DOCSLIB.ORG

MYCENAEAN and CYPRIOT LATE BRONZE AGE CERAMIC IMPORTS to KOMMOS: an Investigation by Neutron Activation Analysis Author(S): Jonathan E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MYCENAEAN and CYPRIOT LATE BRONZE AGE CERAMIC IMPORTS to KOMMOS: an Investigation by Neutron Activation Analysis Author(S): Jonathan E MYCENAEAN AND CYPRIOT LATE BRONZE AGE CERAMIC IMPORTS TO KOMMOS: An Investigation by Neutron Activation Analysis Author(s): Jonathan E. Tomlinson, Jeremy B. Rutter and Sandra M. A. Hoffmann Source: Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens, Vol. 79, No. 2 (April-June 2010), pp. 191-231 Published by: The American School of Classical Studies at Athens Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40835485 . Accessed: 18/03/2014 10:14 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The American School of Classical Studies at Athens is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 71.168.218.10 on Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:14:06 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions HESPERIA 79 (2010) MYCENAEAN AND Pages IÇI-2JI CYPRIOT LATE BRONZE AGE CERAMIC IMPORTS TO KOMMOS An Investigation by Neutron Activation Analysis ABSTRACT The resultsof a small-scaleprogram of neutronactivation analysis of 69 ceramicfragments from the Minoan harbortown of Kommos are presented andcritically evaluated. Prior to analysis,the vessels represented in the sample werethought to be importsfrom outside of Crete,manufactured either on Cyprusor in theMycenaean cultural sphere. The chemicalanalyses support theidentifications of thevessels as importsfrom the regions in questionin roughly80% ofthe cases. They further suggest that the vast majority of these ceramicimports were produced in a comparativelysmall number of produc- tioncenters. INTRODUCTION The Minoan harbortown known by the modernname of Kommosis lo- catedon Crete'ssouth-central coast, just to thenorth of the Hellenistic and Romanharbor of Mátala.1 The sitewas excavatedfor a totalof 15 seasons, from1976 to 1985 and againfrom 1991 to 1995,by an internationalteam directedby J. W. Shaw of theUniversity of Toronto under the auspicesof theAmerican School of Classical Studiesat Athens.The resultsof these excavationshave been publishedover the past two decades in a seriesof fivevolumes (one in twoparts, for a totalof sixseparate books), and a final 1. The authorswould like to thank Josephand Maria Shaw,codirectors Pfaffand havebeen reformatted for theeditor of Hesperia as wellas Priscilla ofthe Kommos Excavations and co- thispublication by Tina Ross.The Keswaniand thetwo anonymous Hes- editorsof the associated publications. photographswere taken by Taylor periareviewers for numerous helpful Forsuggesting the collaboration that Dabney. suggestions,including the recommen- has resultedin thisarticle, we owe a The contributionsof the authors dationto add illustrativematerial. For specialnote of thanks to Elizabeth areas follows:the opening sections, activeencouragement throughout the French.For successfully locating and discussion,and conclusionswere writ- extendedpublication process, especially makingavailable the relevant Kommos tenby Jeremy Rutter, the section on forthe latest versions of the site plans analyticaldata in Manchesterlong chemicalanalysis by Sandra Hoffmann, (Figs. 1,2) and thefinancial support afterthe analyses were run, we are and thesections on statisticalanalysis to publishthe second of these in color, verygrateful to John Prag. The draw- and resultsby Jonathan Tomlinson. we gratefullyacknowledge our debt to ingswere initially prepared by Julia © The American School of Classical Studies at Athens This content downloaded from 71.168.218.10 on Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:14:06 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions [Ç2 J. E. TOMLINSON, J. B. RUTTER, AND S. M. A. HOFFMANN 0 5 10 15 20 25 m - 1. Site of Kommos. Josephw.shaw giuliana bianco 2010 Figure plan G. Bianco.Courtesy J. W. Shaw This content downloaded from 71.168.218.10 on Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:14:06 