DOCSLIB.ORG

Standardized Service Layering for Iot in Onem2m

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Standardized Service Layering for Iot in Onem2m Standardized Service Layering for IoT in oneM2M ETSI M2M Workshop, Sophia‐Antipolis, Dec. 2015 Nicolas Damour, [email protected] Senior Manager for Business & Innovation at Sierra Wireless Chairman of the Architecture Working Group at oneM2M © 2015 oneM2M 1 Connected Pancakes –1/3 “Thing” “Thing” Communication Communication Unit Unit Data Processing Data Processing & Communication & Communication Application Application Network © 2015 oneM2M Connected Pancakes –2/3 “Thing” “Thing” Communication Communication Unit Unit Data Processing Data Processing Part Part Data Communication Data Communication Part Part Network © 2015 oneM2M Connected Pancakes –3/3 “Thing” “Thing” Communication Communication Unit Unit Data Processing Data Processing Part Part Common Services Common Services Part Part Data Communication Data Communication Part Part Network © 2015 oneM2M oneM2M Pancakes “Thing” “Thing” Communication Communication Unit Unit Data Processing Data Processing Part Part Common Services Common Services oneM2M Part Part Data Communication Data Communication Part Part Network © 2015 oneM2M oneM2M Architecture Node (Host) Logical equivalent of a physical (or possibly virtualized) device Common Services Entity (Service Layer) Provides the set of "service functions" common to the M2M environments Application Entity (Application) Provides application logic for the end‐to‐end M2M solutions Reference Point (Interface) One or more interfaces ‐ Mca, Mcn, Mcc and Mcc’ (between 2 service providers) Network Services Entity (Modem) Provides connectivity services to the CSEs besides the pure data transport Application Layer AE AE Mca Mca Service Layer CSE CSE Mcn Mcc Mcn Network Underlying Layer NSE Network NSE Device IoT Cloud Platform (“Application Service Node”) (“Infrastructure Node”) © 2015 oneM2M oneM2M Functions Group Registration Discovery Security Management Data Application & Subscription & Device Management & Service Notification Management Repository Management Communication Network Service Service Charging Location Management Exposure & Accounting © 2015 oneM2M Importance of standards • Reduced deployment and operation costs • Cost‐effective products thanks to focused R&D efforts • Easier application development • Easier integration between solution components • Ability to share and reuse infrastructure and field devices • Sustainable investments • No vendor lock‐in • Ability to benefit from further evolutions of the standard as it grows • Improved opportunities • Ability to share and reuse data across vertical applications • Ability to interconnect with other IoT/M2M systems • Fostering of new applications and new business models © 2015 oneM2M oneM2M partnership Partnership project between 14 partners created in 2012 to specify and promote a standard for an IoT/M2M Common Service Layer Over 200 active member organizations © 2015 oneM2M 9 oneM2M organization SC ‐ STEERING COMMITTEE Chairman: Fran O’Brien, Cisco Vice‐chairs: E. Scarrone, Telecom Italia ‐ P. Jain, Intel ‐ T. Li, Huawei Finance Committee Marketing & Communication Committee Legal Committee Methods & Processes Committee TP ‐ TECHNICAL PLENARY Chairman: Omar Elloumi, Alcatel‐Lucent Vice‐chairs: R. Hechwartner, Deutsche Telekom; N. Yamasaki, KDDI; K. Young Kim, LG Electronics Work Programme Management Group Coordination Team Methods of Work Group WG1 –REQ WG2 –ARC WG3 –PRO WG4 –SEC WG5 –MAS WG6 –TST Requirements Architecture Protocols Security Mgt Abst. & Sem. Test S. Kiewel (iconectiv) N. Damour (Sierra W.) P. Niblett (IBM) F. Ennesser (Gemalto) Y. Zhang (Huawei) J. Song (KETI) © 2015 oneM2M 10 Purpose, Work & Deliverables Purpose To specify and promote a Standard for an M2M/IoT Common Service Layer Work Six physical 1‐week meetings per year with ~100 attendees 200+ documents produced and discussed at each meeting 3800 docs in 2013 4400 docs in 2014 Deliverables Technical Reports (TRs) and Technical