A Blueprint for a 21St Century Legislature

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Blueprint for a 21St Century Legislature A Blueprint for a 21st Century Legislature Public Commission on the Oregon Legislature November 2006 A BLUEPRINT FOR A ST 21 CENTURY LEGISLATURE REPORT OF THE PUBLIC COMMISSION ON THE OREGON LEGISLATURE TO THE SEVENTY-FOURTH LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY In Accordance with Senate Bill 1084 (2005) November 2006 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS One of the benefits of living in a democracy is the ability to personally engage in making changes to the structure and function of government, peacefully. Over the past 15 months 32 Oregonians had that opportunity as appointed members of the Public Commission on the Legislature. Over 100 other Oregonians appeared before this Commission and committees to discuss their ideas, opinions and make suggestions for change. Many others communicated with us by e-mail, letters and phone calls in order to make their thoughts known. This has truly been democracy at work. Since 1859, when Oregon became a state, only two other commissions have been tasked with reviewing the operations and structure of the Oregon Legislature. The Blueprint for a 21st Century Legislature, as presented by this 2006 Commission, reflects the thinking and values of our time. We are indebted to President of the Senate, Peter Courtney and Speaker of the House of Representatives, Karen Minnis for taking the bold step of creating the Commission and giving us direction to engage at any level necessary to bring the best thinking and ideas to this work. We are equally indebted to the members of this commission, citizens who spoke with our committees, citizens who followed our proceedings, and many legislative staff who provided counsel or support for their time, energy, thought and debate that contributed to Commission recommendations in this report. Future generations of Oregonians are the beneficiaries of your work. Judge Laura Pryor, Co-Chair Gary Wilhelms, Co-Chair TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 5 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 11 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUNDAMENTAL REFORM • Open Primary........................................................................................................... 15 • Nonpartisan Legislature........................................................................................... 15 • Nonpartisan State Controller.................................................................................... 16 • Redistricting Commission........................................................................................ 17 • Funding Government Standards and Practices Commission ................................... 19 • Initiative Reform...................................................................................................... 19 • Campaign Finance ................................................................................................... 21 • Legislator Compensation ......................................................................................... 22 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INSTITUTIONAL REFORM • Annual Sessions and Session Structure .................................................................. 25 • Partisanship.............................................................................................................. 26 • Staffing Legislative Offices .................................................................................... 27 • Hiring Family Members........................................................................................... 29 • Alcohol Consumption .............................................................................................. 30 • Public Access........................................................................................................... 30 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REFORMING LEGISLATIVE OPERATIONS • Committees .............................................................................................................. 33 • Bills and Amendments............................................................................................. 35 • Program Evaluation ................................................................................................. 36 • Budget Notes............................................................................................................ 36 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVING FACILITIES AND TECHNOLOGY • Capitol Renovation and Comprehensive Facilities Plan.......................................... 39 • Wireless Access ....................................................................................................... 40 • Use of Technology................................................................................................... 40 • Oregon Channel ....................................................................................................... 41 • Audio and Video Hardware ..................................................................................... 41 • Security .................................................................................................................... 42 CONCLUSION..................................................................................................................................... 