Richard Chinn Environmental Training, Inc. [email protected] 1.800.427.0307
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. -
"National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment. -
Towards Resolving Lamiales Relationships
Schäferhoff et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010, 10:352 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/352 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Towards resolving Lamiales relationships: insights from rapidly evolving chloroplast sequences Bastian Schäferhoff1*, Andreas Fleischmann2, Eberhard Fischer3, Dirk C Albach4, Thomas Borsch5, Günther Heubl2, Kai F Müller1 Abstract Background: In the large angiosperm order Lamiales, a diverse array of highly specialized life strategies such as carnivory, parasitism, epiphytism, and desiccation tolerance occur, and some lineages possess drastically accelerated DNA substitutional rates or miniaturized genomes. However, understanding the evolution of these phenomena in the order, and clarifying borders of and relationships among lamialean families, has been hindered by largely unresolved trees in the past. Results: Our analysis of the rapidly evolving trnK/matK, trnL-F and rps16 chloroplast regions enabled us to infer more precise phylogenetic hypotheses for the Lamiales. Relationships among the nine first-branching families in the Lamiales tree are now resolved with very strong support. Subsequent to Plocospermataceae, a clade consisting of Carlemanniaceae plus Oleaceae branches, followed by Tetrachondraceae and a newly inferred clade composed of Gesneriaceae plus Calceolariaceae, which is also supported by morphological characters. Plantaginaceae (incl. Gratioleae) and Scrophulariaceae are well separated in the backbone grade; Lamiaceae and Verbenaceae appear in distant clades, while the recently described Linderniaceae are confirmed to be monophyletic and in an isolated position. Conclusions: Confidence about deep nodes of the Lamiales tree is an important step towards understanding the evolutionary diversification of a major clade of flowering plants. The degree of resolution obtained here now provides a first opportunity to discuss the evolution of morphological and biochemical traits in Lamiales. -
The Natural Communities of South Carolina
THE NATURAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTH CAROLINA BY JOHN B. NELSON SOUTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE & MARINE RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FEBRUARY 1986 INTRODUCTION The maintenance of an accurate inventory of a region's natural resources must involve a system for classifying its natural communities. These communities themselves represent identifiable units which, like individual plant and animal species of concern, contribute to the overall natural diversity characterizing a given region. This classification has developed from a need to define more accurately the range of natural habitats within South Carolina. From the standpoint of the South Carolina Nongame and Heritage Trust Program, the conceptual range of natural diversity in the state does indeed depend on knowledge of individual community types. Additionally, it is recognized that the various plant and animal species of concern (which make up a significant remainder of our state's natural diversity) are often restricted to single natural communities or to a number of separate, related ones. In some cases, the occurrence of a given natural community allows us to predict, with some confidence, the presence of specialized or endemic resident species. It follows that a reasonable and convenient method of handling the diversity of species within South Carolina is through the concept of these species as residents of a range of natural communities. Ideally, a nationwide classification system could be developed and then used by all the states. Since adjacent states usually share a number of community types, and yet may each harbor some that are unique, any classification scheme on a national scale would be forced to recognize the variation in a given community from state to state (or region to region) and at the same time to maintain unique communities as distinctive. -
Diversification of Myco-Heterotrophic Angiosperms: Evidence From
