DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 35 / Wednesday. February 21, 1990 / Proposed Rules

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 35 / Wednesday. February 21, 1990 / Proposed Rules 6184 Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 35 / Wednesday. February 21, 1990 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Region 1. California, Hawaii. Idaho. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Nevada, Oregon. Washington. Background Fish and Wildlife Service Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana The Endangered Species Act of 1973, Islands, and Pacific Territories of the 50 CFR Part 17 as amended (Act). requires the Service United States. to identify species of wildlife and plants Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Regional Director (FWE—SE). U.S. Fish that are endangered or threatened. and Plants; Review of Plant Taxa for and Wildlife Service. 1002 NE. Holladay based on the best available scientific Listing as Endangered or Threatened Street. Portland. Oregon 97232—4181. and commercial data. The Act directed Species (503/231—6150or FTS 429—6150). the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution to prepare a report on AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 2. Arizona. New Mexico. endangered and threatened plant Interior. Oklahoma. and Texas. species, which was published as House Regional Director (FWE—SE). U.S. Fish ACTION: Notice of review. Document No. 94—51. The Service and Wildlife Service. P.O. Box 1306, published a notice on July 1. 1975 (40 FR SUMMARY: In this notice the Service Albuquerque. New Mexico 87103, (505/ 27823). in which it announced that more presents an updated compilation of 766—2321 or FTS 474—2321). than 3.000 native plant taxa named in vascular plant taxa native to the United Region 3. Illinois, Indiana, Iowa. the Smithsonian’s report and other taxa States that are being reviewed for Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri. Ohio. added by the 1975 notice would be possible addition to the List of and Wisconsin. reviewed for possible inclusion in the Endangered and Threatened Plants Regional Director (AE/SE), U.S. Fish List of Endangered and Threatened under the Endangered Species Act of and Wildlife Service, Federal Building, Plants. The 1975 notice was superseded 1973, as amended (Act). Such taxa are Fort Snelling, Twin Cities, Minnesota on December 15, 1980 (45 FR 82479), by a generally referred to as listing 55111, (612/725—3276 or FTS 725—3276). new comprehensive notice of review for candidates. The changes in this native plants that took into account the document from previous notices of Region 4. Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, earlier Smithsonian report and other review primarily involve: (1) The Georgia. Kentucky, Louisiana, accumulated information. On November addition of taxa: (2) changes in category Mississippi. North Carolina, South 28, 1983 (48 FR 53640), a supplemental for some candidates: (3) the omission of Carolina, Tennessee, Puerto Rico, and plant notice of review noted changes in taxa that have been listed under the Act: the U.S. Virgin Islands. the status of various taxa. A complete (4) the deletion of taxa identified as non- Regional Director (FWE), U.S. Fish update of the plant notice was published candidates in previous notices: and (5) and Wildlife Service, The Richard B. on September 27, 1985 (50 FR 39526). All additions and deletions in State Russell Federal Building, Suite 1276, 75 previous plant notices of review are distributions. While it is prudent to take Spring Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia superseded by the current revised candidate taxa into account during 30303, (404/331—3583 or FTS 841—3583). notice. environmental planning, none of the Region 5. Connecticut, Delaware, Current Notice substantive or procedural provisions of District of Columbia, Maine. Maryland. the Act apply to a species that is Massachusetts. New Hampshire. New This notice reflects the Service’s designated as a candidate for listing. Jersey, New York, Pennsy1va~iia,Rhode current judgment of the possible Through the publication of this notice, Island. Vermont, Virginia, and West vulnerability of native plant taxa. Taxa in the notice are assigned to several the Service also requests any additional Virginia. status categories, noted in the status information that may be Regional Director (FWE). U.S. Fish “Category” column at the left side of the available. This information will be and Wildlife Service, Suite 700, One considered in preparing listing table. As in the 1985 plant notice, all Gateway Center, Newton Corner. taxa are listed in one table, with coded documents and future revisions and/or Massachusetts 02158, (617/965—5100. ext. supplements to the notice of review. It entries to indicate current status. Plant 316 or FTS 829—9316. taxa that have been added to theLists will also assist the Service in monitoring Region 6. Colorado, Kansas, Montana, changes in the status of listing of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Nebraska. North Dakota. South Dakota. and Plants (Lists) at 50 CFR 17.12 are no