Tree Fruit Culture and Cultivars in North Dakota
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
APPLE (Fruit Varieties)
E TG/14/9 ORIGINAL: English DATE: 2005-04-06 INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW VARIETIES OF PLANTS GENEVA * APPLE (Fruit Varieties) UPOV Code: MALUS_DOM (Malus domestica Borkh.) GUIDELINES FOR THE CONDUCT OF TESTS FOR DISTINCTNESS, UNIFORMITY AND STABILITY Alternative Names:* Botanical name English French German Spanish Malus domestica Apple Pommier Apfel Manzano Borkh. The purpose of these guidelines (“Test Guidelines”) is to elaborate the principles contained in the General Introduction (document TG/1/3), and its associated TGP documents, into detailed practical guidance for the harmonized examination of distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) and, in particular, to identify appropriate characteristics for the examination of DUS and production of harmonized variety descriptions. ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS These Test Guidelines should be read in conjunction with the General Introduction and its associated TGP documents. Other associated UPOV documents: TG/163/3 Apple Rootstocks TG/192/1 Ornamental Apple * These names were correct at the time of the introduction of these Test Guidelines but may be revised or updated. [Readers are advised to consult the UPOV Code, which can be found on the UPOV Website (www.upov.int), for the latest information.] i:\orgupov\shared\tg\applefru\tg 14 9 e.doc TG/14/9 Apple, 2005-04-06 - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. SUBJECT OF THESE TEST GUIDELINES..................................................................................................3 2. MATERIAL REQUIRED ...............................................................................................................................3 -
Planting and Aftercare of New Trees
Where to start? • Fruit plants that fit into to small spaces Producing Fruit for the Home – Apple … on dwarfing rootstocks • Most traditional and local garden centers do not identify specific rootstock ….”Dwarf”, “Semi Dwarf” Ron Perry • Eventual tree size within Dwarf and Semi Dwarf is large Professor Tree Spacing Nursery ID Hort. Department Rootstocks Eventual Height Between Trees Between Rows MSU M.27 or P.22 Dwarf 6 5 10 M.9 Dwarf 8 8 12 M.26 Dwarf 16 10 16 M.7 Semi Dwarf 18 14 22 MM.106 or 111 Semi Dwarf 20 16 22 Where to start? Where to start? • Fruit plants that fit into to small spaces – Cherry - Sour • Select desired fruit which will grow in your area. Tree Spacing Rootstocks • Determine how much space you have available. Varieties Eventual Height Between Trees Between Rows Northstar Mahaleb 10 8 12 • Select varieties which are easiest to grow. Montmorency Gi.5 or 6 12 10 12 Montmorency Mahaleb 12 10 14 – Disease or insect resistant varieties to reduce pest Montmorency Mazzard 14 12 16 pressures. Balaton Mahaleb 14 12 16 – Cherry - Sweet – Assess soil / site conditions Tree Spacing • Full sun VS shade or partial Nursery ID • Soil internal drainage Rootstocks Eventual Height Between Trees Between Rows • Weed competition (lawns are too competitive) Gi.5 Dwarf 12 12 16 Gi.6 Dwarf 14 14 16 Mahaleb Semi Dwarf 20 14 16 Mazzard Semi Dwarf 24 16 20 Average Annual Minimum Temperatures Where to start? (USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map) Most MI fruit sites Zone 5 (-20oF to -10oF) to 6 (-10oF to 0oF) • Fruit plants that fit into to small spaces – Peach, Nectarine, Apricot and Plums – Can generally plant at a spacing of 10 ft X 15 ft* • * If trained to open center or vase shape • Closer spacing, needs to be trained in Chistmas Tree form (Vertical Axe). -
Popular Kheti Volume -2, Issue-2 (April-June), 2014 Available Online at © 2014 Popularkheti.Info ISSN: 2321-0001
