AWARDS Manhattan Institute 2012
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Recognizing individuals who are addressing some of America’s most difficult social problems SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AWARDS MANHATTAN INSTITUTE 2012 SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AWARDS MIssION STATemeNT he Manhattan Institute’s Social Entrepreneurship The William E. Simon Prize for TAwards honor nonprofit leaders who have founded Lifetime Achievement in Social Entrepreneurship innovative, private organizations to help address some of America’s most pressing social problems. The Awards in- The Simon Prize recognizes individuals who have founded clude two prizes. The William E. Simon Prize for Lifetime and led organizations that have been clearly effective in their Achievement in Social Entrepreneurship is presented to work and who have emerged as prominent public leaders the leader of an organization that has been both demon- in their fields. Past winners include George McDonald, strably effective and widely influential. An honorarium of founder of The Doe Fund, which has helped more than 3,500 $100,000 accompanies the Simon Prize. homeless New Yorkers graduate from the streets to work; Eunice Kennedy Shriver, whose key role in the Special Olympics The Richard Cornuelle Award for Social Entrepreneurship helped change the way that the developmentally disabled is given each year to up to five organizations that have dem- are viewed; Peter Flanigan, whose commitment to inner-city onstrated both effectiveness and the promise of significant students and Student Sponsor Partners has been changing impact. A prize of $25,000 is presented to the organization lives for many years; and Daniel Biederman, founder of founded or led by the award winner. the Bryant Park Corporation, 34th Street Partnership, and The Manhattan Institute Social Entrepreneurship Initiative is supported by funds from the William E. Simon Foundation, the J. M. Kaplan Fund, and Nick Ohnell. Howard Husock, vice president for policy research at the Manhattan Institute, is director of the program. For both the Cornuelle Award and the Simon Prize, nominations may be submitted by anyone familiar with a person’s or group’s activities except for a current employee of that person or group. Award applications for 2013 will be available online at www.manhattan-institute.org/se after December 15, 2012, and will be accepted until February 28, 2013. Winners are selected by the Manhattan Institute with the assistance of the following selection committee: Anne Marie Burgoyne, Draper Richards Foundation; Howard Husock, Manhattan Institute; Cheryl Keller, foundation consultant; Leslie Lenkowsky, Indiana University; Adam Meyerson,The Philanthropy Roundtable; Lawrence Mone, Manhattan Institute; Sheila Mulcahy, William E. Simon Foundation; James Piereson, William E. Simon Foundation/Manhattan Institute; and William Schambra, Bradley Center for Philanthropy and Civic Renewal at the Hudson Institute. Grand Central Partnership, whose vision and use of pri- but acceptance of some government funding does not, in itself, vate, nonprofit management and finance has restored and preclude consideration. The Cornuelle Award recognizes the maintained some of New York City’s greatest public spaces. creative energy of the nonprofit sector by highlighting new ideas and approaches even by mature organizations. Nominations are accepted for the Simon Prize, but potential winners are not limited to those nominated. Any nonprofit organization that provides a direct service to address a public problem can be nominated for this award. Richard Cornuelle Award for Social Entrepreneurship Examples of such organizations include: Throughout its history, the United States has been distin- • Private social-services groups that assist the poor and disad- guished by the capacity of citizens to address social prob- vantaged with services designed to improve their prospects lems through new organizations established through private for success and upward mobility in American society; initiative. From Clara Barton and the American Red Cross • Reformative organizations that help people cope with to Millard Fuller and Habitat for Humanity, Americans moral or psychological problems, such as drug addic- have consistently come forward, without prompting or tion and criminal behavior; assistance from government, to organize nonprofit action • Education groups that improve children’s educational to improve American society by providing services to those achievement and possibilities through mentoring, in need. It is those who follow in such footsteps whom the counseling, or other after-school programs; Manhattan Institute seeks to recognize with its Richard • Community groups that improve the quality of life in Cornuelle Award for Social Entrepreneurship. their