Specifications (TSs) Release 1 published in January 2015 –10 TSs + 5 TRs Release 2 planned for mid‐2016 © 2015 oneM2M 11 oneM2M implementations Open source implementations IotDM Commercial implementations available and demos COME AND SEE THE DEMOS © 2015 oneM2M Mature and active standard • Work started in 2012, leveraging 3+ years of experience • 3800 docs produced in 2013, 4400 docs in 2014… • Release 1 published in Jan 2015 • 16 specifications published so far • More than 40 specifications in the works • Hundreds of documents produced every month • Corrections to release 1 actively maintained • Release 2 with new features planned for 2016 © 2015 oneM2M Interoperable standard Guidelines active collaborations MQTT uses interworks with uses interworks with OMADM LWM2M interworks with uses HTTP CoAP TLS DTLS Protocols Full platforms © 2015 oneM2M Interoperable standard Example implementation by KETI AllJoyn Google Nest oneM2M oneM2M Interworking Interworking onePass Proxy Proxy App (for AllJoyn) (for Nest) Powertech Smart Plug Pebble Open oneM2M oneM2M API Service Entity Service Entity AllJoyn(MN-CSE) (IN-CSE)Nest Dawon DNS Smart Plug oneM2M oneM2M oneM2M Jawbone Hue Service Entity Service Entity Open (IN-CSE) (IN-CSE) Open API API OIC onePass oneM2M oneM2M onePass App Interworking Interworking App Proxy Proxy (for Jawbone) (for Hue) Jawbone U24 Philips Hue ConnecThing App © 2015 oneM2M oneM2M Work Programme Release 1 (publ. Jan. 2015) Release 2 (target ~mid. 2016) • WI‐01 ‐ Requirements • WI‐15 ‐ Use Cases v2 • WI‐02 ‐ Architecture • WI‐16 ‐ E2E Security & Groups • WI‐03 ‐ Vocabulary • WI‐17 ‐ Home Domain Enablement • WI‐04 ‐ Study of Managt Capability • WI‐18 ‐ oneM2M & AllJoyn IWK • WI‐05 ‐ Abstraction & Semantics • WI‐19 ‐ Dynamic Authorization • WI‐06 ‐ Device/GW Classification • … • WI‐07 ‐ Security • WI‐24 ‐ LWM2M Interworking • WI‐08 ‐ Protocol Analysis • WI‐25 ‐ Area Ntwks Gen. Interwrkg • WI‐09 ‐ Protocols • WI‐26 ‐ Efficient Communications • WI‐10 ‐ Management Enablement • WI‐27 ‐ Testing Framework • WI‐11 ‐ Service Components Arch. • WI‐28 ‐ Industrial Domain Enablnt • WI‐12 ‐ RESTful COAP Protocol • … • WI‐13 ‐ RESTful HTTP Protocol • WI‐43 ‐ Contin. of HGI Smart Home • WI‐14 ‐ MQTT Protocol • WI‐44 ‐ oneM2M & OIC IWK © 2015 oneM2M 16 Collaborative Mindset • Collaborative mindset within oneM2M • Partnership Project from the start • Strong focus on reusing existing technologies wherever possible • Strong consideration for user industries • Collaborative mindset with external organizations • Personal Connected Health Alliance – Continua • Home Gateway Initiative • AllSeen Alliance • Open Interconnect Consortium • European Smart Metering Industry Group • IEEE P2413 • ITU‐T SG20 • W3C • Industrial Internet Consortium??? © 2015 oneM2M 17 Work Process Energy Enterprise Healthcare Public Services Residential Other Transportation Industry REQUIREMENTS TS‐0002 TECHNICAL REPORTS TECHNICAL SPECS © 2015 oneM2M 18 Rel. 1 Technical Reports Architecture Use Architecture Analysis 1 Cases Analysis 2 TR‐0002 TR‐0001 TR‐0003 (WI‐0002) (WI‐0001) (WI‐0002) Protocol Study of Mgt Abstraction & Security Analysis Capab. Enablnt Semantics Analysis TR‐0009 TR‐0006 TR‐0007 TR‐0008 (WI‐0008) (WI‐0004) (WI‐0005) (WI‐0007) Roles & Use E2E Security & Focus Areas Cases v2 Group Authent. TR‐0005 TR‐0011 TR‐0012 (WI‐0003) (WI‐0014) (WI‐0011) (Now 82 Tech. Reports under way for Rel. 2 as of Sept. 2015) © 2015 oneM2M 19 Rel. 1 Technical Specifications Requirements Functional Definitions Service Layer Architecture & Acronyms Core Protocols TS‐0002 TS‐0001 TS‐0011 TS‐0004 (WI‐0001) (WI‐0002) (WI‐0003) (WI‐0009) HTTP Protocol CoAP Protocol Management Management Binding Binding Enablnt ‐ OMA Enablnt ‐ BBF TS‐0009 TS‐0008 TS‐0005 TS‐0006 (WI‐0013) (WI‐0012) (WI‐0010) (WI‐0010) MQTT Protocol Security Binding Solutions TS‐0010 TS‐0003 (WI‐0014) (WI‐0007) (Now 32 Tech. Specifications under way for Rel. 2 as of Sept. 2015) © 2015 oneM2M 20 oneM2M Release 2 features Home domain Industrial domain enablement (at least 1 enablement (at least 1 normative