DOCSLIB.ORG

Pentaquark and Tetraquark States Arxiv:1903.11976V2 [Hep-Ph]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pentaquark and Tetraquark States Arxiv:1903.11976V2 [Hep-Ph] Pentaquark and Tetraquark states 1 2 3 4;5 6;7;8 Yan-Rui Liu, ∗ Hua-Xing Chen, ∗ Wei Chen, ∗ Xiang Liu, y Shi-Lin Zhu z 1School of Physics, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China 2School of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China 3School of Physics, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China 4School of Physical Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China 5Research Center for Hadron and CSR Physics, Lanzhou University and Institute of Modern Physics of CAS, Lanzhou 730000, China 6School of Physics and State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China 7Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing 100871, China 8Center of High Energy Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China April 2, 2019 Abstract The past seventeen years have witnessed tremendous progress on the experimental and theo- retical explorations of the multiquark states. The hidden-charm and hidden-bottom multiquark systems were reviewed extensively in Ref. [1]. In this article, we shall update the experimental and theoretical efforts on the hidden heavy flavor multiquark systems in the past three years. Espe- cially the LHCb collaboration not only confirmed the existence of the hidden-charm pentaquarks but also provided strong evidence of the molecular picture. Besides the well-known XYZ and Pc states, we shall discuss more interesting tetraquark and pentaquark systems either with one, two, three or even four heavy quarks. Some very intriguing states include the fully heavy exotic arXiv:1903.11976v2 [hep-ph] 1 Apr 2019 tetraquark states QQQ¯Q¯ and doubly heavy tetraquark states QQq¯q¯, where Q is a heavy quark. The QQQ¯Q¯ states may be produced at LHC while the QQq¯q¯ system may be searched for at BelleII and LHCb. Moreover, we shall pay special attention to various theoretical schemes such as the chromomagnetic interaction (CMI), constituent quark model, meson exchange model, heavy quark and heavy diquark symmetry, QCD sum rules, Faddeev equation for the three body systems, Skyrme model and the chiral quark-soliton model, and the lattice QCD simulations. We shall emphasize the model-independent predictions of various models which are truly/closely related to Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). For example, the chromomagnetic interaction arises from the gluon exchange which is fundamental and universal in QCD and responsible for the mixing and mass splitting of the conventional mesons and baryons within the same multiplet. The same CMI ∗These authors equally contribute to this work. yCorresponding author: [email protected] zCorresponding author: [email protected] 1 mechanism shall also be responsible for the mixing of the different color configurations and mass splittings within the multiplets in the multiquark sector. There have also accumulated many lattice QCD simulations through multiple channel scattering on the lattice in recent years, which provide deep insights into the underlying structure/dynamics of the XYZ states. In terms of the recent Pc states, the lattice simulations of the charmed baryon and anti-charmed meson scattering are badly needed. We shall also discuss some important states which may be searched for at BESIII, BelleII and LHCb in the coming years. Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 SU(6) symmetry and Chromomagnetic interaction (CMI)9 2.1 Hamiltonian for the CMI model . 10 2.2 CMI models . 12 2.3 CMI and Conventional hadrons . 14 2.4 CMI and QQq¯ q¯ ........................................ 15 2.5 CMI and QQq¯q¯ ........................................ 18 2.6 CMI and QQQ¯Q¯ ....................................... 20 2.7 CMI and QQQ¯q¯ ........................................ 21 2.8 CMI and QQqqq¯ ....................................... 22 2.9 CMI and QQqqq¯ ....................................... 24 2.10 CMI and QQQqq¯ ....................................... 25 2.11 Mass constraints for QQq and QQQ baryons . 25 2.12 Effective CMI for multiquark states . 26 2.13 A short summary for CMI . 28 3 Constituent quark models 29 3.1 QQq¯ q¯ ............................................. 30 3.1.1 Possible quarkonium or hybrid assignments . 30 3.1.2 Schemes of the QQ¯ core admixed with coupled channels . 