DOCSLIB.ORG

Genista Ferox LC Taxonomic Authority: Poir

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Genista Ferox LC Taxonomic Authority: Poir Genista ferox LC Taxonomic Authority: Poir. Global Assessment Regional Assessment Region: Global Endemic to region Upper Level Taxonomy Kingdom: PLANTAE Phylum: TRACHEOPHYTA Class: MAGNOLIOPSIDA Order: FABALES Family: LEGUMINOSAE Lower Level Taxonomy Rank: Infra- rank name: Plant Hybrid Subpopulation: Authority: General Information Distribution Genista ferox is found in Algeria, Sardina, Morocco and Tunisia. Range Size Elevation Biogeographic Realm Area of Occupancy: Upper limit: 500 Afrotropical Extent of Occurrence: Lower limit: 0 Antarctic Map Status: Depth Australasian Upper limit: Neotropical Lower limit: Oceanian Depth Zones Palearctic Shallow photic Bathyl Hadal Indomalayan Photic Abyssal Nearctic Population There is currently no data available relating to the population size of this taxon. Total Population Size Minimum Population Size: Maximum Population Size: Habitat and Ecology This taxon has been collected from Mediterranean type forests, woodland, bushland and thicket. System Movement pattern Crop Wild Relative Terrestrial Freshwater Nomadic Congregatory/Dispersive Is the species a wild relative of a crop? Marine Migratory Altitudinally migrant Growth From Definition Shrub - size unkno Perennial shrub (any size), also termed a Phanerophyte if >1m or a Chamaephyte if <1m Growth From Definition Threats This taxon's known habitat is known to be under pressure from anthropogenic activities that include grazing and crop cultivation, urban expansion and the development of tourism infrastructure. This threats are general to the habitat and G. ferox is not considered to be specifically threatened or in decline at present. Past Present Future 13 None Conservation Measures There are a number of protected areas within the species range and seeds have been collected and stored by the Millennium Seed Bank Project as a method of ex situ conservation. In Place Needed 3 Research actions 3.2 Population numbers and range 3.3 Biology and Ecology 3.4 Habitat status 3.5 Threats 3.6 Uses and harvest levels 3.7 Cultural relevance 3.8 Conservation measures 3.9 Trends/Monitoring 4 Habitat and site-based actions 4.4 Protected areas 5 Species-based actions 5.7 Ex situ conservation actions Countries of Occurrence PRESENCE ORIGIN Year Breeding Non- Passage Possibly Extinct Presence Native Introduced Re- Vagrant Origin Round Season breeding migrant extinct uncertain Introduced uncertain only season only Algeria Italy Sardinia Morocco Tunisia General Habitats Score Description Major Importance 1 Forest 1 Suitable Unset 1.4 Forest - Temperate 1 Suitable Unset 3 Shrubland 1 Suitable Unset 3.8 Shrubland - Mediterranean-type Shrubby Vegetation 1 Suitable Unset 4 Grassland 1 Suitable Unset 4.4 Grassland - Temperate 1 Suitable Unset Species Utilisation Species is not utilised at all Purpose / Type of Use Subsistence National International 13. Pets/display animals, horticulture Trend in the level of wild offtake/harvest in relation to total wild population numbers over the last five years: Trend in the amount of offtake/harvest produced through domestication/cultivation over the last five years: CITES status: Not listed IUCN Red Listing Red List Assessment: (using 2001 IUCN system) Least Concern (LC) Red List Criteria: Date Last Seen (only for EX, EW or Possibly EX species): Is the species Possibly Extinct? Possibly Extinct Candidate? Rationale for the Red List Assessment G. ferox has a relatively large geographical distribution that far exceeds 20,000 km2. The taxon is known to occur within the protected areas network and not believe to be subject to any major threatening processess at present. This taxon is thus ratedas Least Concern. Reason(s) for Change in Red List Category from the Previous Assessment: Genuine Change Nongenuine Change No Change Genuine (recent) New information Taxonomy Same category Genuine (since first assessment) Knowledge of Criteria Criteria Revisio and criteria Incorrect data used Other Same category but previously change in criteria Current Population Trend: Stable Date of Assessment: 14/09/2010 Name(s) of the Assessor(s): Groom, A. Evaluator(s): Notes: % population decline in the past: Time period over which the past decline has been measured for applying Criterion A or C1 (in years or generations): % population decline in the future: Time period over which the future decline has been measured for applying Criterion A or C1 (in years or generations): Number of Locations: Severely Fragmented: Number of Mature Individuals: Bibliography Fennane, M.; Ibn Tattou, M.; Ouyahya, A. and El Oualidi, J., 2007, Flore Pratique du Maroc: Manuel de détermination des plantes vasculaires, , Institut Scientifique, Université Mohammed V., Agdal, Rabat International Legume Database and Information Service, 2005, Genista ferox02/03/2010, , , Jahandiez, E. & Maires, R., 1932, Catalogue des Plantes du Maroc. [vol. 2], , Minerva, Lechevalier éds., Alger., Quezel, P. & Santa, S., 1962, NOUVELLE FLORE DE L'ALGÉRIE et des régions désertiques méridionales. vol. [1], , CNRS., Paris., Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges, N.A., Moore, D.M. Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M. and Webb, D.A., 1968, Flora Europaea: Volume 2: Rosaceae to Umbelliferae, , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Genista Monspessulana – Montpellier Broom, Cape Broom, Canary Broom
