DOCSLIB.ORG

En En Amendments 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
En En Amendments 1 European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Foreign Affairs 2020/2081(INI) 2.9.2020 AMENDMENTS 1 - 388 Draft report Petras Auštrevičius (PE652.398v01-00) Proposal for a Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice- President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on relations with Belarus (2020/2081(INI)) AM\1212303EN.docx PE657.166v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegReport PE657.166v01-00 2/171 AM\1212303EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Viola Von Cramon-Taubadel on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group Motion for a resolution Citation 2 Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to the Council — having regard to the Council conclusions on Belarus of 15 February conclusions on Belarus of 15 February 2016, 2016 and the main outcomes of the video conference of Foreign Affairs Ministers of 14 August 2020, Or. en Amendment 2 Viola Von Cramon-Taubadel on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group Motion for a resolution Citation 2 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to the Conclusions by the President of the European Council following the video conference of the members of the European Council on 19 August 2020, Or. en Amendment 3 Attila Ara-Kovács Motion for a resolution Citation 4 Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to the Joint — having regard to the Joint Declarations of the Eastern Partnership Declarations of the Eastern Partnership Summits of 2009 in Prague, 2011 in Summits of 2009 in Prague, 2011 in Warsaw, 2013 in Vilnius, 2015 in Riga and Warsaw, 2013 in Vilnius, 2015 in Riga, 2017 in Brussels, 2017 in Brussels and Eastern Partnership leaders' video conference in 2020, AM\1212303EN.docx 3/171 PE657.166v01-00 EN Or. en Amendment 4 Petras Auštrevičius, Javier Nart, Nathalie Loiseau, Malik Azmani, Hilde Vautmans Motion for a resolution Citation 5 Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to the agreement — having regard to the agreement between the European Union and the between the European Union and the Republic of Belarus on the readmission of Republic of Belarus on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation, persons residing without authorisation, which will enter into force on 1 July 20201 which entered into force on 1 July 20201 , , __________________ __________________ 1 OJ L 182, 10.6.2020, p. 1. 1 OJ L 182, 10.6.2020, p. 1. Or. en Amendment 5 Urmas Paet Motion for a resolution Citation 6 Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to the agreement — having regard to the agreement between the European Union and the between the European Union and the Republic of Belarus on the facilitation of Republic of Belarus on the facilitation of the issuance of visas2 , which will enter the issuance of visas2 , which entered into into force on 1 July 2020, force on 1 July 2020, __________________ __________________ 2 OJ L 180, 9.6.2020, p. 3. 2 OJ L 180, 9.6.2020, p. 3. Or. en Amendment 6 Petras Auštrevičius, Javier Nart, Nathalie Loiseau, Malik Azmani, Hilde Vautmans Motion for a resolution Citation 6 PE657.166v01-00 4/171 AM\1212303EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to the agreement — having regard to the agreement between the European Union and the between the European Union and the Republic of Belarus on the facilitation of Republic of Belarus on the facilitation of the issuance of visas2 , which will enter the issuance of visas2 , which entered into into force on 1 July 2020, force on 1 July 2020, __________________ __________________ 2 OJ L 180, 9.6.2020, p. 3. 