SEC Rule 15C2-11Restricted Securities
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2G-Amp-3G-Mobile-Communication
2G & 3G Mobile Communication Contents 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 3 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Overview of 2G & 3G Technology ............................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Technical Highlights of 2G & 3G .................................................................................................................. 4 2.3 Comparative Study of 2G, 3G & 4G-LTE ...................................................................................................... 5 3 Analysis of the 2G & 3G Patent Landscape ............................................................................. 7 3.1 Patent Categories & Distribution ................................................................................................................ 7 3.2 Top Patent Holders ...................................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 Analysis of Seminal Patents ......................................................................................................................... 9 3.4 Analysis of Standard-Essential Patents ..................................................................................................... 12 3.5 Patent Filing and Grant Trends ................................................................................................................. -
Recent Case Underscores Growing Divide on Treatment of Trademark Licenses in Bankruptcy Proceedings, an Issue Ripe for Supreme C
ALERT MEMORANDUM Recent Case Underscores Growing Divide on Treatment of Trademark Licenses in Bankruptcy Proceedings, an Issue Ripe for If you have any questions concerning Supreme Court Review this memorandum, please reach out to your regular firm contact or the June 7, 2018 following authors The U.S. Supreme Court will soon likely be asked to clarify NEW YORK the extent to which trademark license rights survive rejection Luke A. Barefoot +1 212 225 2829 in bankruptcy proceedings, as the lower courts are growing [email protected] increasingly divided. James L. Bromley +1 212 225 2264 On May 17, 2018, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District [email protected] Daniel Ilan of Connecticut held that a trademark licensee retains the right + 1 212 225 2415 to use licensed trademarks following a debtor-licensor’s [email protected] rejection of the license. See In re SIMA Int’l, Inc Debtor, No. Lisa M. Schweitzer +1 212 225 2629 17-21761, 2018 WL 2293705 (Bankr. D. Conn. May 17, 2018) [email protected] (“SIMA”). This decision, the most recent in a series of cases addressing the treatment of trademark licenses in bankruptcy proceedings, is consistent (in result though not necessarily in reasoning) with court decisions in the Third1 and Seventh2 Circuits, but directly conflicts with case law from the Fourth Circuit3 and with a recent First Circuit decision4, which will likely be appealed to the Supreme Court on Monday, June 11, 2018. Until the high court decides the issue, or Congress weighs in via statutory amendment, trademark licensees will face continued uncertainty on their ability to use licensed trademarks following rejection in bankruptcy. -
Downtown Alliance Scares up Halloween Specials & Events In
CONTACTS: Downtown Alliance, James Yolles (212) 835-2763 Shea Communications, George Shea, Mark Faris (212) 627-5766 Downtown Alliance Scares Up Halloween Specials & Events in Lower Manhattan -Come to Lower Manhattan for Halloween! See Dogs in Costumes, Eat Pumpkin Cupcakes- NEW YORK, Oct. 18, 2010 — Looking for fun things to do leading up to Halloween? The Downtown Alliance wants to make sure your days are filled with treats instead of tricks. So we’ve gathered up specials from shops around Lower Manhattan, along with bagsful of free and fun events. We’ll even be giving away pumpkins and pumpkin cupcakes to volunteers at our seasonal Fall Community Planting Day on Saturday, October 23rd. You can check out some of the cool stuff and special promotions going on Downtown for Halloween below, and visit http://www.downtownny.com/news?nid=335 for additional events and specials this month. Alliance for Downtown New York’s Fall Community Planting Day Bowling Green Park Saturday, October 23 10 AM to noon Free pumpkin decorating for kids, cupcakes and pumpkins (and cider, too!) to anyone who helps at the Downtown Alliance’s annual Fall Community Planting Day in Bowling Green Park. Anyone who lives in, works in or is visiting Lower Manhattan can drop by to help plant more than 4,000 tulips in the park at the tip of Broadway. It’s part of the Downtown Alliance’s Going Green Downtown initiative, which is dedicated to building an environmentally sustainable Lower Manhattan. The event is supported by the New York City Department of Parks & Recreation, Partnership for Parks, Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer, Council Member Margaret Chin, Community Board 1, Whole Foods Market and Crumbs Bake Shop. -
Complaint, Cablevision Sys. Corp. V. Viacom Int'l
