DOCSLIB.ORG

International Yearbook for Hermeneutics 17 · 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
International Yearbook for Hermeneutics 17 · 2018 International Yearbook for Hermeneutics 17 · 2018 International Yearbook for Hermeneutics Internationales Jahrbuch für Hermeneutik edited by Günter Figal and Bernhard Zimmermann in cooperation with Damir Barbaric´, Gottfried Boehm, Luca Crescenzi, Ingolf Dalferth, Nicholas Davey, Maurizio Ferraris, Jean Grondin, Pavel Kouba, Irmgard Männlein-Robert, Hideki Mine, Hans Ruin, John Sallis, Dennis Schmidt, Dirk Westerkamp 17 · 2018 Focus: Logos Schwerpunkt: Logos Mohr Siebeck Editorial directors / Redaktionsleitung: Dr. Tobias Keiling, PhD Dr. Anna Novokhatko Editorial team / Redaktion: Jon Burmeister Benjamin Harter Jerome Veith The Yearbook calls for contributions in English or German on topics in Philosophical Hermeneutics and bordering disciplines. Please send manuscripts to yearbook-he r m e n e u t i c s @altphil.uni-freiburg.de. All articles, except when invited, are subject to a double blind review. We assume that manuscripts are unpublished and have not been submitted for publi- cation elsewhere. Citations are to be made according to the style in the present volume. Detailed information on formatting manuscripts can be downloaded from: http://www.alt p h i l .uni-freiburg.de/IYH. Das Jahrbuch bittet um Zusendungen auf Deutsch oder Englisch zu Themen der Phil- osophischen Hermeneutik und angrenzender Disziplinen. Bitte senden Sie Manuskripte an: [email protected]. Alle Artikel, die nicht auf Einladung der Herausgeber verfasst worden sind, werden in einem double blind review-Verfahren begutachtet. Es wird davon ausgegangen, dass es sich bei eingereichten Manuskripten um un- veröffentlichte Originalbeiträge handelt, die nicht an anderer Stelle zur Veröffentlichung vorgelegt worden sind. Literaturhinweise bitte wie im vorliegenden Band. Ausführliche Hinweise für Manuskripte können unter http://www.altphil.uni-freiburg.de/IYH herun- tergeladen werden. ISBN 978-3-16-156244-0 / eISBN 978-3-16-156245-7 DOI 10.1628/978-3-16-156245-7 ISSN 2196-534X / eISSN 2568-8391 The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliogra- phie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2018 Mohr Siebeck Tübingen. www.mohrsiebeck.com This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permit- ted by copyright law) without the publisher’s written permission. This applies particularly to reproductions, translations and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was typeset by Martin Fischer in Tübingen using Bembo Antiqua and OdysseaU, printed by Laupp & Göbel in Nehren on non-aging paper and bound by Buchbinderei Nädele in Nehren. Printed in Germany. Contents Focus: Logos Schwerpunkt: Logos John Sallis (Boston College) The Play of Translation ................................. 1 Bernhard Zimmermann (Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg) Von der Gewaltherrschaft des Logos. Die Logos-Theorie des Sophisten Gorgias .................................. 15 Günter Figal (Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg) Die Offenheit des Logos ................................ 28 Anna Novokhatko (Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg) Early Greek text exegesis: Premises and Terminology ............ 39 Jens Halfwassen (Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) „Die Flucht in die Logoi“. Platons Kritik am Naturalismus ....... 69 Gert-Jan van der Heiden (Radboud University Nijmegen) To Speak for the Speechless. On Erwin Mortier’s While the Gods Were Sleeping ......................................... 84 Jennifer Mensch (Western Sydney University) Songs of Nature. From Philosophy of Language to Philosophical Anthropology in Herder and Humboldt ..................... 95 Theodore George (Texas A&M University) Birth cry – or, the hermeneutics of facticity , from the finitude of language to the body in pain ........................... 110 VI Contents Topic: Work and Leisure Thema: Arbeit und Muße Johannes Achill Niederhauser (University of Warwick) Cum Dignitate Otium. On the Possibility of Dignified Idleness ..... 127 Christoph Schuringa (New College of the Humanities London) Animal Laborans. Arendt and Weil on Marx .................. 141 Joseph R. Shafer (University of Warwick) The Active Leisure of the Letter in Jacques Rancière ............ 156 Benjamin Varas (King’s College London) Nietzsche on Leisure and the Tasks of Moral Philosophy ......... 