SENIOR WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS 2017-
WOMEN’S WRESTLING
8/23- SCORING ANALYSIS 24/2017 REPORT
Breakdown of all wrestlers’ scoring Top 10 Teams performance Winners performance Senior World Championships 2017- Women’s Wrestling Senior World Championships 2017- Women’s Wrestling SCORING ANALYSIS REPORT
AIM To breakdown the scoring made by Women’s Wrestling participants during Senior World Championships 2017, held on Paris, France, from August 23th & 24th 2017. The present report, made by UWW’s Analytics Manager David López, follows key features from reporting style and wrestlers’ performance descriptors established by Dr. Harold Tünnemann (GER, Wrestling Hall of Fame member) along the last 2 decades. Some new indicators were added to expand the scope of data. METHODS Were analyzed all the 227 bouts held by the 191 competitors representing 44 national teams who took part of the tournament. Tools used for analyzing and describing scoring events were the official videos of the championships and Dartfish Team Pro 9 Video Analysis Software. Were classified all 1066 scoring events awarded with technical points during the tournament, notating the following features:
Type of Scoring Minute when the Scoring value Technical Group Strategic Role Event event was done Technical moves: Ranging from 1st 1 point Standing moves: All technical Standing moves to 6th minute 2 points Leg attacks moves: Par-terre moves 4 points Takedowns Attack 5 points Throws & Shifts Penalizations: Counterattack Step outs Passivities Blockages Cautions Lost Challenges Par-terre moves: Turn-overs Spins Lifts Reversals Blockages
Additionally, total time on mat by wrestler and team were recorded as decimal minutes (example: 20 min 30 sec. equals 20.5 minutes) to normalize wrestlers’ activity by dividing scored and lost points by time spent on mat. 24 charts were created using Office Excel to break down overall scoring average values of all competitors as well as of Top 10 Teams ranked and by every one of the Champions of the 8 weight classes convened.
Page 1 Senior World Championships 2017- Women’s Wrestling PARTICIPANTS BY TEAM AND WEIGHT CATEGORY Teams 48 kg 53 kg 55 kg 58 kg 69 kg 60 kg 63 kg 75 kg TOTAL 1 AUS 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 2 AUT 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 AZE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 7 4 BLR 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 7 5 BRA 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 4 6 BUL 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 6 7 CAN 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 8 CHN 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 7 9 COL 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 4 10 CZE 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 11 DOM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 12 EGY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 13 ESP 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 EST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 15 FRA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 16 GER 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 6 17 HUN 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 18 IND 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 19 ISR 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 20 ITA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 21 JPN 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 6 22 KAZ 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 6 23 KGZ 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 3 24 KOR 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 25 LAT 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 26 LTU 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 27 MDA 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 28 MGL 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 7 29 NED 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 30 NGR 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 4 31 NOR 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 32 NZL 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 33 PER 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 