DOCSLIB.ORG

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation and the Arab League

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Organization of Islamic Cooperation and the Arab League Chapter 6 The Organization of Islamic Cooperation and the Arab League Elisabeth Johansson-Nogués The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC),1 with 57 member states and representing approximately 1.5 billion Muslims, is the second largest intergov- ernmental organization in the world after the UN.2 The OIC was accepted as an ‘observer member’ in the UN General Assembly and of its subsidiary organs in 1975 and it is the only UN group whose unifying denominator is religion. The League of Arab States (Arab League; LAS) is a much smaller grouping in comparison. It consists of 22 member countries and represents an estimated 356 million inhabitants of diverse confessions.3 The Arab League is one of the oldest regional groupings in the UN setting, having been present at the 1945 San Francisco Conference. The LAS Secretary General was invited to attend sessions of the General Assembly as an observer in 1950.4 This chapter will outline the group composition, function, internal dynam- ics and key issues for these two different organizations within the framework of the UN. It will use the analytical framework developed by Laatikainen (chapter 2) on the role of political and informal groups in multilateral settings to derive further insights. The chapter is structured in the following manner. The first section will provide insights into group composition and functioning. 1 OIC member states: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Benin, Brunei-Darussalam, Burkina-Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Comoros, Cote d’Ivoire, Djibouti, Egypt, Gabon, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Libya, Maldives, Mali, Malaysia, Mauritania, Morocco, Niger, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, Suriname, Syria (suspended since 2012), Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Togo, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan and Yemen. 2 This chapter falls within the VISIONS research project (Visions and practices of geopolitics in the European Union and its neighborhood) funded by the National R+D Plan of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (CSO2017-82622-P). 3 LAS member states: Algeria, Bahrain, Comoros, Djibouti, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria (suspended since 2011), Tunisia, United Arab Emirates and Yemen. 4 C. Maksoud, “Diminished Sovereignty, Enhanced Sovereignty: United Nations-Arab League Relations at 50.” The Middle East Journal 49, no. 4 (1995): 582–94. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2020 | doi:10.1163/9789004384446_007 98 Johansson-Nogués The second and third sections will address participant perception and key is- sues/agenda, respectively. The final section will test the analytical parameters of political groups and explore how OIC and LAS map out as political groups in the multilateral context. 1 OIC and LAS Group Composition and Functioning The Organization of Islamic Conference came about in the aftermath of the 1967 Six-Day War and the 1969 attack on the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem, one of the holiest sites in Islam. Muslim leaders from around the world met in Rabat in 1969 with the intent to form an entity which could become ‘a collective voice for Muslims and protect Muslim interests’.5 In 1973 the OIC Constitution came into effect and the intergovernmental organization’s ability to act as a recognized group within the UN was confirmed in 1975. The entity changed its name to Organization of Islamic Cooperation in 2011. In terms of its function- ing, the OIC rests on a light institutional structure. The Islamic Summit (Kings, Heads of State and Government) meets every three years to consider major initiatives. The Council of Foreign Ministers holds annual meetings to review policy implementation and to propose concrete areas of cooperation. The Council of Foreign Ministers is assisted by the General Secretariat, its perma- nent committees and some specialized organs.6 In the UN setting, OIC coordi- nation is supported by the different OIC delegations accredited to the United Nations, whether in New York, Geneva, Vienna or Paris. The Ambassadors of OIC member states to the UN hold monthly meetings on the first Tuesday of each month to discuss current issues on the OIC and UN agenda. The monthly rotating Chair of the OIC Ambassadors is tasked with chairing meetings and introducing UN resolutions on the OIC’s behalf. The monthly chair also acts as coordinator for the co-sponsors of UN resolutions and the drafter of resolu- tions, sometimes in coordination with previous or future chairs. The organiza- tion, it has been noted, is run on a modest budget, composed of mandatory dues from member states and additional voluntary funding.7 5 N. S. Sheikh, The New Politics of Islam: Pan-Islamism Foreign Policy in a World of States. New York: Routledge Curzon, 2003, p. 36. 6 OIC permanent committees include the Al-Quds Committee, on matters related to Jerusalem, and three committees concerned with science and technology, economy and trade, and information and culture. Specialized organs under the OIC banner include the Islamic Development Bank and the Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 7 The mandatory dues are not regularly paid and hence the OIC budget has suffered from fre- quent shortfalls. I. Hossain, “The Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC): Nature, Role, and the Issues.” Journal of Third World Studies 29, no. 1 (Spring 2012): 287–314..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Destruction of Religious and Cultural Sites I. Introduction The