31 3.1.3 Tetraquark states . 32 3.2 QQq¯q¯ ............................................. 34 3.3 QQQ¯Q¯ and QQQ¯q¯ ...................................... 34 3.4 QQqqq¯ and QQqqq¯ ...................................... 35 3.5 Color flux-tube model . 36 3.6 A short summary . 38 4 Meson exchange and scattering methods 38 4.1 QQq¯ q¯ ............................................. 39 4.2 QQq¯q¯ ............................................. 41 4.3 QQqqq¯ ............................................. 41 4.4 QQqqq¯ ............................................. 44 4.5 QQQqq¯ ............................................ 44 4.6 A short summary . 45 2 5 Heavy quark symmetry and multiquark states 46 5.1 QQq¯ q¯ ............................................. 46 5.2 QQq¯q¯ ............................................. 47 5.3 QQqqq¯ and QQQqq¯ ...................................... 48 6 QCD sum rules 48 6.1 A short induction to QCD sum rules . 48 6.2 Interpolating currents and their relations to physical states . 49 6.3 QQq¯ q¯ and QQQ¯Q¯ ....................................... 52 6.4 QQq¯q¯ and QQQ¯q¯ ....................................... 54 6.5 QQqqq¯ ............................................. 55 7 Three-body system 56 7.1 A short introduction to Faddeev equations . 56 7.2 Applications of Faddeev equations to exotic hadrons . 58 7.3 Fixed center approximation . 60 8 The Skyrme model and the chiral quark-soliton model 62 8.1 A short introduction to the Skyrme model . 63 8.2 A short introduction to the chiral quark-soliton model . 66 9 Progresses from Lattice QCD 68 9.1 Y (4260) . 69 9.2 X(3872) . 71 9.3 The charged Zc states . 73 9.4 The doubly-charmed/bottom tetraquark states . 77 9.5 Other tetraquark configurations . 80 9.6 Pentaquarks . 81 9.7 A short summary for lattice QCD . 84 10 Production and decay properties 85 10.1 QQq¯ q¯ ............................................. 85 10.1.1 The X states . 85 10.1.2 The Y states . 88 10.1.3 The Zc states . 89 10.1.4 The Zb states . 91 10.2 QQq¯q¯ and QQQ¯Q¯ ....................................... 92 10.3 QQqqq¯ ............................................. 93 10.4 A short summary . 95 11 Summary and perspective 95 1 Introduction In the past decades, hadron physicists show great interest in hunting for evidences of the multiquark states. As a new form of matter beyond conventional mesons (¯qq) and baryons (qqq), multiquark states containing more than three quarks are of special importance in the hadron family. Especially, with the observations of various charmonium-like XYZ states, the study of multiquark states has entered upon a new era. 3 In this article, we will give a concise review on the research progress of the tetraquark (¯qqqq¯ ) and pentaquark (¯qqqqq) states, which are typical multiquark matters. Before doing that, let us first look back on the history of particle/hadron physics. It is well known that the development of quantum mechanics is closely related to the study of atomic spectroscopy, which reveals the mysterious veil of the atom's microstructure. Here, we find a similar situation that the study of hadron spectroscopy is bringing us new insights into the internal structure and dynamics of hadrons. In the early 1960s, many strongly interacting particles were observed in particle/nucleon experi- ments, which were named as \hadron" by L. B. Okun later [2]. Based on these observations, M. Gell- Mann and G. Zweig independently developed the classification scheme for hadrons|the quark model [3, 4,5]. Especially, the name \quark" was given by M. Gell-Mann to denote the substructure of hadrons. The quark model achieves a great success, and it is a milestone in the development of particle physics. A well-known example is the prediction of the baryon with three strange quarks, that is the Ω. It was discovered in 1964 [6] after its existence, mass, and decay products had been predicted in 1961 independently by M. Gell-Mann [7] and Y. Ne'eman [8]. Then we would like to mention the establishment of the Cornell model. In 1974, as the first state in the charmonium family, the J= was discovered by the E598 Collaboration [9] and the SLAC-SP- 017 Collaboration [10], which confirmed the existence of the charm quark [11]. After that, a series of charmonia were discovered, such as the (3686) [12], (3770) [13], (4040) [14], (4160) [15], and (4415) [16], etc. Based on these experimental observations, the Cornell model was proposed [17, 