174 Contributions/Beiträge Burkhard Liebsch (Forschungsinstitut für Philosophie Hannover) Zur Tradition der Hermeneutik in der Gegenwart einer politischen Kultur des Dissenses. Skizze einer polemogenen Problemlage ...... 185 Werner Stegmaier (Universität Greifswald) Spielräume der Demokratie. Orientierung in Moral und Politik .... 216 Authors and Editors .................................... 233 Index of Names ....................................... 235 Index of Subjects ...................................... 237 1 Focus: Logos Schwerpunkt: Logos The Play of Translation by John Sallis (Boston College) In writing about translation, it will not be easy to keep things from getting tangled. In particular, it will not be easy to keep the discourse itself from getting mixed up with its topic. It will not be easy to produce a discourse capable of remaining simply distinct, completely apart, from what the dis- course is about. In other words, it will not be easy to write about translation without getting entangled in translation, without getting caught up in trans- lating translation. For even simply to explain what translation is, to interpret the meaning of the word, is in a sense – in one of the primary senses of the word – to translate. One will not succeed in extricating oneself completely from the intricacies of translation; that is, one will be inescapably drawn into the entanglement of translating translation, even as one also draws away, distancing oneself from this doubling, seeking to disentangle oneself. The pretense of a discourse on translation that would be uncontaminated by translation cannot, then, be sustained. Forthrightness would dictate ac- knowledging the entanglement and inscribing the discourse within it. Yet, even such an inscription will prove incapable of stabilizing the sense of translation, of delimiting it by enframing it within firm limits. Its sense will overreach such would-be limits, and slippage and mutation will set in. For the most part translation is undertaken without reflection on the structure by which it is determined. One simply goes about translating, directing one’s attention to the original expression while weighing various expressions by which it might be translated. Yet, even in this case, a certain understanding of the nature of translation is tacitly operative. But what is fundamentally involved in the transition from an expression to its translation remains unconsidered. One simply focuses on carrying out the transition and producing a translation that can be acknowledged – that will be ac- knowledged by oneself and others – as being appropriate. Or one might aspire to fashion a translation that exceeds being merely appropriate or that proves to be appropriate to a higher degree. 2 John Sallis The transition constitutive of translation is seldom prescribed in advance and in its entirety in such a way that carrying it out would be a mere me- chanical process. On the contrary, in most cases there is operative a play- fulness – for instance, a wavering between various possibilities, an openness eliciting others, summoning the possible to such an extent that this playful- ness shapes the course of the translation, rendering its formation tentative and exploratory rather than simply definitive. As with all sorts of play, the player tends to lose himself in the play, to be taken up into it rather than exercising mastery over it; thus, the very structure of play – and of trans- lation as play – is such that it resists being reduced to a subjective activity in full control, exercising mastery as though all that emerged in the play were merely an object gradually being constituted by the subject. Insofar as it is playful, translation follows a course that is not prescribed; rather, the player must submit to a movement of to-and-fro by which this course is laid out only as it is also being followed. While, to be sure, texts do not translate themselves, neither is translation produced by spontaneous acts of a detached subject. Translating takes place between passive and active, and, if such were intact in modern Western languages, would best be expressed in the middle voice. The delimitation that was to become the classical concept of translation was first formulated within the orbit of Greek philosophy. To the extent that Western thought remained within this orbit – or at least never entirely escaped it – the classical concept continued to govern the understanding of translation throughout much of the history of philosophy. In order to the- matize the classical determination, it will be expedient first of all to identify the specific questions to which the classical concept constitutes a response. Here already, in the transition to these questions and the classical response to them, translation will itself necessarily undergo translation. To translate something is to convey it across an interval. Such, at least, is the word’s most general signification. This signification is itself conveyed – that is, translated – across a certain historical interval by the word’s etymo- logy. Its Latin root translatus was used as the past participle of transfero, to carry or bear across
