DOCSLIB.ORG

Small Modular Reactors: What, Why and When? (SMR2016)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Small Modular Reactors: What, Why and When? (SMR2016) Small Modular Reactors: What, Why and When? (SMR2016) Session 1 – SMRs: The UK – Why? Session Chairs: Andrew Sherry (NNL) and John Molyneaux (Rolls-Royce) The UK has expressed an interest in the potential deployment of SMR technology as a means to help address the energy trilema – the need to ensure a secure and affordable supply of low carbon energy. SMRs could complement the UK’s large-scale nuclear reactor programme including existing and new nuclear build. This first session will explore why SMR’s could help address the key components of the energy trilema for the UK, providing a perspective from domestic and international experts. The session will include an introduction from me, and presentations covering: (a) techno-economic assessment (Miranda Kirschel), (b) low carbon energy (Mike Middleton), (c) energy security (Candida Whitmill) and (d) international perspective from OECD (Jaejoo Ha). The session will end with a panel session with you all on the stage together, which will provide the audience an opportunity to ask further, more general questions. Talk 1: Andrew Sherry (NNL) Professor Andrew Sherry is Chief Scientist at the UK’s National Nuclear Laboratory where he leads the development and implementation of the science and technology strategy supporting both Government and industry. He holds a Chair in Materials Performance at The University of Manchester where he leads research into materials, manufacturing and structural integrity of nuclear plant. He is a Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering, a Fellow of the Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining and a Chartered Engineer. SMRs provide a new approach to nuclear power. Unlike the large reactors about to be built in the UK, they do not exploit economies of scale; they have an output about 25% that of large reactors. SMRs target economies of a different kind: compact designs that maximise modular build in factories to enhance the quality arising from a controlled working environment; faster construction times that lower capital cost and reduce financial risk. SMRs can deliver baseload power, balance the variable output from renewables and (or) supply district heating. SMRs also make passive safety a feature of their design to reduce the need for operator intervention to mitigate an unexpected event. The ‘energy case’ for SMRs reflects their potential to complement the new nuclear build programme by providing additional baseload power, balancing the output of renewables by varying power as needed and supplying district heat if built closer to centres of population. The ‘economic case’ reflects the potential national and international market. Capital costs per unit power will be higher for a first-of-a-kind iPWR than for large reactors though this should reduce for multiple units due to nth-of-a-kind learning, shorter construction times and reduced financial risk. Effective public engagement will be crucial to the deployment of SMRs in the UK, and a strategy is needed to build confidence and acceptance of new technology potentially deployed on new sites. Talk 2: Ray McSweeny (Ernst & Young) Ray is a Director in EY and lead’s EY’s Energy Strategy practice and his specialisms are in high value areas such as new industry and product development, emerging markets (Africa in particular), cost reduction, customer service, operational improvement, and operational productivity and also in tomorrow's opportunity areas such as digitisation, innovation, advanced manufacturing and internet of things. Ray led the Comprehensive Analysis and Assessment, as well as the EY led Cost Reduction study as part of the DECC commissioned Small Modular Reactor Techno-Economic assessment (TEA). He was also lead author of “Getting Ready for Shale” – an analysis of the UK Oilfield Services supply chain and requirement for investment. Ray has a degree in Chemical Engineering from University College Dublin (1999) and an MBA from Edinburgh University. (2007). The SMR Techno-Economic Assessment The TEA: why it was commissioned, the context and drivers The overall programme and process we undertook Engaging stakeholders and other considerations Assessing the economics – the EY modelling approach The value of the study and next steps Talk 3: Mike Middleton (ETI) Mike Middleton is the Strategy Manager for Nuclear at the Energy Technologies Institute. Mike joined the ETI on secondment from the Rolls-Royce in 2013 utilising his previous experience including: Facilities Director and Naval Base Design Director at the UK Clyde Naval Base, a number of roles at Sellafield including Infrastructure Director; and 3 years with Jacobs Engineering in the UK. New nuclear power stations could form an important part of a UK transition to a low carbon economy, but there is a range of constraints which could impact their rate of deployment and their ultimate capacity limit in the UK. The ETI has completed two multi-phase projects intended to better understand the