4 34 POL 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 6 35 PRK 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 36 PUR 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 37 ROU 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 38 RUS 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 7 39 SWE 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 4 40 TUN 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 41 TUR 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 6 42 UKR 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 7 43 USA 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 7 44 VIE 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 5 TOTAL 27 25 24 27 19 23 23 23 191
Page 2 Senior World Championships 2017- Women’s Wrestling SENIORS WOMEN'S WRESTLING TEAMS RANKING (Classification Points earned by Weight Class) Rank Team 48 kg 53 kg 55 kg 58 kg 69 kg 60 kg 63 kg 75 kg TOTAL 1 JAPAN 10 9 10 10 10 3 8 60 2 BELARUS 6 10 8 3 2 9 38 2 UNITED STATES 6 3 8 10 2 9 38 4 MONGOLIA 3 4 6 10 2 25 5 TURKEY 8 6 10 24 6 CANADA 4 8 4 8 24 7 CHINA 6 8 6 20 8 ROMANIA 9 6 3 18 9 SWEDEN 6 8 4 18 10 NIGERIA 9 2 6 17 11 RUSSIA 4 4 1 8 17 12 FRANCE 2 6 8 16 13 GERMANY 9 6 15 14 UKRAINE 2 3 9 14 15 DPR KOREA 8 6 14 16 COLOMBIA 8 4 12 17 POLAND 3 8 11 18 TUNISIA 9 9 19 KYRGYZSTAN 8 1 9 20 LATVIA 8 8 21 BULGARIA 6 2 8 22 KAZAKHSTAN 1 6 7 23 INDIA 1 1 2 3 7 24 AUSTRIA 6 6 24 ESTONIA 6 6 26 DOMINICA 4 4 27 BRAZIL 1 1
27 LITHUANIA 1 1 27 VIETNAM 1 1 30 AUSTRALIA 0 30 AZERBAIJAN 0 30 CZECHIA 0 30 EGYPT 0 30 SPAIN 0 30 HUNGARY 0 30 ISRAEL 0 30 ITALY 0 30 KOREA 0 30 MOLDOVA 0 30 NETHERLANDS 0 30 NORWAY 0
30 NEW ZEALAND 0 30 PERU 0 30 PUERTO RICO 0
Page 3 Senior World Championships 2017- Women’s Wrestling 1. SCORING BREAKDOWN, ALL WRESTLERS
1.1 Quality of Wrestling
Figure 1 - Quality of Wrestling (attacking points/min) All Women Average - Per value and total
Total pts/min 1.92
5 0.00
4 0.29
2 1.42
1 0.22
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00
1.2 Quality of Wrestling by Weight Category
Figure 2 - Quality of Wrestling (points scored/min) by weight category All Women 3.00 2.46 1.73 1.74 2.25 1.94 2.15 1.65 1.41 2.50 0.29 0.28 2.00 0.47 0.35 0.23 0.20 1.50 0.34 1.78 0.15 1.86 1.30 1.33 1.34 1.48 1.13 1.00 1.04 0.50 0.31 0.00 0.19 0.21 0.19 0.25 0.20 0.19 0.22 48 53 55 58 60 63 69 75 Total Pts/min 2.46 1.73 1.74 2.25 1.94 2.15 1.65 1.41 5 pts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 pts 0.29 0.23 0.20 0.28 0.35 0.47 0.34 0.15 2 pts 1.86 1.30 1.33 1.78 1.34 1.48 1.13 1.04 1 pt 0.31 0.19 0.21 0.19 0.25 0.20 0.19 0.22
Highlights
Quality of Wrestling value reached by all Women (1.92 pts/m) was slightly lower than Men’s Freestyle (1.99 pts/m). Quality per scoring value in Women’s Wrestling shows a similar trend than Men’s Freestyle, but the first ones showed a higher scoring with 4 points actions (Women= 0.29 pts/m, Men= 0.16). By weight class, 48kg, 58kg and 63kg overpassed 2.0 pts/m. The higher performance scoring with 4 points actions was shown by weight classes 60kg, 63kg and 69kg, ranging from 0.34 to 0.47 pts/m.
Page 4 Senior World Championships 2017- Women’s Wrestling
1.3 Points scored per value – Total and Percentage
Figure 3 - Pts Scored Per Value - All Women Highlights
5 pts, 2049 tech. pts. were 0, 0% scored by all Women, 4 pts, 304, 15% 1 pt, 235, 11% being almost 75% scored with 2 pts actions. 4 pts. actions reached 15% of the total scoring, almost the 2 pts, 1510, 74% double of the scored by men (8.1%). Nevertheless, not a single 5 pts action were registered.
1.4 Scoring pace - Points scored minute by minute.
Highlights Figure 4 - Scoring Pace (points scored by every minute of match) - All Women Women’s Wrestling values showed similar trend than 450 25.0% Men’s Freestyle: 400 350 20.0% Minute by minute 300 activity was constant, 15.0% ranging from almost 250 200 14% to a bit over 20%. 10.0% 150 Second minute of match 100 registered the highest 5.0% 50 scoring percentage of, 0 0.0% which could be 1st min 2nd min 3rd min 4th min 5th min 6th min explained by the Percentage 13.9% 20.7% 18.2% 15.9% 15.4% 15.8% Pts scored by activity encouraging 282 419 369 322 311 320 every minute of bout rules.
