Download Download

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download Download International Business & Economics Research Journal – November/December 2014 Volume 13, Number 6 Crowdfunding To Generate Crowdsourced R&D: The Alternative Paradigm Of Societal Problem Solving Offered By Second Generation Innovation And R&D Chris William Callaghan, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa Abstract In a global context of resource scarcity few incentives exist for firms to pursue innovations that provide social externalities if these are not inherently profitable. The purpose of this article is to present an alternative paradigm of societal problem solving entirely premised on ‘second generation innovation’ processes. Further, a theoretical model of multidimensional, or three dimensional, knowledge creation is offered, together with the notion of a ‘multiplier effect’ that relates to how knowledge creation can increase exponentially when knowledge is not constrained by proprietary requirements. Second generation innovation is based on probabilistic processes that utilize and maximize economies of scale in pursuit of problem solving. Two processes that contribute to the potential of second generation innovation to solve societal problems are crowdfunding and crowdsourcing. It is argued that the processes required to enable a new paradigm in societal problem solving already exist. A further model is developed based on potential synergies between crowdfunding and crowdsourced research and development. This theoretical model predicts that R&D productivity can be accelerated significantly, and if applied in fields such as proteomics or medical research in general can accelerate increases in research output. Keywords: Second Generation Innovation; Crowdsourcing; Crowdfunding; Medical Research; Proteomics INTRODUCTION he world currently faces the prospect of catastrophic events, or disasters in which there is the threat of large-scale loss of human life. One possible example is the advent of a bioevent, or disease outbreak. T In a world now connected by airline travel, this could be in the form of a global epidemic (Maher, 2013), in the form of, amongst others, the newly emerged Middle East Respiratory System Coronavirus (MERS- CoV), Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)(BBC, 2013), or the H7N9 ‘Bird Flu’ virus (Siu, Twinnie & Pomfret, 2013). A research and development (R&D) innovation pipeline, or supply of knowledge that can result in new medicines, is critically important (McKenna, 2014). This innovation pipeline is not only important to solve entirely new and emerging problems, but also for those that have previously been thought to be solved, but are re- emerging. Other examples of this particular threat are the emergence of diseases that decades ago were considered under control. Currently, Ebola has re-emerged in the form of a new epidemic that has broken out in West Africa (Krishnan, 2014). Polio has re-emerged in countries such as Pakistan (Zia, 2014) and Nigeria (Ajumobi, 2014) and fatal forms of tuberculosis have re-emerged in the form new strains of airborne tuberculosis that are now resistant to all forms of antibiotics (Maher, 2013). Increasingly, other forms of fatal bacteria have re-emerged; certain bacteria, or ‘superbugs’, are now totally resistant to, and others are increasingly resistant to, antibiotics (Halifax, 2013). Over two million people are currently infected with antibiotic resistant organisms (McKenna, 2014). Amidst decreasing global production and approvals of new antibiotics, certain commentators have therefore raised concerns that the Copyright by author(s); CC-BY 1499 The Clute Institute International Business & Economics Research Journal – November/December 2014 Volume 13, Number 6 innovation pipeline has slowed, or might be ‘nearly broken’ (McKenna, 2014). This is a dangerous state of affairs as the world might be facing a return to an era where even minor injuries and routine surgery are life-threatening (Halifax, 2013). This article argues that the innovation pipeline is fundamentally unable to deal with challenges because the innovation pipeline is inherently coupled to the dictates of the market mechanism, which disproportionately allocates resources to other ends than those that are required to address global catastrophes. It is argued that market- dictated innovation and research and development (R&D) belongs to a ‘first generation’ paradigm of innovation and R&D. Although the market seems to be astonishingly effective at providing for most human needs, market failure is most prevalent when innovation is required that is not inherently profitable, notwithstanding the positive externalities that may arise later from such investments (Martin & Scott, 2000). It is perhaps only social innovation that has the answers to these challenges, because of its focus on human costs and externalities and not constraints posed by the need for profitability. Until relatively recently, there were few accessible alternatives to profit-oriented innovation for societal