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Facing Nature: the Infinite in the Flesh
    Facing Nature: The Infinite in the Flesh Robert Daniel Victorin-Vangerud, B.A., M.Div. This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of. Murdoch University Perth, Western Australia 2004 I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research. ------------------------------------- Robert Daniel Victorin-Vangerud i Abstract “Facing Nature: The Infinite in the Flesh” by Robert Victorin-Vangerud This thesis explores the relation between two interpretations of chôra, drawn from a reading of Plato’s Timaeus. The first I label the elemental chôra. The second, I call the social chôra. The first chapter addresses the elements in Ionian philosophy, with an eye toward the political and social backdrop of the important cosmological notion of isonomia, law of equals. Here social and elemental are continuous. Chapter two looks at the next phase of Presocratic thought, Elea, specifically Parmenides and his influence on later thought, then turns to Heidegger’s reading of Parmenides’ through the key word of alêtheia. Finally, I offer a reading of Parmenides through a different key word— trust. The third chapter examines Plato’s cosmology in the Timaeus, focusing on the way the beginning of this dialogue inflects the dialogue in a political/social direction, putting the social chôra in tension with the elemental chôra that the body of the Timaeus’ discusses. In the fourth chapter, which examines the Phaedrus, this tension is inverted, since this dialogue on writing and justice set in what proves to be the mesmerizing and erotic elemental milieu of the world outside the walls of the polis. The second half of the dissertation turns to some modern thinkers within the phenomenological tradition or its wake who write about elementals.
    [Show full text]
  • Kant and Heidegger on the Issue of Displacement
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1990 The Problem of the Imagination for Subjectivity: Kant and Heidegger on the Issue of Displacement Richard Findler Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Findler, Richard, "The Problem of the Imagination for Subjectivity: Kant and Heidegger on the Issue of Displacement" (1990). Dissertations. 2912. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2912 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1990 Richard Findler THE PROBLEM OF THE IMAGINATION FOR SUBJECTIVITY: KANT AND HEIDEGGER ON THE ISSUE OF DISPLACEMENT by Richard Findler A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy .'' ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I cannot go into my past and thank everyone who has in some way contributed to my dissertation, so let me thank those people who have directly contributed to it. First, I would like to thank Dr. John Sallis for having directed my dissertation. The insights and instruction I have received from him have proven to be invaluable, and there is no way I can truly thank him for everything he has done for me over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Featured Title with RESPECT for NATURE Living As Part of The
    Philosophy featured title featured title THE SCIENCE WITH RESPECT OF KNOWING FOR NATURE J. G. Fichte’s 1804 Lectures Living as Part on the Wissenschaftslehre of the Natural World J. G. Fichte J. Claude Evans Translated and with an Introduction by Walter E. Wright Explores how humans can take the lives of animals and plants while maintaining The first English translation of Fichte’s a proper respect both for ecosystems second set of 1804 lectures on the and for those who live in them. Wissenschaftslehre. We eat, inevitably, at the expense of other living creatures. How can Considered by some to be his most important text, this series we take the lives of plants and animals while maintaining