DOCSLIB.ORG

Sustainable Valueco2 Creation by Pulp & Paper Companies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sustainable Valueco2 Creation by Pulp & Paper Companies Sustainable ValueCO2 Creation by Pulp & Paper Companies www.SustainableValue.com Authors Ralf Barkemeyer, Frank Figge, Tobias Hahn, Andrea Liesen and Frank Müller This present survey was funded by the Swedish MISTRA foundation under the umbrella of the research projeĐƚ ͞^ƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďůĞ /ŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚ ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚ WůĂƚĨŽƌŵ͟ ;^/ZWͿ͕ ƐƵďƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ͞sĂůƵĞ-based ĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďŝůŝƚLJĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐŽĨEŽƌĚŝĐĐŽŵƉĂŶŝĞƐ͟. The study was authored by resear- chers of the following institutions: University of Leeds Euromed Management IZT ʹ Institute for Futures Marseille Studies and Technology Sustainability Research Assessment Institute, School of Earth & Domaine de Luminy - Environment BP 921 Schopenhauerstr. 26 13 288 Marseille cedex 9 14129 Berlin Leeds, LS2 9JT France Germany United Kingdom Contact: [email protected] We suggest to cite this report as follows: Barkemeyer, R.; Figge, F.; Hahn, T.; Liesen, A.; & Müller, F. (2011). Sustainable ValueCO2 Creation by Pulp & Paper Companies. Sustainable Value Research: Leeds, Marseille and Berlin. © Leeds, Marseille and Berlin 2011. All rights reserved. Dissemination of this document is free as long as full reference to the authors is made. Title art work: aboutpixel.de / Lesestoff © Rainer Sturm Sustainable ValueCO2 Creation by Pulp & Paper Companies Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Contents.............................................................................................................. 1 List of Figures and Tables .................................................................................................. 3 Foreword .......................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 6 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 9 2 Method for Calculating Sustainable Value................................................................ 10 2.1 The Sustainable Value Approach in Brief ................................................................. 10 2.2 The Valuation Logic of Sustainable ValueCO2 ............................................................ 11 2.3 Calculating Sustainable ValueCO2 ............................................................................. 12 2.4 Making Allowances for Company Size...................................................................... 15 2.5 Explanatory Power of Sustainable ValueCO2 ............................................................. 16 3 Scope of the Study................................................................................................... 17 3.1 Companies Studied ................................................................................................... 17 3.2 Indicators Assessed .................................................................................................. 19 3.3 Review Period ........................................................................................................... 21 3.4 CO2-Data Sources and Data Collection ..................................................................... 21 3.5 Data Coverage, Treatment of Missing Data and Data Problems ............................. 21 3.5.1 Data Coverage .................................................................................................. 22 3.5.2 Calculating and Estimating Performance Data ................................................ 23 3.5.3 Data Quality ...................................................................................................... 25 3.6 Emissions from Biofuels and Electricity Generation ................................................. 27 3.6.1 Biogenic Carbon Dioxide .................................................................................. 27 3.6.2 Indirect CO2 emissions or electricity usage ...................................................... 28 4 Results: Overview .................................................................................................... 31 4.1 EBIT-based assessment results ................................................................................. 31 1 Sustainable ValueCO2 Creation by Pulp & Paper Companies Table of Contents 4.1.1 Absolute Sustainable ValueCO2 (EBIT scenario) ................................................ 31 4.1.2 Sustainable ValueCO2 Margin (EBIT scenario) ................................................... 34 4.2 NVA-based assessment results ................................................................................. 36 4.2.1 Absolute Sustainable ValueCO2 (NVA scenario) ................................................ 37 4.2.2 Sustainable ValueCO2 Margin (NVA scenario) ................................................... 