Marcel Studies, Vol. 2, Issue No. 1, 2017 The Meaningless Life Is Not Worth Living: Critical Reflections on Marcel’s Critique of Camus GEORGE HEFFERNAN, Department of Philosophy, Merrimack College, North Andover, Massachusetts.
[email protected] Abstract: Gabriel Marcel (1889–1973) and Albert Camus (1913–1960) both resist categorization as thinkers. Marcel may be regarded as a “Christian existentialist,” though he eventually questioned this label, and Camus has been viewed as the “philosopher of the absurd,” though he soon grew uneasy with this designation. Indeed, it is often overlooked that Camus’s thought underwent a remarkable shift from a preoccupation with the ineluctability of absurdity to a concentration on the possibility of revolt. It is also underappreciated that Marcel presented a detailed critique of Camus’s thought, though the reverse did not happen. The purpose of this paper is to outline Marcel’s critique of Camus and to examine its merits and demerits. The question is what role, if any, Marcel’s critique played in the passage of Camus’s thought from solitary resignation to the absurdity of the world to collective revolt against the injustice of human beings to their fellows. Introduction: A Hint at a Missed Opportunity In March, 1940, Albert Camus, having earned a diploma in philosophy from the University of Algiers (1936) and working mainly and mostly as a journalist in his native Algeria, settled in Paris to seek his future as a writer. He had previously published two slender collections of lyrical essays, L’Envers et l’Endroit/The Wrong Side and the Right Side (1937) and Noces/Nuptials (1939), with a small Algerian press, but he was generally unknown to the reading public of metropolitan France.