BMC Evolutionary Biology BioMed Central Research article Open Access Diversification of myco-heterotrophic angiosperms: Evidence from Burmanniaceae Vincent Merckx*1, Lars W Chatrou2, Benny Lemaire1, Moses N Sainge3, Suzy Huysmans1 and Erik F Smets1,4 Address: 1Laboratory of Plant Systematics, K.U. Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 31, P.O. Box 2437, BE-3001 Leuven, Belgium, 2National Herbarium of the Netherlands, Wageningen University Branch, Generaal Foulkesweg 37, NL-6703 BL Wageningen, The Netherlands, 3Centre for Tropical Forest Sciences (CTFS), University of Buea, Department of Plant & Animal Sciences, P.O. Box 63, Buea, Cameroon and 4National Herbarium of the Netherlands, Leiden University Branch, P.O. Box 9514, NL-2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands Email: Vincent Merckx* - [email protected]; Lars W Chatrou - [email protected]; Benny Lemaire - [email protected]; Moses N Sainge - [email protected]; Suzy Huysmans - [email protected]; Erik F Smets - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 23 June 2008 Received: 25 February 2008 Accepted: 23 June 2008 BMC Evolutionary Biology 2008, 8:178 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-178 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/178 © 2008 Merckx et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: Myco-heterotrophy evolved independently several times during angiosperm evolution. Although many species of myco-heterotrophic plants are highly endemic and long- distance dispersal seems unlikely, some genera are widely dispersed and have pantropical distributions, often with large disjunctions. -
A Review on the Chemistry of Some Species of Genus Lippia (Verbenaceae Family)
Journal of Scientific and Innovative Research 2014; 3(4): 460-466 Available online at: www.jsirjournal.com Review Article A review on the chemistry of some species of genus ISSN 2320-4818 Lippia (Verbenaceae family) JSIR 2014; 3(4): 460-466 © 2014, All rights reserved Received: 26-06-2014 Japheth Omollo Ombito*, Elsie Nyangweso Salano, Philemon Kipkirui Yegon, Wesley Accepted: 24-08-2014 Kipkirui Ngetich, Elizabeth Muthoni Mwangi Abstract Japheth Omollo Ombito Department of Chemistry, Egerton Recently, focus on plant research has increased globally and a large amount of evidence has University, P.O. Box 536, Egerton- 20115, Kenya collected to show great potential of medicinal plants employed in diverse traditional systems. In the customary forms of medicine, plants provided a large number of remedies, which were often Elsie Nyangweso Salano useful. Lippia genus, which belongs to the family Verbenaceae yields appreciable quantities of Department of Biochemistry, Egerton University, P.O. Box 536, metabolites some of which have been shown to have valuable biological activities. Many Egerton-20115, Kenya phytochemical investigations done on this genus have shown the presence of various compounds like triterpenoids, phenols, flavonoids, phenylpropanoids and steroids. This review Philemon Kipkirui Yegon Department of Chemistry, Egerton focuses on ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry and pharmacology of Lippia genus to allow the University, P.O. Box 536, Egerton- evaluation of the potential for utilization of the largest biomass of Lippia genus available. 20115, Kenya Wesley Kipkirui Ngetich Keywords: Lippia, Triterpenoids, Phenols, Flavonoids, Phytochemistry, Department of Chemistry, Egerton Pharmacology. University, P.O. Box 536, Egerton- 20115, Kenya Elizabeth Muthoni Mwangi Introduction Department of Chemistry, Egerton University, P.O. -
ATLAS of FLORIDA PLANTS - 7/29/19 Lake County Native Species
ATLAS OF FLORIDA PLANTS - 7/29/19 Lake County Native Species Scientific_Name Common_Name Endemic State US 1 Abutilon hulseanum MAUVE N 2 Acalypha gracilens SLENDER THREESEED MERCURY N 3 Acalypha ostryifolia PINELAND THREESEED MERCURY N 4 Acer negundo BOXELDER N 5 Acer rubrum RED MAPLE N 6 Acrolejeunea heterophylla 7 Acrostichum danaeifolium GIANT LEATHER FERN N 8 Aeschynomene americana SHYLEAF N 9 Aeschynomene viscidula STICKY JOINTVETCH N 10 Aesculus pavia RED BUCKEYE N 11 Agalinis fasciculata BEACH FALSE FOXGLOVE N 12 Agalinis filifolia SEMINOLE FALSE FOXGLOVE N 13 Agalinis linifolia FLAXLEAF FALSE FOXGLOVE N 14 Agalinis plukenetii PLUKENET'S FALSE FOXGLOVE N 15 Agarista populifolia FLORIDA HOBBLEBUSH; PIPESTEM N 16 Ageratina jucunda HAMMOCK SNAKEROOT N 17 Aletris lutea YELLOW COLICROOT N 18 Allium canadense var. canadense MEADOW GARLIC N 19 Amaranthus australis SOUTHERN AMARANTH N 20 Amblystegium serpens 21 Ambrosia artemisiifolia COMMON RAGWEED N 22 Amorpha fruticosa BASTARD FALSE INDIGO N 23 Amorpha herbacea var. herbacea CLUSTERSPIKE FALSE INDIGO N 24 Amphicarpum muehlenbergianum BLUE MAIDENCANE N 25 Amsonia ciliata FRINGED BLUESTAR N 26 Andropogon brachystachyus SHORTSPIKE BLUESTEM N 27 Andropogon floridanus FLORIDA BLUESTEM N 28 Andropogon glomeratus var. glaucopsis PURPLE BLUESTEM N 29 Andropogon glomeratus var. hirsutior BUSHY BLUESTEM N 30 Andropogon glomeratus var. pumilus BUSHY BLUESTEM N 31 Andropogon gyrans ELLIOTT'S BLUESTEM N 32 Andropogon longiberbis HAIRY BLUESTEM N 33 Andropogon ternarius SPLITBEARD BLUESTEM N 34 Andropogon -