39 5 Discussion ............................................................................................................... 42 5.1 Benchmark development .......................................................................................... 42 5.2 Development of selected companies ........................................................................ 44 5.3 Conversion factors and biogenic emissions .............................................................. 47 6 Conclusions and Outlook ......................................................................................... 50 References ...................................................................................................................... 54 2 Sustainable Value Creation by Pulp & Paper Companies List of Figures and Tables List of Figures and Tables Figure 1: Value-oriented analysis of resource use ................................................................... 10 Figure 2: Value-oriented analysis of resource use ʹ CO2 case ................................................. 12 Figure 3: Calculation of the Sustainable ValueCO2 of SCA in 2009 ............................................ 15 Figure 4: Biogenic emissions as multiples of total scope 1&2 emissions in 2008 (various companies) ....................................................................................................................... 28 Figure 5: Hypothetical CO2 Performance of Holmen in 2009 in the four Nordic Countries .... 30 Figure 6: Absolute Sustainable ValueCO2 of pulp & paper companies in the EBIT-based assessment ....................................................................................................................... 33 Figure 7: Absolute Sustainable ValueCO2 of selected pulp & paper companies in the EBIT- based assessment............................................................................................................. 34 Figure 8: Sustainable ValueCO2 Margin of pulp & paper companies in the EBIT-based assessment ....................................................................................................................... 36 Figure 9: Absolute Sustainable ValueCO2 of pulp & paper companies in the NVA-based assessment ....................................................................................................................... 38 Figure 10: Sustainable ValueCO2 Margin of pulp & paper companies in the NVA-based assessment ....................................................................................................................... 41 Figure 11: Benchmark CO2 efficiency, accumulated return and accumulated CO2 emissions 2005 - 2009 (EBIT scenario) .............................................................................................. 42 Figure 12: Benchmark CO2 efficiency, accumulated return and accumulated CO2 emissions 2005 - 2009 (NVA scenario).............................................................................................. 43 Figure 13: Comparison of energy-efficiency and CO2-efficiency (NVA scenario; selected companies in the year 2008) ............................................................................................ 48 Table 1: Benchmark efficiencies 2005 - 2009 .......................................................................... 14 Table 2: Overview of companies .............................................................................................. 18 Table 3: Overview of countries of origin .................................................................................. 19 Table 4: Overview of industry affiliation .................................................................................. 19 Table 5: Data coverage ʹ EBIT based analysis .......................................................................... 22 Table 6: Data coverage ʹ NVA based analysis .......................................................................... 23 Table 7: Electricity-derived CO2-Emission Factors for Nordic Countries ................................ 29 3 Sustainable Value Creation by Pulp & Paper Companies List of Figures and Tables Table 8: Absolute Sustainable ValueCO2 and ranking of pulp & paper companies in the EBIT- ďĂƐĞĚĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ;ŝŶΦϭ͕ϬϬϬͿ ......................................................................................... 31 Table 9: Sustainable ValueCO2 Margin of pulp & paper companies in the EBIT-based assessment ....................................................................................................................... 35 Table 10: Absolute Sustainable ValueCO2 and ranking of pulp & paper companies in the NVA- ďĂƐĞĚĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ;ŝŶΦϭ͕ϬϬϬͿ
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proposed Members to the Board of Directors 130.83 KB
