DOCSLIB.ORG

Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Development of the pelvic floor : implications for clinical anatomy Wallner, C. Publication date 2008 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Wallner, C. (2008). Development of the pelvic floor : implications for clinical anatomy. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:27 Sep 2021 APPENDIX LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 183 184 BUTTOCK PAIN AFTER SACROSPINOUS HYSTEROPEXY Published as: Wallner C (2008). Buttock pain after sacrospinous hysteropexy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-008-0646-3. 185 Dear Editor, With great interest I read the recent publication of Dietz et al [1] in your journal. The authors describe that buttock pain occurred post-operatively in ~18% of patients undergoing sacrospinous hysteropexy for pelvic organ prolapse. The authors state in their discussion that the pain can be explained by injury to nerves of the sacral plexus, such as the branches of the pudendal nerve. Here, I would like to propose that this pain can be explained by injury of the ‘levator ani nerve’, the nerve that lies on the superior surface of the sacrospinous ligament and in the area of the operative field. This explanation has been neglected in clinical studies so far. Recent research by our [2, 3] and others groups [4-8] has emphasized that the levator ani muscle is innervated not only by the pudendal nerve from its inferior surface, but also by the levator ani nerve from its superior surface. The levator ani nerve originates directly from the sacral plexus and courses on the superior surface of the coccygeus muscle/sacrospinous ligament complex towards the superior surface of the levator ani muscle (Fig. 1). On its trajectory, it crosses the sacrospinous ligament 0-4 cm medial to the ischial spine [2, 6-8]. As sutures are placed through the sacrospinous ligament approximately 2 cm medial to the ischial spine during sacrospinous hysteropexy or sacrospinous ligament fixation in general, the procedure can injure the levator ani nerve [2, 5-8] and thereby entail the sensation of buttock pain. Additional injury to the pudendal nerve may also occur, because the pudendal nerve, which lies inferior to the sacrospinous ligament, is only 4-11 mm apart from levator ani nerve [2]. Christian Wallner Department of Anatomy & Embryology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 186 Figure 1. The levator ani nerve (LAN). Left side of a midsagittally transsected pelvis of an adult female cadaver. Arrowheads illustrate the course of the levator ani nerve. Note the LAN’s course in the vicinity of the ischial spine (white pinhead). 187 References 1. Dietz V, Huisman M, de Jong J, Heintz P, van der Vaart C (2008). Functional outcome after sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterine descensus. Int Urogynecol J DOI 10.1007/s00192-007-0520-8 2. Wallner C, Maas CP, Dabhoiwala NF, Lamers WH, DeRuiter MC (2006). The Innervation of the Pelvic Floor Muscles: A Reappraisal for the Levator Ani Nerve. Obstet Gynecol 108:529-534 3. Wallner C, van Wissen J, Maas CP, Dabhoiwala NF, DeRuiter MC, Lamers WH (2008). The contribution of the Levator Ani Nerve and the Pudendal Nerve to the innervation of the Levator Ani Muscles; a study in human fetuses. Eur Urol DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.11.015 4. Grigorescu B, Lazarou G, Olson T, Downie S, Powers K, Greston W, Mikhail M (2007). Innervation of the levator ani muscles: description of the nerve branches to the pubococcygeus, iliococcygeus, and puborectalis muscles. Int Urogynecol J 19:107-116 5. Roshanravan SM, Wieslander CK, Schaffer JI, Corton MM (2007). Neurovascular anatomy of the sacrospinous ligament region in female cadavers: Implications in sacrospinous ligament fixation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:660.e1-660.e6 6. Takeyama M, Koyama M, Murakami G, Nagata I, Tomoe H, Furuya K (2008). Nerve preservation in tension-free vaginal mesh procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: a cadaveric study using fresh and fixed cadavers. Int Urogynecol J 19:559- 66 7. Barber MD, Bremer RE, Thor KB, Dolber PC, Kuehl TJ, Coates KW (2002). Innervation of the female levator ani muscles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:64-71 8. Lazarou G, Grigorescu BA, Olson TR, Downie SA, Powers K, Mikhail MS (2007). Anatomic variations of the pelvic floor nerves adjacent to the sacrospinous ligament: a female cadaver study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007; DOI: 10.1007/s00192-007-0494-6. 188 IS THE PUBORECTALIS MUSCLE PART OF THE LEVATOR ANI MUSCLE? Published as: Wallner C (2008). Is the Puborectalis Muscle Part of the Levator Ani Muscle? Dis Colon Rectum, 51(7):1165-6. 