Arxiv:2011.03527V1 [Hep-Th] 12 Oct 2020 Uaino Eszmn W)Mdl1,Aconformal a of Model[1], Structure (WZ) Wess-Zumino of Mulation Does There and Partner

Home , Konrad Bleuler, Tetraquark

arXiv:2011.03527v1 [hep-th] 12 Oct 2020 uaino esZmn W)mdl1,aconformal a of model[1], structure (WZ) Wess-Zumino of mulation does there and partner. boson fermion a a of of exists state not consists ground model of i.e. the standard Similarly spectra the broken, bosons. corresponding are are have which is which always baryons mesons symmetry not of do the spectra fermions spectroscopy, nature, hadron In in fermions. lsa[0 eedrvdb tHot6.Instantons Hooft[6]. ’t by derived were Glashaw[10] eusv n w pnr anthv eodistance, zero conformal. are a fields have are the cannot spinors and spinors two Majorana and between The repulsive interaction defined. or are positive, 3] constant spinors[2, coupling Majorana for grangian r n td rpgto fsltn n2 in solitons of propagation solitons study consider and not ory do We 3 theory in hadrons. string possibil- describing and re- quarks, open of to be ity solitons discussed can dimensional 3 Higgs which Hooft as garded monopoles ‘t by magnetic transforming produced by 7]. superconductor 6, by field[4, confined are arnin r icse nteppr5.Magnetic paper[5]. the of in monopoles discussed are Lagrangians 9]. interactions[8, nonlinear by appear pcrsoisaedfidi ibr pc.I h for- the In space. Hilbert in defind are Spectroscopies and bosons between symmetry a is Supersymmetry antcmnplsaesltn n3 in solitons are monopoles Magnetic rcdrst epcnomlt yadn extra adding by conformality keep to Procedures D pc nti eiw u xli h tigthe- string the explain but review, this in space Frel)Gaut colo cec n niern,Tei Engineering, and Science of School Graduate (Formerly) srpeetdas by abo discuss also We represented astrophysics. is othe and physics summarize particle we in thema, theory central as collaborators their and hoywstidi h rmwr ftesrn theory. string the of framework the i gra in theory Einstein’s tried The of was incorporation formulation. theory which Dirac’s in of Maldacena of form dence front the or gauge, inwihi nailsaa eo htrmismassless. remains that corres meson scalar and axial (fermions) an baryons is which of pion spectroscopy obtaining in rdk n eTeaodfruae eaiitclgtfro light relativistic 5 formulated Téramond type Kaluza-Klein de and Brodsky nenlfrinpoaaoscnb eadda h partner the as regarded be 5 can compen propagators to fermion appears internal that ghost Faddeev-Popov the Lagrangian, uioadiflecdo h tigter r preseted. are su theory the string from the originates on which influenced Furlan, and and Zumino Fubini Alfaro, de of D α aigmteaia rmwrso raigtesupersymme the treating of frameworks mathematical Taking nteLHC,tetm parameter time the LFHQCD, the In uiiadRbnvc omltdsprofra unu m quantum superconformal formulated Rabinovici and Fubini h tnadmdlo arndnmc sbsdo ag theor gauge on based is dynamics hadron of model standard The noeve fhdo pcrsoyotie rma extensi an from obtained spectroscopy hadron of overview An ( SU x ag theory. gauge .INTRODUCTION I. tposition at ) (2) g nLgaga a hsnt be to chosen was Lagrangian in × U 1 ag ru fGeorge- of group gauge (1) uesmer nHdo pcrsoyand Spectroscopy Hadron in Supersymmetry oiosi iesoa emoi Media Fermionic Dimensional 2 in Solitons x D τ n metrics and nid itr(d)sae sn ia’ ih oegue a gauge, cone light Dirac’s using space, (AdS) Sitter de anti = t ± z/c D D ( , pc,which space, z Dtd oebr9 2020) 9, November (Dated: η pc that space µν ∈ uequaternion pure τ fLa- of aaaaFurui Sadataka = t ± z/c ( , oooesltosaegvni 1–5 sexamples. as of [13–15] Reviews in given Polyakov[12]. are by solutions solution monopole monopole a tain r 5 smooth of a ball of existence an proved Donaldson[16] topology, 3 in [ e yd lao uiiadFra dF)2] They (dAFF)[20]. operator Furlan Hailtonian and the Fubini defined Alfaro, sys- de dimensional by time tem 1 quantum 1-dimension, conformal space time to of 1 mechanics applied 3-dimension, was space system in WZ dimensional by defined bosons and to refer please For surface, Riemann theory. [17]. on Rohlin’s summarized groups is extended homotopy theory Donaldson whose and Rohlin, in[67], by studied ically n ofra generator conformal and xdt h light-cone the to fixed ndF,4cmoet fguevector gauge of components 4 dAFF, In pc steslto fEnti edeuto,whose equation, field Einstein of solution Sitter the de is [21]. Rabinovici space and Fubini by formulated was 19]. 18, dual[11, F ,K H, ′ z µν th − na plcto fgueter ofu dimensional four to theory gauge of application an In h ue ag rnfrainta ik fermions links that transformation gauge super The uecnomlqatmmcaisi eSte space Sitter de in mechanics quantum Superconformal ∈ H D oooygopo n-sphere of group homotopy C satisfies ). = ] t2dmninlsltn hs dynamics whose solitons dimensional 2 ut iyter nMxelselectromagnetic Maxwell’s in theory vity per ytecoc ftelight-cone the of choice the by appears ) uesmercapoce iestring like approaches supersymmetric r y nvriy [email protected] University; kyo o-bla ag hoywsfudt con- to found was theory gauge non-abelian D odn eos(oos,ecp the except (bosons), mesons ponding fafrin oado omltda formulated Donaldson fermion. a of netnino d/F correspo- AdS/CFT of extension an s eguetasomto fWs and Wess of transformation pergauge thlgahcQD(FQD in (LFHQCD) QCD holographic nt − aeupyia ere ffedmin freedom of degrees unphysical sate ihol nt ubro iglrte.The singularities. of number finite only with √ no uecnomlfil theory field superconformal of on .I h iesoa (4 dimensional 4 the In y. r yBosy itn Connes Witten, Brodsky, by try − caisi eSte pc,and space, Sitter de in echanics F 1 µν − H, [ = ,D K, − A = ] ∗ + K F µν htsatisfy that , − ,adat-efulfield anti-selfdual and 0, = − where , √ dsucceeded nd H − π iaingenerator dilation , 1 r K, D ( S QCD ) [ n ,K H, ∗ a systemat- was ) en Hodge means A 2 = ] m sgauge is √ − 1 D D. 2 coordinates satisfy A Phonon can be regarded as a soliton which is a boson that propagates in fermionic media. It does not have 4 3 supersymmetric partner, but its propagation depends (xi)2 (x0)2 = R2 = − Gλ on even or odd numbers of fermions that it interacts. i=1 X In the following subsections, WZ model, dAFF model, Witten’s model, anti self-dual Yang Mills model, Pen- where λ is a cosmological constant[23]. rose’s model, dynamical models using quaternions are Maldacena[22] conjectured that our 4 dimensional reviewed as a preparation of hadron spectroscopy in 5D world can be represented by the conformal field the- projective spaces and soliton dynamics in 2D projective ory (CFT) projected on the boundary of 4 + 1 di- quaternion space, both related to the supersymmetry. mensional anti de Sitter (AdS) space, and called the principle as AdS/CFT correspondence. Superconformal quantum mechanics in AdS space was formulated by de A. Wess-Zumino Model and supergauge Téramond, Brodsky and their collaborators using 5D transformation holographic mapping of physical space to AdS space. For the review [77] is helpful. They considered light cone gauge, and the light front holographic QCD, the Wess and Zumino [1] defined supergauge transforma- Dirac’s relativistic treatment[34]. tion in four dimension as gauge transformation whose When one extends the metrics of the Hilbert space commutators turns out to be a combination of a confor- from 4D Minkowsky space to 5D ADS space, and mal transformation and a γ5 transformation. assumes the holographic principle, one can show Consider Majorana spinors α(x) that satisfy relations between baryon spectroscopies and meson 1 λ α1 spectroscopies[24], although the mass of lightest meson (γµ∂ν + γν ∂µ ηµν γ ∂λ) =0, (1) − 2 α2 pion remains massless. A Higgs boson in the standard model, whose super- where symmetric partner which is called higgsino is not observed experimentally. However, Higgs boson interacts 0 0 I k 0 σk γ = γ0 = , γ = γk = − , (2) with fermions and cause them to be massive, and it I 0 − σk 0 decays into two photons, vector boson pairs and b¯b pairs[25, 26]. Decay modes of a heavior Higgs boson where k =1, 2, 3 and is also proposed[27]. γµ,γν = γµγν + γν γµ =2gµν I, Dirac [28] stated that in use of mathematics of trans- { } formations of relativity and quantum mechanics, there I 0 γ5 = iγ0γ1γ2γ3 = γ = , are two ways, i) symbolic methods that deals with in- 5 0 I − variants and ii) the methods of coordinates or represen- 0 1 0 √ 1 tations that deals with numbers corresponding to these σ1 = , σ2 = − − , 1 0 √ 1 0 quantities, expressed by real R numbers. He has estab- − lished quantum electrodynamics (QED) based on the 1 0 σ3 = . (3) first method using a complex number C defining the 0 1 − U(1) gauge transformation as an aid to practical calculations. The infinitesimal parameters ξµ satisfy Extension of standard model in R1,1 R3 space-time × 1 λ in the framework of noncommutative geometry was pro- ∂µξν + ∂ν ξµ = ηµν γ ∂λ. (4) posed by Connes and his collaborators. Noncommuta- 2 tive geometry is based on K-theory in which real num- Then it follows that bers, complex numbers and quaternions play their roles. Supersymmetry plays a role in fluctuation of ξµ =2√ 1¯α1γµα2, (5) fermionic systems (instantons) near the ground state via − occurlence of bosonic soliton waves. When the algebra and by multiplying γµ to (2), one obtains (R) is one dimensional vector space normal to a 2- ∧ 1 dimensional plane in hysteretic solids, a similar analysis ∂ α = γ γλ∂ α. (6) of spectroscopy of sound wave (phonon) is possible by µ 4 µ λ projecting dynamics to 2 dimensional projected quaternion space, and by taking the time parameter τ = t z/v It was shown that α can be expressed in the form ± where v is the sound velocity in a material. (0) (1) Hysteretic effects in phonon systems and instanton α1 µ α1 α = (0) + γµx (1) , (7) effects are compared via the holonomy theory. α2 ! α2 ! 3 and C. Witten’s model and Fubini-Rabinovici model in de Sitter space ξ = c + ω xν + ǫx + a x2 2x α x. (8) µ µ µν µ µ − µ · The metric tensor becomes In nature supersymmetry is broken, and constraints on supersymmetry breaking in the Yang-Mills field [33] η =4√ 1(¯α(1)γ α(0) α¯(1)γ α(0)), (9) − 1 5 2 − 2 5 1 was discussed by Witten[36, 37]. In zero momentum which mixesαψ ¯ and αγ ψ. space, supersymmetry charge Q1, ,Qk are chosen to 5 ··· The supergauge transformation was applied to spin satisfy ¯ ¯ systems with superfield φ(t, θ, θ) where θ, θ are totally 2 2 2 anti-commuting quanities and t R by Nicolai [32], Q1 = Q2 = = Qk = H, ∈ ··· QiQj + Qj Qi =0, for i = j. (16) φ(t, θ, θ¯)= A(t)+ θψ(t)+ ψ¯(t)θ¯ + θθF¯ (t), (10) 6 Bosonic states are defined by where A is a fermionic function that satisfies A∗ = A, ψj ψk, ψiψj ψk etc. are fermi fields, F (t) is a bosonic exp(2π√ 1Jz) b = b (17) function that satisfies F ∗ = F . Similar model was con- − | i | i structed also by Polyakov[13]. and fermionic states are defined by The Hamiltonian H = Q,Q† where Q = { ¯} j G nˆ aj∗ψj+lnˆ , Q† = j G nˆ ψj+lnˆ aj , where G exp(2π√ 1Jz) f = f , (18) are∈ lattice points andn ˆ are unit∈ vectors at lattice points. − | i −| i P P P P ¯ The function of superfields φ(t, θ, θ), satisfies where Jz is a rotation operator, and the operator

d F [H, φ]= √ 1 φ. (11) ( 1) = exp(2π√ 1Jz) (19) − dt − −

A review of super gauge transformation is also given distinguishes fermions with half integer Jz and bosons by Green et al [18, 19]. with integer Jz. For a particle moving in one dimension, he considered supersymmetric charge 1 B. de Alfaro-Fubini-Furlan model Q = (σ p + σ W (x)), 1 2 1 2 1 de Alfaro, Fubini and Furlan (dAFF)[20] studied a Q2 = (σ1p σ2W (x)), (20) ﬁeld theory in one over-all time dimension, invariant 2 − under the full conformal group, whose Lagrangian of a where W (x) is an arbitraly function. physical operator Q(t) with a coupling constant g > 0 E=0 The number of zero energy states of bosons nB and is given by E=0 that of fermions nF have the relation 1 2 g L = (Q˙ ). (12) F E=0 E=0 2 T r( 1) = n n , 2 − Q − B − F 1 2 E=0 E=0 They considered fundamental operators: 1) H = 2 p + and when nB nF = 0, there are two possibili- g E=0 −E=0 Q2 , corresponding to hamiltonian[34, 35], 2) D corre- ties, 1) nB = nF = 0, supersymetry is broken, 2) E=0 E=0 sponding to dilatation operation, and 3) K correspond- nB = nF are equal but non zero, supersymmetry is ing to conformal transformation. They constructed unbroken. E=0 E=0 O(2, 1) conformal group of non-compact rotations When nB nF = 0, supersymmetry is not spon- taneously broken.− Spontaneous6 symmetry breaking oc- 1 1 1 1 R = ( K + aH), S = ( K aH), (13) curs in the Higgs mechanism. 2 a 2 a − Fubini and Rabinovici [21] extended the operator Q(t) where a is a constant with dimension of length. Al- as though the lowest eigenstate H is not normalizable due D to infrared divergence, eigenstates of R are meaningful. dW Q = ψ+( √ 1p + ), Combinations α − − α dx α=1 α X D G = uH + vD + wK (14) dW Q+ = ψ(√ 1p + ), (21) satisﬁes the evolution equation − α dx α=1 α X ∂G = √ 1[H, G]=0, (15) where W (x) is the superpotential and pα = ∂t − √ 1(∂/∂xα). The = 1 supersymmetry was ex- and rotations become compact when ∆ = v2 4uw> 0. tended− − to = 2 de SitterN supersymmetry. − N 4