feature) normative feature) • Home appliance • Time series, etc. information models • In conjunction with the TR APP identifiers and registry services oneM2M Semantic interoperability beyond • base ontology initial release • semantic discovery • semantic descriptions oneM2M interworking framework • Generic interworking • AllJoyn/AllSeen and/or Advanced protocol binding Security • OIC and/or • WebSocket (?) • Enhancement for • OMA LightWeight • Efficient content authorization M2M (OMA LWM2M) representations (?) • privacy support •3GPP Rel.13 • e2e security (?) Interworking © 2015 oneM2M 21 Still hungry? © 2015 oneM2M 22.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Woo Project Overview
    WoO Approach General Overview WF-IoT 2014 Mihaela Brut, Patrick Gatellier Thales Services, France Ilyoung Chong, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Korea 6th Of March 2014 2 / 01: Scientific and Business Context Scientific and Business Context 3 / Context – IoT and WoT gather more and more devices IoT boom: u Since 2007: more devices than people are connected to Internet (Cisco IoT IBSG, 2011) u In 2020: 50 billions devices will be connected to Internet (Ericson, 2010) u In 2020: the global M2M business (large industry, solution providers, connectivity providers) will reach 260 milliards Euros (Machina Research, 2012); u By 2020: IoT will add $1,9 trillion to the global economy (Gartner, 2013) => huge business application development (WoT & Future Internet boom) People connected to Internet resulted in Web 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 … applications What can we imagine about the future of the connected devices? 4 / Context – status of IoT and WoT business Huge deployment of smart devices and sensors, resulting in huge amount of data collected, not exploited in real-time, nor outside a closed system: u Smart metering => filtered data is selected for billing purposes, and various statistic analysis are accomplished £ If a third party (e.g. insurance company) is interested in specific data, no legal framework and no technical support u Smart homes: each equipment is able to switch in secure mode, and to send information or alarm messages, eventually to receive remote control commands £ France: government investment in “sensing” the elder people homes
    [Show full text]
  • Hypermedia Apis for Sensor Data: a Pragmatic Approach to the Web of Things
    Hypermedia APIs for Sensor Data: A pragmatic approach to the Web of Things The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Russell, Spencer, and Joseph Paradiso. “Hypermedia APIs for Sensor Data: A Pragmatic Approach to the Web of Things.” Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services (2014). As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/icst.mobiquitous.2014.258072 Publisher European Union Digital Library/ICST Version Author's final manuscript Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103763 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Hypermedia APIs for Sensor Data A pragmatic approach to the Web of Things Spencer Russell Joseph A. Paradiso [email protected] [email protected] Responsive Environments Group MIT Media Lab Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA, USA ABSTRACT dards and protocols such as AllJoyn1 and MQTT2, other As our world becomes more instrumented, sensors are ap- projects [20] seek to use existing application-level Web stan- pearing in our homes, cars, and on our bodies [12]. These dards such as HTTP to provide an interface that is more sensors are connected to a diverse set of systems and pro- familiar to developers, and also that can take advantage of tocols driven by cost, power, bandwidth, and more. De- tooling and infrastructure already in place for the World spite this heterogeneous infrastructure, we need to be able Wide Web. These efforts are often dubbed the Web of to build applications that use that data, and the most value Things, which reflects the relationships to existing Web stan- comes from integrating these disparate sources together.