Page 5 Senior World Championships 2017- Women’s Wrestling 1.5 Methods to score, all wrestlers.
Figure 5 - Methods to score Highlights (pts/m, percentage, all Women) Lost Standing moves were the most used Passivity, Challenges, method to score (71%). Altogether 0.08, 4% 0.02, 1% Cautions, with Par-Terre moves (22%), technical 0.04, 2% actions were the way to score more Par-Terre than 90% of the total points moves, 0.42, awarded. 22% Low contribution of penalizations to Standing the total scoring shows that the current moves, 1.36, rules allows wrestlers to decide bouts 71% by themselves, consolidating the changes made 4 years ago.
1.6 Breakdown of Scoring by Technical Groups Highlights Figure 6 - Standing Points by Technical Groups - All Women Leg attacks (1.41pts/m) and 1.41 Par-terre Spins (gut wrenches, ankles laces among other moves, 0.29pts/m) 0.56 were the most
0.25 recurrent technical 0.05 0.02 group in Women’s Leg attacks Takedowns Shifts & Throws Step outs Blocks Wrestling. Pts/m 1.41 0.56 0.25 0.05 0.02 Step-outs low contribution suggests Figure 7 - Par Terre Points by Technical that the current rule to assess these Groups - All Women moves are good to motivate wrestlers to 0.29 score more through real techniques. Par terre arsenal keep a decreasing 0.08 trend along the last 0.02 0.02 years, as Turnovers, 0.00 Turn overs Spins Reversals Lifts Blocks Reversals and Pts/m 0.08 0.29 0.02 0.00 0.02 Counter-offensive blocks show.
Page 6 Senior World Championships 2017- Women’s Wrestling 1.7 Points scored by Technical Moves minute by minute
Figure 8 - Points scored by Technical Moves minute by minute All Women 0.14
0.12
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00 Shift & Counteroffe ParT Leg attack Takedown Step out Turn-over Spin Reversal Throws nsive Block Blockage 1st min 0.09 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 2nd min 0.12 0.07 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.07 0.01 0.01 3rd min 0.11 0.05 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.08 0.00 0.00 4th min 0.11 0.07 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.01 5th min 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 6th min 0.08 0.09 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.00
Highlights
Overall, the technical activity of Women’s Wrestlers showed a constant usage as scoring resource:
Almost all technical groups were registered at least one single in every one of the 6 min. Usually, a technical group frequency decreases along second period as high-level wrestlers win by technical superiority. This is the case of Leg Attacks and Spins. In the other hand, Takedowns frequency significantly increased as the match approached the final minute). Likely these were counterattacks against leg attacks. Shift & Throws and Turn overs were consistently executed along the 6 minutes of bout.
Page 7 Senior World Championships 2017- Women’s Wrestling 1.8 Points scored by Strategy (attack and counterattack moves)
Figure 9 - Points scored by strategy, all Women - Standing 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Throws & Standing Total points Leg attacks Takedowns Step outs Shifts Blocks by strategy Counterattack 25 218 94 7 26 370 Attack 610 196 189 50 0 1045
Figure 10 - Points scored by strategy, all Women - Par terre 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% TOTAL POINTS Turn-over Spins Reversals Blocks BY STRATEGY Counterattack 28 28 18 24 98 Attack 60 286 0 0 346
Highlights
For both Standing and Par-terre, Attack strategies represented more than 70% of the total scoring. On standing, leg attacks, shifts & throws and step-outs were used more as attacking resource, while over than 50% of the takedowns were made as counter-offensive moves. While more than 60% of the turn-overs were made as counter-offensive moves by Men’s Freestyle wrestlers in this tournament, Women showed the opposite trend. Due to their technical nature, Standing and Par-terre blocks (to hold defensive position against an attacking opponent to retain her/him on danger position) as well as reversals are 100% counter- offensive technical groups. Given its low frequency, these did not change the predominant offensive behavior of women wrestlers.