The algebra of dAFF[20] was extended by defining For GL(2, R) valued functions Ax, Ay which depend on (x, y), one defines a two component vector v, which sat- G = uH + vD + wK, ∆= v2 4uw < 0, − isfies and incorpolating Witten’s algebra Dxv = ∂xv + Axv =0,Dyv = ∂yv + Ayv =0, (27) 1 Q,Q+ = H, Q,Q = Q+,Q+ =0. 2{ } { } { } and

Here ∂y∂xv ∂x∂yv = ∂y(Axv)+ ∂x(Ayv) − − dW dW = (∂xAy ∂yAx + [Ax, Ay])v =0. Q = ψ+( √ 1p + ),Q+ = ψ(√ 1p + ) − − − dx − dx The above equation is equivalent to 1 2 and super potential W (x) = 2 f log x . An extension to spacially many dimensions and system with num- Fxy = [Dx,Dy]=0 (28) ber of fermions and bosons doubled = 2 and tran- When one considers with a complex projective parame- sitions from strongly coupled vacuumN to weakly cou- ter λ CP1, pled monopole condensates following the works of Bo- ∈ gomol’nyi [55], Prasad and Sommerﬁeld [54] were pre- L = Dz¯ λDw,M = Dw¯ λDz, (29) sented by Seiberg and Witten[40]. − − ASDYM becomes

2 D. Anti self-dual Yang-Mills (ASDYM) field [L,M]= Fz¯w¯ λ(Fww¯ Fzz¯)+ λ Fwz =0. (30) model − − The Lax pair equations for GL(n, C) valued functions In the anti self-dual Yang-Mills (ASDYM) equation Ψ(w, z, w,˜ z,˜ λ), where w, z, w,˜ z˜ R, λ C, satisfy ∈ ∈ framework[52, 53] based on the twistor theory [59, 60, L Ψ = (D + D λ(D +Φ))Ψ = 0, 62], one can construct integrable SU(2) chiral model, 0 y t − x including the Higgs field Φ[63–65] and a vector field A L1Ψ = (Dx Φ λ(Dt Dy))Ψ = 0, (31) − − − Φ and Φ=ˆ , Φ µ µ | | Ψ(x , λ¯)∗Ψ(x , λ)=1. (32) Aa = ǫabc∂ Φˆ bΦˆ c + k Φˆ a, (22) i − i i The function Ψ can be chosen to satisfy gauge transfor some vector ki. The magnetic field is Bk = 3 1 a ˆ a formations J : R U(n) such that 2 ǫijkFij Φ . → In Minkowski space defined by ds2 = dt2+dx2+dy2, 1 1 1 1 − A = A = J − (J + J ), A = Φ= J − J , the Lagrangian density t y 2 t y x − 2 x (33) 1 µν µ = T r(Fµν F ) T r(DµΦD Φ), and the equation (33) becomes L 2 − a a a b c F = ∂ A ∂A ǫ A A 1 1 1 1 1 ij i j − i − abc i j (J − Jt)t (J − Jx)x (J − Jy)y [J − Jt,J − Jy]=0. abc b c pqr p q a − − − =2ǫ ∂iΦˆ ∂j Φˆ (ǫ ∂iΦˆ ∂j Φˆ )Φˆ , (34) − The last term is called the Wess-Zumino-Witten D Φ= F ,D Φ= F ,D Φ= F . (23) x yt y tx t yx (WZW) term. The Lax pair have soliton solutions[61]. Solutions of the equation 1 ∂ K ∂ K = η ∂ Kρ (24) E. Twistors and conformal model µ ν − ν µ 4 µν ρ is called Killing vectors and one parametrizes K = ∂/∂τ In order to combine the electro magnetic force de- and transform real coordinates (t,x,y,τ) to scribed by Maxwell equation and the gravity described by Einstein equation, Penrose proposed a twistor x τ x + τ t + y t y 3 z = − , z˜ = , w = , w˜ = − . method[53, 62] using a function f of R R √2 √2 √2 √2 → (25) v(x,y,ζ,t)= Using the Hodge operator on R2,1, the Lax pair equa- 1 tion can be written as ∗ f( (x + √ 1y)+ λ(t ζ), 2π√ 1 Γ CP1 − − − − I ⊂ DΦ= F. (26) (t + ζ)+ λ( x + √ 1y), λ)dλ ∗ − − 5

The integral is along a curve on a manifold CP1, The quaternions H has orthogonal bases of the Hlib- which is the quotient of C2 C2 by the equivalence ert space consisting of eigen eiements I, i, j, k which sat- relation × isfy

(Z0, Z1) (cZ0,cZ1) (35) ij = ji = k, jk = kj = i, ki = ik = j (39) ∼ − − − for c C, and λ = Z1/Z0, λ¯ =1/λ. In the SL(2, C) representation Mapping∈ between local coordinate between S2 and CP1 is given by[53] H = aI + bi + cj + dk a + √ 1d c + √ 1b = − − − , (40) (u1,u2,u3) 1 u3,u1 + √ 1u2 , (36) c + √ 1b a √ 1d →{ − − } − − − 2 and by patching two S , one obtains the Riemann where a,b,c,d R and H∗ = aI bi cj dk. 3 ∈ − − − sphere S . Topology of manifolds on which functions of these On the manifold S3 S1, a Lie group GL(2, C) op- numbers are deﬁned turned out to be important to un- × erates [56]. derstanding physical phenomena[29, 30].

3 F. Dynamics on S manifold and quaternions H G. Supersymmetry in soliton-fermion interactions

In quantum chromo dynamics (QCD), there is axial Witten’s formulation of supersymmetry was applied gauge transformation U(1)A, whose symmetry is spon- to non-linear σ model and the effect of instantons in fer- taneously broken. For practical calculations, numbers romagnetic and anti-ferromagnetic materials were stud- other than complex numbers could be useful. In 1877, ied. A good review on supersymmetry in particle Frobenius showed that there are only three isomorphi- physics and introduction to the super gauge transfor- cally distinct real finite dimensional associative divi- mation of Wess and Zumino[1] are written in the book sion algebra R, C and quaternion H. Quaternions have of Labelle [3]. bases Electrons in 2D strong magnetic field show Quantum 1 0 0 √ 1 Hall Effects (QHE). In calculation of conductivity ten- I = , i = − 0 1 √ 1 0 sors σxy and density of states, supersymmetric analyses − was performed. Supersymmetry in disorder and chaos 0 1 √ 1 0 j = , k = . (37) is discussed in [94]. 1 0 0− √ 1 − − − In fermionic materials, non-linear interactions sometimes induce solitons which are observed as phonons. Real quaternion fields, which preserve time-reversal Phonons are bosons but do not have supersymmetric symmetry was extensively studied in [102]. The authors partners. In 1 dimensional antiferromagnetic Heisen- defined time in real algebra ( ) and quaternion algebra berg chains, Haldane[91] showed that spectroscopy of ( ). In , time reversal correspondsR to u u¯, while in Q R 1 → solitons in integer spin system and in half-integer spin , σ(u)= Q u¯ Q− , where Q · · system are distinguished. In order to study these physical processes, usual 0 1 methods is to define state space of fermions and bosons 1− 0 | |  | |  using 2nd quantization [31]. State space of bosons is described by −−−−. −−−−  ..  Q =   (38)  | |  ∞  ..  n  .  B = B (41)  | |  H ⊕H   n=0  −−−− −−−−  X  0 1   | | −  and vectors in the space is described by creation opera-  1 0   | |  tors a∗(xi) as is the symplectic matrix[203, 204]. The symplectic group Sp(n, R) is isomorphic to GL(2n, C). 1 n Φ(a∗)= Kn(x1. , xn)a∗(x1) a∗(xn)d x, For ǫ , the unit matrix of degree n, let matrix J be (n!)1/2 ··· ··· n n Z 0 ǫ X J = n , matrices σ that satisfy tσJσ = J are (42) ǫn 0 where K (x , , x ) are symmetric functions. The an- − n 1 ··· n Sp(n, C) matrices. nihilation operator a(xj ) is complex conjugate of a∗(xi). 6

State space of fermions is described by is similar method[34]. In this framework and ‘t Hooft renor- HF to Φ(a∗), but creation operator and annihilation opera- malization gauge[4, 5], they extended the Glashow- tor are generators of Grassmann algebra Weinberg-Salam model of electroweak interaction without including ghosts that appear in loop calculations. a(x),a(x′) = a(x),a∗(x′) = a∗(x),a′(x) =0. In LF-form, the vacuum state is trivial up to possible { } { } { } (43) k+ = k0 + kz = 0 zero mode, in contrast to the Higgs Vectors in the space is expressed as zero-mode in instant-form. To include gravitation field in the standard model, 1 n1 n2 Bousso conjectured that local field theory fails and holo- Φn1,n2, ,nk , = 1/2 (a1∗) (a2∗) . (44) ··· ··· (n1!n2! ) ··· graphic principle, i.e. restricting number of fundamen- ··· tal degrees of freedom in 4D space-time is related to the The symmetry between fermions which have a half- area of surface in 5D anti de Sitter space (AdS) should integer spin quantum number s and an integer angular be utilized[104]. The gauge/string duality in low energy momentum number L forming a half-integer total spin hadron study is discussed in[72, 105]. quantum number J, and bosons which have an integer AdS space is the maximally symmetric space- s and an integer L forming an integer J quantum num- timewith negative scalar curvature. AdSd+1 space is bers is the supersymmetry. Berezin[31] treated bosons defined by a surface and fermions in Hilbert space not using complex numbers, but generators of n dimensional Grassmann al- 2 2 2 2 2 X 1 + X0 X1 Xd = R (47) gebra. With each Grassmann algebra, there is closely − − −···− connected 2n dimensional Clifford algebra, whose op- and the metric of distance 1 erators Pi = √ 1 [ˆxk (∂/∂xk)], Qi =x ˆk + (∂/∂xk) − − ds2 = dX2 + dX2 dX2 dX2. (48) satisfy 0 − 1 −···− d

The plane X 1 = Xd splits the AdSd+1 into two regions Pi,Qj =0, Pi, Pj = Qi,Qj =2δij . (45) { } { } { } defined by light− cone coordinates The mapping from R1,1 H given by → 1 1 u = 2 (X 1 Xd), v = 2 (X 1 + Xd). (49) x1 R − − R − [(x1e1 + x2e2)= ] x2 The correspodence between 10-dimensional super 0 x1 + x2 gravity and super Yang-Mills equations on the bound- [x1i + x2j = − ] (46) → x1 + x2 0 ary, which is conformal field theory (CFT) was called AdS/CFT correspondence[22, 23]. is a Clifford algebra. de Téramond et al.[24, 74] extended the LF quanti- An aim of this presentation is to show that the super zation in the LC gauge based on the method of [20] to 1,1 group R plays the common role in supersymmetric the light front space-time with holographic embedding, studies of elementary particles and in solitons. by using holographic coordinates The structure of this presentation is as follows. In sec- 2 tion 2, we discuss supersymmetry in hadron dynamics. z = R /(X 1 Xd). (50) In section 3, supersymmetry in low dimensional spin sys- − − tems is discussed. A bosonic excitation in fermionic sys- In their formulation, the spectrum of squared mass tems sometimes appear as solitons. Symmetry in prop- M 2 of mesons and baryons show a similarity. In [75], su- agation of solitary waves in 2D media is discussed in perconformal quantum mechanics of [21] applied to the section 4. In section 5, we present discussion on future fermionic light-front bound state equations was shown research and conclusion. to be dual to the bosonic AdS5. The LF wave function is Ψ(xi, k i, λi) where ⊥ x = k+/P + = (k0 + kz)/(P 0 + P z) (51) II. SUPERSYMMETRY IN HADRON i |i |i DYNAMICS is the LC fraction of a quark, k i are the transverse momenta, and λ are spin projections.⊥ Metric of AdS is A. Light front holographic QCD in anti de Sitter i space 2 2 R + 2 2 ds = (dx dx− dx dz ), (52) z2 − ⊥ − To construct renormalizable standard model of Quan- 0 3 tum Chromo Dynamics (QCD)[66], Srivastava and where x± = x x and z is the holographic variable. Brodsky [68, 69] proposed light-front (LF) quantiza- Bousso[104] and± Susskind and Lindesay[23] explain tion in the light-cone (LC) gauge, using the Dirac utility of holographic principles in AdS space. 7