18], which uses the Cornell potential V (r) = k=r + r=a2 [19] to depict the interaction between the charm and anti-charm quarks. This potential consists− of both the Coulomb-type and linear potentials, which can well reproduce masses of the above observed charmonia at that time. Inspired by the Cornell model, various potential models were developed [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33], among which the Godfrey-Isgur model [33] is quite popular. This model contains the semi-relativistic kinetic and potential energy terms, which can be applied to quantitatively describe not only meson spectra [33] but also baryon spectra [34]. These phenomenological models, inspired by the charmonium family, greatly improve our understanding of the internal structure and dynamics of conventional mesons and baryons. Nowadays several hundreds of hadrons have been observed in particle experiments, most of which
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LHC Explore Pentaquark
    LHC Explore Pentaquark Scientists at the Large Hadron Collider have announced the discovery of a new particle called the pentaquark. [9] CERN scientists just completed one of the most exciting upgrades on the Large Hadron Collider—the Di-Jet Calorimeter (DCal). [8] As physicists were testing the repairs of LHC by zipping a few spare protons around the 17 mile loop, the CMS detector picked up something unusual. The team feverishly pored over the data, and ultimately came to an unlikely conclusion—in their tests, they had accidentally created a rainbow universe. [7] The universe may have existed forever, according to a new model that applies quantum correction terms to complement Einstein's theory of general relativity. The model may also account for dark matter and dark energy, resolving multiple problems at once. [6] This paper explains the Accelerating Universe, the Special and General Relativity from the observed effects of the accelerating electrons, causing naturally the experienced changes of the electric field potential along the moving electric charges. The accelerating electrons explain not only the Maxwell Equations and the Special Relativity, but the Heisenberg Uncertainty Relation, the wave particle duality and the electron’s spin also, building the bridge between the Classical and Relativistic Quantum Theories. The Big Bang caused acceleration created the radial currents of the matter and since the matter composed of negative and positive charges, these currents are creating magnetic field and attracting forces between the parallel moving electric currents. This is the gravitational force experienced by the matter, and also the mass is result of the electromagnetic forces between the charged particles.
    [Show full text]
  • Pentaquark Search Shows How Science Moves Forward
    Although initial results were encouraging, physicists searching for an exotic five-quark particle now think it probably doesn’t exist. The debate over the pentaquark search shows how science moves forward. The rise and fall of the PE NTAQUAR K by Kandice Carter, Jefferson Lab 16 Three years ago, research teams around the stars are made. Yet he and his peers had no world announced they had found data hinting at means to verify its existence. the existence of an exotic particle containing Luminaries of 16th-19th century physics, five quarks, more than ever observed in any other including Newton, Fresnel, Stokes, and Maxwell, quark-composite particle. More than two dozen debated at length the properties of their physi- experiments have since taken aim at the particle, cal version of the philosophical concept, which dubbed the pentaquark, and its possible partners, they called ether. in the quest to turn a hint into a discovery. It’s a The ether was a way to explain how light scenario that often plays out in science: an early could travel through empty space. In 1881, theory or observation points to a potentially Albert A. Michelson began to explore the ether important discovery, and experimenters race to concept with experimental tools. But his first corroborate or to refute the idea. experiments, which seemed to rule out the “Research is the process of going up alleys to existence of the ether, were later realized to be see if they are blind,” said Marston Bates, a zool- inconclusive. ogist whose research on mosquitoes led to Six years later, Michelson paired up with an understanding of how yellow fever is spread.