    Application for WoNS candidacy Genista monspessulana – Montpellier Broom, Cape Broom, Canary Broom Contact: Ashley Millar - (08) 9334 0312; Department of Environment and Conservation (WA) October 2010 Introduction Genista monspessulana (L.) L.A.S.Johnson (Fabaceae), also known more commonly as Montpellier Broom, Cape Broom and Canary Broom, is a woody legume weed with significant current and potential impacts on forestry production, biodiversity of natural ecosystems, grazing systems, access to amenity areas and fire risk. Infestations occur in all temperate states of Australia, with particularly severe infestations in the Adelaide Hills, southern Tasmania, central and southern Great Dividing Range of NSW, central Victoria and south west WA. G. monspessulana was ranked 37th in the initial evaluation of weeds nominated for Weeds of Natural Significance (WONS) (Thorp and Lynch 2000), with a particularly high impact score due to its formation of dense, impenetrable thickets arising from a long-lived soil seed bank (source: Henry et al . 2010). Species description: G. monspessulana is an erect, perennial slender shrub which grows up to 5-6m. It has trifoliolate petiolate leaves which are more or less glabrous. This species has yellow flowers which are produced from August to January. G. monspessulana occurs in loamy soil through to lateritic and peaty sand and is commonly found along rivers and roadsides (Parsons and Cuthbertson 2001; FLORABASE DEC 2010). G. monspessulana is native to the Mediterranean region that has become established, and is considered a persistent and deleterious plant, in several other regions of the world, including the Americas, Australia and New Zealand. It is considered deleterious because of its ability to form dense almost mono-cultural stands, which replace and suppress native flora and economically valuable timber plants (Lloyd 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Europe's Threatened Plants
    Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation By Suzanne Sharrock and Meirion Jones May 2009 Recommended citation: Sharrock, S. and Jones, M., 2009. Conserving Europe’s threatened plants: Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Richmond, UK ISBN 978-1-905164-30-1 Published by Botanic Gardens Conservation International Descanso House, 199 Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3BW, UK Design: John Morgan, [email protected] Acknowledgements The work of establishing a consolidated list of threatened Photo credits European plants was first initiated by Hugh Synge who developed the original database on which this report is based. All images are credited to BGCI with the exceptions of: We are most grateful to Hugh for providing this database to page 5, Nikos Krigas; page 8. Christophe Libert; page 10, BGCI and advising on further development of the list. The Pawel Kos; page 12 (upper), Nikos Krigas; page 14: James exacting task of inputting data from national Red Lists was Hitchmough; page 16 (lower), Jože Bavcon; page 17 (upper), carried out by Chris Cockel and without his dedicated work, the Nkos Krigas; page 20 (upper), Anca Sarbu; page 21, Nikos list would not have been completed. Thank you for your efforts Krigas; page 22 (upper) Simon Williams; page 22 (lower), RBG Chris. We are grateful to all the members of the European Kew; page 23 (upper), Jo Packet; page 23 (lower), Sandrine Botanic Gardens Consortium and other colleagues from Europe Godefroid; page 24 (upper) Jože Bavcon; page 24 (lower), Frank who provided essential advice, guidance and supplementary Scumacher; page 25 (upper) Michael Burkart; page 25, (lower) information on the species included in the database.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Methods Results