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions LATE BRONZE AGE CERAMIC IMPORTS TO KOMMOS 193 Figure2. Periodplan ofthe South- volumein two parts is currentlyinpreparation.2 The purposeof the present ernArea at identified Kommos, articleis to reporton theresults of a proveniencestudy of Late Bronze in Figure 1 as the Greek Sanctuary. ceramics to tothe site. Neutron activation G. Bianco.Courtesy J.W. Shaw Age thought representimports analysis(NAA) wasundertaken in orderto assessthis possibility. Excavationsatthe site were concentrated inthree distinct sectors, from northto south,the Hilltop, Central Hillside, and SouthernArea (Fig. 1, inwhich the Southern Area is labeled"Greek Sanctuary")- In the first two sectorsthe remains dated exclusively from the Final Neolithic and Bronze Ageeras, between approximately 3500 and 1200 b.c. In theSouthern Area (Fig.2) theprehistoric remains were overlaid, after an apparentoccupa- tionalhiatus of roughly a century, by an extra-urbansanctuary that was in continuoususe from the endof the Bronze 1100 until 2. KommosI-V. In preparationare very Age (ca. b.c.) Shawand Shaw,forthcoming, and Rut- RomanImperial times. The periodmost abundantly represented at the ter,forthcoming. siteis theLate BronzeAge (LBA), or Late Minoan(LM) era,to which This content downloaded from 71.168.218.10 on Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:14:06 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 194 J- E- TOMLINSON, J. B. RUTTER, AND S. M. A. HOFFMANN a substantialnumber of residential buildings in theHilltop and Central Hillsidesectors belong. In theSouthern Area a seriesof LM monumental structures(BuildingT below Buildings N andP) lieto the south of a major east-westroad, on thenorth side of which is a particularlywell-appointed domesticbuilding (House X) thatincorporated a shrine during its later phasesof use. IMPORTEDPOTTERY AT LATEBRONZE AGE KOMMOS Duringthe four-century span of the Late BronzeAge, Kommos enjoyed an exceptionalrange of contacts, as attestedby the presence of imported ceramics,with regions both within and beyond the Aegean.3 At thetime ofwriting, vessels originating from the Greek mainland, at least two west- ernAegean islands (Kythera and Melos, possibly also Naxos and Thera), southwesternAnatolia, Sardinia, Egypt, various locales along the Syro- Palestiniancoast, Cyprus, and possibly portions of central Anatolia have beenrecognized. This extraordinary body of evidence for maritime contacts withregions of the Mediterranean outside of Crete shows that Kommos was a uniquelywell-connected trading emporium.4 It was one ofa small numberof sites throughout the eastern Mediterranean that functioned as majornodes of intercultural exchange during an era of increasingly intense culturalinteraction, especially between ca. 1450and 1200 b.c. These sites includeEnkomi, Kition, and Hala SultanTekke on the southcoast of Cyprus,Ras Shamraand its port at Minetel-Beida in coastalSyria, Tell AbuHawam at thenorth end of the Carmel Ridge in Israel,and perhaps alsoTroy and Tiryns within the Aegean. Althoughthe external contacts of Kommos were already impressive priorto theend ofthe Neopalatial era, ca. 1450 b.c.,when it probably servedas theprincipal port of entry for goods entering the polity controlled fromeither Phaistos (in Protopalatialtimes) or AyiaTriada (from the developedLM IA phaseuntil near the end of LM IB),5the site reached itsacme as an entrepôtin LM II-LM IIIA2 Early,ca. 1450-1375b.c. Duringthis relatively brief interval of two to threegenerations, when the siteof Knossoswas hometo theonly known functioning palace center on Crete,Kommos served as theprincipal southern port of the Knossian administration.This roleno doubtaccounts for the factthat the only EgyptianNew Kingdom ceramic containers known from the Aegean come fromKommos and were recovered from strata datable between 1500/1475 and1375/1350 b.c. 3. The principalpublications of duringthe LBA areextremely rare, ofthis site has unfortunatelybeen lost ceramicimports to Late Minoan arguablybeing limited to Troy in the to archaeologicalexploration due to the Kommoshave