Page 8 Senior World Championships 2017- Women’s Wrestling 2. PERFORMANCE OF TOP 10 TEAMS
2.1 Wrestling Efficacy (Wrestling Quality, Defense Stability, Efficacy Index)
Figure 11 - Wrestling Efficacy, Women's Wrestling Top 10 teams 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 -0.20 -0.40 JPN BLR USA MGL TUR CAN CHN ROU SWE NGR WQ 1.43 1.18 1.32 1.05 0.81 1.28 1.25 1.16 0.66 1.28 Neg. WQ 0.38 0.76 0.81 0.85 1.06 1.04 0.82 0.76 0.78 0.95 Index 1.05 0.42 0.50 0.20 -0.25 0.24 0.43 0.40 -0.13 0.33
Highlights
The difference between points scored per minute on mat (Wrestling Quality or WQ) and Points lost per minute on mat (Defense Stability or neg. WQ) results Efficacy Index. The higher the gap between WQ and neg. WQ, the higher and better efficacy index (Tünnemann, 2016). As reported by Tünnemann (2016), Champion team JPN had a slightly lower Efficacy index in Championships (1.05pts/m) than 2015 World Championships (1.14pts/m), but their defensive skills were higher this 2017 edition (2017=0.38 neg pts/m, 2015=0.49). Even so, Japan had the best defensive efficacy on both 2015 and 2017 World Championships. Japan, USA, Canada, China and Nigeria showed higher Wrestling Quality values (over 1.2pts/m). Efficacy Index values of Canada and Nigeria was affected by their Defensive performance (1.04 and 0.95 neg. pts/m). It is worthy to highlight Belarus, USA, Romania and Nigeria performances, making the Top 10 teams ranking. Turkey and Sweden teams had negative Efficacy Index values due to offensive performance lower than 0.85 pts/m, which were below their own defensive skills values. Kazakhstan and Armenia teams scored almost as much as points as they lost during the tournament.
Page 9 Senior World Championships 2017- Women’s Wrestling 2.2 Distribution of Points scored by value.
Figure 12 - Points scored per Value, Women's Wrestling Top 10 teams (pts/m) 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 JPN BLR USA MGL TUR CAN CHN ROU SWE NGR 1 pt scored 0.12 0.15 0.10 0.17 0.13 0.09 0.09 0.19 0.01 0.16 2 pts scored 1.11 0.90 1.03 0.78 0.64 1.14 0.95 0.69 0.53 0.96 4 pts scored 0.19 0.13 0.19 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.20 0.28 0.11 0.16 5 pts scored 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 pt lost 0.06 0.11 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.10 0.11 0.04 2 pts lost 0.24 0.48 0.67 0.62 0.75 0.79 0.61 0.66 0.67 0.76 4 pts lost 0.08 0.17 0.04 0.10 0.18 0.12 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.16 5 pts lost 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Highlights
Japan, USA and Canada were the top teams in terms of 2 points scoring value, above 1pt/m. The higher scoring by 4 points moves were made by Romania, followed by China, both on 0.20 pts/m or above. Canada, Nigeria and Turkey gave more points due to 2 points actions than the other teams, over 0.70 neg. pts/m. Turkey, Belarus and Nigeria lost over 0.15pts/m due to 4pts actions.
