DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Aazpa Librarians Special Interest Group

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Aazpa Librarians Special Interest Group AAZPA LIBRARIANS SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP BIBLIOGRAPHY SERVICE The bibliography is provided as a service of the AAZPA LIBRARIANS SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP and THE CONSORTIUM OF AQUARIUMS, UNIVERSITIES AND ZOOS. TITLE: SUNI (Neotragus moschatus) BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR & INSTITUTION: Lisa Fitzgerald, Research Technician, Dallas Zoo 621 E. Clarendon, Dallas, TX 75203 DATE: August 1991 Allen, G.M. 1939. A checklist of African mammals. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology (Harvard), 83:1-763. Allen, J.A. 1909. Mammals from British East Africa, collected by the Tjader expedition of 1906. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 26:147-175. Bere, R.M. 1962. The Wild Mammals of Uganda. London:Longmans. Bigalke, R.C. 1968. Evolution of mammals on southern continents. III. The contemporary mammal fauna of Africa. Quarterly Review of Biology, 43:265-300. Bryden, H.A., ed. 1899. Great and Small Game of Africa. London:Rowland Ward, Ltd. Brynard, A.M. and U. de V. Pienaar. 1960. Annual report of the biologist 1958/1959, Kruger National Park. Koedoe,3:1-205. Burton, M. and R. Burton, eds. The International Wildlife Encyclopedia, Vol.17. New York:Marshall Cavendish Corporation. Dorst, J. 1970. A Field Guide to the Larger Mammals of Africa. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co. Emerson, K.C. and R.D. Price. 1971. Three new species of Mallophaga from African mammals. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 73(4):372-376. Georgiadis, N.J., P.W. Kat, H. Oketch, and J. Patton. 1990. Allozyme divergence within the Bovidae. Evolution, 44(8):2135-2149. Goebel, A.M., D.H. Whitmore, and B.L. Raphael. 1985. Hematological and serum chemistry values for captive suni (Neotragus moschatus zuluensis). Zoo Biology, 4:13-22. 1 Haltenorth, T. 1963. Klassifikation der Saugtiere: Artiodactyla I. In: Kukenthal's Handbuch der Zoologie, 8Bd(32-36), pp.1-167. Berlin:de Gruyler. Harper, F. 1945. Extinct and Vanishing Mammals of the Old World. New York;New York Zoological Park, American Committee for International Wildlife Protection Special Publication No.12. Heinichen, I.G. 1972. Preliminary notes on the suni, Neotragus moschatus and red duiker, Cephalophus natalensis. Zoologica Africana, 7(1):157-165. Heller, E. 1913. New races of antelopes from British East Africa. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 61(7):1-13. Hofmann, R.R. 1968. Comparisons of the rumen and omasum structure in East African game ruminants in relation to their feeding habits. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 21:179-194. ------. 1973. The Ruminant Stomach. In: Stomach Structure and Feeding Habits of East African Game Ruminants. Nairobi:East African Literature Bureau. [East African Monographs in Biology, Vol.2.] Hoppe, P.P. 1977. Comparison of voluntary food and water consumption and digestion in Kirk's dikdik and suni. East African Wildlife Journal, 15:41-48. ------ and M.D. Gwynne. 1978. Food retention time in the digestive tract of the suni antelope. Saugetierkundliche Mittellungen, 26:236-237. ------, W. van Hoven, W. von Engelhardt, R.A. Prins, A. Lankhorst, and M.D. Gwynne. 1983. Pregastric and caecal fermentation in dikdik (Madoqua kirki) and suni (Neotragus moschatus). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 75A(4):517-524. Hungate, R.E., G.D. Phillips, A. McGregor, D.P. Hungate, and H.K. Buechner. 1959. Microbial fermentation in certain mammals. Science, 130:1192-1194. Izard, J. and K. Umfleet. 1971. Notes on the care and breeding of the suni at Dallas Zoo. International Zoo Yearbook, 11:129. Khalil, L.F. and L.M. Gibbons. 