2010 Audit of the Sydney Drinking Water Catchment Volume 2 – Appendices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2010 Audit of the Sydney Drinking Water Catchment Volume 2 – Appendices 2010 Audit of the Sydney Drinking Water Catchment Volume 2 – Appendices Report to the Minister for Water 2010 Audit of the Sydney Drinking Water Catchment Volume 2 – Appendices Report to the Minister for Water © 2010 State of NSW and Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW. The Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water and State of NSW are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced for educational or non-commercial purposes in whole or in part, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs and images. Published by: Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW 59 Goulburn Street, Sydney PO Box A290 Sydney South 1232 Ph: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Ph: 131 555 (environment information and publications requests) Ph: 1300 361 967 (national parks, climate change and energy efficiency information and publications requests) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au Report pollution and environmental incidents Environment Line: 131 555 (NSW only) or [email protected] See also www.environment.nsw.gov.au/pollution Cover photos: Russell Cox Top: Cordeaux River near Pheasants Nest Weir Bottom row from left: 1. Fitzroy Falls 2. Gully erosion Wollondilly River sub-catchment 3. Tallowa Dam 4. Agriculture Upper Nepean River sub-catchment ISBN 978 1 74293 027 5 DECCW 2010/974 November 2010 Printed on recycled paper Contents Volume 1: Main report Summary Recommendations Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 Audit Methodology Chapter 3 Land Use and Human Settlements Chapter 4 Biodiversity and Habitats Chapter 5 Water Availability Chapter 6 Water Quality Chapter 7 Audit Recomendations Volume 2: Appendices Appendix A: Roles and responsibilities of stakeholders ...........................1 Appendix B: List of parties that responded to the audit ............................7 Appendix C: Sub-catchment summaries .....................................................9 Upper Coxs River........................................................................................................10 Mid Coxs River sub-catchment....................................................................................21 Lower Coxs River........................................................................................................32 Grose River ................................................................................................................40 Kowmung River ..........................................................................................................46 Lake Burragorang .......................................................................................................53 Werriberri Creek .........................................................................................................60 Little River...................................................................................................................68 Nattai River.................................................................................................................75 Upper Nepean River ...................................................................................................83 Upper Wollondilly River...............................................................................................96 Wollondilly River ....................................................................................................... 104 Mulwaree River......................................................................................................... 115 Wingecarribee River.................................................................................................. 122 Woronora River Sub-catchment (Georges River Catchment)..................................... 132 Shoalhaven Catchment................................................................................... 141 Kangaroo River......................................................................................................... 142 Nerrimunga River...................................................................................................... 152 Bungonia Creek ........................................................................................................ 159 Boro Creek ............................................................................................................... 167 Mid Shoalhaven River............................................................................................... 174 Endrick River ............................................................................................................ 181 Reedy Creek............................................................................................................. 187 Mongarlowe River..................................................................................................... 194 Braidwood................................................................................................................. 201 Back and Round Mountain Creeks............................................................................ 208 Jerrabattgulla Creek.................................................................................................. 214 Upper Shoalhaven River ........................................................................................... 220 References....................................................................................................... 