02/00866/Min Waste Management Facility

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

02/00866/Min Waste Management Facility 02/00866/MIN WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY INCLUDING MATERIALS RECOVERY, COMPOSTING , BIOLOGICAL WASTE TREATMENT, ENERGY RECOVERY, CONTINUED LANDFILL AND ASSOCIATED CLAY EXTRACTION, ACCESS ROAD, VISITOR CENTRE, CAR PARKING, RAIL ACCESS, RAIL SIDINGS, RAIL RECEPTION AREA, RAIL CONTAINER LOADING AND UNLOADING PLANT AND RAIL CONTAINER STORAGE AREA AT Bletchley Landfill Site, Bletchley Road, Newton Longville FOR Shanks Waste Services Limited The Proposal Planning permission is being sought for an Integrated Waste Management Facility to be sited at Bletchley Landfill Site. The proposal includes facilities for materials recovery from waste, buildings for composting and other biological treatment, plant for the recovery of energy from residential waste through thermal treatment, a research and development complex, a visitor centre, continued landfill and associated day working, a new road access connecting to the Stoke Hammond bypass when constructed, offices and car parking, a new rail access and rail reception area comprising a rail spur from the Bletchley to Oxford line, rail sidings and an associated area for container loading, unloading and storage. The Application Site The application site extends to 155 hectares as the development site includes the existing landfill site. The final landform of the landfill site would be altered from that recently given planning permission to enable the proposed waste management facility to be sited at the lowered ground level within the former brick clay pit. The application site straddles the boundary of this authority and Buckinghamshire County Council. The parts of the application comprising the composting facility, the rail reception area and the southern part of the new access road would, therefore, fall to Buckinghamshire County Council to determine. The majority of the built development would be located in the North Eastern corner of the landfill site. It would be bounded on its eastern edge by the Blue Lagoon country park and to the north by the fields which lie between the existing landfill site and the Oxford to Bletchley Railway line. At the western end of the application site the boundary is extended northwards to include some of the field adjacent to the railway line and the former brickworks site to accommodate the proposed railway sidings and the area for container loading and unloading and storage. The remaining landfill area to the south and west of the proposed development would continue until restored to fields and woodlands principally for nature conservation purposes. A new vehicular access consented with the planning permission for the recontouring of the landfill site would run parallel to the west coast main line to link the proposed development with the Stoke Hammond bypass when this is developed. Vehicular access (up to 750 deliveries per day) would be via this access. Residential areas, including schools, are located beyond the field to the north of the area where the majority of built development is proposed to be located and beyond the Blue Lagoon, the west coast mainline and Drayton Road to the east. Residential properties lie immediately beyond the railway line at the point at which the railway sidings and associated development would be located to the north. At this point the nearest residential property would be approximately 40 metres from the proposed railway siding junction. The nearest residential property would be 345 metres from the main development area. The fluidised bed energy recovery plant would be 645 metres from the nearest residential property. Development Details The most prominent part of the development is the fluidised bed energy recovery plant. Within this building the residual waste, following materials recovery and bio-drying would be burned. Energy would be recovered in the form of electricity generated within the building, and the heat itself which could be used within development scheduled to take place in the vicinity. This Energy from Waste building would be 63 metres tall and have two chimney stacks reaching 103 metres. It would, however, be located approximately 15 metres below the original ground level within the former brick clay pit. This building would cover a ground area of 8380 square metres. The building is of curvilinear form with the footprint being a series of ellipses and oblongs with the roofline being a series of compound and symmetrical curves. The building would be clad in metal panelling with lowered sections at the eaves and southern end of the building in plastic coated sheet metal coloured blue/green. To the north of this building would be a line of 5 Bio-materials recycling buildings each covering an area of 2,835 square