Mississippi Natural Heritage Program Special Plants - Tracking List -2018
MISSISSIPPI NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM SPECIAL PLANTS - TRACKING LIST -2018- Approximately 3300 species of vascular plants (fern, gymnosperms, and angiosperms), and numerous non-vascular plants may be found in Mississippi. Many of these are quite common. Some, however, are known or suspected to occur in low numbers; these are designated as species of special concern, and are listed below. There are 495 special concern plants, which include 4 non- vascular plants, 28 ferns and fern allies, 4 gymnosperms, and 459 angiosperms 244 dicots and 215 monocots. An additional 100 species are designated “watch” status (see “Special Plants - Watch List”) with the potential of becoming species of special concern and include 2 fern and fern allies, 54 dicots and 44 monocots. This list is designated for the primary purposes of : 1) in environmental assessments, “flagging” of sensitive species that may be negatively affected by proposed actions; 2) determination of protection priorities of natural areas that contain such species; and 3) determination of priorities of inventory and protection for these plants, including the proposed listing of species for federal protection. GLOBAL STATE FEDERAL SPECIES NAME COMMON NAME RANK RANK STATUS BRYOPSIDA Callicladium haldanianum Callicladium Moss G5 SNR Leptobryum pyriforme Leptobryum Moss G5 SNR Rhodobryum roseum Rose Moss G5 S1? Trachyxiphium heteroicum Trachyxiphium Moss G2? S1? EQUISETOPSIDA Equisetum arvense Field Horsetail G5 S1S2 FILICOPSIDA Adiantum capillus-veneris Southern Maidenhair-fern G5 S2 Asplenium -
Lamiales – Synoptical Classification Vers
Lamiales – Synoptical classification vers. 2.6.2 (in prog.) Updated: 12 April, 2016 A Synoptical Classification of the Lamiales Version 2.6.2 (This is a working document) Compiled by Richard Olmstead With the help of: D. Albach, P. Beardsley, D. Bedigian, B. Bremer, P. Cantino, J. Chau, J. L. Clark, B. Drew, P. Garnock- Jones, S. Grose (Heydler), R. Harley, H.-D. Ihlenfeldt, B. Li, L. Lohmann, S. Mathews, L. McDade, K. Müller, E. Norman, N. O’Leary, B. Oxelman, J. Reveal, R. Scotland, J. Smith, D. Tank, E. Tripp, S. Wagstaff, E. Wallander, A. Weber, A. Wolfe, A. Wortley, N. Young, M. Zjhra, and many others [estimated 25 families, 1041 genera, and ca. 21,878 species in Lamiales] The goal of this project is to produce a working infraordinal classification of the Lamiales to genus with information on distribution and species richness. All recognized taxa will be clades; adherence to Linnaean ranks is optional. Synonymy is very incomplete (comprehensive synonymy is not a goal of the project, but could be incorporated). Although I anticipate producing a publishable version of this classification at a future date, my near- term goal is to produce a web-accessible version, which will be available to the public and which will be updated regularly through input from systematists familiar with taxa within the Lamiales. For further information on the project and to provide information for future versions, please contact R. Olmstead via email at [email protected], or by regular mail at: Department of Biology, Box 355325, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA. -
Artigo Departamento De Tecnologia De Alimentos, Universidade Federal De Viçosa, Av