a proper of lectures given by Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762–1814) at his respect for both ecosystems and the individuals who live in them— home in Berlin in 1804 is widely regarded as the most perspicuous including ourselves? In this book philosopher J. Claude Evans presentation of his fundamental philosophy. Now available challenges much of the accepted wisdom in environmental ethics in English, this translation provides in striking and original and argues that human participation in the natural cycles of life language Fichte’s exploration of the transcendental foundations and death can have positive moral value. of experience and knowing in ways that go beyond Kant and Reinhold and charts a promising, novel pathway With a guide for the nonphilosophical reader, and set against for German Idealism. Through a close examination of this work the background of careful and penetrating critiques one can see that Fichte’s thought is much more than a way station of Albert Schweitzer’s principle of reverence for life and Paul Taylor’s between Kant and Hegel, and thus it makes the case for Fichte’s philosophy of respect for nature, Evans uses hunting and catch- independent philosophical importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a New Foundationalism
    Toward a New Foundationalism Toward a New Foundationalism: From Carnap to Kripke, and from Husserl to Sallis By Bernard Freydberg Toward a New Foundationalism: From Carnap to Kripke, and from Husserl to Sallis By Bernard Freydberg This book first published 2021 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2021 by Bernard Freydberg All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-6205-0 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-6205-9 For Akiko, Forever. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ................................................................................... ix Foreword .................................................................................................... x Prelude ..................................................................................................... xiii On the Way to Ruling Image: Rethinking two Canonical Platonic Tropes A Note on the Unusual Tone of this Book ............................................... xvi Rudolph Carnap .......................................................................................... 1 William James ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Poetic Imagination in Heidegger and Schelling
    The Poetic Imagination in Heidegger and Schelling Author: Christopher S. Yates Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/3056 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2011 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Department of Philosophy THE POETIC IMAGINATION IN HEIDEGGER AND SCHELLING a dissertation by CHRISTOPHER S. YATES submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May, 2011 © copyright by CHRISTOPHER S. YATES 2011 ii The Poetic Imagination in Heidegger and Schelling Christopher Yates Advisor: John Sallis Readers: Richard Kearney, Jason Wirth Abstract This dissertation investigates the importance of the imagination in the thought of F.W. J. Schelling and Martin Heidegger, and argues that Heidegger’s later philosophy cannot be understood properly without appreciating Schelling’s central importance for him. It is increasingly recognized today that Schelling, who had long been overlooked, is an important figure in post-Kantian German Idealism. However, his significance for Heidegger’s concentration on the creative character of thought remains undervalued. I argue that, by tracing the theme of imagination in these thinkers, the milieu of Schelling’s absolute idealism and that of Heidegger’s hermeneutic phenomenlogy may be understood as distinct discourses that nevertheless share in a profound impulse to overcome sensible- intelligible and subject-object dualisms and retrieve and refine the productive and projective character of reason. This impulse is first evident in both thinkers’ attention to the role of imagination in Kant’s critical project (for Schelling, cir.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 December 2015 JOHN SALLIS Curriculum Vitae Academic Address
