DOCSLIB.ORG

REPORT on the INVASIVE SPECIES COMPONENT of the MEDA’S, TDA & SAP for the ASCLME PROJECT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REPORT on the INVASIVE SPECIES COMPONENT of the MEDA’S, TDA & SAP for the ASCLME PROJECT REPORT ON THE INVASIVE SPECIES COMPONENT OF THE MEDA’s, TDA & SAP FOR THE ASCLME PROJECT Adnan Awad Consultant Cape Town, South Africa 1 Table of Contents PART I: INTRODUCTION TO THE PROJECT ..................................................................................... 3 1. PROJECT BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Scope of Project ............................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Project Objectives ......................................................................................................... 4 2. REVISIONS & ADDITIONS TO THE PROJECT .................................................................................... 5 3. METHODS ............................................................................................................................ 5 3.1 Desktop Review ............................................................................................................ 5 3.2 Recommendations & Guidelines .................................................................................... 6 3.3 Training......................................................................................................................... 6 PART II: DESK TOP STUDY OF RELEVANT ACTIVITIES & INFORMATION FOR MEDA/TDA/SAP ......... 7 4. BASELINE INFORMATION ON MARINE INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES IN THE REGION ....................................... 7 4.1 Invasive & Alien Species ................................................................................................ 7 4.2 National IAS and HAB Records ....................................................................................... 7 4.2.1 Comoros ................................................................................................................ 8 4.2.2 Kenya .................................................................................................................... 8 4.2.3 Madagascar ........................................................................................................... 9 4.2.4 Mauritius ............................................................................................................. 10 4.2.5 Mozambique ....................................................................................................... 10 4.2.6 Seychelles ............................................................................................................ 10 4.2.7 Somalia ............................................................................................................... 11 4.2.8 South Africa ......................................................................................................... 11 4.2.9 Tanzania .............................................................................................................. 12 4.3 Generation of Species lists .......................................................................................... 13 5. REVIEW OF HAB EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES IN THE REGION ............................................................... 14 5.1 HAB’s in Kenya and Somalia ........................................................................................ 17 5.2 HAB’s in Mauritius and Rodrigues ................................................................................ 18 5.3 HAB’s in South Africa................................................................................................... 18 5.4 HAB’s in Tanzania ........................................................................................................ 19 6. INVASIVE SPECIES CONTINGENCY PLANNING ............................................................................... 19 7. RELEVANT INSTITUTIONS & ACTIVITIES IN THE REGION ................................................................... 20 8. GOVERNANCE , POLICY & LEGAL PROVISIONS RELATED TO INVASIVE SPECIES ....................................... 22 8.1 International Frameworks ........................................................................................... 22 8.1.1 UN Convention of the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), 1982 .......................................... 23 8.1.2 Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) ............................................................. 24 8.1.3 IMO Ballast Water Management (BWM) Convention, 2004 .................................. 27 8.1.4 Nairobi Convention .............................................................................................. 29 8.2 National Provisions & Progress .................................................................................... 30 8.2.1 Comoros .............................................................................................................. 31 8.2.2 Kenya .................................................................................................................. 34 8.2.3 Madagascar ......................................................................................................... 36 8.2.4 Mauritius ............................................................................................................. 