DOCSLIB.ORG

The Forts on Hadrian S Wall: a Comparative Analysis of the Form and Construction of Some Buildings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Forts on Hadrian S Wall: a Comparative Analysis of the Form and Construction of Some Buildings Durham E-Theses The forts on Hadrian s wall: a comparative analysis of the form and construction of some buildings Taylor, David J.A. How to cite: Taylor, David J.A. (1999) The forts on Hadrian s wall: a comparative analysis of the form and construction of some buildings, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4555/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 The forts on Hadrian's Wall: a comparative analysis of the form and construction of some buildings in three volumes David J. A. Taylor 19 JUL Volume 1 The copyright of this thesis rests witli tlie author. No quotation from it should be published widiout the written consent of the author and information derived from it should be acknowledged. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Archaeology, University of Durham, 1999 I confirm that no part of the material offered has previously been submitted by me for a degree in this or in any other University. If material has been generated through joint work, my independent contribution has been clearly indicated. In all other cases material from the work of others has been acknowledged and quotations and paraphrases suitably indicated. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his written consent, and information derived from it should be acknowledged. Abstract The thesis undertakes a comparative analysis of some of the stone buildings within the forts of the completed concept of Hadrian's Wall. The buildings included are the principia, granaries, gates and barracks. Each building type has been measured and inspected on site, or the data obtained from archival or documentary sources. As a background to the study the forts are set in the context of the Wall, examining its structure, garrisons and taking an overview of the archaeological record, additionally general Roman building techniques are reviewed . The selected buildings within each fort are then discussed and compared with other buildings on the Wall, or on other military sites. In this way their form, dimensional analysis, construction sequence and building techniques are considered and discussed. Common features and major differences are highlighted in the forts and the buildings, and comparisons drawn. Some tentative Unks are made as to the builders of the forts and the probable use of standard units of measure. Reconstructions of the buildings are put forward, taking into account the archaeological evidence and architectural considerations. Supporting information supplied in the appendices includes data relating to each fort as well as schedules of dimensions of the buildings, together with comparative tables. A catalogue of the decorated and moulded stonework sets out and discusses the stonework from the various buildings. m CONTENTS Volume 1 Abstract iii Contents iv Preface xix 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Objectives 1 1.2 Previous Research 2 1.3 An Overview of the Wall and its Garrisons 13 1.4 The Sites 24 1.5 The recording of Dimensional Data 33 1.6 Summary 36 Notes 38 2.0 The Techniques of Roman Building Construction 41 2.1 Masonry 42 2.2 Mortar and Render 51 2.3 Carpentry 57 2.4 Roof Coverings 66 2.5 Structural Integrity 75 2.6 Summary 83 Notes 84 IV 3.0 The Buildings 87 3.1 Design and Form 87 3.1.1 ThePrincipia 87 3.1.2 TheForehall 94 3.1.3 The Basilica Building at Birdoswald 98 3.1.4 The Granaries 98 3.1.5 The Gates 105 3.1.6 The Barracks 108 Notes 115 3.2 Dimensional Analysis 116 3.2.1 The Forts 116 3.2.2 ThtPrincipia 117 3.2.3 TheForehall 125 3.2.4 The Basilica Building at Birdoswald 126 3.2.5 The Granaries 126 3.2.6 The Gates 129 3.2.7 The Barracks 133 3.2.8 Metrology and Design 135 Notes 141 3.3 Construction Sequence 142 3.3.1 The Constructional Sequence of the Forts 142 3.3.2 The Constructional Sequence of the Buildings 157 Notes 164 3.4 Constructional Techniques 166 3.4.1 The Principia 166 3.4.1.1 Foundations, Masonry and Openings 166 3.4.1.2 The Roof 186 3.4.1.3 Floors and Wall Finishes 189 Notes 193 3.4.2 The Granaries 195 3.4.2.1 Foundations, Masonry and Openings 195 3.4.2.2 The Floors 201 3.4.2.3 The Roofs 208 3.4.2.4 Buttresses 210 3.4.2.5 Wall Finishes 212 Notes 213 3.4.3 The Gates 215 3.4.3.1 Foundations, Masonry and Openings 215 3.4.3.2 Gates and Pivots 228 3.4.3.3 The Roofs 233 3.4.3.4 Wall Finishes 233 Notes 235 3.4.4 The Barracks 236 3.4.4.1 Foundations, Masonry and Openings 236 3.4.4.2 The Roof 239 3.4.4.3 Floors and Wall Finishes 242 Notes 243 VI 3.4.5 Conclusion 244 3.4.5.1 Design and Form 244 3.4.5.2 Constructional Methodology 249 3.4.5.3 Decorated and Moulded Stonework 254 3.4.5.4 Summary 256 Notes 258 4.0 Reconstruction of the Buildings 259 4.1 The Principia 259 4.2 The Granaries 263 4.3 The Gates 268 4.4 The Barracks 277 Notes 279 5.0 Summary and Recommendation 280 Notes 286 6.0 Glossary of Terms 287 7.0 Bibliography and abbreviations 292 vu Volume 2 The Appendices Appendix 1 Data sheets for the primary forts 1 Notes to appendices 1 and 2 2 Schedule of primary forts per lineam valli and to the west coast 3 WaUsend 4 Newcastle upon Tyne 25 Benwell 30 Rudchester 39 Halton Chesters 48 Chesters 62 Carrawburgh 80 Housesteads 