“Putting the Magic Back Into Milton Keynes”
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bedfordshire and Its Boundaries with Buckinghamshire and Cambridge- Shire
CoPV ort No. 566 B evtew_oiJNpn-Metropol itan Counties COUNTY OF BEDFORDSHR AND ITS BOUNDARIES WITH : BUCKINGHAMSH R t AND CAMBRIDGESHIR LOCAL GOVERNlfEST BOUNDARY COMMISSION f'OIt ENGLAND REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell CBE PRICS FSVA Members Professor G E Cherry BA FRTPI PRICE Mr K F J Ennals CB Mr G R Prentice Mrs H R V Sarkany Mr B Scholes OBE THE RT HON NICHOLAS RIDLEY MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF NON METROPOLITAN COUNTIES THE COUNTY OF BEDFORDSHIRE AND ITS BOUNDARIES WITH BUCKINGHAMSHIRE AND CAMBRIDGE- SHIRE COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT AND PROPOSALS INTRODUCTION 1. On 26 July 1985 we wrote to Bedfordshire County Council announcing our intention to undertake a review of the County under section 48{1) of the Local Government Act 1972. Copies of the letter were sent to the principal local authorities, and parishes, in Bedfordshire and in the surrounding counties of Buckinghamshire, Cambridgeshire, Hertfordshire and Northamptonshire; to the National and County Associations of Local Councils; to the Members of Parliament with constituency interests and to the headquarters of the main political parties. In addition, copies were sent to those government departments, regional health authorities, water authorities, and electricity and gas boards which might have an interest, as well as to British Telecom, the English Tourist Board, the local government press and to local television and radio stations serving the area. 2. The County Councils were requested, in co-operation as necessary with the other local authorities, to assist us in publicising the start of the review by inserting a notice for two successive weeks in local newspapers so as to give a wide coverage in the areas concerned. -
02/00866/Min Waste Management Facility
02/00866/MIN WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY INCLUDING MATERIALS RECOVERY, COMPOSTING , BIOLOGICAL WASTE TREATMENT, ENERGY RECOVERY, CONTINUED LANDFILL AND ASSOCIATED CLAY EXTRACTION, ACCESS ROAD, VISITOR CENTRE, CAR PARKING, RAIL ACCESS, RAIL SIDINGS, RAIL RECEPTION AREA, RAIL CONTAINER LOADING AND UNLOADING PLANT AND RAIL CONTAINER STORAGE AREA AT Bletchley Landfill Site, Bletchley Road, Newton Longville FOR Shanks Waste Services Limited The Proposal Planning permission is being sought for an Integrated Waste Management Facility to be sited at Bletchley Landfill Site. The proposal includes facilities for materials recovery from waste, buildings for composting and other biological treatment, plant for the recovery of energy from residential waste through thermal treatment, a research and development complex, a visitor centre, continued landfill and associated day working, a new road access connecting to the Stoke Hammond bypass when constructed, offices and car parking, a new rail access and rail reception area comprising a rail spur from the Bletchley to Oxford line, rail sidings and an associated area for container loading, unloading and storage. The Application Site The application site extends to 155 hectares as the development site includes the existing landfill site. The final landform of the landfill site would be altered from that recently given planning permission to enable the proposed waste management facility to be sited at the lowered ground level within the former brick clay pit. The application site straddles the boundary of this authority and Buckinghamshire County Council. The parts of the application comprising the composting facility, the rail reception area and the southern part of the new access road would, therefore, fall to Buckinghamshire County Council to determine. -
Telford & Wrekin Council
TELFORD & WREKIN COUNCIL West Midlands Property Alliance Using assets for growth Introduction Background Telford and Wrekin is a unitary district with borough status in the West Midlands. The district was created in 1974 as The Wrekin, then a non-metropolitan district of Shropshire. In 1998 the district became a unitary authority and was renamed Telford and Wrekin. It remains part of the Shropshire ceremonial county and shares institutions such as the Fire and Rescue Service with the rest of Shropshire. The borough’s major settlement is Telford, a new town designated in the 1960s incorporating the existing towns of Dawley, Madeley, Oakengates and Wellington. Telford was a new town run by the Telford Development Corporation (TDC) from the 1960s to the changes in 1974. Telford is located in central England with excellent connectivity by road and rail to Birmingham, Manchester, London and other centres. This connectivity includes an international railfreight park serving businesses looking to move goods across the UK and to air and sea ports. The population of the borough is 173,000 set to rise to 200,000 by 2030. The town was designed to accommodate a population of 200,000 and so has the necessary space and infrastructure for a growth area. Telford is home to more than 5,000 companies of which 150 are international. It has a strong automotive and engineering base as well as a broad range of other companies. There is a ready workforce of 350,000 within a 30 minute drive of Telford. Situated just 12 miles from the new Jaguar Landrover plant at i54 Telford is well placed to capitalise on supply chain opportunities. -