    [Show full text]
  • At&T Interstate Access Guidebook
    AT&T, the Globe Logo, and all product names referenced herein are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property or one of its affiliates, and are used with permission. PART 1 - Preface 4th Revised Page 1 SECTION 1 - Title Page and Legal Notice AT&T INTERSTATE ACCESS GUIDEBOOK Regulations, Rates and Charges applying to the provision of Access Services within a Local Access and Transport Area (LATA) or equivalent Market Area and for the provision of InterLATA services for connection to interstate communications facilities for Customers of the (C) Issuing Carriers as provided herein: Legal Names of Issuing Carriers Companies of the Ameritech Operating Companies: Illinois Bell Telephone Company Indiana Bell Telephone Company Michigan Bell Telephone Company The Ohio Bell Telephone Company Wisconsin Bell, Inc. BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC Nevada Bell Telephone Company Pacific Bell Telephone Company The Southern New England Telephone Company Southwestern Bell Telephone Company ATT TN IS-12-0025 EFFECTIVE: AUGUST 18, 2012 AT&T INTERSTATE ACCESS GUIDEBOOK PART 1 - Preface Original Sheet 2 SECTION 1 - Title Page and Legal Notice LEGAL NOTICE The AT&T Interstate Access Guidebook (“Guidebook”), which is part of the AT&T Interstate Guidebook, applies to the AT&T Broadband Services that are subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”). Broadband Services, as described in this document, are special access services for which tariffs are subject to withdrawal pursuant to FCC Memorandum Opinion and Order No. FCC 07-180 released October 12, 2007. The Broadband Services described in the Guidebook are common carrier services under Title II of the Telecommunications Act, as applicable to non-dominant carriers.
    [Show full text]
  • WELCOME to the WORLD of ETSI an Overview of the European Telecommunication Standards Institute
    WELCOME TO THE WORLD OF ETSI An overview of the European Telecommunication Standards Institute © ETSI 2016. All rights reserved © ETSI 2016. All rights reserved European roots, global outreach ETSI is a world-leading standards developing organization for Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Founded initially to serve European needs, ETSI has become highly- respected as a producer of technical standards for worldwide use © ETSI 2016. All rights reserved Products & services Technical specifications and standards with global application Support to industry and European regulation Specification & testing methodologies Interoperability testing © ETSI 2016. All rights reserved Membership Over 800 companies, big and small, from 66 countries on 5 continents Manufacturers, network operators, service and content providers, national administrations, ministries, universities, research bodies, consultancies, user organizations A powerful and dynamic mix of skills, resources and ambitions © ETSI 2016. All rights reserved Independence Independent of all other organizations and structures Respected for neutrality and trustworthiness Esteemed for our world-leading Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Policy © ETSI 2016. All rights reserved Collaboration Strategic collaboration with numerous global and regional standards-making organizations and industry groupings Formally recognized as a European Standards Organization, with a global perspective Contributing technical standards to support regulation Defining radio frequency requirements for
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Homes and the New White Futurism
    Journal of Futures Studies 2021,Vol. 25(4) 45–56 DOI: 10.6531/JFS.202106_25(4).0004 Article Smart Homes and the New White Futurism Adam Richard Rottinghaus1,* 1Assistant Professor of Media, Journalism & Film, Miami University, Williams Hall, 208, 350 Oak Ave., Oxford, OH, 45056, USA Abstract This article explores the consumer technology industry’s discourse about emerging Internet of Things smart home devices and sketches an outline of a “new white futurism.” New white futurism displaces prior consumer fantasies of labor-free living in smart homes and frames emerging smart home devices as tools for data-driven management of work/life balance in contemporary heteronormative, white, middle-class culture. The research draws on existing scholarly literature, archival documents, contemporary marketing discourses, and participant observation at CES in 2014 and 2018. The article concludes that it is crucial to reimagine cultural relationships to emerging technologies through Afro, Indigenous, and queer futuristic thought. Keywords Smart Homes, Emerging Technologies, Internet of Things, Futurism, Labor, Corporate Power This article explores the consumer technology industry’s discourse about emerging smart home devices and begins sketching the outlines of a “new white futurism.” New white futurism is a discourse from companies that promotes emerging smart home technologies as tools for data-driven management of work/life balance in contemporary heteronormative, white, middle-class culture. Since 2008 the consumer technology industry has increasingly focused on the Internet of Things (IoT) and connected smart homes as the dominant retail application. IoT smart home devices have precipitated a shift away from promoting imaginative technological futures that bring about changes in labor or culture in everyday life toward one of logistics and management that reproduce the status quo.