constraints and opportunities for new nuclear: • Power Plant Siting Study to identify the UK stock of sites suitable for large nuclear power stations as well as further site capacity suitable for Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) • System Requirements For Alternative Nuclear Technologies – to identify necessary technical and business case requirements for SMRs to be attractive within a UK low carbon energy system The ETI’s internationally peer reviewed whole energy system model is used to test a wide range of transition scenarios which deliver compliance with the greenhouse gas abatement requirements of the Climate Change Act 2008. Evaluation of these scenarios helps to identify the technologies likely to contribute to a transition with acceptable risk and cost when compared to UK GDP. The results from the two projects described above have been applied to scenarios tested within the UK energy system model. This has delivered new insights into the potential deployment of both large nuclear power stations and Small Modular Reactors in the UK. Mike Middleton will summarise the results from these projects and the insights gained. Mike will also update on further ETI SMR project work related to potential UK SMR deployment to: • Suggest potential operational capabilities required of a UK deployed SMR to maximise exploitation of the “economies of multiples” • Identify desirable characteristics for a “first of a kind” SMR deployment site in the UK • Identify potential enabling activities to deliver first operations of a UK SMR by 2030 The talk will point to the potential for Small Modular Reactors to become a valuable UK low carbon technology and for the potential for the UK to be more of a participant than merely a customer country. ---COFFEE BREAK--- Talk 4: Candida Whitmill (Penultimate Power UK Limited) Candida Whitmill is the Managing Director of Penultimate Power UK, a company set up in the North East to overcome the political, technical and financial challenges to bring SMRs to commercialisation in the UK for both the domestic and export market, utilising UK nuclear expertise in research, development and the supply chain. Previously, Candida was Chairman of the UK Tidal Forum and worked closely with Government and stakeholders on the £9m Feasibility Study on the Severn Barrage and alternative tidal options. She was an Energy advisor to the Secretary of State at Department of Trade & Industry for four years. Candida has had several papers published on SMRs and their role in the UK’s energy portfolio. Why SMRs Energy Security in the context of SMRs What do we mean by energy security – the short-term and long-term perspectives? Lack of energy security – the social and economic consequences Demand – How much do we need? What will be the impact of decarbonisation? Supply – SMR technology capacities and constraints, energy markets, carbon pricing Challenges – Political continuity, allocation of risks, protecting the revenue stream Talk 5: Jaejoo Ha (OECD) Dr. Ha received his bachelor's degree in Nuclear Engineering from Seoul National University and master's and Ph.D.’s degree in Nuclear Engineering from the Ohio State University in USA. Dr. Ha started his career at DOOSAN Heavy Industries and construction Co. in 1982, and joined KAERI (Korean Atomic Energy Research Institute) in 1992. He worked as Director of Integrated Safety Assessment Division, and then 4 Vice President positions in Nuclear Safety Research, Nuclear Basic Science and Technology, Research Reactor Utilization and Development, and Advanced Reactor Development. During his career in KAERI, He played the important role to establish several critical research facilities such as ATLAS (integral thermal hydraulic experimental facility), FTL (Fuel test loop) and CNRF (Cold Neutron Research Facility) of HANARO research reactor, and SMART-ITL (SMART Integral Test Loop). Also he played the key role to export a research reactor to Jordan, and obtain Standard Design Approval of SMART reactor, 100MWe SMR, in 2012, and has lead the cooperation in designing and building SMART in Saudi Arabia. He joined OECD/NEA starting from Mar. 9th of 21015 as Head of Nuclear Development Division, and is leading a number of important programs regarding technical and economical aspects of nuclear energy and fuel cycle, and the role of nuclear energy in the overall energy mix and in a low-carbon economy. • Pros and Cons of SMR: Well understood, but will summarize/revisit them shortly. Will address other areas such as co-generation and harmonization with renewables. • Perspective on Market: There are many
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nuclear Power