metres. These would be approximately 15 metres high and clad in sheet steel/aluminium. These would have shallow pitched eaves and be of a general industrial/commercial appearance. These would be linked to the fluid bed energy recovery building by conveyors. To the east of the bio-mrf buildings would be five similar buildings, but of varying sizes which would accommodate segregated materials recovery (3940 sq. metres), a maintenance workshop and store (1,180 sq. metres), a staff welfare facility (675 sq. metres), mixed materials recovery (3,940 sq. metres) and an early landfill store (3,660 sq. metres). To the west of the fluid bed energy recovery building two further buildings, similar to those housing the bio-mrfs, are proposed. These would provide for a research centre (1,405 sq. metres) and an ash conditioning unit (2,700). A compound is proposed between these two buildings. Free standing air coolers associated with the fluid bed energy facility would be located to the east of the main building. The complex would be landscaped with areas containing grass, shrubs and trees and a linear water feature running the length of the southern boundary of the complex. A building containing a visitor centre would be located between the waste processing complex and the site entrance. This building would contain a lecture theatre, seminar room and offices. This building would reflect the main building with part of its roof structure having a curvilinear form. It would also feature a round tower and flat metal panelling. The proposed rail reception area includes a hall with a ground area of 2,800 sq. metres to contain the composting clamps , a chipping shredding building of 300 sq. metres and a compost bagging building of 240 sq. metres. The larger building would be 12 metres high, the two smaller buildings, 8.5 metres. The rail reception/composting area would be linked to the main compound by a site haul road which would run along the northern boundary of the landfill site. An acoustic bund would be provided to screen vehicular noise substituted by a fence where space is limited. The final length of the road would run through a tunnel. Planning Policy National Planning Policy Guidance Note 23 : Planning and Pollution Control (July 1994) PPG 23 details those matters which are to be considered by Waste Planning Authorities and those which are the responsibility of the Environment Agency. It aims to prevent unnecessary duplication of the controls emphasising that waste planning authorities should assume that pollution prevention will be adequately dealt with through the waste licencing system operated by the Environment Agency. It does, however, specify that it is the function of the waste planning authority to determine the most appropriate locations for waste facilities taking account of the surrounding land uses. Planning Policy Guidance Note 10 Planning and Waste Management (Sept 1999) PPG10 replaced parts of PPG23 providing advice on how the land-use system should contribute to sustainable waste management. In particular, it emphasises that waste disposal methods should represent the Best Practical Environmental Option. Local Buckinghamshire County Structure Plan 1991-2011 remains the strategic planning policy document for the Milton Keynes area. It contains a number of policies relevant to the proposal. Policy WM1 supports the establishment of recycling and associated facilities in locations where there would be no significant adverse impact on the environment. Policy WM3 seeks to ensure the provision of adequate capacity for the safe disposal of waste arising in Buckinghamshire. It refers to the accommodation of a proportion of waste disposal requirements originating from outside of the County. Policy WM4 generally supports the filling of voids created by mineral extraction with waste where this enables the land to be returned to an appropriate after use. Policy T12 encourages the local planning authorities: (i) To seek to use rail for the carriage of freight. (ii) To site suitable new industries in growth areas next to railway lines to which sidings could connect. (iii) To consider favourable the establishment of rail freight depots. (iv) To favour developments which would maximise the use of rail rather than those that would use road access, as long as there would be no conflict with any other structure plan policy. Policy EN2 supports proposals for the generation of energy from renewable resources as long as there is no conflict with other structure plan policies and no adverse environmental impact on nearby communities. The policy specifically refers to proposals for the incineration of waste materials as an example of such an energy project. Policy P1 states that planning permission should be withheld from potentially polluting developments which would pose unacceptable risks to other land uses.