+ The correspondence between the LF holographic and specify spaces with u,v > 0 as AdSd+1, and define QCD (LFHQCD) and supersymmetric quantum mecha- a group Z generated by nism is called AdS/QCD correspondense. Since the lon- 1 gitudinal mode is separated from the transverse modes u λ− u, v λv, xi xi, + → → → and the parameter of evolution is taken to be τ = x = with λ a fixed real number. The quotient AdS+ /Z is t + z/c[70, 71, 76]. Using the LF time evolution opera- d+1 0 z + 0 z defined as X1. Choosing 1 v λ, with v = 1 and tor P − = P P = d/dτ, and P = P + P , the LF v = λ identified. X is topologically≤ ≤ R4 S1 − k 1 hamiltonian that operates on Ψ(xi, i, λi) is given by At infinity of X × [79, 80, 103], ⊥ 1 d + ~ 2 2 HLF = P P − P u v xi =0 − ⊥ 2 2 i=1 k + m X = ⊥ + Ueff (x, k ). (53) x(1 x) ⊥ and u, v and x can be regarded as homogeneous coor- − i dinates, and set As mentioned by Srivastava and Brodsky[68, 69], Faddeev-Popov[50] or Gupta-Bleuler[51] ghost terms d 2 are absent in the LCHQCD, and the mass scale of xi =1. hadrons given by i=1 X 1 d 1 k 2 k The boundary of X1 is a copy of M = S S − . Bound- HLF Ψ(x, , λ) = Ψ(x, , λ) (54) 1 d ×1 | ⊥ i M | ⊥ i ary conformal field theory on S S − is to be compared with that of X = S1 Rd.× are defined by a parameter in Ueff (x, k ). 1 × In the LFHQCD approach, Brodsky⊥ and de In the AdS/CFT correspondence of Maldacena, Eu- Téramond found low energy hadron spectrum of the cledian metric 2 Regge behavior n + L[70]. The behavior is ˜ 2 ˜ 2 ˜ 2 ˜ 2 2 M ∼ X 1 X0 + X1 + + Xd = R not identical to the Regge behavior of open strings − − − ··· − 2 n α(0) −α′ [18, 19]. Needs of better understandings and ofM chiral∼ symmetry breaking and confinement as pointed U = X˜ 1 + X˜d, out by t’Hooft[7] were discussed. Waves of relativistic − dynamics can be expressed in the instant form, the front x2u R2 V = X˜ 1 X˜d = + , form and the point form [24, 34, 71]. The front form is − − R2 u the wave surface expressed by u0 u3/c = 0. X˜ R − x = α , α =0, 1, , d 1 (56) When a (1+2)D front form wave function is expressed α U ··· − by quaternions q = 0, equivalent quaternions that sat- 6 was defined. isfy q1q = qq2 have the periodicity in τ direction by 2lmn/c. When phonons have effective mass due to scattering in media, the wave front in instatnt form changes B. Tetraquark states or colour singlet quark pair to the point form. states In LFHQCD, the Lagrangian in AdSd+1 space with AdS radius R, and a dilaton background φ, yields the effective action Negative chilarity component of quark in a meson which yield negative chirality leptons, could produce ′ ′ d φ(x) N1N1 NJ N negative chilalrity component of quarks in baryons. In Seff = d xdz√ge g g J ··· LFHQCD, a fermion operator Rλ† that connects qq¯ Z ′ MM ∗ ′ ′ mesons to qqq baryons can create tetra quark qqq¯q¯ (g DM ΦN1, N DM′ ΦN1 N × ··· J ··· J states[77]. 2 ′ ′ µeff (z)ΦN1 NJ ΦN1 N ), (55) − ··· ··· J When qqq¯q¯ states dominate over qqq¯ q¯ states is an d+1 interesting problem for the study of supersymmetry. where √g = (R/z) is the conformal scale, and DM Brodsky et al[77] emphasized that the supersymmetric is the covariant derivative which includes the affine con- features of hadron physics derived from superconformal nection. quantum mechanics refers to the symmetry properties Witten[41] considered AdSd+1 space in Kaluza-Klein 1 d 1 of bound state wave functions of hadrons and not to spacetime and in manifold M = S S − . AdS is × d+1 quantum fields. Similar argument based on ontological described as quantum mechanics was proposed also by ‘t Hooft[82]. d Recently the CMS collaboration at LHC announced + + 2 detection of Υ(1S)Υ(1S) µ µ−µ µ− in proton- uv xi =1 → i=1 proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV [83]. X 8

PC 2m+1 2m+1 Υ(1S), Υ(2S), Υ(3S) are b¯b bosons of J = 1−− defines a S sphere. The mapping ψ : S Pm, and have mass 9.460 GeV, 10,023 GeV and 10.355 GeV, whose inverse image of each point is a circle is→ called PC 2m+1 respectively. There is also Υ(1D) of J = 2−−, but Hopf fibering of S . + its decay to µ µ− is not detected. Let Γ be the discontinuous group generated by 2m The 4 µ decay modes seems to be dominated via translations of Cm. Then Cm/Γ is called the complex Υ(1S)Υ(1S) resonances and sum of single parton scat- torus. tering (SPS) and double parton scatterng (DPS) fits the Let ∆ be the discontinuous group generated by zk k → experimental data quite well, and tetraquark contribu- 2z , (1 k m). The quotient manifold (Cm 0)/∆ tion seems to be small, although there are uncertainty is called≤ the≤ Hopf manifold. It is homeomorphic− to S1 2m 1 × in the quark spin polariztion of Υ(1S). S − . When the b quark is replaced by c quark, cc¯ makes The Dirac matrices, which are familiar to physicists PC J/ψ of J =1−−, and J/ψ(1S),J/ψ(2S) have masses represent Clifford algebra 3,1 which is a subalgebra 3.097 GeV and 3.686 GeV, respectively. cc¯ contribu- of M (C). The algebraA is isomorphic to A3,2 ∼ 4 A3,1 tion to the proton electromagnetic form factor were M2(H), where H is the quaternion field[130]. Spinor calculated using lattice data and ss¯ contribution was structures and Clifford modules were studied in [108] discussed[84]. Similar analysis will become possible if and conformal transformations of Dirac spinors were b¯b amplitudes are similar to those of cc¯. used in [1], and relations to complex Grassmannian are Concerning J/ψJ/ψ, ΥΥ and J/ψΥ productions, explained in [31]. there is a proposal of single and double quarkonium pro- In an article of Connes et al[122], an extension of non- ductions in the colour-evapolation model[85], which is commutative geometry formalism to unify gravity and an extension of a model for J/ψJ/ψ production[86]. The the supersymmetric standard model[121] in Einstein- colour evapolation model (CSM) assumes direct produc- Hilbert space was discussed. He defined spectral triple tion of vector quarkonium from gluons. ( , ,D), where is the algebra generated by R, C In the case of production of J/ψJ/ψ, the cross sec- andA HH, is the HilbertA space and D is a self-adjoint H tion per quarkonium transvers momentum dσ/dPT in operator. perturbative QCD was found to be larger than that By a proper choice of foliation F in the space V = Rn of J/ψ + ηc + g including QCD coupling conststants of noncommutative algebra, longitudinal components 5 αs(mq) . Experiments at LHC indicate that NLO could be eliminated from effective cohomology, and ex- 4 5 α(mq ) and NNLO αs(mq) were found to be larger tract transverse components in the Hilbert space, and than the leading order (LO)[87]. ghosts were not required for construction of consistent The calculated cross sectiion of ΥΥ production in gauge theory [120]. CSM turned out to be smaller than that obtained by Supersymmetric field theory on noncommutative ge- the sum of SPS and DPS evaluated by the CMS collab- ometry is based on the supergroup R1,1. The Hopf al- oration. There remain problems on tetra quark models gebra H of smooth functions on the R1,1 is given as and quark pair models. 1,1 H = C∞(R )= C∞(R) (R) (59) ⊗ ∧ C. Noncommutative geometry approach where (R) is the exterior algebra of one-dimensional vector∧ space. Every element of H can be expressed as f + gθ , where f,g C (R) and θ2 = 0. Thus super- Connes and Lott[118] proposed a quantum field the- 1 ∞ 1 symmetry becomes∈ manifest in H. In terms of Grass- ory of Yang-Mills type equations[33], by adopting a mann variables θ = (θ ,θ ), F (θ ) = c + c θ has the gauge fixing excluding ghost fields, based on noncom- 1 2 1 0 1 1 similar structure as H. mutative geometry[119, 120]. Jaffe et al [115–117] extended the = 2 super- We define the complex projective space P by taking m symmetric Wess-Zumino quantum fieldsN adopted by C 0, where C is (m + 1)-tuples (z ,z , ,z ) m+1 m+1 0 1 m Witten[38], using an extension of Connes’ triple as spec- and 0− is the point (0, , 0)[129]. A natural projection··· ··· tral quadruple ( , , Γ,Q) where Γ is Z2 grading of ψ : C 0 P (57) and Q is the DiracA H operator, A m+1 − → m and inverse image of each point is C∗ = C1 0. In 1 − i 0 Q ψ− (Ui) where Ui is an open neighbourhood of z we Q = − , (60) h h i i Q+ 0 use coordinates iζ = z /z , (0 h m,h = i), and z . 1 ≤ ≤ 6 To a point p Pm, ψ− (p) are called its homogeneous where Q operates on and Q operates re- ∈ + + coordinates. versally. − H− → H The equation The Hamiltonian H = Q2 is m k k Q Q 0 z z¯ = 1 (58) H = +∗ + , (61) k=0 0 Q∗ Q X − − 9

βH tW tW tW tW and considered the heat kernel e− (β > 0), state one deﬁnes dt = e− de , dt∗ = e d∗e− that sat- tH tH vectors a(t) = e− ae and cochains (A) consisting isfy C of (f0,f1,f2, ). Grading of Γ allows decompositions ··· 2 2 of (A) d =0, d∗ =0, dtd∗ + d∗dt =2H. (69) C t t t t (A)= e( ) o( ), (62) The group of Y is graded and additive quantum number C C A ⊕C A U is -1 for χ and +1 for ψ. e o where (f0,f2,f4, ) (A) , (f1,f3,f5, ) (A) , In order to obtain a relativistic version, one works on and ··· ∈ C ··· ∈ C space Y and time R1, and in the space Y R1 name × the supersymmetric generator dt as Q. One tries the e 1+Γ e 1 Γ e e e Lagrangian (A) = (A) + − (A) = (A)+ + (A) . C 2 C 2 C C C − (63) 1 αβ α αβ They showed that the coboundary operator ∂ exists = dxT r[ Fαβ F iηDαψ + i(Dαψβ)χ ]. L M 4 − that show the cohomology sequence Z (70) The supersymmetry transformation law is e ∂ 0 ∂ e +( ) +( ) +(. ) (64) ···→C A →C A →C A → · · · α α δAα = iǫψ , δη =0, δψ =0, In the case of = 2 Wess-Zumino supersymmetric 1 γδ N δχαβ = ǫ(Fαβ + ǫαβγδF ). model, one can choose 2

Q = √ 1ψ¯ ∂ √ 1ψ¯ (∂V )∗, The propagating modes of Aα have helicities (1, 1), 1 − 1 − − 2 − ¯ and those of (η,ψ,χ) have helicities (1, 1, 0, 0). Q2 = √ 1ψ2∂ + √ 1ψ1∂V, (65) − − − The Lagrangian invariant under the fermionic sym- and metry

2 2 2 2 1 H = Q = ∂∂¯ ψ¯ ψ ∂ V ψ¯ ψ (∂ V )∗ + ∂V , (66) δAα = iǫψα, δφ =0, δλ =2iǫη, δη = ǫ[φ, λ], − − 1 1 − 2 2 | | 2 ¯ ¯ 1 γδ is hermitian due to ψ1ψ1 = (ψ2ψ2)∗. δψα = ǫDαφ, δχαβ = ǫ(Fαβ + ǫαβγδF ), (71) One can consider spin 1/2 fermion SU(2) gauge the- − 2 ory with Yukawa coupling, but the pion remains mass- where λ, φ are new scalar fields, becomes less. 1 1 = d4xT r[ F αβ + φD Dαλ L0 4 αβ 2 α ZM D. Supersymmetry and the BRST charge i i +iD ψ χαβ φ[χ ,χαβ] λ[ψ , ψα]]. (72) α β · − 8 αβ − 2 α In topological quantum field theory, Witten de- For any functional , its variation under the fined the charge of Becchi-Rouet-Stora-Tyutin (BRST) fermionic symmetry becomesO transformations[133, 134] which contain Faddeev-Popov ghosts as follows[39]. δ = iǫ Q, . (73) a One begins with gauge fields Ai (x) on a three man- O − ·{ O} ifold Y . Here i = 1, 2, 3 labels the components of a 1 For = 4 T r([φ, λ]η), there is a possibility to add a tangent vector to a manifold M, a runs over the genera- LagrangianO tors of a gauge group G, x labels a point in Y , which is endowed with a metric tensor g . The variation δAa(x) i 1 ij i = s d4x Q, = s d4xT r[ φ[η, η]+ [φ, λ]2] can be regarded as a differential operator on differential L1 { O} 2 8 forn ω on the space : ω δAa(x) ω. The exterior Z Z (74) A → i ∧ derivative and its adjoint on are with s an arbitrary parameter. A By choosing s = 1, the relativistic Lagrangian be- − 3 a δ 3 a δ comes d = d xψi (x) a , d∗ = d xχi (x) a , δAi (x) − δAi (x) Z Z 4 1 αβ 1 α (67) = d x√gT r[ Fαβ F + φDαD λ a a L 4 2 where χi (x) is a vector dual to ψi (x). With a real ZM parameter t, and Chern-Simons functional i iηD ψα + iD ψ χαβ φ[χ ,χαβ] − α α β · − 8 αβ 1 2 W = T r(A dA + A A A), (68) i α i 1 2 2 ∧ 3 ∧ ∧ λ[ψα, ψ ] φ[η, η] [φ, λ] ]. (75) ZY −2 − 2 − 8 10