189 To the Editor – With great interest I have read the article by Guo and Li1 on the anatomy of the levator ani and especially puborectalis muscle by use of MRI and CT. The authors state that the levator ani has a transverse portion and a vertical portion and that the puborectalis muscle is a u-shaped muscle outside the vertical portion. From those findings the authors conclude that the puborectalis is not a part of the levator ani muscle. The concept that the puborectalis muscle is anatomically a part of the external anal sphincter muscle, rather then of the levator ani muscle has previously been proposed from a cadaver study.2 Although the puborectalis and external anal sphincter muscle form a functional unit in maintaining continence, developmental studies give evidence that the puborectalis is anatomically a part of the levator ani muscle. Studies on the levator ani muscle from (immuno)histochemically stained serial sections of human fetuses clearly show that the pubococcygeus and puborectalis muscle have intervening and inseparable muscle fibers at their pubic origin3,4 while the puborectalis muscle and external anal sphincter muscle have no muscle fiber connection and are separated by connective tissue3,5 (Fig. 1). Additionally the puborectalis and external anal sphincter muscle appear at different time points during development.3 Furthermore, developmental and conventional dissection studies show that the levator ani muscle (including the puborectalis) is innervated by the levator ani nerves on the superior side while the pudendal nerve innervates the external anal sphincter and has only a minor contribution to the levator ani muscle innervation.5- 7 Therefore it can be concluded that the puborectalis is anatomically a part of the levator ani muscle and not of the external anal sphincter. Studies such as those by Guo and Li1,8 give important and clinically relevant results on the function of the pelvic floor muscles in continence. Caution should however be taken to draw anatomical conclusions from such studies without considering robust developmental and anatomical studies. Christian Wallner Department of Anatomy & Embryology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 190 Figure 1. Transverse section through the external anal sphincter muscle (EAS) and the puborectalis portion (PR) of the levator ani muscle (female fetus, 14 weeks of gestation). The section was stained immunohistochemically for striated muscle, as described elsewhere.6 Note the clear separation of the two muscles (arrowheads). Bar = 1 mm. EAS, external anal sphincter muscle; PR, puborectalis muscle; R, rectum; V, vaginal vestibule. 191 References 1. Guo M, Li D. Pelvic floor images: anatomy of the levator ani muscle. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2007; DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-0262-1. 2. Shafik A. New concept of the anatomy of the anal sphincter mechanism and the physiology of defecation. II. Anatomy of the levator ani muscle with special reference to puborectalis. Invest Urol 1975; 13:175-182. 3. Levi AC, Borghi F, Garavoglia M. Development of the Anal-Canal Muscles. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 1991; 34:262-266. 4. Fritsch H, Frohlich B. Development of the Levator Ani Muscle in Human Fetuses. Early Human Development 1994; 37:15-25. 5. Wallner C, van Wissen J, Maas CP, Dabhoiwala NF, DeRuiter MC, Lamers WH. The contribution of the Levator Ani Nerve and the Pudendal Nerve to the innervation of the Levator Ani Muscles; a study in human fetuses. European Urology 2007; accepted. 6. Wallner C, Maas CP, Dabhoiwala NF, Lamers WH, DeRuiter MC. The Innervation of the Pelvic Floor Muscles: A Reappraisal for the Levator Ani Nerve. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2006; 108:529-534. 7. Wallner C, Maas CP, Dabhoiwala NF, Lamers WH, DeRuiter MC. Evidence for the innervation of the puborectalis muscle by the levator ani nerve. Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2006; 18:1121-1122. 8. Li D, Guo M. Morphology of the Levator Ani Muscle. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2007; DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-0265-y. 192 EVIDENCE FOR THE INNERVATION OF THE PUBORECTALIS MUSCLE BY THE LEVATOR ANI NERVE Published as: Wallner C, Maas CP, Dabhoiwala NF, Lamers WH, DeRuiter MC (2006). Evidence for the innervation of the puborectalis muscle by the levator ani nerve.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vulvodynia: a Common and Underrecognized Pain Disorder in Women and Female Adolescents Integrating Current
    21/4/2017 www.medscape.org/viewarticle/877370_print www.medscape.org This article is a CME / CE certified activity. To earn credit for this activity visit: http://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/877370 Vulvodynia: A Common and Under­Recognized Pain Disorder in Women and Female Adolescents ­­ Integrating Current Knowledge Into Clinical Practice CME / CE Jacob Bornstein, MD; Andrew Goldstein, MD; Ruby Nguyen, PhD; Colleen Stockdale, MD; Pamela Morrison Wiles, DPT Posted: 4/18/2017 This activity was developed through a comprehensive review of the literature and best practices by vulvodynia experts to provide continuing education for healthcare providers. Introduction Slide 1. http://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/877370_print 1/69 21/4/2017 www.medscape.org/viewarticle/877370_print Slide 2. Historical Perspective Slide 3. http://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/877370_print 2/69 21/4/2017 www.medscape.org/viewarticle/877370_print Slide 4. What we now refer to as "vulvodynia" was first documented in medical texts in 1880, although some believe that the condition may have been described as far back as the 1st century (McElhiney 2006). Vulvodynia was described as "supersensitiveness of the vulva" and "a fruitful source of dyspareunia" before mention of the condition disappeared from medical texts for 5 decades. Slide 5. http://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/877370_print 3/69 21/4/2017 www.medscape.org/viewarticle/877370_print Slide 6. Slide 7. http://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/877370_print 4/69 21/4/2017 www.medscape.org/viewarticle/877370_print Slide 8. Slide 9. Magnitude of the Problem http://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/877370_print 5/69 21/4/2017 www.medscape.org/viewarticle/877370_print Slide 10.