2 OJ L 180, 9.6.2020, p. 3. Or. en Amendment 7 Anna Fotyga, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, Elżbieta Kruk, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Mazurek, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Witold Jan Waszczykowski, Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Andżelika Anna Możdżanowska, Elżbieta Rafalska, Joanna Kopcińska, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Beata Szydło, Adam Bielan Motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to a joint statement on Belarus of EPP, S&D, Renew Europe, Greens/EFA and ECR groups in the European Parliament of 17 August 2020, Or. en Amendment 8 Viola Von Cramon-Taubadel on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to the 6th round of the bilateral Human Rights Dialogue between the EU and Belarus on 18 June 2019 in Brussels, Or. en AM\1212303EN.docx 5/171 PE657.166v01-00 EN Amendment 9 Viola Von Cramon-Taubadel on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group Motion for a resolution Citation 7 b (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to the Joint Statement by High Representative/Vice- President Josep Borrell and Neighbourhood and Enlargement Commissioner Olivér Várhelyi of 10 August 2020, as well as the Declaration by the High Representative on behalf of the European Union on the presidential elections in Belarus of 11 August 2020, Or. en Amendment 10 Viola Von Cramon-Taubadel on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group Motion for a resolution Citation 7 c (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to the Statement by the EEAS Spokesperson on recent developments in Belarus of 19 June 2020 and the statements by the High Representative/Vice-President Josep Borrell related to the elections in Belarus of 14 July 2020, 7 August 2020, and 17 August, Or. en Amendment 11 Viola Von Cramon-Taubadel on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group Motion for a resolution Citation 7 d (new) PE657.166v01-00 6/171 AM\1212303EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to statements by the EEAS Spokesperson on the application of the death penalty in Belarus, notably of 30 July 2019, 28 October 2019, 20 December 2019, 11 January 2020, and 7 March 2020, Or. en Amendment 12 Petras Auštrevičius, Javier Nart, Nathalie Loiseau, Malik Azmani, Hilde Vautmans Motion for a resolution Citation 8 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to its recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the Eastern Partnership, in the run-up to the June 2020 Summit, Or. en Amendment 13 Viola Von Cramon-Taubadel on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group Motion for a resolution Citation 8 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to the Report of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus of 10 July 2020, Or. en Amendment 14 Petras Auštrevičius, Javier Nart, Nathalie Loiseau, Malik Azmani, Hilde Vautmans AM\1212303EN.docx 7/171 PE657.166v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Citation 8 b (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to the statement of the President of the European Parliament calling to stop the violence in Belarus of 13 August 2020, Or. en Amendment 15 Petras Auštrevičius, Javier Nart, Nathalie Loiseau, Malik Azmani, Hilde Vautmans Motion for a resolution Citation 8 c (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to a common statement on Belarus of political leaders from EPP, S&D, Renew Europe, Greens/EFA and ECR groups in the European Parliament of 17 August 2020, Or. en Amendment 16 Petras Auštrevičius, Javier Nart, Nathalie Loiseau, Malik Azmani, Hilde Vautmans Motion for a resolution Citation 8 d (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to the declaration by the High Representative on behalf of the European Union on the presidential elections in Belarus of 11 August 2020, Or. en Amendment 17 Petras Auštrevičius, Javier Nart, Nathalie Loiseau, Malik Azmani, Hilde Vautmans PE657.166v01-00 8/171 AM\1212303EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Citation 8 e (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to the conclusions on Belarus of the European Council on 19 August 2020, Or. en Amendment 18 Petras Auštrevičius, Javier Nart, Nathalie Loiseau, Malik Azmani, Hilde Vautmans Motion for a resolution Citation 8 f (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to the UN Human Rights Council’s Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus of 10 July 2020, Or. en Amendment 19 Petras Auštrevičius, Javier Nart, Nathalie Loiseau, Malik Azmani, Hilde Vautmans Motion for a resolution Citation 8 g (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to the UN statements on situation in Belarus, in particular those of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights of 12 August 2020, the UN Special Rapporteurs on human rights of 13 August 2020, and the Spokesperson for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights of 21 August 2020, Or. en Amendment 20 Petras Auštrevičius, Javier Nart, Nathalie Loiseau, Malik Azmani, Hilde Vautmans AM\1212303EN.docx 9/171 PE657.166v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Citation 8 h (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to the open letter on Diplomatic Watch activities during Presidential Elections 2020 in Belarus, Minsk of 13 August 2020, Or. en Amendment 21 Sandra Kalniete, Michael Gahler, Željana Zovko, Andrius Kubilius, Andrzej Halicki, Miriam Lexmann, Paulo Rangel, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Vladimír Bilčík, Antonio López- Istúriz White, Radosław Sikorski, David McAllister, Tomasz Frankowski, Janina Ochojska Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to the statement of the President of the European Parliament of 13 August and the leaders of the five political groups of 17 August on the situation in Belarus following the presidential election of 9 August, Or. en Amendment 22 David Lega Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Or.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 12.5.2021 A9-0115/11 Amendment 11 Frances Fitzgerald, Maria Da Graça
    12.5.2021 A9-0115/11 Amendment 11 Frances Fitzgerald, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Deirdre Clune, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Hildegard Bentele, Vladimír Bilčík, Daniel Caspary, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Geoffroy Didier, Jarosław Duda, José Manuel Fernandes, Loucas Fourlas, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Esteban González Pons, Christophe Hansen, György Hölvényi, Brice Hortefeux, Danuta Maria Hübner, Rasa Juknevičienė, Sandra Kalniete, Seán Kelly, Arba Kokalari, Ewa Kopacz, Andrius Kubilius, Stelios Kympouropoulos, Leopoldo López Gil, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Aušra Maldeikienė, Lukas Mandl, Liudas Mažylis, David McAllister, Francisco José Millán Mon, Nadine Morano, Marlene Mortler, Janina Ochojska, Markus Pieper, Jessica Polfjärd, Christian Sagartz, Simone Schmiedtbauer, Christine Schneider, Ralf Seekatz, Sara Skyttedal, Tomas Tobé, Eugen Tomac, Sabine Verheyen, Maria Walsh, Jörgen Warborn, Angelika Winzig, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Javier Zarzalejos, Željana Zovko, Milan Zver, Gabriel Mato, Henna Virkkunen, Franc Bogovič, Andrzej Halicki, Michael Gahler, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Tom Berendsen, Peter Pollák, Siegfried Mureşan, Peter Liese, David Lega, Pernille Weiss, Tomasz Frankowski, Lena Düpont, Magdalena Adamowicz, Dennis Radtke, Tom Vandenkendelaere, Radosław Sikorski, Traian Băsescu, Stefan Berger, Michaela Šojdrová Report A9-0115/2021 Mónica Silvana González Impacts of climate change on vulnerable populations in developing countries (2020/2042(INI)) Motion for a resolution Paragraph 73 - introductory part Motion for a resolution Amendment
    [Show full text]
  • Z Instytucji Unii Europejskiej
    nr 15(21) • 29 sierpnia 2019 Przegląd wydarzeń w Unii Europejskiej i informacji o Unii Europejskiej e Ursula von der Leyen nową przewodniczącą Komisji Europejskiej e e Polscy posłowie w komisjach PE e e Uzasadniona opinia KE dotycząca nowego systemu środków dyscyplinarnych wobec polskich sędziów e e Pozycja Niemiec w Unii Europejskiej e Z INSTYTUCJI UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ PARLAMENT EUROPEJSKI lament zdecyduje w głosowaniu, czy poprze skład nowej Komisji, któ- 16 lipca e Parlament Europejski w tajnym głosowaniu (przy użyciu pa- ry ostatecznie musi zostać zatwierdzony większością kwalifikowaną pierowych kart do głosowania) wybrał na stanowisko przewodniczącej Ko- przez Radę Europejską. Ursula von der Leyen ma objąć urząd 1 listo- misji Europejskiej Ursulę von der Leyen. W głosowaniu oddano 733 głosy pada 2019 r. (kadencja obecnej Komisji trwa do 31 października). (w tym 1 nieważny) – 383 eurodeputowanych głosowało za, 327 przeciw, 10 lipca e Odbyły się posiedzenia inauguracyjne komisji i podkomisji a 22 wstrzymało się od głosu. Ursula von der Leyen jest pierwszą kobietą Parlamentu Europejskiego. W IX kadencji PE powołano 20 wyspecjalizo- wybraną na stanowisko przewodniczącej Komisji Europejskiej. wanych komisji stałych. W skład każdej z nich wchodzi od 25 do 73 człon- Podczas poprzedzającej głosowanie debaty parlamentarnej kan- ków. Komisje wybierają spośród swoich członków przewodniczącego dydatka wygłosiła oświadczenie, w którym przedstawiła swoją wizję oraz maksymalnie czterech wiceprzewodniczących, którzy razem tworzą i plan działania. Wśród