Recommended publications
  • Bedfordshire and Its Boundaries with Buckinghamshire and Cambridge- Shire
    CoPV ort No. 566 B evtew_oiJNpn-Metropol itan Counties COUNTY OF BEDFORDSHR AND ITS BOUNDARIES WITH : BUCKINGHAMSH R t AND CAMBRIDGESHIR LOCAL GOVERNlfEST BOUNDARY COMMISSION f'OIt ENGLAND REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell CBE PRICS FSVA Members Professor G E Cherry BA FRTPI PRICE Mr K F J Ennals CB Mr G R Prentice Mrs H R V Sarkany Mr B Scholes OBE THE RT HON NICHOLAS RIDLEY MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF NON METROPOLITAN COUNTIES THE COUNTY OF BEDFORDSHIRE AND ITS BOUNDARIES WITH BUCKINGHAMSHIRE AND CAMBRIDGE- SHIRE COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT AND PROPOSALS INTRODUCTION 1. On 26 July 1985 we wrote to Bedfordshire County Council announcing our intention to undertake a review of the County under section 48{1) of the Local Government Act 1972. Copies of the letter were sent to the principal local authorities, and parishes, in Bedfordshire and in the surrounding counties of Buckinghamshire, Cambridgeshire, Hertfordshire and Northamptonshire; to the National and County Associations of Local Councils; to the Members of Parliament with constituency interests and to the headquarters of the main political parties. In addition, copies were sent to those government departments, regional health authorities, water authorities, and electricity and gas boards which might have an interest, as well as to British Telecom, the English Tourist Board, the local government press and to local television and radio stations serving the area. 2. The County Councils were requested, in co-operation as necessary with the other local authorities, to assist us in publicising the start of the review by inserting a notice for two successive weeks in local newspapers so as to give a wide coverage in the areas concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Proposals for New Parliamentary Constituency Boundaries in the South East Region Contents
    Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the South East region Contents Summary 3 1 What is the Boundary Commission for England? 5 2 Background to the 2018 Review 7 3 Initial proposals for the South East region 11 Initial proposals for the Berkshire sub-region 12 Initial proposals for the Brighton and Hove, East Sussex, 13 Kent, and Medway sub-region Initial proposals for the West Sussex sub-region 16 Initial proposals for the Buckinghamshire 17 and Milton Keynes sub-region Initial proposals for the Hampshire, Portsmouth 18 and Southampton sub-region Initial proposals for the Isle of Wight sub-region 20 Initial proposals for the Oxfordshire sub-region 20 Initial proposals for the Surrey sub-region 21 4 How to have your say 23 Annex A: Initial proposals for constituencies, 27 including wards and electorates Glossary 53 Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the South East region 1 Summary Who we are and what we do Our proposals leave 15 of the 84 existing constituencies unchanged. We propose The Boundary Commission for England only minor changes to a further 47 is an independent and impartial constituencies, with two wards or fewer non -departmental public body which is altered from the existing constituencies. responsible for reviewing Parliamentary constituency boundaries in England. The rules that we work to state that we must allocate two constituencies to the Isle The 2018 Review of Wight. Neither of these constituencies is required to have an electorate that is within We have the task of periodically reviewing the requirements on electoral size set out the boundaries of all the Parliamentary in the rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Openness & Accountability Mailing List
