Mathematical Sociologist Jane Sell Texas A&M ([email protected]) VOLUME 16, ISSUE 1 FALL/WINTER 2012 - 2 0 1 3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mathematical Sociologist Jane Sell Texas A&M (J-Sell@Tamu.Edu) VOLUME 16, ISSUE 1 FALL/WINTER 2012 - 2 0 1 3 Section Officers: Chair Noah Friedkin University of California, Santa Barbara ([email protected]) Chair-Elect Mathematical Sociologist Jane Sell Texas A&M ([email protected]) VOLUME 16, ISSUE 1 FALL/WINTER 2012 - 2 0 1 3 Past Chair Katherine Faust University of California, Irvine Comments from the Chair...Noah Friedkin [email protected] The Section Chair is given the op- t+1 opinion is taken as an average Secretary-Treasurer John Skvoretz portunity to make introductory of the individual’s own opinion University of South Florida ([email protected]) comments. I did this once before and those other individuals’ time t in our Spring 2003 Newsletter. I opinions, which are within the Council Members find that a particular concern ex- individual’s confidence bound. Alison Bianchi University of Iowa pressed then remains a concern. I ([email protected]) wrote, after noting the influx of There is a substantial empirical Matthew Brashears natural scientists into research on literature on the relationship of Cornell University opinion differences and interper- ([email protected]) social networks, “Never before has there been a more pressing sonal influences. Social psycholo- Peter Burke University of California, demand for sociologists who com- gists have been examining the imaginations. My experience Riverside relationship since the 1950s. Eu- ([email protected]) bine strong mathematical skills with models is captured by a with deep substantive grounding gene Johnsen and I took a close lithograph which shows a log- James D. Montgomery ger, ax in hand, looking at a University of Wisconsin-Madison in particular fields. Mathematical look at this literature (Friedkin & ([email protected]) Johnsen 2011). Obviously, the tree that he has just cut models of sociological phenome- through: the tree, instead of Matthew J Salganik development of models of opinion Princeton University na are unlikely to make an endur- toppling over, has floated ([email protected]) ing contribution if they are not dynamics is greatly simplified if upwards and the logger is Arnout van de Rijt informed by the refined substan- the information in a group’s time t standing dumbstruck at the SUNY Stony Brook University opinion vector suffices to specify result. An interaction of theo- (Arnout.VanDeRijt@ tive sensibility that usually comes ry and experiment is useful in stonybrook.edu ) from systematic reading in sociol- the group’s time t influence net- disciplining mathematical ogy and intense involvement with work. It is not surprising that Student Member modelers have been attracted to imagination. Ashton Verdery data.” University of North Carolina such a specification for over half a Chapel Hill INSIDE THIS ISSUE: ([email protected]) The field of opinion dynamics, century. The empirical evidence with which I’m associated, is rap- does not support the threshold Comments from the 1 Newsletter Editor idly growing. An increasingly assumption of bounded confi- Chair Pamela Emanuelson North Dakota State University prominent line of work in this dence models. The evidence sup- 2012 Section Awards 2 ([email protected]) field deals with opinion dynamics ports a weighted averaging as- Donna Lancianese under bounded confidence; e.g., sumption in which the weights Highlights 3-4 University of Iowa ([email protected]) Hegselmann & Krause (2002). The accorded to particular persons are Joint Japan-North Ameri- 5-7 bounded confidence assumption independent of opinion differ- Webmaster is that an interpersonal influence ences. The line of work on opin- Matthew Brashears Cornell University relation “v influences u” will exist ion dynamics under bounded con- Section Report 8-12 ([email protected]) if and only if the time t opinion fidence is based on a false prem- Conference 13 difference of u and v does not ise. Announcements exceed a fixed threshold value for u. Hence, the influence network There is no lack of imagination in Call For Nominations 14-15 the field in constructing models. may change as its members’ opin- However, there is a severe lack of Editor’s Comments 16 ions change. An individual’s time discipline on investigators’ VOLUME 16, ISSUE 1 P A G E 2 John Skvoretz University of South Florida Committee Members: Jane Sell (chair), Arnout van de Rijt, Bob Hanneman Andreas Wimmer and Kevin Lewis “Beyond and Below Racial Homophily: ERG Models of Friendship Networks Documented in Facebook” American Journal of Sociology Committee Members: Noah Friedkin (chair), Matthew Salganik, Damon Centola, Emma Spiro David Melamed and Scott Savage “Predicting Social Influence: A Model at the Intersection of Sociology and Psychology” Committee Members: Alison Bianchi (chair) Will Kalkhoff, Omar Lizardo P A G E 3 HIGHLIGHTS: Outstanding Article Award Winners Andreas Wimmer Most of my work over the past 20 