DOCSLIB.ORG

Bottom Mount Combination Refrigerator-Freezers from Korea and Mexico

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bottom Mount Combination Refrigerator-Freezers from Korea and Mexico Bottom Mount Combination Refrigerator- Freezers from Korea and Mexico Investigation Nos. 701-TA-477 and 731-TA-1180-1181 (Final) Publication 4318 May 2012 U.S. International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 U.S. International Trade Commission COMMISSIONERS Deanna Tanner Okun, Chairman Irving A. Williamson, Vice Chairman Daniel R. Pearson Shara L. Aranoff Dean A. Pinkert David S. Johanson Robert B. Koopman Acting Director of Operations Staff assigned Christopher Cassise, Senior Investigator Ruben Mata, Industry Analyst John Benedetto, Economist Justin Jee, Accountant Karl von Schriltz, Attorney Mara Alexander, Statistician Jim McClure, Supervisory Investigator Address all communications to Secretary to the Commission United States International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 U.S. International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 www.usitc.gov Bottom Mount Combination Refrigerator- Freezers from Korea and Mexico Investigation Nos. 701-TA-477 and 731-TA-1180-1181 (Final) Publication 4318 May 2012 C O N T E N T S Page Determinations.................................................................. 1 Views of the Commission. ........................................................ 3 Part I: Introduction. ............................................................ I-1 Background.. ............................................................ I-1 Organization of report. ............................................... I-1 U.S. market summary. ............................................... I-2 Summary data and data sources. ............................................... I-3 Previous and related investigations. ............................................... I-3 Nature and extent of alleged sales at LTFV. ......................................... I-4 Nature of alleged countervailable subsidies. ......................................... I-5 The subject product. ........................................................... I-5 Commerce’s scope........................................................... I-5 Tariff treatment............................................................. I-6 Physical characteristics and uses................................................ I-7 Manufacturing process. ............................................... I-11 Product features............................................................. I-12 Domestic like product issues. ............................................... I-14 Top mount refrigerators vs. bottom mount refrigerators.. .......................... I-15 Side by Side refrigerators vs. bottom mount refrigerators. .......................... I-17 Part II: Conditions of competition in the U.S. market................................. II-1 U.S. market segments. ............................................... II-1 Channels of distribution. ............................................... II-3 Supply and demand considerations. ............................................... II-4 U.S. supply. ............................................................ II-4 U.S. demand. ............................................................ II-7 Substitutability issues. ............................................... II-12 Lead times. ............................................................ II-12 Factors affecting purchasing decisions. .......................................... II-13 Comparisons of domestic products, subject imports, and nonsubject imports. .......... II-17 Elasticity estimates. ............................................................ II-20 U.S. supply elasticity.. ............................................... II-20 U.S. demand elasticity.. ............................................... II-20 Substitution elasticity. ............................................... II-21 Part III: U.S. producers’ production, shipments, and employment. ..................... III-1 U.S. producers. ............................................................ III-1 U.S. capacity, production, and capacity utilization. ................................ III-2 U.S. producers’ U.S. shipments and export shipments. ................................ III-3 U.S. producers’ imports and purchases of imports..................................... III-3 U.S. producers’ inventories. ............................................... III-3 U.S. employment, wages, and productivity. ......................................... III-4 i C O N T E N T S Page Part IV: U.S. imports, apparent consumption, and market shares....................... IV-1 U.S. importers.. ............................................................ IV-1 U.S. imports. ............................................................ IV-2 Cumulation considerations....................................................... IV-3 Negligibility. ............................................................ IV-3 Critical circumstances........................................................... IV-4 Apparent U.S. consumption and market shares. ...................................... IV-5 Ratio of imports to U.S. production. ............................................... IV-6 Part V: Pricing and related information. ........................................... V-1 Factors affecting prices.. ............................................... V-1 Raw material costs.. ............................................... V-1 U.S. inland transportation costs.. ............................................... V-2 Transportation costs to the U.S. market. ......................................... V-2 Pricing practices. ............................................................ V-2 Pricing methods............................................................. V-2 Sales terms.. ............................................................ V-5 Direct and indirect discounts................................................... V-5 Price leaders............................................................... V-9 Price data.................................................................... V-9 Price data and discounts...................................................... V-11 Price trends and comparisons.................................................. V-12 Price comparisons. ............................................... V-17 Other data. ............................................................ V-18 Lost sales and lost revenues. ............................................... V-18 Part VI: Financial condition of U.S. producers....................................... VI-1 Background.. ............................................................ VI-1 Operations on bottom mount refrigerators. .......................................... VI-1 Capital expenditures and research and development expenses. .......................... VI-3 Assets and return on investment.. ............................................... VI-3 Capital and investment. ............................................... VI-3 Part VII: Threat considerations................................................... VII-1 The industry in Korea.. ............................................... VII-2 The industry in Mexico.. ............................................... VII-4 U.S. importers’ inventories.. ............................................... VII-7 U.S. importers’ current orders. ............................................... VII-7 Antidumping and countervailing duty orders in third-country markets. .................... VII-7 Information on producers in nonsubject countries. .................................... VII-7 ii Appendixes A. Federal Register notices....................................................... A-1 B. List of hearing witnesses. ............................................... B-1 C. Summary data.. ............................................................ C-1 D. Market studies of french door bottom mount refrigerators. .......................... D-1 E. CPI for major appliances and personal computers.. ................................ E-1 F. Other pricing data.. ........................................................... F-1 Note.