    Openness & Accountability Mailing List AINA Amateur Rowing Association Anglers Conservation Association APCO Association of Waterway Cruising Clubs British Boating Federation British Canoe Union British Marine Federation Canal & Boat Builder’s Association CCPR Commercial Boat Operators Association Community Boats Association Country Landowners Association Cyclist’s Touring Club Historic Narrow Boat Owners Club Inland Waterways Association IWAAC Local Government Association NAHFAC National Association of Boat Owners National Community Boats Association National Federation of Anglers Parliamentary Waterways Group Rambler’s Association The Yacht Harbour Association Residential Boat Owner’s Association Royal Yachting Association Southern Canals Association Steam Boat Association Thames Boating Trades Association Thames Traditional Boat Society The Barge Association Upper Avon Navigation Trust Wooden Canal Boat Society ABSE AINA Amber Valley Borough Council Ash Tree Boat Club Ashby Canal Association Ashby Canal Trust Association of Canal Enterprises Aylesbury Canal Society 1 Aylesbury Vale District Council B&MK Trust Barnsley, Dearne & & Dover Canal Trust Barnet Borough Council Basingstoke Canal Authority Basingstoke Canal Authority Basingstoke Canal Authority Bassetlaw District Council Bath North East Somerset Council Bedford & Milton Keynes Waterway Trust Bedford Rivers Users Group Bedfordshire County Council Birmingham City Council Boat Museum Society Chair Bolton Metropolitan Council Borough of Milton Keynes Brent Council Bridge 19-40
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    031. Executive Summary Transport Department A Transport Vision and Strategy for Milton Keynes Local Transport Plan 3 - 2011 to 2031 Executive Summary www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/transport-strategy 1 of 12 | Milton Keynes Council | 2010 April 2011 A Transport Vision and Strategy for Milton Keynes. LTP3 - 2011 to 2031. Executive Summary This document has been prepared by Milton Keynes Council For further information please contact: Milton Keynes Council Transport Policy Civic Offices 1 Saxon Gate East Central Milton Keynes MK9 3EJ Tel: 01908 252510 Fax: 01908 254212 Email: [email protected] Web: www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/transport-strategy 2 of 12 | Milton Keynes Council | 2011 A Transport Vision and Strategy for Milton Keynes. LTP3 - 2011 to 2031. Executive Summary Contents INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 4 A TRANSPORT VISION FOR MILTON KEYNES ............................................................................ 5 MILTON KEYNES BOROUGH ......................................................................................................... 6 TRAVEL PATTERNS........................................................................................................................ 6 3 of 12 | Milton Keynes Council | 2011 A Transport Vision and Strategy for Milton Keynes. LTP3 - 2011 to 2031. Executive Summary Executive Summary Introduction Milton Keynes is an innovative, ‘can-do’ borough. Its unique layout and
    [Show full text]
  • Lamp Benefice Profile
    Deanery of Newport Benefice Profile THE LAMP GROUP St Leonard, Little Linford; All Saints, Emberton; St Mary, Haversham; St Peter, Tyringham with Filgrave Contents Foreword from the Archdeacon of Buckingham 03 Introduction 04 The Role 05 Person Specification 06 The Mission of our Churches 07 Group Information 10 Financial summary of our churches 12 The LAMP Group Churches 14 St Leonard, Little Linford 14 All Saints, Emberton 15 St Mary, Haversham 18 St Peter, Tyringham with Filgrave 20 The Rectory 23 The Deanery of Newport 24 The Diocese of Oxford 26 Appendix A 27 2 • The Lamp Group Benefice Profile Foreword from the Archdeacon of Buckingham The four churches of the LAMP Benefice are set in distinctively rural villages, and yet are close to the large and growing town of Milton Keynes and all the facilities it offers. The northern border of the benefice, at Emberton, also borders the thriving market town of Olney. This is a lovely place to live and an exciting place to minister. The vacancy offers many opportunities for developing the mission of these churches and the lay teams here are eager to reach out into their communities. This is an exciting time to be joining the Newport deanery too. With the ongoing expansion of Milton Keynes and the planned Oxford-Cambridge arc, and East-West rail, this part of the world will become even more of a hub than it already is. Because of the proposed reorganisation of the whole deanery, we seek to appoint an Interim Priest-in-Charge with the gifts and experience to prepare this benefice for its ministry and mission in the years to come.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE for DUTY PRIEST Benefice of Newport