One deﬁnes a tensor Tαβ such that under an inﬁnites- ghosts are absent may be more favorable to understand imal change of metric gαβ gαβ + δgαβ, the change of symmetries of nature. the action becomes → Experimental check of the standard model, or searches of theories beyond the standard model was per- 1 δ = √gδgαβT . (76) formed at LHC, Belle and other laboratories through L 2 αβ ZM two photon emission measurements. At LHC gluon fu- sions gg X γγ where X scalar bosons including Tαβ can be expressed in the form of BRST commutator 125GeV Higgs→ boson.→ The standard model of the Higgs spectrum is based on SO(5)/SO(4) coset. T = Q, λ (77) αβ { αβ} The group SO(n) is a kernel of determinant map with O(n) 1 . SO(3) is homeomorphic to projection space RP→ {±3[114].} SO(4) is homeomorphic to S3 SO(3). 1 1 R4 H ×3 λ = T r(F χσ + F χσ g F χστ Identifying with the quaternions and S as the αβ 2 ασ β βσ α − 2 αβ στ unit of quaternions, one obtains the homeomorphism 3 1 σ S SO(3) SO(4)[114]. The homomorphism ψ : + T r(ψαDβλ + ψβDαλ gαβψσD λ) 3 × 3 ≈ 2 − S S SO(4) that sends a pair of unit quaternions 1 × → + g T r(η[φ, λ]). (78) 4 αβ (u, v) = (u0I+u1i+u2j+u3k, v0I+v1i+v2j+v3k) (80)

αβ 1 One can show that DαT = 0 [39]. to the isometry w uwv− of H is surjective with the 2 → In contrast to the QBRST c∂cb+c(∂X) , where c,b kernel Z2 = (1, 1) . are conformal ghosts and X ∼is the matter field of Kugo Using octonions{± O}, one can construct a homeomor- and Ojima[135, 136], the supercharge Q is defined on phism SO(8) S7 SO(7), but in other n, SO(n) is 1 ≈ × n 1 twisted manifods M = Y R , and ghosts are absent only a twisted product of S(n 1) S − [114]. As in the supersymmetric theory.× an example, SO(5) is homeomorphic− to× a twisted prod- We investigated the Kugo-Ojima parameter u(0) = uct of SO(4) and S4, SO(5)/SO(4) is homeomorphic to 4 c in lattice Landau gauge QCD, and observed a small S Z2. deviation from c = 1[137, 138]. In lattice simulations, When× Kaluza-Klein 5 dimensional vector gauge the- it is necessary to extrapolate finite size simulation data ory works, an extension of the Higgs model based to continuum limit, and it is difficult to check whether on SO(5)/SO(4) which includes the WZW term is nature satisfies the BRST symmetry[139, 188]. possible[144, 148]. The model is based on spontaneous Schaden and Zwanziger[141] studied BRST cohomol- CP symmetry breaking mechanism of Peccei and Quinn ogy by choosing physical subspace to be the physical (PQ)[145]. sector of the Gribov-Zwanziger (GZ)V theory[140]. The The PQ model is a model of fermions which couple to GZ vacuum breaks BRST symmetry and the Lagrangian non-abelian gauge fields, whose effective action is given is written as by

Y M ghosts Y M = + = + sΨ (79) q 4 L L L L S = d x( + √ 1θq), (81) eff L − The expectation value sΨ becomes zero due to cancel- Z h i 2 2 4 a ãµν lation of fermion ghosts and boson ghosts. where q = (g /32π ) d xFµν F . Watson and Alkofer[142] verified the Kugo-Ojima The rotation of the fermion field by exp(√ 1γ η) in- R 5 confinement criterion with an assumption that the duces a change in the effective action − physical subspace is = Ker(Q ) and physical V BRST states are given by the cohomology (QBRST , ) = H V δSq = √ 1 d4x(∂µj5)η = 2√ 1qη (82) Ker(QBRST )/Im(QBRST ). They showed the leading eff − − µ − − infrared powers of the gluon δ0 and the ghost propa- Z gator ǫ0 are related, and the enhancement of the ghost and the net effect is the rotation θ θ 2η. It induces propagator and suppression of the gluon propagator in spontaneous symmetry breaking which→ − creates Higgs infrared region as compared to tree level calculations bosons. can be understood. In topological classification of 2n free fermions sys- There is an attempt to construct BRST complex that tems [99], 4 Majorana fermion systemc ˆ1cˆ2cˆ3cˆ4 with gives Gupta-Bleuler space of physical states using Co- the so(3) symmetry, and 8 Majorana fermion system homological reductions[143]. Ghosts can be regarded cˆ , , cˆ with the so(8) symmetry were studied. In the 1 ··· 8 as supersymmetric partners of fermions that were re- so(8) space, a subspace 8+ and a subspace 8 which quired to keep 4D space inside the Gupta-Bleuler space. are invariant under so(7) were chosen and the− triality Theories based on quantum K-theory[117, 120] in which symmetry of octonions were taken into account. 11

The Hopf theorem says that there exists a continuous In the mathematical model of strings with Dirichret n 1 n 1 n 1 mapping of S − S − S − where n is a power boundary condition (D-Brane), one can assume the of 2. When n =× 4, the mapping→ S3 S3 S3 can flipped SU(5) U(1)model for hadron interactions[159] be expressed by transformations of three× unit→ vectors and estimate effects× of supersymmetric partner of mat- in S3 represented by quaternion algebra. When n = 8, ters to the mass of Higgs bosons etc. S7 S7 S7 is represented by octonions, and this n =× 8 is largest→ due to the Bott periodicity[17, 114]. The PQ model predicts Goldstone boson [65] and ax- F. Dark Matter and supersymmetry ion like particles[146]. Axion-like particles are (pseudo) scalar particles φ of mass mφ interacting with the stan- Duan et al.[156] proposed a probe of bino-wino coan- dard model electro-weak gauge field-tensor Bµν and Gµν nihilation dark matter below the neutrino floor at the whose interaction Lagrangian is LHC. Winos are SUSY partner of W ± of the MSSM the- 1 1 ory, and the proton-proton collision in LHC that creates g φB B¯ g φG HiggG¯ , (83) winolike χ0 Lφ ⊃−4 φBB µν µν − 4 φgg µν µν 2 0 + 0 pp χ ( l l−χ )χ ± + jets where Bµν is electro weak gauge field-tensor and Gµν is → 2 → 1 1 the Goldstone boson field-tensor. 0 was considered. Here χ1 is the lightest neutralino is a weakly interacting massve particle (WIMP) dark matter E. Extensions of Higgs boson model and (DM) which is a linear combination of gauge eigenstates ¯ ¯ ¯ 0 ¯ 0 supersymmetry (B, W, Hd , Hu), i.e.

χ 0 = N B¯ + N W¯ + N H¯ 0 + N H¯ 0. In minimal supersymmetric standard model 1 11 12 13 d 14 u (MSSM)[3], Higgs field consists of SU(2)L doublet When N 2 > max N 2 ,N 2 + N 2 , χ 0 is called bino- 11 { 12 13 14} 1 + like. Hu 0 Hu = 0 Possibility of detecting DM relic density is discussed. Hu ≥ νu Relations between DM and Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) was studied by Hamdan and Unwin[157]. In the and BBN, DM decomposition is assumed to occur during ra- 0 diation domination. In presence of additional dimension Hd νd Hd = to 4 dimensional space-time, DM can decouple when the Hd− ≥ 0 matter-like universe exists. where H+,H0 are complex scalar fields. The Higgs bosons in the MSSM consists of three massless and five 0 0 0 0 G. Non-local deformation of a supersymmetric massive (h ,H ,H±, A ), and Mh 125GeV. In [149] the tan β parameter in the∼ MSSM is defined field theory as ν Heisenberg uncertainty problem is related to the tan β = u length scale of physics and it is an important ingredient νd for = 1 supersymmetric field theory and conformal N The partner of the standard model fermion are expected field theory [168]. to exist beyond TeV scale and tan β < 5 is ruled out. Materials that are considered are Zeeman driven Lif- In the flamework of search of beyond the stan- shitz transition, which is a phase transition caused by dard model, there is the two Higgs doublet model changes of Fermi surface in a heavy fermion metal [170], (THDM)[150, 151] as an effective field theory below the and theoretical bases were taken from [169]. SUSY scale. In this model, renormalization on tan β was reconsidered by removing sleptons and squarks. In the standard model, CP violation occurs through H. New colored scalar bosons Kobayashi-Maskawa SU(3) matrix phases[152] in c 0 + quark and s quark dynamics D K K−[153, 155] In the search of beyond the standard model, Gabrielli 0 + → and D π π−[154]. et al. [158] proposed a colored scalar boson of mass Authors→ of [150] studied CP violation which can be 750GeV, as a cause of bumps of two-photon final state + detected in 500 GeV e e− collision in International Lin- observed at LHC. The LHC Run 1 and Run 2 data at + ear Collider (ILC) and 380 GeV e e− collision in Com- 7TeV and 8 TeV, the cross section was 4.5 1.9 fb, and pact Linear Collider (CLIC). the data at 13TeV was 10.6 2.9 fb. Their± expectations ± 12 is gg S γγ with triangle diagrams of S gg and The conformal field theory (CFT) is a starting point S γγ→. → → for describing infrared (IR) property of asymptotically →Triangle diagrams appear in the theory of free field theory in which the world sheet descibed by 2 φ × anomaly[160]. 2 symmetric tensor hαβ is parametrized as ηαβ e , where Higgs boson decays to dibosons including γγ was mea- eφ is an unknown conformal factor [18]. A = 2 super- sured at LHC[161, 162] and analyzed as an example in conformal field theory (SCFT) in 4D wasN proposed in [163]. [46]. A 4D SCFT on S3 R for = 1, 2, 4 was studied by Kinney et al. [47]× and inN the case of = 4, I. Superconformal field theory and M-Theory AdS/CFT correspondence of entropy of Bogomolnyi-N Prasad-Sommerfed (BPS) black hole in strong coupling 5 In the string theorry and M-theory, the flux compacti- AdS5 S frameworks. × fiation in background field (Gravitational field) becomes Gadde et al.[48] showed that the superconformal in- necessary. Lazaroiu et al [123] studied supersymmetric dex (the partition function on S3 S1) of a certain class flux compactification of supergravity theories, by defin- of 4D supersymmetric field theories× is exactly equal to ing constrained generalized Killing spinors. A Killing a partition function of q deformed nonsupersymmetric − vector in a Riemann space with metrics gλµ is written 2D Yang-Mills theory. λ ∂ as X = ξ ∂xλ where ξ satisfies Beem et al [49] classified = 2 superconformal field theory using Schur operators[123],N that operates α α α ∂gλµ ∂ξ ∂ξ on quaternions ξ + gλα + gαµ ∂xα ∂xµ ∂xλ Using BRST cohomology, they conjectured that 4D λξµ + µξλ =0. (84) CFT with extended supersymmetry and 2D chiral alge- ∇ ∇ bras have a correspondence. Killing spinor ψ satisfies

X ψ = λX ψ, ∇ · J. Electron-Boson quantum manybody systems where is the Clifford multiplication and considered · Kaehler-Atiyah bundle. In the review article of Caliceti et al.[88], prob- Kaehler metric in complex projective spaces are her- lem of getting physical predictions from slowly con- mitian metric ω = √ 1 g dzα dz¯β that sat- − α,β αβ ∧ vergent series was discussed. Mera et al.[89] applied isfies dω = 0. Lazaroiu et al.[123] referred Gauntlett P hypergeometric resummation technique developed by et al.[125] for the Kaehler-Atiyah metric. Gaunett et themselves[90] and showed that in the calclation of self- al discussed superstring with intrinsic torsion. The are consistent Dyson equtions of electron-boson quantum two types of string theories: 1) open string theory and 2) many-body system, hypergeometric resummation is bet- closed string theory. Gravitational effects in string the- ter than Padéapproximant method. ories can be studied in [18, 19]. For an arbitrary mani- Authors claim that their method is useful in calcula- fold, one can not necessarily define a Kaehler metric[57]. tion of physical observables in a non-equilibrium steady Gauntlett et al. [125] considered complex structures on state electron-boson quantum many-body systems. Dy- the K3 manifold also. Their manifold allows intrinsic namics of electrons interacting with phonons in the pres- torsion on non-Kaehler manifold, like Hopf manifold[57]. ence of applied bias voltage is also discussed. It is well known that superconductivity is well described by Landau-Ginzburg equation[126]. Witten used the Landau-Ginzburg description in = 2 superconformal model[124, 127], and Davenport K. The thermal tensor network Nand Melnikov studied (2, 2) compactified supersymme- ( +1) Dong et al[92] analyzed thermal tensor networks of a try theory with central charge[43] c = N N2 < 6. Kiyoshige and Nishinaka derived formula of three- Ising chain, whose hamiltonian is point functions of 4-dimensional (4D) = 2 su- L perconformal field theories[44] using theN Calabi-Yau H = (JS αSα + BS z). Metric[19]. = 2 super-conformal field theories in − i i+1 i N i 4D was proposed by Seiberg and Witten [40] for intro- X ducing electric-magnetic duality, monopole condensate They used the nonlocal fermionization transformation: and confinement in Yang-Mills theory, and extended to SU(3) supersymmetric gauge theory by Argyres and i 1 − z 1 Douglas [45]. Topological structures of closed strings c = exp[iπ (S + )]S −, i j 2 i were studied. j=1 X 13

i 1 − z 1 + For spinless fermions, the autors consider cyclic c† = exp[ iπ (S + )]S , i − j 2 i groups C2m 1 and C2m which has Z2m 1 and Z2m sym- j=1 − − X metries, respectively. Semidirect products of rotation M z 1 Cn and reﬂection symmetry Z2 which are diheadral ci†ci = Si + , M 2 group Dn = Cn ⋉ Z2 . D2m 1 = D2m = Z2. − The classiﬁcation of C2m 1 for spin 1/2 fermions is + x y y − where Si = Si + √ 1Si , Si− = Sx √ 1Si . same as spinless fermions, but C = Z Z for − − − 2m 2 × 4m The Hamiltonian is transformed to even m and Z8m for odd m. D2m 1 and Dm for spin Z Z Z − L L 1/2 fermion is 1 and 2 2, respectively. BL J Efetov considered in ref.[94]× section 10.3, one dimen- H = B c†c (c† c )(c† + c ). 2 − i i − 4 i − i i+1 i+1 sional fermionic system using the partition function i=1 i=1 X X Linearized tensor renormalization group (LTRG) for Z = exp( S[Φ])DΦ, (85) − bilayers was applied to a fermionc extended Hubbard Z model (EHM). where