    [Show full text]
  • (2380) in a Hexaquark Scenario
    Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Quarks and Nuclear Physics (QNP2018) Downloaded from journals.jps.jp by Deutsches Elek Synchrotron on 11/15/19 Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Quarks and Nuclear Physics (QNP2018) JPS Conf. Proc. 26, 022016 (2019) https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSCP.26.022016 The Properties of d∗(2380) in a Hexaquark Scenario Yubing Dong1;2;3;y, Pengnian Shen1;4, Fei Huang2, and Zongye Zhang1;2;3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 2 School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China 3 Theoretical Physics Center for Science Facilities (TPCSF), CAS, Beijing 100049, China 4 College of Physics and Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China E-mail: [email protected] (Received January 5, 2019) The properties of the newly observed dibaryon resonance d∗(2380) (IJ p = 03+), calculated in a constituent chiral quark model, are briefly reported. Comparing to the available experimental data for its decays, we conclude that the resonance d∗(2380) can be reasonably interpreted as a compact heaxquark dominant state. KEYWORDS: d∗(2380), dibaryon, chiral constituent quark model, hexaquark 1. Introduction The history of the studies of dibaryon systems, like d∗, d0 and H particles, can be traced back to about half century ago (see the review article of Clement [1]). The clear experimental evidence for the d∗ was not observed until 2009. They were the CELSIUS/WASA and WASA@COSY collaborations, who carried out the study of ABC effect [2–5], and found that their measurements cannot be simply explained by the contribution either from the intermediate Roper excitation or from the t-channel ∆∆ contribution, except introducing an intermediate new resonance.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2012.15102V2 [Hep-Ph] 13 May 2021 T > Tc
    Confinement of Fermions in Tachyon Matter at Finite Temperature Adamu Issifu,1, ∗ Julio C.M. Rocha,1, y and Francisco A. Brito1, 2, z 1Departamento de F´ısica, Universidade Federal da Para´ıba, Caixa Postal 5008, 58051-970 Jo~aoPessoa, Para´ıba, Brazil 2Departamento de F´ısica, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande Caixa Postal 10071, 58429-900 Campina Grande, Para´ıba, Brazil We study a phenomenological model that mimics the characteristics of QCD theory at finite temperature. The model involves fermions coupled with a modified Abelian gauge field in a tachyon matter. It reproduces some important QCD features such as, confinement, deconfinement, chiral symmetry and quark-gluon-plasma (QGP) phase transitions. The study may shed light on both light and heavy quark potentials and their string tensions. Flux-tube and Cornell potentials are developed depending on the regime under consideration. Other confining properties such as scalar glueball mass, gluon mass, glueball-meson mixing states, gluon and chiral condensates are exploited as well. The study is focused on two possible regimes, the ultraviolet (UV) and the infrared (IR) regimes. I. INTRODUCTION Confinement of heavy quark states QQ¯ is an important subject in both theoretical and experimental study of high temperature QCD matter and quark-gluon-plasma phase (QGP) [1]. The production of heavy quarkonia such as the fundamental state ofcc ¯ in the Relativistic Heavy Iron Collider (RHIC) [2] and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) [3] provides basics for the study of QGP. Lattice QCD simulations of quarkonium at finite temperature indicates that J= may persists even at T = 1:5Tc [4] i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Diffractive Dissociation of Alpha Particles As a Test of Isophobic Short-Range Correlations Inside Nuclei ∗ Jennifer Rittenhouse West A, , Stanley J
    Physics Letters B 805 (2020) 135423 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physics Letters B www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb Diffractive dissociation of alpha particles as a test of isophobic short-range correlations inside nuclei ∗ Jennifer Rittenhouse West a, , Stanley J. Brodsky a, Guy F. de Téramond b, Iván Schmidt c a SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309, USA b Laboratorio de Física Teórica y Computacional, Universidad de Costa Rica, 11501 San José, Costa Rica c Departamento de Física y Centro Científico Tecnológico de Valparáiso-CCTVal, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Casilla 110-V, Valparaíso, Chile a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: The CLAS collaboration at Jefferson Laboratory has compared nuclear parton distributions for a range Received 15 January 2020 of nuclear