    HOUSE FOR DUTY PRIEST Benefice of Newport Pagnell with Lathbury & Moulsoe The Big Thank You Service for Local Emergency Services 1 Contents 3 Introduction and Mission 4 Mission in our four churches 5 Strengths and Weaknesses 5 Ministry Team 6 Looking to the Future 7 Description of Role - outline Person specification - outline 8 Our Benefice 9 St Peter and St Paul’s St Luke’s 10 All Saints, Lathbury St Mary’s Moulsoe 11 Social Geography, Issues and Concerns, Worship, Occasional Offices 12 Finance, Church Life, Schools & Young People, Choir, Sunday Club 13 Events, Organisation 14 Housing 15 Deanery Information 17 Diocesan Information 18-24 Appendix 1 – Role Description 25-26 Appendix 2 – Person Specification 2 The Parish of Newport Pagnell is on a journey to becoming more open to mission and ministry within the community. We are seeking a House for Duty priest to join us on that journey and help us realise our vision. We are looking for a priest who is excited at bringing the Gospel to our Benefice in a way that nurtures all that is currently good but will bring new ideas to complement and extend our mission. We want a supporting and positive soul who is motivated by the love of Christ to do what they can to bring heaven to our piece of earth. We will do our best to support and encourage such a priest to reach their own full potential and look forward to growing together spiritually. The following information is an overview of who we are and where we are at presently but with the right House for Duty Priest in place, we shall have exciting times ahead! Mission The Parish of Newport Pagnell has been undergoing a process of change since 2008 from a traditionally minded church community to a church which is more open to mission and ministry within the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Strategy: Submission Version
    Core Strategy: Submission Version (4) Position Statement Milton Keynes Council Position Statement Land East of the M1 motorway i. The Secretary of State's Proposed Changes to the South East Plan (July 2008), include a recommendation in Policy MKAV1 (Housing Distribution by District 2006-2026) for "at least 5,600 dwellings by 2026 on suitable sites to the east of the M1 motorway" and that in order to bring about the step change in housing delivery, Core Strategy: Submission Version suitable sites in this location should be brought forward now. The Secretary of State recognises that further studies may be needed to test the ultimate scale of development suitable for this area after 2026 and to that end states that "The form of development east of the M1 motorway should not prejudice consideration of future development in the locality after 2026". ii. The reason given in the Proposed Changes for the introduction of the land to the east of the M1 is to help meet the Government's aims for a step change in housing provision. It also seems that the 5,600 homes proposed for this area are intended to compensate for the ‘lost’ homes proposed by the Panel for the Bedfordshire part of the South East Strategic Development Area (SDA). iii. Milton Keynes Council's response to the Proposed Changes consultation was agreed at Cabinet on 7 October 2008. In addition to approving the detailed comments on the Proposed Changes, Cabinet gave the go ahead to consideration of a legal challenge to the final version of the South East Plan should the allocation of land east of the M1 remain, subject to a report assessing the potential grounds for a challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Notice from Milton Keynes Council
    PUBLIC NOTICE THE COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF MILTON KEYNES (VARIOUS ROADS, REDWAYS, FOOTPATHS AND BRIDLEWAYS, MILTON KEYNES – THE 2021 MK MARATHON WEEKEND EVENT) (TEMPORARY CLOSURES AND RESTRICTIONS) ORDER 2021 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Council of the Borough of Milton Keynes intends to make an order under Sections 14(4) and 16A of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 for the purpose of facilitating the holding of a relevant events, namely the Milton Keynes Marathon and Half Marathon, the Rocket 5k, Fun Run and Turing 10k running events which is being promoted by Mr Andy Hully, Race Director, MK Marathon Weekend. It is anticipated that the following temporary closures will be in effect on Friday 25th, Saturday 26th and Sunday 27th June 2021. The effect of the proposed order will be as follows: - 1) The following lengths of road and redway will be closed between the hours of 18:00 and 21:30 on Friday 25th June 2021 to accommodate the Turing 10k running event: 18:00-21:00 Old Groveway its entire length 18:30-21:00 Marlborough Street (V8) between Simpson Roundabout and Mount Farm roundabout Newington Gate, Ashland at its junction with Marlborough Street (V8) Redway AS01 between Shelsley Avenue, Ashland and Saxon Street (V7) 2) The following lengths of road and redway will be closed between the hours of 05:00 and 17:00 on Saturday 26th June 2021 to accommodate the Rocket 5k, MK Half Marathon and Fun Run running events: 05:00-09:30 Avebury Boulevard, CMK (westbound carriageway only) between Bank Field roundabout and Secklow Gate 05:00-17:00