1975. The helminth parasites of the suni, an African antelope from Kenya. Proceedings of the British Society of Parasitologists, 71(2):17. Kingdon, J. 1982. East African Mammals, An Atlas of Evolution in Africa, Vol.3C, Bovids. London:Academic Press. Lawson, D. 1989. The food habits of suni antelopes (Neotragus moschatus) (Mammalia:Artiodactyla). Journal 2 of Zoology (London), 217:441-448. Loskutoff, N. M., B.L. Raphael, L.A. Nemec, B.A. Wolfe, J.G. Howard, and D.C. Kraemer. 1990. Reproductive anatomy, manipulation of ovarian activity and non-surgical embryo recovery in suni (Neotragus moschatus zuluensis). Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 88: 521-532. Luce, D. 1987a. A method of predicting births in small antelope. Animal Keeper's Forum, 14(5):156-158. ------. 1987b. Small antelope capture and restraint techniques. Animal Keeper's Forum, 14(12):425-428. Matthews, L.H. 1971. The Life of Mammals, Vol.2. New York:Universe Books. Mochi, U. and T.D. Carter. 1971. Hoofed Mammals of the World. New York:Charles Scribner's Sons. Musewe, V.O., G.M.O. Maloiy, and J.K. Kanja. 1976. Evaporative water loss in two small African antelopes: The dik-dik and the suni. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 53C:17-18. Phillips, E.L. 1885. Notes on the antelopes of Somaliland. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1885:930-932. Pienaar, U. de V. 1963. The large mammals of the Kruger National Park - their distribution and present-day status. Koedoe, 6:1-37. Ralls, K. 1976. Mammals in which females are larger than males. Quarterly Review of Biology, 51:245-276. Raphael, B.L., J.G. Howard, and N.M. Loskutoff. 1987. Hormonal manipulation of the estrous cycle and ejaculate traits of suni antelope. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Zoo and Avian Medicine, pp.380-381. ------, N.M. Loskutoff, J.G. Howard, B.A. Wolfe, L.A. Nemec, M.C. Schiewe, and D.C. Kraemer. 1989. Embryo transfer and artificial insemination in suni (Neotragus moschatus zuluensis). Theriogenology, 31(1):244. ------, N.M. Loskutoff, L.A. Nemec, B.A. Wolfe, J.G. Howard, and D.C. Kraemer. 1988. Hormonal characterization and manipulation of the estrous cycle and nonsurgical embryo recovery in suni antelope. Theriogenology, 29(1):292. Sclater, W.L., ed. 1900. The Fauna of South Africa, Vol.1, Mammals. London:R.H. Porter. Shaw, M.B. 1980. The small, swift suni. Zoonooz (San Diego Zoo), 53(9):3. Smithers, R.H.N. 1966. The Mammals of Rhodesia, Zambia, and Malawi. London:Collins. 3 -------. 1986.-------. Land Mammals of Southern Africa: A Field Guide. Johannesburg:Macmillan South Africa. ------. 1988. The Mammals of the Southern African Region. Pretoria: University of Pretoria. Somers, M., O.A.E. Rasa, and P.J. Apps. 1990. Marking behaviour and dominance in suni antelope (Neotragus moschatus). Zeitschrift fur Saugetierkunde, 55:340-352. Stevenson-Hamilton, J. 1917. Animal Life in Africa, Vol.II. New York:E.P. Dutton and Co. Taylor, R.H. 1978. The suni Neotragus moschatus Van Dueben 1846. Natal Parks Board Research Communication, No.34. Thomas, O. 1900. List of mammals obtained by Mr. H.J. MacKinder during his recent expedition to Mount Kenya, British East Africa. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1900:173-180. True, F.W. 1892. An annotated catalogue of the mammals collected by Dr. W.L. Abbott in the Kilimanjaro region, East Africa. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 15:445-480. Van der Merwe, N.J. 1962. The position of nature conservation in South Africa. Koedoe, 5:1-122. Walker, E.P. 1975. Mammals of the World. Baltimore:John Hopkins University Press. Walther, F. 1972. Duikers, dwarf antelopes, and tragelaphinae. In: B. Grzimek, ed. Animal Life Encyclopedia, Vol.13, pp.308-330. New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold, Co. Whittow, G.C. 1978. Short ungulates. Natural History, 87(5):44-49. Wittenberger, J.F. and R.L. Tilson. 