43 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION COMMITTEE SUMMARIES ................................................................................................... 47 • Facilities Committee; Management and Human Resources Committee; Process Committee; and The Public Institution Committee SENATE BILL 1084 (2005).................................................................................................... 65 COMMISSION INFORMATION .............................................................................................. 71 • Commission Members; Committee Membership; Meeting Dates; and Witnesses PROPOSALS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION................................................................. 75 PROPOSED LEGISLATION .................................................................................................... 91 BACKGROUND A BLUEPRINT FOR A 21ST CENTURY LEGISLATURE PUBLIC COMMISSION ON THE OREGON LEGISLATURE - 2 - A Blueprint for a 21st Century Legislature BACKGROUND Shortly before adjourning in August 2005, the Oregon State Senate and the Oregon House of Representatives passed Senate Bill 1084, which created the Public Commission on the Oregon Legislature. The bill, which was co-sponsored by Senate President Peter Courtney and House Speaker Karen Minnis, was subsequently signed into law by Governor Theodore Kulongoski. Senate Bill 1084 specified that the commission “shall conduct a review of and make recommendations on all aspects of the legislative branch, including the timing, frequency and length of legislative sessions, legislative procedures and the adequacy of legislative facilities and staffing.” The legislation also charged the commission to prepare a report for submission to the Emergency Board and to members of the Seventy-Fourth Legislative Assembly. Previous comprehensive reviews of the legislative branch were conducted in 1968 and 1974 and their recommendations were considered and implemented by subsequent Legislative Assemblies. The legislation further specified that the commission be comprised of two members of the House of Representatives, two members of the Senate, and 26 members of the public, who would be jointly appointed by the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House. Commission members represented diverse knowledge of and experience with the legislative process in all committee and commission discussions. Under the leadership of Co-Chairs Judge Laura Pryor and Gary Wilhelms, the commission held its first meeting on September 6, 2005, and met on eight subsequent occasions, with its final meeting on November 13, 2006. Each member of the commission was also assigned to serve on one of the following committees: Facilities; Human Resources; Management; Process; and The Public Institution. Each committee met on numerous occasions throughout 2005 and 2006 to hear testimony from experts on the legislative process, and to consider all proposals and ideas that had been received by the commission from members of the public, legislators, staff, agencies, local governments and commission members. All meetings of the full Public Commission and committee meetings were open to the public and to the media. The Supplemental Information section of this report contains: summaries of committee work; Senate Bill 1084; lists of members of the Public Commission, meeting dates of commission and committees and witnesses; proposals considered by committees; and proposed legislation. Public Commission on the Oregon Legislature - 3 - - 4 - A Blueprint for a 21st Century Legislature EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A BLUEPRINT FOR A 21ST CENTURY LEGISLATURE PUBLIC COMMISSION ON THE OREGON LEGISLATURE - 6 - A Blueprint for a 21st Century Legislature EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Oregon faces many difficult and complex challenges in the coming years. As the policy-making branch of state government, the Oregon Legislative Assembly must address these challenges and become a more efficient, effective institution. The Public Commission on the Oregon Legislature (PCOL) concludes that many policies and practices prevent the legislature
Recommended publications
  • 50 Years of Oregon Senior and Disability Policy and Advocacy: an Historical Chronology 1969-2019
    50 Years of Oregon Senior and Disability Policy and Advocacy: An Historical Chronology 1969-2019 By Dr. James (Jim) Davis Oregon State Council for Retired Citizens United Seniors of Oregon December 2020 0 Table of Contents Introduction Page 3 Yearly Chronology of Senior and Disability Policy and Advocacy 5 1969 5 1970 5 1971 6 1972 7 1973 8 1974 10 1975 11 1976 12 1977 13 1978 15 1979 17 1980 19 1981 22 1982 26 1983 28 1984 30 1985 32 1986 35 1987 36 1988 38 1989 41 1990 45 1991 47 1992 50 1993 53 1994 54 1995 55 1996 58 1997 60 1998 62 1999 65 2000 67 2001 68 2002 75 2003 76 2004 79 2005 80 2006 84 2007 85 2008 89 1 2009 91 2010 93 2011 95 2012 98 2013 99 2014 102 2015 105 2016 107 2017 109 2018 114 2019 118 Conclusion 124 2 50 Years of Oregon Senior and Disability Policy and Advocacy: An Historical Chronology 1969-2019 Introduction It is my pleasure to release the second edition of the 50 Years of Oregon Senior and Disability Policy and Advocacy: An Historical Chronology 1969-2019, a labor of love project that chronicles year-by-year the major highlights and activities in Oregon’s senior and disability policy development and advocacy since 1969, from an advocacy perspective. In particular, it highlights the development and maintenance of our nationally-renown community-based long term services and supports system, as well as the very strong grassroots, coalition-based advocacy efforts in the senior and disability communities in Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • View / Open Chapmangraves, Camas1.Pdf