targets and found that the EMC effect measured in deep inelastic lepton-nucleus scattering Received in revised form 9 April 2020 has a strongly “isophobic” nature. This surprising observation suggests short-range correlations between Accepted 9 April 2020 neighboring n and p nucleons in nuclear wavefunctions that are much stronger compared to p − p or n − Available online 14 April 2020 n correlations. In this paper we propose a definitive experimental test of the nucleon-nucleon explanation Editor: W. Haxton of the isophobic nature of the EMC effect: the diffractive dissociation on a nuclear target A of high energy 4 He nuclei to pairs of nucleons n and p with high relative transverse momentum, α + A → n + p + A + X. The comparison of n − p events with p − p and n − n events directly tests the postulated breaking of isospin symmetry.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Field Theories for Quarkonium
    Effective Field Theories for Quarkonium recent progress Antonio Vairo Technische Universitat¨ Munchen¨ Outline 1. Scales and EFTs for quarkonium at zero and finite temperature 2.1 Static energy at zero temperature 2.2 Charmonium radiative transitions 2.3 Bottomoniun thermal width 3. Conclusions Scales and EFTs Scales Quarkonia, i.e. heavy quark-antiquark bound states, are systems characterized by hierarchies of energy scales. These hierarchies allow systematic studies. They follow from the quark mass M being the largest scale in the system: • M ≫ p • M ≫ ΛQCD • M ≫ T ≫ other thermal scales The non-relativistic expansion • M ≫ p implies that quarkonia are non-relativistic and characterized by the hierarchy of scales typical of a non-relativistic bound state: M ≫ p ∼ 1/r ∼ Mv ≫ E ∼ Mv2 The hierarchy of non-relativistic scales makes the very difference of quarkonia with heavy-light mesons, which are just characterized by the two scales M and ΛQCD. Systematic expansions in the small heavy-quark velocity v may be implemented at the Lagrangian level by constructing suitable effective field theories (EFTs). ◦ Brambilla Pineda Soto Vairo RMP 77 (2004) 1423 Non-relativistic Effective Field Theories LONG−RANGE SHORT−RANGE Caswell Lepage PLB 167(86)437 QUARKONIUM QUARKONIUM / QED ◦ ◦ Lepage Thacker NP PS 4(88)199 QCD/QED ◦ Bodwin et al PRD 51(95)1125, ... M perturbative matching perturbative matching ◦ Pineda Soto PLB 420(98)391 µ ◦ Pineda Soto NP PS 64(98)428 ◦ Brambilla et al PRD 60(99)091502 Mv NRQCD/NRQED ◦ Brambilla et al NPB 566(00)275 ◦ Kniehl et al NPB 563(99)200 µ ◦ Luke Manohar PRD 55(97)4129 ◦ Luke Savage PRD 57(98)413 2 non−perturbative perturbative matching Mv matching ◦ Grinstein Rothstein PRD 57(98)78 ◦ Labelle PRD 58(98)093013 ◦ Griesshammer NPB 579(00)313 pNRQCD/pNRQED ◦ Luke et al PRD 61(00)074025 ◦ Hoang Stewart PRD 67(03)114020, ..
    [Show full text]
  • Supersymmetric and Conformal Features of Hadron Physics
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 16 October 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201810.0364.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Universe 2018, 4, 120; doi:10.3390/universe4110120 Supersymmetric and Conformal Features of Hadron Physics Stanley J. Brodsky1;a 1SLAC National Accelerator Center, Stanford University Stanford, California Abstract. The QCD Lagrangian is based on quark and gluonic fields – not squarks nor gluinos. However, one can show that its hadronic eigensolutions conform to a repre- sentation of superconformal algebra, reflecting the underlying conformal symmetry of chiral QCD. The eigensolutions of superconformal algebra provide a unified Regge spec- troscopy of meson, baryon, and tetraquarks of the same parity and twist as equal-mass members of the same 4-plet representation with a universal Regge slope. The predictions from light-front holography and superconformal algebra can also be extended to mesons, baryons, and tetraquarks with strange, charm and bottom quarks. The pion qq¯ eigenstate has zero mass for mq = 0: A key tool is the remarkable observation of de Alfaro, Fubini, and Furlan (dAFF) which shows how a mass scale can appear in the Hamiltonian and the equations of motion while retaining the conformal symmetry of the action. When one applies the dAFF procedure to chiral QCD, a mass scale κ appears which determines universal Regge slopes, hadron masses in the absence of the Higgs coupling. One also 2 −Q2=4κ2 predicts the form of the nonperturbative QCD running coupling: αs(Q ) / e , in agreement with the effective charge determined from measurements of the Bjorken sum rule. One also obtains viable predictions for spacelike and timelike hadronic form factors, structure functions, distribution amplitudes, and transverse momentum distributions.