226 Appendix D: Major projects in the Catchment ........................................230 Appendix E: Water sharing plan management zones.............................238 Appendix F: Flow exceedance curves .....................................................243 Flow exceedance curves (Cumulative Distribution Function) Hawkesbury–Nepean Catchment ................................................................... 243 Flow Exceedance Curves (Cumulative Distribution Function) Woronora Catchment...................................................................................... 253 Flow Exceedance Curves (Cumulative Distribution Function) Shoalhaven Catchment................................................................................... 255 Appendix G: River Water Quality..............................................................260 Dam and Reservoir Water Quality .................................................................. 292 Appendix A: Roles and responsibilities of stakeholders Sydney Catchment Authority The roles and responsibilities of the Sydney Catchment Authority (SCA) are specified by the Sydney Water Catchment Management Act 1998. Section 13 of this Act identifies the SCA’s role to manage and protect the catchment areas and catchment infrastructure works, be it a supplier of bulk water, or to regulate certain activities within, or affecting, the outer catchment and inner catchment areas. The principal objectives of the SCA, defined in the Act, are to ensure the catchment areas and infrastructure are managed and protected to promote water quality, the protection of public health and safety and the protection of the environment. The Act also enables an Operating Licence to be issued to authorise the SCA to provide, construct, operate, manage and maintain systems and services, in order to achieve its objectives. The Act also requires the SCA to make arrangements with Sydney Water Corporation on the standard of the quality of the water supplied from the Sydney Drinking Water Catchment (the Catchment) to Sydney Water. The Bulk Water Supply Agreement (BWSA) addresses the supply of raw water to customers (primarily Sydney Water). This agreement specifies the quality of raw water that is to be supplied to the water filtration plants. The SCA has a Water Management Licence, administered by the NSW Office of Water (NOW – formerly Department of Water and Energy), for its activities in relation to the abstraction and use of water from identified water sources and water management works. The licence also specifies the quantity of water that must be made available for environmental purposes. The SCA regulates activities in the special and controlled areas likely to impact on its ability to supply high quality raw water to its customers through the Sydney Water Catchment Management Regulation 2008. The SCA jointly manages the Special Areas with the Department of Environment Climate Change and Water (DECCW) under the Special Areas Strategic Plans of Management. The Plan sets the framework for a high level of protection of the natural and cultural heritage in these areas, and maintain the areas as intact buffers for the storages. The Sydney Water Catchment Management Regulation 2008 allows SCA to exercise power under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 for non- scheduled activities. These powers may be exercised when protecting catchment areas or protecting and enhancing the quality of water in catchment areas. The SCA is also involved in the development and assessment processes in the Catchment under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act) through a concurrence role of the Regional Environmental Plan N.1 (REP 1) which replaces the previous SEPP 58, assisting in the protection of Sydney’s drinking water supply. Appendix A 1 Department of Environment Climate Change and Water NSW On 11 June 2009, the Premier announced significant public sector reforms to
Recommended publications
  • The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves
    The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves Project funded under the Central Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division Biodiversity Data Priorities Program Conservation Assessment and Data Unit Conservation Programs and Planning Branch, Metropolitan Environmental Protection and Regulation Division Department of Environment and Conservation ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CADU (Central) Manager Special thanks to: Julie Ravallion Nattai NP Area staff for providing general assistance as well as their knowledge of the CADU (Central) Bioregional Data Group area, especially: Raf Pedroza and Adrian Coordinator Johnstone. Daniel Connolly Citation CADU (Central) Flora Project Officer DEC (2004) The Native Vegetation of the Nattai Nathan Kearnes and Bargo Reserves. Unpublished Report. Department of Environment and Conservation, CADU (Central) GIS, Data Management and Hurstville. Database Coordinator This report was funded by the Central Peter Ewin Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division, Biodiversity Survey Priorities Program. Logistics and Survey Planning All photographs are held by DEC. To obtain a Nathan Kearnes copy please contact the Bioregional Data Group Coordinator, DEC Hurstville Field Surveyors David Thomas Cover Photos Teresa James Nathan Kearnes Feature Photo (Daniel Connolly) Daniel Connolly White-striped Freetail-bat (Michael Todd), Rock Peter Ewin Plate-Heath Mallee (DEC) Black Crevice-skink (David O’Connor) Aerial Photo Interpretation Tall Moist Blue Gum Forest (DEC) Ian Roberts (Nattai and Bargo, this report; Rainforest (DEC) Woronora, 2003; Western Sydney, 1999) Short-beaked Echidna (D. O’Connor) Bob Wilson (Warragamba, 2003) Grey Gum (Daniel Connolly) Pintech (Pty Ltd) Red-crowned Toadlet (Dave Hunter) Data Analysis ISBN 07313 6851 7 Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly Report Writing and Map Production Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report describes the distribution and composition of the native vegetation within and immediately surrounding Nattai National Park, Nattai State Conservation Area and Bargo State Conservation Area.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of the Kowmung River at Cedar Ford, Australia