1980. The evolution of monogamy: Hypotheses and evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11:197-232. 44444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 This information is provided as a service of The Consortium of Aquariums, Universities and Zoos (C.A.U.Z.) Donna FitzRoy Hardy, Ph.D., Network Coordinator Consortium of Aquariums, Universities and Zoos Department of Psychology California State University, Northridge Northridge, CA 91330 44444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Risk of Importing Zoonotic Diseases Through Wildlife Trade, United States Boris I
    Risk of Importing Zoonotic Diseases through Wildlife Trade, United States Boris I. Pavlin, Lisa M. Schloegel, and Peter Daszak The United States is the world’s largest wildlife import- vidual animals during 2000–2004 (5). Little disease sur- er, and imported wild animals represent a potential source veillance is conducted for imported animals; quarantine is of zoonotic pathogens. Using data on mammals imported required for only wild birds, primates, and some ungulates during 2000–2005, we assessed their potential to host 27 arriving in the United States, and mandatory testing exists selected risk zoonoses and created a risk assessment for only a few diseases (psittacosis, foot and mouth dis- that could inform policy making for wildlife importation and ease, Newcastle disease, avian infl uenza). Other animals zoonotic disease surveillance. A total of 246,772 mam- mals in 190 genera (68 families) were imported. The most are typically only screened for physical signs of disease, widespread agents of risk zoonoses were rabies virus (in and pathogen testing is delegated to either the US Depart- 78 genera of mammals), Bacillus anthracis (57), Mycobac- ment of Agriculture (for livestock) or the importer (6). terium tuberculosis complex (48), Echinococcus spp. (41), The process of preimport housing and importation often and Leptospira spp. (35). Genera capable of harboring the involves keeping animals at high density and in unnatural greatest number of risk zoonoses were Canis and Felis (14 groupings of species, providing opportunities for cross- each), Rattus (13), Equus (11), and Macaca and Lepus (10 species transmission and amplifi cation of known and un- each).
    [Show full text]
  • The Social and Spatial Organisation of the Beira Antelope (): a Relic from the Past? Nina Giotto, Jean-François Gérard
    The social and spatial organisation of the beira antelope (): a relic from the past? Nina Giotto, Jean-François Gérard To cite this version: Nina Giotto, Jean-François Gérard. The social and spatial organisation of the beira antelope (): a relic from the past?. European Journal of Wildlife Research, Springer Verlag, 2009, 56 (4), pp.481-491. 10.1007/s10344-009-0326-8. hal-00535255 HAL Id: hal-00535255 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00535255 Submitted on 11 Nov 2010 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Eur J Wildl Res (2010) 56:481–491 DOI 10.1007/s10344-009-0326-8 ORIGINAL PAPER The social and spatial organisation of the beira antelope (Dorcatragus megalotis): a relic from the past? Nina Giotto & Jean-François Gerard Received: 16 March 2009 /Revised: 1 September 2009 /Accepted: 17 September 2009 /Published online: 29 October 2009 # Springer-Verlag 2009 Abstract We studied the social and spatial organisation of Keywords Dwarf antelope . Group dynamics . Grouping the beira (Dorcatragus megalotis) in arid low mountains in pattern . Phylogeny. Territory the South of the Republic of Djibouti. Beira was found to live in socio-spatial units whose ranges were almost non- overlapping, with a surface area of about 0.7 km2.
