DOCSLIB.ORG

2G-Amp-3G-Mobile-Communication

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2G-Amp-3G-Mobile-Communication 2G & 3G Mobile Communication Contents 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 3 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Overview of 2G & 3G Technology ............................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Technical Highlights of 2G & 3G .................................................................................................................. 4 2.3 Comparative Study of 2G, 3G & 4G-LTE ...................................................................................................... 5 3 Analysis of the 2G & 3G Patent Landscape ............................................................................. 7 3.1 Patent Categories & Distribution ................................................................................................................ 7 3.2 Top Patent Holders ...................................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 Analysis of Seminal Patents ......................................................................................................................... 9 3.4 Analysis of Standard-Essential Patents ..................................................................................................... 12 3.5 Patent Filing and Grant Trends .................................................................................................................. 14 4 Key Players in the 2G & 3G Patent Landscape ...................................................................... 15 4.1 Ericsson ...................................................................................................................................................... 15 4.2 Nokia .......................................................................................................................................................... 16 4.3 Qualcomm ................................................................................................................................................. 17 4.4 Alcatel-Lucent ............................................................................................................................................ 18 4.5 Samsung .................................................................................................................................................... 19 5 Monetization of 2G & 3G Patents ......................................................................................... 20 5.1 Potential Licensing & Litigation of 2G & 3G Patents ................................................................................. 21 6 Glossary of Terms .................................................................................................................. 24 © iRunway 2013 Confidential Page 2 of 26 2G & 3G Mobile Communication 1 Executive Summary Emerging technologies such as 4G-LTE attract the lion‟s share of industry and media attention. However, 2G and 3G wireless networks remain highly relevant, currently supporting over 80% of all mobile phone activity. Trends suggest the use of 2G and 3G technologies will expand dramatically during the next three to five years as the world‟s two largest markets, India and China, open their doors wide to mobile phone usage. Ericsson, Nokia, Qualcomm and Alcatel-Lucent are among those who developed the building blocks of today‟s wireless world. They collectively control the majority of all patents in this space. Nokia, LG Electronics and Qualcomm alone own more than 43 percent of all “seminal” patents (i.e., determined to be strong based on a set of parameters). The playing field has evolved dramatically in recent years, causing these brands to slowly fade from the minds of consumers. However, they will continue to exert an influence on current market leaders such as Apple, Google and Samsung, who control today‟s mobile device ecosystem. 2G and 3G technology patents have been at the center of ongoing patent wars and they can be expected to fuel a significant escalation in activity during the next five years as top patent holders seek to monetize their portfolios. Leading patent holders have already launched initiatives against major competitors, with some having sold patent rights to various companies. It is highly likely, given the increasing pressure on these companies to generate revenue, that many will become more aggressive by entering into new agreements with “patent privateers” to monetize their assets. The result will likely be an increase in litigation and licensing. So, who stands to benefit in this evolving marketplace? Which companies control the largest number of patents and the largest number of seminal patents in the world of 2G and 3G technologies? Which companies are best positioned to leverage monetization efforts? These are some of the questions addressed in this report. We explore key 2G and 3G patent holders, providing details on the number and category of overall, standard-essential