∞ m ∂Φ(t) S[Φ] = tr[ ( )2 + V (Φ)]dt, (86) III. SUPERSYMMETRY IN LOW 2 ∂t DIMENSIONAL SPIN SYSTEM Z−∞ and Φ may be real symmetric, general Hermitian or In 1983, Haldane [91] showed in one-dimensional non- composed of real quaternions. Corelation functions of linear sigma model, difference of half-integer spin states interacting fermions were calculated. The topological and integer spin states, which have different instabil- insulator predicted in [95] was applied to the integer ity induces solitons. Couplings of nonlinear zero-point quantum Hall effect and quantum spin Hall effect dis- fluctuation (instantons) were discussed. He studied sta- covered by [97, 98] in the article of [100, 101]. bilities of half-integer spin fermionic systems and integer Kennedy and Zirnbauer[96] studied Z2 symmetric spin fermionic systems. ground states of gapped superconductors using classes In the same year, Efetov [93] studied non-linear su- in the symmetric space. Interactions of electrons are permatrix sigma model, using supervectors and super taken into account, the Z2 symmetry can be broken to matrices, which are based on Berezinian (Grassmann Z8 symmetry[99]. The authors adopted the interaction algebra for fermions)[31]. similar to that of [20], Altland and Zirnbauer [95] studied mesoscopic ˜ junctions of normal-conducting metals and super- H = tT + wWtot + vVtot. (87) conducting metals, using the Efetov’s method. They White[171] studied S =1/2 and S = 1 antiferromag- showed that the system is classified by the symmetry netic one dimensional spin chain, using the density ma- operations of time reversal and rotation of electron’s trix formulation, including configurations of fractional spin, and the 4 symmetry classes of Hamiltonian cor- S =1/2 spins at the ends of open S = 1 chains. responding to time-reversal symmetry (TRS), particle- The supersymmetry method based on using com- hole symmetry (PHS) and chiral symmetry (SLS) which muting and anticommuting variables for bosons and is a product space of TRS and PHS, corresponding fermions, respectively, is a useful tool for studying dis- to Cartan’s symmetric spaces of type C,CI,D and order and chaos[94]. DIII which are called Bogolyubov-de Gennes symme- Supersymmetric extensions of Korteweg-de Vries try classes. (KdV) soliton equation [174], Kadomtzev-Petviashvili Classification of topological insulators and super- (KP) equation [174] and the non-linear equation of conductors in three spacial dimension was studied by Ablowitz-Kaup-Newell-Segur (AKNS) [175] were stud- Schnyder et al.[100]. ied by several authors [178–180]. In Witten’s model, triangle diagrams appear in Using the D operator the argument of symmetry-protected topological (SPT) bosonic phases through Chern-Simons theory [42]. ∂f ∂g Dtfn fn 1 = fn+1fn 2 fnfn 1,Dxf g = g f Symmetry protected topological phases in two dimen- · − − − − · ∂x − ∂x sional fermionic system was studied by Gu and Wen[165] (88) and gapless modes at boundaries were studied by Zhang the KdV equation is et al.[164]. They classified phases of 2D fermionic sym- ∂ ∂3 ∂ ∂2 metry protected topological phase (FSPT) using the u + u +6u u =0, u =2 (logf), technique of induced representations applied to quan- ∂t ∂x3 ∂x ∂x2 tum mechanics[167]. (D4 4D D )f f =0, (89) x − x t · 14 and the KP equation is The Ei’s satisfy commutation rules 3 2 ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ [E0, E1]= 2E2, [E0, E2]=2E1, [E1, E2]= E0, ( u + 3 u +6u u)+ 2 u =0, − ∂x1 ∂x3 ∂x1 ∂x1 ∂x2 [E0, E3]= E3, [E0, E4]= E4, 2 − ∂ [E1, E3]=0, [E1, E4]= E3, [E2, E4]=0, u =2 2 log τ ∂x1 E3, E4 = E0, E3, E3 = 2E1, 4 2 { } { } − (Dx1 4Dx1 Dx3 +3Dx2 )τ τ = 0 (90) E , E =2E . (99) − · { 4 4} 2 The solution of AKNS equation in the inverse scatte- In the case of supersymmetric KP equation[178], ing transform (IST) of Zakharov-Shabat[176, 177] is i pseudo-differential operator L = ∂ + i∞=1 ui∂− and the differential equation 2 q √ 1q 2√ 1q q∗ =0. (91) P t − − xx − − i ∂ ∂iL = [L+,L], ∂i = , (100) In the = 2 supersymmetric extension of KdV equa- ∂ti N 1 tion [180], the resolvent kernel R = ( L + ζ)− where 2 − L = ∂x u(x), is expressed as where L+ is the differential part of the operator L, was − solved. Here even-odd pairs of space variables (x, ξ) and n 1/2 R(x, ζ) = lim R(x, x′; ζ)= Rn[u]ζ− − , (92) even-odd times (τ1,t2, τ3,t4, ) were adopted. x′ x ··· → n X 1 and the residue or the coefficient of ∂− becomes two IV. SYMMETRIES IN PROPAGATION OF times Gelfand-Dikii polynomials Rn, SOLITARY WAVES IN MATTERS

n 1/2 resL − =2Rn. (93) Although magnetic monopoles are not detected, they can be regarded as 3D solitons, and supersymmetry The KdV differential equation is expressed by the dif- have relevance to solitons. Time reversal symmetry ferential equation of the Lax operator L, that satisfy based nonlinear elastic wave spectroscopy, in which one ∂ optimizes the convolution of the scattered wave from [L,Ln+1/2]= L (94) + ∂t defects in materials and its time reversed wave show n peaks was an effective method for non-destructive test- which is equivalent to ing (NDT)[172]. Getting physical information of nonlinear acoustic ∂u equations was performed by using the Lie symmetry of =4∂xRn+1. (95) ∂tn the Khokhlov-Zabolotskaya(KhZa) equation which uses the front form coordinate θ = ω(t x/c0) and a special Supersymmetric extension of the nonlinear AKNS coordinate η(r,z,u)[190, 191]. Details− on possibility of equation was performed by introducing Lie superalge- detecting gravitational effects using AI technique is dis- bra [179], in which the linear problem cussed in [9].

Ψx = (qE2 + iλE0 + rE1 + ǫE3 + βE4)Ψ, ψt = V ψ, (96) A. Conformality in quaternion projective space where ǫ,β are anticommuting variable, r, q are commuting fields, In [116], orthogonal projection of the Dirac operator 1 Γ Q+ = P QP+, where P = ±2 and index i(Q+) for A C α Wess-Zumino− model defined± by the superpotential V (ϕ) V = B A ρ (97) where ϕ is the holomorphic function (ϕ C) becomes  ρ −α 0  Atiyah-Singer index ∈ −   is the temporal evolution operator, A, C are commut- i(Q+)= dimKerQ+ dimKerQ = n+ n (101) ing and α, ρ anticommuting values, are solved. λ is the − − − − eigenvalue of the problem and ψ is the temporal evolu- was verified. The grading Γ is defined by fermionic par- Nf tion. ticle number Nf asΓ=( 1) . t − The state vectors (Bj , Cj ,ρj , αj ) satisfy with Lie su- In TR-NEWS experiment, propagation of a soliton perrecursion operator as is restricted to a 2D plane, and the support of ϕ has L rectangular boundary. An index theorem for Dirac op- t t 2√ 1 (Bj+1, Cj+1,ρj+1, αj+1)= (Bj , Cj ,ρj , αj ). erators in a bounded region was formulated by Atiyah, − L (98) Patodi and Singer[111], and discussed by Witten[42] and 15