    International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning Vol. 16, No. 3, June, 2021, pp. 497-501 Journal homepage: http://iieta.org/journals/ijsdp Application of Deep Learning Method for Daily Streamflow Time-Series Prediction: A Case Study of the Kowmung River at Cedar Ford, Australia Sarmad Dashti Latif1*, Ali Najah Ahmed2 1 Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Komar University of Science and Technology, Sulaimany 46001, Kurdistan Region, Iraq 2 Institute for Energy Infrastructure (IEI), Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Kajang 43000, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia Corresponding Author Email: [email protected] https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.160310 ABSTRACT Received: 12 May 2020 Sustainable management of water supplies faces a comprehensive challenge due to global Accepted: 9 December 2020 climate change. Improving forecasts of streamflow based on erratic precipitation is a significant activity nowadays. In recent years, the techniques of data-driven have been widely Keywords: used in the hydrological parameter’s prediction especially streamflow. In the current research, streamflow prediction, artificial a deep learning model namely Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and two conventional intelligence, deep learning, machine machine learning models namely, Random Forest (RF), and Tree Boost (TB) were used to learning, LSTM, random forest, tree boost predict the streamflow of the Kowmung river at Cedar Ford in Australia. Different scenarios proposed to determine the optimal combination of input predictor variables, and the input predictor variables were selected based on the auto-correlation function (ACF). Model output was evaluated using indices of the root mean square error (RMSE), and the Nash and Sutcliffe coefficient (NSE). The findings showed that the LSTM model outperformed RF and TB in predicting the streamflow with RMSE and NSE equal to 102.411, and 0.911 respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Dubbo Zirconia Project
    Dubbo Zirconia Project Aquatic Ecology Assessment Prepared by Alison Hunt & Associates September 2013 Specialist Consultant Studies Compendium Volume 2, Part 7 This page has intentionally been left blank Aquatic Ecology Assessment Prepared for: R.W. Corkery & Co. Pty Limited 62 Hill Street ORANGE NSW 2800 Tel: (02) 6362 5411 Fax: (02) 6361 3622 Email: [email protected] On behalf of: Australian Zirconia Ltd 65 Burswood Road BURSWOOD WA 6100 Tel: (08) 9227 5677 Fax: (08) 9227 8178 Email: [email protected] Prepared by: Alison Hunt & Associates 8 Duncan Street ARNCLIFFE NSW 2205 Tel: (02) 9599 0402 Email: [email protected] September 2013 Alison Hunt & Associates SPECIALIST CONSULTANT STUDIES AUSTRALIAN ZIRCONIA LTD Part 7: Aquatic Ecology Assessment Dubbo Zirconia Project Report No. 545/05 This Copyright is included for the protection of this document COPYRIGHT © Alison Hunt & Associates, 2013 and © Australian Zirconia Ltd, 2013 All intellectual property and copyright reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, 1968, no part of this report may be reproduced, transmitted, stored in a retrieval system or adapted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without written permission. Enquiries should be addressed to Alison Hunt & Associates. Alison Hunt & Associates RW CORKERY & CO. PTY. LIMITED AUSTRALIAN ZIRCONIA LTD Dubbo Zirconia Project Aquatic Ecology Final September 2013 SPECIALIST CONSULTANT STUDIES AUSTRALIAN ZIRCONIA LTD Part 7: Aquatic Ecology Assessment Dubbo Zirconia Project Report No. 545/05 SUMMARY Alison Hunt & Associates Pty Ltd was commissioned by RW Corkery & Co Pty Limited, on behalf of Australian Zirconia Limited (AZL), to undertake an assessment of aquatic ecology for the proposed development of the Dubbo Zirconia Project (DZP), which would be located at Toongi, approximately 25 km south of Dubbo in Central West NSW.
    [Show full text]
  • Livestock, Land Cover, and Environmental History: The
    Livestock,Land Cover, and Environmental History: The Tablelandsof New SouthWales, Australia, 1820-1920 KarlW Butzer*and David M. Helgren** *DepartmentofGeography and the Environment, University ofTexas at Austin **DepartmentofGeography, SanJose State University Forsoutheastern Australia, arrival of the First Fleet in 1788raises similar issues in environmental history as the 1492landing of Columbus in the Americas. But Anglo-Australian settlement isyounger and better documented, bothin termsof scientific proxy data and historical sources, which include data on stockingrates that generally werelight. Environmental concerns were voiced early, and a livelydebate continues both among professionals andthe lay public, with Australian geographers playing a major academic and applied role. This article addresses environmentaldegradation often attributed to earlypastoralism (and implicit clearance) in theTablelands of NewSouth Wales. Methods include: (1) comparisonofwell-reported travel itineraries of1817-1833 with mod- ernland cover and streamchannels; (2) criticalreviews of high-resolutionpollen profiles and theissues of Aboriginalvs. Anglo-Australian fireecology; and (3) identificationofsoil erosion and gullying both before and afterAnglo-Australian intrusion. The results indicate that (a) landcover of the Tablelands islittle changed since priorto Contact,although some species are less common, while invasive genera of legumes have modified the groundcover; (b) thecharcoal trace in pollen profiles prior to Contact supports an ecologicalimpact