87 Great Chesters 105 Carvoran 112 Birdoswald 116 Castlesteads 133 Stanwix 136 Burgh-by-Sands 141 Drumburgh 145 Bowness-on-Solway 149 Beckfoot 157 Maryport 160 Moresby 165 VIU Appendix 2 Data sheets for the secondary forts 168 Schedule of secondary forts 169 Birrens 170 Netherby 174 Bewcastle 177 South Shields 183 Chesterholm 209 Old Church, Brampton 220 Appendix 3 Tables setting out tabulated dimensions of the buildings and their selected parts 227 Table 1 Dimensions and area of the forts 228 Table 2 The principia, comparative overall sizes 230 Table 3 The principia, comparative dimensions 231 Table 4 The principia, comparative dimensions 232 Table 5 The granaries, comparative overall sizes 233 Table 6 The granaries, comparative sizes of buttresses 234 Table 7 The granaries, method of support to floors 235 Table 8 The gates, comparative overall sizes 236 Table 9 The gates, comparative dimensions 238 Table 10 The gates, comparative dimensions 240 Table 11 The barracks, comparative overall sizes 242 Table 12 The barracks, comparative dimensions 244 Table 13 The barracks, comparative dimensions 246 ix Appendix 4 Catalogue of decorated and moulded stonework 248 A Colunm capitals 249 B Column bases 251 ^ C Columns 253 D Cornice mouldings 254 E String courses 255 F Gate imposts 258 G Base moulds and thresholds 259 H Merlon caps 261 J Arcuate lintols 262 Notes 265 Appendix 5 Structural calculations 266 Notes to appendix 5 267 A The basilica, Birdoswald B The south granary, Birdoswald Volume 3 List of Figures and Plates Figures 1 Fig. 1 Location plan of Hadrian's Wall 2 2 Plan of the Roman Fort at: Wallsend 3 3 Newcastle upon Tyne 4 4 Benwell 5 5 Rudchester 6 6 Halton Chesters 7 7 Halton Chesters - Magnetometry Interpretation 8 8 Chesters 9 9 Carrawburgh 10 10 Housesteads 11 11 Great Chesters 12 12 Carvoran 13 13 Birdoswald 14 14 Birdoswald - Magnetometry Interpretation 15 15 Castlesteads 16 16 Stanwix 17 17 Burgh-by-Sands 18 XI 18 Drumburgh 19 19 Bowness-on-Solway 20 20 Beckfoot 21 21 Maryport 22 22 Moresby 23 23 Birrens 24 24 Netherby 25 25 Bewcastle 26 26 South Shields 27 27 Chesterholm 28 28 Old Church, Brampton 29 29 Plan of the/7n>2C7/7/<3r, Chesters 30 30 Plan of the principia, Housesteads 31 31 Diagramaric floor plan showing position of tabulated dimensions, principia and gates 32 32 Diagramatic floor plan showing position of tabulated dunensions, granaries and barracks 33 33 Section through a log showing a halved timber 34 34 Section through slated roof covering showing lap 35 35 Reconstruction of/?n>zcz/?/a, Chesters 36 36 Roof forms: couple, close couple, and rafter roofs 37 37 Purlin roof and truss 38 38 Reconstruction of northern ambulatory and entrance into courtyard, Wallsend 39 XU 39 Reconstruction of the basilica, Birdoswald 40 40 Reconstruction of the basilica, Birdoswald; section and part elevation of arcade 41 41 Reconstruction of granary (A5, mid-Antonine), South Shields 42 42 Section through a Severan granary at South Shields, showing introduction of a first floor with access above the loading bay 43 43 Part plan and elevation of reconstructed barrack block 44 44 Part elevation and section of reconstructed barrack block 45 45 Section through typical barrack block showing alternative roof forms 46 46 Arrangement of double cantilevered scaffolding 47 47 Plan of Hadrianic principia, Chesterholm 48 48 Pier to east of aedes showing chamfered plinth course and upper chamfered course, principia, Chesters 49 49 Reconstruction of opening to aedes, principia, Chesters 50 50 Reconstruction of floor to granary, Housesteads 51 51 Reconstruction of a gate, Wallsend 52 52 Front elevation and section through granary, Halton Chesters 53 53 Reconstruction of a gate with two storey towers, Birdoswald 54 54 Reconstruction of a gate with three storey towers and a storey over the portals, Wallsend 55 55 Diagram showing layout of joists at first floor level to east gate, Birdoswald 56 56 Section through a typical barrack block, Wallsend 57 xm 57 Sandstone capital and two colunm bases of differing style, principia, Wallsend 58 58 Capital to the arcade to the granary, Housesteads 59 59 A Cornice mould, principia, Housesteads 60 B Cornice mould, principia, Housesteads 60 60 A Moulded sill to probable tribunal, principia.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Map for Day out One Hadrian's Wall Classic
    Welcome to Hadian’s Wall Country a UNESCO Arriva & Stagecoach KEY Map for Day Out One World Heritage Site. Truly immerse yourself in Newcastle - Hexham - Carlisle www.arrivabus.co.uk/north-east A Runs Daily the history and heritage of the area by exploring 685 Hadrian’s Wall Classic Tickets and Passes National Trail (See overleaf) by bus and on foot. Plus, spending just one day Arriva Cuddy’s Crags Newcastle - Corbridge - Hexham www.arrivabus.co.uk/north-east Alternative - Roman Traveller’s Guide without your car can help to look after this area of X85 Runs Monday - Friday Military Way (Nov-Mar) national heritage. Hotbank Crags 3 AD122 Rover Tickets The Sill Walk In this guide to estbound These tickets offer This traveller’s guide is designed to help you leave Milecastle 37 Housesteads eet W unlimited travel on Parking est End een Hadrian’s Wall uns r the AD122 service. Roman Fort the confines of your car behind and truly “walk G ee T ont Str ough , Hexham Road Approx Refreshments in the footsteps of the Romans”. So, find your , