DOCSLIB.ORG

A Critique of Humoristic Absurdism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Critique of Humoristic Absurdism A Critique of Humoristic Absurdism A Critique of Humoristic Absurdism Problematizing the legitimacy of a humoristic disposition toward the Absurd A Critique of Humoristic Absurdism Copyright © 2020 Thom Hamer Thom Hamer All rights reserved. No part of this thesis may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any way or by any means without the prior permission of the author or, when applicable, of the publishers of the scientific papers. Image on previous page: Yue Minjun (2003), Garbage Hill Student number: 3982815 Graphic design: Mirelle van Tulder Date: February 5th 2020 Printed by Ipskamp Printing Word count: 32,397 Institution: Utrecht University Contents Study: Research Master Philosophy Summary 9 Document: Final Thesis Foreword 10 Supervisor: prof. dr. Paul Ziche Introduction 12 Second Reader: dr. Hans van Stralen 1. The Philosophy of Humor 21 Third Reader: prof. dr. Mauro Bonazzi 1.1. A history of negligence and rejection 24 1.2. Important distinctions 33 1.3. Theories of humor 34 1.4. Defense of the Incongruity Theory 41 1.5. Relevance of relief and devaluation 52 1.6. Operational definition 54 2. The Notion of the Absurd 59 2.1. Camusian notion: meaninglessness 61 2.2. Tolstoyan notion: mortality 63 2.3. Nagelian notion: trivial commitments 67 2.4. Modified notion: dissolution of resolution 71 2.5. Justificatory guideline for a disposition toward the Absurd 78 3. Humoristic Absurdism 83 3.1. What is Humoristic Absurdism? 85 3.2. Cultural expressions of Humoristic Absurdism 87 3.3. Defense of Humoristic Absurdism 92 4. Objections against the humoristic disposition toward the Absurd 101 4.1. The Superiority Objection 103 4.2. The Irrationality Objection 112 4.3. The Irresponsibility Objection 125 4.4. The Frivolity Objection 131 5. Metamodern Absurdism 141 5.1. What is metamodernism? 143 5.2. What is Metamodern Absurdism? 148 5.3. Preliminary Defense of Metamodern Absurdism 152 6. Conclusion 157 Bibliography 163 Summary 9 To what extent can humorism be a legitimate disposition toward the Summary Absurd? The Absurd is born from the insurmountable contradiction between one’s ceaseless striving and the absence of an ultimate resolution – or, as I prefer to call it, the ‘dissolution of resolution’. Humoristic Absurdism is the commitment to a pattern of humorous responses to the Absurd, which regard this absurd condition, as well as its manifestation in absurd situations, as a comical phenomenon. Although the humoristic disposition seems promising, by virtue of humor’s recognition of incongruity and its denial of an ultimate resolution, and succeeds in countering three major objections, it falls prey to the claim that comprehensive humorism portrays as frivolous what is earnest, thereby renouncing the gravity of the desire for ultimate resolution, which is fundamental to the notion of the Absurd. In an attempt to explore alternative roles for humor in a legitimate disposition toward the Absurd, Metamodern Absurdism is suggested, which revolves around a post-ironic oscillation between humor and earnestness. In short, only in a role limited to one pole of an oscillatory pattern of responses can humor be integrated in a legitimate disposition toward the Absurd. 11 projects for that matter, you acknowledge my passion for philosophy, which 10 Foreword is more than I could have hoped for. Before you lies the thesis ‘A Critique of Humoristic Absurdism’. It has been Foreword written as part of the final course (30 ECTS) of the Research Master’s In addition, I would like to thank my friend Eva Bernet Kempers for being Foreword Program in Philosophy at Utrecht University. I was engaged in researching the funniest critic of humor. Her extensive summation of counterarguments and writing this thesis from February 2019 to January 2020. and examples in opposition to the Incongruity Theory of humor has had tremendous impact upon my account of humor, although I remain stubborn The process of writing this thesis has not been spotless. Not because in my contention that humor essentially involves incongruity. I stumbled upon inexorable contradictions within the argument, nor because of some other problem immanent to this philosophical inquiry. I cannot conclude this project without thanking the most important Rather, the difficulty stemmed from medical hindrances. Due to supporter of my writings in general and this project in particular: Marvik workaholic tendencies, along with the fact that my main activities involve van Dijk. Our friendship has always been defined by a deep awareness of micromovements (writing, composing, drawing, painting), I got diagnosed the Absurd with an eccentric sense of humor. Thank you for your emotional with RSI (repetitive strain injury). This prevented me from progressing as support, substantive discussions and your exemplary humorism in the face much as I would have liked. of the Absurd. Luckily, I enjoyed widespread support during this struggle, for which To my readers: thank you for taking the time to read this text. I hope you I would like to thank study advisor Marloes Lammerts, my primary enjoy this philosophical inquiry, if not for its coherent argumentation, then supervisor prof. dr. Paul Ziche and RMA coordinators dr. Joel Anderson and for its risible incongruities. prof. dr. Mauro Bonazzi. I would also like to thank my supervisors for their substantive guidance. As my first supervisor, prof. dr. Paul Ziche has played Thom Hamer a decisive role in the progression of this thesis, with his mind-boggling encyclopedic knowledge, lucid awareness of semantic and etymological Utrecht subtleties and thorough analysis of my argumentation. My second reader February 5th, 2020 dr. Hans van Stralen has helped me with the investigation of humorism in the face of the Absurd by fleshing out, from literary as well as philosophical texts, the notion of the Absurd, as well as possible responses to the absurd condition. Outside of the academic domain, I thank my parents, for supporting me in my academic and literary endeavors. Although you might not at all understand what I am saying in this thesis, or in other philosophical 13 12 Introduction that revolves around humor), by establishing a defendable and historically There is but one truly serious philosophical problem and that is rooted account of humorism as a disposition toward the incongruity that Introduction suicide. Judging whether life is or is not worth living amounts to makes up the Absurd and by challenging it with some objections that answering the fundamental question of philosophy. All the rest – have been raised against humorism as a general behavioral pattern (i.e., 3 whether or not the world has three dimensions, whether the mind humorism without a specified object such as the Absurd). Humoristic Introduction has nine or twelve categories – comes afterwards. These are games; Absurdism is defined as the commitment to a pattern of humorous one must first answer. And if it is true, as Nietzsche claims, that a responses to the Absurd, which regard the absurd condition, as well as 4 philosopher, to deserve our respect, must preach by example, you its manifestations in absurd situations, as a comical phenomenon. I call can appreciate the importance of that reply, for it will precede the this commitment the ‘humoristic disposition’. Such a disposition should definitive act. These are facts the heart can feel; yet they call for not be understood as a way to overcome the Absurd, for if one accepts careful study before they become clear to the intellect.1 the notion of the Absurd, one accordingly acknowledges its insuperability. Rather, the humoristic disposition should be understood as an Absurdist Contrary to the meaning of ‘Absurdism’ in everyday discourse, referring coping mechanism, that is, one that provides a way to deal with the absurd to a form of humor associated with, for example, Monty Python, very few condition without manifesting one or another form of denial. writers in the philosophical tradition of Absurdism think of absurdity as a How ought we to understand the legitimacy of a disposition toward source of laughter and mirth. The above-quoted opening paragraph of The the Absurd? First, in order for it to be legitimate, the disposition should be Myth of Sisyphus (1942), arguably the most important essay in the history possible, both theoretically and practically. Theoretical impossibility might of Absurdism, leaves no room for doubt regarding the primary status of the be manifested, for instance, in a disposition that would literally prescribe Absurd: it is a tragedy. Indeed, the Absurd is so dreadfully tragic that one the attainment of omnipotence in the face of the Absurd. The same holds for response seems natural at first sight: suicide. Yet, humorous responses to logical impossibilities: a disposition ought not to propagate both affirmation the absurd condition have not been absent from human history. Legend and denial, or promiscuity and chastity. Regarding the subsidiary condition has it that one of the early Christian martyrs, Saint Lawrence, cheerfully of practical possibility, consider the hypothetical example of never-ending shouted, after having been roasted on a gridiron for hours and hours: “I’m euphoria. This may be theoretically possible, but it is difficult to imagine well done! Turn me over!” Recently, philosophers such as John Marmysz within the constraints of the human psyche a euphoric state of mind that and Bob Plant have attempted to justify such a humoristic disposition in the lasts for years and years, let alone a lifetime. In other words, advocating face of the Absurd, portraying it as an effective kind of coping mechanism.2 an impossible disposition toward the Absurd, such as omnipotence, the To what extent can humorism be a legitimate disposition toward the conjunction of opposites or everlasting euphoria, is considered illegitimate. Absurd? This paper purports to critically examine the status of what I call Second, if one holds absurdity to be an insuperable condition of human ‘Humoristic Absurdism’ (in other words: a disposition toward the Absurd 3 That is, humorism without a specific object such as the Absurd.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Life Worth Living
    A LIFE WORTH LIVING A LIFE WORTH LIVING Albert Camus and the Quest for Meaning robert zaretsky the belknap press of harvard university press Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, En gland 2013 Copyright © 2013 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College all rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Zaretsky, Robert, 1955– A life worth living : Albert Camus and the quest for meaning / Robert Zaretsky. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978- 0- 674- 72476- 1 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Camus, Albert, 1913– 1960. 2. Conduct of life. I. Title. B2430.C354Z37 2013 194—dc23 2013010473 CONTENTS Prologue 1 1. Absurdity 11 2. Silence 59 3. Mea sure 92 4. Fidelity 117 5. Revolt 148 Epilogue 185 Notes 199 A c k n o w l e d g m e n t s 2 2 1 Index 223 A LIFE WORTH LIVING PROLOGUE “Even my death will be contested. And yet what I desire most today is a quiet death, which would bring peace to those whom I love.”1 Albert Camus’ prediction, written in the last decade of his life, has been borne out, though perhaps not his hope. Over the past several years, contests have simmered and burst over the French Algerian writer’s legacy. Shortly after becoming France’s president, Nicolas Sarkozy made a state visit to Algeria. The visit garnered more than the usual attention, in part because Sarkozy had come to offi ce with a reputation as a bluntly spoken conservative who saw no reason for France to apologize for its role as a colonial power.
    [Show full text]
  • Number 30 a Stranger Again
    hamIsh hamIlToN preseNTs Five Dials Number 30 A Stranger Again The Camus Issue — CurTIs GIllespIe The Complicated Legacy Deborah levy The Death Drive alberT Camus Summer in Algiers . Plus: rotated, distorted, warped street art & Camus’s handwriting. CONTRIBUTORS alberT Camus was born in Mondovi, Algeria, in 1913. An avid sportsman, Camus claimed to have learned all he knew about morality and the obligations of men from football. He preferred to write whilst standing up and was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1957. While on a trip to the United States, Camus visited the New York Zoo twenty times. He was also the owner of a cat called Cigarette. CurTIs GIllespIe is the author of five books, including the memoirsAlmost There and Playing Through, and the novel Crown Shyness. Gillespie has won three National Magazine Awards in Canada for his writing on politics, science and the arts. In 2010 he co-founded the award-winning narrative journalism magazine Eighteen Bridges, which he also edits. Like Camus, he was a football goalkeeper. He played for the University of Alberta in the early eighties. Deborah levy is the author of many works, including, Billy & Girl, The Unloved and Swallowing Geography. In 2012 her novel Swimming Home was shortlisted for the Man Booker Prize. Having trained at Darlington College of Arts, she left to become a playwright, creating work for the Royal Shakespeare Company among others. Levy was a Fellow in Creative Arts at Trinity College, Cambridge. Her most recent essay, Things I Don’t Want to Know is a response to George Orwell’s Why I Write and her next novel, Hot Milk,will be published by Hamish Hamilton in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan Lendl Uy Sir Jay Flores Introduction to Philosophy of The
    Uy 1 Jan Lendl Uy Sir Jay Flores Introduction to Philosophy of the Human Person 1 April 2018 Comparative Philosophical Analysis on Man’s Existential Purpose: Camus vs. Marcel The purpose of man’s existence has been a topic of study and debate ever since the dawn of philosophy during the time of ancient Greece. This topic is quite broad and complex as the purpose of man differs in perspective. Throughout the course of many eras, philosophers continuously sought for the true essence of human existence. As of today, there is still no definite answer to this as we, humans, remain divided by our own beliefs. This divide roots back from the varying views of philosophers who expressed their own interpretation of man’s existence, backed up by thorough research and lifelong studies. Among many views, there are two particular philosophical perspectives which are prominent for their contrasting qualities: existentialism and absurdism. Existentialism proposes that the individual has free will, which means he has the capacity to create his own purpose in life. According to Jones College, the existentialist view illustrates that humans are thinking beings who are capable of living in independence. We shape our own lives. The individual is free to choose what to believe in and is solely responsible for every decision and action made. Existentialism puts forward the idea that man is an independent being who has the freedom to make its own interpretation of the purpose of existence. Uy 2 Leonora Cohen, in explains that, in the existentialist view, the world does not have an inherent meaning (2).
    [Show full text]
  • Rereading Joseph Heller?S Catch-22 from the Viewpoint of Existential
    Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi The Journal of International Social Research Cilt: 10 Sayı: 49 Volume: 10 Issue: 49 Nisan 2017 April 2017 www.sosyalarastirmalar.com Issn: 1307-9581 REREADING JOSEPH HELLER’S CATCH-22 FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF EXISTENTIAL PHILOSOPHY AND CAMUS’ ABSURDISM Mehmet Recep TAŞ * Abstract Published in 1961, Joseph Heller's Catch-22 came into prominence among important American novels of the twentieth century. It coined a new expression that connotes the illogical, inconsistent and irrational situations. It deals with the absurdities and unsolvable paradoxical policies of the state’s policymaking groups that drive the individuals into a meaningless, absurdist worldview. It is likely as well to assert that Catch-22 is a novel, which reflects and promote an existential worldview. However, this worldview is closer to Sartre’s standpoint than that of Camus’. Considering the novel, the existential philosophy of Sartre (which suggests that we're able to basically invent meanings of our own) and Camus’ absurdism (which suggests that the search for meaning is in itself both absurd and determined to fail, so; we should embrace the absurd and find happiness in it), this article aims to underline the importance of adopting the existential philosophy of Sartre for the individuals to cope with the sense of nihilism when confronted with the absurdities of today’s world policy making groups. Keywords: Catch-22, Absurdism, Camus, Existentialism, Sartre. INTRODUCTION In order to understand and evaluate a novel written decades before the time in which we live, contrary to New Critics who focus merely on the form dismissing the historical back ground of the work and the experiences by which the author has created the work, it is essential to have a look on social, political issues and the zeitgeist of the period.
