election.” Some of you have already been participants in earlier Nixon forums. This is kind of a gathering of the clan. The last time we were all together was in Yorba Linda in October of 2016 for the opening of the new Nixon Library exhibit. And now, I can welcome you here to the National Archives. The first Nixon Legacy Forum was held right here in the McGowan Theater in January of 2010. Over the last eight years, there have been more than 30 of these forums covering all aspects, almost all aspects, of President Nixon's consequential administration. Most of them have been here in the McGowan Theater and most have been covered by C-SPAN. And it's good to see that C-SPAN is with us again today.
    [Show full text]
  • AWARDS Manhattan Institute 2012
    Recognizing individuals who are addressing some of America’s most difficult social problems SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AWARDS MANHATTAN INSTITUTE 2012 SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AWARDS MIssION STATemeNT he Manhattan Institute’s Social Entrepreneurship The William E. Simon Prize for TAwards honor nonprofit leaders who have founded Lifetime Achievement in Social Entrepreneurship innovative, private organizations to help address some of America’s most pressing social problems. The Awards in- The Simon Prize recognizes individuals who have founded clude two prizes. The William E. Simon Prize for Lifetime and led organizations that have been clearly effective in their Achievement in Social Entrepreneurship is presented to work and who have emerged as prominent public leaders the leader of an organization that has been both demon- in their fields. Past winners include George McDonald, strably effective and widely influential. An honorarium of founder of The Doe Fund, which has helped more than 3,500 $100,000 accompanies the Simon Prize. homeless New Yorkers graduate from the streets to work; Eunice Kennedy Shriver, whose key role in the Special Olympics The Richard Cornuelle Award for Social Entrepreneurship helped change the way that the developmentally disabled is given each year to up to five organizations that have dem- are viewed; Peter Flanigan, whose commitment to inner-city onstrated both effectiveness and the promise of significant students and Student Sponsor Partners has been changing impact. A prize of $25,000 is presented to the organization lives for many years; and Daniel Biederman, founder of founded or led by the award winner. the Bryant Park Corporation, 34th Street Partnership, and The Manhattan Institute Social Entrepreneurship Initiative is supported by funds from the William E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bohemian Grove and Other Retreats: a Study in Ruling-Class
    Contents 2021 Introduction & Update vii Original Preface xxvi 1 The Bohemian Grove 1 2 Other Watering Holes 60 3 Do Bohemians, Rancheros, and Roundup Riders Rule America? 82 Appendix of Heavies 112 Index 247 vi A New Introduction & Update (January 2021) New Findings, New Perspectives, Old Criticisms The Bohemian Grove is a 2,700-acre virgin redwood grove in Northern California, 75 miles north of San Francisco. It is a woodsy playground for the rich, the powerful, the famous, and their entertainers, who visit with each other during the last two weeks of July while camping out in cabins and tents. It’s an Elks Club for the rich, a fraternity party in the woods, a boy scout camp for old guys, complete with an initiation cer- emony and a totem animal, the owl. It’s owned by the Bohe- mian Club, which was founded in San Francisco in 1872. The Bohemians started going on their retreat shortly after the club was founded, but it was not big-time until the 1880s. So, why would a political sociologist, who is purportedly focused on the study of power, politics, and social change in the United States, bother to study the Bohemian Grove if it is not a place of power, and if everyone is too buzzed to talk busi- ness or have a serious discussion about policy? That’s a fair question, and an important one in terms of dif- ferentiating rival theories of power in the United States. The answer goes back to the kind of criticisms that used to be made of a class-domination theory by the most important group of theorists in the social sciences during the 20th century: the pluralists.