2.3 Scoring Pace of Top 10 teams
Figure 13 - Scoring Pace of Women's Wrestling Top 10 teams Highlights 35.0% As Team, USA 30.0% wrestlers showed 25.0% 20.0% the best 15.0% performance on 10.0% first periods, 5.0% 0.0% highlighting their JPN BLR USA MGL TUR CAN CHN ROU SWE NGR very first minute. 1st min 14.1% 13.4% 26.2% 10.1% 13.5% 1.6% 8.1% 20.9% 8.5% 14.3% Canada, China and 2nd min 20.9% 23.2% 17.7% 12.4% 20.3% 23.6% 19.5% 16.4% 21.3% 29.6% Sweden were the 3rd min 18.0% 20.4% 26.2% 19.4% 10.8% 24.4% 29.3% 7.5% 19.1% 18.4% teams who scored 4th min 23.3% 10.6% 12.1% 13.2% 13.5% 20.3% 11.4% 25.4% 21.3% 11.2% less during Minute 5th min 13.6% 12.0% 10.6% 25.6% 23.0% 20.3% 12.2% 14.9% 17.0% 12.2% 5th min 10.2% 20.4% 7.1% 19.4% 18.9% 9.8% 19.5% 14.9% 12.8% 14.3% 1.
Page 10 Senior World Championships 2017- Women’s Wrestling 2.4 Methods to score, Top 10 teams
Figure 14 - Methods to score, Women's Wrestling, Top 10 teams
Lost Challenges
Passivity
Cautions Highlights
The highest value of points scored by technical moves on standing corresponds to teams Japan, Par-Terre moves Romania and Nigeria, all of them over 0.90 pts/m. Sweden and Turkey had the lowest values of this variable. Canada, China and USA scored more Standing moves points on par-terre, over 0.40pts/m each. Mongolia, Romania and Sweden 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 Teams scored 0.12pts/m or less in Standing Par-Terre Lost par-terre. Cautions Passivity moves moves Challenges Similarly than Men’s Freestyle, points JPN 0.99 0.33 0.01 0.07 0.02 earned by Cautions, Passivity and BLR 0.86 0.21 0.05 0.02 0.03 Lost Challenges contributed as a low USA 0.83 0.41 0.02 0.05 0.01 percentage to total scoring. MGL 0.79 0.19 0.02 0.05 0.01 TUR 0.65 0.12 0.00 0.02 0.02 CAN 0.73 0.50 0.00 0.05 0.00 CHN 0.77 0.43 0.00 0.05 0.00 ROU 0.93 0.10 0.03 0.07 0.02 SWE 0.48 0.11 0.06 0.00 0.01 NGR 0.91 0.29 0.03 0.03 0.03
Page 11 Senior World Championships 2017- Women’s Wrestling 2.5 Methods which Top 10 teams lost points
Figure 15 - Methods which Women's Wrestling, Top 10 teams lost points
Lost Challenges
Passivity
Cautions
Highlights
Japan, Champion Team, had the best Par-Terre moves values of less points given by Standing and Par-terre moves. After Japan, Romania, China and Sweden lost less points in standing (less than 0.50 neg.pts/m), but these Standing moves last three Teams were also among the 4 teams who lost more points on par-terre, overpassing 0.20pts/m. 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 Regarding par-terre defense, al Standing Par-Terre Lost Cautions Passivity almost linear, increasing trend can be moves moves Challenges seen from 1st to 6th team ranked. JPN 0.33 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.00 First 4 teams ranked lost less than BLR 0.61 0.09 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 pts/m due to passivity, while USA 0.63 0.15 0.00 0.04 0.00 Turkey, Canada, China and Sweden MGL 0.60 0.20 0.03 0.02 0.00 TUR 0.77 0.18 0.02 0.08 0.02 lost between 0.07 and 0.08 pts/m. CAN 0.72 0.19 0.04 0.07 0.02 This suggests that Active Wrestling CHN 0.45 0.24 0.04 0.08 0.01 represents a clear trend related with ROU 0.38 0.29 0.03 0.00 0.05 the Team Ranking. SWE 0.46 0.22 0.03 0.07 0.00 Points given by Cautions and Lost NGR 0.69 0.23 0.00 0.03 0.00 challenge did not critically contribute to negative scoring.