    [Show full text]
  • A Step Towards Stereotactic Navigation During Pelvic Surgery: 3D Nerve Topography
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Erasmus University Digital Repository Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6086-3 A step towards stereotactic navigation during pelvic surgery: 3D nerve topography A. R. Wijsmuller1,2 · C. Giraudeau3 · J. Leroy4 · G. J. Kleinrensink5 · E. Rociu6 · L. G. Romagnolo7 · A. G. F. Melani7,8,9 · V. Agnus2 · M. Diana3 · L. Soler3 · B. Dallemagne2 · J. Marescaux2 · D. Mutter2 Received: 10 May 2017 / Accepted: 1 February 2018 © The Author(s) 2018. This article is an open access publication Abstract Background Long-term morbidity after multimodal treatment for rectal cancer is suggested to be mainly made up by nerve- injury-related dysfunctions. Stereotactic navigation for rectal surgery was shown to be feasible and will be facilitated by highlighting structures at risk of iatrogenic damage. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability to make a 3D map of the pelvic nerves with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods A systematic review was performed to identify a main positional reference for each pelvic nerve and plexus. The nerves were manually delineated in 20 volunteers who were scanned with a 3-T MRI. The nerve identifiability rate and the likelihood of nerve identification correctness were determined. Results The analysis included 61 studies on pelvic nerve anatomy. A main positional reference was defined for each nerve. On MRI, the sacral nerves, the lumbosacral plexus, and the obturator nerve could be identified bilaterally in all volunteers. The sympathetic trunk could be identified in 19 of 20 volunteers bilaterally (95%).
    [Show full text]
  • Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy for Vulvodynia a Clinician’S Guide
    Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy for Vulvodynia A Clinician’s Guide Stephanie A. Prendergast, MPT KEYWORDS Vulvodynia Vestibulodynia Dyspareunia Pelvic floor dysfunction Pelvic floor physical therapy KEY POINTS Most women with complaints of vulvar pain have pelvic floor dysfunction. Pelvic floor screenings can be easily incorporated into a gynecology examination to iden- tify pelvic floor dysfunction. Successful treatment plans for vulvodynia are multimodal and include pelvic floor physical therapy. INTRODUCTION OF NEW NOMENCLATURE In 2003, the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD) defined vulvodynia as ‘vulvar discomfort, most often described as burning pain, occurring in the absence of relevant visible findings or a specific, clinically identifiable, neurologic disorder’. This terminology served to acknowledge vulvar pain as a real disorder but fell short of classifying the syndrome as anything more than idiopathic pain. At that time, little was known about the pathophysiologic mechanisms that cause vulvodynia and treatment options were limited. Over the past decade, researchers have identified several causes of vulvodynia as well as associated factors/impair- ments. This identification resulted in the need to develop a new classification system to guide physicians toward better diagnosis and treatment. Last year the ISSVD, the International Society for the Study of Women’s Sexual Health, and the International Pelvic Pain Society came together to review the evidence and publish the 2015 Consensus Terminology
    [Show full text]
  • Laparoscopic Approach to Intrapelvic Nerve Entrapments
    4-Lemos - Laparoscopic.qxp_treatment 05/03/18 12:11 Pagina 6 Original article Laparoscopic approach to intrapelvic nerve entrapments NUCELIO LEMOS 1, KINSHUK KUMAR 2, CHRISTINE PLÖGER-SCHOR 3, PHILIP PENG 4, ALLAN GORDON 5 1 Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine Functional Pelvic Surgery & Neuropelveology - Head of the Pelvic Neurodysfunction Clinic of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Federal University of São Paulo 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON 3 Head of Physiotherapy in Pelvic Neurodysfunction Clinic of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Federal University of São Paulo 4 Professor, Department of Anesthesiology Toronto Western and Mount Sinai Hospital University of Toronto 5 Neurologist and Director Wasser Pain Management Centre Sinai Health System, Toronto - Asscociate Professor, Dept of Medicine, University of Toronto Abstract: It has been well-established that a large portion of the lumbosacral plexus is located intra-abdominally, in the retroperitoneal space. However, most of the