    [Show full text]
  • Analiza „Lokomotyw” – Wiek, Wykształcenie, Kadencje
    Table 1 Imię i nazwisko Region Lista Miejsce na liście Wiek Stanowiska w polityce <- Jeśli tak, to jak? Krajowe Unijne lub Stopień akademicki <- Jaki? Kadencje w Sejmie lub Kadencje w PE Związany z regionem (Z) zagranicznej lub unijne międzynarodowe Senacie czy „spadochroniarz” (S) (nie licząc funkcji europosła) Radosław Sikorski Kujawsko-Pomorskie KE 1 56 T Szef MSZ x N - 3 - Z Elżbieta Łukacijewska Podkarpackie KE 2 52 T Przewodniczącą Podkomisji x N - 3 2 Z stałej do spraw monitorowania pozyskiwania i wykorzystania środków z funduszy z Unii Europejskiej. Należała do zgromadzenia parlamentarnego polsko- ukraińskiego Andrzej Halicki Mazowsze KE 2 57 T W 2012–2015 był x N - 4 - S przedstawicielem parlamentu w Zgromadzeniu Parlamentarnym Rady Europy Leszek Miller Wielkopolska KE 2 72 T przewodniczący Komitetu x N - 5 - Z Integracji Europejskiej Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz Warszawa KE 1 68 T Szef MSZ, przewodniczący x T Doktor nauk prawnych 7 - Z Komitetu Integracji Europejskiej Janina Ochojska Dolnośląskie-Opole KE 1 63 T Założycielka Polskiej Akcji x N - - - S Humanitarnej Jerzy Buzek Śląsk KE 1 78 T Przewodniczący Parlamentu x T Profesor nauk technicznych 1 3 Z Europejskiego, Przewodniczący Komitetu Integracji Europejskiej Czesław Siekierski Podkarpackie KE 1 66 T przewodniczący Komisji x T Doktor nauk ekonomicznych 2 3 Z Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi PE Bogusław Liberadzki Zachodniopomorskie- KE 1 70 T Wiceprzewodniczący PE, x T Profesor nauk 2 4 Z Lubuskie Stały obserwator Polski w ekonomicznych PE Janusz Lewandowski Pomorze KE 1 67 T Komisarz UE ds. budżetu i x T Doktor nauk 3 3 Z programowania ekonomicznych, publicysta finansowego Róża Thun Małopolska-Świętokrzyskie KE 1 64 T dyrektor Przedstawicielstwa x N - - 2 Z Komisji Europejskiej w Polsce Marek Belka Łódź KE 1 67 T przewodniczący Komitetu x T profesor nauk - - Z Integracji Europejskiej, ekonomicznych dyrektor Departamentu Europejskiego Międzynarodowego Funduszu Walutowego, sekretarza wykonawczy Europejskiej Komisji Gospodarczej ONZ Henryka Bochniarz Podlaskie - Warmińsko- KE 1 71 T Była członkinią m.in.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Assets and Liabilities in Belarus
    RUSSIA’S ASSETS AND LIABILITIES IN BELARUS Mathieu Boulègue CEPA Report | Russia’s Assets and Liabilities in Belarus CONTENTS he current political upheaval in Belarus does not center on The politics of influence .............................. 2 Tgeopolitics, but whatever the The economic and energy sectors .............. 6 outcome of the protest movement, Russia’s security and military clout .......... 7 Moscow will have a say, and a stake, in the Conclusion ........................................................ 10 looming transition of power. The Kremlin’s negative drivers of influence are heavily undermining state cohesion and societal stability through a well-known set of tools.1 ABOUT THE AUTHOR This paper explores Russian influence Mathieu Boulègue is a research fellow at the through the prism of recent developments Russia and Eurasia Programme at Chatham in the aftermath of the August presidential House, the Royal Institute of International election in Belarus. It identifies and Affairs, in London. assesses the main levers of influence The author is grateful for research assistance in the political, societal, economic, and provided by Kyiv-based journalist Iryna security spheres in order to understand Solomko as well as to CEPA President and the Kremlin’s current assets and liabilities. CEO Alina Polyakova and CEPA Senior Fellow Together with relevant case studies and Edward Lucas for their comments and policy recommendations, it analyzes what suggestions. Moscow can — and cannot — hope to achieve, how, and with whom. ABOUT CEPA The politics of The Center for European Policy Analysis influence (CEPA) is a 501(c)(3), non-profit, non-partisan, public policy research institute. Our mission Russia and Belarus have grown politically is transatlantic: to promote an economically estranged.2 In Minsk, acts of defiance vibrant, strategically secure, and politically started following Russia’s invasion of free Europe with close and enduring ties to Georgia in 2008, when Belarus refused to the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Prosecution of Viktar Babaryka in the Republic of Belarus