    [Show full text]
  • POPES and PRESIDENTS: the RELATIONSHIP of DOMESTIC POLITICS and RELIGION in INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS JANE SABES Andrews University
    Andntvs Universily Seminary Studies, Vol. 45, No. 1,45-61. Copyright O 2007 Andrews University Press. POPES AND PRESIDENTS: THE RELATIONSHIP OF DOMESTIC POLITICS AND RELIGION IN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS JANE SABES Andrews University Today's political scene is marked by Muslims in pursuit of Islamic-ruled states, Hasicfic Jews' appeals for restoration of a spiritually led Israel, and the Dalai Lama's personal campaign for reinstatement as both ruler and high priest of Tibet. These political aspirations, arising from religious segments of society, prompt one to consider the effect of ecclesiastical systems on politics. Ths article presents one such case study, relating the various forms that U.S. cfiplomatic ties have hstorically taken with the Vatican. Specifically, it examines how internal issues of political and religious diversity are played out in national affairs, and subsequently in the international arena. The research draws primarily on original source material from U.S. presidential libraries. The discussion appropriately begms with the formation of the Vatican City-State. A Shn'nking Temporal State-A Gming E cclesiastical Rome Popes ruled the Papal States for eleven centuries, beginning in 756 AD. Thus the resistance of Italian nationalists, in an effort to unify Italy as a political power, was not unexpected. The September 20, 1870, invasion of Rome eventually resulted in the 1929 Lateran Treaty that delmeated new ecclesiastical and political roles for both the Vatican and Italy. In this Treaty, the Pope renounced all claims to the former Papal States in exchange for Italy's recognition of the newly created, independent Vatican City. It declared the position of the pope to be sacred and inviolable, assured absolute and visible independence in his ecclesiastical role, and guaranteed the Holy See's indisputable sovereigntyin international matters.
    [Show full text]
  • White House Fellows Class of 1969–70 After 50 Years
    AWhite House Gamut Fellows Class ofof 1969–70 Leaders after 50 Years by Lincoln Caplan ABOUT THE AUTHOR Lincoln Caplan is a visiting lecturer in law and a senior research scholar at Yale Law School. He teaches writing there and in the Yale English Department. He was a staff writer for The New Yorker, was a member of the editorial board of The New York Times, and is the author of six books. He was a White House Fellow in 1979–80. Members of the White House Fellows class of 1969–70, with the support of the White House Fellows Foundation and Association, commissioned him to write this essay. © 2019 A Gamut of Leaders: The White House Fellows Class of 1969–70 after 50 Years A Gamut of Leaders The White House Fellows Class of 1969–70 after 50 Years by Lincoln Caplan Members of the White House Fellows Class of 1969–70 gather behind President Richard Nixon in the White House for the swearing- in ceremony. Photo by White House Photographer INTRODUCTION In June of 1969 in the White House, Arthur S. before, they had been told that they had been chosen Flemming, chairman of the President’s Commis- as Fellows; now, they were at the equivalent of a sion on White House Fellows, presented the new swearing-in ceremony, at the most important loca- class of fellows to President Richard M. Nixon in tion of American power. the White House’s East Room. There were 18 White House Fellows in the 1969-70 class, 16 men and two The imbalance of men and women reflected the women.
    [Show full text]
  • White House Special Files Box 21 Folder 21
    Richard Nixon Presidential Library White House Special Files Collection Folder List Box Number Folder Number Document Date Document Type Document Description 21 21 n.d. Report Report (continuation) regarding AID Daniel Cohen's and Martin Pera's association with it. 1pg. 21 21 n.d. Other Document Document stating incumbant and candidates for Chief of Protocol (International Organizations). 1pg. 21 21 11/19/1968 Letter Letter from Bernard Lasker to Rose Mary Woods mentioning Dan Lufkin being interested in joining the Commerce Dept. as well as himself wanting to be on the Business Advisory group. 2pgs. 21 21 11/20/1968 Letter Letter from Milton Rose to Leonard Garment recommending Smith Bagley to key positions within the new Administration. 1pg. 21 21 n.d. Photograph Photcopied photo of Marion Smoak. 1pg. 21 21 n.d. Report Detailed background information for Marion H. Smoak. 7pgs. Tuesday, May 26, 2009 Page 1 of 4 Box Number Folder Number Document Date Document Type Document Description 21 21 12/10/1968 Memo Memo for the record from CCK RE: L. Nicholas Ruwe. 1pg. 21 21 n.d. Other Document Document showing incumbant and candidates for Director, Bureau of Intelligence & Research (International Organization). 1pg. 21 21 12/04/1968 Memo Memo from Joel M. Fisher to Peter Flanigan RE: James Cross and his interest in various positions within Administration. 21 21 n.d. Other Document Brief biographical information for James Adam Cross. 1pg. 21 21 n.d. Report Personal & professionl background information for James Eliot Cross. 1pg. 21 21 12/05/1968 Letter Letter from Gilber Hahn to Peter Flanigan recommending James E.
    [Show full text]