literature descriptions of lesions on this plexus refer to its extra-abdominal parts whereas its intra-abdominal portions are often neglected.The objective of this review paper is to describe the laparoscopic anatomy of intrapelvic nerve bundles, as well as the findings and advances already achieved by Neuropelveology practitioners. Abreviations: - LANN – Laparoscopic Neuronavigation - LION – Laparoscopic Implantation of Neuroprosthesis Keywords: Sciatic; Nerve Entrapment; Gluteal Pain; Neuromodulation; Laparoscopy. INTRODUCTION Figure 1. – Laparoscopic view the It is well established that a large portion of the lum - left abdominal wall bosacral plexus is located intra-abdominally in the exhibiting the Ilio- retroperitoneal space 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Innervation of the Pelvic Floor Muscles: a Reappraisal for the Levator Ani Nerve
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Development of the pelvic floor : implications for clinical anatomy Wallner, C. Publication date 2008 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Wallner, C. (2008). Development of the pelvic floor : implications for clinical anatomy. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:01 Oct 2021 CHAPTER 3 THE INNERVATION OF THE PELVIC FLOOR MUSCLES: A REAPPRAISAL FOR THE LEVATOR ANI NERVE Published as: Wallner C, Maas CP, Dabhoiwala NF, Lamers WH, DeRuiter MC (2006). The Innervation of the Pelvic Floor Muscles: A Reappraisal for the Levator Ani Nerve. Obstet Gynecol, 108(3): 529-534. 75 CHAPTER 3 - INNERVATION OF THE PELVIC FLOOR MUSCLES: THE LEVATOR ANI NERVE Abstract Objective: A recent study, published in this journal suggested that a transvaginal pudendal nerve blockade selectively affects the pudendal nerve without blocking the direct sacral branches to the levator ani muscle (the levator ani nerve, LAN).
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy
    Anatomy of the Pelvis Presented by Julie Peterson, PT, DPT, WCS, BCB- PMD Acknowledgements: Ruth M. Maher, PT, PhD, DPT, WCS, BCB-PMD October 2019 • Material presented in this webinar cannot be reproduced without consent of original authors. 2 Objectives • Understand pelvic anatomy – male/female – Osteology – Ligamentous – Viscera – Blood supply/lymphatics – Musculature/fascia – Innervation – lumbo sacral plexus, branches and structures innervated 3 The Politics of the Pelvis 4 Who’s looking after this system? Osteology 6 Pelvic (Hip) Girdle • Each coxal (hip) bone consists of three bones that fuse together: ilium, pubis, and ischium. • The two coxal bones are joined anteriorly by the pubic symphysis (fibrocartilage). • Joined posteriorly by the sacrum forming the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). • The os coxa (hip bone) initially begins life as three individual bones: – Ilium – Ischium – Pubis The Ilium • Largest of the three hip bones • Ilium is the superior part of the hip bone • Consists of a superior ala and inferior body which forms the acetabulum (the socket for the head of the femur) • Superior border - iliac crest • Greater sciatic notch - allows passage of sciatic nerve Ischium and Pubis • Ischium - inferior and posterior part of the hip bone • Most prominent feature is the ischial tuberosity, it is the part that meets the chair when you are sitting • Pubis - inferior and anterior part of the hip bone • Superior and inferior rami and body Anterior Pelvis Posterior Pelvis Superior View False and True Pelves • Pelvic brim/inlet - a line
    [Show full text]
  • A Neglected Cause of Pain and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Workshop Chair: Nucelio Lemos, Canada 13 September 2017 09:00 - 10:30
    W24: Pudendal Neuralgia and Other Intrapelvic Peripheralnerve Entrapment- A Neglected Cause of Pain and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Workshop Chair: Nucelio Lemos, Canada 13 September 2017 09:00 - 10:30 Start End Topic Speakers 09:00 09:15 Pelvic Neuroanatomy and Neurophysiology Nucelio Lemos 09:15 09:45 Peripheral Nerve Entrapment – From Diagnosis to Surgical Nucelio Lemos Treatment 09:45 10:00 Role, Techniques and Rationale of Physical Therapy on the Marilia Frare Post-Operative Treatment of Intrapelvic Nerve Entrapments 10:00 10:15 Musculoskeletal Nerve Entrapments and Myofascial Pain- The Nelly Faghani Role of Physical 10:15 10:30 Discussion and Wrap Up Nucelio Lemos, Marilia Frare, Nelly Faghani Speaker Powerpoint Slides Please note that where authorised by the speaker all PowerPoint slides presented at the workshop will be made available after the meeting via the ICS website