Case 1:13-cv-01278-LTS Document 9 Filed 03/07/13 Page 1 of 60 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION ) and CSC HOLDINGS, LLC, ) ) Civil Action No. 13 CIV 1278 (LTS) Plaintiffs, ) (JLC) -against- ) ) COMPLAINT VIACOM INTERNATIONAL INC. and BLACK ) ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION LLC, ) REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION ) Defendants. ) ) Plaintiffs Cablevision Systems Corporation and CSC Holdings, LLC (collectively, “Cablevision”), by their attorneys Ropes & Gray LLP, bring this Complaint against Viacom International Inc. and Black Entertainment Television LLC (collectively, “Viacom”) for violations of federal and state antitrust laws, and allege as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This case involves Viacom’s abuse of its market power over access to commercially critical networks – its highly popular Nickelodeon, Comedy Central, BET, and MTV networks – to force Cablevision to license and distribute over scarce bandwidth some dozen other Viacom networks, which Viacom calls Suite Networks, that many Cablevision subscribers do not watch and for which Cablevision would prefer to substitute competing networks. Viacom strong-armed Cablevision into carrying Suite Networks by threatening to impose a near $ billion penalty if Cablevision licensed only the Viacom networks Cablevision wanted, networks Viacom calls its Core Networks. Stated differently, unless Cablevision agreed to distribute Viacom’s Suite, Cablevision would pay nearly as much for just the Core (which includes commercially critical networks) than for the Core and Suite 1 Case 1:13-cv-01278-LTS Document 9 Filed 03/07/13 Page 2 of 60 combined. Viacom’s diabolical and coercive scheme, which harms competition, consumers, and Cablevision, constitutes tying and block booking in violation of the Sherman Act and New York law. -
Sun Life Global Investments (Canada) Inc
February 22, 2019 Sun Life Global Investments (Canada) Inc. SIMPLIFIED PROSPECTUS Offering Series A, Series AT5, Series T5, Series T8, Series D, Series F, Series F5, Series F8, Series FT5, Series I and Series O securities as indicated. Sun Life Granite Conservative Portfolio (Series A, T5, F, F5, I, O securities) Sun Life Granite Moderate Portfolio (Series A, T5, F, F5, I, O securities) Sun Life Granite Balanced Portfolio (Series A, T5, D, F, F5, I, O securities) Sun Life Granite Balanced Growth Portfolio (Series A, T5, T8, F, F5, F8, I, O securities) Sun Life Granite Growth Portfolio (Series A, T5, T8, F, F5, F8, I, O securities) Sun Life Granite Income Portfolio (Series A, T5, F, F5, I, O securities) Sun Life Granite Enhanced Income Portfolio (Series A, F, I, O securities) Sun Life Sentry Value Fund (Series A, F, I, O securities) Sun Life Infrastructure Fund† (Series A, F, I, O securities) Sun Life Schroder Global Mid Cap Fund (Series A, T5, T8, F, F5, F8, I, O securities) Sun Life Dynamic American Fund (Series A, T5, T8, F, F5, F8, I, O securities) Sun Life Templeton Global Bond Fund (Series A, F, I, O securities) Sun Life Dynamic Equity Income Fund (Series A, F, I, O securities) Sun Life Dynamic Strategic Yield Fund (Series A, F, I, O securities) Sun Life NWQ Flexible Income Fund (Series A, F, I, O securities) Sun Life BlackRock Canadian Equity Fund (Series A, T5, T8, F, F5, F8, I and O securities) Sun Life BlackRock Canadian Balanced Fund (Series A, T5, F, F5, I and O securities) Sun Life MFS Canadian Bond Fund (Series A, D, F, I and O securities) Sun Life MFS Canadian Equity Growth Fund (Series A, D, F, I and O securities) Sun Life MFS Dividend Income Fund (Series A, D, F, I and O securities) Sun Life MFS U.S. -
2020 Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit (REMIC) and Widely Held Fixed Investment Trust (WHFIT) Guide
Disclosure 2020 Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit (REMIC) and Widely Held Fixed Investment Trust (WHFIT) Guide Investor’s guide to tax reporting for REMIC/WHFIT regular interests and other CDOs Highlights − This guide helps you understand the tax reporting information related to investments in a collateralized debt obligation (CDO), a debt instrument that is secured by a pool of other debt instruments. − CDOs that are secured by mortgage obligations take the form of a regular interest in a real estate mortgage investment conduit (REMIC). − Widely held fixed investment trusts (WHFITs) whose assets are mortgages, amounts received on mortgages and reasonably required reserve funds as measured by value are considered widely held mortgage trusts (WHMTs). − Taxable interest is calculated using the accrual method of accounting; therefore, the amount reported on Form 1099-INT may not equal the sum of cash payments you actually received during the year. − Original issue discount (OID) and interest accrual amounts for a REMIC regular interest or CDO are already calculated by the issuer or issuer’s agent and provided on your Consolidated Form 1099. − You may be required to use a portion of the acquisition premium to reduce OID included in income during the current year, but only with respect to the same REMIC regular interest or CDO. − If you bought your REMIC regular interest or CDO in the secondary market, you may be required to report market discount income. − If a debt instrument issued with OID was purchased with bond premium, you may eliminate the OID included in current taxable income. − The sale of a REMIC regular interest or CDO that has OID or market discount is subject to special treatment, which may decrease any capital gain or increase any capital loss. -