    Papers and Proceedings Royal Society ofTasmania, Volume 1999 103 THE CHARACTERISTICS AND MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS OF THE VEGETATION AND FLORA OF THE HUNTINGFIELD AREA, SOUTHERN TASMANIA by J.B. Kirkpatrick (with two tables, four text-figures and one appendix) KIRKPATRICK, J.B., 1999 (31:x): The characteristics and management problems of the vegetation and flora of the Huntingfield area, southern Tasmania. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 133(1): 103-113. ISSN 0080-4703. School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University ofTasmania, GPO Box 252-78, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001. The Huntingfield area has a varied vegetation, including substantial areas ofEucalyptus amygdalina heathy woodland, heath, buttongrass moorland and E. amygdalina shrubbyforest, with smaller areas ofwetland, grassland and E. ovata shrubbyforest. Six floristic communities are described for the area. Two hundred and one native vascular plant taxa, 26 moss species and ten liverworts are known from the area, which is particularly rich in orchids, two ofwhich are rare in Tasmania. Four other plant species are known to be rare and/or unreserved inTasmania. Sixty-four exotic plantspecies have been observed in the area, most ofwhich do not threaten the native biodiversity. However, a group offire-adapted shrubs are potentially serious invaders. Management problems in the area include the maintenance ofopen areas, weed invasion, pathogen invasion, introduced animals, fire, mechanised recreation, drainage from houses and roads, rubbish dumping and the gathering offirewood, sand and plants. Key Words: flora, forest, heath, Huntingfield, management, Tasmania, vegetation, wetland, woodland. INTRODUCTION species with the most cover in the shrub stratum (dominant species) was noted. If another species had more than half The Huntingfield Estate, approximately 400 ha of forest, the cover ofthe dominant one it was noted as a codominant.
    [Show full text]
  • “Don't Plant a Pest: Central Coast” Brochure
    G roundcovers & Perennials G roundcove rs & Perennials G roundcove rs & Perennials G a rdening green Many of the characteristics that make a G roundcove rs plant a good choice for the garden may Instead of periwinkle, wild ginger also make it a successful invader: & Perennials DON’T PLAN T: English ivy or Algerian ivy, (Asarum caudatum) Don’t California is a gardener’s dream. Our mild climate allows A California native, this Garden Plants Invasive Plants us to have fantastic gardens, showcasing a wide variety periwinkle evergreen groundcover has Easy to propagate Broad germination T RY THESE VARIETIES: of ornamental plants from DON’T PLAN T: (Vinca major) heart-shaped leaves and unusual Establish rapidly Colonizer all around the world. This aggressive grower pachysandra maroon flowers. Mature early Mature early iceplant or Hottentot fig Howitt, © 1999 Beatrice F. Calif. Academy of Sciences has trailing stems that Plant a But sometimes, our Abundant flowers Prolific seeds (Carpobrotus edulis) (Pachysandra terminalis) root wherever they touch bear’s foot hellebore garden plants “jump the Pest / disease tolerant Few natural predators Small mammals can carry seeds of Grows more slowly than Vinca the soil. This ability to and Hedera, but has a crisp, (Helleborus foetidus) fence” and invade natural iceplant from landscape settings to resprout from stem areas. These invasive nearby coastal dunes and other neat growth form. New foliage Unusual foliage and delicate, Invasive plants are by nature a regional problem. A plant fragments enables is bright green, changing to complex flowers. The intriguing plants can become serious sensitive areas. The vigorous Alfred Brousseau, © 1995 Br.
    [Show full text]
  • Declared Plant
    DECLARED PLANT White weeping brooms Retama monosperma , R etama raetam January 2015 White weeping brooms are introduced ornamental shrubs growing to 4 m high, with leafless weeping branches and small white flowers. They are declared under the Natural Resources Management Act 2004; sale is prohibited and land owners may be required to control infestations in the Alinytjara Wilurara, Eyre Peninsula, SA Murray Darling Basin and South East NRM regions. Family: Fabaceae Synonyms: Genista raetam, Lygos raetam, Spartium monospermum, Genista monosperma, Lygos monosperma. Origin: Northern Africa and western Sahara, Sicily and the Middle East. The most drought-tolerant of the exotic brooms in Australia. WHY ARE THEY A PROBLEM? After being widely planted for ornament, white weeping brooms have escaped to become woody weeds of native vegetation and unimproved pasture. invade heath, scrub and woodland in coastal sandy habitats. form a shrub layer that outcompetes and shades out indigenous species. may infest grazing land, decreasing carrying capacity and land value. are unpalatable (bitter tasting) so animals avoid grazing on them, leaving them free to spread. DESCRIPTION Habit: shrub 2 to 4 m high and up to 6 m wide, with leafless, weeping branches. Leaves: very small leaves (approx.. 5 mm x 1mm) which drop, leaving blue-green, leafless stems for most of the year. Stems: short trunk branching from base, with weeping branches. Roots: shallow roots and very strong, deep tap root. Flowers: small, white, pea flowers, 8-10 mm on racemes of 3-15 flowers. Flowering time: July-October. Seed: 1-2 kidney-shaped seeds are contained in small pods.