--Information that would reveal confidential operations of individual concerns may not be published and therefore has been deleted from this report. Such deletions are indicated by asterisks. iii UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Investigation Nos. 701-TA-477 and 731-TA-1180-1181 (Final) BOTTOM MOUNT COMBINATION REFRIGERATOR-FREEZERS FROM KOREA AND MEXICO DETERMINATIONS On the basis of the record1 developed in the subject investigations, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, 2pursuant to sections 705(b) and 735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. '' 1671d(b) and 1673d(b)) (the Act), that an industry in the United States is not materially injured or threatened with material injury, and the establishment of an industry in the United States is not materially retarded, by reason of imports of bottom mount combination refrigerator-freezers from Korea, provided for in subheadings 8418.10.00, 8418.21.00, 8418.99.40, and 8418.99.80 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) has determined are subsidized by the Government of Korea and sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The Commission further determines that an industry in the United States is not materially injured or threatened with material injury, and the establishment of an industry in the United States is not materially retarded, by reason of imports from Mexico of bottom mount combination refrigerator-freezers,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final 2014 Return Shares for Electronics Manufacturers Washington State Electronic Products Recycling Program 4/24/2014
    Final 2014 Return Shares for Electronics Manufacturers Washington State Electronic Products Recycling Program 4/24/2014 The E-Cycle Washington program conducted 42 sampling events in 2013 gathering data on over 13,600 TVs, monitors and computers. That data was used to determine Return Share by manufacturer, summarized below. Identified Proportional Total Manufacturer Name Weight (lbs) Brands Return Orphan* Return Share (%) Share (%) Share (%) 605484 92.80937069 Sony Electronics, Inc. 66834 11.04 0.86 11.89 Panasonic Corporation of North America 54226 8.96 0.69 9.65 Philips Electronics 47779 7.89 0.61 8.50 Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. 43922 7.25 0.56 7.82 Dell Computer Corp. 43199 7.13 0.55 7.69 Thomson, Inc. USA 43078 7.11 0.55 7.67 Hewlett Packard 26370 4.36 0.34 4.69 JVC Americas Corp. 25979 4.29 0.33 4.62 Sharp Electronics Corporation 20274 3.35 0.26 3.61 Acer America Corp. 19327 3.19 0.25 3.44 LG Electronics USA, Inc. 18656 3.08 0.24 3.32 Mitsubishi Electric Visual Solutions America, Inc. 17906 2.96 0.23 3.19 Osram Sylvania 15226 2.51 0.19 2.71 Samsung Electronics Co. 14872 2.46 0.19 2.65 Apple 14537 2.40 0.19 2.59 Hitachi America, LTD. Digital Media Division 11235 1.86 0.14 2.00 ViewSonic Corp. World HQ 9934 1.64 0.13 1.77 Emerson Radio Corp. 7163 1.18 0.09 1.27 General Electric Co. 5691 0.94 0.07 1.01 NEC Display Solutions 4833 0.80 0.06 0.86 TMAX Digital, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisher & Paykel Appliances Holdings Limited
    FISHER & PAYKEL APPLIANCES HOLDINGS LIMITED TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT — IN RELATION TO A TAKEOVER OFFER BY HAIER NEW ZEALAND INVESTMENT HOLDING COMPANY LIMITED — 4 OCTOBER 2012 For personal use only For personal use only COVER: PHASE 7 DISHDRAWER TM DISHWASHER FISHER & PAYKEL APPLIANCES HOLDINGS LIMITED TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT CHAIRMAN’S LETTER 03 TARGET COMPANY STATEMENT (TAKEOVERS CODE DISCLOSURES) 07 SCHEDULE 1 — 4 25 For personal use only APPENDIX: INDEPENDENT ADVISER’S REPORT 37 CHAIRMAN’S LETTER For personal use only CHAIRMAN’S LETTER P3 Dear Shareholder Haier New Zealand Investment Holding Company Limited (“Haier”) has offered $1.20 per share to buy your shares in Fisher & Paykel Appliances Holdings Limited (“FPA”) by means of a formal takeover offer (the Offer“ ”). •• INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS RECOMMEND DO NOT ACCEPT HAIER’S OFFER •• The independent directors of FPA (Dr Keith Turner, Mr Philip Lough, Ms Lynley Marshall and Mr Bill Roest) (the “Independent Directors”) unanimously recommend that shareholders do not accept the Offer from Haier. In making their recommendation, the Independent Directors have carefully considered a full range of expert advice available to them. Therefore you should take no action. The principal reasons for recommending that shareholders do not accept are: _ Having regard to a full range of expert advice now available to the Independent Directors (including the Independent Adviser’s valuation range of $1.28 to $1.57 per FPA Share), the Independent Directors consider that the Offer of $1.20 per FPA Share does not adequately reflect their view of the value of FPA based on their confidence in the strategic direction of the Company; and _ FPA is in a strong financial position and, as the Independent Adviser notes, FPA is at a “relatively early stage of implementation of the company’s comprehensive rebuilding strategy”.