been Watrous 1985; northeastand Tiryns in thesouthwest, moderndevelopment of the harbor at KommosIII, pp. 149-183; Cline 1994, butin thecase ofthe latter, they are Herakleion. esp.p. 106; Knappand Cherry1994, evidentonly from the LH IIIA through 5. Fora convenientchart laying out pp. 138-141; Rutter1999, 2006b. The earlyLH IIIC phases,ca. 1400 through developmentsat thesite of Kommos lastof these offers the most up-to-date 1150 b.c. withinthe broader context of events andwide-ranging overview of the evi- 4. The northernharbor of Knossos throughoutthe Mesara plain of south- dence.Other Aegean sites with com- at Poros-Katsamba was almostcertainly ernCrete during the Bronze Age, see parablywidespread external contacts as wellconnected as Kommos,but most Shaw2006, pp. 866-871,table 5:1. This content downloaded from 71.168.218.10 on Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:14:06 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions LATE BRONZE AGE CERAMIC IMPORTS TO KOMMOS 195 Despitethe wealth of importedceramics from Kommos identified alreadyby Watrous in his 1992 publicationof the site'sLBA pottery, onlya smallselection of these imports had been specifically targeted for petrologicaland trace-elementanalyses prior to 1995.6Up
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kretan Cult and Customs, Especially in the Classical and Hellenistic Periods: a Religious, Social, and Political Study
    i Kretan cult and customs, especially in the Classical and Hellenistic periods: a religious, social, and political study Thesis submitted for degree of MPhil Carolyn Schofield University College London ii Declaration I, Carolyn Schofield, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been acknowledged in the thesis. iii Abstract Ancient Krete perceived itself, and was perceived from outside, as rather different from the rest of Greece, particularly with respect to religion, social structure, and laws. The purpose of the thesis is to explore the bases for these perceptions and their accuracy. Krete’s self-perception is examined in the light of the account of Diodoros Siculus (Book 5, 64-80, allegedly based on Kretan sources), backed up by inscriptions and archaeology, while outside perceptions are derived mainly from other literary sources, including, inter alia, Homer, Strabo, Plato and Aristotle, Herodotos and Polybios; in both cases making reference also to the fragments and testimonia of ancient historians of Krete. While the main cult-epithets of Zeus on Krete – Diktaios, associated with pre-Greek inhabitants of eastern Krete, Idatas, associated with Dorian settlers, and Kretagenes, the symbol of the Hellenistic koinon - are almost unique to the island, those of Apollo are not, but there is good reason to believe that both Delphinios and Pythios originated on Krete, and evidence too that the Eleusinian Mysteries and Orphic and Dionysiac rites had much in common with early Kretan practice. The early institutionalization of pederasty, and the abduction of boys described by Ephoros, are unique to Krete, but the latter is distinct from rites of initiation to manhood, which continued later on Krete than elsewhere, and were associated with different gods.
    [Show full text]
  • Contacts: Crete, Egypt, and the Near East Circa 2000 B.C
    Malcolm H. Wiener major Akkadian site at Tell Leilan and many of its neighboring sites were abandoned ca. 2200 B.C.7 Many other Syrian sites were abandoned early in Early Bronze (EB) IVB, with the final wave of destruction and aban- donment coming at the end of EB IVB, Contacts: Crete, Egypt, about the end of the third millennium B.c. 8 In Canaan there was a precipitous decline in the number of inhabited sites in EB III— and the Near East circa IVB,9 including a hiatus posited at Ugarit. In Cyprus, the Philia phase of the Early 2000 B.C. Bronze Age, "characterised by a uniformity of material culture indicating close connec- tions between different parts of the island"10 and linked to a broader eastern Mediterra- This essay examines the interaction between nean interaction sphere, broke down, per- Minoan Crete, Egypt, the