and seminal patents. The report delves into companies that control a large percentage of seminal and standard-essential patents. Nearly nine percent of seminal 2G and 3G patents are currently held by certain companies, and approximately five percent of all standard-essential patents are held by two companies - Innovative Sonic Ltd. and Vringo Infrastructure Inc. This report also reveals that these companies that hold key 2G and 3G patents have remarkably high patent monetization potential. © iRunway 2013 Confidential Page 3 of 26 2G & 3G Mobile Communication 2 Introduction 2.1 Overview of 2G & 3G Technology 2G was commercially launched in 1991. It introduced digital signaling via packet data in telecommunications, and provided reduced power consumption and noise levels. It also proposed better security methods with digital encryption techniques coupled with lower power usage. SMS, MMS and e-mail were a few packet-based services introduced by 2G. Although highly advanced markets have reached a stage where 2G networks are now being switched off, 2G technologies still account for over 80 percent of connections in China and 90 percent in India - the two largest mobile markets in the world. With successive technologies such as 2.5G, 2.75G and 3G, the era of ever-increasing data rate demands skyrocketed across the globe. While packet data was introduced in 2G, higher data rates and better data services were brought by 3G. Attractive services such as Mobile TV, Video on Demand, Video Conferencing, Location-Based Services and Global Positioning System (GPS) gradually grew into a necessity for a majority of mobile users. Statistics1 suggest that, as of 2012, more than 500 operators across 185 countries have deployed 3G networks, pointing to the fact that mobile users in more than three-quarters of the world‟s markets have access to 3G services. 2.2 Technical Highlights of 2G & 3G The 2G Advantage Lower power consumption, better security and better bandwidth usage are the key advantages of 2G over its precedent technologies. 2G introduced digital encoding in telecommunications, resulting in better compression and multiplexing of voice data than its preceding analog encoding. The advantage: 2G supported a larger number of calls in the same radio bandwidth and ensured lower power consumption that improved battery life in mobile phones. Digital encryption methods introduced in 2G provided better security and privacy to mobile users. Short Message Service (SMS) and Multimedia Message Service (MMS) became the first form of packet-based services introduced in 2G, marking the beginning of data services on mobile phones. 1 https://gsmaintelligence.com/analysis/2012/11/half-of-all-mobile-connections-running-on-3g-4g-networks-by- 2017/359/ © iRunway 2013 Confidential Page 4 of 26 2G & 3G Mobile Communication The 3G Advantage 3G entered the market with the advantage of increased data rates available to mobile users for services such as Mobile TV, Location-Based Services, video calls and internet browsing on the move. It also provides variable data transfer speeds ranging from 128 kbps to 3 mbps depending on the speed with which the mobile device is moving within the network. Beyond mobile telephony, the higher speeds allowed 3G connections in PCs, gaming consoles, tablets and any other portable device that could benefit from a faster and higher- quality internet connection. 3G also provides users with better security through user authentication capabilities when communicating with other wireless devices. 3G boasts of better power control methods for both uplink and downlink, with the network using a target Signal-to-Interference Ratio (SIR) to adjust its output power. It also improves spectrum utilization through shared channels in the radio interface, thus making it more effective than 2G networks. 2.3 Comparative Study of 2G, 3G & 4G-LTE 2G 3G 4G-LTE Term „mobile Data services such as broadband‟ introduced text messaging because of its speed & Services (SMS), multimedia High definition capability. Introduced messaging (MMS), streaming & IPV6 support. Universal access & internet access & SIM portability across cards. different device types. Throughput/ 3.1 Mbps (peak)/ 100-300 Mbps (peak)/ 9.6/14.4 Kbps. Speed 500-700 Kbps. 3-5 Mbps. E-UTRA (Evolved UMTS GSM - Global System Terrestrial Radio Access) for Mobile
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SEC Rule 15C2-11Restricted Securities