Sun Life Guaranteed Investment Funds (Gifs)
Sun Life Guaranteed Investment Funds (GIFs) ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA December 31, 2015 Life’s brighter under the sun Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada is a member of the Sun Life Financial group of companies. © Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, 2016. 36D-0092-02-16 Table of Contents Independent Auditors' Report 3 Sun MFS Dividend Income 196 Sun Beutel Goodman Canadian Bond 5 Sun MFS Global Growth 200 Sun BlackRock Canadian Balanced 10 Sun MFS Global Total Return 204 Sun BlackRock Canadian Composite Equity 15 Sun MFS Global Value 209 Sun BlackRock Canadian Equity 20 Sun MFS Global Value Bundle 214 Sun BlackRock Canadian Equity Bundle 25 Sun MFS International Growth 218 Sun BlackRock Cdn Composite Eq Bundle 29 Sun MFS International Growth Bundle 222 Sun BlackRock Cdn Universe Bond 33 Sun MFS International Value 226 Sun Canadian Balanced Bundle 38 Sun MFS International Value Bundle 230 Sun CI Cambridge Canadian Equity 42 Sun MFS Monthly Income 234 Sun CI Cambridge Cdn Asset Allocation 46 Sun MFS US Equity 238 Sun CI Cambridge Global Equity 50 Sun MFS US Equity Bundle 242 Sun CI Cambridge/MFS Canadian Bundle 54 Sun MFS US Growth 246 Sun CI Cambridge/MFS Global Bundle 58 Sun MFS US Value 250 Sun CI Signature Diversified Yield II 62 Sun MFS US Value Bundle 255 Sun CI Signature High Income 66 Sun Money Market 259 Sun CI Signature Income & Growth 70 Sun NWQ Flexible Income 264 Sun Daily Interest 74 Sun PH&N Short Term Bond and Mortgage 268 Sun Dollar Cost Average Daily Interest 78 Sun RBC Global High -
Instructions for Completing the Investment Information Summary (Form 8)
Financial Services 5160 Yonge Street Commission Box 85 of Ontario Toronto ON M2N 6L9 Instructions for Completing the Investment Information Summary (Form 8) General Information Who Must File Where a pension plan registered with the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) provides defined benefits, the plan administrator must file an Investment Information Summary (IIS) each year concurrently with the financial statements for the pension plan filed with FSCO. Where to Obtain the IIS Form The blank IIS form is available from the FSCO website at www.fsco.gov.on.ca, by clicking the “Forms” link at the top of the main page and then selecting “Pension Forms”. Relevant Statutes and Regulations The following statutes and their related regulations are referred to in the IIS and these instructions: • the Ontario Pension Benefits Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.8, as amended (the PBA) − Regulation 909, R.R.O. 1990, as amended (the Regulation 909) • the federal Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985, R.S.C. 1985, c. 32 (2nd supp.), as amended (the PBSA) − the Pension Benefits Standards Regulations, 1985, SOR/87-19, as amended (the Pension Benefits Standards Regulations, 1985) • the federal Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th supp.), as amended (the ITA) − the Income Tax Regulations, C.R.C., c. 945, as amended (the Income Tax Regulations) These statutes and regulations can be found on the internet either at http://www.canlii.org or at http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca and http://laws.justice.gc.ca. Hybrid DB/DC Plans Where a pension plan contains both a defined benefit (DB) component and a defined contribution (DC) component, the IIS should contain the information for the DB component only. -
Permanent University Fund Detail Schedules of Investment Securities and Independent Auditors’ Report
PERMANENT UNIVERSITY FUND DETAIL SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES AND INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT August 31, 2014 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULES The Board of Regents of The University of Texas System The Board of Directors of The University of Texas Investment Management Company We have audited the financial statements of the Permanent University Fund (the “PUF”) as of and for the years ended August 31, 2014 and 2013, and have issued our report thereon dated October 31, 2014, which contained an unmodified opinion on those financial statements. Our audits were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements as a whole. The supplemental schedules consisting of the PUF’s equity securities (Schedule A), preferred stocks (Schedule B), purchased options (Schedule C), debt securities (Schedule D), investment funds (Schedule E), physical commodities (Schedule F), cash and cash equivalents (Schedule G), hedge fund investment funds (Schedule H), and private investment funds (Schedule I) as of August 31, 2014 are presented for the purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the financial statements. These schedules are the responsibility of The University of Texas Investment Management Company and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements. Such schedules have been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in our audits of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. -