Initial Proposals for New Parliamentary Constituency Boundaries in the South East Region Contents
Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the South East region Contents Summary 3 1 What is the Boundary Commission for England? 5 2 Background to the 2018 Review 7 3 Initial proposals for the South East region 11 Initial proposals for the Berkshire sub-region 12 Initial proposals for the Brighton and Hove, East Sussex, 13 Kent, and Medway sub-region Initial proposals for the West Sussex sub-region 16 Initial proposals for the Buckinghamshire 17 and Milton Keynes sub-region Initial proposals for the Hampshire, Portsmouth 18 and Southampton sub-region Initial proposals for the Isle of Wight sub-region 20 Initial proposals for the Oxfordshire sub-region 20 Initial proposals for the Surrey sub-region 21 4 How to have your say 23 Annex A: Initial proposals for constituencies, 27 including wards and electorates Glossary 53 Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the South East region 1 Summary Who we are and what we do Our proposals leave 15 of the 84 existing constituencies unchanged. We propose The Boundary Commission for England only minor changes to a further 47 is an independent and impartial constituencies, with two wards or fewer non -departmental public body which is altered from the existing constituencies. responsible for reviewing Parliamentary constituency boundaries in England. The rules that we work to state that we must allocate two constituencies to the Isle The 2018 Review of Wight. Neither of these constituencies is required to have an electorate that is within We have the task of periodically reviewing the requirements on electoral size set out the boundaries of all the Parliamentary in the rules. -
Wind up of Leeds and Bristol Urban Development Corporations
NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE REPORT BY THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL Wind Up of Leeds and Bristol Urban Development Corporations ORDERED BY THE HOUSE OF COMMONS TO BE PRINTED 24 FEBRUARY 1997 LONOON: The Stationery Office HC 292 Session 1996-97 Published 28 February 1997 f8.95 WND UP OF LEEDS AND BRISTOL URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONS This report has been prepared under Section 6 of the National Audit Act, 1983 for presentation to the House of Commons in accordance with Section 9 of the Act. John Bourn National Audit Office ComptroUer and Auditor General 10 February 1997 The ComptroUer and Auditor General is the head of the National Au&t Office employing some 750 staff. He, and the National Audit Office, are tota~y independent of Government. He certifies the accounts of aU Government departments and a wide range of other public sector boties; and he has statutory authority to report to ParEament on the economy, efficiency and effectiveness with which departments and other bodies have used their resources. WND UP OF LEEDS ~D BRISTOL URB~ DEVELOPMENT CORPOWTIONS Contents Page SmnmaV and recommendations 1 Achievement of windup objectives 1 The ac~evement of value for money 5 The proper conduct of pubhc business 6 Part 1: Background 9 Introduction 9 Wind Up 11 Cotittee of PnbHc Accounts 12 Scope and methodology 12 Part 2: Wtid up of Leeds Development Corporation 16 Background 16 Managing wind up 17 Disposal of assets and Eabtities 19 Transfer of functions 24 Tbe proper conduct of pub~c business 26 Laying a foundation for sustained regeneration -
The Last Utopia: Days of the New Town, Birchwood at 50
Fitzpatrick, Su (2018) The Last Utopia: Days of the New Town, Birchwood at 50. [Show/Exhibition] Downloaded from: http://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/4459/ Research at York St John (RaY) is an institutional repository. It supports the principles of open access by making the research outputs of the University available in digital form. Copyright of the items stored in RaY reside with the authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full text items free of charge, and may download a copy for private study or non-commercial research. For further reuse terms, see licence terms governing individual outputs. Institutional Repository Policy Statement RaY Research at the University of York St John For more information please contact RaY at [email protected] The Last Utopia Looking back at the New Town at Birchwood by Susan Fitzpatrick People’s Archive pic by Nigel Hartley, taken with his Pentax K1000 in Birchwood Science Park sometime toward the mid-1980s. I grew up in Birchwood between 1980 and 1997 and I eventually became a lecturer in Human Geography. In 2015, I found out there was an archive of the Warrington New Town Development Corporation (DC) held by the Local Archive in Chester. Spurred by nosiness and a bit of nostalgia, I spent the next summer looking through this archive. For days at a time I read through resident designation policies, landscape reports, plans for playgrounds (with a futuristic theme to be set in the bunkers of the old Ordnance Factory in what is now Birchwood Forest Park), plans for a new nature reserve, plans for how to encourage new residents to take ownership of the landscape of Birchwood with the help of a new Ranger Service, a leisure ‘high street’ containing a 1700 seater auditorium; bars; conference suites; a fitness club; a youth club; an advice centre.. -