    Nominated current members of the Board of Directors Håkan Buskhe Member of Stora Enso’s Board of Directors since June 2020. Independent of the company but not of its significant shareholders due to his position as CEO of FAM AB. Håkan Buskhe, M.Sc. Eng., Licentiate of Engineering, born 1963, Swedish citizen. Chair of the Board of Directors of IPCO AB. Member of the Board of AB SKF, Munters Group and Kopparfors Skogar. CEO of FAM AB. CEO and President of SAAB AB (2010–2019) and E.ON Nordic (2008– 2010). Previous working experience further includes executive positions in E.ON Sweden (2006– 2008), acting as CEO of the logistics company Schenker North (2001–2006) as well as several positions in Storel AB (1998–2001), Carlsberg A/S (1994–1998) and Scansped AB (1988–1994). Buskhe has further held positions as Board member in several venture capital companies. Owns 2 781 R shares in Stora Enso. Elisabeth Fleuriot Member of Stora Enso’s Board of Directors since April 2013. Independent of the company and the significant shareholders. Born 1956. M.Sc. (Econ.). Board member and Chair of CSR Committee at G4S. Chair of the Board of Ynsect and Foundation Caritas. President and CEO of Thai Union Europe Africa 2013–2017. Senior Vice President, Emerging Markets and Regional Vice President, France, Benelux, Russia and Turkey, in Kellogg Company 2001–2013. General Manager, Europe, in Yoplait, Sodiaal Group 1998–2001. Several management positions in Danone Group 1979–1997. Owns 26 512 R shares in Stora Enso. Hock Goh Member of Stora Enso’s Board of Directors since April 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Times Are Good for KONE, Neste Oil and Wärtsilä
    Nov 01, 2013 10:39 UTC Times Are Good for KONE, Neste Oil and Wärtsilä M-Index, M-Brain’s quarterly look into the media coverage of 15 large Finnish stock-listed companies revealed that in July-September, KONE, Neste Oil and Wärtsilä were the companies most often at the receiving end of positive publicity. Nokia reached a larger audience than the combined audience of all the other companies surveyed. Positive media coverage – three companies stand out Slightly more than half of KONE’s publicity in the surveyed web publications of Helsingin Sanomat, Kauppalehti and Taloussanomat was positive by tone, an excellent result and a further improvement to the company’s early-year performance. Examples of favourable coverage included positive profit warning and improved stock exchange performance that followed, Forbes placing KONE as an even more innovative company than Google, and reports of large orders that the company won in China. For Neste Oil, almost four tenths of publicity was positive. The company continued its good performance, improving from the last quarter’s one fourth share of positive attention. Most of the favourable coverage was connected with financials. Media reported of Neste Oil’s profit warning and the role of renewables in the improved Q2 result. Wärtsilä was the third company to stand out in terms of the share of favourable publicity. Comparisons to earlier M-Index analyses show that the company has considerably improved its performance in the surveyed media, compared to the last year. More than a third of Wärtsilä’s publicity in Q3 was positive by tone.
    [Show full text]
  • Stora Enso Annual Report 2000 [email protected] Stora Enso International Office 9, South Street • London W1K 2XA • U.K
    “Stora Enso is the customers’ first choice” ANNUAL REPORT 2000 Contents Year 2000 in brief ............................................................1 Report on operations .....................................................47 Company presentation ....................................................2 Consolidated income statements ...................................51 Mission, vision and values................................................4 Consolidated balance sheets..........................................52 Strategy...........................................................................5 Equity reconciliation ......................................................53 Letter to shareholders ......................................................6 Consolidated cash flow statements ................................54 Shares and shareholders ..................................................8 Notes to the consolidated financial statements ..............56 Financial review .............................................................14 Parent company income statements ..............................89 Magazine paper.............................................................26 Parent company cash flow statements ...........................90 Newsprint......................................................................28 Parent company balance sheets.....................................91 Fine paper .....................................................................30 Parent company notes...................................................92
    [Show full text]
  • Financing of Stora Enso