38 8.2.5 Mozambique ....................................................................................................... 39 8.2.6 Seychelles ............................................................................................................ 40 2 8.2.7 Somalia ............................................................................................................... 41 8.2.8 South Africa ......................................................................................................... 42 8.2.9 Tanzania .............................................................................................................. 43 9. GENERAL CONCLUSIONS FROM DESKTOP REVIEW ......................................................................... 44 PART III: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INTEGRATION INTO PARTNERSHIP NETWORK ...................... 44 10. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................ 44 10.1 Regional Marine IAS MoU between Key Partners ..................................................... 45 10.2 Technical Training Programme ................................................................................. 45 10.3 Survey & Monitoring Programme ............................................................................ 46 10.4 Regional Ballast Water Strategy & Action Plan ......................................................... 46 10.5 Science to Governance Forum & WIO Alliance ......................................................... 47 11. IMO-GBP ........................................................................................................................ 48 11.1 Progress to date ...................................................................................................... 48 11.2 Recommendations .................................................................................................. 49 12. IOI/GISP .......................................................................................................................... 49 13. GEOHAB & THE IOC-UNESCO HAB PROGRAMME ................................................................... 50 14. PENA F/PMAESA .............................................................................................................. 50 PART IV: GUIDELINES FOR LEGAL, POLICY & INSTITUTIONAL REFORM ......................................... 51 15. GENERAL GOAL OF APPROACH AND GUIDELINES .......................................................................... 51 16. SOCIO -POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS .......................................................................................... 52 16.1 Assessing the Costs & Benefits ................................................................................. 52 16.2 Ensuring Stakeholder Involvement .......................................................................... 53 17. TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................................................. 54 17.1 Evaluating Risk ........................................................................................................ 55 17.2 Monitoring of Invasions ........................................................................................... 55 17.3 Legal, Policy & Institutional Aspects ......................................................................... 56 17.4 Building Capacity & Training .................................................................................... 56 PART V: REGIONAL TRAINING & WORKSHOP .............................................................................. 57 18. REGIONAL TRAINING IN MAURITIUS ......................................................................................... 57 19. PROPOSED REGIONAL WORKSHOP ........................................................................................... 59 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 60 ANNEX I SAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE ............................................................................................ 64 ANNEX II REGIONAL INTRODUCED SPECIES LIST .....................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Beachflea Platorchestia Platensis
    The beachflea Platorchestia OCEANOLOGIA, 48 (2), 2006. pp. 287–295. platensis (Krøyer, 1845): C 2006, by Institute of a new addition to the Oceanology PAS. Polish fauna (with KEYWORDS a key to Baltic talitrid Platorchestia platensis amphipods)* Talitrid amphipod Southern Baltic John I. Spicer1 Urszula Janas2 1 Marine Biology and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institute of Oceanography, University of Gdańsk, al. Marszałka Piłsudskiego 46, PL–81–378 Gdynia, Poland Received 20 December 2005, revised 23 May 2006, accepted 5 June 2006. Abstract The present paper reports for the first time on the occurrence of Platorchestia platensis (Krøyer, 1845) (Crustacea, Amphipoda) in Puck Bay (southern Baltic, Poland) in May 2005. A key to the Baltic talitrids is given, which can be used to identify males and females of the four species occurring on Polish shores (Talitrus saltator, Talorchestia deshayesii, Orchestia cavimana, Platorchestia platensis)and additionally Orchestia gammarellus, which may yet be found in the Polish coastal zone. Only three species of talitrid amphipod (Crustacea) have been recorded from Polish shores. The sandhoppers Talitrus saltator (Montagu, 1808) and Talorchestia deshayesii (Audouin, 1826) are ubiquitous beneath flotsam and jetsam or wrack cast up at the high water mark on sandy beaches * This work was funded through European Community project BALTDER under the fifth FP, contract No EVK3-CT-2002-80005 and the Polish Ministry of Scientific Research and Information. The complete text of the paper is available at http://www.iopan.gda.pl/oceanologia/ 288 J.