FEB 22 2002 Federal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street, S
,=V \')!\:-'T'= I"'\R tAT~ FILED ORIGINAL KRASKIN, LES'S'E & Cbs'sON, LLP ArrORNEYS AT LAW .' TELECOMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS - - . 2120 L Street, N.W., Suite 520 Telephone (202) 296-8890 Washington,D.C 20037 Telecopier (202) 296-8893 February 22, 2002 RECeIVED William F. Caton, Acting Secretary FEB 22 2002 Federal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street, S. W. Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: In the Matter 0/Access Charge Re/orm: Seventh Report and Order andFurther Notice 0/Proposed Rulemaking, CC Docket No. 96-262 AT&Tand Sprint Petitions For Declaratory Ruling Regarding the Legality 0/ Terminating or Declining Access Services Ordered or Constructively Ordered And The Requirements/or Effecting Such Termination, CCB/CPD No. 01-02; In the Matter o/Implementation o/the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act 0/1992; Development o/Competition andDiversity in Video Programming Distribution: Section 628(c)(5) o/the Communications Act; Sunset o/the Exclusive Contract Provision; CS Docket No. 01-290/ Ex Parte Meeting .,-,----..J. Dear Mr. Caton: On February 21, 2002, Rick Vergin ofChibardun Telephone Cooperative, President of the Rural Independent Competitive Alliance ("RICA"), two RICA Board members, David Schmidt ofHeart ofIowa Telephone and Gerry Anderson ofMid-Rivers Telephone Cooperative, and RICA's counsel, David Cosson and John Kuykendall ofKraskin, Lesse & Cosson, LLP, met with Kyle Dixon ofthe Office ofChairman Michael Powell to discuss issues in the above captioned matters. RICA representatives emphasized the continued refusal ofAT&T and Sprint to pay interstate access charges properly tariffed in accordance with the Commission's CLEC Access Charge Order and Declaratory Ruling and the continued refusal ofAT&T to serve the customers ofrural CLECs. -
2011 Annual Report
2011 ANNUAL REPORT INTER-AMERICAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMMISSION (CITEL) CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 2 2. ORIGIN AND STRUCTURE OF CITEL ............................................................................................ 2 2.1 OBJECTIVES AND FUNCTIONS OF CITEL.................................................................................. 2 2.2 MEMBERS AND PARTICIPANTS ................................................................................................. 4 2.3 STRUCTURE OF CITEL............................................................................................................. 5 3. ACTIVITIES OF CITEL ...................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 PERMANENT EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF CITEL.................................................................... 6 3.4 PERMANENT CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE I: TELECOMMUNICATIONS/INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICT).............................................................................................. 6 3.5 PERMANENT CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE II: RADIOCOMMUNICATION INCLUDING BROADCASTING ................................................................................................................................... -
Entity Name (BCDA) BATIBO CULTURAL and DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION 01:CONCEPT LLC 1 800 COLLECT INC
Entity Name (BCDA) BATIBO CULTURAL AND DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION 01:CONCEPT LLC 1 800 COLLECT INC. 1 CLEAR SOLUTION, LLC 10 GRANT CIRCLE LLC 10 Grant KNS LLC 1000 URBAN SCHOLARS 1001 16TH STREET LLC 1001 H ST, LLC 1001 L STREET SE, L.L.C. 1001 SE Holdings LLC 1003 RHODE ISLAND LLC 1005 E Street SE L.L.C. 1005 Rhode Island Ave NE Partners LLC 1007 Irving Street NE Partners LLC 1007-1009 H STREET, NE LLC 100TH BOMB GROUP FOUNDATION INC. 101 5th Street NE LLC 101 CONSTITUTION Trust 101 WAYNE LLC 1010 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION 1010 V LLC 1011 Otis Place L.L.C. 1011 Otis Place NW LLC 1012 9th St. Builders LLC 1015 Euclid Street NW LLC 1015 U STREET LLC 1016 16TH STREET CONDOMINIUM LLC 1016 7TH STREET LLC 1019 VENTURES LLC 102 MILITARY ROAD LLC 1020 45th St. LLC 1021 48TH ST NE LLC 1022 47TH STREET LLC 1026 45th St. LLC 1030 TAUSSIG PLACE, LLC 1030 W. 15TH LLC 1033 BLADENSBURG ROAD, NE LLC 1035 48th Street LLC 104 13TH STREET LLC 104 Kennedy Street LLC 1042 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LLP 105 35th Street N.E. LLC 1061 INN, LLC 107 LLC 1070 THOMAS JEFFERSON ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1075 KENILWORTH AVENUE LLC 1085805 SE LLC 1090 Vermont LLC 1090 VERMONT AVENUE GP LLC 109-187 35TH STREET N.E. BENEFICIARY LLC 109-187 35TH STREET N.E. TRUSTEE LLC 10TH & M STREET CONDOMINIUMS LLC 10th Street Parking Cooperative Association, Inc. 1100 21ST STREET ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1100 FIRST INC.