    [Show full text]
  • FMR Corn Trail Campaign FACT SHEET
    HELP STOP LOGGING ALONG OUR HISTORIC CORN TRAIL Friends of the Mongarlowe River, PO Box 378 BRAIDWOOD NSW 2622 [email protected] 1 Excerpt from South Coast Forest Map, Forestry Corporation, June 2013 Friends of the Mongarlowe River, PO Box 378 BRAIDWOOD NSW 2622 [email protected] 2 HELP STOP LOGGING ALONG There are two ways to access the Corn Trail, one from the high country (upper access) and one from OUR HISTORIC CORN TRAIL below (lower access). Upper access: From the Dasyurus picnic area beside the upper reaches of the FACT SHEET Mongarlowe River in the Monga National Park. This walk will take approx: 5-6 hours (16 kilometres) This paper has been written by locals to assist Lower access: Turn off the Kings Highway 7 km you to take action to stop the logging now below the top of the Clyde Mountain descent and happening above our beloved Corn Trail and the drive 40 minutes along Misty Mountain Rd to a Buckenbowra river that flows to the coast. clearing sufficient to park approximately 5 cars. The walk begins down a gravel track, at the Buckenbowra It aims to achieve three goals: River; a 6 hour walk up to the Mongarlowe River. 1. An immediate Moratorium on logging in HOW HAVE THE FORESTS BEEN PROTECTED? compartments of the Buckenbowra State Forest known as #516 and #517; The Friends of the Mongarlowe River (FMR), 2. Commitments to incorporate compartments established by Judith Wright, is now in its 33rd year. #516 and #517 into the surrounding Monga FMR successfully dedicated itself during the 1990s to National Park; protecting the forests from which the Mongarlowe 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyde Park Management Plan
    Hyde Park Reserve Hartley Plan of Management April 2008 Prepared by Lithgow City Council HYDE PARK RESERVE HARTLEY PLAN OF MANAGEMENT Hyde Park Reserve Plan of Management Prepared by March 2008 Acknowledgements Staff of the Community and Culture Division, Community and Corporate Department of Lithgow City Council prepared this plan of management with financial assistance from the NSW Department of Lands. Valuable information and comments were provided by: NSW Department of Lands Wiradjuri Council of Elders Gundungurra Tribal Council members of the Wiradjuri & Gundungurra communities members of the local community and neighbours to the Reserve Lithgow Oberon Landcare Association Central Tablelands Rural Lands Protection Board Lithgow Rural Fire Service Upper Macquarie County Council members of the Hartley District Progress Association Helen Drewe for valuable input on the flora of Hyde Park Reserve Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research, Canberra Tracy Williams - for valuable input on Reserve issues & uses Department of Environment & Conservation (DECC) NW Branch Dave Noble NPWS (DECC) Blackheath DECC Heritage Unit Sydney Photographs T. Kidd This Hyde Park Plan of Management incorporates a draft Plan of Management prepared in April 2003. Lithgow City Council April 2008 2 HYDE PARK RESERVE HARTLEY PLAN OF MANAGEMENT FOREWORD 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 PART 1 – INTRODUCTION 7 1.0 INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 PURPOSE OF A PLAN OF MANAGEMENT 8 1.2 LAND TO WHICH THE PLAN OF MANAGEMENT APPLIES 9 1.3 GENERAL RESERVE
    [Show full text]
  • August 2014 “Nature Conservation Saves for Tomorrow”
    Blue Mountains Conservation Society Inc. Issue No. 317 HUT NEWS August 2014 “Nature Conservation Saves for Tomorrow” Blue Mountains Conservation Society presents Blue Mountains Wild River ... The Wollangambe Sunday 17th August, 2pm Wentworth Falls School of Arts (Cnr Great Western Highway and Adele Avenue) The Wollangambe River is just to the north of Mt. Wilson and for most of its 57km length it is within the World Heritage Blue Mountains and Wollemi National Parks, and the Wollemi Wilderness. Our August meeting is about the beauty of this river and the beast that threatens it. Andy Macqueen will talk about the river from an historical and geographical perspective. Dr Ian Wright and Nakia Belmer will provide a “state of health” of the river. And all of this will be accompanied by glorious images from Ian Brown and Society members. Read more on page 5. Visitors are very welcome. Photos: Wild River gorge, by Ian Brown; Ian Wright take samples to test the health of the river, by Nakia Belmer. BMCS NURSERY PLANT SALES Threatened Species Day Yabbies on the menu! Lawson Nursery, Wednesday Threatened Species Day, 7th September, The Little Pied Cormorant is a and Saturday mornings, 9am to commemorates the death of the last regular visitor to the duck pond in noon. Thylacine (Tasmanian tiger - Thylacinus the Blackheath Memorial Park. The nursery is located in the cynocephalus) at Hobart Zoo in 1936. He rests on one of his favourite Lawson Industrial Area on the Events are held nationally throughout rocks. corner of Park and Cascade September - Biodiversity Month. Streets, opposite Federation Changes to the landscape and native Building Materials - see map on our website habitat as a result of human activity have www.bluemountains.org.au).