problem solving. The advent of information technology, however, has enabled probabilistic systems of problem solving, such as crowdsourcing, that have dramatically decreased the costs involved in knowledge search and knowledge management. Probabilistic systems that use the ‘crowd’ have enabled radically lower cost models of fundraising (in the form of crowdfunding) and knowledge sourcing (in the form of crowdsourcing). “Simply defined, crowdsourcing represents the act of a company or institution taking a function once performed by employees and outsourcing it to an undefined (and generally large) network of people in the form of an open call”, which can take the form of “peer- production (when the job is performed collaboratively), but is also often undertaken by sole individuals” (Howe, 2006, p. 5). Another challenge faced by profit-seeking firms in dealing with large-scale social problems is the scale of investments in innovation and R&D that are required to sufficiently address these; market-generated innovation and R&D is sensitive to scale due to the risks involved under profit constraints. It is therefore argued that ‘first generation’ innovation and R&D cannot sustain the global innovation pipeline that is needed in order to address the challenges discussed above, notwithstanding that these health challenges are but one dimension of the challenges faced by humanity at this point in time. Another challenge faced by first generation finance, or finance that is tethered to the need to generate profitable returns, is that it also does not sufficiently utilise probabilistic mechanisms to generate funds under conditions that are unprofitable. The new ‘second generation’ paradigm of crowd-enabled fundraising, in the form of crowdfunding, has potentially heralded in an age of probabilistically enabled fundraising, enabled by the ‘crowd’. These developments have heightened what appears to be an increasing tension between the emergence of probabilistically-based second generation (SG) systems and the failure of ‘linear’ first generation (FG) systems to deliver social innovations, or innovations with large-scale positive externalities that do not necessarily provide opportunities for profit. RESEARCH OBJECTIVE A fundamental and unresolved tension therefore seems to run through the literatures that relate to academic work in general. On the one hand, over the past decades an explosion in the form of exponential growth in information and knowledge has occurred that has been unmatched in human history (Adair & Vohra, 2003). On the other hand, many problems facing humankind in the form of disease and catastrophic events remain in a state similar to that faced decades ago. In the face of R&D failure associated with first generation R&D (FGR)(Callaghan, 2014a), an alternative is offered in this paper, in the form of second generation innovation (SGI), that is primarily underpinned by second generation R&D (SGR) and second generation fundraising (SGF). The objective of this article is therefore to present what is potentially an alternative paradigm of societal problem solving based entirely on second generation (SG) processes. A theoretical model of multidimensional problem solving, termed Multidirectional, or ‘three dimensional’, knowledge creation in the form of Non-Proprietary Crowdsourced R&D is contrasted with the Copyright by author(s); CC-BY 1500 The Clute Institute International Business & Economics Research Journal – November/December 2014 Volume 13, Number 6 Dyadic, or ‘two dimensional’, knowledge creation process of Proprietary Crowdsourced R&D. The argument is made that the proprietary requirements of knowledge in crowdsourced R&D exist as a boundary condition to theory relating to crowsourcing as a form of innovation. The concept of a ‘multiplier effect’ is also introduced; that relates to exponential increases in knowledge creation that may result from a relaxation of the proprietary requirements of knowledge generation. It is argued that the exponentially increasing global body of information and knowledge requires a transmission mechanism to translate this increase into an equivalent exponential increase in the outputs of social problem solving. An exponentially increasing body of information, it is argued, therefore requires a ‘mechanism’ of information processing for this transmission to social problem solving to fully occur; and that such mechanisms already exist, in the form of probabilistic systems of knowledge management such an crowdsourcing. The paper is structured as follows. First, the alternative paradigm
Recommended publications
  • Entrepreneurial Resources on the Internet 2018