candidates. Utah. and Wyoming. longer candidate notice of review DATES: Comments are requested until Regional Director (FWE), U.S. Fish subjects. The latest reprinting of the the publication of an update of this and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 25486, Lists (currently January 1, 1989) is notice, anticipated in early 1992. Denver Federal Center. Denver. available from the Service. Former plant ADDRESSES: Interested persons or Colorado 80225. (303/236—7398 or FTS candidates that have been identified in organizations should submit comments 776—7398). previous notices in categories 3B or 3C to the appropriate Regional Director(s) Region 7. Alaska. (see definitions below) are not repeated below or to: Chief, Division of here, except in cases where new Endangered Species and Habitat Regional Director (FWE), U.S. Fish synonomies have been identified. For and Wildlife Service, 1101 East Tudor example. certain Hawaiian taxa Conservation, 400 Arlington Square. U.S. Road, Anchorage. Alaska 99503. (907/ Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, previously identifed in category 3C now 786—3505 or FTS 907/786—3505). DC 20240. Comments and materials incorporate other taxa previously relating to this notice are available for FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: identified in categories 1. 2. or 3B (see public inspection by appointment in the Endangered Species Coordinator(s) in Manual of the Flowering Plants of Regional Offices listed below. the appropriate Regional Office(s). or Hawaii, University of Hawaii Press, in Information relating to particular taxa in Dr. Janet E. Hohn, Chief, Branch of Press). this notice can be obtained from the Endangered Species Listing and Codes for the major categories of taxa Service’s Endangered Species Recovery. U.S. Fish and Wildlife in the new notice are explained below: Coordinator(s) in the appropriate Service, Washington. DC 20240, (703/ PE—Taxa already proposed to be Regional Office(s) listed ~below: 356—2171 or FTS 921—2171). listed as endangered. Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 21, 1990 / Proposed Rules 6185 PT—Taxa already proposed to be 3B—Names that. on the basis of status, it was also-accepted as a listing listed as threatened. current taxonomic understanding petition. S—Synonyms. (usually as represented in published The 1982 amendments to the Act 1—Taxa for which the Service has on revisions and monographs), do not required specific and timely responses file enough substantial information on represent distinct taxa meeting the Act’s to listing petitions. In particular. section biological vulnerability and threat(s) to definition of “species.” Such supposed 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act was amended to support proposals to list them as taxa could be reevaluated in the future require a finding within one year of endangered or threatened species. on the basis of new information. receiving a listing petition as to whether Development and publication of 3C—Taxa that have proven to be the listing is (1) warranted (if so, the proposed rules on these taxa are more abundant or widespread than finding is accompanied by publication of anticipated; however, because of the previously believed and/or those that a proposed listing rule), (2) warranted large number of category I taxa, it will are not subject to any identifiable but precluded by other pending take several years to clear the backlog. threat. If further research or changes in proposals of higher priority, or (3) not Also included in category 1 are taxa habitat indicate a significant decline in warranted. In the case of a “warranted of known vulnerable status in the recent any of these taxa, they may be but precluded” finding, another finding past that may already have become reevaluated for possible inclusion in is required one year later, again falling extinct. These plants retain a high categories I or 2. into one of the three allowable classes. priority for addition to the List, if extant .The taxa in categories I and 2 of this The cycle then repeats each year until populations are confirmed. Such notice are considered by the Service as petitioned taxa are either proposed for possibly extinct taxa are indicated by candidates for possible addition to the listing or a final “not warranted” finding an asterisk (*). Double asterisks (**) List of Endangered and Threatened is made. After the 1982 amendments, for indicate taxa believed to be extinct in Plants. The Service encourages their the purpose of making annually recycled the wild but known to be extant in consideration in environmental findings, the Service made an cultivation. administrative decision to treat all 2—Taxa for which there is some planning, such as in environmental impact analysis under the National candidate species of plants as if their evidence of vulnerability, but for which listings had been petitioned prior to there are not enough data to support Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (implemented at 40 CFR parts 1500— 1982. This action was taken in order to listing proposals at this time. Again, 1508). Information regarding the range, avoid the necessity of keeping separate taxa that are possibly extinct are track of, and annually making individual indicated by an asterisk (*) and those status, and habitat needs of such species findings on, the several thousand that are known to exist only in is available from the Service’s Regional cultivation are marked by double Offices (see “ADDRESSES” above).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maine State Legislature
    MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from scanned originals with text recognition applied (searchable text may contain some errors and/or omissions) F 27 ,P5 B323 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. DIRECTOR'S 1992 SUMMARY B. OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS AND OVERVIEW I OVERVIEW II PUBLIC RELATIONS III SAFETY IV NEW CONSTRUCTION V MAINTENANCE VI TRAINING VII SEARCH & RESCUE VIII LAW ENFORCEMENT IX SPECIAL ACTIVITIES X PROJECTION OF MAJOR P~OJECTS FOR 1993-1994 XI 1992 BSP VOLUNTEER PROGRAM XII ANNUAL REPORT WILDLIFE REPORT C. SCIENFIC FOREST MANAGEMENT AREA I FOREST ISSUES AND ADMINISTRATION II FOREST EDUCATION III PUBLIC RELATIONS IV FOREST OPERATIONS V OTHER ACTIVITIES D. INFORMATION/EDUCATION I PUBLIC PROGRAMS II EXCHANGE & PROFESSIONAL ENRICHMENT III PARK USE COMMITTEE - 1992 PROGRESS IV MT. PATROL V 1992 LOON AUDUBON LOON COUNT VI SUMMER INFORMATION/EDUCATION INTERN VII RESERVATION OFFICE VIII INFORMATION BOOTH IX OTHER NOTES FROM 1992 X RESEARCH XI LONG-TERM STUDIES E. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES I PERSONNEL CHANGES II TRAINING III CONTRACT SERVICES IV SUPPLY V DONATION ACCOUNT VI STATISTICAL REPORT VII PERSONNEL LISTING a. ORGANIZATION CHART b. YEAR ROUND c. SEASONAL F. FINANCIAL REPORTS G. DIRECTOR'S CONCLUDING REMARKS H. APPENDIX I AUTHORITY/ADVISORY LISTING/SUB-COMMITTEES II DIRECTOR'S COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE III HARPSWELL COMMITTEE IV SCIENTIFIC FOREST MANAGEMENT AREA V SCIENTIFIC STUDY REVIEW COMMITTEE VI DIRECTOR'S STATEMENT ON LOW LEVEL FLIGHTS VII TOGUE POND PURCHASE CONTRACT OF SALE VIII 1992 AUDIT LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION A, DIRECTOR'S 1992 SUMMARY Irvin C.
    [Show full text]
  • (Leguminosae): Nomenclatural Proposals and New Taxa
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 58 Number 1 Article 5 1-30-1998 Astragalus (Leguminosae): nomenclatural proposals and new taxa Stanley L. Welsh Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Welsh, Stanley L. (1998) "Astragalus (Leguminosae): nomenclatural proposals and new taxa," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 58 : No. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol58/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Great Basin Naturalist 58(1), © 1998, pp. 45-53 ASTRAGALUS (LEGUMINOSAE): NOMENCLATURAL PROPOSALS AND NEW TAXA Stanley L. Welsh! ABSTRACT.-As part of an ongoing summary revision of Astragalus for the Flora North America project, several nomenclatural changes are indicated. Nomenclatural proposals include A. molybdenus val'. shultziorom (Barneby) Welsh, comb. nov.; A. australis var. aboriginorom (Richardson) Welsh, comb. nov.; A. australis var. cattoni (M.E. Jones) Welsh, comb. nov.; A. aU8tralis var. lepagei (Hulten) Welsh, comb. nov; A. australis var. muriei (Hulten) Welsh, comb. nov.; A. subcinereus var. sileranus (M.E. Jones) Welsh, comb. nov.; A. tegetariaides val'. anxius (Meinke & Kaye) Welsh, comb. nov.; A. ampullarioides (Welsh) Welsh, comb. nov.; A. cutlen (Barneby) Welsh, comb. nov.; and A. laccaliticus (M.E. Jones) Welsh, comb. nov. Proposals of new taxa include Astragalus sect. Scytocarpi subsect. Micl'ocymbi Welsh, subsed. nov., and A. sabulosus var.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument
    Schmidt, Drost, Halvorson In Cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument Plant and Vertebrate Vascular U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center 2255 N. Gemini Drive Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Open-File Report 2006-1163 Southwest Biological Science Center Open-File Report 2006-1163 November 2006 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Park Service In cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument By Cecilia A. Schmidt, Charles A. Drost, and William L. Halvorson Open-File Report 2006-1163 November, 2006 USGS Southwest Biological Science Center Sonoran Desert Research Station University of Arizona U.S. Department of the Interior School of Natural Resources U.S. Geological Survey 125 Biological Sciences East National Park Service Tucson, Arizona 85721 U.S. Department of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 Note: This document contains information of a preliminary nature and was prepared primarily for internal use in the U.S. Geological Survey. This information is NOT intended for use in open literature prior to publication by the investigators named unless permission is obtained in writing from the investigators named and from the Station Leader. Suggested Citation Schmidt, C. A., C. A. Drost, and W. L. Halvorson 2006. Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument. USGS Open-File Report 2006-1163.