    1 December 2015 JOHN SALLIS Curriculum Vitae Academic Address: Home Address: Department of Philosophy 22 Eliot Hill Road Boston College Natick, MA 01760 Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 USA USA Tel.: 508-647-3791 Tel.: 617-552-3218 or 4051 Fax: 617-552-3874 E-mail: [email protected] I. EDUCATION A. POST-DOCTORAL STUDY AND RESEARCH Hegel-Archiv der Ruhr-Universität Bochum: 1992-93. Université de Paris: 1982-83; 1988-89. Universität Freiburg i. Br.: 1970 (SS); 1974-75; 1979 (SS). B. GRADUATE STUDY Tulane University, 1960-64 Ph.D. 1964 Dissertation: The Concept of World (Director: Edward Ballard) M.A. 1962 Columbia University, 1959-60 Mathematics and Logic C. UNDERGRADUATE STUDY University of Arkansas, 1956-59 B.A. with honors 1959, Mathematics II. TEACHING POSITIONS 2 A. POSITIONS HELD Boston College 2005- Frederick J. Adelmann Professor of Philosophy The Pennsylvania State University 2000-2005 Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Philosophy 1996-2000 Liberal Arts Professor of Philosophy Vanderbilt University 1990-95 W. Alton Jones Professor of Philosophy Loyola University of Chicago 1983-90 Arthur J. Schmitt Professor of Philosophy 1985-88 Director, Continental Philosophy Program Duquesne University 1978-83 Chairman, Department of Philosophy 1970-83 Professor of Philosophy 1966-70 Associate Professor of Philosophy University of the South (Sewanee) 1964-66 Instructor in Philosophy B. VISITING POSITIONS (Teaching and Research) Wuhan University (China) 2014 University of Bergen (Norway) 2013 Staffordshire University (UK) 2010-12 Universität Freiburg (Germany) 2002-03; 2008; 2014 Universität Tübingen (Germany) 2001 Warwick University 1989 III. ACADEMIC HONORS AND AWARDS 1. Senior Fellowship, Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies, Universität of Freiburg (March-July 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Robert Dean Metcalf
    Metcalf - 1 CURRICULUM VITAE ROBERT DEAN METCALF Education 2000 Ph.D. in Philosophy, The Pennsylvania State University Dissertation: “The Fear and Shame of Socratic Dialogue” Chair: John Sallis 1995 M.A. in Philosophy, Vanderbilt University 1992 B.A., cum laude, in Philosophy, Brigham Young University Areas of Specialization Ancient Philosophy, Hermeneutics, 19th-20th century Continental Philosophy Areas of Competence Ethics, Philosophy of Religion Professional Experience 2007-present Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Colorado Denver 2010-2013 Department Chair, Philosophy, University of Colorado Denver 2000-2007 Assistant Professor of Philosophy, University of Colorado Denver Articles Published (Peer-Reviewed) “Cormac McCarthy and the Bioethical,” forthcoming in Philosophy and the Contemporary World, Special Issue: ‘America the Bioethical,’ edited by Charles Harvey & Christian Matheis (expected 2016). “‘The Ruined Shack’: Language and Being-at-Home in McCarthy’s Outer Dark and Heidegger,” in Philosophical Perspectives on Cormac McCarthy: Beyond Reckoning, edited by Chris Eagle, London: Routledge (expected 2016). “Syngrammatology in Plato’s Statesman,” in Plato’s Statesman: Dialectic, Myth and Politics, edited by John Sallis, forthcoming from SUNY Press (expected 2016). “Physis in Presocratic Thought: Seeking with Xenophanes,” forthcoming in A Companion to Ancient Philosophy, edited by Sean Kirkland & Eric Sanday, Northwestern University Press (expected 2016). “Philosophy as a Work of Memory,” forthcoming in The Edinburgh Critical History of Greek and Roman Philosophy, edited by Giuseppe Cambiano &Alexandra Lianeri (expected 2016). “The Situation of Epistemology in Plato’s Theaetetus,” Epoché 19(2), Spring 2015: 241-260. Metcalf - 2 “Living with the Matter Itself: The Practice of Philosophy Reexamined,” Philosophy in the Contemporary World 21(1), Summer 2014: 41-53.
    [Show full text]
  • John Protevi 1 April 18, 2008
    John Protevi 1 April 18, 2008 JOHN PROTEVI 1.1 EDUCATION Loyola University of Chicago PhD (Philosophy) May 1990 The Pennsylvania State University MA (Philosophy) May 1986 The Pennsylvania State University MA (English) May 1984 The Pennsylvania State University BA (Philosophy) May 1981 1.2 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Louisiana State University Associate Professor 8/04- Louisiana State University Assistant Professor 1/01-8/04 Louisiana State University Instructor 8/96-12/96 & 8/97- 12/00 University of Warwick Leverhulme Research Fellow 9/95-7/96 Louisiana State University Visiting Assistant Professor 8/94-5/95 Villanova University Instructor 1/93-5/94 Boston University Instructor 8/91-5/92 University of Memphis Visiting Assistant Professor 8/90-5/91 1.3 RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITY 1.3.1: RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS 1.3.1.1: BOOKS Political Physiology: Imbrications of the Social and the Somatic. University of Minnesota Press. 