    SEC Rule 15c2-11Restricted Securities On September 28, 2021, new amendments to Rule 15c-211 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 go into effect to enhance investor protection and improve issuer transparency. These amendments restrict the ability of market makers to publish quotations for those companies that have not made required current financial and company information available to regulators and investors. Ahead of the regulatory enforcement date, TD Ameritrade will only accept orders to liquidate positions - (i.e. no new buy orders) starting on or after September 3, 2021. Please note: After the amendment officially goes into effect on September 28, 2021, it may be more difficult to liquidate these securities. Quoting and market liquidity may also be very limited. The list is below as of September 20, 2021 and is subject to change at any time. Symbol Cusip Company Name AACS 025199100 American Commerce Solutions, Inc. AAIIQ 01023E100 Alabama Aircraft Industries, Inc. AASL 03063J205 America's Suppliers, Inc. ABBY 00287T308 Abby, Inc. ABDR 022909204 Ambassador Food Services Corp. ABKB 02451T106 American Basketball Association, Inc. ABPR 00927Q102 Airborne Security & Protective Services, Inc. ABVN 00083Q102 ABV Consulting Inc. ABWN 00928L300 Airborne Wireless Network ACBCQ 013288105 Albina Community Bancorp ACCA 00389L104 Acacia Diversified Holdings, Inc. ACFL 001642107 AMC Financial Holdings, Inc. ACGI 022624100 Amacore Group, Inc. (The) ACLD 004901104 Acquire Ltd. ACNE 016096109 Alice Consolidated Mines, Inc. ACNV 00434W105 Accelera Innovations, Inc. ACRB 04521A109 Asia Carbon Industries, Inc. ACTL 04300F105 Artec Global Media, Inc. ACUS 00511R854 Acusphere, Inc. ADCV 00512R200 AD Capital U.S., Inc. ADDC 006698203 Addmaster Corp. ADFS 025351107 American Defense Systems, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Annual Report
    2011 ANNUAL REPORT INTER-AMERICAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMMISSION (CITEL) CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 2 2. ORIGIN AND STRUCTURE OF CITEL ............................................................................................ 2 2.1 OBJECTIVES AND FUNCTIONS OF CITEL.................................................................................. 2 2.2 MEMBERS AND PARTICIPANTS ................................................................................................. 4 2.3 STRUCTURE OF CITEL............................................................................................................. 5 3. ACTIVITIES OF CITEL ...................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 PERMANENT EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF CITEL.................................................................... 6 3.4 PERMANENT CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE I: TELECOMMUNICATIONS/INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICT).............................................................................................. 6 3.5 PERMANENT CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE II: RADIOCOMMUNICATION INCLUDING BROADCASTING ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Entity Name (BCDA) BATIBO CULTURAL and DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION 01:CONCEPT LLC 1 800 COLLECT INC
    Entity Name (BCDA) BATIBO CULTURAL AND DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION 01:CONCEPT LLC 1 800 COLLECT INC. 1 CLEAR SOLUTION, LLC 10 GRANT CIRCLE LLC 10 Grant KNS LLC 1000 URBAN SCHOLARS 1001 16TH STREET LLC 1001 H ST, LLC 1001 L STREET SE, L.L.C. 1001 SE Holdings LLC 1003 RHODE ISLAND LLC 1005 E Street SE L.L.C. 1005 Rhode Island Ave NE Partners LLC 1007 Irving Street NE Partners LLC 1007-1009 H STREET, NE LLC 100TH BOMB GROUP FOUNDATION INC. 101 5th Street NE LLC 101 CONSTITUTION Trust 101 WAYNE LLC 1010 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION 1010 V LLC 1011 Otis Place L.L.C. 1011 Otis Place NW LLC 1012 9th St. Builders LLC 1015 Euclid Street NW LLC 1015 U STREET LLC 1016 16TH STREET CONDOMINIUM LLC 1016 7TH STREET LLC 1019 VENTURES LLC 102 MILITARY ROAD LLC 1020 45th St. LLC 1021 48TH ST NE LLC 1022 47TH STREET LLC 1026 45th St. LLC 1030 TAUSSIG PLACE, LLC 1030 W. 15TH LLC 1033 BLADENSBURG ROAD, NE LLC 1035 48th Street LLC 104 13TH STREET LLC 104 Kennedy Street LLC 1042 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LLP 105 35th Street N.E. LLC 1061 INN, LLC 107 LLC 1070 THOMAS JEFFERSON ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1075 KENILWORTH AVENUE LLC 1085805 SE LLC 1090 Vermont LLC 1090 VERMONT AVENUE GP LLC 109-187 35TH STREET N.E. BENEFICIARY LLC 109-187 35TH STREET N.E. TRUSTEE LLC 10TH & M STREET CONDOMINIUMS LLC 10th Street Parking Cooperative Association, Inc. 1100 21ST STREET ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1100 FIRST INC.
    [Show full text]
  • MEMBER COMPANIES Patents 2 Trademarks MEMBER COMPANIES Copyrights Related Litigation