    [Show full text]
  • ADEPT*Preview
    20/2006 18 May/mai 2006 PCT Gazette - Section III - Gazette du PCT 14517 SECTION III WEEKLY INDEXES INDEX HEBDOMADAIRES INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION NUMBERS AND CORRESPONDING INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION NUMBERS NUMÉROS DES DEMANDES INTERNATIONALES ET NUMÉROS DE PUBLICATION INTERNATIONALE CORRESPONDANTS International International International International International International Application Publication Application Publication Application Publication Numbers Numbers Numbers Numbers Numbers Numbers Numéros des Numéros de Numéros des Numéros de Numéros des Numéros de demandes publication demandes publication demandes publication internationales internationale internationales internationale internationales internationale AT BR CN PCT/AT2005/000378 WO 2006/050543 PCT/BR2005/000232 WO 2006/050592 PCT/CN2004/001561 WO 2006/050641 PCT/AT2005/000382 WO 2006/050544 PCT/BR2005/000235 WO 2006/050593 PCT/CN2004/001562 WO 2006/050642 PCT/AT2005/000426 WO 2006/050545 PCT/CN2005/000204 WO 2006/050643 PCT/AT2005/000432 WO 2006/050546 BY PCT/CN2005/000322 WO 2006/050644 PCT/AT2005/000435 WO 2006/050547 PCT/BY2005/000013 WO 2006/050594 PCT/CN2005/000476 WO 2006/050645 PCT/AT2005/000450 WO 2006/050548 PCT/CN2005/000573 WO 2006/050646 PCT/AT2005/000452 WO 2006/050549 CA PCT/CN2005/000777 WO 2006/050647 PCT/AT2005/000457 WO 2006/050550 PCT/CA2005/001448 WO 2006/050595 PCT/CN2005/001235 WO 2006/050648 PCT/AT2005/000458 WO 2006/050551 PCT/CA2005/001449 WO 2006/050596 PCT/CN2005/001463 WO 2006/050649 PCT/CA2005/001545 WO 2006/050597 PCT/CN2005/001495 WO 2006/050650
    [Show full text]
  • Good Design 2012 Awarded Product Designs and Graphics and Packaging
    GOOD DESIGN 2012 AWARDED PRODUCT DESIGNS AND GRAPHICS AND PACKAGING THE CHICAGO ATHENAEUM: MUSEUM OF ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN THE EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR ARCHITECTURE ART DESIGN AND URBAN STUDIES ELECTRONICS 2012 JBL Professional VTX Line Array, 2010-2012 Designers: Myk Lum, Daniel Yoon, Joe Morin, William Yeh, and Ken Sugimoto, LDA LLC., Irvine, California, USA Manufacturer: JBL Professional, Northridge, California, USA Jabra STONE 2 Wireless Bluetooth® Headsets, 2010 Designers: Johan Birger, Johan Birger AB., Malmo, Sweden Manufacturer: GN Store Nord A/S., Ballerup, Denmark Jabra SPORT Wireless Bluetooth® Headsets, 2011 Designers: Johan Birger, Johan Birger AB., Malmo, Sweden Manufacturer: GN Store Nord A/S., Ballerup, Denmark Dell XPS 13 Ultrabook, 2012 Designers: Dell Inc., Round Rock, Texas, USA Manufacturer: Dell Inc., Round Rock, Texas, USA Hewlett-Packard webcam HD 5210, 2010-2011 Designers: BMW Group Designworks USA, Newbury Park, California, USA Manufacturer: Hewlett-Packard Co., Palo Alto, California, USA Siragon AIO 9000 Series All-in-One Computer, 2010-2011 Designers: BMW Group Designworks USA, Newbury Park, California, USA Manufacturer: Siragon C.A., Valencia, Venezuela Thermaltake Level 10 M Mouse, 2012 Designers: BMW Group Designworks USA, Newbury Park, California, USA Manufacturer: Thermaltake Technology Co., Ltd., Taipei City, Taiwan Sennheiser S2 Digital Aviation Headset, 2011 Designers: BMW Group Designworks USA, Newbury Park, California, USA Manufacturer: Sennheiser Electronic GmbH & Co. KG., Wedemark, Germany Etón FRX Field Radio Line, 2011 Designers: Dan Harden, Hiro Teranishi, and Sam Benavidez, Whipsaw, Inc., San Jose, California, USA Manufacturer: Etón Corporation, Palo Alto, California, USA Etón Rukus Bluetooth Stereo Line, 2011 Designers: Dan Harden and Kyle Buzzard, Whipsaw, Inc., San Jose, California, USA Manufacturer: Etón Corporation, Palo Alto, California, USA Good Design Awards 2012 Page 1 of 49 December 15, © 1992-2012 The Chicago Athenaeum - Use of this website as stated in our legal statement.