    [Show full text]
  • Jean-Baptiste Clamence and the Literary Infection by Evil
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS LODZIENSIS Folia Litteraria Polonica 4(59) 2020 https://doi.org/10.18778/1505-9057.59.05 Maciej Kałuża* https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9654-7435 The woman had to fall? Jean-Baptiste Clamence and the literary infection by evil Summary The article presents the concept of evil, as developed in the literary as well as phil- osophical works of Albert Camus. After a short, preliminary notice on the rela- tionship between literature and evil, the article presents two spheres, in which the problem of evil was grasped by the author of The Rebel. In the main part of the ar- ticle, the complexity of the problem of evil, as represented by Jean-Baptiste Cla- mence from The Fall is shown. It is seen as a development of the concept of evil from The Plague, with the potency to disseminate onto others. It is also perceived, as something resulting from severe trauma of the main character. In conclusion, I claim, that the problem of evil, as experienced by Clamence may be understood as a still relevant metaphor of contemporary culture, struggling with passivity against the rise of social evil. Keywords: evil, literature and philosophy, Camus, The Fall1 * Dr, Pedagogical University of Cracow, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Social Philosophy Department, Podchorążych 2, 30-084 Cracow; e-mail: [email protected] © by the author, licensee Łódź University – Łódź University Press, Łódź, Poland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 82 Maciej Kałuża Introduction: On evil, guilt and literature Why would philosophers need literature in their contemplation of the problem of evil?1 In search of the possible roots of their interest in the literary vision of evil, we could perhaps reach back to the times where there were no distinct lines drawn, for example, ancient Greek philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • By Samuel Beckett Alumno
    UNIVERSIDAD DE JAÉN Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación Trabajo Fin de Grado DE LAS EDUCACIÓN LAS DE Theatre of the Absurd: “Waiting for Godot” by Samuel Beckett Alumno: Santiago Riaza Martínez Tutor: Juan Ráez Padilla Dpto: Filología Inglesa Febrero, 2016 FACULTAD DE HUMANIDADES Y CIENCIAS CIENCIAS Y HUMANIDADES DE FACULTAD E 0. Abstract In this essay, it is going to be analysed the enigmatic and eclectic play Waiting for ​ Godot by Samuel Beckett throughout a philosophical point of view. Some of these philosophies are related to existentialism, absurdism, hegelianism and religion. Besides, it is going to be explained the genre of this play: The Theatre of the Absurd, its historical background and the relationship between this play and contemporary cinema. The main purpose of this essay is giving some food for thought to its readers to face the problematic and mystery that surrounds this play. Keywords Absurdism, Samuel Beckett, Existentialism, Waiting for Godot, Theatre of the Absurd, Albert Camus, Religion, Drama, Cinema, Second War World, Esslin, Language, Postmodernism, Modernism, Ireland, Paris, Berlin, Jean Paul Sartre, Communication, Silence, Minimalism. 1 Contents Pages 0. Abstract and keywords 1 1. Introduction 3 2. Context 3­13 2.1. Biography 3­5 2.2. Literary Works 5­6 2.3. Historical context 6­7 2.4. The Theatre of the Absurd 7­8 2.5. Are the Theatre of the Absurd and the Existentialist Theatre the same genre? 8­9 2.6. The tradition of the Theatre of the Absurd 9­10 2.7. Is Waiting for Godot a modernist or a postmodernist play? 10­13 ​ ​ 3.
    [Show full text]
  • UGRD 2017 Spring Joskow Ariane.Pdf (714.5
    On the Art of Teaching Medicine Ariane Joskow with Dr. Laura DeLozier Classics Department 29 April 2017 Overview • Who was Galen? • What did he teach? • How did he teach it? • Lasting effects • Conclusions Who was Galen? • Galen of Pergamon • Born in c. 130 CE • Studied in Pergamum, then in Alexandria in Egypt • In 162 moved to Rome, quickly gained notoriety for his success. • Served as physician to Marcus Aurelius, Commodus, and Septimius Severus. • Died in c. 216 CE Illustration of Galen with predecessor Hippocrates on cover of 1677 medical text Lipsiae by Georgii Frommani (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland) What did Galen teach? • Built on the works of Hippocrates • Advocated medicine as a science above all – something to study and practice. • Advocated dissection as both a means of practicing surgery and understanding anatomy. • Taught and fully developed the field of humorism Humorism • Galen popularized the belief in the four humors • Symptoms manifest because of these imbalances • In treatment, opposites resolve imbalances (Kleisiaris 2014) • Every individual had a unique “correct” balance – peculiar only to them (Johnston Image from wikimedia commons 2016, p.2) (under public domain) Medicine as an Art • In all of Galen’s works he establishes medicine as a form of art. One need only look at the titles of so many of his works for reference. • Medicine was a “productive” art because “you can in fact show the result of the art when the practice of it stops. ” (Johnston 2016, p.21) • Considered to be practical and concrete - in the same vein as woodwork and painting, rather than in philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Existentialism