years deals with pro- cesses of ethnic group formation and nation building. While much of the ethnicity literature has been pre- occupied with ontological/definitional issues (is it a matter of identity or interest, is it stable or contextually fluid, etc.), I try to develop a systematic comparative account that focuses on variation in the properties of ethnic categories (see my new book “Ethnic Boundary Making”, forthcoming at Oxford University Press). In order to do this properly, we need to disentangle ethnic group formation processes (the consequences of in- Andreas Wimmer and Kevin Lewis group preferences and the discrimination against oth- accept the outstanding article ers) from other social processes. This is also the gist of award, Denver, CO 2012 the paper co-authored with Kevin Lewis. We try to show that the racial homogeneity of social networks shouldn’t automatically and uncritically be associated with same-race preference (or racial homophily). Ra- ther, there are a host of processes that can lead to homogenous networks that are analytically and empirical- ly distinct from racial homophily. Once you bring these other network formation processes into the picture, you realize that racial homophily is not the main force of network formation—contrary to what much of the literature on homophily assumes. Kevin and I were part of a team of researchers at Harvard (where I was teaching as a visiting professor) that developed a new dataset on the Facebook pages of a cohort of college students. Kevin, at that time a gradu- ate student in the department, did the heavy lifting in creating the dataset. I teamed up with him to do a study on ethnic and racial homophily, and we had research assistants code the ethnic and racial background of all students in the dataset. Both Kevin and I were novices when it comes to network methods. Kevin delved deeply into the matter and found the Exponential Random Graph approach and statnet as the corre- sponding program. We then learned how to produce and interpret results. It was a fantastic discovery, since so many of the things we wanted to do could be done with this approach: disentangling homophily on vari- ous, segmentally nested levels of categorization from each other (ethnic groups nested into racial catego- ries), disentangling homophily from other network formation processes (sorting and self-selection into op- portunities to meet, triadic closure and reciprocity) that influence levels of homogeneity, and so on. We worked on this for five years and were extremely pleased and proud when we were noticed that we won the best paper award from the Mathematical Sociology Section. All along the way, we received a lot of support, advise, and technical help from many, many section members, including the producers of statnet. Since we were newcomers to the field and did not have any friends to rely upon or favors waiting to be returned, we were amazed by the generosity and openness with which mathematical sociologists reacted to our many re- quests and demands—thanks indeed! VOLUME 16, ISSUE 1 Kevin Lewis P A G E 4 My path to mathematical sociology has been a circuitous one. Inspired by math teachers in high school, I de- clared a double major in math and sociology my freshman year at UC San Diego and hoped to become a high school teacher myself. Unfortunately, it turns out math is a lot more fun when you understand it: I breezed through lower-division calculus courses, but the upper-division stuff was completely over my head. Mean- while, I became more and more interested in sociology and in teaching at the college level. So, at age 19, I switched to a sociology/philosophy double major; downgraded my math ambitions to a minor; and, tired of numbers, decided I would go to grad school to become a qualitative sociologist (my undergraduate thesis, for instance, was an interview-based study of cosmetic surgery in California). Now, 10 years later, Andreas and I are winning this award. What happened??! I met Andreas shortly after arriving at Harvard, where he was visiting and taught my cohort contemporary theory. Meanwhile, Jason Kaufman and Marco Gonzalez invited me to join a nascent project on taste subcultures among college stu- dents, drawing on data from Facebook (which was then only a couple years old). Andreas was independently interested in working with Facebook, but instead to look at ethno-racial homophily. Our teams joined forces to create the dataset—and, several years later, each strand of research finally bore fruit: the paper with An- dreas on racial homogeneity (AJS 2010) and a paper with Jason and Marco on selection and influence (PNAS 2012). My return to numbers, then, was motivated more by necessity than interest; if we were going to look at friendship formation we would need to use network tools. I continue to be grateful to Ann McCranie for in- troducing me to ERGMs during an ICPSR summer session, which appeared to be the sole method capable of adequately disentangling the issue Andreas and I were interested in (how is racial homogeneity generated?).