Popular Article Popular Kheti Volume -2, Issue-2 (April-June), 2014 Available online at www.popularkheti.info © 2014 popularkheti.info ISSN: 2321-0001 Growing Fruits in Home Garden K. Usha*, B. Singh and Lal Chand Division of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, IARI, New Delhi *Email of corresponding author: [email protected] Even if you have limited space, you can still enjoy growing fresh fruits in your garden by growing fruit plants in containers. You can grow any fruit tree in a container for a few years and then transplant it. You can also choose a dwarf variety, which is well suited to living in a container. If you carefully choose the kind and varieties of a fruit before you plant, you can harvest dessert-quality fruit from early summer through the fall . Many fruit plants are aesthetically pleasing and are good for “edible landscaping.” Some fruits, such as apple, citrus, blueberries and figs, make outstanding ornamental plants. Some people find a natural setting with plants placed throughout the landscape most aesthetically pleasing. But this makes maintenance more challenging. Introduction Growing fruits at home can be fun, delightful experience and a challenging hobby. There are several good reasons to grow fruit yourself. Fruits add beautiful colour and variety to your garden. Large amounts of fruit can be grown in a relatively small area. Store-bought fruits are often picked, shipped, and sold before they are fully ripened and generally stock selections that look prettiest but are not necessarily the best tasting. In addition, fresh garden fruits are a good source of vitamins; minerals, carbohydrates, fibre (Table 1) and will provide your family with flavourful, delicious and nutritious food. -
Apple Peel As Affected by Rootstock, Harvest Maturity, and Storage Method
HORTSCIENCE 51(4):349–355. 2016. factors, rootstock controls tree size (Webster, 2001), regulates mineral uptake and leaf mineral composition (Fallahi et al., 2001), Ursolic and Oleanolic Acid in ‘Aroma’ and affects hydraulic resistance, water use of scion, and fruit quality (Cohen and Naor, Apple Peel as Affected by Rootstock, 2002; Cohen et al., 2007; Fallahi et al., 2002). Furthermore, they may have resistance to Harvest Maturity, and Storage Method soil-transmitted diseases (Modgil et al., 2012) and fire blight (Kaja et al., 2015). Yanrong Lv1, Ibrahim I. Tahir, and Marie E. Olsson Many suggestions have been made to explain Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, the separate features in the rootstocks that P.O. Box 101, SE-23053, Alnarp, Sweden exert these differences such as the character- istics of the bark, production and movement Additional index words. triterpene, controlled atmospheric storage, semi-dwarfing ‘MM.106’, of different plant hormones, and top-root dwarfing ‘M.9’ relationships (Ferree and Warrington, 2003; Rom and Carlson, 1987). Dwarfing root- Abstract . Apples contain substances with health-promoting properties, among them, stock ‘M.9’ and semi-dwarfing rootstock triterpenes, including oleanolic acid (OA) and ursolic acid (UA), which are thought to ‘MM.106’ are commonly used in apple or- have anti-inflammatory activity as well as inhibiting initiation, promotion, and metas- chards in many countries. ‘M.9’ rootstock tasis of cancer. This study evaluated effects of harvest time, rootstock, and storage was introduced as one of the Malling apple method on two major triterpenes in apple peel, to enhance the understanding of the rootstock series, a result of a successful trial relative importance of cultivation and environmental factors influencing triterpene in England, which evaluated rootstocks of concentration. -
Apples: Organic Production Guide
A project of the National Center for Appropriate Technology 1-800-346-9140 • www.attra.ncat.org Apples: Organic Production Guide By Tammy Hinman This publication provides information on organic apple production from recent research and producer and Guy Ames, NCAT experience. Many aspects of apple production are the same whether the grower uses low-spray, organic, Agriculture Specialists or conventional management. Accordingly, this publication focuses on the aspects that differ from Published nonorganic practices—primarily pest and disease control, marketing, and economics. (Information on March 2011 organic weed control and fertility management in orchards is presented in a separate ATTRA publica- © NCAT tion, Tree Fruits: Organic Production Overview.) This publication introduces the major apple insect pests IP020 and diseases and the most effective organic management methods. It also includes farmer profiles of working orchards and a section dealing with economic and marketing considerations. There is an exten- sive list of resources for information and supplies and an appendix on disease-resistant apple varieties. Contents Introduction ......................1 Geographical Factors Affecting Disease and Pest Management ...........3 Insect and Mite Pests .....3 Insect IPM in Apples - Kaolin Clay ........6 Diseases ........................... 14 Mammal and Bird Pests .........................20 Thinning ..........................20 Weed and Orchard Floor Management ......20 Economics and Marketing ........................22 Conclusion -