    TOPIC FOR- SEM- III ( PHIL-CC 10) CONTEMPORARY WESTERN PHILOSOPHY BY- DR. VIJETA SINGH ASSISTANT PROFESSOR P.G. DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY PATNA UNIVERSITY Existentialism Existentialism is a philosophy that emphasizes individual existence, freedom and choice. It is the view that humans define their own meaning in life, and try to make rational decisions despite existing in an irrational universe. This philosophical theory propounds that people are free agents who have control over their choices and actions. Existentialists believe that society should not restrict an individual's life or actions and that these restrictions inhibit free will and the development of that person's potential. History 1 Existentialism originated with the 19th Century philosopher Soren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche, but they did not use the term (existentialism) in their work. In the 1940s and 1950s, French existentialists such as Jean- Paul Sartre , Albert Camus and Simone de Beauvoir wrote scholarly and fictional works that popularized existential themes, such as dread, boredom, alienation, the absurd, freedom, commitment and nothingness. The first existentialist philosopher who adopted the term as a self-description was Sartre. Existentialism as a distinct philosophical and literary movement belongs to the 19th and 20th centuries, but elements of existentialism can be found in the thought (and life) of Socrates, in the Bible, and in the work of many pre-modern philosophers and writers. Noted Existentialists: Soren Kierkegaard (1813-1855) Nationality Denmark Friedrich Nietzsche(1844-1900) Nationality Germany Paul Tillich(1886-1965) Nati…United States, Germany Martin Heidegger ( 1889-1976) Nati…Germany Simone de Beauvior(1908-1986) Nati…France Albert Camus (1913-1960) Nati….France Jean Paul Sartre (1905-1980) Nati….France 2 What does it mean to exist ? To have reason.
    [Show full text]
  • John Dennis on Absurdism
    John Dennis On Absurdism Faculty Sponsors Dr. Kas Saghaf & Dr. Amit Sen 53 54 Abstract This project will seek to broaden and elucidate Camus’ concept of the absurd as presented in The Myth of Sisyphus, with the thesis being that, as given, it is too abstract and cursory to adequately rest on the conclusions that Camus has made. This task will be conducted in three main sections. The frst will focus on the initial descent and transition into absurdity by analyzing the phenomena and psychology within Franz Kafka’s The Metamorphosis. The second will focus on the nature of immediacy in absurd aesthetics and ethics, using Don Juan as the subject. The third will argue in defense of Sisyphus’ heroic status and elaborate more on the motions of revolt and happiness in a fate with little to no possibility. 55 Introduction Absurdism in Abstract Albert Camus begins his defnitive work, The Myth of Sisyphus, with these bold sentiments: “There is only one really serious philosophical question, and that is suicide. Deciding whether or not life is worth living is to answer the fundamental question in philosophy. All other questions follow from that” (Camus, p. 5). From this philosophical question arises the core subject of this project: philosophical absurdism. The basic formulation for absurdity provided in Sisyphus is when man’s natural insistence for meaning in life is confronted with an irrational universe that either has no answer or does not offer one. Predecessors of Camus had already tried to answer this dilemma, as Kierkegaard did with his “leap of faith” and phenomenologists like Husserl did in proposing that meaning could be established through phe- nomenological hermeneutics.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting Albert Camus