Recommended publications
  • Advanced Topics in Social Dynamics Family Demography Session 1(9.03
    Advanced topics in social dynamics Family Demography Gøsta Esping-Andersen Bocconi 2020-21 Session 1(9.03.2021): Theoretical perspectives in the study of the family In this session we will focus on key theories within family research, from both economics and sociology. Required readings: Becker, G (1973). ‘A theory of marriage. Part 1’. Journal of Political Economy, 81: 4: 813-46 Lesthaeghe, R. (2010).‘The unfolding story of the second demographic transition’. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 211-251. Recommended readings: Esping-Andersen, G and Billari, F. 2015 ‘Retheorizing family demographic change’. Population and Development Review, 41: 1-31 McDonald, P 2013 ‘Societal foundations for explaining fertility’. Demographic Research, 28: 981-994 Lundberg, Shelly and Pollack, Robert. 2007. "The American Family and Family Economics." Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(2): 3-26. Oppenheimer, Valerie Kincade. 1988. "A Theory of Marriage Timing." American Journal of Sociology 94(3): 563-91. Session 2 (10.03). Trends in gender roles, family behavior and structure Required readings: Esping-Andersen, G 2016 Families in the 21st Century. Chapter 1: ‘The return of the family’ (this book can be downloaded gratis from SNS’ website ([email protected]) Goldin, M 2006. "The Quiet Revolution That Transformed Women’s Employment, Education, and Family." American Economic Review 96(2): 1-21. Recommended readings: (for student presentation: minimally the Sevilla-Sanz article and the van Bavel et.al. paper) Van Bavel, J 2018 ‘The reversal of the gender gap in education and its consequences for family life’. Annual Review of Sociology, 44: 341-60 England, P. Et.al., 2020 ‘Progress toward gender equality in the United States has slowed or stalled’.
    [Show full text]
  • Manifesto of Computational Social Science R
    Manifesto of computational social science R. Conte, N. Gilbert, G. Bonelli, C. Cioffi-Revilla, G. Deffuant, J. Kertesz, V. Loreto, S. Moat, J.P. Nadal, A. Sanchez, et al. To cite this version: R. Conte, N. Gilbert, G. Bonelli, C. Cioffi-Revilla, G. Deffuant, et al.. Manifesto of computational social science. The European Physical Journal. Special Topics, EDP Sciences, 2012, 214, p. 325 - p. 346. 10.1140/epjst/e2012-01697-8. hal-01072485 HAL Id: hal-01072485 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01072485 Submitted on 8 Oct 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 214, 325–346 (2012) © The Author(s) 2012. This article is published THE EUROPEAN with open access at Springerlink.com PHYSICAL JOURNAL DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2012-01697-8 SPECIAL TOPICS Regular Article Manifesto of computational social science R. Conte1,a, N. Gilbert2, G. Bonelli1, C. Cioffi-Revilla3,G.Deffuant4,J.Kertesz5, V. Loreto6,S.Moat7, J.-P. Nadal8, A. Sanchez9,A.Nowak10, A. Flache11, M. San Miguel12, and D. Helbing13 1 ISTC-CNR, Italy 2 CRESS, University
    [Show full text]
  • Classroom Social Dynamics Management: Why the Invisible Hand of the Teacher Matters For
    Running head: MANAGING CLASSROOM SOCIAL DYNAMICS Classroom Social Dynamics Management: Why the Invisible Hand of the Teacher Matters for Special Education Thomas W. Farmer, PhD1 Molly Dawes, PhD1 Jill V. Hamm, PhD2 David Lee, PhD3 Meera Mehtaji, MEd4 Abigail S. Hoffman, PhD2 Debbie S. Brooks, PhD3 1College of William & Mary 2The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 3The Pennsylvania State University 4Virginia Commonwealth University Author Notes: This work was supported by research grants (R305A120812; R305A140434) from the Institute of Education Sciences. The views expressed in this article are ours and do not represent the granting agency. This article was blind peer-reviewed. Keywords: invisible hand, classroom management, social dynamics, intensive interventions Conflict of Interest: The author declares no conflict of interest. Remedial and Special Education Vol 39 No. 3, 2018 MANAGING CLASSROOM SOCIAL DYNAMICS 2 Abstract The invisible hand is a metaphor that refers to teachers’ impact on the classroom peer ecology. Although teachers have the capacity to organize the classroom environment and activities in ways that contribute to students’ social experiences, their contributions are often overlooked in research on students’ peer relations and the development of social interventions. To address this, researchers have begun to focus on clarifying strategies to manage classroom social dynamics. The goal of this paper is to consider potential contributions of this perspective for understanding the social experiences of students with disabilities and to explore associated implications for the delivery of classroom focused interventions to support their adaptation. Conceptual foundations of classroom social dynamics management and empirical research on the peer relationships of students with disabilities are outlined and the potential of the concept of the invisible hand is discussed in relation to other social support interventions for students with disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Network Analysis of Mental Models in Emergency Management Teams