    Entrepreneurial Resources on the Internet 2018 By Marcus P. Zillman, M.S., A.M.H.A. Executive Director – Virtual Private Library [email protected] Entrepreneurial Resources on the Internet 2018 is a comprehensive listing of entrepreneurial resources and sites on the Internet. The below list of sources is taken from my Subject Tracer™ Information Blog titled Entrepreneurial Resources and is constantly updated with Subject Tracer™ bots at the following URL: http://www.EntrepreneurialResources.info/ These resources and sources will help you to discover the many pathways available through the Internet to find the latest entrepreneur resources and sites. As this site is constantly updated it would be to your benefit to bookmark and return to the above URL frequently. Figure 1: Entrepreneurial Resources 2018 Subject Tracer™ Information Blog 1 [Updated November 22, 2017] Entrepreneurial Resources On the Internet 2018 http://www.EntrepreneurialResources.info/ [email protected]/ eVoice: 800-858-1462 © 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 Marcus P. Zillman, M.S., A.M.H.A. Entrepreneurial Resources on the Internet 2018: 100 Search Engines http://www.100SearchEngines.com/ 101 Useful Resources for Online Entrepreneurs http://www.blogtrepreneur.com/2008/03/10/resources-for-online-entrepreneurs/ 101+ Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) Resources for Investigators http://i-sight.com/resources/101-osint-resources-for-investigators/ 123RF Royalty Free Digital Library http://www.123rf.com/ 15Five
    [Show full text]
  • Governs the Making of Photocopies Or Other Reproductions of Copyrighted Materials
    Warning Concerning Copyright Restrictions The Copyright Law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted materials. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research. If electronic transmission of reserve material is used for purposes in excess of what constitutes "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement. 0 University of Nevada, Reno An Investigation Into the Crowdfunding Process for Bringing a Product to Market A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Minor in Entrepreneurship and the Honors Program by Bjorn Talbot Dr. Dave Croasdell, Thesis Advisor April, 2014 1 UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA THE HONORS PROGRAM RENO We recommend that the thesis prepared under our supervision by BJORN TALBOT entitled An Investigation Into the Crowdfunding Process For Bringing A Product To Market be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MINOR IN ENTREPRENEURSHIP ______________________________________________ Dave Croasdell, Ph.D., Thesis Advisor ______________________________________________ Tamara Valentine, Ph. D., Director, Honors Program April, 2014 i Abstract Crowdfunding is a way for entrepreneurs to source capital. It has become a major factor in the funding and marketing landscape and a tool for prospective product based startups. When used effectively crowdfunding can have profound effects on the launch of a company. This paper investigates the process of crowdfunding a product from start to finish, and seeks to establish best methods to use for each step through research and execution.
    [Show full text]
  • Access to Finance the Biggest Challenge in Converting the Intangible Into Tangible
    Access to Finance The Biggest Challenge in Converting The Intangible Into Tangible A report for: NUFFIELD IRELAND Farming Scholarships By Kevin Moran 2015 Nuffield Scholar December 2016 Sponsored by: © 2008 Nuffield Ireland. All rights reserved. This publication has been prepared in good faith on the basis of information available at the date of publication without any independent verification. Nuffield Ireland does not guarantee or warrant the accuracy, reliability, completeness of currency of the information in this publication nor its usefulness in achieving any purpose. Readers are responsible for assessing the relevance and accuracy of the content of this publication. Nuffield Ireland will not be liable for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of any person using or relying on the information in this publication. Products may be identified by proprietary or trade names to help readers identify particular types of products but this is not, and is not intended to be, an endorsement or recommendation of any product or manufacturer referred to. Other products may perform as well or better than those specifically referred to. This publication is copyright. However, Nuffield Ireland encourages wide dissemination of its research, providing the organisation is clearly acknowledged. For any enquiries concerning reproduction or acknowledgement contact the Executive Secretary. Scholar Contact Details: Kevin Moran Killamanagh Caherlistrane Co. Galway Phone: 085 8563967 Email: [email protected] In submitting this report, the Scholar has agreed to Nuffield Ireland publishing this material in its edited form. NUFFIELD IRELAND Contact Details John Tyrrell Executive Secretary, Nuffield Ireland Phone: 00 353 87 256 3501 Email: [email protected] 2 Executive summary To be successful can mean many things.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Sources of Information on External Developing