    The Tender Indifference of the World: Revisiting Albert Camus Marilyn MAESO In an innovative study that returns Albert Camus’ early works to their rightful place in the canon, Laurent Bove suggests we should view Camus as a philosopher of immanence and of acquiescence to the joy of the world. This reading is enlightening as far as Camus’ thoughts on history are concerned, but tends to gloss over the ruptures that run though his work, which is driven with multiple tensions. Reviewed: Laurent Bove, Albert Camus. De la transfiguration – Pour une expérimentation vitale de l’immanence, Publications de la Sorbonne, collection « La philosophie et l’œuvre », Paris, 2014. 168 p., €19. Critics often locate the starting point of Camus’ philosophy in his realisation of the meaninglessness of existence (according to this view, his first truly philosophical text is The Myth of Sisyphus, illustrated by its literary counterparts, Caligula and The Outsider). They view his concept of revolt as the exploration of an act of overcoming, of an escape from the Absurd which Camus claims can never be more than a threshold, a state in which nobody can ever remain for very long. This, supposedly, is Camus’ philosophy: a tragic fissure that forcefully turns back on itself, a divorce from the world that leads to a universal fraternity made manifest through revolt. According to this view, texts such as Betwixt and Between and Nuptials, which portray the luminous beauty of Algeria and the treasured places of childhood, cannot be read as anything more than literary essays in which the author is indulging in careless pleasure and contemplation, far below or beyond any philosophical thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Imagination in German Romanticism John Thomas Gill
    Wild Politics : Political Imagination in German Romanticism John Thomas Gill A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D in the Department of Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures in the College of Arts and Sciences. Chapel Hill 2020 Approved by: Gabriel Trop Eric Downing Stefani Engelstein Jakob Norberg Aleksandra Prica i © 2020 John Thomas Gill ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT John Gill: Wild Politics : Political Imagination in German Romanticism (Under the direction of Gabriel Trop) The political discourse of German Romanticism is often interpreted reductively: as either entirely revolutionary, reactionary, or indeed apolitical in nature. Breaking with this critical tradition, this dissertation offers a new conceptual framework for political Romanticism called wild politics . I argue that Romantic wild politics generates a sense of possibility that calls into question pragmatic forms of implementing sociopolitical change; it envisions imaginative alternatives to the status quo that exceed the purview of conventional political thinking. Three major fields of the Romantic political imaginary organize this reading: affect, nature, and religion. Chapter 1 examines Novalis’ politics of affect. In his theory of the fairy tale—as opposed to the actual fairy tales he writes—Novalis proposes a political paradigm centered on the aesthetic dimension of love. He imagines a new Prussian state constituted by emotional attachments between the citizen and the monarch. Chapter 2 takes up the “new mythology” in the works of F.W.J. Schelling, Friedrich Schlegel, and Johann Wilhelm Ritter, the comprehensive project of reorienting modern life towards its most transformative potentials.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fall, by Albert Camus
    The Fall, by Albert Camus In A Nutshell The Fall is the fictional, first person confession of Jean-Baptiste Clamence, a Parisian expatriate. Jean-Baptiste used to be a hotshot defense lawyer, but suddenly realized his life was hypocritical and now lives out his days in a seedy bar in Amsterdam. The novel puts you in the center of the action (not unlike those "Choose Your Own Adventure " books) because Jean-Baptiste talks to you while you’re sitting by him in said seedy bar. But The Fall is famous for more than its interesting narrative technique. For one, it was written by Albert Camus, a French thinker known for his philosophy of the absurd, a close cousin to existentialism, and his frenemy status with Jean-Paul Sartre, another French philosopher of the mid-1900s. (Note that throughout his life Camus maintained that he was not an existentialist.) Now, Camus is most famous for three big novels. The first is The Stranger, published in 1942, which tells the story of a detached, emotionless man convicted of murder, who finds existential freedom while in prison awaiting his death. The second is The Plague, in 1947, which revolves around an outbreak of the bubonic plague in an Algerian town, and the struggle of its citizens to deal with human suffering. And of course, the third is The Fall, in 1956, published shortly before Camus was awarded the 1957 Nobel Prize in Literature. Camus died only three years afterwards, making The Fall his final piece of fiction. Through these three novels, as well as his other works, Camus establishes and explores several ideas of his philosophy.
    [Show full text]