Chapter 4 URBAN REGENERATION CITY of MANCHESTER
Chapter 4 URBAN REGENERATION CITY OF MANCHESTER Table of Contents 4.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 4 4.2 Brief History of Manchester: City Profile ........................................................ 4 4.2.1 Post-Industrial Shift ............................................................................................... 4 4.2.2 Greater Manchester Regional Structure................................................................. 5 4.2.3 Creating a Centre: Ongoing Management of Growth in the Manchester Core ..... 5 4.3 Castlefield ................................................................................................................. 7 4.3.1 Background............................................................................................................ 7 4.3.2 Decline of the 1950's and 1960's............................................................................ 8 4.3.3 Regeneration - Urban Heritage Park...................................................................... 8 4.3.4 Key Projects of the Regeneration Programme - Results........................................ 8 4.3.4.1 Redevelopment of the Middle Warehouse (Castle Quay) ......................................................... 8 4.3.4.2 Slate Wharf ................................................................................................................................9 4.3.4.3 Merchants' Warehouse............................................................................................................. -
Openness & Accountability Mailing List
Openness & Accountability Mailing List AINA Amateur Rowing Association Anglers Conservation Association APCO Association of Waterway Cruising Clubs British Boating Federation British Canoe Union British Marine Federation Canal & Boat Builder’s Association CCPR Commercial Boat Operators Association Community Boats Association Country Landowners Association Cyclist’s Touring Club Historic Narrow Boat Owners Club Inland Waterways Association IWAAC Local Government Association NAHFAC National Association of Boat Owners National Community Boats Association National Federation of Anglers Parliamentary Waterways Group Rambler’s Association The Yacht Harbour Association Residential Boat Owner’s Association Royal Yachting Association Southern Canals Association Steam Boat Association Thames Boating Trades Association Thames Traditional Boat Society The Barge Association Upper Avon Navigation Trust Wooden Canal Boat Society ABSE AINA Amber Valley Borough Council Ash Tree Boat Club Ashby Canal Association Ashby Canal Trust Association of Canal Enterprises Aylesbury Canal Society 1 Aylesbury Vale District Council B&MK Trust Barnsley, Dearne & & Dover Canal Trust Barnet Borough Council Basingstoke Canal Authority Basingstoke Canal Authority Basingstoke Canal Authority Bassetlaw District Council Bath North East Somerset Council Bedford & Milton Keynes Waterway Trust Bedford Rivers Users Group Bedfordshire County Council Birmingham City Council Boat Museum Society Chair Bolton Metropolitan Council Borough of Milton Keynes Brent Council Bridge 19-40 -
Executive Summary
031. Executive Summary Transport Department A Transport Vision and Strategy for Milton Keynes Local Transport Plan 3 - 2011 to 2031 Executive Summary www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/transport-strategy 1 of 12 | Milton Keynes Council | 2010 April 2011 A Transport Vision and Strategy for Milton Keynes. LTP3 - 2011 to 2031. Executive Summary This document has been prepared by Milton Keynes Council For further information please contact: Milton Keynes Council Transport Policy Civic Offices 1 Saxon Gate East Central Milton Keynes MK9 3EJ Tel: 01908 252510 Fax: 01908 254212 Email: [email protected] Web: www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/transport-strategy 2 of 12 | Milton Keynes Council | 2011 A Transport Vision and Strategy for Milton Keynes. LTP3 - 2011 to 2031. Executive Summary Contents INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 4 A TRANSPORT VISION FOR MILTON KEYNES ............................................................................ 5 MILTON KEYNES BOROUGH ......................................................................................................... 6 TRAVEL PATTERNS........................................................................................................................ 6 3 of 12 | Milton Keynes Council | 2011 A Transport Vision and Strategy for Milton Keynes. LTP3 - 2011 to 2031. Executive Summary Executive Summary Introduction Milton Keynes is an innovative, ‘can-do’ borough. Its unique layout and -