    CRIMINAL PROSECUTION OF VIKTAR BABARYKA IN THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS Statement of Facts Personal Information Viktar Babaryka (born 1963, Minsk) is a Belarusian banker, philanthropist, and public figure. Widower, has a son Edward and daughter Mary. Mr. Babaryka has headed Belgazprombank JSC and managed it since 2000 until May 2020. During this time Belgazprombank had entered the top five of the largest banks of Belarus. In 2008, V. Babaryka established the Chance Foundation to help sick children. He financed the Belarusian Nobel laureate Svetlana Alexievich’s books publication. With the assistance of V. Babaryka, the original Bible of Francis Skorina was returned to Belarus, as well as paintings by famous artists from Belarus - Mark Chagall, Chaim Sutin, Leu Bakst. On May 12, 2020, Mr. Babaryka had publicly announced his presidential ambitions. Nowadays he is considered as the main competitor of President A. Lukashenko in the upcoming presidential elections on August 9, 2020. According to all polls conducted, the rating of V. Babaryka significantly exceeds the rating of President A. Lukashenko. On June 18, 2020 Viktar Babaryka was arrested by the Belarusian authorities and still remains in custody. и до настоящего времени находится под стражей. Arrest On June 18, 2020 Viktar Babaryka who is nominated as a candidate for President of the Republic of Belarus, together with his son Eduard Babaryka who is leading the campaign, were detained by the Department of Financial Investigations of the State Control Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The arrest was preceded by public statements by President A. Lukashenko regarding the allegedly unlawful activities of V.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Elections of May 2019
    The European Elections of May 2019 Electoral systems and outcomes STUDY EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Kai Friederike Oelbermann and Friedrich Pukelsheim PE 652.037 – July 2020 EN The European Elections of May 2019 Electoral systems and outcomes This EPRS study provides an overview of the electoral systems and outcomes in the May 2019 elections to the European Parliament. It analyses the procedural details of how parties and candidates register their participation, how votes are cast, how valid votes are converted into seats, and how seats are assigned to candidates. For each Member State the paper describes the ballot structure and vote pattern used, the apportionment of seats among the Member State’s domestic parties, and the assignment of the seats of a party to its candidates. It highlights aspects that are common to all Member States and captures peculiarities that are specific to some domestic provisions. EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service AUTHOR(S) This study has been written by Kai-Friederike Oelbermann (Anhalt University of Applied Sciences) and Friedrich Pukelsheim (University of Augsburg) at the request of the Members’ Research Service, within the Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services (EPRS) of the Secretariat of the European Parliament. The authors acknowledge the useful comments made by Wilhelm Lehmann (European Parliament/European University Institute) on drafts of this paper. PUBLISHER Members' Research Service, Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services (EPRS) To contact the publisher, please e-mail [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Manuscript finalised in June 2020. DISCLAIMER AND COPYRIGHT This document is prepared for, and addressed to, the Members and staff of the European Parliament as background material to assist them in their parliamentary work.