    1 MEMBER COMPANIES Patents 2 Trademarks MEMBER COMPANIES Copyrights Related Litigation A Good Idea Is Worth Protecting. Seed IP is a proud member of WTIA. Seed IP Law Group provides Custom Crafted Intellectual Property Solutions™ to clients pursuing patents, trademarks, copyrights, and other IP protection. With expertise across the technology spectrum, including electrical engineering, biotechnology, computer science, and mechanical engineering, Seed IP helps clients patent their valuable inventions. You, too, can rely on Seed IP’s team of engineers and scientists to understand both your technology and its business application. 206.622.4900 www.SeedIP.com 701 Fifth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104 Patents Trademarks 3 MEMBER COMPANIES Copyrights Related Litigation A Good Idea Is Worth Protecting. Seed IP is a proud member of WTIA. Seed IP Law Group provides Custom Crafted Intellectual Property Solutions™ to clients pursuing patents, trademarks, copyrights, and other IP protection. With expertise across the technology spectrum, including electrical engineering, biotechnology, computer science, and mechanical engineering, Seed IP helps clients patent their valuable inventions. You, too, can rely on Seed IP’s team of engineers and scientists to understand both your technology and its business application. 206.622.4900 www.SeedIP.com 701 Fifth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104 4 MEMBER COMPANIES Table of Contents 07 MISSION & VISION 14 PRESIDENT’S CLUB 08 2019 IMPACT STATS 17 HISTORY OF WTIA 09 LETTER FROM THE CEO 19 MEMBER COMPANIES 10 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 65 PRODUCT INDEX 5 MEMBER COMPANIES RESERVE FOR FULL PAGE AD (11”W x 9”H) 6 MEMBER COMPANIES 7 MISSION & VISION About WTIA Think of us as the industry’s problem solver: We combine the power of our member companies to solve problems they can’t easily solve on their own.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 Applications of NEW DBSD SATELLITE SERVICES G.P., IB Docket No. 11-149 DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION; AND TERRESTAR LICENSE INC., DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION; Request for Rule Waivers and Modified Ancillary Terrestrial Component Authority. Applications of DBSD NORTH AMERICA, INC., DEBTOR-IN- IB Docket No. 11-150 POSSESSION; NEW DBSD SATELLITE SERVICES G.P., DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION; PENDRELL CORPORATION; AND TERRESTAR NETWORKS INC., DEBTOR-IN- POSSESSION; AND TERRESTAR LICENSE INC., DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION; AND DISH NETWORK CORPORATION AND GAMMA ACQUISITION L.L.C.; Request to Acquire Control of Licenses and Authorizations. CONSOLIDATED OPPOSITION TO PETITIONS TO DENY AND RESPONSE TO COMMENTS October 27, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ............................................................................. 1 II. GRANT OF THE WAIVERS SERVES THE PUBLIC INTEREST, WHILE WAITING FOR RULEMAKINGS WOULD DISSERVE IT ...................................... 6 A. The Record Reflects Broad Agreement on the Benefits of 2 GHz MSS Spectrum for Mobile Broadband ........................................................................ 6 B. The Commission Should Reject Calls for Delaying New Mobile Broadband Entry..................................................................................................................... 10 C. Waivers Are the Decidedly Superior Procedural Route ................................. 11 D. The Applicants’ Proposals Do Not Stand in the Way of Incentive Auctions 18 E. The Proposed Waivers Do Not Affect the Interference Limits ....................... 18 III. THE WAIVER REQUESTS SHOULD BE GRANTED ON THEIR MERITS ....... 22 A. Limited Waiver of the Integrated Service Rule Will Promote a Robust MSS Service and Not Undermine the Ancillary Nature of the Terrestrial Service 23 B. Waiver of the ATC Technical Rules and Spare Satellite Rule Will Promote Investment in MSS and Enhance Utilization of the Band ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Ninth Annual Report 2014-15 Contents
    Tata Communications Limited TWENTY NINTH ANNUAL REPORT 2014-15 CONTENTS Corporate Details ................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Notice ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Directors’ Report ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Management Discussion and Analysis ........................................................................................................................................... 38 Report on Corporate Governance .................................................................................................................................................... 52 Declaration regarding Company’s Code of Conduct ................................................................................................................ 69 Auditors’ Certificate on Corporate Governanvce ........................................................................................................................ 69 Secretarial Audit Report ......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RPX Q4 2015 Public PAE Report