    No.59 z iii "Ill ~ 2 er0 Ill Ill 0 Nuclear Family Pia nning p3 Chernobyl Broadsheet ·, _ I. _ . ~~~~ George Pritchar d speaks CONTENTS COMMENT The important nuclear development since the Nuclear Family Planning 3 last SCRAM Journal was the Government's The CEGB's plans, and the growing opposition, after Sizewell B by go ahead for Sizewell B: the world's first HUGH RICHARDS. reactor order since Chernobyl, and Britain's News 4-6 first since the go ahead was given to Torness Accidents Will Happen 1 and Heysham 2 in 1978. Of great concern is Hinkley Seismic Shocker 8-9 the CEGB's announced intention to build "a A major article on seismic safety of nuclear plants in which JAMES small fanilty• of PWRs, starting with Hinkley GARRETT reveals that Hinkley Point C. At the time of the campaign In the Point sits on a geological fault. south west to close the Hinkley A Magnox Trouble at Trawsfynydd 10-11 station, and .a concerted push in Scotland to A summary of FoE's recent report on increasing radiation levels from prevent the opening of Torness, another Trawsfynydd's by PATRICK GREEN. nuclear announcement is designed to divide Pandora's POX 12 and demoralise the opposition. But, it should The debate over plutonium transport make us more determined. The article on the to and from Dounreay continues by facing page gives us hope: the local PETE MUTTON. authorities on Severnside are joining forces CHERNOBYL BROADSHEET to oppose Hinkley C, and hopefully they will Cock-ups and Cover-ups work closely with local authorities in other "Sacrificed to • • • Nuclear Power" threatened areas - Lothian Region, The Soviet Experience Northumberland, the County Council Coalition "An Agonising Decision• 13 against waste dumping and the Nuclear Free GEORGE PRITCHARD explains why Zones - to formulate a national anti-nuclear he left Greenpeoce and took a job strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of a Severn Barrage a REPORT PREPARED for the NGO STEERING GROUP
    Analysis of a Severn Barrage A REPORT PREPARED FOR THE NGO STEERING GROUP June 2008 © Frontier Economics Ltd, London. i Frontier Economics | June 2008 Analysis of a Severn Barrage Executive summary......................................................................................iv 1 Introduction .........................................................................................7 1.1 Background...................................................................................................7 1.2 Overview.......................................................................................................8 Part 1: What is the role of Government? 2 Approach ..............................................................................................9 3 The role of Government ..................................................................... 11 3.1 Rationale..................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Objectives .................................................................................................. 16 Part 2: How does a barrage compare? 4 Approach ............................................................................................ 19 4.1 General background ................................................................................. 19 4.2 Overview of approach to modelling ...................................................... 21 5 Analysis and discussion .....................................................................26 5.1 Sensitivity
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Renewables
    January 2009 Number 324 MARINE RENEWABLES Britain has an EU mandated target to meet 15% of its account for less than 0.1% of the energy produced energy requirements from renewable sources by 2020. worldwide. The UK has the largest wave and tidal resources in Europe, so marine renewables are a candidate for Figure 1: Wave and Tidal Resources in contributing to this target. Around 15-20% of the UK’s the UK: 2 Coloured bands show wave electricity could potentially be produced from marine resources, with purple denoting the 1 renewable sources, but the technology is not mature. greatest resource. Red circles show This POSTnote considers the technologies available and some of the most significant tidal the environmental, economic and technological power sites. Tidal resources are closer challenges involved in their deployment. to shore than wave. Background Tidal Power • ‘Tidal stream’ devices use the flow of water due to tides to generate electricity. • ‘Tidal range’ devices use the change in height of water Government Support due to tides, using principles similar to a hydroelectric The Renewables Advisory Board (RAB), a government dam. There are only a few tidal ‘barrages’ (see Box 1). advisory body, suggests that to meet the EU target, 32% Tidal lagoons (structures built at sea to capture water of UK electricity must come from renewables by 2020. at high tides) are also possible. The government has set a further target to cut carbon Wave Power emissions by 80% by 2050. This has increased interest Wave devices use the motion of water caused by winds in all low carbon energy sources, including marine.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH WEST ENGLAND and the WAVE HUB 10 July 2009 NICK HARRINGTON – HEAD of MARINE ENERGY SOUTH WEST RDA WAVE & TIDAL RESOURCE