    The financing of Stora Enso A research paper prepared for Friends of the Earth Europe and Friends of the Earth International The financing of Stora Enso A research paper prepared for Friends of the Earth Europe and Friends of the Earth International Final Draft: 6 May 2010 Jan Willem van Gelder Anna van Ojik Profundo Radarweg 60 1043 NT Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel: +31-20-820 83 20 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.profundo.nl Contents Summary ....................................................................................................................... i Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 1 The financing of Stora Enso ..................................................................... 2 1.1 Short company profile .................................................................................... 2 1.2 Financial structure .......................................................................................... 2 1.3 Shareholders ................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Bondholders .................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Bank loans ....................................................................................................... 4 1.6 Investment banking services ......................................................................... 5 1.7 Other forms of financing ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stora Enso 2013
    Financial Report Stora Enso 2013 Stora Enso in Brief Contents Stora Enso is the global rethinker of the paper, biomaterials, wood products and packaging industry. We always rethink the Stora Enso in Capital Markets 2 old and expand to the new to offer our customers innovative Debt Investors 9 solutions based on renewable materials. Corporate Governance in Stora Enso 10 Board of Directors 18 The Group has some 28 000 employees in more than 35 Group Leadership Team 20 countries worldwide, and is a publicly traded company listed Report of the Board of Directors 22 in Helsinki and Stockholm. Our customers include publishers, Consolidated Financial Statements 38 printing houses and paper merchants, as well as the packaging, Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 44 joinery and construction industries. Note 1 Accounting Principles 44 Note 2 Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgements 53 Our annual production capacity is 5.4 million tonnes of Note 3 Segment Information 55 chemical pulp, 11.7 million tonnes of paper and board, 1.3 Note 4 Acquisitions and Disposals 61 billion square metres of corrugated packaging and 5.6 million Note 5 Other Operating Income and Expense 62 cubic metres of sawn wood products, including 2.9 million Note 6 Staff Costs 63 cubic metres of value-added products. Our sales in 2013 were Note 7 Board and Executive Remuneration 64 EUR 10.5 billion, with an operational EBIT of EUR 578 million. Note 8 Net Financial Items 68 Note 9 Income Taxes 70 Stora Enso uses and develops its expertise in renewable Note 10 Valuation Allowances 72 materials to meet the needs of its customers and many of Note 11 Depreciation and Intangible Assets and Property, today’s global raw material challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Governance Statement
    KESKO ANNUAL REPORT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT Introduction 3 Other information to be provided in the CG statement 18 CORPORATE Descriptions concerning Corporate Governance 4 Internal audit 18 GOVERNANCE Kesko Group’s corporate governance system 4 Related party transactions 18 Board of Directors 5 Main procedures relating to insider administration 19 STATEMENT Managing Director (President and CEO) and his duties 12 Auditing 19 Group Management Board 12 Descriptions of internal control procedures and the main features of risk management systems 13 The Group’s financial reporting 13 Internal control 15 Risk management 16 KESKO'S YEAR 2019 2 Introduction This Corporate Governance Statement has been CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CODES KESKO COMPLIES WITH AND DEPARTURES FROM THEM reviewed at the meeting of the Audit Committee of Kesko Corporate Governance Code The Corporate Governance Code effective as of 1 January 2020 Corporation’s Board of Directors on 3 February 2020. the Company complies with (“Corporate Governance Code”) This is the Corporate Governance Statement in accordance Website where the Corporate cgfinland.fi/en/corporate-governance-code/ Governance Code is publicly available with the Finnish Corporate Governance Code issued by the Securities Market Association and effective as of 1 January Corporate Governance Code Recommendation 6 (Term of Office of the Board of Directors) 2020. Kesko Corporation issues the statement separately recommendations from which the Recommendation 10 (Independence of Directors) company departs from the Report by the Board of Directors. This statement and the other information to be disclosed in accordance Explanation of and grounds for The term of office of Kesko's Board of Directors departs from the one-year term pursuant to with the Corporate Governance Code, and the Company’s the departure Recommendation 6 (Term of Office of the Board of Directors) of the Corporate Governance • grounds for the departure Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2001 Information for Shareholders