    How Activism during the Vietnam Era Influenced Change in the Student Role on Campus Camas ChapmanGraves The University in Peace and War: HC 421 Professor Suzanne Clark March 13, 2005 ChapmanGraves 2 In describing United States student activists of the 1990’s, Kate Zernike says they are “a very different pack of protesters from the long-haired, antiestablishment dissenters of the past”.1 This seems to be a common attitude toward the student protesters of the 1960’s. The reality of 1960’s protests was not however what many may have imagined. While protests of the sixties may have included token hippies and a few violent dissenters, student protesters were not antiestablishment. On many campuses they even had their own form of establishment, and many members of this establishment would go on to play an important role in the United States government. At the University of Oregon, the student protest movement and its leaders became an integral part of student government. Not only was student government involved in protests, but the official actions taken by the University of Oregon student government, the Associated Students of the University of Oregon (ASUO), during this time reflect the attitudes of the student protesters. Students of the sixties wanted control over myriad aspects of their lives, and used the establishment of student government to fight for this control. This was clearly seen through specific actions taken by student government in the late 1960’s in an attempt to gain control over their education. At the University of Oregon, student government and student protest went hand in hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Voters' Pamphlet
    Washington Elections Division 3700 SW Murray Blvd. Beaverton, OR 97005 County www.co.washington.or.us voters’ pamphlet VOTE-BY-MAIL PRIMARY NOMINATING ELECTION May 20, 2008 To be counted, voted ballots must be in our office by 8:00 pm on May 20, 2008 Washington County Dear Voter: Board of County This pamphlet contains information for several dis- Commissioners tricts and there may be candidates/measures included that are not on your ballot. If you have any questions, Tom Brian, Chair call 503-846-5800. Dick Schouten, District 1 Desari Strader, District 2 Roy Rogers, District 3 Attention: Andy Duyck, District 4 Washington County Elections prints information as submitted. We do not correct spelling, punctuation, grammar, syntax, errors or inaccurate information. W-2 W-3 W-4 WASHINGTON COUNTY Commissioner, District 3 Roy R. Rogers (Nonpartisan) OCCUPATION: Certified Public Accountant /County Commissioner OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Managing Partner of large local firm. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Portland State University; Bachelor of Science Degree; Numerous additional courses in finance, management, and public finance. PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: County Commissioner (current); Mayor, City of Tualatin (3 terms); President Oregon Mayors Association; Clean Water Services Board; Numerous State, Regional and County Transportation and Planning Committees; Board Member of Enhanced Sheriffs Patrol, Urban Road Maintenance and Housing Authority Districts ROY IS INVOLVED! • Tigard First Citizen • Past President - Tigard Rotary, Tigard Chamber, Tigard
    [Show full text]
  • Ellen Rosenblum Sworn in As Attorney General 1989 -2012 T the Oregon State Capitol, Ellen Rosenblum Was Sworn in As Attorney General of Oregon on June 29
    Published Quarterly by Oregon Women Lawyers Volume 23, No. 3 Summer 2012 23 years of breaking barriers Ellen Rosenblum Sworn In as Attorney General 1989 -2012 t the Oregon State Capitol, Ellen Rosenblum was sworn in as attorney general of Oregon on June 29. AGovernor John Kitzhaber had appointed her to the office, vacated by John Kroger. She is the first woman to President serve as Oregon’s attorney general. Megan Livermore Governor Kitzhaber welcomed the overflowing crowd Vice President, President-Elect of Ellen’s friends, colleagues, and family, and the press, Kathleen J. Rastetter and introduced Oregon’s first female governor, Barbara Secretary Kendra Matthews Roberts. Following Governor Roberts was Justice Virginia Linder, the first woman to win a seat on the Oregon Su- Treasurer Laura Craska Cooper preme Court through a contested election. Both women Historian observed the historic nature of this appointment. Elizabeth Tedesco Milesnick After being sworn in by Governor Kitzhaber, Ellen said that she would lead the Department of Justice “so that Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum (left) Board Members and Justice Virginia Linder on June 29 Allison Boomer Oregon’s interests are represented at the highest level of Hon. Frances Burge ethics, professionalism, and devotion to public service.” Megan Burgess Gina Eiben Following the swearing-in ceremony was a public reception at the Mission Mill Dye House in Dana Forman Salem, where hundreds gathered to congratulate our new attorney general. Heather L. Weigler, Amber Hollister OWLS’ past president and Ellen’s campaign manager during the primary campaign, introduced her. Jaclyn Jenkins Angela Franco Lucero “Ellen isn’t motivated by what’s right for her; she’s motivated by what’s right for all of us.