    Q4 2015 Public PAE Report Table of Contents Introduction 3 Key Findings 4 Methodology 5 Market Data 7 Financial Data 12 Patent Transactions 22 Litigation Data 28 Profiles 35 About RPX 46 Introduction Publicly traded patent assertion entities (“PAEs”) Over the past four quarters alone, the public PAEs detailed in this report have raised over $725 million in the debt and equity markets while spending more than $141 are a relatively recent phenomenon. Over the past million on 16 patent portfolios. The acquired patents, which relate to a variety of sectors, will likely be enforced by the PAEs. few years, the proliferation of public PAEs has Even with all of this activity, the public PAE industry is still considered too niche to have cast some light on the ways in which PAEs seek widespread, comprehensive coverage by sell-side equity analysts who independently research and analyze companies to generate investment recommendations. The dearth to earn revenue based on their primary factors of insight into these companies has enabled a contingent of speculators and day traders who opine—often incorrectly—on what legal developments will mean for the of production—capital and patents. prospects of future settlements or revenue for these companies. In addition to the lack of sell-side coverage of PAEs, the art of analyzing public equity markets and SEC filings is generally not a core strength of many IP professionals, putting them at a disadvantage when encountering public PAEs as counterparties in patent transactions and/or as potential courtroom adversaries. Since its inception in 2008, RPX has striven to increase transparency in the patent markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Companies That Do Not Exploit Animals ©2019 Crueltyfreeinvesting.Org Title Stock Exchange Stock Symbol Animal Usage 1347 Property Insurance Holdings, Inc
    Companies That Do Not Exploit Animals ©2019 CrueltyFreeInvesting.org Title Stock Exchange Stock Symbol Animal Usage 1347 Property Insurance Holdings, Inc. NASDAQ PIH No Animal Exploitation 1st Constitution Bancorp (NJ) NASDAQ FCCY No Animal Exploitation 1st Source Corporation NASDAQ SRCE No Animal Exploitation 21Vianet Group, Inc. NASDAQ VNET No Animal Exploitation 2U, Inc. NASDAQ TWOU No Animal Exploitation 3D Systems Corporation NYSE DDD No Animal Exploitation 51job, Inc. NASDAQ JOBS No Animal Exploitation 58.com Inc. NYSE WUBA No Animal Exploitation 8point3 Energy Partners LP NASDAQ CAFD No Animal Exploitation 8x8 Inc NASDAQ EGHT No Animal Exploitation A V Homes, Inc. NASDAQ AVHI No Animal Exploitation A.H. Belo Corporation NYSE AHC No Animal Exploitation A10 Networks, Inc. NYSE ATEN No Animal Exploitation AAC Holdings, Inc. NYSE AAC No Animal Exploitation AAON, Inc. NASDAQ AAON No Animal Exploitation AAR Corp. NYSE AIR No Animal Exploitation Aaron's, Inc. NYSE AAN No Animal Exploitation Ability Inc. NASDAQ ABIL No Animal Exploitation ABM Industries Incorporated NYSE ABM No Animal Exploitation Abraxas Petroleum Corporation NASDAQ AXAS No Animal Exploitation Acacia Communications, Inc. NASDAQ ACIA No Animal Exploitation Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. NASDAQ ACHC No Animal Exploitation Acadia Realty Trust NYSE AKR No Animal Exploitation B Communications Ltd. NASDAQ BCOM No Animal Exploitation B. Riley Financial, Inc. NASDAQ RILY No Animal Exploitation B.O.S. Better Online Solutions NASDAQ BOSC No Animal Exploitation B/E Aerospace, Inc. NASDAQ BEAV No Animal Exploitation B2Gold Corp AMEX BTG No Animal Exploitation Babcock NYSE BW No Animal Exploitation Badger Meter, Inc. NYSE BMI No Animal Exploitation Baidu, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 1-800 Flowers.Com, Inc
    FLWS 1-800 Flowers.Com, Inc. - Class A Common Stock FCOB 1St Colonial Bancorp Inc FNRC 1St Nrg Corp TDCH 30Dc Inc TSIOF 361 Degrees Intl Ltd TDEY 3D Eye Solutions Inc DPSM 3D Pioneer Systems Inc DDD 3D Systems Corporation Common Stock TDCP 3Dicon Corp DDDX 3Dx Industries Inc MMM 3M Company Common Stock PSPW 3Power Energy Group Inc CATV 4Cable Tv Intl Inc FOUR 4Licensing Corp BARZ 5Barz International Inc RNWR 808 Renewable Energy Corp EIHDF 888 Holdings Plc Ord EGHT 8X8 Inc - Common Stock DRWN A Clean Slate Inc SHLM A. Schulman, Inc. - Common Stock AOS A.O. Smith Corporation Common Stock AMKBY A.P Moller-Mrs Uns/Adr AEMMY A2A Spa Unsp/Adr AACAY Aac Techs Hldgs Unsp/Adr ELUXY Ab Electrolux B S/Adr RJA Ab Svensk Ekportkredit (Swedish Export Credit Corporation) Elements Linked To The Rogers International Commodity Index - Agriculture Total Return Structured Product ABCFF Abacus Mining & Expl Corp ABKI Abakan Inc ATTBF Abattis Bioceuticals Ord ABB Abb Ltd Common Stock ABLZF Abb Ltd Zuerich ABT Abbott Laboratories Common Stock ABBV Abbvie Inc. Common Stock ABBY Abby Inc ABCZY Abcam Plc Adr AGOAF Abengoa Sa Abg/Ac B ABGOF Abengoa Sa Ord ABGB Abengoa, S.A. - American Depositary Shares ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Company Common Stock ABBAF Aberdeen Asian Income Fun ABDNY Aberdeen Asset Mgmt Adr IAF Aberdeen Australia Equity Fund Inc Common Stock GCH Aberdeen Greater China Fund, Inc. Common Stock IF Aberdeen Indonesia Fund, Inc. (Common Stock ABMD Abiomed, Inc. - Common Stock ABOT Abot Mining Co Ida Cap ABHD Abtech Holdings Inc ACCA Acacia Diversified Hldgs ACTG Acacia Research Corporation - Common Stock AKR Acadia Realty Trust Common Stock AXDX Accelerate Diagnostics, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Performance and Price-Earnings Ratios: Basu 1977 Revisited