    SOUTH WEST ENGLAND AND THE WAVE HUB 10 July 2009 NICK HARRINGTON – HEAD OF MARINE ENERGY SOUTH WEST RDA WAVE & TIDAL RESOURCE • Could provide 15% - 20% of UK demand • European resource 290GW • Worldwide annual revenues of €65 - €200 billion WAVE POWER LEVELS IN kW/m OF CREST LENGTH IN EUROPEAN WATERS Source: Wave Energy Utilization in Europe (European Thematic Network on Marine Energy) TIDAL RESOURCE IN SW ENGLAND DECC TIDAL RESOURCE IN SW ENGLAND Marine “Shoots” Barrage Current 1GW Turbines “SeaGEN” * “Severn” Barrage 8GW “Outer” Barrage 15GW SOUTH WEST WAVE RESOURCE DECC WAVE HUB Source: JP Kenny WAVE HUB WAVE HUB PROVIDES • Consented sea area • Grid connected 5MW per berth at 11kV • Monitoring and testing • Opportunities to collaborate • Access to suppliers and research base • Experience of operations • Can be upgraded to 50MW with 33kV operation UK ROUTE TO COMMERCIALISATION R&D NaREC Demonstration Initial prototype EMEC Refined prototype Wave Hub Pre- commercial device Market entry with commercial product Market penetration TIMETABLE • Landowner agreements signed- June 2009 • Funding unconditional - June 2009 • Developer commitments - June 2009 • Operating and capital budgets confirmed - July 2009 • Decision to proceed - July 2009 • Order sub-sea cable - July 2009 • Set up operating company - Summer 2009 • Onshore works - Autumn 2009 • Tender installation contracts - Autumn/Winter 2009 • Cable and equipment delivery - Spring 2010 • Installation and commissioning - Summer 2010 CHALLENGES Devices • Demonstrate and improve performance
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    DRAFT ISSUES REPORT A joint project by the Environment Agency and the Severn Estuary Strategy November 1996 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 103433 ASIANTAETH YR AMGTLCHEDD CYMRU E n v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y w a l e s GWASANAETH LLYFRGELL A GWYBODAETH CENEDLAETHOL NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE PR1F SWYDDFA/MAIN OFFICE Ty Cambria/Cambria House 29 Heol Casnew ydd/29 Newport Road Caerdydd/Cardiff CF24 OTP ENVIRONMENT a g e n c y WELSH REGION CATALOGUE ACCESSION CODE_AO_L: CLASS N O . ______________ M151 Lydney Newport^ n Caldicot Tusker jMonks Ditcl Rock T h o rn b u ry Porion Wjefsh Llantwit Grounds v Major Cardiff M id dle Denny Dinas„ Grounds Athan ^0*2. A von mouth Portishead Clevedo S cully Island Lanaford Grounds t i n # Holm Bristol Steep Hotm Weston-super-Mare KEY Minehead Boundary Built up area Burnham-on-Sea Major River Canal Motorway W illiton A Road Railway Sandbank Bridgwater Contents 1. Introduction.......................................................................................................... 1 2. Overview ........... .......................... ........................ ............................................. 7 3 Planning and management in the estuary. ..................................................... 25 4. Urban development, infrastructure & transport.................................................... 43 5. Agriculture and rural land use ............................................................................. 53 6. Coastal defence ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Severn Tidal Power
    Department of Energy and Climate Change SEVERN TIDAL POWER Feasibility Study Conclusions and Summary Report OCTOBER 2010 Severn Tidal Power Feasibility Study: Conclusions and Summary Report Contents Executive summary .................................................................................................... 4 How to respond ....................................................................................................... 9 1. Background .......................................................................................................... 10 The UK’s wave and tidal opportunity ..................................................................... 10 Tidal Stream ...................................................................................................... 12 Wave ................................................................................................................. 12 Tidal range ......................................................................................................... 13 The Severn ........................................................................................................... 14 Schemes studied .................................................................................................. 16 Progress since public consultation ........................................................................ 18 2. The scale of the challenge ................................................................................... 21 2020 – Renewable Energy Strategy ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Severn Estuary Forum Report 2007Compressed