    [Show full text]
  • Received Apr 13 1992
    RECEIVED APR 13 1992 ederal Communi~s Commission Office of the Secr'etafy ventura County's News Station KVEN Broadcasting Corp. P.O. Box 699, Ventura, CA 93002 R'ECE!VED April 9, 1992 APR 13 1992 FCC MAIL BRANCH / Secretary Federal Communications Commission / 1919 H St., N.H. Washington, D.C. 20554 RE : Rf·1- 7 9 3 2 _RH-7933, Attached you will find our formal comments with re- spect to the above mentioned petitions. There is in- eluded an original plus five copies and an additional six copies in order to provide the Chairman and each Commissioner with a copy. ~(). of CorJes 'et'd atI/ L,st ABe (j E Ventura • Oxnard • Southern California • FAX (805) 642-8595 (805) 485-2123 1-800-367-5429 (805) 656-5838 RECEIVED APR 13 1992 Federal Communications Commission Office of the Secretary Ventura County's News Station KVEN Broadcasting Corp. P.O. Box 699, Ventura, CA 93002 April 9, 1992 Secretary Federal Communications Commission 1919 M st., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: RM-7932 RM-7933 In these comments it is our desire to support the National Association of Broadcasters' Petition, RM- 7932, "To Suspend Temporarily New Commercial PM Sta- tion Allotment and Application Processing," and RM- 7933, "The Petition for Comprehensive Rule Making." The Commission should also be informed that I, Robert L. Fox, have been a broadcaster for over 36 years. Further, for 26 years I have been an owner and ope- rator of KVEN Broadcasting Corp, the licensee of KVEN and KHAY, Ventura, Ca. I serve as Chairman/CEO of the corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Portland
    CITY OF PORTLAND Mayor Mayor CHARLIE JEFFERSON HALES SMITH OCCUPATION: Senior Vice OCCUPATION: State President, HDR Engineering Representative, East Portland OCCUPATIONAL OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Small BACKGROUND: Founding Business Owner, Friends Executive Director, Oregon of Trees, Portland Parks Bus Project; Community Foundation, Hayhurst Organizer; Clerk, U.S. Court of Neighborhood Association Appeals EDUCATIONAL EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: Lewis and BACKGROUND: Grant HS, Clark College; University of University of Oregon, Harvard Virginia Law School PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Portland City PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Oregon House Commissioner of Representatives; House Democratic Leadership; Oregon Transparency Commission The Progressive Mayor We Can Count On “The 2011 Small Business Champion” “Charlie doesn’t just have Portland’s values — he makes them Oregon Microenterprise Network work. He’s the one who will really move Portland forward.” — Former Mayor Vera Katz Dear Neighbor, “The city needs a mayor who can work with others and get I‘m running for mayor to get Portland working better for everyone. things done. Charlie has the character and good judgment to make the right decisions for Portland.” – My priorities were shaped growing up in Portland, building Governor Ted a successful organization, and serving Portlanders in tough Kulongoski times: “He’ll deliver community policing, improve police accountability Homegrown Jobs: As Mayor, I’ll help local businesses and get illegal guns off our streets.” – Rosie Sizer, Former grow and thrive, boost workforce training, and spur smart Police Chief infrastructure, sustainable building retrofits and balanced transportation. “Charlie’s the proven choice for schools: he protected school days and teaching positions across Portland. As Mayor he’ll Safe & Healthy Families: I’ve worked to preserve vital get more resources into our classrooms.”– School Board services as budgets tightened, and led on MAX safety and Member Bobbie Regan curbing human trafficking.
    [Show full text]
  • WCRO-2020-02918 June 16, 2021 Christopher Page Chief
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE West Coast Region 1201 NE Lloyd Boulevard, Suite 1100 PORTLAND, OR 97232-1274 Refer to NMFS No: WCRO-2020-02918 June 16, 2021 Christopher Page Chief, Environmental Resources Branch United States Army Corps of Engineers Portland District 333 SW 1st Ave. Portland, Oregon 97204 Re: Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response for the Operations and Maintenance Dredging of the Federal Navigation Channel at Tongue Point, Clatsop County, Oregon; Elochoman Slough, Wahkiakum County, Washington; Lake River, Clark County, Washington; and Oregon Slough, Multnomah County, Oregon. Dear Mr. Page: Thank you for your letter of October 16, 2020, requesting initiation of consultation with NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) for the operations and maintenance dredging of the four Federal navigation channels referenced above. This consultation was conducted in accordance with the 2019 revised regulations that implement section 7 of the ESA (50 CFR 402, 84 FR 45016). Thank you, also, for your request for consultation pursuant to the essential fish habitat (EFH) provisions in Section 305(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1855(b)) for this action. In the attached biological opinion, NMFS concludes that the proposed action is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of: • Oncorhynchus tshawytscha: Lower Columbia River (LCR) Chinook salmon, Upper Columbia River (UCR) spring-run Chinook salmon, SR (SR) spring/summer Chinook salmon, Upper Willamette River (UWR) Chinook salmon, Snake River fall Chinook salmon; • O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Urban League of Poruand
    BOARD OF DRECTGRS APRL 15, 1937 12:00IPIiIrI NOON[eIIi MULT-PJRPOSEMULTI-PURPOSE CONFERENCECONFERENCE ROOMROOM JEAN PLAZA The UrbanUrban LeagueLeague ofof PortDandPorUand URBAN PLAZA 10 North Russell Street Portland, Oregon 97227 (503) 280-2600 AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Finance 2. Fund Raising 3. Program and Planning 4. Personnel 5. Nominating REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER REPORT OF THE CHAIRPERSON ITEMS OFDF INFORMATIONINFORMATION 1. Report of the President 2. Financial Report 3. Letter from Don Frisbee and Herb'sresponse 4. EOD Congratulatory Letters 5. Letter to Larry Frager 6. Proposal toto thethe JuvenileJuvenile ServicesServices ComniissionCommission 7. Testimony to State Legislatureon South Africa 8. Letter from Natale SicuroSicuro andand Herb'sHerb'sresponse 9-9. Letter to Natale Sicuro 10. Whitney M. Young Learning Center Flyer 11. Employment Placement List 12. ESI Stock Certificate 13. Letter from Walter Morris and Herb's response 14. Los Angeles UrbanUrban LeagueLeague ProgramnieProgramme Book URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND BOARD OF DIRECTORS MARCH 18, 1987 The March meeting of the Urban League Board of Directors, held in the Multi-Purpose Conference Room, Urban Plaza, 10 North Russell Street, was called to order at 12:18 P.M. by Chairperson Linda Rasmussen. The following Directors were in attendance: Donny Adair, Bobbie Gary, Avel Gordly, Tom Kelley, Shirley Minor, Linda Rasmussen, Joel Smith, Irwin Starr, Bob Sutcliff, Peter Thompson, Thane Tienson, Jack Vogel and Valerie White. The following Directors were absent with excuse: Bridget Flanagan, Jeff Millner, Larry Raff and Nancy Wilgenbusch. The following Director was absent without excuse: Skip Collier. Staff in attendance were: Herb Cawthorne, Carol Sutcliff, Ray Leary and Pauline Reed.