    [Show full text]
  • List of 28 Orders, 129 Families, 598 Genera and 1121 Species in Mammal Images Library 31 December 2013
    What the American Society of Mammalogists has in the images library LIST OF 28 ORDERS, 129 FAMILIES, 598 GENERA AND 1121 SPECIES IN MAMMAL IMAGES LIBRARY 31 DECEMBER 2013 AFROSORICIDA (5 genera, 5 species) – golden moles and tenrecs CHRYSOCHLORIDAE - golden moles Chrysospalax villosus - Rough-haired Golden Mole TENRECIDAE - tenrecs 1. Echinops telfairi - Lesser Hedgehog Tenrec 2. Hemicentetes semispinosus – Lowland Streaked Tenrec 3. Microgale dobsoni - Dobson’s Shrew Tenrec 4. Tenrec ecaudatus – Tailless Tenrec ARTIODACTYLA (83 genera, 142 species) – paraxonic (mostly even-toed) ungulates ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BOVIDAE (46 genera) - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Addax nasomaculatus - Addax 2. Aepyceros melampus - Impala 3. Alcelaphus buselaphus - Hartebeest 4. Alcelaphus caama – Red Hartebeest 5. Ammotragus lervia - Barbary Sheep 6. Antidorcas marsupialis - Springbok 7. Antilope cervicapra – Blackbuck 8. Beatragus hunter – Hunter’s Hartebeest 9. Bison bison - American Bison 10. Bison bonasus - European Bison 11. Bos frontalis - Gaur 12. Bos javanicus - Banteng 13. Bos taurus -Auroch 14. Boselaphus tragocamelus - Nilgai 15. Bubalus bubalis - Water Buffalo 16. Bubalus depressicornis - Anoa 17. Bubalus quarlesi - Mountain Anoa 18. Budorcas taxicolor - Takin 19. Capra caucasica - Tur 20. Capra falconeri - Markhor 21. Capra hircus - Goat 22. Capra nubiana – Nubian Ibex 23. Capra pyrenaica – Spanish Ibex 24. Capricornis crispus – Japanese Serow 25. Cephalophus jentinki - Jentink's Duiker 26. Cephalophus natalensis – Red Duiker 1 What the American Society of Mammalogists has in the images library 27. Cephalophus niger – Black Duiker 28. Cephalophus rufilatus – Red-flanked Duiker 29. Cephalophus silvicultor - Yellow-backed Duiker 30. Cephalophus zebra - Zebra Duiker 31. Connochaetes gnou - Black Wildebeest 32. Connochaetes taurinus - Blue Wildebeest 33. Damaliscus korrigum – Topi 34.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Conservation of Mini-Antelope: Proceedings of an International Symposium and on Duiker and Dwarf Antelope in Africa
    SPECIES CONCEPTS AND THE REAL DIVERSITY OF ANTELOPES F. P. D. COTTERILL Principal Curator of Vertebrates, Department of Mammalogy, Natural History Museum of Zimbabwe, P. O. Box 240, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe 2003. In A. Plowman (Ed.). Ecology and Conservation of Mini-antelope: Proceedings of an International Symposium and on Duiker and Dwarf Antelope in Africa. Filander Verlag: Füürth. pp. 59-118. Biodiversity Foundation for Africa, Secretariat: P O Box FM730, Famona, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe (Address for correspondence) email: [email protected] Abstract As for all biodiversity, society requires an accurate taxonomy of the Bovidae. We need to know what the different antelopes really are, and where these occur. Sound scientific, economic and aesthetic arguments underpin this rationale. This paper highlights some of the costs that result from the misconstrual of the real nature of species. Controversy reigns over which species concepts are most applicable to characterize biodiversity; a controversy magnified by how different species concepts create taxonomies of differing accuracy and precision. The contemporary taxonomy of the Mammalia continues to be based on the Biological Species Concept (BSC). Its deficiencies are too rarely acknowledged, and afflict apparently well known taxa of large mammals, notably the Bovidae. Errors in the BSC misconstrue natural patterns of diversity: recognizing too many (Type I errors), or too few species (Type II errors). Most insidious are Type III errors; where evolutionary relationships are misconstrued because the BSC cannot conceptualize, and thus ignores phylogenetic uniqueness. The general trend in current taxonomies of antelopes is to under represent true diversity - exemplified in the dikdiks (Type II errors). Misconstrual of phylogenetic relationships among species (Type III errors) appear rampant in these same taxonomies (the Cephalophini for example).