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels, 15 October 2020 Mr Josep Borrell Fontelles, High
    Brussels, 15 October 2020 Mr Josep Borrell Fontelles, High Representative Vice President of the European Commission Dear High Representative, The situation in Belarus remains very difficult. For three months now, the women and men of Belarus have been fighting for their fundamental rights - including their rights to freedom and democracy - whilst the regime responded with nothing but brutality and violence. The EU must continue to support the people of Belarus in all possible ways, including through financial means. Although we welcome measures undertaken so far – such as a decision to provide additional funds of EUR 53 million – much more needs to be done in this regard. In its Conclusions from 1 October 2020, the European Council called on the Commission to prepare a comprehensive plan of economic support for democratic Belarus, whilst this Parliament has recently urged the EU to organise a donors’ conference for a democratic Belarus. Such a conference would bring together international financial institutions, G-7 countries, EU Member States and institutions, as well as others willing to pledge a multi-billion Euro financial package. This would offer us a unique opportunity to support future reform towards democracy, the modernisation of the country’s economy and to assist the Belarusian society in these changes. Therefore, we would like to ask whether the EEAS has started developing a concept of the donors’ conference for Belarus, and whether you have any tentative timeline concerning this valuable initiative? It would be worth drawing on the EU’s experience in this field, including informal donors' coordination meetings on Belarus that was a platform set up in the context of the conference „Solidarity with Belarus” organised in Warsaw in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • — Special Report —
    FROM THE HISTORY OF THE BELARUSIAN REVOLUTION — SPECIAL REPORT — 11/19/2020 FROM THE HISTORY OF THE BELARUSIAN REVOLUTION Publisher: Warsaw Institute Wilcza St. 9 00-538 Warsaw, Poland +48 22 417 63 15 www.warsawinstitute.org [email protected] Authors: Grzegorz Kuczyński – Director of Eurasia Program, Warsaw Institute Jędrzej Duszyński – Executive Assistant, Warsaw Institute Editor: Maciej Śmigiel Translation and proofreading: Paweł Andrejczuk Typesetting and formatting: Dariusz Ligęza –L.STUDIO Front page photo: Pexels/Artem Podrez The opinions and positions presented in this publication reflect the views of the authors only. © Warsaw Institute 2020 2 Special Report www.warsawinstitute.org FROM THE HISTORY OF THE BELARUSIAN REVOLUTION TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 THE BELARUSIAN REVOLUTION: THE BEGINNING AND THE END (?) 5 ROUND TABLE ON BELARUS: REPORT ON THE DEBATE 13 #BelarusAlert REVOLUTION DAY BY DAY 16 AUTHORS 59 www.warsawinstitute.org Special Report 3 FROM THE HISTORY OF THE BELARUSIAN REVOLUTION INTRODUCTION On August 9, 2020, Belarus held a fraudulent presidential election, which was officially won by Alexander Lukashenko, who has been ruling the country since 1994. Even taking into account the whole spectrum of anti-democratic actions characterizing the regime in Minsk, it could be said that it was a kind of a break- through moment, after which the Belarusian society has said “enough.” This was additionally influenced by the economic situation of the country and disappoint- ment with the actions of the authorities against the coronavirus pandemic. The Belarusian people decided to express their dissatisfaction by protesting on a scale which was unprecedented in the history of this country, at the same time attracting the attention of the whole world.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Crackdown on Human Rights Ahead of Presidential Election
    www.amnesty.org AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC STATEMENT 29 June 2020 EUR 49/2620/2020 BELARUS: GROWING CRACKDOWN ON HUMAN RIGHTS AHEAD OF PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION The Belarusian authorities have once again flagrantly disregarded the country’s human rights obligations in a growing clampdown on human rights, including the rights to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association in the context of electoral campaigning initiatives across different sectors of society in the run-up to the presidential election, scheduled for 9 August 2020. Opposition candidates and their supporters are targeted, harassed and intimidated. The authorities must end politically motivated prosecutions, intimidation, harassment and reprisals against Alyaksandr Lukashenka’s opponents and their supporters, civil society activists and independent media. All those arbitrarily detained under criminal or administrative proceedings solely for peacefully exercising their human rights must be immediately and unconditionally released. All those suspected of being responsible for human rights violations and abuses must be identified and brought to justice. BACKGROUND The current human rights situation in Belarus is deteriorating. For years, political life in the country appeared dormant. The status quo—the political preeminence of Alyaksandr Lukashenka and his five extended and uninterrupted terms as the president—was seldom challenged, and only by those few who were prepared to, and often did, risk their freedom if not their lives. This year, the prospect of an election in which the incumbent may face a real challenge from a mix of what many people consider to be credible contenders appears to have stirred genuine public interest in politics. The background to this is a growing perception by many that support for Alyaksandr Lukashenka has fallen considerably.