    [Show full text]
  • Braidwood Gold
    FEBRUARY 2007 PRIMEFACT 559 (REPLACES MINFACT 56) Braidwood gold Mineral Resources Shoalhaven, between the Bombay Crossing and Reedy Creek. The information below covers that part of the The survey delineated an area of alluvials about 3 Shoalhaven Basin between Jembaicumbene Creek 400 hectares in extent, with depths up to 46m. In and the Mongarlowe River (not including the the southern part of the area (712 hectares) the latter). average thickness was estimated at 9m, giving 75 The area was largely incorporated in the past, in 000 000m3 of gravels and drift with an average the Braidwood Mining Division, although part of the yield of about 0.125g/m3. Jembaicumbene Creek drainage was covered at A number of shafts showed the gold to be confined times by the Araluen Division. to the bottom and also one or more ‘false bottoms’, The area is dealt with under the sub-section while the average weight of the colours panned Shoalhaven and Jembaicumbene Creek. was 0.000125-0.00025, the largest colour encountered weighing 0.00175g. Alluvial mining In 1900 ground sluicing gave way to dredging and only a little alluvial fossicking has been done since. Escort returns from the banks in Braidwood to the Royal Mint, Sydney between 1858-1874 amounted to 19 596 kilograms (630 088oz). 2. Jembaicumbene This would have been entirely derived from alluvial Fine colours of gold were obtained in 1851 by sources. In addition, alluvial production (excluding Clarke from the Jembaicumbene Swamp. dredging), according to Registrars Returns The majority of the gold, however was obtained between 1875-1920, amounted to 1 019kg (32 from wash layers on the bottom, or on ‘false 757oz).
    [Show full text]
  • Canberra Bushwalking Club Newsletter
    Canberra g o r F e e r o b o r r o Bushwalking C it Club newsletter Canberra Bushwalking Club Inc GPO Box 160 Canberra ACT 2601 Volume: 53 www.canberrabushwalkingclub.org Number: 1 February 2017 GENERAL MEETING 7:30 pm Wednesday 15 February 2017 In this issue 2 Canberra Bushwalking Olympics, Tsylos and Rockwall Club Committee 2 President’s prattle Trail, three hikes in the USA and 2 Positions vacant Canada 3 Walks Waffle 3 Membership matters Presenter: Linda Groom 3 Training Trifles Nine CBC members hiked these areas last August–September; they 3 Bulletin Board encountered stunning alpine scenery, bears, hunters, windfalls, a wild fire 4 Canyons of the Blue and giant mushrooms. Mountains 5 Manuka honey The hall, 5 Alternate walks Hughes Baptist Church, 6 Activity program 6 Wednesday walks 32–34 Groom Street, Hughes 13 Feeling literary? Also some leaders of walks in the current and next month will be on hand with maps to answer your Please note the questions and show you walk routes etc earlier start time of the general meeting, on a trial basis. Important dates 15 February General meeting 29 March Committee meeting 22 February Submissions close for March it Committee reports Canberra Bushwalking Club Committee President’s President: Lorraine Tomlins prattle [email protected] 6248 0456 or 0434 078 496 elcome to a new year of bushwalking and outdoor Treasurer: Julie Anne Clegg Wactivities. I have just returned from a challenging [email protected] 4-day long weekend pack walk to the Tuross Gorge and surrounds. It is a wonderful area and with friendly 0402 118 359 companions and brilliant weather, it was the best of Walks Secretary:John Evans what bushwalking can offer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Murray–Darling Basin Basin Animals and Habitat the Basin Supports a Diverse Range of Plants and the Murray–Darling Basin Is Australia’S Largest Animals
    The Murray–Darling Basin Basin animals and habitat The Basin supports a diverse range of plants and The Murray–Darling Basin is Australia’s largest animals. Over 350 species of birds (35 endangered), and most diverse river system — a place of great 100 species of lizards, 53 frogs and 46 snakes national significance with many important social, have been recorded — many of them found only in economic and environmental values. Australia. The Basin dominates the landscape of eastern At least 34 bird species depend upon wetlands in 1. 2. 