    This report has been commissioned by the OECD, its contents do not reflect views or OECD or its member countries. Research paper “Mapping of sources and uses of information on external development finance” Presented to the Statistics and Development Finance Division of the OECD Development Cooperation Directorate Consultant: Fernando Prada, FNI researcher (with the support of Fernando Romero and Lucía Málaga) Lima, July 2014 FORO Nacional International (FNI) is a Peruvian think-tank founded in 1992 (http://fni.pe). This paper was produced as part of the ‘Financing for Development’ program at FNI. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 5 2. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND METHODOLOGY FOR MAPPING STATISTICAL DATABASES .............................................................................................................................................................. 7 2.1. CONTEXT OF THE METHODOLOGY AND SEARCH QUERIES .................................................................................... 7 2.2. METHODOLOGY OF BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS: PERSONAS AND SEARCH QUERIES ............................................ 10 3. RESULTS FROM THE BIBLIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS ............................................................................ 12 3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Università Di Pisa
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Archive - Università di Pisa Università di Pisa Dipartimento di Economia e Management Corso di Laurea Specialistica in Management & Controllo Anno Accademico 2012-2013 CROWDFUNDING: INNOVAZIONE, TECNOLOGIA E ASPETTI MANAGERIALI Relatore: Prof. Marco Guidi Candidato: Piero Rosano Indice generale Sommario......................................................................................................5 Capitolo 1......................................................................................................7 Fonti di finanziamento................................................................................. Capitolo 2....................................................................................................21 La Microfinanza.......................................................................................... Capitolo 3....................................................................................................34 Il web 2.0 .................................................................................................... Capitolo 4....................................................................................................45 Il crowdsourcing.......................................................................................... Capitolo 5....................................................................................................52 Crowdfunding.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Crowdfunding
    JOBS (Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act) Really it started with PBR Story February 2010 $200 million from 5 million beer fans S E C No accredited investors Laws prohibited regular investor in this type of deal Foundation of Crowdfunding No beer was harmed during this campaign November(ish) 2009 - Michael Migliozzi and Brian Flatow www.buyabeercompany.com “Crowdsourcing” $300 million Compensation for investor? “Crowdsourced Certificate of Ownership” Beer equal to the amount pledged ACT OF CONGRESS Startup Exemption Team Startup Exemption Framework Story WSJ JOBS Act Crowdfunding Describes multiple different funding relationships between individuals and organizations connected via the Internet. Token crowdfunding Raising NON-EQUITY capital in exchange for “tokens” Crowdfund investing Section 4(6) of the JOBS Act Provides exemption from registration SEC registered crowdfunding platform * Regulation D crowdfunding Equity and debt capital by private companies Rule 506 of Regulation D (amended by the JOBS Act) Rule 506 Crowdfunding Compare the Bills Seed round funding Term Sheet Series A funding Offering Memorandum Venture Capitalists Equity Security Private Equity Funds Debt Security Angel Investor Revenue-based Security Private Share Issuance limit $1 million in any 12 month period Facilitation Small investments by many people Annual income / Net Worth restrictions Time restrictions CrowdFunding Initiative (CFI) Lowers the failure rate of small businesses Augments and supports capital formation
    [Show full text]
  • Boskone 51 Pocket Program
    BOSKONE 51 image © David Palumbo image © David POCKET PROGRAM February 14–16, 2014 • bostoN • WestiN WaterFroNt CONTENTS 1 Convention Hours page 2 Event and Activity Locations page 3 Gaming Rules page 4 Gaming Schedule page 5 Friday Program Schedule page 6 Saturday Program Schedule page 13 Sunday Program Schedule page 30 Program Schedule Grids page 40 Hotel Maps back cover Boskone® and NESFA® are registered trademarks of the New England Science Fiction Association, Inc. 2 CONVentION HOURS FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY Registration 3 – 8:30pm 9am – 6pm 9am – noon Alcott Room, Mezzanine Art Show 6pm – midnight 10am – 9pm 10am – noon Galleria (closeout at noon) Art Show Quick Sale - noon – 9pm 10am – noon Art Show Sales - - 1pm – 3pm