    2nd Severn Estuary Forum Thursday 7th June 2007 Walton Park Hotel, Clevedon Working Together: The Future of the Severn Estuary A conference to discuss issues affecting the future of the Severn Estuary Forum Report The Severn Estuary Partnership is funded by a wide range of local authorities and statutory agencies, which are not all shown here. The organisations above have provided additional funding to support the Severn Estuary Forum. About the Severn Estuary Forum The Strategy for the Severn Estuary (2001) identified the need for an annual Severn Estuary Forum. This is the 2nd Forum Conference for the Severn Estuary, hosted by the Severn Estuary Partnership. The Severn Estuary Forum brings together people from all interests to work together for the sustainable future of the Severn Estuary. Representatives from government, industry and Severn Estuary communities are invited to discuss common interests. This year’s theme for the Forum is Working Together: the Future of the Severn Estuary. The Forum will provide a platform for the exchange of information and debate. The discussion and recommendations from the Forum will guide the future work of the Severn Estuary Partnership. Participation in the Forum allows you to: · share information and discuss the regional and local implications of current issues; · meet new people with similar interests who share a concern for the Severn Estuary; · meet people with different perspectives who share an interest in the Severn Estuary; · learn something new about the Severn Estuary and the people who manage and use its resources. We have worked towards providing a lively day of informative talks, interactive debate and an opportunity for informal exchange with neighbouring people & organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report 3 - Severn Barrage
    Tidal Power in the UK Research Report 3 - Severn barrage proposals An evidence-based report by Black & Veatch for the Sustainable Development Commission October 2007 Tidal Power in the UK Research Report 3 – Review of Severn Barrage Proposals Final Report July 2007 In association with ABPmer, IPA Consulting Ltd., Econnect Consulting Ltd., Clive Baker, and Graham Sinden (Environmental Change Institute) Sustainable Development Commission Review of Severn Barrage Proposals REVIEW OF SEVERN BARRAGE PROPOSALS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This evidence-based report has been prepared for the Sustainable Development Commission (SDC) as research report 3 to support and inform the SDC’s Tidal Power in the UK project. Background Following an introduction to the importance of the Severn estuary, an overview is provided of the extensive studies carried out on the Severn estuary mainly over the last 25 years covering both single basin and two-basin barrage schemes. The studies have shown consistently that tidal power schemes requiring long lengths of embankment (two-basin schemes) result in significantly higher unit costs of energy than equivalent schemes where length of embankment is kept to a minimum. The study considers two schemes for more detailed analysis as follows: • The Cardiff-Weston barrage, as developed and promoted by the Severn Tidal Power Group (STPG) and located between Cardiff, Wales and Weston-super-Mare, Somerset, South West England • The Shoots barrage (formerly the English Stones barrage) as presently proposed by Parsons Brinkerhoff (PB) and located just downstream of the second Severn crossing Studies using various models have shown ebb generation is the preferred mode of operation at the Shoots barrage sites and ebb generation with flood pumping optimises energy output at Cardiff- Weston providing about 3% more energy output than simple ebb generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report Proposed Nuclear Power Station Near Oldbury-On-Severn South Gloucestershire
    NOVEMBER 2009 BRITAIN FOR WORKING ENERGY A UK company of E.ON and RWE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SCOPING REPORT PROPOSED NUCLEAR POWER STATION NEAR OLDBURY-ON-SEVERN SOUTH GLOUCESTERSHIRE Horizon Nuclear Power Limited Proposed Nuclear Power Station at Oldbury Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report November 2009 Contents 1 Introduction 5 Background 5 Site Description 5 Project Outline 6 Purpose of the Scoping Report 7 Objectives of the Scoping Report 8 Scoping Report Structure 9 Strategic Context 10 Approach to the EIA 12 Generic Design Assessment 12 Strategic Siting Assessment 13 Consents Required 15 Financing Arrangements for Waste and Decommissioning Costs 17 Justification Process 17 2 Project Description 18 Introduction 18 Reactor type 18 Cooling water 19 Connection to the National Grid 20 Development boundaries 20 Access 21 Radioactive waste storage 21 Alternatives 22 Outline of construction activities 22 Operation and decommissioning timescales 23 3 Approach to the EIA 24 Introduction 24 EIA Guidance 24 Project Description 25 Alternatives 25 Baseline 25 Assessment of Effects 26 Form of the Environmental Statement 28 4 EIA Topics 29 Introduction 29 Geology, hydrogeology and soils 30 RPS 6587 Oldbury Scoping Report i November 2009 Horizon Nuclear Power Limited Surface water and flooding 33 Landscape and visual amenity 35 Ecology and nature conservation 38 Archaeology and cultural heritage 44 Traffic and transport 47 Noise and vibration 50 Air quality and dust 52 Public access and recreation 53 Socio-economics 55 5 Health, Safety and Security 57 Health and Safety 57 Security 57 6 Way Forward 59 Environmental Impact Assessment 59 Consultation 61 Appropriate Assessment 62 Have Your Say 63 Consultees 63 References 67 Figures 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefits of Integrating Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology Into the UK Economy