    [Show full text]
  • An Updated Checklist of Aquatic Plants of Myanmar and Thailand
    Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e1019 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.2.e1019 Taxonomic paper An updated checklist of aquatic plants of Myanmar and Thailand Yu Ito†, Anders S. Barfod‡ † University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand ‡ Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark Corresponding author: Yu Ito ([email protected]) Academic editor: Quentin Groom Received: 04 Nov 2013 | Accepted: 29 Dec 2013 | Published: 06 Jan 2014 Citation: Ito Y, Barfod A (2014) An updated checklist of aquatic plants of Myanmar and Thailand. Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e1019. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.2.e1019 Abstract The flora of Tropical Asia is among the richest in the world, yet the actual diversity is estimated to be much higher than previously reported. Myanmar and Thailand are adjacent countries that together occupy more than the half the area of continental Tropical Asia. This geographic area is diverse ecologically, ranging from cool-temperate to tropical climates, and includes from coast, rainforests and high mountain elevations. An updated checklist of aquatic plants, which includes 78 species in 44 genera from 24 families, are presented based on floristic works. This number includes seven species, that have never been listed in the previous floras and checklists. The species (excluding non-indigenous taxa) were categorized by five geographic groups with the exception of to reflect the rich diversity of the countries' floras. Keywords Aquatic plants, flora, Myanmar, Thailand © Ito Y, Barfod A. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Common Native & Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska
    Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska Cover photographs by (top to bottom, left to right): Tara Chestnut/Hannah E. Anderson, Jamie Fenneman, Vanessa Morgan, Dana Visalli, Jamie Fenneman, Lynda K. Moore and Denny Lassuy. Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska This document is based on An Aquatic Plant Identification Manual for Washington’s Freshwater Plants, which was modified with permission from the Washington State Department of Ecology, by the Center for Lakes and Reservoirs at Portland State University for Alaska Department of Fish and Game US Fish & Wildlife Service - Coastal Program US Fish & Wildlife Service - Aquatic Invasive Species Program December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................................ x Introduction Overview ............................................................................. xvi How to Use This Manual .................................................... xvi Categories of Special Interest Imperiled, Rare and Uncommon Aquatic Species ..................... xx Indigenous Peoples Use of Aquatic Plants .............................. xxi Invasive Aquatic Plants Impacts ................................................................................. xxi Vectors ................................................................................. xxii Prevention Tips .................................................... xxii Early Detection and Reporting
    [Show full text]
  • The 17Th International Colloquium on Amphipoda
    Biodiversity Journal, 2017, 8 (2): 391–394 MONOGRAPH The 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda Sabrina Lo Brutto1,2,*, Eugenia Schimmenti1 & Davide Iaciofano1 1Dept. STEBICEF, Section of Animal Biology, via Archirafi 18, Palermo, University of Palermo, Italy 2Museum of Zoology “Doderlein”, SIMUA, via Archirafi 16, University of Palermo, Italy *Corresponding author, email: [email protected] th th ABSTRACT The 17 International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17 ICA) has been organized by the University of Palermo (Sicily, Italy), and took place in Trapani, 4-7 September 2017. All the contributions have been published in the present monograph and include a wide range of topics. KEY WORDS International Colloquium on Amphipoda; ICA; Amphipoda. Received 30.04.2017; accepted 31.05.2017; printed 30.06.2017 Proceedings of the 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17th ICA), September 4th-7th 2017, Trapani (Italy) The first International Colloquium on Amphi- Poland, Turkey, Norway, Brazil and Canada within poda was held in Verona in 1969, as a simple meet- the Scientific Committee: ing of specialists interested in the Systematics of Sabrina Lo Brutto (Coordinator) - University of Gammarus and Niphargus. Palermo, Italy Now, after 48 years, the Colloquium reached the Elvira De Matthaeis - University La Sapienza, 17th edition, held at the “Polo Territoriale della Italy Provincia di Trapani”, a site of the University of Felicita Scapini - University of Firenze, Italy Palermo, in Italy; and for the second time in Sicily Alberto Ugolini - University of Firenze, Italy (Lo Brutto et al., 2013). Maria Beatrice Scipione - Stazione Zoologica The Organizing and Scientific Committees were Anton Dohrn, Italy composed by people from different countries.
    [Show full text]