Page 12 Senior World Championships 2017- Women’s Wrestling 2.6 Points scored by strategy and move, Top 10 teams
Figure 16 - Scoring Strategies, Standing Moves by Attack & Counterattack Women's Wrestling, Top 10 Teams 1.0 100.0% 0.8 80.0% 0.6 60.0% Pts/m 0.4 40.0% 0.2 20.0% 0.0 0.0% JPN BLR USA MGL TUR CAN CHN ROU SWE NGR TOTAL pts/m by STANDING ATTACKS 84.6% 57.7% 66.3% 63.9% 54.2% 73.5% 50.0% 83.3% 82.4% 80.0% Position per Percentage TOTAL pts/m by STANDING COUNTERATTACKS 15.4% 42.3% 33.7% 36.1% 45.8% 26.5% 50.0% 16.7% 17.6% 20.0% Standing Blocks, Counterattack 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 Step outs, Counterattack 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 Step outs, Attack 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.03 Throws & Shifts, Counterattack 0.00 0.08 0.06 0.07 0.12 0.06 0.14 0.10 0.03 0.05 Throws & Shifts, Attack 0.01 0.06 0.19 0.10 0.02 0.06 0.02 0.41 0.00 0.05 Takedowns, counterattacks 0.10 0.20 0.21 0.19 0.11 0.12 0.20 0.03 0.06 0.10 Takedowns, attack 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.04 0.21 0.06 0.16 Leg attacks, counterattacks 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 Leg attacks, attack 0.72 0.28 0.26 0.27 0.20 0.35 0.30 0.09 0.34 0.49
Figure 17 - Scoring Strategies, Par-terre Moves by Attack & Counterattack Women's Wrestling, Top 10 Teams
1.0 120.0%
0.8 100.0% 80.0% 0.6 60.0% Pts/m 0.4 40.0% 0.2 20.0%
0.0 0.0% Position per Percentage JPN BLR USA MGL TUR CAN CHN ROU SWE NGR TOTAL pts/m by PAR-TERRE ATTACKS 79.2% 80.0% 95.5% 78.3% 36.4% 95.8% 88.4% 100.0% 75.0% 80.0% TOTAL pts/m by PAR-TERRE COUNTER-ATTACKS 20.8% 20.0% 4.5% 21.7% 63.6% 4.2% 11.6% 0.0% 25.0% 20.0% Blocks 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 Reversals & Blocks 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 Spins, Counterattacks 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.03 Spins, attacks 0.25 0.13 0.36 0.13 0.04 0.29 0.37 0.10 0.06 0.18 Turn-over, counterattacks 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.03 0.00 Turn-over, attacks 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.19 0.02 0.00 0.03 0.03
Highlights Japan scored more points by offensive leg attacks (0.72pts/m), followed by Nigeria (0.49pts/m) and Canada (0.35pts/m). Romania showed outstanding performance by using offensive Takedowns (0.21pts/m) while USA and Belarus reached similar values with counteroffensive Takedowns. With 0.41pts/m, Romania scored more points by offensive Shifts and Throws than the rest of teams. On par-terre, basically all teams scored the most of their points by spins
Page 13 Senior World Championships 2017- Women’s Wrestling 3. ANALYSIS OF WINNERS SCORING
3.1 Wrestling Efficacy (Wrestling Quality, Defense Stability, Efficacy Index)
Figure 18 - Wrestling Efficacy, Women's Wrestling Champions (Wrestling Quality, Defense Stability, Efficacy Index) 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 53kg (BLR) 55kg (JPN) 58kg (USA) 63kg (MGL) 48kg (JPN) Yui Vanesa 60kg (JPN) 69kg (JPN) 75kg (TUR) Haruna Helen Louise Orkhon SUSAKI KALADZINSKA Risako KAWAI Sara DOSHO Yasemin ADAR OKUNO MAROULIS PUREVDORJ YA WQ 3.01 1.49 1.45 3.96 1.70 1.89 0.88 1.06 neg.WQ 0.45 0.56 0.18 0.00 0.18 0.29 0.13 0.51 Index 2.56 0.93 1.27 3.96 1.52 1.59 0.75 0.56
Highlights Susaki (JPN, 48kg) and Maroulis (USA, 58kg) scored more than 3 pts/m. Due to a perfect defense, the last one almost reached an Efficacy Index of 4pts/m. Champions from Belarus and Mongolia, as well as Japanese champions of 55kg and 60kg, had efficacy indexes around 1pts/m. 69kg and 75kg Champions had the lowest Efficacy Index among this group, with opposite strategies between them: Dosho (JPN) scored less than Adar (TUR) but the defense of the first one was quite good (0.13 neg.pts/m, the second better after Maroulis).