Levant, and Ana- haps because of a general collapse of tolia in the twenty-first and twentieth cen- overseas systems and a reduced demand for turies B.c. and briefly thereafter.' Cypriot copper." With respect to Egypt, Of course contacts began much earlier. Donald Redford states that "[t]he incidence The appearance en masse of pottery of Ana- of famine increases in the late 6th Dynasty tolian derivation in Crete at the beginning and early First Intermediate Period, and a of Early Minoan (EM) I, around 3000 B.C.,2 reduction in rainfall and the annual flooding together with some evidence of destructions of the Nile seems to have afflicted northeast and the occupation of refuge sites at the time, Africa with progressive desiccation as the suggests the arrival of settlers from Anatolia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aegean Chapter Viii the Decorative
    H. J. Kantor - Plant Ornament in the Ancient Near East, Chapter VIII: The Decorative Flora of Crete and the Late Helladic Mainland SECTION II: THE AEGEAN CHAPTER VIII THE DECORATIVE FLORA OF CRETE AND THE LATE HELLADIC MAINLAND In the midst of the sea, on the long island of Crete, there dwelt a people, possessors of the fabulous Minoan culture, who are known to have had trade relations with Egypt, and with other Near-Eastern lands. Still farther away towards the north lies the Mainland of Greece, a region that proved itself to be a very hospitable host to the graft of Minoan culture. Before the close of the LH period the ceramic results of this union were to be spread over the Near East in great profusion and it becomes necessary to define the extent of Aegean influence on those traditions of Near-Eastern art that lie within the scope of our topic. Before this is possible a concise summary of the plant ornamentation of the Aegean must be presented.1 This background forms a necessary basis without which the reaction of Aegean plant design on the main development of our story, be it large or small, cannot be determined. 1 A great deal of interest and work has been devoted to the study of Minoan decorative art almost since the beginning of its discovery, and full advantage of this has been taken in the preparation of the present survey. The chief treatments of the subject are as follows: Edith H. Hall, The Decorative Art of Crete in the Bronze Age (Philadelphia, 1907); Ernst Reisinger, Kretische Vasenmalerei vom Kamares bis zum Palast-Stil (Leipzig, Berlin, 1912); Diederich Fimmen, Die Kretisch-Mykenische Kulture (Leipzig, Berlin, 1924), Alois Gotsmich, Entwicklungsgang der Kretischen Ornamentik, Wein, 1923); Frederich Matz, Frühkretische Siegel (Berlin, 1928), covering a much wider field than is indicated by the title; Georg Karo, Die Schachtgräber von Mykenai (Munchen, 1939).
    [Show full text]
  • Permanent Residents 12000 Domesticated Animals, Pottery
    CHRONOLOGY Earliest Evidence Seasonal Gatherers 40,000 End of Ice Age: Permanent Residents 12,000 Domesticated animals, pottery/bead industry 6,000 Bronze Age 2800-1100 Crete dominated Mainland til 1400 when Knossos destroyed Mycenae became dominant 1400-1200 (Trojan War end 12th cent) Sub-Mycenaean Pottery 1100-1000 Proto-Geometric Pottery 1000-900 Mycenaean Inspiration/Geometric Pattern 1st animal figure 975-950 Geometric Pottery 900-700 (balanced composition) Early 900-825 (1st human figures) Middle 825-750 Late 750-700 (heroic stories) Notes: cremation the norm for 10th-8th centuries; burial begins end 8th cent. Sub-Mycenaean 1050-1025 BCE Sub-Mycenaean (Kerameikos 421) Vases ca 1100-950 BCE Proto-Geometric Amphora End 10th-Beginning 9th BCE Proto-Geometric Oinochoe Proto-Geometric Oinochoae Proto-Geometric Amphora Ca. 1000 BCE Proto-Geometric Amphora Proto-Geometric Amphorae Proto-Geometric Amphora (Kerameikos 560) 975-950 BCE Geometric Bronze Horse 750-700 BCE Geometric Centaur End of the 10th BCE Geometric Bronze Man and Centaur 8th BCE 4 3/8” H. Geometric Figurine Ca. 700 BCE 15.5” H Proto-Geometric Amphora (Kerameikos) 900-850 BCE Geometric 9th – 8th BCE Geometric Pyxis Geometric Pyxis Ca. 750 BCE Geometric Cup Water Birds Geometric