OMRI Disease Management
Organic Tools for Apple Diseases Srdjan G. Acimovic 5 March 2021 Outline 1. Apple Scab 2. Fire Blight 3. Cedar Apple Rust 4. Marssonina Blotch – Diplocarpon coronariae 5. Summer Diseases Hudson Valley Research Laboratory Apple Scab (Venturia inaequalis) Marssonina Leaf & Fruit Blotch Cycle - Diplocarpon coronariae fungus - Rain and Wind Source:www.arbofux.de Rain and Wind Source: 2013 EPPO Adapted from: Back & Jung 2014, Journal of Medical Mycology 42(3):183-190 Orchard Sanitation – My Approach Fire Blight, Apple Scab, MLFB • Prune out fire blight cankers and strikes • Nectria blight and canker • Remove fruit mummies • Reduction of overwintering inoculum in leaf litter • Fall, spring, spring & fall • Before leaf drop – Fall • Orchard floor - late Winter, before budbreak • Turn air deflectors downward, turn top nozzles off • 40 lb urea / A / 100 gals (rinse equipment) • Flail mow, dolomitic lime Organic: no urea • Flail mowing - no snow & no mud • Dolomitic lime, powder - lime spreader • After the leaf drop – Fall, early in Winter, late winter (no snow) • 2.5 tons / A Year Differ – Weather Conditions Differ - RIMpro apple scab model 2018 - GT HIG T P BL PF FC 14 7 24 C K 9 25 Apr Apr May May May Hudson Valley Research Laboratory Year Differ – Use Prediction Models - RIMpro 2017 - H G P B P F F T T K L F C G C Hudson Valley Research Laboratory Primary Scab Season End & Cover Sprays - Continue Two Weeks of Sprays - • Coverage • Last-minute infections • Less than 5% of the season’s spores RIMpro BV, Netherlands Scab Control in Organic Apples - Recommendations - Choices: • Scab-resistant cv-s: Vf gene: Williams’ Pride, Jonafree, Liberty, Enterprise, Prima, Pristine, GoldRush • First 4-5 years grow trees using conventional pesticides first (!) • Orchard isolated from woodlots, hedgerows, meadows – source of rust, SBFS, bitter rot • Sites with excellent air drainage so leaves dry quickly, planting design • Sulfur, liquid lime sulfur (LLS), potassium bicarbonate (PB), copper on susceptible cultivars • Spray before rain i.e. -
INF03 Reduce Lists of Apple Varieites
ECE/TRADE/C/WP.7/GE.1/2009/INF.3 Specialized Section on Standardization of Fresh Fruit and Vegetables Fifty-fifth session Geneva, 4 - 8 May 2009 Items 4(a) of the provisional agenda REVISION OF UNECE STANDARDS Proposals on the list of apple varieties This note has been put together by the secretariat following the decision taken by the Specialized Section at its fifty-fourth session to collect information from countries on varieties that are important in international trade. Replies have been received from the following countries: Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Slovakia, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland and the USA. This note also includes the documents compiled for the same purpose and submitted to the fifty-second session of the Specialized Section. I. Documents submitted to the 52nd session of the Specialized Section A. UNECE Standard for Apples – List of Varieties At the last meeting the 51 st session of the Specialized Section GE.1 the delegation of the United Kingdom offered to coordinate efforts to simplify the list of apple varieties. The aim was to see what the result would be if we only include the most important varieties that are produced and traded. The list is designed to help distinguish apple varieties by colour groups, size and russeting it is not exhaustive, non-listed varieties can still be marketed. The idea should not be to list every variety grown in every country. The UK asked for views on what were considered to be the most important top thirty varieties. Eight countries sent their views, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, USA, Slovakia, Germany Finland and the Czech Republic. -
Two Quantitative Trait Loci, Dw1 and Dw2, Are Primarily Responsible for Rootstock-Induced Dwarfing in Apple