neighborhoods; and • Conservancies that use private donations from corpo- The characteristics of winning organizations have rations or individuals to purchase land and preserve it included: from development. • Energetic founding leaders with a strong vision; As many as 10 organizations may qualify for site visits, the • Provision of specific services to a clearly-targeted impressions and information from which will augment that group of those in need; provided by written nominations. Nonprofit organizations • Creative, entrepreneurial ways of meeting the that engage in political advocacy or that bring legal actions, organization’s goal; or whose primary activities are in response to government • Significant earned income and a diverse base of donors; grants are not eligible for this award. Individual schools • Clear and measurable results; and are not considered for the award, but novel approaches to • Use of volunteers. education may be considered. Recognition is reserved for those organizations whose guiding A complete list of award winners, 2001-12, can be found at purpose and function stem from private initiatives and ideas, http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/se_winners.htm. THE MANHAttAN INStitUTE The Man Who Named the ‘Independent Sector’: the Legacy of Richard Cornuelle By William Schambra May 5, 2011 a libertarian economic genius like Mr. Libertarianism may have offered a philo- von Mises could find in the late 1940s, sophically devastating analysis of the when big-government devotees utterly failures of government social programs dominated the American academy. and the superiority of free markets, in his view. But it failed to speak to our Mr. Cornuelle became a program officer irrepressible humanitarian impulses, for at one of the early foundations on the which government programs, however right, the William Volker Fund, where faulty, seemed to be the only politically he mined economics journals for telltale plausible expression. indications of libertarian tendencies. Once he discovered these scholars—typi- In Reclaiming the American Dream, Mr. cally scattered and disconnected loners Cornuelle outlined a way to deal with at lower-tier colleges—the foundation urgent social needs in a manner both Richard C. Cornuelle (1927–2011) would offer them what modest financial humane and free. Drawing on Alexis de support it could afford. Tocqueville (by no means as commonly ith the death of Richard cited then as today), he noted that “as WCornuelle last week at the age In a time when lurid headlines tell stories a frontier people, accustomed to inter- of 84, America’s “independent sector” of behemoth conservative foundations dependence, we developed a genius for has lost one of its most faithful and buying and selling public policy at will, solving common problems. People joined vigorous champions. it is hard indeed to imagine these hard- together in bewildering combinations to scrabble origins. As Mr. Cornuelle put found schools, churches, opera houses, Indeed, one of his claims to fame it, free-market advocates could fit in a co-ops, hospitals, to build bridges and was the very invention of the term phone booth, possessed by the “haunt- canals, to help the poor.” “independent sector,” deployed in his ing, subliminal suspicion that we were landmark 1965 volume Reclaiming the fighting not just a losing battle but a war Mr. Cornuelle maintained that we had all American Dream as a way to describe, already lost.” but forgotten this vast array of voluntary in the words of the book’s subtitle, “the civic associations—an “important third role of private individuals and volun- In a sentiment familiar to any founda- force” which he termed “the independent tary associations” in our national life. tion program officer, Mr. Cornuelle soon sector”—in our growing reliance on gov- cast covetous glances at the Volker grants ernment-financed, centrally administered, Richard Cornuelle was a life-long lib- going not to his projects but rather to professionally delivered social services. ertarian, convinced that “man’s power the small, local humanitarian groups over man should be strictly limited and that William Volker, who created the But he insisted that the human “desire that any design for social improvement foundation, said his philanthropy should to serve” was just as primal and power- that depended on government for its also support. Instead of converting those ful as the yearning for political power execution was ill-advised.” grants to his cause, however, they soon or material gain, and once unleashed, it converted Mr. Cornuelle to theirs—the could re-energize our voluntary associa- He developed this political outlook notion that human suffering was best tions and address our problems without in his studies with one of its pioneers, reduced by local voluntary efforts. Mr.