    [Show full text]
  • Research and Sponsored Programs Records (University of Maine), 1978-2013
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Finding Aids Special Collections 2016 Research and Sponsored Programs Records (University of Maine), 1978-2013 Special Collections, Raymond H. Fogler Library, University of Maine Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/findingaids Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Special Collections, Raymond H. Fogler Library, University of Maine, "Research and Sponsored Programs Records (University of Maine), 1978-2013" (2016). Finding Aids. Number 317. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/findingaids/317 This Finding Aid is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Collections at DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Finding Aids by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact Special Collections, Fogler Library, 207-581-1686 or [email protected]. Research and Sponsored Programs Records (University of Maine) This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on February 25, 2020. Finding aid written in English. Describing Archives: A Content Standard Raymond H. Fogler Library University Archives 5729 Raymond H. Fogler Library University of Maine Orono, ME 04469-5729 URL: http://www.library.umaine.edu/speccoll Research and Sponsored Programs Records (University of Maine) Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 4 Historical Note ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Maine's Endangered and Threatened Plants
    University of Southern Maine USM Digital Commons Maine Collection 1990 Maine's Endangered and Threatened Plants Maine State Planning Office Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/me_collection Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Botany Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Forest Biology Commons, Forest Management Commons, Other Forestry and Forest Sciences Commons, Plant Biology Commons, and the Weed Science Commons Recommended Citation Maine State Planning Office, "Maine's Endangered and Threatened Plants" (1990). Maine Collection. 49. https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/me_collection/49 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by USM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine Collection by an authorized administrator of USM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BACKGROUND and PURPOSE In an effort to encourage the protection of native Maine plants that are naturally reduced or low in number, the State Planning Office has compiled a list of endangered and threatened plants. Of Maine's approximately 1500 native vascular plant species, 155, or about 10%, are included on the Official List of Maine's Plants that are Endangered or Threatened. Of the species on the list, three are also listed at the federal level. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. has des·ignated the Furbish's Lousewort (Pedicularis furbishiae) and Small Whorled Pogonia (lsotria medeoloides) as Endangered species and the Prairie White-fringed Orchid (Platanthera leucophaea) as Threatened. Listing rare plants of a particular state or region is a process rather than an isolated and finite event.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Coefficient of Conservatism
    Coefficient of Coefficient of Scientific Name Common Name Nativity Conservatism Wetness Abies balsamea balsam fir native 3 0 Abies concolor white fir non‐native 0 Abutilon theophrasti velvetleaf non‐native 0 3 Acalypha rhomboidea common threeseed mercury native 2 3 Acer ginnala Amur maple non‐native 0 Acer negundo boxelder non‐native 0 0 Acer pensylvanicum striped maple native 5 3 Acer platanoides Norway maple non‐native 0 5 Acer pseudoplatanus sycamore maple non‐native 0 Acer rubrum red maple native 2 0 Acer saccharinum silver maple native 6 ‐3 Acer saccharum sugar maple native 5 3 Acer spicatum mountain maple native 6 3 Acer x freemanii red maple x silver maple native 2 0 Achillea millefolium common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. borealis common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. millefolium common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. occidentalis common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea ptarmica sneezeweed non‐native 0 3 Acinos arvensis basil thyme non‐native 0 Aconitum napellus Venus' chariot non‐native 0 Acorus americanus sweetflag native 6 ‐5 Acorus calamus calamus native 6 ‐5 Actaea pachypoda white baneberry native 7 5 Actaea racemosa black baneberry non‐native 0 Actaea rubra red baneberry native 7 3 Actinidia arguta tara vine non‐native 0 Adiantum aleuticum Aleutian maidenhair native 9 3 Adiantum pedatum northern maidenhair native 8 3 Adlumia fungosa allegheny vine native 7 Aegopodium podagraria bishop's goutweed non‐native 0 0 Coefficient of Coefficient of Scientific Name Common Name Nativity