    Social Network Analysis of Mental Models in Emergency Management Teams Bjørn Sætrevik1,2 & Euryph Line Solheim Kvamme 1,3 1: Operational Psychology Research Group, Department of Psychosocial Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Christies gate 12, NO-5015 Bergen. 2: Email: [email protected], corresponding author 3: Email: [email protected] Abstract Field studies of team interaction patterns may be the preferred way to examine the impact of social processes and mechanisms on team’s performance, but limitations in data quality may require adapted approaches. Social network analysis may be used to explore a team’s interaction, and to test whether social dynamics is associated with team performance. We pre-registered a novel approach for measuring social networks of teams in an extant field dataset of eleven emergency management teams performing a scenario training exercise. Our aim was to test whether teams with more evenly distributed interaction patterns have a more accurate and shared understanding of the task at hand. Our findings support the pre-registered hypotheses that more distributed and denser team networks are associated with more accurate and more shared mental models, while there was no support for associations between mental models and the individual’s position in the network. Keywords Social network analysis; mental models; shared mental models; situation awareness; emergency management teams; teamwork; social interaction 1: Introduction dyadic relationships between relevant individuals, groups or institutions (Borgatti & Foster, 2003; Henttonen, 2010). 1.1: Theoretical background The approach assumes that individuals are embedded in 1.1.1: The role of social networks in team performance multi-level relational structures (Balkundi & Harrison, Most work is performed by some form of team (Cross, 2006; Monge & Contractor, 2003; Newman, 2010; Streeter Rebele, & Grant, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Social Demography
    2nd term 2019-2020 Social demography Given by Juho Härkönen Register online Contact: [email protected] This course deals with some current debates and research topics in social demography. Social demography deals with questions of population composition and change and how they interact with sociological variables at the individual and contextual levels. Social demography also uses demographic approaches and methods to make sense of social, economic, and political phenomena. The course is structured into two parts. Part I provides an introduction to some current debates, with the purpose of laying a common background to Part II, in which these topics are deepened by individual presentations of more specific questions. In Part I, read all the texts assigned to the core readings, plus one from the additional readings. Brief response papers (about 1 page) should identify the core question/debate addressed in the readings and the summarize evidence for/against core arguments. The response papers are due at 17:00 the day before class (on Brightspace). Similarly, the classroom discussions should focus on these topics. The purpose of the additional reading is to offer further insights into the core debate, often through an empirical study. You should bring this insight to the classroom. Part II consists of individual papers (7-10 pages) and their presentations. You will be asked to design a study related to a current debate in social demography. This can expand and deepen upon the topics discussed in Part I, or you can alternatively choose another debate that was not addressed. Your paper and presentation can—but does not have to—be something that you will yourself study in the future (but it cannot be something that you are already doing).
    [Show full text]
  • Module 7 Key Thinkers Lecture 36 Auguste Comte and Herbert Spencer
    NPTEL – Humanities and Social Sciences – Introduction to Sociology Module 7 Key Thinkers Lecture 36 Auguste Comte and Herbert Spencer The thoughts of Auguste Comte (1798-1857), who coined the term sociology, while dated and riddled with weaknesses, continue in many ways to be important to contemporary sociology. First and foremost, Comte's positivism — the search for invariant laws governing the social and natural worlds — has influenced profoundly the ways in which sociologists have conducted sociological inquiry. Comte argued that sociologists (and other scholars), through theory, speculation, and empirical research, could create a realist science that would accurately "copy" or represent the way things actually are in the world. Furthermore, Comte argued that sociology could become a "social physics" — i.e., a social science on a par with the most positivistic of sciences, physics. Comte believed that sociology would eventually occupy the very pinnacle of a hierarchy of sciences. Comte also identified four methods of sociology. To this day, in their inquiries sociologists continue to use the methods of observation, experimentation, comparison, and historical research. While Comte did write about methods of research, he most often engaged in speculation or theorizing in order to attempt to discover invariant laws of the social world. Comte's famed "law of the three stages" is an example of his search for invariant laws governing the social world. Comte argued that the human mind, individual human beings, all knowledge, and world history develop through three successive stages. The theological stage is dominated by a search for the essential nature of things, and people come to believe that all phenomena are created and influenced by gods and supernatural forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Auguste Comte