Yu et al[196]. Z2 topological order and quantum spin usually undetected. In high energy hadron dynamics, Hall effect, which are related to boundary conditions of parton models which are asymptotically free in high en- conformal field theory was investigated in 2005 by Kane ergy have problems in the infrared region. Lattite QCD and Mele[97, 98]. simulation suggest that quarks are confined and the run- Analtical extensions of differentiable functions de- ning couplings between quarks is infrared stable. fined in closed sets was discussed in 1933 by Unification of the gravitational field and the standard Whitney[17], refined by Seeley[112], and boundary con- model through string theory has not been successful[13]. ditions folllowing the heat equation was studied by It may be due to difficulty of spontaneous symmetry Atiyah, Bott and Patodi[110]. A review of differential breaking, as manifested by the presence of Higgs bosons. calculus of functions that map open interval I to nD real Magnetic monopoles, which are solitons in 3D space are k functions f = (f1, ,fn) C by Taylor expansions not conformal [53, 205]. Even when the potential is sin- ··· ∈ k 1 gular, the field propagators are not necessarily singular. − f(x + y)= f (j)(x; y, y)/j! In analyzing hadron dynamics, duality of conformal ··· 0 field theory and holographic treatement in AdS space 1 X was proposed. Since quarks has masses, QCD is not (k) k 1 + f (x + ty; y, ,y)(1 t) − dt/(k 1)!, conformal, but energy dependence of dynamics suggest ··· − − Z0 that there are conformal windows which patch from low (102) energy regions to high energy regions. Local conformal structure seems to apply not only to where [x, x + y] I and their Fourier-Laplace trans- hadron dynamics, but also dynamics of solitons, which form were shown∈ by Hoermander[131]. A good review have connections to solid state physics. on Atiyah-Singer’s index theorem[107] and Atiyah-Bott- For characterization of the manifold, conformality Shapiro’s Clifford modules[108] are written in the book ∂f of Hirzebruch[113]. Stability of index formulas and played an important role, since ∂z¯ = 0 reduces the free- boundary problems for elliptic differential operators are dom of complex functions f(x, y)= f(z). explained in [132]. In 2D field theory, Mermin-Wegner-Hohenberg In application of mathematical theories to speach theory[186, 187] says that in 2D, ferromagnetism or recognitions or image recognitions, recurrent neural net- antiferromagnetism are absent in isotropic Heisenberg works are commonly used[206]. Parcollet et al.[207] ap- model. Coleman[200] also claimed that in 2D elec- plied quaternion neural networks to image recognitions. tromagnetic field theory spontaneous symmetry break- Although the subject is not directly related to the su- ing is absent. The success of LFHQCD may be due persymmetry, in the analysis of propagation of solitons to the choice of a parameter of Schroedinger equation 2 which are expressed by conformal wave function on rect- ζ = x(1 x)k , which is the 2D Fourier transform of 2[80, 103].− Spontaneous⊥ symmetry breaking or Higgs angular 2D plane, edge effects of solitoic wave should be M taken into account, where Atiyah-Padobi-Singer index effects do not appear in LFHQCD. Chua’s observation could play a role in the analysis in quaternion projec- of currents of memristor[181, 182] suggests validity of tive space[9]. In the analysis of soliton spectroscopy, patched LFHQCD solutions of different τ. the projective quaternions space q1 and q2 that satisfy Recently LFHQCD model succeded to explain polar- q1h hq2 = 0 for a quaternion h are equivalent[201]. ized and unpolarized quark distributions in the proton Applications− of memoducers to nondestructive testing [78, 106]. is recently reviewed by Dos Santos [193]. Analysis of Braam and van Baal[197] showed that mapping from noise in zero-mode solutions of circuits was performed anti-self dual connections on four torus (S1)4 onto in[192]. Measurement of effects of instantons which are anti-self dual connections on the dual torus which is related to the supersymmetry and gravitational forces called the Nahm transformation induces a map be- due to changes of metrics are future problems. tween the relevant instanton modulei spaces[109, 195]. In the analysis of spectroscopy of QED and They considered quaternionic structures on spinors on QCD, the complex projective space Pm in which for 4-manifold, and as a special choice ordinary instantons (z0,z1, ,zm) and zi = 0, only local coordinates on S4. van Baal and van den Heuvel[198] extended the j k··· i 6 3 iζ = z /z (k = i) can be used[129]. idea to the GZ theory of SU(2) on R and constructed 6 the theory of sphalerons analogous to instantons. Since R4 is conformally equivalent to S3 R, gauge fixing V. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION was done on S3 R manifold. By connecting× t = + and t = in R×, one can consider effects of instanton.∞ −∞ Supersymmetry in hadron dynamics is important to I changed the global boundary condition of R from fix poperties of Higgs bosons, they define masses of t = to t = to local periodicity one and consid- quarks, leptons, vector mesons and hadrons. In na- ered−∞S3 S1 which∞ is isomorphic to complex projective ture spersymmetry is broken, and super partners are space CP×3[57]. Clifford algebra on the S1 S3 can be × 16 expressed by quaternions[109, 188, 189]. In a SU(2) spharelon model of Yang-Mills In the twistor formulation of Dunajski[53], projection equation[199], the Riemannian metric and the curvature C2 CP1 of S3 R manifold were calculated. of was considered and stability of exponenti- × atial of→ infinitesimal deformation proven by Kodaira[58] In LFHQCD[75], the metric is contained in the dila- was applied. On a compact surface S, Kodaira [56] ton background field factor and absorbed in the Rarita- defined an automorphism g of a domain W given by Schwinger spinor. 2 1 (z1,z2)= C (0, 0) CP , Constraints on supersymmetry breaking was studied − ∼ by Witten [37] and spontaneous symmetry breaking of m SU(3)L SU(3)R to the diagonal SU(3) was discussed g : (z1,z2) (z′ ,z′ ) = (sz1 + λz ,tz2) (103) × → 1 2 2 in [39]. Bases of these theories seems to exist in Wess- Zumino’s theory[1], as written in my review on super- where m is a positive integer and s,t,λ are constants symmetry. There are no BRST ghosts in the holo- such that graphic lightfront QCD (HLFQCD) approach of Brod- sky et al. and K-theory approach of Connes. 0 < s t < 1, (tm s)λ =0. (104) From the 3 dimensional linear subspace of R3, one | | ≤ | | − can define the sphere S2 and mapping S2 P2 i.e.projective subspace in manifold S3. Quaternion→ pro- and for an infinite cyclic group Z, the quotient surjective space was considered to reduce parameters to face W/Z was homeomorphc to S1 S3. It was shown fit physical data. I would like to point out that super- that the cohomology groups Hν (S1× S3, C(F )), ν = µ group functions in 2D using projective quaternion space 0, 1, 2, vanish for µ = 1, which means× that there is a can be used in physics and engineering which was be curve on··· the patched complex6 areas on the surface S. discussed elsewhere[8, 9]. It is my impression that the In the analysis of solitons propagating on 2D planes, conformality of holonomic functions on projective space quaternion projective space may be useful, by iden- which allow patching local coordinates to global one is tifying real quaternions p1 and p2, if there exists a crucial, and the Hopf manifold proposed by Chern[129] quaternion H 0H such that hp = p h for reducing \{ } 1 2 can be used to understand dynamics of nature. parameters[201]. In literatures[194], projective quater- The supersymmetry was applied to hadron spectrum 4 nion spaces were defined on tangent bundle of S man- region, solid state phisics region and Physics of universe ifold. But they can be defined on 2D plane bundle including the dark matter. I presented a biased view parametrized by τ ± = t z/c[9, 189]. ± of supersymmetry based on the theory of Fubini and As a model of Higgs boson based on SU(4)/Sp(4) was his collaborators, and Brodsky and his collaborators re- also discussed in [147, 148]. Experiments of enhance- lated quark model to particle physics and supersymme- ment of Higgs boson decay into γγ due to WZW term try based on the theory of Efetov and his collaborators via the technicolor was investigated. related to low dimensional spin dynamics and solitons. As an extension of the Maxwell-Gravitation model, There are many good references on supersymmetry, complex octonion model[202] in which a quarternion and I apologize to authors whom I did not mention in He is used for the electromagnetic field and the sec- this review. From mathematical point of view of super- ond quaternion Hg is used for gravitational field and symmetry, DeWitt’s book [208], Freed’s book[209], and complex octonion field a concise encyclopedia of supersymmetry edited by Du- plij, Siegel and Bagger [43] and references therein are helpful. H(hα)= √ 1h0i + hri + √ 1h4i + h4+ri , − 0 r − 4 4+r (r =1, 2, 3) Aknowledgement I thank Stanley Brodsky for sending information of works in his group, Guy de was proposed. In the curved space metric was defined Téramond and Serge Dos Santos for helpful discus- ¯α β as gαβ¯ du du , depending on the coordinates of quater- sions, late Professor Hideo Nakajima for collaboration nions. It is not clear whether the affine connection on lattice simulations, physics research organizations in of complex octonions can express correct curvature in France, Germany for giving me oppotunities to study Maxwell-Gravitation models. Metric tensors gαβ¯ should symmetry between 1972 and 1989, Dr. Claude Amsler satisfy for attracting my attention to [83] and Professor Steven Duplij of Kharkov University in Ukraine for sending me a b a the book of encyclopedia of supersymmetry[43] in 2005. gαβ¯ (x)= ηabeα¯(x)eβ(x)= eα¯ebβ (105) Thanks are also due to libraries of Tokyo Institute of

b Technology and the library of the institute of mathe- where η is the Minkowski metric, and ebβ = ηabeβ. matical science of the University of Tokyo for allowing Whether such a metric can be deﬁned by quaternion consulting references. basis vectors instead of usual spinors is not obvious. 17

[1] J. Wess and B. Zumino, Supergauge Transformation in Holes, Information and the String Theory Revolution, Four Dimension, Nucl. Phys. B70 39-50 (1974). World Scientific, New Jersey (2005). [2] E.C.G. Sudarshan and N. Mukunda, Quantum The- [24] S.J. Brodsky, G.F. de Téramond, H. Dosch and J. Er- ory of the Infinite-Component Majorana Field and the lich, Light-front holographic QCD and emerging con- Relation of Spin and Statistics, Phys. Rev. D 1 (2) finement, Phys. Rept. 584 1-106 (2015). 571-583 (1970). [25] G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Observation of a [3] Patrick Labelle, Supersymmetry Demystified, new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs McGraw-Hill Comp., (2010). boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. [4] G. ‘t Hooft, Renormalizable Lagrangians for Massive B 716 1 (2012). Yang-Mills Fields, Nucl. Phys. B35 167-188 (1971). [26] S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Observation [5] G. ‘t Hooft and M. Veltman,Combinatrics of Gauge of a new boson at a mass of 125GeV with the CMS Fields, Nucl. Phys. B 50 318-353 (1972). experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 30 (2012). [6] G. ‘t Hooft, Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge [27] W. Bernreuther, P. Galler, C. Mellein, Z.-G. Si and Theories, Nucl. Phys. B79 276-284 (1974). P. Uwer, Production of heavy Higgs bosons and decay [7] G. ‘t Hooft, Models for Confinement, Progress of The- into top quarks at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 93, 034032 oretical Physics Supplement 167 144-154 (2007). (2016). [8] Sadataka Furui and Serge Dos Santos, Application of [28] P.A.M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Quaternion Neural Network to Time reversal based 4th Ed. Oxford University Press, Mizuho Shobo Pub. Nonlinear Elastic wave Spectroscopy, Presentation in Tokyo (1963). JPS Spring meeting 2020. [29] M. Kocher and R. Remmert, The Isomorphism Theo- [9] Sadataka Furui and Serge Dos Santos, Application of rems of Frobenius, Hopf and Gelfand-Mazur, in Zahlen, Quaternion Neural Network to Time Reversal Based Grundwissen Mathematik 1, (1988), translated in En- Nonlinear Elastic Wave Spectroscopy, To be submit- glish, Numbers, Springer-Verlag, New York (1990). ted. [30] F. Hirzebruch, Division Algebras and Topology, in [10] H. Georgi and S.L. Glashow, Unified Weak and Electro- Zahlen, Grundwissen Mathematik 1, (1988) trans- magnetic Interactions without Neutral Currents, Phys. lated in English, Numbers, Springer-Verlag, New York Rev. Lett. 28 (22) 194-1497 (1972) (1990). [11] Pertti Lounesto, Clifford Algebras and Spinors, Second [31] F. A. Berezin, The method of second quantization, Edition, Cambridge University Press, UK (2001). Translated to English by N. Mugibayashi and A. Jef- [12] A.M. Polyakov, Compact gauge fields and theinfrared ferey, Academic Press (1966). catastrophe Phys. Lett. B59 82-84 (1975). [32] H. Nicolai, Supersymmetry and spin system, J. Phys.A. [13] A.M. Polyakov, Gauge Fields and Strings , Harwood Math. Gen. 9 1497-1506 (1976). Academic Publishers, Chur (1987). [33] C.N. Yang and R.L. Mills, Conservation of Isotopic [14] Charles Nash and Siddhartha Sen, Topology and Ge- Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance, Phys. Rev, 96 ometry for Physicists, Dover Publications INC, Mine- 191-195 (1954). ola, New York (1983). [34] P.A.M. Dirac, Forms of Relativistic Dynamics, Rev. [15] Yakov M. Shnir, Magnetic Monopoles, Springer -Verlag Mod. Phys. 21 392-199, (1949). Berlin Heidelberg (2005). [35] P.A.M. Dirac, Generalized Hamiltonian Dynamics, [16] S.K. Donaldson, An Application of Gauge Theory to Can, J. Math. 2 129 (1950). Four Dimensional Topology, J. Dfferential Geometry, [36] Edward Witten, Supersymmetry and Morse Theory, J. 16 279-315, (1983). Differential Geometry 17 661-692 (1982). [17] Raoult Bott and Loring W. Tu, Differential Forms in [37] Edward Witten, Constraints on Supersymmetry Break- Algebraic Topology, Springer-Verlag, New York (1982). ing, Nucl. Phys. B202,253-316 (1982). [18] B. Green, J.H. Schwarz and E. Witten, Superstring [38] Edward Witten, Supersymmetry and Morse Theory, J. Theory I, Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Differential Geometry 17 661-692 (1982). Cambridge (1986). [39] Edward Witten, Topological Quantum Field Theory, [19] B. Green, J.H. Schwarz and E. Witten, Superstring Commun. Math. Phys. 117, 353-386 (1988). Theory II, Loop Amplitudes and Phenomenology, Cam- [40] N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Electric-magnetic duality, bridge University Press, Cambridge (1987). monopole condensation, and confinement in =2 su- [20] V. de Alfaro, S. Fubini and G. Furlan, Conformal In- persymmetric Yang -Mills theory, Nucl. Phys.N B426 variance in Quantum Mechanics, Nuovo Cim. A 34, 19-52 (1994) 569 (1976); Ref. TH.2115-CERN (1976). [41] Edward Witten, Anti de Sitter Space and Hologra- [21] S. Fubini and E. Rabinovici, Superconformal Quantum phy, Adv, Theor. Math. Phys. 2 253-291 (1998); Mechanics, Nucl. Phys. B 245, 17-44 (1984). arXiv;hep-th/9802150 [22] Juan Maldacena, The large limit of superconfor- [42] Edward Witten, Fermion Path Integrals and Topolog- mal field theories and supergravityN , Adv. Theor. Math. ical Phases, arXiv:1508.04715 v2[cond-mat.mes-hall] Phys.2 231 (1998); arXiv hep-th/971120; Int. Jour. (2015). Theor. Phys. 38 (4) 1113-1133, (1999). [43] S. Duplij, W.Siegel and J. Bagger Ed. Concise Ency- [23] L. Susskind and J. Lindesay, An Introduction to Black clopedia of Supersymmetry, Kluwer Academic Publish- 18