2009. Forthcoming. Deleuze and Geophilosophy: A Guide and Glossary. With Mark Bonta. Edinburgh University Press, 2004. Political Physics: Deleuze, Derrida and the Body Politic. London: Athlone Press, 2001 Time and Exteriority: Aristotle, Heidegger, Derrida. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 1994 1.3.1.2: SHORTER WORKS “Geohistory and Hydro-bio-politics,” in Jeffrey Bell, ed., Deleuze and History. Edinburgh University Press, 2008. Forthcoming. “Beyond Autopoiesis: Inflections of Emergence and Politics in the Work of Francisco Varela.” In Bruce Clarke and Mark Hansen, eds. Emergence and Embodiment: Essays in Neocybernetics. Duke University Press, 2008. Forthcoming. “Affect, Agency and Responsibility: The Act of Killing in the Age of Cyborgs,” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7.2 (2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Michael E. Zimmerman
    Michael E. Zimmerman Professor of Philosophy, retired University of Colorado at Boulder 280 UCB Boulder, CO 80309-0280 Tel: 303-492-5784 Fax: 303-735-2624 [email protected] Education: Louisiana State University l964-68, BA, Philosophy Tulane University l969-72, MA, Philosophy l'Université Catholique de Louvain l972-73, Fulbright-Hays Fellow Tulane University l973-74, PhD, Philosophy Dissertation: The Concept of the Self in Heidegger's Being and Time, directed by Edward G. Ballard. Professional Appointments: Denison University 1974-75 Assistant Professor Tulane University 1975-78 Assistant Professor 1978-83 Associate Professor 1983 to present Professor 1989-93, 1999-2002, 2004-2006 Chair Tulane School of Medicine 1984 to 2006 Clinical Professor of Psychology California School of Professional Psychology (Berkeley) 1982 Visiting Professor of Psychology University of Colorado, Boulder 2006- Professor of Philosophy Environmental Studies affiliate 2006-2010 Director, Center for Humanities and the Arts 2 Areas of Major Research Interest Environmental Philosophy and Policy Philosophy of Technology, including Artificial Intelligence Heidegger, Nietzsche Integral Theory Buddhism Awards, Fellowships, Offices, and Editorial Board Membership: Woodrow Wilson Fellow, l968-69. NDEA Title IV Fellow, Tulane University, l970-72. Fulbright-Hays Fellow, Belgium, 1972-73 Secretary-Convenor, Heidegger Conference, Tulane University, l977 Governing Board of Collegium Phaenomenologicum, 1976-78 Board of Advisors, Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology Mortar Board Award for Excellence in Teaching, May, l979 Newcomb College Student Senate Award for Student Involvement, l980 Tulane University Summer Grants: l976, l977, l978 Professor-in-Charge, Tulane/Newcomb Junior Year Abroad Program, Great Britain, 1979-80 Tulane-Mellon Summer Stipend for New Course Development, l98l National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) Summer Stipend, l98l Director, Tulane Honors Program, 1981-82 Faculty Advisor, UCAM (United Campuses to Prevent Nuclear War), 1982-86.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Naas Curriculum Vitae
    1 Michael Naas Curriculum Vitae DePaul University Department of Philosophy 2352 N. Clifton Ave. Chicago, IL 60614 [email protected] Teaching Appointments • DePaul University, Professor, 2001 to present. • DePaul University, Associate Professor, 1996 to 2001. • DePaul University, Assistant Professor, 1990 to 1996. • New York University, Lecturer, 1989-90. Administrative Positions • Department Chairperson, Philosophy, 2001-2, 2010-16. • Director of Graduate Studies, Philosophy, 1995-2000, 2002-3. • Director of Undergraduate Studies, Philosophy, 1994-95, 2004-5. • Program Director, Foreign Study, Athens, spring 1994 & 1998. • Program Director, Foreign Study, Paris, spring 1999 & 2004. Education Ph.D. State University of New York at Stony Brook. May, 1990. Dissertation: Turning: From Persuasion to Philosophy, Hugh J. Silverman (Director), Mary C. Rawlinson, David B. Allison, Pietro Pucci (Cornell University). D.E.A. Diplôme d’Études Approfondies, Université de Paris I (Sorbonne), 1987. Thesis: “Le ton de la critique chez Maurice Blanchot,” Director: Olivier Revault d’Allonnes. Seminars: Jacques Derrida, Julia Kristeva, Françoise Collin, Jean Cohen. Mention: Très Bien, 16/20. 