    [Show full text]
  • Land to the East of Newport Road and to the East and West of Cranfield Road, Woburn Sands, Buckinghamshire Mk17 8Uh Application Ref: 16/00672/Out
    Appendix B Woburn Sands Appeal Decision B001 B002 Timothy Waller Our ref: APP/Y0435/W/17/3169314 Waller Planning Ltd Suite A, 19-25 Salisbury Square Old Hatfield Hertfordshire AL9 5BT 25 June 2020 Dear Sir TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 78 APPEAL MADE BY WAVENDON PROPERTIES LTD LAND TO THE EAST OF NEWPORT ROAD AND TO THE EAST AND WEST OF CRANFIELD ROAD, WOBURN SANDS, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE MK17 8UH APPLICATION REF: 16/00672/OUT 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of Tom Gilbert-Wooldridge BA (Hons) MTP MRTPI IHBC, who held a public local inquiry from 14 - 23 January 2020 into your client’s appeal against the decision of Milton Keynes Council to refuse your client’s outline application, with all matters except the means of access reserved for subsequent approval, for residential development of up to 203 dwellings, a doctor’s surgery, open space and landscaping, together with pedestrian, cycle and vehicular access from Newport Road and Cranfield Road and supporting infrastructure, in accordance with application ref: 16/00672/OUT, dated 20 July 2016. 2. On 31 October 2017, this appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 79 of, and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to, the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 3. The Secretary of State initially issued his decision in respect of the above appeal in his letter dated 5 December 2018. That decision was challenged by way of an application to the High Court and was subsequently quashed by order of the Court dated 14 June 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • The Council of the Borough of Milton Keynes (The
    THE COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF MILTON KEYNES (THE COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF MILTON KEYNES (CALVERTON ROAD, STRATFORD ROAD, QUEEN ELEANOR STREET, WOLVERTON ROAD (PARTS), STONY STRATFORD, MILTON KEYNES) (40 MPH) ORDER 2008) VARIATION ORDER 2013 The Council of the Borough of Milton Keynes (“the Council”) in exercise of the powers of the said Council under Section 82(2), 83(2) and 84(1) and (2) and Part IV of Schedule 9 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 (“the Act of 1984”) and of all other enabling powers and after consultation with the chief officer of police in accordance with Part Ill of Schedule 9 hereby makes the following Order: PART I IMPLEMENTATION AND CITATION 1. This Order shall come into operation on 1 August 2012 and may be cited as “The Council of the Borough of Milton Keynes (The Council of the Borough of Milton Keynes (Calverton Road, Stratford Road, Queen Eleanor Street, Wolverton Road, (Parts), Stony Stratford, Milton Keynes) (40 MPH) Order 2008) Variation Order 2013”. 2. Any reference in this Order to any enactment shall be construed as a reference to that enactment as amended by any subsequent enactment. PART 2 VARIATIONS 3. The Council of the Borough of Milton Keynes (The Council of the Borough of Milton Keynes (Calverton Road, Stratford Road, Queen Eleanor Street, Wolverton Road, (Parts), Stony Stratford, Milton Keynes) (40 MPH) Order 2008 (“The Principal Order”) is varied as provided by the following provisions of this Order: 4. Item SL2 in Schedule 1 of the Principal Order is revoked and replaced with the following: QUEEN ELEANOR STREET, STONY STRATFORD SL3 From a point approximately 63 metres south-east of its junction with Wolverton Road and Stratford Road for a distance of approximately 1,251 metres in a north-westerly direction to its junction with London Road, Old Stratford.