ers, Dordrecht,Boston,London (2004). [65] T.W.B. Kibble, Symmetry Breaking in Non-Abelian [44] Kazuki Kiyoshige and Takahiro Nishinaka, OPE selec- Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. 155 1554 (1967). tion rules for Shur multiples in 4D = 2 supercon- [66] Steven Weinberg, Supersymmetry at ordinary energies. formal field theories, JHEP 04 060 (2019).N Masses and conservation laws, Phys. Rev. D26(1) 287 [45] Philip C. Argyres and Michel R. Douglas, New Phe- (1982). nomena in SU(3) Supersymmetric Gauge Theory, [67] L. Guillou and A. Manin ed. A` la recherche de Nucl. Phys. B 448 93 (1995); arXiv: hep-th/9505062. la Topologie Perdue, Birkh´’auser, Boston, Basel, [46] P.C. Argyres, M.R. Plesser, N. Seiberg and E. Wit- Stuttgart, (1986). ten, New = 2 Superconformal Field Theories in N [68] Prem P. Srivastava and Stanley J. Brodsky, Light- Four Dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 461 71 (1996); arXiv front-quantized QCD in the light-cone gauge* The dou- hep-th/9511154. bly transverse gauge propagator, Phys. Rev. D64, [47] J. Kinney, J. Maldacena, S. Minwalla and S. Raju, An 045006, 1-15 (2001). Index for 4 Dimensional Super Conformal Theories, [69] Prem P. Srivastava and Stanley J. Brodsky, Light-front Commun. Math. Phys. 275, 209-254 (2007). formulation of the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 66, [48] A. Gadde, L. Rastelli, S.S. Razamat and W. Yan, Four 045019 (2002). Dimensional Superconformal Index from q Deformed − [70] Guy F. de Téramond and Sanley J. Brodsky, Hadronic Two Dimensional Yang-Mills Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. Spectrum of a Holographic Dual of QCD, Phys. Rev. 106, 241602 (2011). Lett. 94, 201601 (2005). [49] C. Beem, M. Lemos, P. Liendo, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli [71] Stanley J. Brodsky, The Conformal Template and New and B. C. van Rees, Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Perspective for Quantum Chromodynamics, Progress Dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys. 336, 2359-1433 of Theoretical Physics Supplement 167 76-94 (2007). (2015). [72] S. J. Brodsky and G. F. de Téramond, Hadronic Spec- [50] L.D. Faddeev and V. Popov, Feynman diagrams for tra and Light-Front Wave Functions in Holographic the Yang-Mills Field, Phys. Letters 25B 29 (1967). QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 201601 (2006). [51] Konrad Bleuler, The Gauge Principle in Modern [73] Guy F. de Téramond, Hans Guenter Dosch and Stan- Physics, Fundamental Aspects of Quantum Theory, ley J. Brodsky, Kinematical and Dynamical Aspects Ed. by V. Gorini and A. Frigerio, Plenum Pub. Corp. of Higher-Spin Bound-State Equations in Holographic 279-288 (1986). QCD, Phys Rev. D87, 075005 (2013); arXiv:1301.1651 [52] M. Dunajski and S. West, Anti-self-dual conformal [hep-ph]. structures from projective structures, Commun. Math. [74] Guy F. de Téramond, Hans Guenter Dosch and Stan- Phys. 272, 85-118 (2007): arXiv:math/0610280v5 ley J. Brodsky, Baryon Spectrum from Superconformal [math.DG] (2010). Quantum Mechanics and its Light-Front Holographic [53] Marciej Dunajski, Solitons Instantons and Twistors, Embedding, Phys. Rev. D91,045040 (2015); arXiv: Oxford Mathematics (2010). 1411.5243v2[hep-ph]. [54] M.K. Prasad and C.M. Sommerfield , Exact Classical [75] G.F. de Téramond, H.G. Dosch and S.J. Brodsky, Solution for the ˆt Hooft Monopole and the Julia-Zee Baryon Spectrum from Superconformal Quantum Me- Dyon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35 (12) 760-762 (1975). chanics and its Light-Front Holographic Embedding, [55] E.B. Bogomolnyi, Stability of Classical Solutions, Sov. Phys. Rev. D91,045040; arXiv.1411.5243v2[hep-ph]. J. Nucl. Phys. 24, 449 (1976). [76] Stanley J. Brodsky, Light-Front Holography, Color [56] K. Kodaira, Complex Structures on S1 S3, Mathe- × Confinement and Supersymmetric Features of matics 55, 240-243 (1966). 6th Ed. (1967). QCD, Invited talk presented at Light Cone 2015, [57] Kunihiko Kodaira, Complex Manifolds (in Japanese) arXiv:1601.06328v1 [hep-ph] (2016). Iwanami Shoten Pub. Tokyo (1992). [77] S.J. Brodsky, G. de Téramond, H.G. Dosch and C. [58] K. Kodaira, On the stability of compact submanifolds Lorcé, Universal Effective Hadron Dynamics from Su- of complex manifolds, Am. J. Math. 85, 79-94 (1963). perconformal Algebra, arXiv:1604.06746v2 [hep-ph], [59] M.F. Atiyah and R.S. Ward, Instantons and Algebraic SLAC-PUB-16504 (2016). Geometry, Commun. math. Phys. 55, 117-124 (1977). [78] Guy F. de Téramond, T. Liu, R.S. Suffian, H. Dosch, [60] R.S. Ward, Ansaetze for Self-Dual Yang-Mills Fields, S.J. Brodsky and A. Deur (HLFHS Collaboration), Commun. Math. phys.80,563-574 (1981). Universality of Generalized Parton Distributions in [61] R.S. Ward, Soliton solutions in an integrable chiral Light-Front Holographic QCD, arXiv:1801.09154 v3 model in 2 + 1 dimensions, J. Math. Phys. 29, 386- (2018). 389 (1988). [79] Stanley J. Brodsky, Supersymmetric and Conformal [62] R. Penrose and W. Rindler, Spinors and space-time Features of Hadron Physics, Universe 2018, 4, 120 vol. 1&2, Spinor and Twistor Methods in Space-time (2018). Geometry, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical [80] Stanley J. Brodsky, Color Confinement and Supersym- Physics, Canbridge (1986). metric Properties of Hadron Physics from Light-Front [63] F. Englert and R. Brout, Broken Symmetry and the Holography, IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13(9) Conf. Series 1137 012027 (2019). 321-323 (1964). [81] S.J. Brodsky, G. F. de Téramond and H. G. Dosch, [64] P.W. Higgs, Spontaneous Symmetry Breakdown with- Light-Front Holography and Supersymmetric Confor- out Mass-less Bosons, Phys. Rev. 145 1156-1163 mal Algebra: A Novel Approach to Hadron Spec- (1966). 19

troscopy, Structure, and Dynamics, rXiv:2004.07756v1 the topological classification of free fermion systems, [hep-ph] (2020). Phys. Rev. B 81, 134509 (2010). [82] Gerard ‘t Hooft, Deterministic Quantum Mechanic: [100] A.P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki and A.W. W. Lud- The Mathematical Equations, Frontiers in Physics,8 wig, Classification of Topological insulators and super- Article 253 (2020). conductots in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B [83] The CMS Collaboration, Measurement of the 78, 195125 (2008). Upsilon(1S) pair production cross section and search [101] G. De Nittis and K. Gomi, Classification of “Quater- − for resonances decaying to Υ(1S)µ+µ in proton- nionic” Bloch-Bundles, Topological Quantum System proton collisions at √s = 13TeV, To be published in of Type AII, Commun. Math. Phys. 339, 1-55 (2015). Phys. Lett B (2020). [102] G. De Nittis and K. Gomi, Differential Geomet- [84] R.S. Sufian, T. Liu, A. Alexandru, S.J. Brodsky, G. de ric Invariants for Time-Reversal Symmetric Bloch- Téramond, H.G. Dosch, T. Draper, K-F. Liu and Y- Bundles: The “Real” Case, arXiv:1502.01232v2 [math- B. Yang, Constraints on charm-anticharm asymmety ph] (2016). in the nucleon from lattice QCD, To be published in [103] Ruben Sandapen, An overview of light-front hologra- Phys. Lett. B (2020). arXiv:2003.01078v2 [hep-ph]. phy, arXiv:2001.03479v1[hep-ph]. [85] J-P. Lansberg, H-S. Shao, N. Yamanaka, Y-J. Zhang [104] Rapahel Bousso, The holographic principle, Rev. Mod. and C. Noûs, Complete NLO QCD study of single Phys. 74 (3), 825-874, (2002). and double-quarkonium hadroproduction in the colour [105] S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic Derivation -evapolation model at the Tevatron and the LHC, To of Entanglement Entropy from the anti-de Sitter be published in Nucl. Phys.B (2020) Space/Conformal Field Theory Correspondence, Phys. [86] J-P. Landesberg and H-S. Shao, Production of J/ψ+ηc Rev. Lett. 96, 181602 (2006). 5 versus J/ψ + J/ψ at the LHC: Importance of Real αs [106] T. Liu, R.S. Suffian, Guy F. de Téramond, H. Correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 122001 (2013). Dosch, S.J. Brodsky and A. Deur (HLFHS Collabora- [87] J-P. Landesberg, New Observables in Inclusive Produc- tion), Unified Description of Polarized and Unpolarized tion of Quarkonia, arXiv;1903.09185v1 [hep-ph]. Quark Distributions in the Proton, Phys. Rev. Lett. [88] E. Caliceti, M. Meyer-Hermann P. Ribeca, A. 124 ,082003 (2020). Surzhykov and U.D. Jentschura, From useful algo- [107] M.F. Atiyah and I.M. Singer, The Index of Elliptic rithm for slowly convergent series to physical predic- Operators on Compact Manifolds, Bull. Am. Math. 87, tions based on divergent perturbative expansions, Phys. 422-433 (1963). Rept. 446 (1-3) 1-96 (2007). [108] M.F. Atiyah, R. Bott and A. Shapiro, [89] H. Mera, T. G. Pedersen and B.K. Nikolic, Hyper- Clifford Modules, Topology 3, suppl 1 3- geometric resummation of self-consistent sunset dia- 38 (1964): The University of Edinburg, gram for steady-state electron-boson quantum many- www.math.ed.ac.uk/ v1ranick/papers/abs.pdf. body systems out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. B 94, [109] M.F. Atiyah, H.J. Hiitchin, V.G. Drinfeld and Yu.I. 165429 (2016). Manin, Construction of Instantons, Phys. Lett. B 65A [90] H. Mera, T. G. Pedersen and B.K. Nikolic, Nonpertur- (3) 185-187 (1977). bative Quantum Physics from Low-Order Perturbation [110] M. Atiyah, R. Bott and V.K. Patodi, On the Heat Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 143001 (2015). Equation and the Index Theorem, Inventions Math. 19 [91] F.D.M. Haldane, Nonlinear Field Theory of Large-Spin 279-330 (1973); Errata Inventions Math. 28 277-280 Heisenberg Antiferromagnets: Semiclassically Quan- (1975). tized Solitons of the One-Dimensional Easy-Axis Néel [111] M.F. Atiyah, V.K. Patodi and I.M. Singer, Spectral State, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (15) 1153-1156 (1983). asymmetry and Riemannian geometry, J. Math. Proc. [92] Y-L. Dong, L. Chen, Y-J. Liu and W. Li, Bilayer lin- Cambridge Philos. Soc. 77 43-69 (1975). ∞ earized tensor renormalization group approach for ther- [112] R.T. Seeley, Extension of C Functions Defined in a mal tensor networks, Phys. Rev. B 95, 144428 (2017). Half Space, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 15 625-626 (1964). [93] K. B. Efetov, Supersymmetry and theory of disordered [113] F. Hirzebruch, Topological Methods in Algebraic Ge- metals, Advances in Physics, 32(1) 53-127 (1983) ometry, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1978). [94] Konstantin Efetov, Supersymmetry in Disorder and [114] Allen Hatcher, Algebraic topology, Cambridge Univer- Chaos, Cambridge University Press (1997). sity Press, Cambridge(UK),(2001). [95] Alexander Altland and Martin R. Zirnbauer, Non- [115] A. Jaffe, A. Lesniewski and M. Lewenstein, Ground standard symmetry classes in mesoscopic normal- State Structure in Supersymmetric Quantum Mechan- superconducting hybrid structures, Phys. Rev. B 55 ics,Annals of Physics 178, 313-329 (1987). (2) 1142-1161, (1997). [116] A. Jaffe, A. Lesniewski and J. Weitsman, Index of a [96] R. Kennedy and M.R. Zirnbauer, Bott Periodicity for family of Dirac operators on loop space, Comm. Math. Z2 Symmetric Ground States of Gapped Free-Fermion Phys. 112 75-88 (1983). Systems, Commun. Math. Phys. 342, 909-963 (2016). [117] A. Jaffe, A. Lesniewski and K.Osterwalder, Quantum [97] C.L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Z2 Topological Order and K-Theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 118 1-14 (1988). the Quantum Spin Hall Effect, Phys.Rev. Lett 95, [118] Alain Connes and John Lott, Particle Models and Non- 146802 (2005). commutative Geometry”, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc.Supp.) [98] C.L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum Spin Hall Efects 18B 29-47 (1990). in Graphene, Phys.Rev. Lett 95, 226801 (2005). [119] Alain Connes, Geometie non commutative, Inter Edi- [99] L. Fidkowski and A. Kitaev, Effects of interactions on tions, Paris (1990); Translated to Japanese by F. 20