  • National Reports (Term of Reference A) Presented at the 46Th Meeting of the ICES Working Group on Introductions and Transfers Of
    National Reports (Term of Reference a) Presented at the 46th meeting of the ICES Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms, held in Gdynia, Poland from 4 to 6 March 2020. Arranged Alphabetically by Country Compiled by Cynthia H McKenzie, Chair, WGITMO CANADA …………………………………………………………………… …. 2 DENMARK ………………………………………………………………………. 10 FINLAND ………………………………………………………………………. 18 FRANCE ………………………………………………………………………. 21 GERMANY ………………………………………………………………………. 33 GREECE ………………………………………………………………………. 46 ICELAND ………………………………………………………………………. 54 ITALY ………………………………………………………………………. 58 LITHUANIA ………………………………………………………………………. 73 NETHERLANDS …………………………………………………………………. 75 NORWAY ………………………………………………………………………. 77 POLAND ………………………………………………………………………. 86 PORTUGAL ………………………………………………………………………. 89 SWEDEN ………………………………………………………………………. 99 UNITED KINGDOM ……………………………………………………………. 104 UNITED STATES …………………………………………………………………. 119 1 CANADA National Report for Canada 2019 Report Prepared By: Cynthia McKenzie, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Newfoundland and Labrador Region: [email protected]; Contributions By: Nathalie Simard, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Quebec Region: [email protected]; Kimberly Howland, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Central and Arctic Region: [email protected]; Renée Bernier and Chantal Coomber, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Gulf Region: renee.bernier@dfo- mpo.gc.ca, [email protected]; Angelica Silva, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Maritimes Region: [email protected] Overview: NEW or SPREAD
    [Show full text]
  • The Plankton Lifeform Extraction Tool: a Digital Tool to Increase The
    Discussions https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2021-171 Earth System Preprint. Discussion started: 21 July 2021 Science c Author(s) 2021. CC BY 4.0 License. Open Access Open Data The Plankton Lifeform Extraction Tool: A digital tool to increase the discoverability and usability of plankton time-series data Clare Ostle1*, Kevin Paxman1, Carolyn A. Graves2, Mathew Arnold1, Felipe Artigas3, Angus Atkinson4, Anaïs Aubert5, Malcolm Baptie6, Beth Bear7, Jacob Bedford8, Michael Best9, Eileen 5 Bresnan10, Rachel Brittain1, Derek Broughton1, Alexandre Budria5,11, Kathryn Cook12, Michelle Devlin7, George Graham1, Nick Halliday1, Pierre Hélaouët1, Marie Johansen13, David G. Johns1, Dan Lear1, Margarita Machairopoulou10, April McKinney14, Adam Mellor14, Alex Milligan7, Sophie Pitois7, Isabelle Rombouts5, Cordula Scherer15, Paul Tett16, Claire Widdicombe4, and Abigail McQuatters-Gollop8 1 10 The Marine Biological Association (MBA), The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB, UK. 2 Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquacu∑lture Science (Cefas), Weymouth, UK. 3 Université du Littoral Côte d’Opale, Université de Lille, CNRS UMR 8187 LOG, Laboratoire d’Océanologie et de Géosciences, Wimereux, France. 4 Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, UK. 5 15 Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (MNHN), CRESCO, 38 UMS Patrinat, Dinard, France. 6 Scottish Environment Protection Agency, Angus Smith Building, Maxim 6, Parklands Avenue, Eurocentral, Holytown, North Lanarkshire ML1 4WQ, UK. 7 Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft, UK. 8 Marine Conservation Research Group, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK. 9 20 The Environment Agency, Kingfisher House, Goldhay Way, Peterborough, PE4 6HL, UK. 10 Marine Scotland Science, Marine Laboratory, 375 Victoria Road, Aberdeen, AB11 9DB, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.3 Impact of Invasive Aquatic Plants on Waterfowl
    1.3 Impact of Invasive Aquatic Plants on Waterfowl Ryan M. Wersal: Minnesota State University Mankato, Mankato MN; [email protected] Kurt D. Getsinger: US Army ERDC, Vicksburg MS; [email protected] Introduction Studies that evaluate the relationship between waterfowl and aquatic plants (native or nonnative) usually focus on the food habits and feeding ecology of waterfowl. Therefore, the purpose of this section is to describe the dynamics of waterfowl feeding in relation to aquatic plants. The habitats used by waterfowl for breeding, wintering and foraging are diverse and change based on the annual life cycle of waterfowl and seasonal conditions of the habitat. For example, waterfowl require large amounts of protein during migration, nesting and molting, and they fulfill this requirement by consuming aquatic invertebrates. As noted in Sections 1.1 and 1.2, a strong relationship exists between high numbers of aquatic invertebrates and diverse aquatic plant communities, so diverse plant communities also play an important role in waterfowl health by hosting the invertebrates needed to subsidize waterfowl migration, nesting and molting. After all, waterfowl native to the US have evolved alongside diverse plant communities that are likewise native to the US and utilize these plants and associated invertebrates to meet their energy needs. Metabolic energy demands of waterfowl are high during the winter months, so waterfowl need foods that are high in carbohydrates such as plant seeds, tubers and rhizomes during winter. Many waterfowl will sometimes abandon aquatic plant foraging while on their wintering grounds and feed instead on high-energy agricultural crops such as wheat, corn, rice and soybeans.