    Annual Report 2001 Information for Shareholders ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING Letters authorizing a proxy to exer- INTERIM REPORTS 2002 The Annual General Meeting of cise a shareholder’s voting right at Wärtsilä Corporation will publish Wärtsilä Corporation will take place the AGM should be sent to the Interim Reports on its financial in the Congress Wing of the Helsinki Company before the notification performance during 2002 as follows: Fair Centre on Tuesday 12 March period expires. 2002, beginning at 4 p.m. January-March: 3 May 2002 Shareholders who have registered PAYMENT OF DIVIDEND January-June: 1 August 2002 themselves no later than 1 March The Board of Directors will propose January-September: 30 October 2002 in the Company’s shareholder to the Annual General Meeting that 2002. register maintained by the Finnish a normal dividend of EUR 0.50 and Central Securities Depository Ltd an extra dividend of EUR 3.50 or These Interim Reports are published may attend the AGM. altogether EUR 4.00 per share to be in English, Finnish and Swedish Shareholders whose shares have paid on the 2001 financial period. on Wärtsilä’s Internet site. Interim not been transferred to the book- The record date for dividend Reports will be sent by post on entry securities system may also payment is 15 March 2002, and the request. Interim Report orders: attend the AGM on condition that dividend payment date is 22 March tel. +358 10 709 0000 or such shareholders were registered in 2002, should the Board’s proposal be Internet: www.wartsila.com the Company’s shareholder register approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance Governance Covers Part of Stora Enso’S Annual Report 2018 Stora Enso’S Governance Policy, Practices, and Actions As Well As Our Remuneration Statement
    Strategy Annual Report 2018 Governance Governance covers Part of Stora Enso’s Annual Report 2018 Stora Enso’s governance policy, practices, and actions as well as our remuneration statement. Sustainability Financials Governance Strategy Annual Report 2018 Contents Corporate Governance in Stora Enso 2018 ......................................2 Shareholders’ meetings .........................................................................2 Board of Directors (Board) .....................................................................3 Sustainability Board committees ..................................................................................7 Management of the Company ...............................................................8 Internal control and risk management related to financial reporting ................................................................10 Remuneration Statement ................................................................. 11 Decision-making procedure ................................................................ 11 Main principles of remuneration .......................................................... 11 Remuneration Report 2018 ..................................................................13 Members of the Board of Directors .................................................15 Members of the Group Leadership Team ....................................... 17 Appendix 1 ...........................................................................................20 Financials Governance 2 Stora Enso
    [Show full text]
  • UPM the Biofore Company
    UPM The Biofore Company Investor Presentation December 2018 Competitive businesses with strong market positions UPM UPM UPM UPM UPM UPM BIOCHEMICALS BIOREFINING ENERGY RAFLATAC SPECIALTY COMMUNICA- PLYWOOD BIOCOMPOSITES PAPERS TION PAPERS Pulp Electricity Label Label papers, Magazine Plywood WOOD SOURCING Biofuels generation materials for release liners, papers, and veneer AND FORESTRY Timber and trading product and office papers newsprint and products information and flexible fine papers labelling packaging 2 | © UPM – The Biofore Company Global businesses – local presence UPM’s sales by market 2017 EUR 10,010 million 12,000 customers in 120 countries 54 62% production plants 13% Europe 20% in 12 countries 90,000 North America Asia shareholders in 35 countries 19,100 25,000 employees b-to-b suppliers 5% in 46 countries in 75 countries Rest of the world 3 | © UPM – The Biofore Company Operating on healthily growing markets UPM PLYWOOD Comparable EBIT by Plywood, veneer ~3% business area 2017 EUR 1,292m UPM COMMUNICATION PAPERS Graphic papers ~ –4% UPM BIOREFINING Pulp ~3% Biofuels strong UPM SPECIALTY PAPERS Timber ~2% Label papers ~4% High-end office papers ~4% UPM RAFLATAC Self-adhesive labels ~4% UPM ENERGY Demand trend growth, % pa 4 | © UPM – The Biofore Company Electricity ~1% Sustainable and safe products ELECTRICITY for everyday use everywhere PULP-BASED MATERIALS for packaging, transport, LABEL MATERIALS storage and hygiene products for food packaging, drinks bottles and for communicating PUBLICATION information PAPERS for reading
    [Show full text]
  • Stora Enso Half Year Financial Report January–June 2021 Q2 Results Summary