    [Show full text]
  • Better Life with Smart Media & Things
    Better Life with Smart media & things Innopia Technologies Inc. Why Smart Media Gateway for IoT Service? 1 Interactive media consumption with IoT devices 2 More effective information on TV interface 3 Always connected gateway at living room AllSeen Alliance Ecosystem LG AT&T Panasonic Microsoft Vodafone Technicolor Qualcomm Century Link Philips ADT Sony LGU+ Canon Haier Solution Service Operators CE Manufacturer Why Innopia for AllJoyn Solution? Specialty of Embedded Design House SW for Linux & Android experiences with platform various SoC Guaranteed Inter- Make media as one of operability with strong IoT smart home service expertise in HW & SW Innopia Advantages Innopia AllJoyn enabled product roadmap 1. AllJoyn 3. AllJoyn notification, 5. AllJoyn support Wi-Fi notification enabled control panel enabled Smart radar tracer for Smart TV wireless TV the multiple movement enablement stick streaming projector and presence monitoring MP CS CS Dev. Plan. 2. Smart home package 4. Multi-protocol including Wi-Fi power support smart media plug, Wi-Fi LED bulb and GW based on own GW stick based on AllJoyn bridge system AllJoyn framework for for AllJoyn control panel home automation, energy management with media entertainment Now Launching Launching Launching Launching available Q3, 2015 Q3, 2015 Q4, 2015 Q2, 2016 Smart Home Starter Package Wi-Fi Smart LED MagicCast Wi-Fi Smart Light Bulb - AllJoyn Gateway Power Plug Smart Media Service Use Cases 1 Interactive game with LED bulb 2 Home theater experience from media mode Smart Media Service Use Cases
    [Show full text]
  • Issued: October 1, 2007 Effective: October 11, 2007 BY
    WIRELESS CARRIER INTERCONNECTION SERVICE TARIFF 8th Revised Sheet 1 Replacing 7th Revised Sheet 1 INDEX WIRELESS CARRIER INTERCONNECTION SERVICE Sheet GENERAL 1 DEFINITIONS 1 GENERAL REGULATIONS 3 (CT) Liability of the Company 3 Obligations of the Carrier 4 Payments, Deposits and Termination of Service 5 Directory Listings 7 Directory Assistance 7 Directory Assistance Call Completion 7 Operator Service 8 Special Construction 8 Radio Transmitter Links 8 Special Service Arrangements 8 Telephone Numbers 8 Wireless Carrier Provided Facilities 9 Telecommunications Service Priority System 9A Additional Engineering and Labor 9A Assignment and Transfer of Facilities 9A DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE 10 FEATURES 13 Optional Features - Nonchargeable 13 Optional Features - Chargeable 14 RATE REGULATIONS 14 Originating Connecting Circuits - Type 1 and Type 2A 14A Terminating Connecting Circuits - Type 1 and Type 2A 15 Area Wide Calling Plan Connecting Circuits 16B Nonrecurring Charges - Type 1 and Type 2A 17 Minimum Monthly Charges - Type 1 and Type 2A 17 Type 2B Service 17 Common Channel Signaling/Signaling System Seven (CCS/SS7) 18A RATES AND CHARGES 19 Vacant 19 Area Wide Calling Plan Usage Rate Elements 19A Directory Assistance Services 19A Directory Assistance Call Completion 19A Telephone Number Groups and Dedicated NXX Charges 21 Nonrecurring Charges 22 WIRELESS 911 CONNECTION CIRCUIT SERVICE 24 Issued: October 1, 2007 Effective: October 11, 2007 BY: MICHAEL R. SCOTT, President-Kansas Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Topeka, Kansas WIRELESS CARRIER INTERCONNECTION SERVICE TARIFF Original Sheet 2 TRADEMARKS AND SERVICE MARKS (AT) Telcordia® and Common Language® are registered trademarks and iconectiv, CLCI, CLEI, CLFI, CLLI, USOC, FID, NC, NCI and NC/NCI, are trademarks of Telcordia Technologies, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Certified Caller ID
    market brief certified caller ID The impact of robocalling and Academic researchers and leading telecom associations such as the Internet Engineering spoofing Task Force (IETF) and the Alliance for With the rise of telemarketing and other unwanted Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS) have calls, Caller ID can serve a useful purpose in alerting been working on solutions to help the industry consumers to the number that is calling on their mitigate spoofing. phone’s display. If you recognize the number, you Together with industry leaders such as iconectiv, an can answer. If you don’t recognize the number, you authoritative partner of the communications industry can decide whether to answer or not. However, for more than 30 years, IETF and ATIS developed that decision is taken out of your hands if someone the SHAKEN (Signature-based Handling of Asserted has manipulated the Caller ID to look like a familiar information using toKENs) standard that provides a number or one with a local area code. framework for service providers to implement new Known as ‘spoofing,’ the technique can also mislead certificate-based anti-spoofing measures. people by displaying a text string such as “Free Money,” or provide an 800 number that cannot be multi-key verification traced to the originating call center. The problem breakthrough has been severely compounded in recent years by Developed as an ATIS/SIP Forum standard, SHAKEN the use of computerized auto-dialers to deliver pre- provides an industry framework for managing the recorded messages, otherwise known as robocalls, deployment of Secure Telephone Identity (STI) which has become the No.