3.2 Distribution of points scored and lost by value, Women’s Wrestling Champions.
Figure 19 - Distribution of points scored by value Highlights Women's Wrestling Champions Maroulis and Susaki 4.00 had outstanding
3.00 performances scoring with 2points actions. 2.00 6 of 8 champions 1.00 scored at least one 4 point move. 0.00 48kg 53kg 55kg 58kg 60kg 63kg 69kg 75kg (JPN) (BLR) (JPN) (USA) (JPN) (MGL) (JPN) (TUR) 1 pt 0.28 0.28 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.04 0.05 2 pts 2.73 0.84 0.90 3.51 1.20 1.43 0.67 1.01 4 pts 0.00 0.37 0.36 0.30 0.37 0.34 0.17 0.00 5 pts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Page 14 Senior World Championships 2017- Women’s Wrestling
Figure 20 - Distribution of points lost by value Highlights Women's Wrestling Champions Almost all champions kept 1.00 lost points below 0.30pts/m, 0.80 excepting Kaladzinskaya 0.60 (Belarus, 53kg), but this last was the only one not giving a 0.40 single point with other values 0.20 actions. 0.00 48kg 53kg 55kg 58kg 60kg 63kg 69kg 75kg (JPN) (BLR) (JPN) (USA) (JPN) (MGL) (JPN) (TUR) 1 pt 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.09 0.13 0.04 0.20 2 pts 0.23 0.56 0.09 0.00 0.09 0.17 0.08 0.30 4 pts 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 pts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.3 Scoring pace of Women’s Wrestling Champions. Figure 21 - Scoring PaceWomen's Wrestling Champions 45.0% 40.0% 35.0% 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 48kg (JPN) 53kg (BLR) 55kg (JPN) 58kg (USA) 60kg (JPN) 63kg (MGL) 69kg (JPN) 75kg (TUR) 1st min 24.5% 6.3% 6.3% 34.6% 10.8% 13.3% 9.5% 19.0% 2nd min 17.0% 21.9% 15.6% 15.4% 18.9% 8.9% 14.3% 38.1% 3rd min 22.6% 28.1% 34.4% 42.3% 5.4% 31.1% 19.0% 0.0% 4th min 30.2% 3.1% 15.6% 7.7% 27.0% 13.3% 19.0% 9.5% 5th min 3.8% 15.6% 18.8% 0.0% 16.2% 24.4% 28.6% 0.0% 6th min 1.9% 25.0% 9.4% 0.0% 21.6% 8.9% 9.5% 33.3%
Highlights
Champions of 48kg, 58kg and 75kg scored many points during Period 1. The Turkish did not score at all during minutes 3rd and 5th, but had a strong 6th min scoring 33% of her total earned points. Despite different scoring pace patterns, Champions from 48kg to 69kg showed consistent rhythm to score, and all 8 Champions scored at least 6.3% of their technical points on a 1st minute, which suggests an active wrestling behavior characterizes all of them.