    [Show full text]
  • Bankia Setacea Class: Bivalvia, Heterodonta, Euheterodonta
    Phylum: Mollusca Bankia setacea Class: Bivalvia, Heterodonta, Euheterodonta Order: Imparidentia, Myida The northwest or feathery shipworm Family: Pholadoidea, Teredinidae, Bankiinae Taxonomy: The original binomen for Bankia the presence of long siphons. Members of setacea was Xylotrya setacea, described by the family Teredinidae are modified for and Tryon in 1863 (Turner 1966). William Leach distiguished by a wood-boring mode of life described several molluscan genera, includ- (Sipe et al. 2000), pallets at the siphon tips ing Xylotrya, but how his descriptions were (see Plate 394C, Coan and Valentich-Scott interpreted varied. Although Menke be- 2007) and distinct anterior shell indentation. lieved Xylotrya to be a member of the Phola- They are commonly called shipworms (though didae, Gray understood it as a member of they are not worms at all!) and bore into many the Terdinidae and synonyimized it with the wooden structures. The common name ship- genus Bankia, a genus designated by the worm is based on their vermiform morphology latter author in 1842. Most authors refer to and a shell that only covers the anterior body Bankia setacea (e.g. Kozloff 1993; Sipe et (Ricketts and Calvin 1952; see images in al. 2000; Coan and Valentich-Scott 2007; Turner 1966). Betcher et al. 2012; Borges et al. 2012; Da- Body: Bizarrely modified bivalve with re- vidson and de Rivera 2012), although one duced, sub-globular body. For internal anato- recent paper sites Xylotrya setacea (Siddall my, see Fig. 1, Canadian…; Fig. 1 Betcher et et al. 2009). Two additional known syno- al. 2012. nyms exist currently, including Bankia Color: osumiensis, B.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Marine Alien and Invasive Species
    Table 1: The list of 96 marine alien and invasive species recorded along the coastline of South Africa. Phylum Class Taxon Status Common name Natural Range ANNELIDA Polychaeta Alitta succinea Invasive pile worm or clam worm Atlantic coast ANNELIDA Polychaeta Boccardia proboscidea Invasive Shell worm Northern Pacific ANNELIDA Polychaeta Dodecaceria fewkesi Alien Black coral worm Pacific Northern America ANNELIDA Polychaeta Ficopomatus enigmaticus Invasive Estuarine tubeworm Australia ANNELIDA Polychaeta Janua pagenstecheri Alien N/A Europe ANNELIDA Polychaeta Neodexiospira brasiliensis Invasive A tubeworm West Indies, Brazil ANNELIDA Polychaeta Polydora websteri Alien oyster mudworm N/A ANNELIDA Polychaeta Polydora hoplura Invasive Mud worm Europe, Mediterranean ANNELIDA Polychaeta Simplaria pseudomilitaris Alien N/A Europe BRACHIOPODA Lingulata Discinisca tenuis Invasive Disc lamp shell Namibian Coast BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Virididentula dentata Invasive Blue dentate moss animal Indo-Pacific BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Bugulina flabellata Invasive N/A N/A BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Bugula neritina Invasive Purple dentate mos animal N/A BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Conopeum seurati Invasive N/A Europe BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Cryptosula pallasiana Invasive N/A Europe BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Watersipora subtorquata Invasive Red-rust bryozoan Caribbean CHLOROPHYTA Ulvophyceae Cladophora prolifera Invasive N/A N/A CHLOROPHYTA Ulvophyceae Codium fragile Invasive green sea fingers Korea CHORDATA Actinopterygii Cyprinus carpio Invasive Common carp Asia CHORDATA Ascidiacea
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea, Amphipoda, Talitridae) from Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean Coastal Regions
    Zoosyst. Evol. 90 (2) 2014, 133–146 | DOI 10.3897/zse.90.8410 museum für naturkunde New genus and two new species of driftwood hoppers (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Talitridae) from northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean coastal regions David J. Wildish1,2 1 Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Biological Station, 531 Brandy Cove Road, St. Andrews, New Brunswick, E5B 2S9, Canada 2 Atlantic Reference Centre, Huntsman Marine Science Centre, 1 Lower Campus Road, St. Andrews, New Brunswick, E5B 2L7, Canada http://zoobank.org/D1D134DB-3E05-4434-9327-7BF90A912982 Corresponding author: David J. Wildish ([email protected]) Abstract Received 12 August 2014 A new specialist driftwood talitrid from the Swale, U.K., is figured and described as Ne- Accepted 21 September 2014 otenorchestia kenwildishi