    [Show full text]
  • C C Communications Claims Allowed by the Board of County Commissioners at Their Regular Meetings for the Months of July Thru September 2019
    C C Communications Claims allowed by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular meetings for the months of July thru September 2019 Supplies & Services ADAMS CABLE EQUIPMENT INC 5,695.85 ADI 13,081.87 ADOBE MAX 2019 1,790.00 ADVANCED MEDIA TECHNOLO 1,786.69 AFLAC 4,869.81 AIR FILTER SALES & SERVICE 260.72 ALLISON, MACKENZIE,PAVLAKIS, WRIGHT 1,848.08 ALLSTREAM 157.29 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES- NET 30 11,256.04 AMERICAN CAR WASH 10.00 AMERICAN DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION 129.00 AMERIGAS 536.00 ANAYA, KRISTI 140.00 ANIXTER, INC 51.24 ANPI, LLC - NS 16,316.84 APPLE COMPUTER, INC. 2,098.00 ARIN 2,000.00 AT&T 3,224.32 AUDIO ON HOLD LTD 212.00 BALLARD, DAWN 64.98 BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY 1,000.00 BROADCASTERS GENERAL STORE INC 4,092.00 BROWN, PATRICIA 435.00 BSG TPV, LLC 302.10 C BAR R 1,107.02 CABLE TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC 441.50 CALIX INC 314,721.12 CAMILON, MELESSA 2,237.00 CBS SPORTS NETWORK 1,886.92 CC COMMUNICATIONS 8.10 CCHS CHEER 110.00 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC 2,279.09 CEDA BUSINESS COUNCIL 430.00 CHRISTENSEN AUTOMOTIVE OF FALLON 418.08 CHURCHILL AREA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION 2,500.00 CHURCHILL ARTS COUNCIL 1,800.00 CHURCHILL COUNTY CLERK/TRES. 624,999.99 CHURCHILL COUNTY COMPTROLLER 8,655.41 CHURCHILL COUNTY COMPTROLLER FUEL 11,523.47 CHURCHILL COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 121,587.14 CHURCHILL COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 11,514.87 CHURCHILL COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES 100.00 CHURCHILL COUNTY TREASURER 4,563.51 CIGNA HEALTH & LIFE INSURANCE 126,075.79 CIGNA-LINA 6,500.37 CITY OF FALLON/ CITY CLERK 15,446.25 CLEARFIELD, INC 14,371.55 COALITION FOR WILLIAM N PENNINGTON LIFE 2,500.00 CODALE ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC 12,485.57 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC 6,075.00 COMCAST SPORTSNET BAY AREA 20,492.64 COMMSOFT 13,918.50 COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA 1,351.38 COMSTOCK TELECOM 16,364.96 CONNECTWISE, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • François Ambrosini, IBIT François Ambrosini Obtained His Engineering Degree in Electronics and Signal Processing Combined
    François Ambrosini, IBIT François Ambrosini obtained his engineering degree in electronics and signal processing combined with a master's degree in computer networks and telecommunications from ENSEEIHT, Toulouse, France, in 2003. Among other activities he was involved with radio tech‐ nology development at Sagem Défence & Sécurité and later in the standardisation of mobile TV systems at Motorola. Mr. Ambrosini operates an office for consulting in information technology and telecommunication security since 2012. His current activities span Reconfigurable Radio Systems security, IoT security, attribute‐based cryptography for access control, and language‐theoretic security. Mahdi Ben Alaya, Sensinov ‐ ‐ Member of the Programme Committee Mahdi Ben Alaya, PhD, is an international expert in IoT and M2M architectures. He is the Founder and CEO of Sensinov. He obtained a Ph.D in Networks, Telecommunications, Systems and Architectures from the Federal University of Toulouse and the LAAS‐CNRS laboratory in France. He serves as Vice Chairman of the oneM2M Testing Group. He is co‐founder and technical manager of the open source project Eclipse OM2M at the Eclipse foundation. He presented IoT tutorials in summer schools and universities worldwide including France, Taiwan, and Korea. He initiated and managed several R&D projects at LAAS‐CNRS and Sensinov including ITEA2‐USENET, ITEA2‐A2NETS, and H2020‐ LSP5‐AUTOPILOT. He has authored more than 20 refereed publications in international journals and conferences, as well as more than 50 contributions to IoT standards. Gil Bernabeu, GlobalPlatform Mr. Bernabeu was elected GlobalPlatform's Technical Director in 2005, after serving as Chair of the Systems Committee for over two years. His main role is to drive the development of GlobalPlatform Specifications to deploy secure digital services and devices and promote open ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Avoid the Silos and Help Build the True Internet of Things