    [Show full text]
  • Cytisus Scoparius (L.) J.H.F
    Cytisus scoparius (L.) J.H.F. Link Scotch Broom (Genista andreana, Genista scoparia, Sarothamnus scoparius, Sarothamnus vulgaris, Spartium scoparium) Other Common Names: Broomtops, Common Broom, European Broom, Irish Broom, Scottish Broom. Family: Fabaceae (Leguminosae); sometimes placed in Papilionaceae . Cold Hardiness: USDA zones 6 (5) to 7 (8). Foliage: Alternate, semi-evergreen to deciduous, trifoliate (mostly) to simple (tips of some twigs) leaves are small, ¼O to eO long, medium to dark green in color, but covered in open whitish pubescence, lending a frosted appearance to the margins; no significant fall color develops. Flower: Flowering occurs in spring from buds on old wood with one or two bright yellow :O to 1O diameter indi- vidual flowers; the back petal is the largest and is bilobed; this petal may be yellow (most common color), pink, orangish red, to red outside; flowers are numerous and very showy in bloom. Fruit: Small seeds are borne in 1½O to 2O long pea pod-like explosively dehiscent fuzzy capsules; pods mature from green to tan-brown at maturity, but are not ornamentally effective. Stem / Bark: Stems — young stems are thin, stiff and held erect in a wisp-broom fashion; young and intermediate stems are square in cross-section; new growth is covered in a sparse white pubescence which is slowly lost as the twigs mature; the bark is initially bright green, becoming mottled white and brown as twigs age; Buds — 1 1 nearly foliose with poorly formed bud scales, the tiny /32O to /16O long roundish green buds are tightly ap- pressed to the stems; Bark — bark changes as stems age from green on new twigs, mottled green and brown on older twigs, to striated green and brown on young limbs, to smooth greenish gray to brownish gray on older trunks.
    [Show full text]
  • Don't Plant a Pest!
    Many of the characteristics that make a plant Gardening green an attractive choice for the garden may also make it a successful invader: California is a gardener’s dream. Our mild climate Don’t allows us to have fantastic gardens, showcasing a wide Garden Plants: Invasive Plants: variety of ornamental Easy to propagate Broad germination plants from all around Establish rapidly Colonizer the world. Mature early Mature early Abundant flowers Prolific seeds plant a But sometimes, our Pest/disease tolerant Few natural predators garden plants “jump the fence” and invade Invasive plants are by nature a regional problem. A natural areas. These plant that jumps out of the garden in one climate and invasive plants can habitat type may behave perfectly in another. The become serious wildland twelve problem plants listed here have escaped from pest! weeds that threaten gardens throughout the greater Bay Area. California’s biodiversity and economy. How to use this brochure: This brochure suggests safe alternatives for these More than half of the plants. When you are buying new plants, consider these Give them an inch and plants currently Conservancy Nature The Rice, Barry alternatives, or ask your local nursery for other damaging California’s French broom invades Bay Area hillsides non-invasive plants. If one of the invasive plants is wildlands were originally introduced for landscaping already in your yard, especially if you live near they’ll take an acre... purposes. Garden escapes like pampasgrass and Scotch wildlands, you may want to remove it and replace it broom may have desirable characteristics in a garden with a recommended alternative.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Retardant Plants for the Urban Fringe and Rural Areas
    Flammability Groups Leptospermum scoparium TN Pittosporum undulatum AN X Cucurbita maxima E Pumpkin Morus sp. E Mulberry Manuka, Teatree Sweet Pittosporum Cymbopogon citratus E Lemon Grass Myoporum insulare AN Boobyalla In the following list E denotes an exotic plant, TN a plant Lomandra longifolia TN Saggs Platanus x acerifolia E Plane Tree Cyphomandra betacea E Tamarillo Nerium oleander E Oleander native to Tasmania, AN a plant native to mainland Australia Melaleuca alternifolia AN Paperbark Poa sp. AN Poa Grass Delonix regia E Poinciana Olearia argophylla TN Musk Monstera deliciosa E Monstera Populas sp. E Poplar and X a known environmental weed. Dicksonia antarctica TN Man Fern Photinia glabra var. rubens E Nadina domestica E Sacred Bamboo Quercus robur E English oak Diospryros sp. E Persimmon Chinese Fire Bush or Red-leafed Photinia High Flammability Nicotiana glauca AN Tobacco Bush Spiraea catoniensis