    Stora Enso Half year financial report January–June 2021 Q2 Results summary Strong performance and solid growth continue Q2/2021 (compared with Q2/2020) Strategy implementation update • Sales increased by 22.6% to EUR 2 592 (2 114) • The ramp-up of kraftliner production line at Oulu is million, due to higher deliveries and prices. Sales proceeding ahead of schedule. excluding Paper increased by 28.4%. • Stora Enso and Tetra Pak partner to provide circular • Operational EBIT increased to EUR 364 (178) million, solutions to the market to significantly improve due to higher prices and volumes, especially in recycling of beverage cartons in Central and Eastern Biomaterials, Wood Products, and Packaging Europe. Materials. Operational EBIT excluding Paper • The feasibility study regarding a possible expansion of increased to EUR 413 (216) million. the pulp and board production at Skoghall is expected • Operational EBIT margin increased to 14.0% (8.4%). to be finalised by the end of 2021. Excluding Paper, the operational EBIT margin was • Dispersion barrier coating started at the Forshaga site, 19.1% (12.9%). and commercial customer qualifications are ongoing. • Items affecting comparability (IAC) amounted to EUR • The pilot plant for carbon for energy storage at Sunila -171 (-7) million, mainly related to restructuring costs started up during the quarter as planned, and in the Paper division. production of Lignode® by Stora Enso is ramping up. • Operating profit (IFRS) decreased to EUR 182 (226) • The co-determination negotiations concerning closing million. down the pulp and paper production at the Veitsiluoto • EPS was EUR 0.26 (0.19) and EPS excl.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Markets Day 2014
    UPM PAPER ENA DRIVING FOR CASH Executive Vice President Bernd Eikens UPM Paper ENA UPM Paper Europe and North America Paper products for magazine and newspaper publishers, advertising end uses as well as home and office Large low-cost asset base and global sales network UPM Paper ENA 2013 (EURm) Sales 5,560 EBITDA 232 EBITDA, % 4% ROCE, % 0% Cash flow/CE 5% 2 | © UPM UPM Paper ENA Large low-cost operating platform Mills SC centers Augsburg North America Europe Personnel 11,000 Capacity 10Mt 18 mills / 37 PMs Location: Augsburg, Germany 3 | © UPM UPM Paper ENA The way forward • Customer segment based structure • Leaner organization and fast decisions • Operational focus, flexibility in operations • Variable and fixed cost savings continue • Limited investments • Capacity restructuring 850,000 tonnes • Fixed cost savings EUR 100m • Variable cost savings • Integration of Myllykoski realized annual cost synergies of EUR 200m • Capacity restructuring of 1,020,000 tonnes • Divestment of packaging paper operations 4 | © UPM UPM Paper ENA Customer segment based structure with differentiated strategies Common initiatives • Variable and fixed cost saving programs • New business developments Magazine Publishing & Newspaper Merchants, Advertising Publishing Home & Office • UPM capacity share in • UPM capacity share in • UPM capacity share in Europe: 25 – 45% Europe: ~20% Europe: ~10% • Assume industry • Grow in targeted • Customer/market leadership segments optimization to be • Differentiated go-to- continued market strategy within • Reduce value
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Commission for Europe
    1 ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Timber Committee October 2020 FINLAND MARKET STATEMENT 1 GENERAL ECONOMIC TRENDS In 2019, the Finnish economy grew by 1.1 percent year-over-year. At the end of the year, however, Finland's economic growth turned negative. In the first quarter of this year, the economy contracted further by 1.9 percent and in the second quarter by 4.5 percent from previous quarters. Compared to quarters a year ago, the corresponding percentages were -1.3 and -6.4, respectively. Technically, this means that Finland has been in recession throughout the first half of 2020. The corona-related restrictions on assembly and movement imposed in the spring affected particularly the service and transport sectors in Finland. Although the rapid rise in unemployment could be avoided through part-time work, lay-offs and other arrangements, the general increase in uncertainty and restrictive measures quickly dampened private consumption. The first wave of the pandemic in Finland was curbed fairly quickly, and the lifting of restrictions at the beginning of June quickly revived consumption and economic activity. However, significant growth in private consumption will be limited by rising unemployment towards the end of this year. In Finland, construction contracted even before corona, but the pandemic even had a stimulating effect on housing renovation, as the renovation of detached houses and summer cottages increased during the spring and summer due to remote work and mobility restrictions. Investments in machinery and equipment, on the other hand, will shrink this year as a result of uncertainty and weakening new orders. With the stimulus packages, public consumption will increase.
    [Show full text]