    [Show full text]
  • NUMERAZIONE CERTIFICATI DI RISPONDENZA Rev. 1
    Società marca TELE System S.p.A. TELE System THOMSON MULTIMEDIA TELEFUNKEN THOMSON MULTIMEDIA TELEFUNKEN SAMSUNG ITALIA S.p.A. SAMSUNG SAMSUNG ITALIA S.p.A. SAMSUNG GRUNDIG ITALIANA S.p.A. GRUNDIG GRUNDIG ITALIANA S.p.A. GRUNDIG GRUNDIG ITALIANA S.p.A. GRUNDIG GRUNDIG ITALIANA S.p.A. GRUNDIG GRUNDIG ITALIANA S.p.A. GRUNDIG GRUNDIG ITALIANA S.p.A. GRUNDIG GRUNDIG ITALIANA S.p.A. GRUNDIG GRUNDIG ITALIANA S.p.A. GRUNDIG GRUNDIG ITALIANA S.p.A. GRUNDIG GRUNDIG ITALIANA S.p.A. GRUNDIG GRUNDIG ITALIANA S.p.A. GRUNDIG RECO S.p.A. UNITED ROADSTAR ITALIA S.p.A. ROADSTAR ROADSTAR ITALIA S.p.A. ROADSTAR ROADSTAR ITALIA S.p.A. ROADSTAR ROADSTAR ITALIA S.p.A. ROADSTAR ROADSTAR ITALIA S.p.A. ROADSTAR ROADSTAR ITALIA S.p.A. ROADSTAR ROADSTAR ITALIA S.p.A. ROADSTAR COMINTER S.p.A. SCOTT THOMSON MULTIMEDIA TELEFUNKEN RECO S.p.A. FUNAI GRUNDIG ITALIANA S.p.A. GRUNDIG GRUNDIG ITALIANA S.p.A. GRUNDIG GRUNDIG ITALIANA S.p.A. GRUNDIG GRUNDIG ITALIANA S.p.A. GRUNDIG RECO S.p.A. FUNAI RECO S.p.A. FUNAI RECO S.p.A. FUNAI RECO S.p.A. FUNAI RECO S.p.A. UNITED KON.EL.CO S.p.A. GBC KON.EL.CO S.p.A. GBC RECO S.p.A. FUNAI LG ELECTRONICS ITALIA S.p.A. LG RECO S.p.A. UNITED TOSHIBA EUROPE GmbH TOSHIBA TOSHIBA EUROPE GmbH TOSHIBA S.E.I. SOC. ELETTR. ITALIANA ORION SONY ITALIA S.p.A. SONY MELCHIONI S.p.A. IRRADIO SONY ITALIA S.p.A.
    [Show full text]
  • JOINT INDUSTRY COMMENTS on WEEE2 Draft Implementing Regulation Establishing a Common Methodology for the Calculation of “The
    JOINT INDUSTRY COMMENTS on WEEE2 Draft Implementing Regulation establishing a Common Methodology for the Calculation of “the weight of EEE placed on the national market in each Member State” and a Common Methodology for the Calculation of the “Quantity of WEEE Generated by Weight in each Member State” Brussels, 7 February 2017 In view of the upcoming vote on 13th February 2017 of the members of the Technical Adaptation Committee, we would like to provide the following observations on the latest draft Commission Implementing Regulation establishing a common methodology for the calculation of “the weight of electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) placed on the national market in each Member State” and a common methodology for the calculation of “the quantity of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) generated by weight in each Member State”: • We thank the Commission for its efforts to establish common methodologies both for the calculation EEE POM and WEEE generated collection targets. On the one hand, these methodologies are crucial to ensure a clear and harmonised implementation of the collection target in each Member State. On the other hand, it is essential that the methodologies lead to fair targets, which are based on objective, clear and transparent criteria. Member States are of course free to choose, which of the two approaches they use to demonstrate the achievement of the collection rate from 2019 onwards. • We fully support the following changes made by the Commission compared to the 2015 draft version: o Calculation of the weight of EEE placed on the market of a Member State (POM) – Article 3 of the Draft Implementing Regulation: it is now clear that the first source of information is the information provided by the producers.