    The benefits of integrating hydrogen and fuel cell technology into the UK economy Global opportunity, with significant growth The global fuel cell market could be worth over $26bn in 2020 and over $180bn in 2050. The UK share of this market could be $1bn in 2020 rising to $19bn in 2050. [1] Overall fuel cell system shipments (excluding toys and education kits) in 2011 were 24,600 – growing by 39% compared to 2010, led by increases in stationary power generation. Annual megawatts shipped were over 100MW for the first time as commercialisation of the industry took hold. [2] In 2012, it is forecast that annual shipments of fuel cell systems will triple - reaching over 78,000 shipments for the full year. Annual megawatts shipped are expected to grow by over 60%, to around 176MW. Increases are expected across all applications. [2] By the end of 2011, 215 hydrogen refuelling stations were in operation worldwide with twelve new stations being added that year. [2] Hydrogen refuelling stations will continue to be added in 2012 as early markets gear up for the commercial release of fuel cell electric vehicles. Germany, California and Japan have announced plans for more than 200 stations between them by 2016. [2] Delivering green jobs A recent survey by the UK Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Association and Energy Generation and Supply KTN revealed that UK fuel cell and hydrogen companies are expecting cumulative annual revenues to reach £1bn by 2020, bringing over 2,200 fuel cell and hydrogen related jobs to the UK. It is estimated that the European fuel cell and hydrogen industry already supports over 9,000 jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the Severn Barrage
    Wildlife Trust Living Landscape Herritage SACs, SPAs & Reserve Scheme Coast Ramsar sites LOCATIONS CARDIFF-WESTON SHOOTS BEACHLEY WELSH GROUNDS BRIDGWATER BAY Bristol Weston-super-Mare Minehead Exmoor National Park Foreword The University of Exeter is known for world leading research into ‘Climate Change and Sustainable Futures’ and has recently established the Environment and Sustainability Institute in Cornwall to further research in environmental sustainability. In addition, the University is committed to developing sustainability literate graduates. In 2010, the Big Dilemmas Project was launched with the view to develop a better understanding of the sustainability dilemmas that society is trying to grapple with. Twenty of the brightest students from across the University were selected to form a think-tank. Working with stakeholders and lead academics., they focused on the theme ‘ The Future of Renewable Energy in the UK’ and drew lessons from the developments of the Severn Estuary tidal energy schemes. Under the previous Government five different constructions for energy generation were evaluated. Although the scheme has been shelved for now, it might be resurrected in the future in one shape or another. This makes it an interesting case study for policy makers, investors and activists alike. The think-tank researched challenges around energy security, protection of biodiversity, public engagement and economics. In this pamphlet the students are presenting their conclusions* and are offering some insightful propositions on how to approach complex sustainability dilemmas. I echo Martin Wright’s (Forum for the Future) comment at the final Big Dilemmas symposium: “If we want to move towards a sustainable society, we need to win hearts and minds.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Meters: Progress Or Delay?
    House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee Smart meters: progress or delay? Ninth Report of Session 2014–15 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 3 March 2015 HC 665 Published on 7 March 2015 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Energy and Climate Change Committee The Energy and Climate Change Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Energy and Climate Change and associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Tim Yeo MP (Conservative, South Suffolk) (Chair) Dan Byles MP (Conservative, North Warwickshire) Ian Lavery MP (Labour, Wansbeck) Dr Phillip Lee MP (Conservative, Bracknell) Rt Hon Mr Peter Lilley MP (Conservative, Hitchin and Harpenden) Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Christopher Pincher MP (Conservative, Tamworth) John Robertson MP (Labour, Glasgow North West) Sir Robert Smith MP (Liberal Democrat, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) Graham Stringer MP (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/ecc and by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the inquiry page of the Committee’s website. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Farrah Bhatti (Clerk), Vinay Talwar (Second Clerk), Tom Leveridge (Committee Specialist), Marion Ferrat (Committee Specialist), Shane Pathmanathan (Senior Committee Assistant), Amy Vistuer (Committee Support Assistant), and Nick Davies (Media Officer).
    [Show full text]