    [Show full text]
  • Letters to Political Prisoners in Belarus
    Brno 15 November 2020 Letters to Political Prisoners in Belarus On the occasion of 17 November, the Centre for Experimental Theatre in Brno, in cooperation with the Embassy of Independent Belarusian Culture in the Czech Republic, will launch an extraordinary project in which important personalities of Czech cultural and public life write personal letters to Belarusian political prisoners. Centre for Experimental Theatre (CED) and the Embassy of Independent Belarusian Culture in the Czech Republic decided to honour this year‘s anniversary of the Velvet Revolution and November 17 with a direct connection to current events in the world and contemporary issues. The result of these reflections is the instigation of personal letters to Belarusian political prison- ers. CED thus wants to build on the legacy of Vaclav Havel, who has always strived to uphold fundamental human rights and freedoms, whether they have been violated in our country or elsewhere in the world. The ethos of 17 November seems to the initiators to be a good date to launch this extraordinary project. The citizens of Belarus have been fighting for fair elections and freedom for many months. „We find it right and extremely important to loudly warn the Czech and world public that Belarus and Lukashenko‘s authoritarian regime are acting unfairly and that they are suppressing basic human rights. In Belarus, people are arrested, imprisoned, beaten, intimidated and otherwise fought for peaceful and non-violent expression of their views. This is inadmissible and we fun- damentally oppose such actions, „explains Miroslav Oscatka, Director of CED. The Ambassador of Independent Belarusian Culture in the Czech Republic, Sjarhej Smatry- chenka, adds: „Of the thousands of people detained in Belarus or imprisoned, especially in connection with protests against the irregular presidential election in 2020, we have selected twelve personalities to encourage and send a message to them that we think of them and that we are not indifferent to their efforts and destiny.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 4 May 2021
    United Nations A/HRC/47/49 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 May 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty-seventh session 21 June–9 July 2021 Agenda item 4 Human rights situations that require the Council’s attention Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus, Anaïs Marin Summary In the present report, the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus describes the situation of civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights in 2020 and early 21 in Belarus. The mandate holder documents the ongoing wave of repression in the country with evidence of massive violations unprecedented in scope and gravity. In focusing on the right to education, she also highlights systemic problems in access to quality education, tutoring in the Belarusian language, education in correctional facilities, compulsory enrolment in students’ unions, the limitation of teachers’ rights, and academic freedoms. The Special Rapporteur concludes that the Government should address long- standing issues by introducing concrete, durable changes. On the basis of the human rights concerns identified, she makes recommendations for concretely improving the situation of human rights of all in Belarus. GE.21-05897(E) A/HRC/47/49 I. Introduction A. Summary 1. The Human Rights Council established the mandate of Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus in 2012 by its resolution 20/13. The Council has since renewed the mandate eight times, each time for one year, in its resolutions 23/15, 26/25, 29/17, 32/26, 35/27, 38/14, 41/22 and 44/19.
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus 2020 Human Rights Report
    BELARUS 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Belarus is an authoritarian state. The constitution provides for a directly elected president who is head of state and a bicameral parliament, the National Assembly. A prime minister appointed by the president is the nominal head of government, but power is concentrated in the presidency, both in fact and in law. Citizens were unable to choose their government through free and fair elections. Since 1994 Alyaksandr Lukashenka has consolidated his rule over all institutions and undermined the rule of law through authoritarian means, including manipulated elections and arbitrary decrees. All elections subsequent to 1994, including the August 9 presidential election, have fallen well short of international standards. The 2019 National Assembly elections also failed to meet international standards. The Ministry of Internal Affairs exercises authority over police, but other bodies outside of its control, for example, the Committee for State Security, the Financial Investigations Department of the State Control Committee, the Investigation Committee, and presidential security services, also exercise police functions. The president has the authority to subordinate all security bodies to the president’s personal command. Lukashenka maintained effective control over security forces. Members of the security forces committed numerous abuses. The country experienced massive civil unrest following the August 9 presidential election as demonstrators protested widespread vote rigging by Lukashenka as well as the government’s widespread use of brute force against and detentions of peaceful protesters. Weekly protests drawing at their peak up to hundreds of thousands of protesters began election night and continued through the end of the year.
    [Show full text]