    [Show full text]
  • CECED Comments on ACER FG on Electricity Balancing
    25 June 2012 CECED input to the Consultation on ACER’S Framework Guidelines on Electricity Balancing Smart Grids are considered one of the key investment areas for a sustainable future: they are a tool for optimising energy production and usage by exploiting flexibility in the supply and demand of electricity. On the demand side, household appliances count for about 30% of energy consumption in residential premises, therefore they are one of the best candidates to become “smart”, i.e. built to interact with Smart Grids. CECED1 represents the household appliance industry, a relevant partner in the development of Smart Grids in Europe. We believe that as more and more appliances become smart, a significant curtailment of consumption will be possible upon request at collective or individual level. It implies a contribution to grid balancing through implementation of Demand-Response programs. In short, if well managed, smart appliances can allow the consumer to play a significant role in controlling the demand side with minimum impact on his/her needs and habits in a properly designed smart grid. CECED is convinced that demand-side resources will play a major role in the stability and performance of future European energy networks if relevant decisions are taken with respect to system requirements. Such decisions will have significant implications, at political, technical, and economic levels for consumers and the development of demand side resources’ market in Europe. The rules for trading the provision of system balancing services, including power reserve rules, should allow for demand side response, while ensuring effective competition and benefit for customers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision for the Home Appliance Industry in Europe
    HOME APPLIANCE 2025: CALL TO ACTION HOME APPLIANCE 2025: A VISION FOR THE HOME APPLIANCE INDUSTRY IN EUROPE Promoting jobs, growth, skills, innovation and sustainability CECED European Committee of Domestic Equipment Manufacturers 1 HOME APPLIANCE 2025: CALL TO ACTION Index A message from the President ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Context | Home appliances: working for Europe ..............................................................................................................................................5 Underpinning the European way of life with innovation ........................................................................................................................................................................ 5 A European manufacturing success story ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 High wage, highly skilled jobs ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 On the frontline of ecodesign, recycling and customer value ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Industry Letter on Ecodesign
    Brussels, Monday, October 24, 2016 Dear President, Dear Vice-Presidents, Dear Commissioners, We understand that you will discuss in the coming weeks the future of the Ecodesign Framework. Our industry organisations, representing the heating, cooling, refrigeration, ventilation, household appliance and ICT & consumer electronics sectors, strongly support Ecodesign and Energy Labelling which, for several product groups, have proven very successful and contributed to the EU’s energy and climate goals by pushing and pulling the market towards more energy efficient products. However, to ensure that this success story continues, we would like to emphasize some key points which, in our view, require urgent attention: First, we urge you to publish without delay already voted Ecodesign measures, such as Lot 21 and omnibus Regulation on tolerances, at the very latest with the Winter Package. Indeed, the delay in publication in the Official Journal of already voted Ecodesign measures creates an unmanageable situation for industry, including SMEs, which invests considerable resources to improve the energy efficiency of products and needs legal certainty to re-design them and comply with the new requirements. Second, complement the current Ecodesign and Energy Labelling policies with measures to support the market uptake of efficient products. For example, raise consumer awareness about the benefits of energy efficiency and help them make investments; in the EPBD revision, promote inspections of installed appliances which can lead to planned replacements. Finally, Ecodesign measures have been effective because they have regulated measurable, verifiable parameters of the whole system, such as the energy consumption in use on the basis of a clear and transparent methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the 2013 Top 100 Report