    [Show full text]
  • Legally Trained Legislators
    2005 Legislature Legally Trained Legislators Legally Trained Legislators Despite what many people may assume, there are relatively few lawyers in the Oregon legislature. Only 12 of the 90 members of the 73rd Legislative Assembly have any formal legal education, and only 10 are mem- bers of the Oregon State Bar. State Elected Officials with Legal Training 12 Legally Trained Legislators in the 2005 Session Oregon Senate: Statewide Office Peter Courtney (D) Ted Kulongoski (D) Marion County Governor Kate Brown (D) Hardy Myers (D) Multnomah and Clackamas Counties State Attorney General David Nelson (R)* Information Numbers Umatilla, Wallowa, Morrow, and Union Counties Legislative Committees Charlie Ringo (D) (503) 986-1813 Washington County House Democratic Office Floyd Prozanski (D) (503) 986-1900 Lane and Douglas Counties House Republican Office Oregon House of Representatives: (503) 986-1400 Dennis Richardson (R) Senate Republican Office Jackson and Josephine Counties (503) 986-1950 Phil Barnhart (D) Senate Democratic Office Linn and Lane Counties (503) 986-1700 Robert Ackerman (D) Legislative Counsel Lane County (503) 986-1243 Dan Doyle (R) Distribution Center (for copies of bills) Marion County (503)986-1180 Betsy Johnson (D)* www.leg.state.or.us Columbia, Clatsop, and Tillamook Counties Oregon State Bar, Public Affairs Brad Avakian (D) (503) 620-0222 ext. 376 Washington County Governor’s Legal Counsel Greg Macpherson (D), (503) 627-7006 Clackamas and Multnomah Counties *Not a member of the Oregon State Bar ■ 2005 LEGISLATIVE TIPS HANDBOOK 13 2005 Legislative Committees 2005 Legislative Committees 2005 Legislative Committees 2005 Judiciary Committee 2005 Ways & Means Committee Senate Senate Sen. Ginny Burdick, Chair Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NFS farm 10-900 OMBNo. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) Oregon WoidPcrfect 6.0 Format (Reviled July 199S) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Places Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the informal] property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of signi: Eegories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. historic name MORSE. WAYNE. FARM other names/site number Edgewood Farm; Morse Ranch Park 2/* street & number 595 Crest Drive n/a not for publication city or town Eugene ______ n/a vicinity As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this ^.nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _x_meets _does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant _ nationally _statewide ^c locally. (_jSee continuation sheet for additional comments.) / Deputy SHPO December 22.1998 Signature of certifying official/Title Date Oregon State Historic Preservation Office State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property _meets _does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Ihlfliii.Iwiuix.Iibiiiih'lfliii.Iwu..Iiii F1ii Ii