E May Eriobotrya japonica E Loquat Pittosporum bicolor TN Cheesewood Pinus elliottii E Tasmannia lanceolata TN Escallonia macrantha E Escallonia These plants have been shown to be highly flammable and Slash or Elliott’s Pine Native Pepper Pteridium esculentum TN Euryops pectinatus E Bracken Fern should not be planted or allowed to remain inside your house’s Pinus patula E Ulex europaeus E X Gorse Yellow Daisy Bush Mexican or Weeping Pine Rhododendron sp. E Rhododendron Building Protection Zone. They should also be avoided in the Viburnum opulus E Guelder Rose Genista monspessulana E X Montpellier Broom Rosa sp. E X Roses, Briars Fuel Modified Zone. Move these plants away from your house Moderate Flammability Koelreuteria paniculata E Salix babylonica E Weeping Willow and replace them with less flammable plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Genista Monspessulana (L.) L
    WRITTEN FINDINGS OF THE WASHINGTON STATE NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL BOARD DRAFT August 24, 2012 Scientific name: Genista monspessulana (L.) L. A. S. Johnson Synonyms: Cytisus monspessulanus L., Cytisus monspessulanus var. umbellulatus (Webb) Briq., Teline candicans var. umbellulatus Webb & Berthel., Teline monspessulana (L.) K. Koch Common name: French broom, canary broom, cape broom, Montpellier broom, soft broom Family: Fabaceae Legal Status: Proposed Class A noxious weed Description and Variation: (Unless otherwise noted, information in this section is from DiTomaso and Healy (2007). Overall Habit: Genista monspessulana is a shrub in the Fabaceae (legume) family that typically grows less than 3 m (10 feet) tall but sometimes grows to 5 m (16 feet) tall (Baldwin et al. 2012, Bossard 2000). Plants can be evergreen or deciduous; in California G. monspessulana keeps much of its leaves in coastal areas and loses more of its leaves in inland areas (Bossard 2000). Stems are erect, typically leafy and covered in silky, silvery hairs (Baldwin et al. 2012, Stace 2010). Younger stems are green and round in cross-section and often strongly 8-10 ridged, while older stems are brown and may not have ridges. Roots: Genista monspessulana is a taprooted shrub that has fine roots associated with nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Leaves: Leaves are alternately arranged with a petiole (<5mm) and compound with 3 leaflets (Baldwin et al. 2012). Leaflets are oblong to obovate and variable in size with most 10-20 mm long, with the length generally +/- 2 times the width (Baldwin et al. 2012). The leaf’s upper and lower surface is sparsely to densely covered with appressed short, silvery hairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Plantings Guide
    SUSTAINABLE PLANTINGS GUIDE CITY OF WILDWOOD, MO MAY 2009 13545 Barrett Parkway Drive Suite 200 St. Louis, MO 63021 Ph 314-984-8211 Fax 314-822-7858 TABLE OF CONTENTS FORWARD 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 4 PLANNING AND DESIGN Landscape Development Plan 5 Landscape Components 5 Plant Materials 6 Structures 8 Mulches 9 Irrigation 11 Grading/Contouring 11 Lighting 12 Water (as a design feature) 12 PLANT MATERIALS Selection and Location 12 Landscape Style 13 Pastures, Meadows and Prairies 13 Pastures 13 Meadows/Prairies 15 Grasses 20 Native Grasses 20 Ornamental Grasses 25 Lawn Care 27 Ground Covers and Perennials 28 Trees and Shrubs 33 Evergreen Trees 33 Deciduous Trees 37 Evergreen Shrubs 50 Deciduous Shrubs 51 NOTE: ADDITIONAL SUSTAINABLE (WATER CONSERVING) PLANT SPECIES AND PLANT MATERIAL INFORMATION ARE AVAILABLE ON THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN WEBSITE http://www.mobot.org/gardeninghelp/plantinfo.shtml SOIL 71 MULCH 72 IRRIGATION 72 MAINTENANCE 73 EXAMPLES – Sustainable Landscapes 74 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE HARDINESS ZONE MAP 82 GLOSSARY 83 1 FORWARD During the later part of the summer, 2007, a number of area property owners began to experience issues relating to the availability of potable water from their private residential wells. Adequate provision of potable water to residential properties is crucial for their use and the issue was taken with the utmost seriousness by the City. City Council was advised of the situation and immediately sought answers to questions relating to the water supply concerns and how the problem might be addressed in a responsible and expedient manner. One of the primary concerns of the City Council was the condition of the aquifer that provides potable groundwater to many of the rural residential tracts in Wildwood.