    [Show full text]
  • Fully Strange Tetraquark Sss¯S¯ Spectrum and Possible Experimental Evidence
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 103, 016016 (2021) Fully strange tetraquark sss¯s¯ spectrum and possible experimental evidence † Feng-Xiao Liu ,1,2 Ming-Sheng Liu,1,2 Xian-Hui Zhong,1,2,* and Qiang Zhao3,4,2, 1Department of Physics, Hunan Normal University, and Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control of Ministry of Education, Changsha 410081, China 2Synergetic Innovation Center for Quantum Effects and Applications (SICQEA), Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China 3Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 4University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China (Received 21 August 2020; accepted 5 January 2021; published 26 January 2021) In this work, we construct 36 tetraquark configurations for the 1S-, 1P-, and 2S-wave states, and make a prediction of the mass spectrum for the tetraquark sss¯s¯ system in the framework of a nonrelativistic potential quark model without the diquark-antidiquark approximation. The model parameters are well determined by our previous study of the strangeonium spectrum. We find that the resonances f0ð2200Þ and 2340 2218 2378 f2ð Þ may favor the assignments of ground states Tðsss¯s¯Þ0þþ ð Þ and Tðsss¯s¯Þ2þþ ð Þ, respectively, and the newly observed Xð2500Þ at BESIII may be a candidate of the lowest mass 1P-wave 0−þ state − 2481 0þþ 2440 Tðsss¯s¯Þ0 þ ð Þ. Signals for the other ground state Tðsss¯s¯Þ0þþ ð Þ may also have been observed in PC −− the ϕϕ invariant mass spectrum in J=ψ → γϕϕ at BESIII. The masses of the J ¼ 1 Tsss¯s¯ states are predicted to be in the range of ∼2.44–2.99 GeV, which indicates that the ϕð2170Þ resonance may not be a good candidate of the Tsss¯s¯ state.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarkonium Interactions in QCD1
    CERN-TH/95-342 BI-TP 95/41 Quarkonium Interactions in QCD1 D. KHARZEEV Theory Division, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland and Fakult¨at f¨ur Physik, Universit¨at Bielefeld, D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1.1 Preview 1.2 QCD atoms in external fields 2. Operator Product Expansion for Quarkonium Interactions 2.1 General idea 2.2 Wilson coefficients 2.3 Sum rules 2.4 Absorption cross sections 3. Scale Anomaly, Chiral Symmetry and Low-Energy Theorems 3.1 Scale anomaly and quarkonium interactions 3.2 Low energy theorem for quarkonium interactions with pions 3.3 The phase of the scattering amplitude 4. Quarkonium Interactions in Matter 4.1 Nuclear matter 4.2 Hadron gas 4.3 Deconfined matter 5. Conclusions and Outlook 1Presented at the Enrico Fermi International School of Physics on “Selected Topics in Non-Perturbative QCD”, Varenna, Italy, June 1995; to appear in the Proceedings. 1 Introduction 1.1 Preview Heavy quarkonia have proved to be extremely useful for understanding QCD. The large mass of heavy quarks allows a perturbation theory analysis of quarkonium decays [1] (see [2] for a recent review). Perturbation theory also provides a rea- sonable first approximation to the correlation functions of quarkonium currents; deviations from the predictions of perturbation theory can therefore be used to infer an information about the nature of non-perturbative effects. This program was first realized at the end of the seventies [3]; it turned out to be one of the first steps towards a quantitative understanding of the QCD vacuum. The natural next step is to use heavy quarkonia to probe the properties of excited QCD vacuum, which may be produced in relativistic heavy ion collisions; this was proposed a decade ago [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(LATTICE2014)106 ∗ [email protected] Speaker