Quim. Nova, Vol. 34, No. 9, 1550-1555, 2011 CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF ESSENTIAL OILS FROM VERBENACEAE SPECIES: ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF (E)-CARYOPHYLLENE AND GERMACRENE-D Ricardo M. Montanari, Luiz C. A. Barbosa,* Antonio J. Demuner e Cleber J. Silva Departamento de Química, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Av. PH Rolfs, s/n, 36570-000 Viçosa – MG, Brasil Larissa S. Carvalho e Nélio J. Andrade Artigo Departamento de Tecnologia de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Av. PH Rolfs, s/n, 36570-000 Viçosa – MG, Brasil Recebido em 7/1/11; aceito em 4/5/11; publicado na web em 29/6/11 Volatile oils from the leaves of Verbenaceae species Aloysia virgata, Lantana camara, Lantana trifolia, Lantana montevidensis, Lippia brasiliensis and Lippia sericea were investigated for its chemical composition and antibacterial activity. The volatile oils were characterized by a high content of sesquiterpenes of which (E)-caryophyllene (10-35%), germacrene-D (5-46%) and bicyclogermacrene (7-17%) were the major components for all studied species. For the flowers, a higher concentration of monoterpenes was observed for the species L. camara, L. trifolia and L. brasiliensis. These compounds probably act as attractive to specific pollinators. The volatile oils fromA. virgata was the most active, exhibiting moderate antimicrobial activity against the bacteria Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus and Escherichia coli. Keywords: Lippia spp; Aloysia virgata; Lantana spp. INTRODUCTION related plants,11 which may contribute to the implementation of more rational approaches for the search of new substances with The Verbenaceae comprises several species with medicinal and potential economic interest. This hypothesis supports the search for ornamental uses, especially those of the genera Aloysia Palau, Lan- antimicrobial substances among Verbenaceae species. -
Biological Inventories P Rapid
biological R Rapid Biological Inventories apid Biological Inventories rapid inventories 11 Instituciones Participantes / Participating Institutions :11 The Field Museum Perú: Yavarí Centro de Conservación, Investigación y Manejo de Perú: Yavarí Áreas Naturales (CIMA–Cordillera Azul) Wildlife Conservation Society–Peru Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology Rainforest Conservation Fund Museo de Historia Natural de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos Financiado por / Partial funding by Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation The Field Museum Environmental & Conservation Programs 1400 South Lake Shore Drive Chicago, Illinois 60605-2496, USA T 312.665.7430 F 312.665.7433 www.fieldmuseum.org/rbi THE FIELD MUSEUM PERÚ: Yavarí fig.2 La planicie aluvial del Yavarí es un rico mosaico de bosques inundados y pantanos. Las comunidades de árboles de la reserva propuesta (línea punteada en blanco) se encuentran entre las más diversas del planeta. En esta imagen compuesta de satélite (1999/2001) resaltamos la Reserva Comunal Tamshiyacu-Tahuayo (línea punteada en gris) junto con los ríos y pueblos cercanos a los sitios del inventario biológico rápido. The Yavarí floodplain is a rich mosaic of flooded forest and swamps. Tree communities of the proposed reserve (dotted white line) are among the most diverse on the planet. In this composite satellite image of 1999/2001 we highlight the Reserva Comunal Tamshiyacu-Tahuayo (dotted grey line) along with the rivers and towns close to the rapid inventory sites. Iquitos río Manití río Orosa río Esperanza -
Diplomarbeit
DIPLOMARBEIT Titel der Diplomarbeit „Development of unisexual flowers and dioecy in Schlegelia (Schlegeliaceae, Lamiales)“ verfasst von Lisa Maurer angestrebter akademischer Grad Magistra der Naturwissenschaften (Mag. rer. nat.) Wien, 2013 Studienkennzahl: A 190 445 333 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Lehramtsstudium UF Biologie und Umweltkunde, UF Deutsch Betreuerin / Betreuer: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Jürg Schönenberger Table of contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 2. Material and Methods ....................................................................................................... 4 2.1. Field observations ..................................................................................................... 4 2.1.1. Methods ................................................................................................................ 5 2.2. Investigated individuals .......................................................................................... 7 2.3. Morphological analysis ............................................................................................ 9 2.4. Terminology ............................................................................................................. 10 3. Results ............................................................................................................................... 10 3.1. Breeding System and general description ........................................................