2 B.A. College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, MA, 1982. Magna Cum Laude. Major: English and American literature. Honors and Awards • Commandeur dans l’Ordre des Palmes Académiques, 2015. • Spirit of Inquiry Award, DePaul University, 2012. • Distinguished Visiting Professor, University of Alberta, Canada, March 2010. • Appointed Fellow at Ph.D. Center at Chicago Theological Seminary, 2007-present. • Chevalier dans l’Ordre des Palmes Académiques, 2005. • Excellence in Teaching Award, DePaul University, 1996. • DePaul University Competitive Research Summer Grant, 1993, 1996, 1999, 2001, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009. • DePaul University Competitive Leave Research Grant, Spring 1995, 2001, 2007, Autumn 2016-Winter 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania State University - State College, PA - April 16-18
    2004 Conference Program Pennsylvania State University - State College, PA - April 16-18 Friday, April 16th, 2004 12:00 Registration Board Room 1:15- Welcome 1:30 Nancy Tuana, Intermin Head, Department of Philosophy, Pennsylvania State University 1:30- Session 1 4:50 Chair: Daniel W. Conway, Pennsylvania State University Speaker: Rose Cherubin, George Mason University: "Altheia and Inquiry in Parmenides" . Discussant: J. Kelsey Wood, College of the Holy Cross Speaker: James Eric Butler, Villanova University: "Effluvia: Empedocles Studies" Discussant: Matthew S. Linck, New School University Speaker: William H. Harwood, Pennsylvania State University: "On Nous and the Whole: The Two Sides of Anaxagoras' Janus-faced Physis" Discussant: Jonathan J. Sanford, Franciscan University of Steubenville 4:50- Break 5:15 5:15- Keynote Address 6:30 Chair: Dennis J. Schmidt, Pennsylvania State University Speaker: Walter A. Brogan, Villanova University, "The Role of Contradiction in Early Greek Thinking: On the Way to Aristotle's Aporetic Philosophy" Saturday, April 17th, 2004 9:00- Session 4 12:20 Chair: Peter Warnek, University of Oregon 1. Holly Moore, DePaul University: "Stasis and the Hunt for Justice and Moderation in the City" Discussant: Mark Schiffman, Villanova University 2. Sara Brill, Pennsylvania State University: "Diagnosis and the Divided Line: Pharmacological Concerns in Plato's Republic"" Discussant: John Vielkind, Marshall University 3. Bernard Freydberg, Slippery Rock University: "Rereading Theaetetus 148e-10" Discussant: Gary Alan Scott, Loyola College, Maryland 12:20- Lunch 1:40 1:40- Session 3 5:00 Chair: Robert Metcalf, University of Colorado at Denver 1. P. Christopher Smith, University of Massachusetts, Lowell: "Poetry, Socratic Dialectic, and the Desire for the Beautiful in Plato's Symposium" Discussant: Heidi Northwood, Nazareth College of Rochester 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Abdullah Doctoral Dissertation.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts TIME AND CRITIQUE IN EARLY HEIDEGGER AND DELEUZE A Dissertation in Philosophy by Ayesha Abdullah © 2015 Ayesha Abdullah Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2015 ii The dissertation of Ayesha Abdullah was reviewed and approved* by the following: Leonard Lawlor Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Philosophy Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Robert Bernasconi Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Philosophy and African American Studies Claire Colebrook Edwin Erle Spares Professor of English Sarah Clark Miller Associate Professor of Philosophy and Women’s Studies Amy Allen Professor of Philosophy Head of the Department of Philosophy *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii Abstract My dissertation is on the influence of Immanuel Kant's notions of finitude and critique on Martin Heidegger, Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze’s early works. Heidegger, Foucault and Deleuze, under Nietzsche's influence, determine that finitude and the concept of critique must be reoriented such that it no longer takes traditional ethical and anthropological assumptions as its starting point. Indeed, this necessary reorientation is both Foucault and Deleuze's interpretation of the well-known Nietzschean catch phrase “we must overcome man”. In this dissertation, I contend that Heidegger, Foucault, and Deleuze’s respective ontologies develop or harbor a concept of finitude purposed to furnish a path to a new type of critique, a type of thinking that leaves behind the anthropocentrism of our paradigm. For Heidegger, we must follow the central root of the faculties to their origin in the transcendental faculty of the imagination.
    [Show full text]