    Flavored tetraquark spectroscopy PoS(LATTICE2014)106 Andrea L. Guerrieri∗ Dipartimento di Fisica and INFN, Università di Roma ’Tor Vergata’ Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, I-00133 Roma, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Mauro Papinutto, Alessandro Pilloni, Antonio D. Polosa Dipartimento di Fisica and INFN, ’Sapienza’ Università di Roma P.le Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Roma, Italy Nazario Tantalo CERN, PH-TH, Geneva, Switzerland and Dipartimento di Fisica and INFN, Università di Roma ’Tor Vergata’ Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, I-00133 Roma, Italy The recent confirmation of the charged charmonium like resonance Z(4430) by the LHCb ex- periment strongly suggests the existence of QCD multi quark bound states. Some preliminary results about hypothetical flavored tetraquark mesons are reported. Such states are particularly amenable to Lattice QCD studies as their interpolating operators do not overlap with those of ordinary hidden-charm mesons. The 32nd International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, 23-28 June, 2014 Columbia University New York, NY ∗Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/ Flavored tetraquark spectroscopy Andrea L. Guerrieri 1. Introduction The recent confirmation of the charged resonant state Z(4430) by LHCb [1] strongly suggests the existence of genuine compact tetraquark mesons in the QCD spectrum. Among the many phenomenological models, it seems that only the diquark-antidiquark model in its type-II version can accomodate in a unified description the puzzling spectrum of the exotics [2]. Although diquark- antidiquark model has success in describing the observed exotic spectrum, it also predicts a number of unobserved exotic partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics Letters B 816 (2021) 136227
    Physics Letters B 816 (2021) 136227 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physics Letters B www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb Scalar isoscalar mesons and the scalar glueball from radiative J/ψ decays ∗ A.V. Sarantsev a,b, I. Denisenko c, U. Thoma a, E. Klempt a, a Helmholtz–Institut für Strahlen– und Kernphysik, Universität Bonn, Germany b NRC “Kurchatov Institute”, PNPI, Gatchina 188300, Russia c Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Joliot-Curie 6, 141980 Dubna, Moscow region, Russia a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t ¯ Article history: A coupled-channel analysis of BESIII data on radiative J/ψ decays into ππ, K K , ηη and ωφ has been Received 12 January 2021 performed. The partial-wave amplitude is constrained by a large number of further data. The analysis Received in revised form 16 March 2021 finds ten isoscalar scalar mesons. Their masses, widths and decay modes are determined. The scalar Accepted 16 March 2021 mesons are interpreted as mainly SU(3)-singlet and mainly octet states. Octet isoscalar scalar states Available online xxxx are observed with significant yields only in the 1500-2100 MeV mass region. Singlet scalar mesons are Editor: M. Doser produced over a wide mass range but their yield peaks in the same mass region. The peak is interpreted = ± +10 = ± +30 as scalar glueball. Its mass and width are determined to M 1865 25−30 MeV and 370 50−20 MeV, − its yield in radiative J/ψ decays to (5.8 ± 1.0) 10 3. © 2021 The Author(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the J/Psi Production Mechanism at PHENIX Todd Kempel Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2010 Understanding the J/psi Production Mechanism at PHENIX Todd Kempel Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Physics Commons Recommended Citation Kempel, Todd, "Understanding the J/psi Production Mechanism at PHENIX" (2010). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 11649. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/11649 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Understanding the J= Production Mechanism at PHENIX by Todd Kempel A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Nuclear Physics Program of Study Committee: John G. Lajoie, Major Professor Kevin L De Laplante S¨orenA. Prell J¨orgSchmalian Kirill Tuchin Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2010 Copyright c Todd Kempel, 2010. All rights reserved. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES . v LIST OF FIGURES . vii CHAPTER 1. Overview . 1 CHAPTER 2. Quantum Chromodynamics . 3 2.1 The Standard Model . 3 2.2 Quarks and Gluons . 5 2.3 Asymptotic Freedom and Confinement . 6 CHAPTER 3. The Proton . 8 3.1 Cross-Sections and Luminosities . 8 3.2 Deep-Inelastic Scattering . 10 3.3 Structure Functions and Bjorken Scaling . 12 3.4 Altarelli-Parisi Evolution .
    [Show full text]