Con Suite 4pm – 1am 10am – 1am 10am – 4pm Galleria Filking 4pm – midnight 10am – midnight 10am – 4pm Mezzanine (Douglass - sleeping room side) Gaming 5pm – midnight 10am – midnight 10am – 3pm 2nd floor, Harbor Pre-function Hucksters Room 5pm – 8pm 10am – 6pm 10am – 3pm Galleria Information/Volunteers 3pm – 9pm 10am – 9pm 10am – 3pm Galleria Program 4 pm – midnight 10am – midnight 10am – 4 pm 2nd floor, Galleria DragonsLair— 6pm – 9pm 9am – noon 9am – 2pm Kids Activities 1pm – 5pm Galleria 7pm – 9pm Dead Dog Party - - after teardown Galleria LocATIons 3 see maps on back cover EVent LocATIons Art Show Opening (Fri night) Galleria Boskone Reception & Meet the Guests (Fri night) Book Launch Party (Sat night) Dead Dog (Sun) Awards Ceremonies (Sat night) 2nd floor rooms Filk Fest (Sat night) Play Reading (Sat night) ActIVITY LocATIons Filking (evenings) 2nd floor Mezzanine Newsletter Distribution Point Registration Main Programming 2nd floor function rooms Art Demos Gaming 2nd floor pre-function area Newsletter Distribution Point Fan tables (lower levels, not 1st floor) escalator lobbies Art Show and Art Show Sales Galleria Autographing Con Suite Hucksters’ Room Discussion Groups DragonsLair Information ABOUT KAFFEEKLATCHES Kaffeeklatches • Kaffeeklatch seating is Newsletter Distribution Point — Information Desk limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowdfunding As an Alternative Source of Support for Entrepreneurial Initiatives
    Crowdfunding as an Alternative Source of Support for Entrepreneurial Initiatives Crowdfunding as an Alternative Source of Support for Entrepreneurial Initiatives Assist. Prof. Ivaylo Petrov Faculty of Management and Marketing ’Dimitar A. Tsenov’ Academy of Economics - Svishtov E-mail: [email protected] Груповото финансиране като алтернативен източник на подкрепа за предприемачески инициативи Ас. Ивайло Петров Факултет „Мениджмънт и маркетинг” Стопанска академия „Димитър А. Ценов“ – Свищов E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: New technologies allow global access to customers and markets not only to large enterprises, but also to anyone who has a good idea and manages to find the right approach for its implementation. The main problem in starting a new business venture is the provision of financial resources. In the second decade of the XXI century, a new form of financing gradually gained widespread response – the crowdfunding. Key words: crowdfunding, entrepreneurship, innovations, start-ups Резюме: Новите технологии позволяват глобален достъп до клиенти и пазари както на големите предприятия, така и на всеки, който има добра идея и правилен подход за нейната реализация. Основният проблем пред стартиране на ново бизнес начинание е осигуряването на финансовите средства. През второто десетилетие на XXI век една нова форма на финансиране постепенно придобива широко разпространение и отзвук – т. нар. групово финансиране. Ключови думи: краудфъндинг, предприемачество, иновации, начинаещ бизнес JEL Classification: G21, G24, L26, L31, M13 І. Introduction І. Въведение The development of Web 2.0 technolo- Развитието на Web 2.0 технологиите през gies in recent years allow people with последните години даде възможност на fresh ideas to seek new ways to achieve хората с идеи да потърсят нови начи- them.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Careers Reached Report No Criticism from Their Institutions Or Peers
    http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org Career Advice Asking the Public for Money Postdoctoral research fellow David Kipping has often seen other astronomers don smart jackets when attending meetings “Because [crowd-funding] is or giving presentations, especially when they knew that funding small projects, it’s got its CREDIT: Microsoft Office.com funding powers-that-be would own niche.” —David Kipping also be there. So before heading to one of his science presentations last year, Kipping pulled on a smart jacket. His next moves, however, were less conventional. He climbed the stairs to the roof of the Perkins building at the Harvard- Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/) , pointed his laptop’s video camera at himself and, with the center’s 9-inch Clark telescope dome in the background, made a science sales pitch directly to the public. The video (http://www.petridish.org/projects/help-us-find-the-first-exomoon) , which appears on YouTube and on the science crowd- funding Web site Petridish.org (http://www.petridish.org/) , raised $12,247. The pitch was to buy and install a small supercomputer, which he would name for the biggest donor, to speed up data processing on a search for moons in other solar systems. Direct public funding of science in return for recognition is nothing new: A century ago Antarctic explorer Ernest Shackleton named dogs on one of his expeditions for the British schools that helped pay for it. He also named a lifeboat for his biggest donor. Today's online platforms like Petridish.org, however, may be more efficient than Shackleton's fundraising, which took him 2 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowdfunding for Sanitation