    [Show full text]
  • 03/00866/Ful Comprehensive Development Comprising
    03/00866/FUL COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT COMPRISING DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS AND ERECTION OF (1) MULTI-PURPOSE SPORTS AND SPECTATOR EVENTS STADIUM/ARENA (INCLUDING COMMUNITY HUB AND CONFERENCE FACILITIES); (2) RETAIL SUPERCENTRE; (3) RETAIL NON-FOOD (DIY) STORE; (4) PETROL FILLING STATION; (5) MEDIA VILLAGE (B1 SPACE, HOTEL, HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTRE, AND RESTAURANTS); AND (6) TWO DRIVE THROUGH RESTAURANTS; TOGETHER WITH PARKING, PEDESTRIAN/CYCLE/MOTOR VEHICLE CIRCULATION, ROAD JUNCTIONS AND EXTENSIVE LANDSCAPING. FULL PERMISSION IS SOUGHT FOR ITEMS (1) TO (4) AND OUTLINE PERMISSION FOR ITEMS (5) AND (6). At: Land West of V7 Saxon Street (Denbigh North), Saxon Street, Bletchley, Milton Keynes For: Milton Keynes Stadium Consortium 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The application site is situated at Denbigh North. The site boundaries are formed by existing dual carriageway and distributor roads: A5(T) to the north, Grafton Street (V6)/Bletcham Way (H10) to the west and south, and Saxon Street (V7) to the east. 1.2 The site is approximately 29.5ha. The north western part is allocated in the adopted Local Plan for employment development, and currently lies undeveloped. The south eastern part is occupied by several large buildings in commercial leisure use (indoor go-karting, nightclub, children’s activity centre, etc). The rest is occupied by playing fields, with a single club house/pavilion and associated car parking. There is a single detached house (now vacant) close to the leisure buildings at the southern end of the site. The leisure buildings, the club house/pavilion and its car parking, and the house are accessed from Goslington, a minor road that links the V6 and V7.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Assessment September 2018
    Strategic Assessment September 2018 Page 1 Contents INTRODUCTION Page 3 Purpose Page 4 Methodology Page 4 PESTELO Page 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Page 12 GENERAL CONTEXT Page 16 Review of 2017 recommendations, Considerations and Information Gaps Page 18 EMERGING THEMES Page 21 Domestic Abuse Page 21 Anti-Social Behaviour Page 29 Street Drinking Page 37 Begging and Vagrancy Page 41 Hate Crime Page 45 Exploitation of Adults Page 50 Vulnerable Adult Risk Assessment Conference Page 50 Modern Day Slavery and Human Trafficking Page 51 Serious Sexual Offences Page 54 Exploitation of Young People Page 63 Child Sexual Exploitation & Missing Page 64 Preventing Radicalisation Page 66 Serious Youth Violence Page 67 County Lines Page 70 Cyber Crime Page 73 Knife Crime Page 76 Location Based Summary Page 81 COMMON THREADS Page 83 Drugs Misuse Page 83 Alcohol Misuse Page 85 Drug and Alcohol Health Needs Assessment Page 87 Mental Health Page 88 Re-Offending Page 91 Children and Young People Known to the Criminal Justice System Page 93 APPENDIX 1 – Summary of Recommendations Page 95 APPENDIX 2 – Glossary of Terms Page 97 APPENDIX 3 – Risk Assessment Matrix Page 99 Page 2 Introduction Bedford Borough Community Safety Partnership Bedford Borough Community Safety Partnership is a joint partnership between Bedford Borough Council, Bedfordshire Police, Bedfordshire Fire and Rescue Service, The National Probation Service, BeNCH Community Rehabilitation Company and Bedfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group who work together to tackle crime and anti-social behaviour that affect our communities. These agencies have a duty to come together and work with other groups, organisations and agencies to prevent crime and disorder.
    [Show full text]