wine pitcher (oinochoe) with inscription: “He who of all the dancers now performs most lightly [shall have me]” Late Geometric Dipylon Amphora 800-750 B.C.C. (Munich 6080) Geometric Crater Late Geometric Crater ca. 750 BCE (Athens 990) Late Geometric Crater (detail) (New York 14.139.14) Geometric Amphora Late Geometric Oinochoe (Athens, Agora P 4885) Geometric Oinochoe Geometric Amphora Geometric Bowl Geometric Bowl Boeotian Late Geometric Cup 750-725 BCE Geometric Crater from Thebes (Toronto 919.18) Geometric Amphora (detail) Geometric Cup (skyphos) Ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastwards Via Cyprus? the Marked Mycenaean Pottery of Enkomi, Ugarit and Tell Abu Hawam
    Trinity University Digital Commons @ Trinity Classical Studies Faculty Research Classical Studies Department 2004 Eastwards via Cyprus? The Marked Mycenaean Pottery of Enkomi, Ugarit and Tell Abu Hawam Nicolle E. Hirschfeld Trinity University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/class_faculty Part of the Classics Commons Repository Citation Hirschfeld, N. (2004). Eastwards via Cyprus? The marked Mycenaean pottery of Enkomi, Ugarit and Tell Abu Hawam. In J. Balensi, J.-Y. Monchambert, & S. M. Celka (Eds.), Travaux de la Maison de l’Orient et de la Méditerranée: Vol. 41. La ceŕ amique mycenienné de l'Egeé au levant: hommage a ̀ Vronwy Hankey (pp. 97-104). Maison de l'Orient et de la Mediterŕ anee-Jeań Pouilloux. This Contribution to Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Classical Studies Department at Digital Commons @ Trinity. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classical Studies Faculty Research by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Trinity. For more information, please contact [email protected]. La ceramique mycenienne de l'tgee au Levant TMO 41, Maison de !'Orient, Lyon, 2004 EASTWARDS VIA CYPRUS? THE MARKED MYCENAEAN POTTERY OF ENKOMI, UGARIT, AND TELL ABU HA WAM Nicolle HIRSCHFELD * ABSTRACT Based on her study of distribution patterns, Vronwy Hankey suggested that Cyprus or Cypriots played some role in the trade of Mycenaean pottery eastwards to the Levant. She also noted that some of the Mycenaean pottery which reached both Cyprus and the Near East can-ied marks incised on handles or painted on bases. This paper examines the possible relationships between the marks, Mycenaean pottery, Cyprus, and the trade in Late Bronze Age ceramics.
    [Show full text]
  • Minoan Art First Term 1958 at the Southern End of the Aegean Sea
    Minoan Art First Term 1958 At the southern end of the Aegean Sea, Crete was situated in an excellent geographical position to receive cultural stimulus from Mesopotamia and the Near East, and also from the north, from Europe: and it enjoyed the natural protection afforded by the sea. And during the Bronze Age (an archaeological period which in the Near Eastern countries dares from around 3000BC to 1000BC) a flourishing civilization with strong individual characteristics arose and flourished. The rise of England, in relation to Northern Europe, many centuries later affords a rough parallel to the rise of Crete in the Eastern Mediterranean during the Bronze Age. Let us look at a map of the area.* Nothing was known about the culture of Ancient Crete until Sir Arthur Evans purchased the site of the temple of Knossos in 1900 and began to uncover the ruins of the huge Palace of Knossos. He was following up the work of Heinrich Schliemann who had begun excavations at Troy in northern Asia Minor and later a Tiryns and Mycenae in the south o Greece, in 1890s. Evans revealed the presence of a highly civilized and flourishing Bronze Age civilization in Crete which he called Minoan, from the King Minos of Greek legend. The Minoan culture was found to be, unlike the great kingdoms of the Near East and Egypt, an essentially maritime culture based upon maritime supremacy in the eastern Mediterranean Minoan vessels traded with Egypt, the Levant, Cyprus and Asia Minor. In consequence the culture owes much to Egypt and the Near East, but the Minoans stamped their art with a strong personal quality of its own.