OPEN Citation: Horticulture Research (2015) 2, 15001; doi:10.1038/hortres.2015.1 ß 2015 Nanjing Agricultural University All rights reserved 2052-7276/15 www.nature.com/hortres ARTICLE Two quantitative trait loci, Dw1 and Dw2, are primarily responsible for rootstock-induced dwarfing in apple Toshi M Foster1,*, Jean-Marc Celton2,*, David Chagne´ 1, D Stuart Tustin3 and Susan E Gardiner1 The apple dwarfing rootstock ‘Malling9’ (‘M9’) has been used worldwide both to reduce scion vigour and as a genetic source for breeding new rootstocks. Progeny of ‘M9’ segregate for rootstock-induced dwarfing of the scion, indicating that this trait is controlled by one or more genetic factors. A quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis of a rootstock population derived from the cross between ‘M9’ 3 ‘Robusta5’ (non-dwarfing) and grafted with ‘Braeburn’ scions identified a major QTL (Dw1) on linkage group (LG) 5, which exhibits a significant influence on dwarfing of the scion. A smaller-effect QTL affecting dwarfing (Dw2) was identified on LG11, and four minor-effect QTLs were found on LG6, LG9, LG10 and LG12. Phenotypic analysis indicates that the combination of Dw1 and Dw2 has the strongest influence on rootstock-induced dwarfing, and that Dw1 has a stronger effect than Dw2. Genetic markers linked to Dw1 and Dw2 were screened over 41 rootstock accessions that confer a range of effects on scion growth. The majority of the dwarfing and semi-dwarfing rootstock accessions screened carried marker alleles linked to Dw1 and Dw2. This suggests that most apple dwarfing rootstocks have been derived from the same genetic source. -
Grafting Fruit Trees
Grafting Fruit Trees By Glossary of Grafting Terms Scion Rootstock • Grafting-the process of inserting a part of one plant into or on another in a way that they will unite and continue growth as a single unit. What the Scion Brings to the Union • Scion—A piece of last year's growth with two or three buds (genetic matilterial for vegetative—asexual propagation); the part inserted on the understock or what we will call rootstock. Under stock (rootstock) 1 Why is it necessary to vegetatively propagate most tree fruit and nut cultivars by grafting (or budding)? ● Vegetative (Asexual) propagation maintains the genetic identity of the offspring Scion: A detached shoot or twig containing buds from a woody plant, used in grafting. Alternate definition: A descendant; an heir; as, a scion of a royal stock. ● Trees are grafted (or budded) because they are often difficult to root or ● they benefit from characteristics of the rootstock variety. Sexual propagation…(its all in the genes) Cultivar “A” Cultivar “B” .. allows for genetic mixing and recombination that requires a number of steps for diploid parents. ..They must first form haploid gametocytes, and that means their diploid chromosomes must partition themselves into two sets. ..This partitioning can be called genetic segregation. Only a few are selected Dog Either or It takes a tremendous amount of time, effort, and screening process to determine whether Winner one of out of thousands or more resultant prodigies is discarded (a dog) or of commercial value (a winner). 2 Honeycrisp Dog or winner • Honeycrisp (Malus domestica 'Honeycrisp') is an apple cultivar developed at the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station's Horticultural Research Center. -
Open Michaelbasedowthesis.Pdf
The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Agricultural Sciences A COMPARISON OF ANATOMICAL TRAITS RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF BRITTLE BUD UNIONS IN APPLE A Thesis in Horticulture by Michael R. Basedow Copyright 2015 Michael R. Basedow Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science May 2015 The thesis of Michael R. Basedow was reviewed and approved* by the following: Robert M. Crassweller Professor of Horticulture Thesis Advisor Richard P. Marini Professor of Horticulture Head of the Department of Plant Science Kathleen M. Brown Professor of Plant Stress Biology Nicole R. Brown Associate Professor of Wood Chemistry *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. ii ABSTRACT Anatomical and histological traits related to the development of mechanically weak unions were evaluated between relatively weak (‘Honeycrisp’/‘M.26 EMLA’, ‘Cripps Pink’ cv.Maslin/‘Geneva® 41’, ‘Scilate’ (Envy™)/‘Geneva® 41’) and strong (‘Honeycrisp’/‘M.7 EMLA’, ‘Zestar!’