Maruyama, Iwanami Shoten Pub. (1999). limit of lattice gauge theory by BRS invariance, Nucl. [120] Alain Connes, Noncommutative Geometry, Academic Phys. B 399 477-513 (1993). Press, An Imprint of Elsevier, San Diego, New York, [141] Martin Schaden and Daniel Zwanziger, BRST Boston (1994). cohomology and physical space of GZ model, [121] A.H. Chamseddine and A. Connes, The Spectral Action arXiv:1412.4823 v3 [hep-ph] (2015). Principle, Commun. Math. Phys. 186 731-750 (1997). [142] P. Watson and R. Alkofer, Verifyingthe Kugo- [122] Alain Connes, Geometry and the Quantum, OjimaConfinement Criterionin Landau Gauge Yang- arXiv:1703.02470 v1 [hep-th]. Mills theory, arXiv: hep-ph/0102332v2 (2018). [123] C. I. Lazaroiu, E.M. Babalic and I.A. Coman, Geomet- [143] Zbigniev Hasiewicz and Jan L. Cie´sliński, BRST Coho- ric Algebra techniques in Flux Quantifications, Adv. mologies of Mixed and Second Class Constraints, Sym- High Energy Phys. 2016, 7292534 (2016). metry 2020, 12, 428 (2020). [124] A.A. Rosky , A.S. Schwarz and A.A.Voronov, Ge- [144] S. Knapen, T. Melia, M. Papucci and K.M. Zurek, ometry of Superconformal Manifolds, Commun. Math. Rays of light from the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 93, 075020 Phys. 119, 129-152 (1988). (2016). [125] J.P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli and D. Waldram, Super- [145] R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the strings with intrinsic torsion, Phys. Rev. D69 086002 Presence of Pseudoparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (25) (2004). 1440-1443 (1977). [126] Charles Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, 3rd [146] J. Jaeckel, M. Jankowiak and M. Spannowsky, LHC Edition, John Wiley and Sons Inc, (1966); Translated probes the hidden sector, Physics of the Dark Universe to Japanese by Uno et al. Maruzen (1968). 2 111-117 (2013). [127] Edward Witten, On the Landau-Ginzburg Description [147] J. Barnard, T. Ghergetta and T.S. Ray, UV descrip- of N = 2 Minimal Models, Nucl. Phys. B403 159 tions of composite Higgs models without elementary (1993). scalars, JHEP 1402 002 (2014), arXiv; 1311.6562 [hep- [128] I.C. Davenport and I.V. Melnikov, Landau-Ginzburg ph]. skeletons, JHEP05, 050 (2017). [148] A. Arbey, G. Cacciapaglia, H. Cai, A. Deandrea, S. Le [129] S.S. Chern, Complex Manifolds Without Potential Corre and F. Sannino, Fundamental Composite Elec- Theory, D. Van Nostrand Company, INC, Princeton troweak Dynamics: Status at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D NewJersey (1967). 95, 015028 (2017). [130] D.J.H. Garling, Clifford Algebras: An Introduction, [149] H. Bahl, S. Lieber and T. Stefaniak, MSSM Higgs London Mathematical Society Student Texts 78, Cam- benchmrk scenarios for Run2 and beyond: the low tanβ bridge University Press, New York (2011). region, Eur. Phys. J. C79 279 (2019). [131] Lars Hoermander, Linear Partial Differential Equation [150] W. Bernreuther, L. Chen, I. Garcia, M. Perelló, R. I, Springer- Verlag, Berlin (1983). Poeschl, F. Richard, E. Ros and M. Vos, CP-violating [132] Lars Hoermander, Linear Partial Differential Equation top quark couplings at future linear e+e− colliders, III, Springer- Verlag, Berlin (1987). Eur. Phys. J. C78 155 (2018). [133] C. Becchi, A. Rouet and R. Stora, Renormalization of [151] H. Bahl and W. Hollik, Precise prediction of the MSSM the abelian Higgs-Kibble model, Commun. Math. Phys, Higgs boson masses for low MA, JHEP07 182 (2018). 42 127 (1975). [152] M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, CP Violation in the [134] I.V. Tyutin, Gauge invariance in field theory and sta- Renormalizable Theory of Weak Interaction, Prog. tistical mechanics, Lebedev preprint FIAN, no. 39 Theor. Phys. 49 (2), 652-657 (1973). (1975). [153] J. Miller, Charm-quark decays violate charge-parity [135] Taichiro Kugo and Izumi Ojima, Manifestly Covariant symmetry, Physics Today72 (8) (2019). Canonical Formulation of Yang-Mills Theories, Physi- [154] R. Aaij et al, (LHCb Collab.), Evidence for CP Vi- − cal state Subsidiary Conditions and Physical S-Matrix olation in Time-Integrated D0 h h+ Decay Rates, Unitarity, Phys. Lett. 73B 459-462 (1978). Phys Rev. Lett. 108 11602 (2012),→ [136] Taichiro Kugo and Izumi Ojima, Local Covariant Op- [155] R. Aaij et al, (LHCb Collab.), Observation of CP Vio- erator Formalism of Non-Abelian Gauge Theories and lation in Charm Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 211803 Quark Confinement Problems, Supp. of Prog. Theor. (2019). Phys. 661-129 (1979) [156] G. H. Duan, K.-i. Hikasa, J. Ren, L. Wu and J.M. [137] Hideo Nakajima and Sadataka Furui, Test of the Kugo- Yang, Probing bino-wino coannilation dark matter be- Ojima Confinement Criterion in the Lattice Landau low the neutrino floor at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. Gauge, Lattice ’99 proceedings, University of Pisa, D98, 015010 (2018). Italy, July 1999, Nucl. Phys. B(Proc. Suppl.) 83-84 [157] S. Hamdan and J. Unwin, Dark matter freeze-out dur- 521-523 (2000), arXiv:hep-lat/9909008. ing matter domination, Modern Physics Letters A 33 [138] Hideo Nakajima and Sadataka Furui, Infrared Features (29) 1850181 (2018). of the Lattice Landau Gauge QCD, Nucl. Phys. B(Proc [158] E. Gabrielli, K, Kannike, B. Mele, M. Raidal, C. Suppl.) 129 - 130, 730-732 (2004). Spethmann and H.Veermae, A SUSY inspired simpli- [139] Sadataka Furui and Hideo Nakajima, Effects of the fied model fo the 750GeV diphoton excess, Physics Let- quark field on the ghost propagator of Lattice Landau ters B756 36-41 (2016). Gauge QCD, Phys. Rev. D 73, 094506 (2006), arXiv: [159] R. De Benedetti, C. Li, T. Li, A. Lux, J.A. Maxin 0602027[hep-lat]. and D. V. Nanopoulos, Inspiration from intersecting [140] Daniel Zwanziger, Renormalizability of the critical D-branes: general supersymmetry breaking soft terms 21

in no-scale SU(5), Eur. Phys. J. C 78 958 (2018). Modulation of Waves in Nonlinear Media, Sov. Phys. [160] K. Fujikawa,F− Path-Integral Measures for Gauge- JETP 34 (1) 62-69 (1972). Invariant Fermion Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42 (18) [177] V.E. Zakharov and A.B. Shabat, Interaction between 1195-1198 (1979). solitons in a stable medium, Sov. Phys. JETP 37 (5) [161] ATLAS Collaboration, Measurements of Higgs boson (1973). production and couplings in diboson final states with [178] Y. I. Manin and A.O. Radul, A Supersymmetric Exten- the ATLAS detecor at the LHC, Phys. Letters B 726 sion of the Kadomtsev-Petviashvilli Hierarchy, Com- 88-119 (2013). mun. Mathematical Physics. 98, 65-77 (1985). [162] ATLAS Collaboration, Corregium, Phys. Letters B [179] A.R. Choudhury and S. Roy, On the Baecklund trans- 734 406 (2014) formation and Hamiltonian properties of super evalu- [163] Sadataka Furui, Cartan’s Supersymmetry and the De- ation equations, J. Math. Phys. 27 (10) (1986). cay of a H0(0+), arXiv: 1504,03795v5 [hep-ph] (2016). [180] I.N. McAthour and C.M. Yung, Gelfand-Dikii Analysis [164] Jian-Hao Zhang, Qing-Rui Wang, Shuo Yang, Yang Qi for N = 2 Supersymmetric KdV Equations, Commun. and Zheng-Cheng Gu, Construction and classification Math. Phys. 152 1-18 (1993). of point-group symmetry-protected topological phases [181] L. O. Chua, Memristor - The missing circuit element, in two-dimensonalintercting fermionic systems, Phys. IEEE Trans. Circuit Th. CT-18 507-519 (1971). Rev, B 101, 100501 (2020). [182] L. Chua, Five non-volatile memristor enigmas solved, [165] Zheng-Cheng Gu and Xiao-Gang Wen, Symmetry- Appl. Phys. A 124 563 (2018). protected topological order for interacting fermions: [183] S. Dos Santos, Symmetry of nonlinear acoustic equa- Fermionic topological nonlinear σ models and a spec- tions using group theoretic methods : a signal process- tral group supercohomology theory, Phys. Rev. B 90, ing tool for extracting judicious physical variables, In 115141 (2014). proceedings of the joint congress CFA/DAGA, Stras- [166] Qing-Rui Wang and Zheng-Cheng Gu, Construc- burg pp. 549-550 (2004). tion and classification of symmetry protected [184] S. Furui and T. Takano, On the amplitude of Exter- topological phases in interacting fermion systems, nal Perturbation and Chaos via Devil’s Staircase in arXiv:1811.00536v3 [cond-mat. str-el]. Muthuswamy-Chua System, International Journal of [167] G. W. Mackey, Induced Representations of Groups and Bifurcation and Chaos, 23 1350136 (2014), arXiv:[nlin Quantum Mechanics, W.A. Benjamin, INC, New York CD] 1406.4346 (1968). [185] I.Y. Solodov and B. A. Korshak, Instability, Chaos, [168] Q. Zhao, M. Faizal, M.B. Shah, A. Bhat, P,A. Ganal, and ”Memory” in Acoustic-Wave-Crack Interaction, Z. Zaz, S. Masood, J. Raza and R.M. Irfan. Non- PRL 88 (1) 014303 (2002). local deformation of a supersymmetric field theory, Eur [186] N.D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of Ferro- Phys. J. C. 77 612 (2017). magnetism and Antiferromagnetism in One or Two- [169] B. Bercx and F.F. Assad, Metamagnetism and Lifshitz Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Models, Phys. Rev. transitions in metala for heavy fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17(22)1133-1136 (1966). B86, 075108 (2012). [187] P.C. Hohenberg. Existence of Long-Range Order in [170] A. Hakle and M. Vojta, Zeeman-Driven Lifshitz Tran- One and Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev. 158 (2) 383 sition: A model for Experimentally observed Fermi- (1967). Surface Reconstruction in Y bzRh2Si2, Phys. Rev. [188] S. Furui, A Closer Look at Gluons, Chapter 6 of a book Lett.106, 137002 (2011). “Horizon in World Physics vol. 302”, Ed. by Albert [171] Steven R. White, Density Matrix Formulation for Reimer, Nova Scientific Pub. (2020). Quantum Renormalization Group, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 [189] S. Furui, Understanding Quaternions, A chapter of a (19) 2863-2866 (1992). book to be published from Nova Scientific Pub. [172] V. Bacot, M. Labousse, A. Eddi, M. Fink and E. Fort, [190] S. Dos Santos, Symmetry of nonlinear acoustics equa- Time reversal and holography with spacetime transfor- tion using group theoretic methods : a signal process- mations, Nature Physics 12 972-977 (2016). ing tool for extracting judicious physical variables, Pro- [173] L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Theory of Elastic- ceedings of the Joint Congress CFA/DAGA’04, Stras- ity, (1959), Translated from Russian by J.B. Sykes burg 2004, 549-550 (2004). and W.H. Reid , Pergamon (1964); E. Lifshitz and V. [191] S. Dos Santos and O. Bou Matar, Symmetry of Bérestetski, 4th edition (1987), Translated to Japanese KZ(khokholov-Zaboltskaya) equation, preprint (2004). by J. Sato and Z. Ishibashi, Tokyo Tosho Pub. (1989). [192] S. Dos Santos and C. Plag, Excitation Symmetry Anal- [174] T. Miwa, M. Jimbo and E. Date, Solitons: Dif- ysis Method (ESAM) for Calculation of Higher Order ferential Equations, Symmetries and Infinite Dimen- Nonlinearity, Int. J. Nonlinear Mech. 43 p. 114-118 sional Algebras, Cambridge University Press, Cam- (2008). bridge (2000), Translated from Japanese edition pub- [193] S. Dos Santos, Advanced ground truth multiodal imag- lished by Iwanami Shoten (1993). ing using Time Reversal (TR) based Nonlinear Elastic [175] M.J. Ablowitz, D. J. Kaup, A.C. Newell and H. Segur, Wave Spectroscopy (NEWS): medical imaging trends The Inverse Scattering Transform-Fourier Analysis for versus non-destructive testing applications, Chapter Nonlinear Problems, Studies in Applied Mathematics, 4 in S. Dos Santos et al.(eds), Recent Advances in vol LIII (4) M.I.T. (1974). Matematics and Technology, Applied and Numerical [176] V.E. Zakharov and A.B. Shabat, Exact Theory of Two- Harmonic Analysis, Springer Nature Switzerland AG Dimensional Self-focusing and One-Dimensional Self- (2020). 22

[194] R.G. Swan, Vector Bundles and Projective Module, space, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Trans. American Mathematical Society, 105 (2) 264- Modern Physics, 13 (6)1650076 (2016). 277 (1962). [203] Claude Chevalley, Theory of Lie Groups, Princeton [195] Bochicchio and A. Pilloni, Gauge theories in anti- University Press, Princeton (1946), Asian Text; Over- selfdual variables, JHEP 09 39 (2013). seas Publications LTD, Tokyo (1965). [196] Y. Yu, Y-S. Wu and X. Xie, Bulk-edge correspondense, [204] J. -M. Souriau, Structure des Systèmes Dynamiques, spectral flow and Atiyah-Patodi-Singer theorem for the maitrise de mathématiques, Dunod Université, Paris Z2-invariant in topological insulators, Nucl. Phys. B (1970). 916 550-566 (2017). [205] Dietmer Ebert, Eichtheorien, Grundlage der Elemen- [197] Peter J. Braam and Pierre van Baal, Nahm’s Trans- tarteilchenphysik, VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim formation for Instantons, Commun. Math. Phys. 122, (1989). 267 (1989). [206] C.C. Aggarwal, Neural Networks and Deep Learn- [198] Pierre van Baal and Bas van den Heuvel, Zooming-in ing, Springer International Publishing A.G. part of on the SU(2) fundamntal domain, Nucl. Phys. B 417 Springer Nature (2018). 215-237 (1994). [207] T. Parcollet, M. Ravanelli, M. Morchild, G. Linar‘es, [199] Pierre van Baal and N.D. Hari Dass, The theta Depen- C. Trabelsi, R. De Mori and Y. Bengio, Quaternion Re- dence Beyond Steepest Descent, Nucl. Phys. B 385, current Neural Networks, ICLR 2019 Conference Paper 185-226 (1992). (2019). [200] Sidney Coleman, Aspects of Symmetry, Selected Erice [208] Bryce DeWitt, Supermanifolds, Cambridge Mono- Lectures, Cambridge Univ. Press (1985). graphs on mathematical physics, Cambridge Univer- [201] J.P. Morais, S. Georgiev and W. Sproessig, Real sity Press, Cambridge (1992). Quaternionic Calculus Handbook, Birkhaeuser, [209] Daniel S. Freed, Five lectures on supersymmetry, Springer Basel (2014). American Mathematical Society (1999). [202] Zi-Hua Weng, Forces in the complex octonion curved