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies 8-2013 Investment Performance and Price-Earnings Ratios: Basu 1977 Revisited Richard John Criddle Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports Part of the Business Commons Recommended Citation Criddle, Richard John, "Investment Performance and Price-Earnings Ratios: Basu 1977 Revisited" (2013). All Graduate Plan B and other Reports. 326. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports/326 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Plan B and other Reports by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE AND PRICE-EARNINGS RATIOS: BASU 1977 REVISITED by 2LT Richard John Criddle A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Financial Economics UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2013 2 CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ……………………………………………………………. 4 INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 LITERATURE REVIEW ………………………………………………………………………… 6 DATA OVERVIEW ……………………………………………………………………………….. 13 METHODOLOGY ………………………………………………………………………………… 21 RESULTS …………………………………………………………………………………………… 27 CONCLUSION …………………………………………………………………………………….. 33 REFERENCES …………………………………………………………………………………….. 34 APPENDIX I
    [Show full text]
  • Proxy Voting Fact Sheet PV-V3N3 | JULY 2014
    Proxy Voting Fact Sheet PV-V3N3 | JULY 2014 HIGHLIGHTS • The volume of social/environmental proposals surged, • Proposals seeking to require equity retention periods driven primarily by proposals related to political spending and to prevent acceleration of vesting of equity awards and lobbying, as well as proposals related to climate upon a change in control were the most frequently voted change, sustainability reporting, and human rights. compensation-related topics during the period. • High numbers of proposals seeking changes in corporate • The overall volume of shareholder proposals submitted governance practices, such as separation of the chair/ during the first half of the year is nearly flat compared with CEO roles, board declassification, majority voting in the same period in 2013, although the number of Russell director elections, and to allow (or ease an existing 3000 companies that held meetings was slightly higher, requirement for) action by written consent reflect efforts suggesting that engagement efforts are paying off. to push governance practices adopted by most large-cap • Average support for say-on-pay votes is high and companies down to mid- and small-cap companies. consistent with prior years. However, the failed votes • Five proxy access proposals won majority support, while during four years of SOP demonstrate that companies four others received support of more than 40 percent of with high votes can’t assume they’ll get overwhelming votes cast. support the next year, especially if they had poor stock performance or made changes to their pay plans that could be viewed as problematic by investors or proxy advisors. Chart 1 Shareholder Meetings—by Index 1,395 The number of meetings in the Russell 3000 for the first half of the year was slightly Number of meetings higher than in 2013 (2,503 versus 2,442), while S&P 500 (N=441) it was flat for the S&P 500 (441 versus 440).
    [Show full text]
  • CCIA, DISH Waiver Request, Reply Comments, IB Docket 11-149, 11.3.2011.Pdf
    Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of New DBSD Satellite Service G.P., Debtor- IB Docket No. 11-149 in-Possession, and TerreStar Licensee Inc., Debtor-in-Possession, Request for Rule Waivers and Modified Ancillary Terrestrial Component Authority REPLY COMMENTS OF THE COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION (CCIA) Edward J. Black Catherine R. Sloan Phillip A. Berenbroick CCIA 900 17th Street, N.W. Suite 1100 Washington, D.C. 20006 Tel. (202) 783-0070 Facsimile (202) 783-0534 Email: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Dated: November 3, 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DISH Network seeks to acquire New DBSD Satellite Services G.P. and TerreStar License Inc. and has requested Rule Waivers and Modified Ancillary Terrestrial Component Authority so that it can launch a nationwide, satellite-terrestrial mobile broadband network using 40 MHz of the 2 GHz MSS spectrum. Once operational, DISH’s network has the potential to create much needed competition in the highly concentrated wireless broadband market. Additionally, DISH’s network will efficiently use underutilized spectrum to expand the amount of spectrum available for mobile broadband, helping the Commission meet one of the goals of the National Broadband Plan. CCIA and other parties support DISH’s efforts and ask the Commission to move without delay to grant the Applicants’ Request. The Commission should not delay its grant of the Applicants’ Request. Delay by the Commission will only postpone, and potentially foreclose DISH’s entry into the wireless broadband market and disserve the public interest by preventing meaningful competition and its potential to benefit consumers through lower prices and greater innovation.
    [Show full text]