www.ics.org/2017/programme Please do not film or photograph the slides during the workshop as this is distracting for the speakers. Aims of Workshop This workshop is directed to both clinicians and basic scientists interested in understanding the pathophysiology, clinical features and the therapeutic options of pudendal neuralgia and other intrapelvic nerve entrapments. The program starts with a review of the normal pelvic neuroanatomy through real surgery laparoscopic dissections. After this introduction, the clinical features of nerve entrapment syndromes will be explained, medical treatment guidelines will be proposed and the surgical treatment will be demonstrated by means of real surgery videos. The role of pelvic floor muscles in the etiopathogenesis of pelvic and perineal pain role of physical therapy will also be thoroughly discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Innervation of the Levator Ani and Coccygeus Muscles of the Female Rat
    THE ANATOMICAL RECORD PART A 275A:1031–1041 (2003) Innervation of the Levator Ani and Coccygeus Muscles of the Female Rat RONALD E. BREMER,1 MATTHEW D. BARBER,2 KIMBERLY W. COATES,3 1,4 1,4,5 PAUL C. DOLBER, AND KARL B. THOR * 1Research Services, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Scott and White Clinic, Temple, Texas 4Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 5Dynogen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Durham, North Carolina ABSTRACT In humans, the pelvic floor skeletal muscles support the viscera. Damage to innervation of these muscles during parturition may contribute to pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Unfortunately, animal models that are suitable for studying parturition-in- duced pelvic floor neuropathy and its treatment are rare. The present study describes the intrapelvic skeletal muscles (i.e., the iliocaudalis, pubocaudalis, and coccygeus) and their innervation in the rat to assess its usefulness as a model for studies of pelvic floor nerve damage and repair. Dissection of rat intrapelvic skeletal muscles demonstrated a general similarity with human pelvic floor muscles. Innervation of the iliocaudalis and pubocaudalis muscles (which together constitute the levator ani muscles) was provided by a nerve (the “levator ani nerve”) that entered the pelvic cavity alongside the pelvic nerve, and then branched and penetrated the ventromedial (i.e., intrapelvic) surface of these muscles. Inner- vation of the rat coccygeus muscle (the “coccygeal nerve”) was derived from two adjacent branches of the L6-S1 trunk that penetrated the muscle on its rostral edge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clinical Effects of Neuromodulation Therapies in the Treatment of Faecal Incontinence
    MD(Res) Thesis 2016 THE CLINICAL EFFECTS OF NEUROMODULATION THERAPIES IN THE TREATMENT OF FAECAL INCONTINENCE __________________________________________________________________________________ 1 MD(Res) Thesis 2016 by Noel N. K. S. Thin Queen Mary’s National Centre for Bowel Research and Surgical Innovation A Thesis submitted for the Degree of Medical Doctorate (Research) The University of London November 2016 __________________________________________________________________________________ 2 MD(Res) Thesis 2016 ABSTRACT Background and Aims Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is an established therapy for faecal incontinence (FI). Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a newer, less-invasive treatment. The effectiveness, cost and acceptability of these treatments have not been systematically compared. Methods A systematic review of neuromodulation interventions for FI and an investigator-blinded, randomised pilot trial of PTNS vs. SNS including parallel quantitative (clinical outcomes and cost) and qualitative studies. Results The systematic review determined on intention-to-treat, the median success rates for SNS were 63% (range 33-66%), 58% (range 52-81%) and 54% (range 50-58%) in the short, medium and long terms respectively. The success rate for PTNS was 59% at 12 months. In the pilot trial: 40 patients (39 female; mean age 59 years) met eligibility criteria. As designed, 23 were randomised to receive SNS and 17 PTNS. 15 patients progressed to permanent SNS implantation and 16 patients received a full course of PTNS. Within group effect sizes were marginally greater for SNS than PTNS on available case analysis. FI episodes per week at baseline, 3 months and 6 months follow-up: SNS median 5.75 (IQR 5.75-15.5 ) [mean 11.4 (SD 12.0)], 2.5 (2-4.5) [4.0 (4.0)], 1.75 (1.5-5) [4.9 (6.9)], vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Three-Component Model of the Spinal Nerve Branching Pattern, Based on the View of the Lateral Somitic Frontier and Experimental Validation