    Mapping the Saudi State, Chapter 7: The Destruction of Religious and Cultural Sites I. Introduction The Ministry for Islamic Affairs, Endowments, Da’wah, and Guidance, commonly abbreviated to the Ministry of Islamic Affairs (MOIA), supervises and regulates religious activity in Saudi Arabia. Whereas the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice (CPVPV) directly enforces religious law, as seen in Mapping the Saudi State, Chapter 1,1 the MOIA is responsible for the administration of broader religious services. According to the MOIA, its primary duties include overseeing the coordination of Islamic societies and organizations, the appointment of clergy, and the maintenance and construction of mosques.2 Yet, despite its official mission to “preserve Islamic values” and protect mosques “in a manner that fits their sacred status,”3 the MOIA is complicit in a longstanding government campaign against the peninsula’s traditional heritage – Islamic or otherwise. Since 1925, the Al Saud family has overseen the destruction of tombs, mosques, and historical artifacts in Jeddah, Medina, Mecca, al-Khobar, Awamiyah, and Jabal al-Uhud. According to the Islamic Heritage Research Foundation, between just 1985 and 2014 – through the MOIA’s founding in 1993 –the government demolished 98% of the religious and historical sites located in Saudi Arabia.4 The MOIA’s seemingly contradictory role in the destruction of Islamic holy places, commentators suggest, is actually the byproduct of an equally incongruous alliance between the forces of Wahhabism and commercialism.5 Compelled to acknowledge larger demographic and economic trends in Saudi Arabia – rapid population growth, increased urbanization, and declining oil revenues chief among them6 – the government has increasingly worked to satisfy both the Wahhabi religious establishment and the kingdom’s financial elite.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Al-Shafi'i, Kitab Al-Umm1 This Is a Template for a Standard Set Of
    Al-Shafi’i, Kitab al-Umm1 If any one of you speaks improperly of Muhammad—may God bless This is a template for a standard set of guarantees that the Imam, the and save him—of the Book of God, or of His religion, he forfeits the supreme religious leader of Islam (then the Abbasid caliph in Baghdad), protection [dhimma] of God, of the Commander of the Faithful, and of all might make to Jews and Christians living under his care in a specific city. It dates from the 700s to the 800s. the Muslims; he has contravened the conditions upon which he was given his safe-conduct; his property and his life are at the disposal of the If the Imam wishes to write a document for the poll tax (jizya) of non- Commander of the Faithful, like the property and lives of the people of the Muslims, he should write: house of war [dar al-harb]. In the name of God, the Merciful and the Compassionate. This is a If one of them commits fornication with a Muslim woman or goes document written by the servant of God so-and-so,2 Commander of the through a form of marriage with her or robs a Muslim on the highway or Faithful, on the 2nd of the month of Rabi’l, in the year such-and-such, to subverts a Muslim from his religion or gives aid to those who made war so-and-so son of so-and-so, the Christian, of the descendants of such-and- against the Muslims by fighting with them or by showing them the weak such, of the people of the city of so-and-so.
    [Show full text]
  • Temple in Jerusalem Coordinates: 31.77765, 35.23547 from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Log in / create account article discussion edit this page history Temple in Jerusalem Coordinates: 31.77765, 35.23547 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Bet HaMikdash ; "The Holy House"), refers to Part of a series of articles on ,שדקמה תיב :The Temple in Jerusalem or Holy Temple (Hebrew a series of structures located on the Temple Mount (Har HaBayit) in the old city of Jerusalem. Historically, two Jews and Judaism navigation temples were built at this location, and a future Temple features in Jewish eschatology. According to classical Main page Jewish belief, the Temple (or the Temple Mount) acts as the figurative "footstool" of God's presence (Heb. Contents "shechina") in the physical world. Featured content Current events The First Temple was built by King Solomon in seven years during the 10th century BCE, culminating in 960 [1] [2] Who is a Jew? ∙ Etymology ∙ Culture Random article BCE. It was the center of ancient Judaism. The Temple replaced the Tabernacle of Moses and the Tabernacles at Shiloh, Nov, and Givon as the central focus of Jewish faith. This First Temple was destroyed by Religion search the Babylonians in 587 BCE. Construction of a new temple was begun in 537 BCE; after a hiatus, work resumed Texts 520 BCE, with completion occurring in 516 BCE and dedication in 515. As described in the Book of Ezra, Ethnicities Go Search rebuilding of the Temple was authorized by Cyrus the Great and ratified by Darius the Great. Five centuries later, Population this Second Temple was renovated by Herod the Great in about 20 BCE.