    Module-2 AUGUSTE COMTE (1798-1857) Developed by: Dr. Subrata Chatterjee Associate Professor of Sociology Khejuri College P.O- Baratala, Purba Medinipur West Bengal, India AUGUSTE COMTE (1798-1857) Isidore-Auguste-Marie-François-Xavier Comte is regarded as the founders of Sociology. Comte’s father parents were strongly royalist and deeply sincere Roman Catholics. But their sympathies were at odds with the republicanism and skepticism that swept through France in the aftermath of the French Revolution. Comte resolved these conflicts at an early age by rejecting Roman Catholicism and royalism alike. Later on he was influenced by several important French political philosophers of the 18th century—such as Montesquieu, the Marquis de Condorcet, A.-R.-J. Turgot, and Joseph de Maistre. Comte’s most important acquaintance in Paris was Henri de Saint-Simon, a French social reformer and one of the founders of socialism, who was the first to clearly see the importance of economic organization in modern society. The major works of Auguste Comte are as follows: 1. The Course on Positive Philosophy (1830-1842) 2. Discourse on the Positive Sprit (1844) 3. A General View of Positivism (1848) 4. Religion of Humanity (1856) Theory of Positivism As a philosophical ideology and movement positivism first assumed its distinctive features in the work of the French philosopher Auguste Comte, who named the systematized science of sociology. It then developed through several stages known by various names, such as Empiriocriticism, Logical Positivism and Logical Empiricism and finally in the mid-20th century flowed into the movement known as Analytic and Linguistic philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is Doing Computational Social Science? Trends in Big Data Research
    A SAGE White Paper Who Is Doing Computational Social Science? Trends in Big Data Research Katie Metzler Publisher for SAGE Research Methods, SAGE Publishing David A. Kim Stanford University, Department of Emergency Medicine Nick Allum Professor of Sociology and Research Methodology, University of Essex Angella Denman University of Essex www.sagepublishing.com Contents Overview ........................................................................................................................1 What Have We Learned About Those Doing Big Data Research? .....................................1 What Have We Learned About Those Who Want to Engage in Big Data Research in the Future? ...................................................................................1 What Have We Learned About Those Teaching Research Methods? .................................2 Methodology .................................................................................................................2 Analysis .........................................................................................................................2 Challenges Facing Big Data Researchers in the Social Sciences ....................................11 Challenges Facing Educators ............................................................................................16 Barriers to Entry ................................................................................................................16 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Social Network Analysis with Content and Graphs
    SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS WITH CONTENT AND GRAPHS Social Network Analysis with Content and Graphs William M. Campbell, Charlie K. Dagli, and Clifford J. Weinstein Social network analysis has undergone a As a consequence of changing economic renaissance with the ubiquity and quantity of » and social realities, the increased availability of large-scale, real-world sociographic data content from social media, web pages, and has ushered in a new era of research and sensors. This content is a rich data source for development in social network analysis. The quantity of constructing and analyzing social networks, but content-based data created every day by traditional and social media, sensors, and mobile devices provides great its enormity and unstructured nature also present opportunities and unique challenges for the automatic multiple challenges. Work at Lincoln Laboratory analysis, prediction, and summarization in the era of what is addressing the problems in constructing has been dubbed “Big Data.” Lincoln Laboratory has been networks from unstructured data, analyzing the investigating approaches for computational social network analysis that focus on three areas: constructing social net- community structure of a network, and inferring works, analyzing the structure and dynamics of a com- information from networks. Graph analytics munity, and developing inferences from social networks. have proven to be valuable tools in solving these Network construction from general, real-world data presents several unexpected challenges owing to the data challenges. Through the use of these tools, domains themselves, e.g., information extraction and pre- Laboratory researchers have achieved promising processing, and to the data structures used for knowledge results on real-world data.