    JkPiR L 2, MU:flLpncEMUflLpflcECON ROCM I LL. IhLfliii.iWiuix.iIbiiIIh'Lfliii.iWu..iIiI F1ii ii. 0 URBAN PLAZA 10 North Russell Street Portland, Oregon 97227 (503) 280-2600 URBAN LEAGUE OPOF PORTLAND BOARD OF DIRECTORS APRIL 22, 1992 *** 7:30 a.m. *** AGENDA APPROVAL OFOF MINUTES:MINUTES: March REPORT FROM THE CHAIRCHAIR REPORT FROM THETHE PRESIDENT: COMMITTEE REPORTS FINANCE CO41'4ITTEECOMMITTEE EXECUTIVE COI4NITTEECOMMITTEE NOMINATING COMMITTEECOMMITTEE FUND RAISING COMMUNITY RELATIONS RELATIONS COI4NITTEECOMMITTEE PERSONNEL COMMITTEECOMMITTEE PROGRAM ANDAND PLANNINGPLANNING COMMITTEECOMMITTEE GUILD ADJOURNMENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING March 25, 1992 The March Board Board of of DirectorsDirectors meetingmeeting commencedcommenced at at 7:34 a.m.a.m. onon March 25,25, 1992. The meetingmeeting of of thethe Urban League League Board Board of of Directors, Directors, held held inin the Multi-Purpose ConferenceConference Room, Room,Urban Plaza,Plaza, 10North Russell Street, waswas called toto orderorder atat 7:34 7:34 a.m.a.m. byby ChairChair BillBill Wyatt.Wyatt. The followingfollowing DirectorsDirectors were inin attendance:attendance: ClaraClara Padilla-Andrews,Padilla-Andrews, James Boehlke,Boehlke, Louis Boston,Boston, FayeFaye Burch,Burch, EdEd DeWald,DeWald, Marva Fabien,Fabien, Tom Gallagher, Gallagher, SharonSharon Gary-Smith,Gary-Smith, Ed Ed Hardy, Hardy, Elizabeth Elizabeth Kutza,Kutza, Rita Lucas, Judi Pitre,Pitre, Terry Terry Rogers, Rogers, Gina Gina Wood,Wood, BillBill Wyatt.Wyatt. The followingfollowing Directors werewere absentabsent withwith excuse:excuse: JoanJoan Brown-Kline, Brown-Kline, Rian Brown,Brown, James James Francesconi, Francesconi, Kevin Kevin Fuller, Fuller, Donnie Donnie Griffin, Griffin, StuartStuart Hall, MattMatt Hennessee.Hennessee. The followingfollowing DirectorsDirectors werewere absent withoutwithout excuse:excuse: WallyWally Sca1esScales, The minutesminutes forfor thethe FebruaryFebruary meetingmeeting werewere approved.approved.
    [Show full text]
  • 34 ^ Washington, Wednesday, October 2, 1957 TITLE 3—THE PRESIDENT CONTENTS
    FEDERAL« EGISTER VOLUME 22 * » 3 4 ^ NUMBER 191 OA/i t e O * Washington, Wednesday, October 2, 1957 TITLE 3— THE PRESIDENT DONE at the City of Washington this CONTENTS 26th day of September in the year of our PROCLAMATION 3205 Lord nineteen hundred and THE PRESIDENT [ s e a l] fifty-seven, and of the Inde­ National E m p l o y t h e P h y s ic a l l y Proclamation Page Handicapped W e e k , 1957 pendence of the United States National Employ the Physically of America the one hundred and eighty- Handicapped Week, 1957:_____ _ 7779 BT THE PRESIDENT OP THE UNITED STATES second. OF AMERICA D w ig h t D . E is e n h o w e r EXECUTIVE AGENCIES A PROCLAMATION By the President: Agricultural Marketing Service WHEREAS equal opportunity for em­ J o h n F oster D u l l e s , Proposed rule making: ployment is basic to our belief in human Secretary of State. Milk handling, marketing areas : dignity and should never be denied any Louisville, Ky_________________ 7792 qualified person because of physical im­ [P. R. Doc. 57-8138; Piled, Sept. 30, 1957; Philadelphia, Pa_____________ 7800 . 2:05 p. m.] pairment; and Rules and regulations : WHEREAS our expanding economy Onions, canned; U. S. standards requires more workers, the useful em­ TITLE 6— AGRICULTURAL CREDIT for grades— __________________ 7782 Potatoes, fresh Irish ; Fresh Irish ployment of all who are able and willing Potatoes-Livestock Feed Di­ to work; and Chapter V— Agricultural Marketing version Program Y M D 3a____ 7779 WHEREAS the physically handi­ Service, Department of Agriculture Agriculture Department capped, with the aid of expanded rehabil­ Subchapter B— Export and Domestic Consumption See Agricultual Marketing Service; itation and training programs, are able Programs Commodity Stabilization Serv­ to perform many of the skilled and de­ P art 519— F resh I r ish P otatoes ice.
    [Show full text]