    Avoid the Silos and Help Build the True Internet of Things April 2016 Aaron Vernon, CTO at Higgns [email protected] I N T R O D U C T I O N ● Aaron Vernon, CTO at Higgns ● Previously I was VP Software Engineering at LIFX and CTO at Two Bulls ● Chair of the AllSeen Alliance Common Frameworks Working Group ● I am going to cover the following: ○ The complexities of the current IoT landscape ○ How this affects companies and users ○ The Internet of Silos example ○ How we can work together better Transports W i F i ● Uses the 802.11 standard ● Standard on all mobile devices and routers ● Has become ubiquitous for users ● Great range ● Great bandwidth ● High power consumption ● High cost ● Onboarding experience can be complicated ● Examples: Nest Cam, LIFX, Canary, Honeywell Lyric B L U E T O O T H S M A R T ● Standard on most mobile devices ● Becoming increasingly ubiquitous ● Low bandwidth ● Medium range ● Low power consumption ● Low cost ● Smart Mesh is being worked on ● Examples: Flic, Ilumi, Elgato Eve Z I G B E E ● Uses the 802.15.4 standard ● Low bandwidth ● Low range ● Low power consumption ● Very low cost ● Forms a mesh network ● Typically requires a hub for the radio ● Known to have interop and interference problems ● Examples: Phillips Hue, large amount of sensors and actuators Z W A V E ● Proprietary - chips developed by a single manufacturer ● Uses different frequencies in different countries ● Low bandwidth ● Medium range ● Low power consumption ● Very low cost ● Forms a mesh network ● Better interoperability and less interference
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Spectrum Sharing Annual Report - 2014
    ® Dynamic Spectrum Sharing Annual Report - 2014 Document WINNF-14-P-0001 Version V0.2.16 14 August 2014 Terms and Conditions & Notices This document has been prepared by the Spectrum Sharing Annual Report Work Group to assist The Software Defined Radio Forum Inc. (or its successors or assigns, hereafter “the Forum”). It may be amended or withdrawn at a later time and it is not binding on any member of the Forum or of the Spectrum Sharing Annual Report. Contributors to this document that have submitted copyrighted materials (the Submission) to the Forum for use in this document retain copyright ownership of their original work, while at the same time granting the Forum a non-exclusive, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual, royalty-free license under the Submitter’s copyrights in the Submission to reproduce, distribute, publish, display, perform, and create derivative works of the Submission based on that original work for the purpose of developing this document under the Forum's own copyright. Permission is granted to the Forum’s participants to copy any portion of this document for legitimate purposes of the Forum. Copying for monetary gain or for other non-Forum related purposes is prohibited. THIS DOCUMENT IS BEING OFFERED WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY WHATSOEVER, AND IN PARTICULAR, ANY WARRANTY OF NON-INFRINGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. ANY USE OF THIS SPECIFICATION SHALL BE MADE ENTIRELY AT THE IMPLEMENTER'S OWN RISK, AND NEITHER THE FORUM, NOR ANY OF ITS MEMBERS OR SUBMITTERS, SHALL HAVE ANY LIABILITY WHATSOEVER TO ANY IMPLEMENTER OR THIRD PARTY FOR ANY DAMAGES OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, ARISING FROM THE USE OF THIS DOCUMENT.
    [Show full text]