/‘M.26 EMLA’, ‘Zestar!’/‘M.7 EMLA’, ‘Cripps Pink’ cv.Maslin/‘M.9 NAKB T337’, ‘Scilate’ (Envy™)/‘M.9 NIC29’) scion/rootstock combinations of apple. The objectives of these studies were to identify differences between these groups to determine the cause of the weak unions, and to determine if these methods would allow for the rapid screening of future potentially weak scion/rootstock combinations. Discolored sapwood was observed in the rootstock tissues of all of the combinations, and was investigated because of its association with wood decay. Trees were cut longitudinally and the discolored wood was photographed and quantified as a percentage of the total wood area using ImageJ image analysis software. -
Effects of Sunburn Treatments on Honeycrisp in the Hudson Valley In
Effects of Sunburn Treatments on Honeycrisp in the Hudson Valley in 2015 Gemma Reig1, Peter Jentsch2, David Rosenberger3 1Horticulture Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Hudson Valley Research Laboratory, Cornell University, Highland, NY 2Department of Entomology, Hudson Valley Research Laboratory, Cornell University, Highland, NY 3Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Hudson Valley Research Laboratory, Cornell University, Highland, NY This research was partially supported by the New York Apple Research and Development Program ppearance is a major factor in determining apple market- competition for assimilates, row orientation in the orchard, and ability. Anything that adversely affects fruit appearance, sudden exposure of fruit from a low-light environment to high ir- including sunburn (apple fruit discoloration caused radiance and low humidity can also contribute to its development A by heat-related (Racksó and Schrader 2012). stress), reduces Three types of sunburn in apples have been identified and Over the past five years, sunburn has “ economic viability characterized (Racskó and Schrader 2012): sunburn necrosis (Fig- been an issue in the production of of the crop (Felice- ure 1), sunburn browning (Figure 2) and photooxidative sunburn Honeycrisp high-density orchards in tti and Schrader (Figure 3). Sunburn necrosis occurs when the apple fruit surface New York, particularly in the Hudson 2009). Sunburned temperature (FST) approaches 126°F for approximately 10 min- Valley. Considering that the climate areas cause fruit utes. A dark brown or black necrotic spot appears on the exposed is warming and that high-density to be either culled surface within 1–4 days after exposure to such temperatures and or downgraded on cells in the necrotic spot often collapse (Racskó and Schrader 2012). -
Rootstocks for Kentucky Fruit Trees Dwight E
University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Food and Environment HO-82 Cooperative Extension Service Rootstocks for Kentucky Fruit Trees Dwight E. Wolfe, John Strang, Daniel Becker, and Shawn Wright, Horticulture ost fruit trees that can be grown in Figure 1. Comparative dwarfing by rootstocks for apples Kentucky do not come true from 100 seed.M For example, a tree grown from a 90 Golden Delicious apple seed will produce 80 an apple tree, but the fruit will have dif- 70 ferent characteristics than Golden Deli- 60 50 cious in color, taste, and shape. This is 40 why fruit trees are reproduced by asexual 30 propagation, such as budding and graft- 20 ing. The desired cultivar, Golden Deli- 10 cious in the example above, is budded or 0 G.65 Bud.9 G.41 G.202 Malling 7 MM.111 Standard grafted onto a rootstock, a close genetic P.22 Bud.9 Malling 9 Ottawa 3 Malling 7 MM. 111 Standard relative suitable for the graft. Rootstocks are selected to impart special traits—in- from the Budagovsky breeding program not always symptomatic of trees planted cluding dwarfing, disease resistance, and in Russia; “G” is used for rootstocks re- on sites where an old orchard has been insect resistance. leased and “CG” for rootstocks not yet removed to make way for a new one. This publication describes available released from Geneva-Cornell breeding Usually, the nursery grows the root- and some newer rootstocks that may program in New York; “O” is used for stock for one year before grafting or have limited nursery distribution for rootstocks developed at the Ottawa Re- budding the scion to the rootstock.