Lamp Benefice Profile
Deanery of Newport Benefice Profile THE LAMP GROUP St Leonard, Little Linford; All Saints, Emberton; St Mary, Haversham; St Peter, Tyringham with Filgrave Contents Foreword from the Archdeacon of Buckingham 03 Introduction 04 The Role 05 Person Specification 06 The Mission of our Churches 07 Group Information 10 Financial summary of our churches 12 The LAMP Group Churches 14 St Leonard, Little Linford 14 All Saints, Emberton 15 St Mary, Haversham 18 St Peter, Tyringham with Filgrave 20 The Rectory 23 The Deanery of Newport 24 The Diocese of Oxford 26 Appendix A 27 2 • The Lamp Group Benefice Profile Foreword from the Archdeacon of Buckingham The four churches of the LAMP Benefice are set in distinctively rural villages, and yet are close to the large and growing town of Milton Keynes and all the facilities it offers. The northern border of the benefice, at Emberton, also borders the thriving market town of Olney. This is a lovely place to live and an exciting place to minister. The vacancy offers many opportunities for developing the mission of these churches and the lay teams here are eager to reach out into their communities. This is an exciting time to be joining the Newport deanery too. With the ongoing expansion of Milton Keynes and the planned Oxford-Cambridge arc, and East-West rail, this part of the world will become even more of a hub than it already is. Because of the proposed reorganisation of the whole deanery, we seek to appoint an Interim Priest-in-Charge with the gifts and experience to prepare this benefice for its ministry and mission in the years to come. -
HOUSE for DUTY PRIEST Benefice of Newport
HOUSE FOR DUTY PRIEST Benefice of Newport Pagnell with Lathbury & Moulsoe The Big Thank You Service for Local Emergency Services 1 Contents 3 Introduction and Mission 4 Mission in our four churches 5 Strengths and Weaknesses 5 Ministry Team 6 Looking to the Future 7 Description of Role - outline Person specification - outline 8 Our Benefice 9 St Peter and St Paul’s St Luke’s 10 All Saints, Lathbury St Mary’s Moulsoe 11 Social Geography, Issues and Concerns, Worship, Occasional Offices 12 Finance, Church Life, Schools & Young People, Choir, Sunday Club 13 Events, Organisation 14 Housing 15 Deanery Information 17 Diocesan Information 18-24 Appendix 1 – Role Description 25-26 Appendix 2 – Person Specification 2 The Parish of Newport Pagnell is on a journey to becoming more open to mission and ministry within the community. We are seeking a House for Duty priest to join us on that journey and help us realise our vision. We are looking for a priest who is excited at bringing the Gospel to our Benefice in a way that nurtures all that is currently good but will bring new ideas to complement and extend our mission. We want a supporting and positive soul who is motivated by the love of Christ to do what they can to bring heaven to our piece of earth. We will do our best to support and encourage such a priest to reach their own full potential and look forward to growing together spiritually. The following information is an overview of who we are and where we are at presently but with the right House for Duty Priest in place, we shall have exciting times ahead! Mission The Parish of Newport Pagnell has been undergoing a process of change since 2008 from a traditionally minded church community to a church which is more open to mission and ministry within the community. -
Core Strategy: Submission Version
Core Strategy: Submission Version (4) Position Statement Milton Keynes Council Position Statement Land East of the M1 motorway i. The Secretary of State's Proposed Changes to the South East Plan (July 2008), include a recommendation in Policy MKAV1 (Housing Distribution by District 2006-2026) for "at least 5,600 dwellings by 2026 on suitable sites to the east of the M1 motorway" and that in order to bring about the step change in housing delivery, Core Strategy: Submission Version suitable sites in this location should be brought forward now. The Secretary of State recognises that further studies may be needed to test the ultimate scale of development suitable for this area after 2026 and to that end states that "The form of development east of the M1 motorway should not prejudice consideration of future development in the locality after 2026". ii. The reason given in the Proposed Changes for the introduction of the land to the east of the M1 is to help meet the Government's aims for a step change in housing provision. It also seems that the 5,600 homes proposed for this area are intended to compensate for the ‘lost’ homes proposed by the Panel for the Bedfordshire part of the South East Strategic Development Area (SDA). iii. Milton Keynes Council's response to the Proposed Changes consultation was agreed at Cabinet on 7 October 2008. In addition to approving the detailed comments on the Proposed Changes, Cabinet gave the go ahead to consideration of a legal challenge to the final version of the South East Plan should the allocation of land east of the M1 remain, subject to a report assessing the potential grounds for a challenge.