    [Show full text]
  • Outlines of Sociology (1898; Reprint 1913)
    Lester F. Ward: Outlines of Sociology (1898; reprint 1913) [i] OUTLINES OF SOCIOLOGY - by Lester F. Ward - (1897; reprint 1913) Page 1 of 313 Lester F. Ward: Outlines of Sociology (1898; reprint 1913) [ii] Page 2 of 313 Lester F. Ward: Outlines of Sociology (1898; reprint 1913) [iii] OUTLINES OF SOCIOLOGY BY LESTER F. WARD AUTHOR OF "DYNAMIC SOCIOLOGY," "THE PSYCHIC FACTORS OF CIVILIZATION," ETC. New York THE MACMILLAN COMPANY LONDON: MACMILLAN & CO., LTD. 1913 All rights reserved Page 3 of 313 Lester F. Ward: Outlines of Sociology (1898; reprint 1913) [iv] COPYRIGHT, 1897, BY THE MACMILLAN COMPANY. --------- Set up and electrotyped January, 1898. Reprinted June, 1899; February, 1904; August, 1909; March, 1913. Norwood Press J. S. Cushing & Co. – Berwick & Smith Norwood Mass. U.S.A. Page 4 of 313 Lester F. Ward: Outlines of Sociology (1898; reprint 1913) [v] To Dr. Albion W. Small THE FIRST TO DRAW ATTENTION TO THE EDUCATIONAL VALUE OF MY SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY THE STANCH DEFENDER OF MY METHOD IN SOCIOLOGY AND TO WHOM THE PRIOR APPEARANCE OF THESE CHAPTERS IS DUE THIS WORK IS GRATEFULLY DEDICATED Page 5 of 313 Lester F. Ward: Outlines of Sociology (1898; reprint 1913) [vi] Page 6 of 313 Lester F. Ward: Outlines of Sociology (1898; reprint 1913) [vii] PREFACE This little work has been mainly the outcome of a course of lectures which I delivered at the School of Sociology of the Hartford Society for Education Extension in 1894 and 1895. They were given merely from notes in six lectures the first of these years, and expanded into twelve lectures the following year in substantially their present form.
    [Show full text]
  • Bigger Computational Social Science: Data, Theories, Models, and Simulations—Not Just Big Data
    Bigger Computational Social Science: Data, Theories, Models, and Simulations—Not Just Big Data Claudio Cioffi-Revilla, Ph.D. Center for Social Complexity and Department of Computational and Data Sciences George Mason University Research Hall, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, Virginia 22030, USA Email: ccioffi at gmu dot edu June 24, 2016 Abstract—Computational social science (CSS) is an interdisci- Simon and his contemporaries, and to make advanced use of plinary field of social science that integrates individual social sci- computation in all its functions. Recently, a highly restrictive ence disciplines. Its purpose is to advance scientific understanding version of CSS has been proposed, based on the new “big of social phenomena through the medium of computing, which is used both as a paradigm and a methodological tool. Recently, data” from social media and other sources, using available restrictive versions of CSS have been proposed, based on “big progress in algorithms from computer science, largely ignoring data” now available from social media and other sources and rigorous theory, models, or computational simulations—all progress in algorithms from computer science, while eschewing three of which were championed by Simon. This paper argues theory, models, or computational simulations—all three major for a comprehensive and balanced CSS, one paradigmatically parts of CSS. This paper argues for a comprehensive and balanced CSS that is paradigmatically guided by theory, enriched guided by theory, enriched by analytical models, and enabled by analytical models, and enabled by computer simulations, all by computer simulations, all three drawing on data, be it big three drawing on data, be it big or small.1 or small (Kitchin and Lauriault 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Social Science (CMN150V)
    Computational Social Science (CMN150V) Digital technology has not only revolutionized society but also the way we can study it. An increasing part of human interaction leaves a massive digital footprint behind. Studying it allows us to gain unprecedented insights into what society is and how it works, including its intricate social networks that had long been obscure. Computational power allows us to detect hidden patterns through analytical tools like machine learning and to natural language processing. Finally, computer simulations enable us to explore hypothetical situations that may not even exist in reality, but that we would like to exist: a better world. Computational social science provides us with the tools to explore new scenarios in a way that is as intriguing as playing a video game, while at the same time grounding it into the empirical reality of the world around us. This course gives an introduction to some of the exciting possibilities of how to do research. While no formal requisites are necessary to join this course, at the end you will web-scrape ‘big’ data from the internet, execute a social network analysis (SNA), find hidden patterns with machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP), and create an agent-based computer simulation to explore what might happen if we would change certain things in society. 1 Given the myriad of possibilities offered by computational social science and by online course delivery, this course draws on the expertise from faculty members of all 10 UC campuses, including from faculty from UC Berkeley, UC Davis, UC Irvine, UC Los Angeles, UC Merced, UC Riverside, UC San Diego, UC San Francisco, UC Santa Barbara, and UC Santa Cruz.
    [Show full text]