gen. n., sp. n. A further new driftwood talitrid, Macarorchestia Published 10 October 2014 pavesiae sp. n., is figured and described from coastal regions in the Adriatic Sea.Orches - tia microphtalma Amanieu & Salvat, 1963 from the Atlantic coast of France is re-des- Academic editor: ignated as Macarorchestia microphtalma (Amanieu & Salvat, 1963). A key is provided Matthias Glaubrecht for the known species of driftwood talitrids in northeastern Atlantic and Mediterranean coastal regions. Key Words Neotenorchestia kenwildishi gen. n., sp. n. Macarorchestia pavesiae sp. n. Macarorchestia microphtalma (Amanieu & Salvat, 1963) comb. n. Introduction supporting the lineal “island” theory was presented in Wildish (2012), showing that driftwood talitrids reached Driftwood specialist
    [Show full text]
  • (Allman, 1859). Sarsia Eximia Es Una Especie De Hidroide Atecado
    Método de Evaluación Rápida de Invasividad (MERI) para especies exóticas en México Sarsia eximia (Allman, 1859). Sarsia eximia (Allman, 1859). Foto (c) Ken-ichi Ueda, algunos derechos reservados (CC BY-NC-SA) (http://www.naturalista.mx/taxa/51651-Sarsia-eximia) Sarsia eximia es una especie de hidroide atecado perteneciente a la familia Corynidae. Su distribución geográfica es muy amplia, siendo registrada en localidades costeras de todo el mundo. Se puede encontrar en una amplia gama de hábitats de la costa rocosa, pero también es abundante en algas y puede a menudo ser encontrado en las cuerdas y flotadores de trampas para langostas (GBIF, 2016). Información taxonómica Reino: Animalia Phylum: Cnidaria Clase: Hydrozoa Orden: Anthoathecata Familia: Corynidae Género: Sarsia Especie: Sarsia eximia (Allman, 1859) Nombre común: coral de fuego Sinónimo: Coryne eximia. Resultado: 0.2469 Categoría de riesgo: Medio Método de Evaluación Rápida de Invasividad (MERI) para especies exóticas en México Sarsia eximia (Allman, 1859). Descripción de la especie Sarsia eximia es una especie de hidroide marino colonial, formado por una hidrorriza filiforme de 184 micras de diámetro que recorre el substrato y de la que se elevan hidrocaules monosifónicos, que pueden alcanzar 2.3 cm de altura, con ramificaciones frecuentes, y ramas en un sólo plano, orientación distal y generalmente con un recurbamiento basal. Su diámetro es bastante uniforme en toda su longitud, con un perisarco espeso, liso u ondulado, y con numerosas anillaciones espaciadas. Típicamente se presentan 11-20 basales en el hidrocaule, y un número similar o superior en el inicio de las ramas, aunque asimismo existen algunas pequeñas agrupaciones irregulares en diversos puntos de la colonia, y en la totalidad de algunas ramas.
    [Show full text]
  • CNIDARIA Corals, Medusae, Hydroids, Myxozoans
    FOUR Phylum CNIDARIA corals, medusae, hydroids, myxozoans STEPHEN D. CAIRNS, LISA-ANN GERSHWIN, FRED J. BROOK, PHILIP PUGH, ELLIOT W. Dawson, OscaR OcaÑA V., WILLEM VERvooRT, GARY WILLIAMS, JEANETTE E. Watson, DENNIS M. OPREsko, PETER SCHUCHERT, P. MICHAEL HINE, DENNIS P. GORDON, HAMISH J. CAMPBELL, ANTHONY J. WRIGHT, JUAN A. SÁNCHEZ, DAPHNE G. FAUTIN his ancient phylum of mostly marine organisms is best known for its contribution to geomorphological features, forming thousands of square Tkilometres of coral reefs in warm tropical waters. Their fossil remains contribute to some limestones. Cnidarians are also significant components of the plankton, where large medusae – popularly called jellyfish – and colonial forms like Portuguese man-of-war and stringy siphonophores prey on other organisms including small fish. Some of these species are justly feared by humans for their stings, which in some cases can be fatal. Certainly, most New Zealanders will have encountered cnidarians when rambling along beaches and fossicking in rock pools where sea anemones and diminutive bushy hydroids abound. In New Zealand’s fiords and in deeper water on seamounts, black corals and branching gorgonians can form veritable trees five metres high or more. In contrast, inland inhabitants of continental landmasses who have never, or rarely, seen an ocean or visited a seashore can hardly be impressed with the Cnidaria as a phylum – freshwater cnidarians are relatively few, restricted to tiny hydras, the branching hydroid Cordylophora, and rare medusae. Worldwide, there are about 10,000 described species, with perhaps half as many again undescribed. All cnidarians have nettle cells known as nematocysts (or cnidae – from the Greek, knide, a nettle), extraordinarily complex structures that are effectively invaginated coiled tubes within a cell.
    [Show full text]