    [Show full text]
  • Day 7 Thursday March 10, 2022 Temple Mount Western Wall (Wailing Wall) Temple Institute Jewish Quarter Quarter Café Wohl Museu
    Day 7 Thursday March 10, 2022 Temple Mount Western Wall (Wailing Wall) Temple Institute Jewish Quarter Quarter Café Wohl Museum Tower of David Herod’s Palace Temple Mount The Temple Mount, in Hebrew: Har HaBáyit, "Mount of the House of God", known to Muslims as the Haram esh-Sharif, "the Noble Sanctuary and the Al Aqsa Compound, is a hill located in the Old City of Jerusalem that for thousands of years has been venerated as a holy site in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam alike. The present site is a flat plaza surrounded by retaining walls (including the Western Wall) which was built during the reign of Herod the Great for an expansion of the temple. The plaza is dominated by three monumental structures from the early Umayyad period: the al-Aqsa Mosque, the Dome of the Rock and the Dome of the Chain, as well as four minarets. Herodian walls and gates, with additions from the late Byzantine and early Islamic periods, cut through the flanks of the Mount. Currently it can be reached through eleven gates, ten reserved for Muslims and one for non-Muslims, with guard posts of Israeli police in the vicinity of each. According to Jewish tradition and scripture, the First Temple was built by King Solomon the son of King David in 957 BCE and destroyed by the Neo-Babylonian Empire in 586 BCE – however no substantial archaeological evidence has verified this. The Second Temple was constructed under the auspices of Zerubbabel in 516 BCE and destroyed by the Roman Empire in 70 CE.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Curricular Reform in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
    THE STATE OF CURRICULAR REFORM IN THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA JUNE 2012 INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RELIGION & DIPLOMACY INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RELIGION & DIPLOMACY WASHINGTON DC COVER PHOTO COURTESY OF AL JAZEERA ENGLISH THE STATE OF CURRICULUM REFORM IN THE KINGDOM OF SA UDI ARABIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is making measurable progress in reforming its textbook content, but still has much to do. Before assessing the current status of this effort and the way ahead, a look at the context in which these reforms are taking place is very much in order. Background Recent education reform in Saudi Arabia began in the shadow of tragedy. The public outcry inspired by the 2002 Meccan girls’ school firei led to the abolishment of the General Presidency for Girls’ Education dominated by the conservative religious establishment and a transfer of the responsibility for girls’ education to the Ministry of Education.ii Later that year, the royal advisory council – the Shura Council – recommended a new national strategy on technical and vocational education, finally addressing Saudi business’ complaints about the lack of qualified Saudi applicants for jobs.iii Reform priorities changed again after May 2003, when an al-Qaeda-led wave of terror attacks rocked the country. National Dialogue Forums convened by then-Crown Prince Abdullah featured expert testimony in December of 2003 that the Kingdom’s Islamic curriculum “encourages violence towards others.” This precipitated the first steps toward meaningful reform, intended to excise some of the more controversial passages from Saudi textbooks.iv Parallel to these efforts, Saudi de-radicalization programs were initiated in 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Al-Qaeda Al-Qaeda Master Narratives and Affiliate Case Studies: Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb
    UNCLASSIFIED // FOUO Open Source Center SPECIAL REPORT: Al-Qaeda Al-Qaeda Master Narratives and Affiliate Case Studies: Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb September 2011 This document does not represent US Government policy or views UNCLASSIFIED // FOUO 2 Master Narratives Special Report / Al-Qaeda UNCLASSIFIED // FOUO Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 3 Master Narratives ........................................................................................................................... 9 “War on Islam” ....................................................................................................................................10 “Agents of the West” .......................................................................................................................... 13 “The Nakba” ........................................................................................................................................16 “Violent Jihad” ....................................................................................................................................19 “Blood of the Martyrs” ...................................................................................................................... 22 “Restoring the Caliphate” .................................................................................................................. 25 Appendix & Sourcing ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Report from ADL International Affairs