    Crowdfunding for Sanitation Overview CEPT University With support from Dalberg Global Development Advisors Executive Summary (1/4) Background • Our previous work in Maharashtra highlighted significant gaps in the sanitation value chain in the towns of Wai and Sinnar. Specifically, access to “own toilets1” and treatment of septage remains a challenge in both the towns • Furthermore, existing funding under government schemes is unlikely to meet investment requirements to achieve universal sanitation • There is high need for external financing support to improve access to sanitation services in these two towns – ~INR 72.8 M is required to provide 100% coverage of toilets at the households, ~INR 33.6 M to provide toilets in schools, and ~INR 7.3 M required to build Sludge Drying Beds (SDBs) to treat 100% household waste • Various financing sources could be leveraged to support these projects - crowdfunding is an emerging tool in development sector financing, and could play a catalytic role in generating financial support for these households. Going forward, this project could also help create awareness on the issues of urban sanitation in the broader community • The primary objective of this study is to assess crowdfunding as a financing option for sanitation needs in Wai and Sinnar About crowdfunding • The global crowdfunding industry is expected to raise ~USD 34.5 B in 2015, with the Asian market being the fastest growing geography. Within India, the crowdfunding space is still at a nascent stage, and will raise an estimated ~USD 5- 12 M in 2015, with social causes comprising ~30% - 40% of crowdfunding contributions • A crowdfunding campaign involves a central crowdfunding platform, a primary organizing agency, and a field partner.
    [Show full text]
  • Università Degli Studi Di Modena E Reggio Emilia
    Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia Dipartimento di Comunicazione ed Economia Corso di Laurea in Pubblicità, Editoria e Creatività d'Impresa A.A. 2012/2013 INDAGINE SULLE PROBLEMATICHE E LE PROSPETTIVE DI SVILUPPO DEL CROWDFUNDING COME STRUMENTO DI FINANZIAMENTO PER IL COMMERCIO EQUO E SOLIDALE Relatore: Prof. Piergiorgio Degli Esposti Laureando: Filippo Alestra Matr. 56733 INDICE INTRODUZIONE........................................................................... 1 CAPITOLO 1 QUADRO TEORICO: IL WEB 2.0, I SUOI CONCETTI, LE SUE TEORIE........................................................................................................ 5 1.1 IL WEB 2.0............................................................................................... 5 1.2 CONCETTI E TEORIE DEL WEB 2.0.................................................... 9 1.2.1 Open Culture........................................................................................................... 10 1.2.2 Intelligenza collettiva e saggezza della folla........................................................... 15 1.2.3 Prosumerismo.......................................................................................................... 22 1.2.4 La coda lunga.......................................................................................................... 25 1.3 I FENOMENI DEL WEB 2.0................................................................... 29 1.3.1 Google e lo scontro di piattaforme.........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Identify Their Preferences for Purchasing Goods Over the Internet. Age
    identify their preferences for purchasing goods over the Internet. Age range of interviewed people was from 17 years old to more than 50 years old (groups of less than 17, 18-24, 25-29, 30-35, 36- 44, 45-50, and more than 50 years old). 69% of interviewed were from EMEA countries, 21% from North America, 8% from Asia and 2% from South America. People who gave more answers (25,86%) were from 36 to 44 years old (see chart 1). 45 - 50; ≤ 50; 8,62% 18 - 24; 5,17% 15,52% 25 - 29; 36 - 44; 20,69% 25,86% 30 - 35; 24,14% Chart 1. Age range of interviewed people The group of people from 36 to 44 years old in this survey were seen as most active respondents and active Internet users, as well as active online consumers. 80% of them started using Internet more than 10 years ago and 66,67% of them usually access Internet via personal computer and mobile phone. More than half of them (53,33%) spend online more than 3 hours per day – 27,45% of which visit social networks, 25,49% – Web search platforms as Google and Yahoo, and 21,57% spend time in online shops. 80% of respondents in age range 36–40 started buying online more than 5 years ago, 40% of which usually buy online once per month. 48,15% got the information about the last product or service they bought online via online shop where purchase was made. The main benefits of shopping online were seen next: 18,97% buy online because of time saving; 15,52% search for discounts, sales, special propositions and for ability to buy 24 hours per day using different devices with Internet access.
    [Show full text]