    [Show full text]
  • A Great Minoan Triangle: the Changing
    SCRIPTA MEDITERRANEA, Vol. VI (1985) A GREAT MINOAN TRIANGLE: THE CHANGING CHARACTER OF PHAISTOS, HAGIA TRIADHA, AND KOMMOS DURING THE MIDDLE MINOAN IB-LATE MINOAN III PERIODS Philip Betancourt Kommos, Hagia Triadha, and Phaistos hold many of the clues to the historical interpretation of the Messara in the second millennium B.C. I have benefited from discussions with numerous persons in the formation of these observations, especially my Italian colleague Vincenzo La Rosa. Phaistos, at the western end of the fertile Messara Plain, is strategically situated to administer the plain's rich agricultural production. Hagia Triadha is on the last hill between Phaistos and the Libyan Sea. Kommos, located to the south, lies at an excellent harbour near a good fresh water spring, with a productive hinterland of small plots and hills. The preeminent position of these three sites in the second millennium may be contrasted with the situation in earlier times. The first known settlement of this part of Crete dates to the Final Neolithic.(1) Phaistos and Kommos were already settled by this period, along with many other small raised hills used as open village sites. The earliest habitation of Hagia Triadha is less well known, but certainly by the Early Bronze Age it was settled as well because its residents were buried in two nearby tholos tombs (Banti 1930-31). Before Middle Minoan IB, we have little archaeological evidence to single out these three sites as among the most important sites of southern Crete. It is possible we are misguided by the clearing and levelling operations of MM I-II that may have destroyed much of the earlier remains, but it is clear that wealth was shared more generally within the Messara in EM and MM than it was in later times.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Bronze Age Kommos
    SCRIPTA MEDITERRANEA, Vol. VI (1985) LATE BRONZE AGE KOMMOS: IMPORTED POTTERY AS EVIDENCE FOR FOREIGN CONTACT L. Vance Watrous After nine years of excavation (1), it has become apparent that the site of Kommos on the south coast of Crete was not another Minoan palace centre. Rather, it is a major port site which fed the nearby urban centre at Phaistos. Consequently, the sequence of imports at the site assumes considerable historical interest. The geographical range and number of imported trade items at Kommos is, to my knowledge, unmatched at any Aegean site excavated since World War I. The purpose of this paper is to describe the imported Bronze Age vessels at Kommos, and to suggest some of the broader implications of these finds. For the present my remarks should be regarded as provisional. Kommos is located at a natural harbour site, about an hour's walk from the palatial settlement at Phaistos. Excavation at the site since 1976 has concentrated on three sectors: the settlement on the hilltop and on the hillside, and the monumental complex below to the south. The total number of foreign vessels found in Middle Minoan (MM) contexts at Kommos is, according to Professor P. Betancourt, no more than a dozen. There are two jug fragments, probably from Cyprus, from an MM IB context, a Cypriote White Painted IV juglet from an MM III level, and a Nippled Ewer from Thera or Melos, also from an MM III deposit. The number of imported vases from LM I contexts at Kommos is relatively small. An important exception to this situation is a Late Minoan (LM) IB deposit of vases which fell down into the southern staircase area of Building J in the lower complex.
    [Show full text]
  • A Deposit of Archaic and Classical Greek Pottery at Ayja Irini, Keos
    A DEPOSIT OF ARCHAIC AND CLASSICALGREEK POTTERY AT AYJA IRINI, KEOS (PLATES 65-70) / YIA IRINI, Keos, is primarily a Bronze Age site, but material of Greek date occurs sporadically in surface levels and has been found in quantity in two places. Pottery from the upper levels of the Bronze Age temple testifies to con- tinued religious activity there from the Protogeometric period to the 4th century B.C. or later.' The second concentration of post-Bronze Age pottery was found in the northeastern part of the site, outside the Bronze Age fortification walls in the area of the Northeast Bastion.2 The following account deals with the latter deposit, which I was invited to study in 1969.' North of Tower ne (Fig. 1) was a great fall of big blocks from the Bronze Age fortifications. The tops of the blocks were not far below the modern surface of the ground. Archaic and Classical pottery, with a few fragments of Geometric style, lay scattered in the space east, north and northwest of the tower. It was most heavily concentrated above and among the blocks and was found to a depth of ca. 0.50 m. in the spaces between them. Under some of the blocks, as was seen in one small test, the earth contained sherds of Late Helladic (LH) IIIA. In the angle of Walls I and K were the remains of a late Roman lime kiln (later removed in the course of the excavations), and some pottery presumably from the time of its use occurred in parts of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • From Small States to Universalism in the Pre-Islamic Near East
    REVOLUTIONIZING REVOLUTIONIZING Mark Altaweel and Andrea Squitieri and Andrea Mark Altaweel From Small States to Universalism in the Pre-Islamic Near East This book investigates the long-term continuity of large-scale states and empires, and its effect on the Near East’s social fabric, including the fundamental changes that occurred to major social institutions. Its geographical coverage spans, from east to west, modern- day Libya and Egypt to Central Asia, and from north to south, Anatolia to southern Arabia, incorporating modern-day Oman and Yemen. Its temporal coverage spans from the late eighth century BCE to the seventh century CE during the rise of Islam and collapse of the Sasanian Empire. The authors argue that the persistence of large states and empires starting in the eighth/ seventh centuries BCE, which continued for many centuries, led to new socio-political structures and institutions emerging in the Near East. The primary processes that enabled this emergence were large-scale and long-distance movements, or population migrations. These patterns of social developments are analysed under different aspects: settlement patterns, urban structure, material culture, trade, governance, language spread and religion, all pointing at population movement as the main catalyst for social change. This book’s argument Mark Altaweel is framed within a larger theoretical framework termed as ‘universalism’, a theory that explains WORLD A many of the social transformations that happened to societies in the Near East, starting from Andrea Squitieri the Neo-Assyrian period and continuing for centuries. Among other infl uences, the effects of these transformations are today manifested in modern languages, concepts of government, universal religions and monetized and globalized economies.