    [Show full text]
  • Phoenix AMA LWUPL
    Arizona Department of Water Resources Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Official Regulatory List for the Phoenix Active Management Area Fourth Management Plan Arizona Department of Water Resources 1110 West Washington St. Ste. 310 Phoenix, AZ 85007 www.azwater.gov 602-771-8585 Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Acknowledgements The Phoenix AMA list was prepared in 2004 by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) in cooperation with the Landscape Technical Advisory Committee of the Arizona Municipal Water Users Association, comprised of experts from the Desert Botanical Garden, the Arizona Department of Transporation and various municipal, nursery and landscape specialists. ADWR extends its gratitude to the following members of the Plant List Advisory Committee for their generous contribution of time and expertise: Rita Jo Anthony, Wild Seed Judy Mielke, Logan Simpson Design John Augustine, Desert Tree Farm Terry Mikel, U of A Cooperative Extension Robyn Baker, City of Scottsdale Jo Miller, City of Glendale Louisa Ballard, ASU Arboritum Ron Moody, Dixileta Gardens Mike Barry, City of Chandler Ed Mulrean, Arid Zone Trees Richard Bond, City of Tempe Kent Newland, City of Phoenix Donna Difrancesco, City of Mesa Steve Priebe, City of Phornix Joe Ewan, Arizona State University Janet Rademacher, Mountain States Nursery Judy Gausman, AZ Landscape Contractors Assn. Rick Templeton, City of Phoenix Glenn Fahringer, Earth Care Cathy Rymer, Town of Gilbert Cheryl Goar, Arizona Nurssery Assn. Jeff Sargent, City of Peoria Mary Irish, Garden writer Mark Schalliol, ADOT Matt Johnson, U of A Desert Legum Christy Ten Eyck, Ten Eyck Landscape Architects Jeff Lee, City of Mesa Gordon Wahl, ADWR Kirti Mathura, Desert Botanical Garden Karen Young, Town of Gilbert Cover Photo: Blooming Teddy bear cholla (Cylindropuntia bigelovii) at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monutment.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantitative Field Surveys for the Selection of Biological Control
    Quantitative field surveys for the selection of biological control agents for Genista monspessulana, based on host range and efficacy assessment Andy Sheppard and Thierry Thomann1 Summary Surveys for potential biological control agents of weeds provide opportunities to collect detailed quan- titative data on the community structure of phytophagous species associated with particular plant species and their close relatives. Such studies are still few and far between, but offer increased under- standing of assemblage rules of species with different degrees of host-plant specialization and the numbers and abundances of species in different feeding guilds. Including a range of closely related host plants also allows comparison of natural enemy community structure across similar host-plant species with different local abundances and regional distributions. When such surveys also measure agent impact, they allow agent selection to be based on efficacy as well as specificity. The preliminary results of quantitative surveys of natural enemy communities on species in the tribe Genisteae, particularly Genista monspessulana (French, Montpellier or Cape broom), around the Mediterranean, are presented. Sampling consisted of fixed beating-tray samples on up to ten individual flowering plants per site. Seed pods were also collected from the plants when they matured, and then dissected to quan- tify attack and abundance of seed feeders. Insects collected were sorted to species, and counted and analyzed for species diversity by site and region. Sample sites were selected based on the co-occurrence of two to several host-plant species to allow comparison of host use and abundance. Analysis of the preliminary results is discussed together with the value of quantitative field surveys in biological weed control.
    [Show full text]