    [Show full text]
  • Zoologischer Anzeiger
    © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/;download www.zobodat.at 70 interest, as nothing was previously known of the ornithology of Mountserrat. — Mr. T. Jeffrey Parker read a paper on the intestinal spiral valve in the genus Rata. Mr. Parker showed that there were four types of valve exhibited in individuals of that genus, differing from one another in morphological characters, in the extent of absorption surface presented to the food, and in the resistance offered to the passage of food. — A communication was read from the Marquis de Folin on the Mollusca of the , Challenger' Expedition of the genera. Parastrop/iia, Watsonia and Coecum. — Professor W. H. Flower, LL.D., F. R. S., read a communication on the caecum of the Red Wolf [Cam's Juba inn) , in which it was shown that that animal differed from the ma- jority of the Canidae in possessing a very short and perfectly straight caecum. — A communication was read from Mr. Edward Bartlett containing a list of the Mammals and Birds collected by Mr. Thomas Waters in South East Betsileo, Madagascar. The collection contained a new species of Rodent be- longing to the genus Nesomys, and two new species of Birds of the genera Cypsehis and Zapornia. — Dr. A. Günther, F.R. S., read the description of a new species of Dwarf Antelope, obtained by Dr. Kirk near Brava in the South Somali country. Dr. Günther proposed for this new species the name of Neotragus Kirki. — A communication was read from Mr. Martin Jacob y containing the descriptions of new species of Phytophagous Coleoptera.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Priority Areas for the Conservation of Antelopes in the Republic of Guinea, West Africa, Using the Complementarity Approach
    Identifying priority areas for the conservation of antelopes in the Republic of Guinea, West Africa, using the complementarity approach D AVID B RUGIÈRE Abstract The Republic of Guinea has one of the highest harbours c. 50% of the total species of African antelope diversities of mammal species in West Africa. However, its (East, 1999) and, because of a high level of habitat degra- protected area network is poorly developed and little dation, habitat conversion to land crops, encroachment by quantitative information has been available to help guide livestock and hunting pressure, antelope populations are national conservation strategies. I therefore examined the more threatened in this region than elsewhere in Africa distribution of antelopes and related species (families (East, 1990, 1999). Thirteen of the 15 West African countries Bovidae and Tragulidae) across 17 sites, including four have lost at least one (and up to four) antelope species protected areas, to determine how the existing protected within the last 50 years (East, 1990). Conservation of area network contributes to the conservation of antelope antelope populations in West Africa is therefore a species and where action should best be focused for the continental priority (East, 1999). The Republic of Guinea conservation of this group. A total of 21 species of antelope (hereafter Guinea) is one of the largest West African have been recorded in the 17 sites; four of these species are countries but its mammalian fauna is one of the least known absent from the four protected areas. An iterative heuristic (Barnett & Prangley, 1997). Despite recent improvement in complementarity approach was used to determine an this knowledge (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Rarity, Trophy Hunting and Ungulates L
    Animal Conservation. Print ISSN 1367-9430 Rarity, trophy hunting and ungulates L. Palazy1,2, C. Bonenfant1, J. M. Gaillard1 & F. Courchamp2 1 Biometrie´ et Biologie E´ volutive, Villeurbanne, France 2 Ecologie, Systematique´ et Evolution, Orsay, France Keywords Abstract anthropogenic Allee effect; conservation; hunting management; trophy price; The size and shape of a trophy constitute major determinants of its value. mammals. We postulate that the rarity of a species, whatever its causes, also plays a major role in determining its value among hunters. We investigated a role for an Correspondence Anthropogenic Allee effect in trophy hunting, where human attraction to rarity Lucille Palazy. Current address: UMR CNRS could lead to an over-exploitative chain reaction that could eventually drive the 5558, Univ Lyon 1, 43 bd 11 nov, 69622 targeted species to extinction. We performed an inter-specific analysis of trophy Villeurbanne cedex, France. prices of 202 ungulate taxa and quantified to what extent morphological char- Tel: +33 4.72.43.29.35 acteristics and their rarity accounted for the observed variation in their price. We Email: [email protected] found that once location and body mass were accounted for, trophies of rare species attain higher prices than those of more common species. By driving trophy Editor: Iain Gordon price increase, this rarity effect may encourage the exploitation of rare species Associate Editor: John Linnell regardless of their availability, with potentially profound consequences for populations. Received 24 January 2011; accepted 16 May 2011 doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2011.00476.x Introduction et al., 1997). Moreover, the current worldwide trend of increasing wealth, in particular in the Middle East, Russia Over-exploitation of natural resources by humans is one and China (Dubois & Laurent, 1998; Guriev & Rachinsky, of the main causes of the current and dramatic loss of 2009), is likely to be paralleled by a growth in demand for biodiversity (Kerr & Currie, 1995; Burney & Flannery, sport hunting.