    A report from ADL International Affairs NOV Teaching Hate 2018 and Violence: Problematic Passages from Saudi State Textbooks for the 2018–19 School Year ADL International Affiars instead of Center on Extremism? Our Mission: To stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment to all. ABOUT ADL INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS ADL’s International Affairs (IA) pursues ADL’s mission around the globe, fighting anti-Semitism and hate, supporting the security of Jewish communities worldwide and working for a safe, democratic and pluralistic State of Israel at peace with her neighbors. ADL places a special emphasis on Europe, Latin America and Israel, but advocates for many Jewish communities around the world facing anti-Semitism. With a full-time staff in Israel, IA promotes social cohesion in Israel as a means of strengthening the Jewish and democratic character of the State, while opposing efforts to delegitimize it. David Andrew Weinberg is ADL’s Washington Director for International Affairs. He serves The IA staff helps raise these international issues with the U.S. as the organization’s main point of contact on foreign affairs for and foreign governments and works with partners around the Congress, the Administration world to provide research and analysis, programs and resources to and foreign embassies. He also serves as ADL’s lead analyst on fight anti-Semitism, extremism, hate crimes and cyberhate. With a the Arabian Peninsula. seasoned staff of international affairs experts, ADL’s IA division is Prior to joining ADL, Dr. Weinberg one of the world’s foremost authorities in combatting all forms of worked for the Foundation for hate globally.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Radicalism After the Arab Uprisings JON B
    Religious Religious Radicalism after the Arab Uprisings JON B. ALTERMAN, EDITOR Radicalism The Arab uprisings of 2011 created unexpected opportunities for religious radicals. Although many inside and outside the region initially saw the uprisings as liberal triumphs, illiberal forces have benefitted after the Arab disproportionately. In Tunisia, formally marginalized jihadi-salafi groups appealed for mainstream support, and in Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood triumphed in Jon B. Alterman Uprisings elections. Even in Saudi Arabia, not known for either lively politics or for Jon B. Alterman political entrepreneurship, a surprising array of forces praised the rise of “Islamic democracy” under a Muslim Brotherhood banner. Yet, at the same time, the Arab uprisings reinforced regional governments’ advantages. The chaos engulfing parts of the region convinced some citizens that they were better off with the governments they had, and many governments successfully employed old and new tools of repression to reinforce the status quo. Religious Radicalism after the Arab Uprisings In the Middle East, conflicts that many thought were coming to an end Religious Radicalism after the Arab Uprisings will continue, as will the dynamism and innovation that have emerged among radical and opposition groups. To face the current threats, governments will need to use many of their existing tools skillfully, but they will also need to judge what tools will no longer work, and what new tools they have at their disposal. The stakes could not be higher. 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036 t. 202.887.0200 | f. 202.775.3199 www.csis.org EDITOR Jon B. Alterman Religious Radicalism after the Arab Uprisings Religious Radicalism after the Arab Uprisings Editor Jon B.
    [Show full text]
  • An Anthropological Perspective on the Mosque in Pakistan.', Asian Anthropology., 14 (2)
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 22 September 2015 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Mughal, M. A. Z. (2015) 'An anthropological perspective on the mosque in Pakistan.', Asian anthropology., 14 (2). pp. 166-181. Further information on publisher's website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1683478X.2015.1055543 Publisher's copyright statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor Francis Group in Asian Anthropology on 01/05/2015, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1683478X.2015.1055543. Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk An anthropological perspective on the mosque in Pakistan Muhammad Aurang Zeb Mughal Department of Anthropology, University of Durham, UK Abstract The mosque occupies a central position in the social as well as religious life of Muslims.