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogenetic Study in Carex Section Ovales (Cyperaceae) Using AFLP Data Andrew L
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 23 | Issue 1 Article 14 2007 Chromosome Number Changes Associated with Speciation in Sedges: a Phylogenetic Study in Carex section Ovales (Cyperaceae) Using AFLP Data Andrew L. Hipp University of Wisconsin, Madison Paul E. Rothrock Taylor University, Upland, Indiana Anton A. Reznicek University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Paul E. Berry University of Wisconsin, Madison Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Hipp, Andrew L.; Rothrock, Paul E.; Reznicek, Anton A.; and Berry, Paul E. (2007) "Chromosome Number Changes Associated with Speciation in Sedges: a Phylogenetic Study in Carex section Ovales (Cyperaceae) Using AFLP Data," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 23: Iss. 1, Article 14. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol23/iss1/14 Aliso 23, pp. 193–203 ᭧ 2007, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden CHROMOSOME NUMBER CHANGES ASSOCIATED WITH SPECIATION IN SEDGES: A PHYLOGENETIC STUDY IN CAREX SECTION OVALES (CYPERACEAE) USING AFLP DATA ANDREW L. HIPP,1,4,5 PAUL E. ROTHROCK,2 ANTON A. REZNICEK,3 AND PAUL E. BERRY1,6 1University of Wisconsin, Madison, Department of Botany, 430 Lincoln Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA; 2Taylor University, Randall Environmental Studies Center, Upland, Indiana 46989-1001, USA; 3University of Michigan Herbarium, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 3600 Varsity Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108-2287, USA 4Corresponding author ([email protected]) ABSTRACT Phylogenetic analysis of amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP) was used to infer pat- terns of morphologic and chromosomal evolution in an eastern North American group of sedges (ENA clade I of Carex sect.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Plant Diversity in New England
    CONSERVING PLANT DIVERSITY IN NEW ENGLAND A COLLABORATION OF CONSERVING PLANT DIVERSITY IN NEW ENGLAND A COLLABORATION OF AUTHORS Mark Anderson Director of Conservation Science, Eastern United States, The Nature Conservancy Michael Piantedosi Director of Conservation, Native Plant Trust William Brumback Director of Conservation Emeritus, Native Plant Trust MAP PRODUCTION Arlene Olivero WEB TOOL Melissa Clark DESIGN Rachel Wolff-Lander Kate Wollensak Freeborn The authors wish to thank the six state Natural Heritage programs for sharing their data and for their support. ©2021 Published June 2021 © Peter James CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1 PART ONE: CONSERVING PLANT DIVERSITY 1-1 Background 1-2 • Plant Diversity and Resilience 1-2 • Global Strategy for Plant Conservation and Global Deal for Nature 1-7 • Secured Lands and GAP Status 1-9 • New England Flora and Rare Taxa 1-11 • Threats to Plant Diversity in New England 1-14 • Conservation Actions to Counter Threats to Plant Diversity 1-17 Conservation of Habitats and Important Plant Areas 1-21 Introduction 1-21 • Terminology 1-21 • Overview and Methods 1-22 Conservation of Habitats: Progress Toward Global and Regional Goals 1-26 • Matrix Forests 1-26 • Wetlands 1-30 • Patch-forming Habitats 1-33 • Risk of Conversion 1-36 Conservation of Important Plant Areas (IPAs) 1-37 • Definition and Location of IPAs 1-37 • Conservation Status and Progress Toward Goals 1-40 • Representation of Habitats in the IPAs 1-42 Conservation of Threatened Species 1-48 • Threatened Plants Conserved in situ 1-48 • Threatened Plants Conserved in ex situ Collections 1-49 Results and Recommendations 1-58 i CONTENTS continued PART TWO: STATUS REPORT AND MAPS 2-1 Overview 2-4 New England’s Terrestrial Habitats 2-7 Map Page Layout 2-13 Upland Habitats: Matrix Forest 2-16 Upland Habitats: Patch-forming Habitats 2-53 Wetland Habitats 2-80 PART THREE: SUPPORTING MATERIAL 3-1 Bibliography 3-2 Appendices 3-11 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Bryce
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 ON THE COVER Matted prickly-phlox (Leptodactylon caespitosum), Bryce Canyon National Park, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Sarah Topp Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 January 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Carex of New England