    [Show full text]
  • Antelopes, Gazelles, Cattle, Goats, Sheep, and Relatives
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. INTRODUCTION RECOGNITION The family Bovidae, which includes Antelopes, Cattle, Duikers, Gazelles, Goats, and Sheep, is the largest family within Artiodactyla and the most diverse family of ungulates, with more than 270 recent species. Their common characteristic is their unbranched, non-deciduous horns. Bovids are primarily Old World in their distribution, although a few species are found in North America. The name antelope is often used to describe many members of this family, but it is not a definable, taxonomically based term. Shape, size, and color: Bovids encompass an extremely wide size range, from the minuscule Royal Antelope and the Dik-diks, weighing as little as 2 kg and standing 25 to 35 cm at the shoulder, to the Asian Wild Water Buffalo, which weighs as much as 1,200 kg, and the Gaur, which measures up to 220 cm at the shoulder. Body shape varies from relatively small, slender-limbed, and thin-necked species such as the Gazelles to the massive, stocky wild cattle (fig. 1). The forequarters may be larger than the hind, or the reverse, as in smaller species inhabiting dense tropical forests (e.g., Duikers). There is also a great variety in body coloration, although most species are some shade of brown. It can consist of a solid shade, or a patterned pelage. Antelopes that rely on concealment to avoid predators are cryptically colored. The stripes and blotches seen on the hides of Bushbuck, Bongo, and Kudu also function as camouflage by helping to disrupt the animals’ outline.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Taxa for Which MIL Has Images
    LIST OF 27 ORDERS, 163 FAMILIES, 887 GENERA, AND 2064 SPECIES IN MAMMAL IMAGES LIBRARY 31 JULY 2021 AFROSORICIDA (9 genera, 12 species) CHRYSOCHLORIDAE - golden moles 1. Amblysomus hottentotus - Hottentot Golden Mole 2. Chrysospalax villosus - Rough-haired Golden Mole 3. Eremitalpa granti - Grant’s Golden Mole TENRECIDAE - tenrecs 1. Echinops telfairi - Lesser Hedgehog Tenrec 2. Hemicentetes semispinosus - Lowland Streaked Tenrec 3. Microgale cf. longicaudata - Lesser Long-tailed Shrew Tenrec 4. Microgale cowani - Cowan’s Shrew Tenrec 5. Microgale mergulus - Web-footed Tenrec 6. Nesogale cf. talazaci - Talazac’s Shrew Tenrec 7. Nesogale dobsoni - Dobson’s Shrew Tenrec 8. Setifer setosus - Greater Hedgehog Tenrec 9. Tenrec ecaudatus - Tailless Tenrec ARTIODACTYLA (127 genera, 308 species) ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BALAENIDAE - bowheads and right whales 1. Balaena mysticetus – Bowhead Whale 2. Eubalaena australis - Southern Right Whale 3. Eubalaena glacialis – North Atlantic Right Whale 4. Eubalaena japonica - North Pacific Right Whale BALAENOPTERIDAE -rorqual whales 1. Balaenoptera acutorostrata – Common Minke Whale 2. Balaenoptera borealis - Sei Whale 3. Balaenoptera brydei – Bryde’s Whale 4. Balaenoptera musculus - Blue Whale 5. Balaenoptera physalus - Fin Whale 6. Balaenoptera ricei - Rice’s Whale 7. Eschrichtius robustus - Gray Whale 8. Megaptera novaeangliae - Humpback Whale BOVIDAE (54 genera) - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Addax nasomaculatus - Addax 2. Aepyceros melampus - Common Impala 3. Aepyceros petersi - Black-faced Impala 4. Alcelaphus caama - Red Hartebeest 5. Alcelaphus cokii - Kongoni (Coke’s Hartebeest) 6. Alcelaphus lelwel - Lelwel Hartebeest 7. Alcelaphus swaynei - Swayne’s Hartebeest 8. Ammelaphus australis - Southern Lesser Kudu 9. Ammelaphus imberbis - Northern Lesser Kudu 10. Ammodorcas clarkei - Dibatag 11. Ammotragus lervia - Aoudad (Barbary Sheep) 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Forest Antelope Population Densities Using Distance Sampling with Camera Traps