    [Show full text]
  • View the Catalogue
    197 ‘I will be gone from here and sing my songs In the forest wilderness where the wild beasts are’ 2 Eclogue X, Virgil Storage jar Near Eastern Tepe Giyan IV, Akkadian Period, c.2400-2200 BC Terracotta Height 21.2cm Large rounded wheel-made jar decorated with brown-black bands of solid colour, waves and zig-zags on the carinated shoulder and neck, the mouth with an out-splayed lip. Around the unpainted body run two pairs of raised ribs framing a wide band within which are two raised undulating lines. Two small chips on the body. Repair to lip. Provenance Professor Dr. Günther Marschall (1913-1997), Hamburg, Germany; acquired 1967-1975 Comparanda Two examples, seemingly from the same workshop, are in the Musée du Louvre; Salle 9, vitrine 1, accession numbers AO18654 and AO11988 4 Three cuneiform bricks Mesopotamian Nippur, reign of Ur Nammu, c.2112 BC and reign of Amar Sin, c.2046 BC Terracotta Dimensions 26.5x25cm, 29.5x24.5cm and 26.5x26.5cm The first and third bricks are stamped with cuneiform text which reads “(The divine) Amar-Su’en, was called by Enlil in Nippur, the supporter of the temple of Enlil. The mighty king of Ur, king of the four quarters of heaven and earth, for the god Enki, his beloved lord, he built his beloved Abzu”. The second brick is stamped with cuneiform text which reads “Ur-Nammu, the king of Ur, the king of Sumer and Akkad, (is) the one who built the temple of Enlil”. All three have traces of bitumen on the reverse and various breaks along the edges.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceramic Production and Exchange in the Late Mycenaean Saronic Gulf
    Ceramic Production and Exchange in the Late Mycenaean Saronic Gulf William D. Gilstrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Archaeology University of Sheffield February 2015 Abstract This thesis examines the production, exchange and consumption of pottery around the Saronic Gulf, Greece, during Late Mycenaean period, specifically Late Helladic IIIB1 to Late Helladic IIIC Phase 1, roughly 1300-1130 BC. While the focus of many studies of Mycenaean political economy has fallen on Messinia and the Argolid, the choice of the Saronic Gulf offers the chance to examine ceramic crafting, movement and use in an area which hosts no accepted ‘palatial’ centres. It aims to examine the role of pottery in everyday social and economic transaction, taking a ‘bottom-up’ approach to shedding light on Mycenaean society and economy. Pottery from a wide range of sites has been studied: urban centres such as Athens; harbours at Kanakia on Salamis and Kalamianos in coastal Corinthia; small settlements of Stiri in Corinthia, Myti Kommeni on Dokos and Lazarides on Aegina; sanctuary sites of Eleusis and Ayios Konstantinos, Methana; and finally the settlement and pottery production site of Kontopigado, Alimos near the Attic coast. Based on typological and macroscopic fabric studies, a large number of samples have been chosen for examination by an integrated programme of petrographic, chemical (by neutron activation analysis) and microstructural analysis (by scanning electron microscopy), in order to group and characterise to pottery according to composition, to reconstruct key aspects of ceramic manufacture and, where possible, to suggest the area or location of their production.
    [Show full text]