    [Show full text]
  • Hijazi House: Gendered Space and Cultural Relations
    Islamic Heritage Architecture and Art III 113 HIJAZI HOUSE: GENDERED SPACE AND CULTURAL RELATIONS ALAA ZAHER Q. AL-BAN Interior Design Department, Dar Al-Hekma University, Saudi Arabia ABSTRACT Because of Makkah and Madinah, the two holiest sites in Islam, Hijaz in western Saudi Arabia is the most important religious province. The traditional Hijazi residence in Jeddah has evolved significantly over time but provides a case study for how the social and cultural values, particularly the separation of men and women, are manifested in its spatial organization. Traditionally, public spaces are the male domain and the private spaces are those of the female and family. The purpose was to provide total privacy and seclusion for women and reflects the broader social practice requiring women to cover up in public or in front of non-family males. This social organization is reflected in the spatial layout of the remaining Hijazi residences in Jeddah. Pejorative phrases such as “the segregation of women” or “the seclusion of women” are common in the west when gender relations in Islam are discussed. In contrast, this paper will cast light on how the spatial organization of the traditional Hijazi residence serves women’s needs, comfort, and privacy and how it evolved to maintain cultural relations in the 19th century. Photographs and drawings will demonstrate the power of social values in the architecture of the Hijazi House. Keywords: Hijazi architecture, Islamic gender relations, roshan, female agency, Saudi architecture. 1 INTRODUCTION Saudi Arabia’s primary language is Arabic and the dominant religion is Islam. One of the five pillars and duties of Islamic faith is the Hajj Pilgrimage, which requires all able-bodied Muslims around the world to make the journey to Makkah, which houses the Kabaa.
    [Show full text]
  • Mamluk Jerusalem: Architecturally Challenging Narratives Andrew C
    LUX: A Journal of Transdisciplinary Writing and Research from Claremont Graduate University Volume 3 | Issue 1 Article 16 2013 Mamluk Jerusalem: Architecturally Challenging Narratives Andrew C. Smith Claremont Graduate University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/lux Part of the International and Area Studies Commons, International Relations Commons, Other Political Science Commons, and the Other Religion Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Andrew C. (2013) "Mamluk Jerusalem: Architecturally Challenging Narratives," LUX: A Journal of Transdisciplinary Writing and Research from Claremont Graduate University: Vol. 3: Iss. 1, Article 16. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/lux/vol3/iss1/16 Smith: Mamluk Jerusalem Smith 1 Mamluk Jerusalem: Architecturally Challenging Narratives Andrew C. Smith Claremont Graduate University Department of Religion Abstract Narratives abound concerning the religious and political positioning of Jerusalem in the past as well as the present and have been used in a variety of ways to serve various ideologies or political ends. One such narrative (which can be found even in some academic treatises of the history of Jerusalem) states that following the Muslim re-conquest of the city after the Crusades Muslim rulers neglected the city entirely, leading to its decline into obscurity and ruin. This narrative asserts that the city remained as such until Zionism, Jewish immigration, and, most especially, the establishment of the state of Israel rescued Jerusalem and resituated it in its preeminent position as the Holy City. This paper argues against such a narrative by examining the architectural contributions and growth of the city religiously during the rule of the Mamluk Empire (1250-1517).
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT of MISSION Religious Freedom in Israel and The
    REPORT OF MISSION Religious Freedom In Israel and the Palestinian Territories April 2008 This Report was prepared as pursuant to the ECLJ mission to Israel and the Palestinian Territories in January 2008, in conjunction with the official visit by the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief. European Centre for Law and Justice American Center for Law and Justice 4, quai Koch 201 Maryland Ave., N.E. 67000 Strasbourg, France Washington, DC 20002 Phone: +33 (0)3.88.24.94.40 Phone: (202) 546-8890 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Website: www.eclj.org Website: www.aclj.org Gregor Puppinck, Counsel Jay Alan Sekulow, Chief Counsel Terrence McKeegan, Counsel Stuart Roth, Senior Counsel Kris Wenberg, Associate Counsel The European Centre for Law and Justice (ECLJ), is a public interest law firm that specializes in protecting religious freedom and other human rights at the European institutions as well as internationally. The ECLJ is a non-governmental organization with Special Consultative Status with the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) is a public interest law firm specializing in American constitutional law. The ACLJ has participated in numerous cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, Federal Court of Appeals, Federal District Courts, and various state courts regarding freedom of religion and freedom of speech. 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................2 ISRAEL............................................................................................................................................5 I. Legal Status of Religious Communites in Israel .....................................................................5 II. Process of Recognition of Religious Leaders .........................................................................7 III. Right to Build, Buy, and Operate Places of Worship in Israel ...............................................8 IV.
    [Show full text]