    Field Guide to Carex of New England Lisa A. Standley A Special Publication of the New England Botanical Club About the Author: Lisa A. Standley is an environmental consultant. She obtained a B.S, and M.S. from Cornell University and Ph.D. from the University of Washington. She has published several articles on the systematics of Carex, particularly Section Phacocystis, and was the author of several section treatments in the Flora of North America. Cover Illustrations: Pictured are Carex pensylvanica and Carex intumescens. Field Guide to Carex of New England Lisa A. Standley Special Publication of the New England Botanical Club Copyright © 2011 Lisa A. Standley Acknowledgements This book is dedicated to Robert Reed, who first urged me to write a user-friendly guide to Carex; to the memory of Melinda F. Denton, my mentor and inspiration; and to Tony Reznicek, for always sharing his expertise. I would like to thank all of the people who helped with this book in so many ways, particularly Karen Searcy and Robert Bertin for their careful editing; Paul Somers, Bruce Sorrie, Alice Schori, Pam Weatherbee, and others who helped search for sedges; Arthur Gilman, Melissa Dow Cullina, and Patricia Swain, who carefully read early drafts of the book; and to Emily Wood, Karen Searcy, and Ray Angelo, who provided access to the herbaria at Harvard University, the University of Massachusetts, and the New England Botanical Club. CONTENTS Introduction .......................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • VH Flora Complete Rev 18-19
    Flora of Vinalhaven Island, Maine Macrolichens, Liverworts, Mosses and Vascular Plants Javier Peñalosa Version 1.4 Spring 2019 1. General introduction ------------------------------------------------------------------------1.1 2. The Setting: Landscape, Geology, Soils and Climate ----------------------------------2.1 3. Vegetation of Vinalhaven Vegetation: classification or description? --------------------------------------------------3.1 The trees and shrubs --------------------------------------------------------------------------3.1 The Forest --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3.3 Upland spruce-fir forest -----------------------------------------------------------------3.3 Deciduous woodlands -------------------------------------------------------------------3.6 Pitch pine woodland ---------------------------------------------------------------------3.6 The shore ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3.7 Rocky headlands and beaches ----------------------------------------------------------3.7 Salt marshes -------------------------------------------------------------------------------3.8 Shrub-dominated shoreline communities --------------------------------------------3.10 Freshwater wetlands -------------------------------------------------------------------------3.11 Streams -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------3.11 Ponds -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3.11
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Flora: Fabaceae (Leguminosae)
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 38 Number 3 Article 1 9-30-1978 Utah flora: Fabaceae (Leguminosae) Stanley L. Welsh Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Welsh, Stanley L. (1978) "Utah flora: Fabaceae (Leguminosae)," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 38 : No. 3 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol38/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Great Basin Naturalist Published at Provo, Utah, by Brigham Young University ISSN 0017-3614 Volume 38 September 30, 1978 No. 3 UTAH FLORA: FABACEAE (LEGUMINOSAE) Stanley L. Welsh' Abstract.— A revision of the legume family, Fabaceae (Leguminosae), is presented for the state of Utah. In- cluded are 244 species and 60 varieties of indigenous and introduced plants. A key to genera and species is pro- vided, along with detailed descriptions, distributional data, and pertinent comments. Proposed new taxa are As- tragalus lentiginosus Dougl. ex Hook, var. wahweapensis Welsh; Astragalus subcinereus A. Gray var. basalticus Welsh; Hedysarum occidentale Greene var. canone Welsh; Oxytropis oreophila A. Gray var. juniperina Welsh; and Trifolium andersonii A. Gray var. friscanum Welsh. New combinations include Astragalus bisulcatus (Hook.) A. Gray var. major (M. E. Jones) Welsh; Astragalus consobrinus (Bameby) Welsh; Astragalus pubentissimus Torr & Gray var. peabodianus (M. E. Jones) Welsh; Lathyrus brachycalyx Rydb. var.
    [Show full text]