    COVER STORY | BY ALI ACKERMAN & ALARICE PADILLA Consumer confidence was a bit manic in 2012, hitting a five-year high in November and then dropping again in December as consumers doubted an end to the fiscal cliff, according toThe University of Mich- igan Consumer Sentiment Index. This uncertainty plays out in the results of CGT’s annual list of the top- performing public consumer goods companies. The vertical lists across 10 categories show a mixture of bright and dark spots — proving that some companies did a great job of capturing the consumer when and TOP where they could while others missed opportunities. Here is a breakdown of the rules and guidelines that we use to determine the players in each category: Company Rank: 2012 annual revenue or the equivalent is used to determine each company’s placement on the Top 100 list and on each vertical list. All financial information was sourced from annual reports and press releases. Revenue for each company is reported in millions of U.S. dollars ($M). If a company reported revenue in a currency other than U.S. dollars, and did not provide the U.S. dollar equivalent in its annual report, then the figure was subject to live exchange rates at press time (between November 8-14, 2013). Year-over-year gains and losses are reported based on information from the aforementioned sources. The company with the greatest sales gains per category is identified as the “Growth Leader”. Company Inclusion: Because revenue for most private companies is not readily available, the lists only in- clude publicly traded companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation
    CONSULTATION Date: 26/10/2017 One-month consultation on two new CECED draft Code of Conducts on marking of appliances for end-of-life treatment Brussels, October 26th, 2017 CECED, representing the home appliance industry in Europe, launches today a one-month consultation on its new draft Code of Conducts on marking appliances for end-of-life. These Codes of Conduct are launched in the context of the circular economy, regular bilateral discussions between producers and recyclers over the last years, and producers’ obligations under the WEEE Directive Article 15 to provide treatment facilities with information necessary to ensure sound treatment of WEEE. With this voluntary action, CECED members are committed to show the home appliance industry’s proactivity on end-of-life and resource efficiency. CECED members have been working on developing two code of conducts to ease the identification at end-of-life of certain types of appliances to support treatment facilities and recyclers in sorting appliances for sound collection and treatment at the end-of-life. This will facilitate safer and environmentally sound treatment of these types of appliances. With this initiative, CECED members aspire to contribute to improving WEEE treatment by encouraging the ongoing productive dialogue with recyclers, providing them with useful information and indications on the future needs of recycling technologies, while sending a positive signal to the market. What is the scope of each draft Code of Conduct? Household refrigerating appliances containing vacuum insulation panels & heat pump tumble dryers, washer dryers, washing machines and dishwashers containing F-Gases. What is the content of the two draft Code of Conducts? The draft code of conducts will provide a set of guidelines on a common marking for each type of appliances under the scope of the Codes.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Manual 42” PLASMA PDP TV CHASSIS : SP-200P MODEL : DPP-4272NHS
    S/M NO. : DSP200PEF0 Service Manual 42” PLASMA PDP TV CHASSIS : SP-200P MODEL : DPP-4272NHS Caution : In this Manual, some parts can be changed for improving. their performance without notice in the parts list. So, if you need the latest parts information, please refer to PPL(Parts Price List)in Service Information Center(http://svc.dwe.co.kr) DAEWOO ELECTRONICS Corp. http : //svc.dwe.co.kr Jun. 2004 Contents I. Parts with the exception of MODULE 1. Safety Precautions 2 2. Product Specification 3 2-1. SPECIFICATION 3 2-2. Available Input Signal 5 2-3. Remote Control Setup Code 6 3. BLOCK DIAGRAM 14 4. Description Of A/V and power 15 4-1. Block Diagram of main IC and TP 15 4-2. Overview 16 4-3. POWER PCB 24 4-4. Interface with PDP module 26 5. SERVICE MODE 27 5-1. Checking initial menu data 27 5-2. Entering SERVICE MODE 28 5-3. Description Of SERVICE MODE Items 30 6. Adjusting Method 33 6-1. Adjusting WHITE BALANCE 33 6-2. Adjusting POWER PCB 34 7. SOFTWARE UPGRADE Method 36 8. Main PCB Trouble Diagnosis 39 8-1. MAIN & SUB PCB Trouble Diagnosis 39 8-2. POWER PCB Trouble Diagnosis 46 9. TROUBLE DIAGNOSIS 47 9-1. Facts You Must Know When Diagnosing And Repairing 47 9-2. Typical Symptoms of PCB problem or bad Connection 47 9-3. Trouble Diagnosis and Repairing Method for Representative Symptoms 48 10. ASSEMBLY LIST 53 11. STRUCTURE OF PDP SET 54 12. EXPLODED VIEW 59 II. Parts of MODULE 1.
    [Show full text]