6. Australia, covering over one million square the Basin for breeding. The Macquarie Marshes and kilometres — about 14% of the country — Hume Dam at 7% capacity in 2007 (left) and 100% capactiy in 2011 (right) Narran Lakes are vital habitats for colonial nesting including parts of New South Wales, Victoria, waterbirds (including straw-necked ibis, herons, Queensland and South Australia, and all of the cormorants and spoonbills). Sites such as these Australian Capital Territory. Australia’s three A highly variable river system regularly support more than 20,000 waterbirds and, longest rivers — the Darling, the Murray and the when in flood, over 500,000 birds have been seen. Australia is the driest inhabited continent on earth, Murrumbidgee — run through the Basin. Fifteen species of frogs also occur in the Macquarie and despite having one of the world’s largest Marshes, including the striped and ornate burrowing The Basin is best known as ‘Australia’s food catchments, river flows in the Murray–Darling Basin frogs, the waterholding frog and crucifix toad. bowl’, producing around one-third of the are among the lowest in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Pest Management Strategy 2012–17: Blue Mountains Region
    Regional Pest Management Strategy 2012–17: Blue Mountains Region A new approach for reducing impacts on native species and park neighbours © Copyright Office of Environment and Heritage on behalf of State of NSW With the exception of photographs, the Office of Environment and Heritage and State of NSW are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs (OEH copyright). The New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) is part of the Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH). Throughout this strategy, references to NPWS should be taken to mean NPWS carrying out functions on behalf of the Director General of the Department of Premier and Cabinet, and the Minister for the Environment. For further information contact: Blue Mountains Region Metropolitan and Mountains Branch National Parks and Wildlife Service Office of Environment and Heritage Department of Premier and Cabinet PO Box 552 Katoomba NSW 2780 Phone: (02) 4784 7300 Report pollution and environmental incidents Environment Line: 131 555 (NSW only) or [email protected] See also www.environment.nsw.gov.au/pollution. Published by: Office of Environment and Heritage 59–61 Goulburn Street, Sydney, NSW 2000 PO Box A290, Sydney South, NSW 1232 Phone: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Phone: 131 555 (environment information and publications requests) Phone: 1300 361 967 (national parks, climate change and energy efficiency information and publications requests) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au ISBN 978 1 74293 621 5 OEH 2012/0370 August 2013 This plan may be cited as: OEH 2012, Regional Pest Management Strategy 2012–17, Blue Mountains Region: a new approach for reducing impacts on native species and park neighbours, Office of Environment and Heritage, Sydney.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction of Historical Riverine Sediment Production on The
    Anthropocene 21 (2018) 1–15 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Anthropocene journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ancene Reconstruction of historical riverine sediment production on the goldfields of Victoria, Australia a, a b c c Peter Davies *, Susan Lawrence , Jodi Turnbull , Ian Rutherfurd , James Grove , d e f Ewen Silvester , Darren Baldwin , Mark Macklin a Department of Archaeology and History, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, 3086, Australia b Ochre Imprints, 331 Johnston Street, Abbotsford, Victoria, 3067, Australia c School of Geography, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, 22 Bouverie Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3001, Australia d Department of Ecology, Environment and Evolution, School of Life Sciences, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Wodonga, Victoria, Australia e School of Environmental Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Thurgoon, NSW, 2640, Australia f School of Geography & Lincoln Centre for Water and Planetary Health, College of Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, Lincolnshire LN6 7TS, United Kingdom A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: fi fi Received 20 July 2017 A signi cant but previously unquanti ed factor in anthropogenic change in Australian rivers was the release Received in revised form 20 November 2017 of large volumes of sediment produced by gold mining in the 19th century. This material, known historically Accepted 22 November 2017 as ‘sludge’, rapidly entered waterways adjacent to mining areas and caused major environmental damage. Available online 1 December 2017 We interrogate detailed historical records from the colony of Victoria spanning the period 1859 to 1891 to reconstruct the temporal and spatial distribution of sediment volumes released by mining activity.
    [Show full text]