Page 15 Senior World Championships 2017- Women’s Wrestling 3.4 Methods to score, Women’s Wrestling champions
Highlights Figure 22 - Methods to score, Women's Wrestling - Champions No clear pattern was seen across weight classes 3.00
regarding standing moves, 2.50 except the highest weight classes, which scored less 2.00 on standing than the 1.50 others. 1.00 The Top scorers, 48kg and 58kg champions were also 0.50
the top scores in both 0.00 Standing moves Par-Terre moves Cautions Passivity Lost Challenges standing and par terre. 48kg (JPN) 1.59 1.25 0.11 0.00 0.06 As mentioned before, 53kg (BLR) 1.25 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.05 contribution of 55kg (JPN) 1.27 0.09 0.05 0.00 0.05 penalizations were so low 58kg (USA) 2.44 1.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 60kg (JPN) 1.47 0.09 0.14 0.00 0.00 than suggests the 63kg (MGL) 1.59 0.17 0.04 0.00 0.00 champions shine due to 69kg (JPN) 0.83 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 their active wrestling. 75kg (TUR) 0.91 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.05
3.5 Points scored by strategy and move, Women’s Wrestling Champions
Figure 23 - Scoring Strategies, Standing Moves by Attack & Highlights Counterattack, Women's Wrestling Champions Maroulis exposed 100% 1.80 her great technical 90% 1.60 capabilities on both 80% 1.40 70% 1.20 offense and counter- 60% 1.00 offense moves in 50%
0.80 Pts/m standing position. 40% scored scored on standing 30% 0.60 The other champions Percentage Percentage of points total 20% 0.40 were outstanding 10% 0.20 one or another 0% 0.00 63kg 48kg 53kg 55kg 58kg 60kg 69kg 75kg strategy: 48kg, (MGL (JPN) (BLR) (JPN) (USA) (JPN) (JPN) (TUR) ) 55kg, 60kg, 69kg TOTAL STANDING ATTACKS 1.53 0.42 1.09 1.37 1.29 0.71 0.58 0.61 and 75kg champions TOTAL STANDING 0.06 0.65 0.18 1.07 0.18 0.88 0.25 0.30 were much more COUNTERATTACKS active as attacking Standing Blocks, Counterattack 08000200 Step outs, Counterattack 00000100 wrestlers, while Step outs, Attack 03100100 53kg and 63 kg. Throws & Shifts, Counterattack 06000602 showed higher Throws & Shifts, Attack 20040402 scoring based on Takedowns, counterattacks 1 0 0 12 4 12 4 4 standing counter- Takedowns, attack 42066400 offensive moves. Leg attacks, counterattacks 00420020 Leg attacks, attack 21 4 23 8 22 8 14 10
Page 16 Senior World Championships 2017- Women’s Wrestling
Highlights Figure 24 - Scoring Strategies, Par-terre Moves by Attack & Counterattack, Women's Wrestling Champions On par-terre, champions showed a 100% 1.80 90% 1.60 specialization on 80% 1.40 spins. The only 70% 1.20 60% significant difference 1.00 50% among them was the 0.80 40% Pts/m impressive offensive 30% 0.60 skills of Susaki and 20% 0.40 scored standing on scored Maroulis (over than 10% 0.20 Percentage of total points points total of Percentage 0% 0.00 58kg 63kg 1pts/m) as the rest 48kg 53kg 55kg 60kg 69kg 75kg (USA (MGL (JPN) (BLR) (JPN) (JPN) (JPN) (TUR) of champions kept ) ) values below TOTAL PAR-TERRE ATTACKS 1.14 0.09 0.09 1.52 0.09 0.17 0.00 0.10 TOTAL PAR-TERRE 0.10pts/m. 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 COUNTERATTACKS Reversals & Blocks 20000000 Spins, Counterattacks 00000000 Spins, attacks 20 2 2 20 2 4 0 2 Turn-over, counterattacks 00000000 Turn-over, attacks 00000000
SUMMARY Technically speaking there are similar trends between Men’s Freestyle and Women’s Wrestling, such as active wrestling minute by minute, technical preferred moves (Leg attacks and Spins), low contribution of Passivities and Cautions to the total scoring, and a constant scoring pace characterizing Gold Medalists. As past years, Women’s Wrestlers score more points due to 4 points moves than Men’s Freestylers. Counteroffensive takedowns were seen more during Women’s Wrestling Tournament than Men’s Freestyle. Women showed less technical diversity in par-terre than Men’s freestyle in this Championships. Unlike Men’s Freestyle champions, Women’s Wrestling gold medalists scored much more points since the very 1st minute of matches.
Page 17