    Estimating forest antelope population densities using distance sampling with camera traps R AJAN A MIN,HANNAH K LAIR,TIM W ACHER,CONSTANT N DJASSI A NDREW F OWLER,DAVID O LSON and T OM B RUCE Abstract Traditional transect survey methods for forest ante- concealed in dense vegetation, and the spoor and droppings lopes often underestimate density for common species and do are difficult to identify to species level with confidence (Rovero not provide sufficient data for rarer species. The use of camera & Marshall, ; Croes et al., ; van Vliet et al., ; trapping as a survey tool for medium and large terrestrial Jost Robinson et al., ). DNA-based amplification of mammals has become increasingly common, especially in for- species-specific mitochondrial DNA fragments from drop- esthabitats.Here,weappliedthedistancesamplingmethodto pings is possible, but time-consuming, expensive, and largely images generated from camera-trap surveys in Dja Faunal impractical with currently available analysis techniques (e.g. Reserve, Cameroon, and used an estimate of the proportion Breuer & Breuer-Ndoundou Hockemba, ;Bowkettetal., of time animals are active to correct for negative bias in the ; Bourgeois et al., ). Here, we present a method based density estimates from the -hour camera-trap survey data- on distance sampling with images from camera traps to sets. We also used multiple covariate distance sampling with obtain density estimates of forest antelopes. We demonstrate body weight as a covariate to estimate detection probabilities its use for monitoring the status of threatened forest antelopes and densities of rarer species. These methods provide an ef- in the Dja Faunal Reserve, southern Cameroon. fective tool for monitoring the status of individual species or a community of forest antelope species, information urgently Study area needed for conservation planning and action.
    [Show full text]
  • The Introduction of Alien Mammals Into the Broader Western and Northern Cape Provinces of South Africa
    The introduction of alien mammals into the broader Western and Northern Cape Provinces of South Africa A facsimile extract from Skead (2011) Graham Kerley and André Boshoff Centre for African Conservation Ecology Report No. 62 Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University April 2015 PO Box 77000 Port Elizabeth South Africa Introduction The ongoing debate on the occurrence, desirability and consequences of the introduction of alien (i.e. those species that do not occur in an area naturally) mammals into areas of South Africa (Castley et al. 2001, Cousins et al. 2010) highlights the need for a robust historical perspective on such introductions. Thus we need to know which species were introduced, when and where this happened, and also why such introductions took place. Alas, for most of South Africa there is a paucity of such information, as both the authorities responsible for the relevant policy and its application, as well as those who undertook these introductions, failed to maintain an accurate record; and the records that do exist are typically buried in obscure archives. As a consequence, we are left with a patchy, frequently romanticised, record of introductions of mammals that is of little help in explaining where and how (e.g. whether a species is free ranging or maintained in farmed system) alien mammals are currently distributed in South Africa. There is, however, one attempt to compile such an historical perspective, this for the broader Western Cape and Northern Cape provinces of South Africa. This material is published as a chapter in a book (Skead 2011) that may not be generally accessible.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of the Common Eland (Taurotragus Oryx) Estrous Cycle Parker M
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2009 Characterization of the common eland (Taurotragus oryx) estrous cycle Parker M. Pennington Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Animal Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Pennington, Parker M., "Characterization of the common eland (Taurotragus oryx) estrous cycle" (2009). LSU Master's Theses. 1542. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/1542 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHARACTERIZATION OF THE COMMON ELAND (TAUROTRAGUS ORYX) ESTROUS CYCLE A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Interdepartmental Program in the School of Animal Sciences by Parker Pennington B.S., Louisiana State University, 2007 August 2009 ACKNOWLEGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to express my deepest thanks and gratitude to my family for the constant support they have given me throughout my pursuit of this degree. Without my parents, Marilyn Mears and Tom Pennington, and their help (mentally and financially) I could not have completed this program. Though they may not completely understand the path I have undertaken, they have embraced it and me whole-heartedly. They have been my greatest supporters throughout my life and I look forward to the time when I can only begin to return what they have given to me.
    [Show full text]