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.29.227710; this version posted July 30, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Three-Component Model of the Spinal Nerve Branching Pattern, based on the View of the Lateral Somitic Frontier and Experimental Validation Shunsaku Homma1*, Takako Shimada1, Ikuo Wada2, Katsuji Kumaki3, Noboru Sato3, and Hiroyuki Yaginuma1 1 Department of Neuroanatomy and Embryology, 2 Department of Cell Science, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, 960-1295 JAPAN 3 Division of Gross Anatomy and Morphogenesis, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, 951-8510 JAPAN * Corresponding author: S. Homma, [email protected]. bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.29.227710; this version posted July 30, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. ABSTRACT One of the decisive questions about human gross anatomy is unmatching the adult branching pattern of the spinal nerve to the embryonic lineages of the peripheral target muscles. The two principal branches in the adult anatomy, the dorsal and ventral rami of the spinal nerve, innervate the intrinsic back muscles (epaxial muscles), as well as the body wall and appendicular muscles (hypaxial muscles), respectively. However, progenitors from the dorsomedial myotome develop into the back and proximal body wall muscles (primaxial muscles) within the sclerotome-derived connective tissue environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronic Female Pelvic Pain—Part 1: Clinical Pathoanatomy and Examination of the Pelvic Region
    TUTORIAL Chronic Female Pelvic Pain—Part 1: Clinical Pathoanatomy and Examination of the Pelvic Region Gail Apte, PT, ScD*; Patricia Nelson, PT, ScD†; Jean-Michel Brisme´e, PT, ScD*; Gregory Dedrick, PT, ScD*; Rafael Justiz III, MD‡; Phillip S. Sizer Jr., PT, PhD* *Center for Rehabilitation Research, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Lubbock, Texas; †Department of Physical Therapy, Eastern Washington University, Spokane, Washington; ‡Saint Anthony Pain Management, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, U.S.A. n Abstract: Chronic pelvic pain is defined as the presence symptoms (lumbosacral, coccygeal, sacroiliac, pelvic floor, of pain in the pelvic girdle region for over a 6-month per- groin or abdominal region) can be followed to establish a iod and can arise from the gynecologic, urologic, gastro- basis for managing the specific pain generator(s) and man- intestinal, and musculoskeletal systems. As 15% of women age tissue dysfunction. n experience pelvic pain at some time in their lives with yearly direct medical costs estimated at $2.8 billion, effective eval- Key Words: myofacial pain, pelvic pain, signs and symp- uation and management strategies of this condition are toms, female examination necessary. This merits a thorough discussion of a systematic approach to the evaluation of chronic pelvic pain condi- tions, including a careful history-taking and clinical exami- INTRODUCTION nation. The challenge of accurately diagnosing chronic pelvic pain resides in the degree of peripheral and central Pain in the pelvic region can arise from musculoskele- sensitization of the nervous system associated with the tal, gynecologic, urologic, gastrointestinal, and/or neu- chronicity of the symptoms, as well as the potential influ- rological conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis University of Amsterdam / with Summary in Dutch
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Development of the pelvic floor : implications for clinical anatomy Wallner, C. Publication date 2008 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Wallner, C. (2008). Development of the pelvic floor : implications for clinical anatomy. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:08 Oct 2021 DEVELOPMENT OF THE PELVIC FLOOR IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL ANATOMY CHRISTIAN WALLNER Development of the Pelvic Floor - Implications for Clinical Anatomy / by Christian Wallner / PhD Thesis University of Amsterdam / with summary in Dutch Cover design by Iskander T. Dekker This thesis was printed by PrintPartners Ipskamp ISBN 978-90-9023672-8 © 2008 by Christian Wallner No part of this thesis may be reproduced in any form, by any print, microfilm, or any other means, without prior written permission of the author.
    [Show full text]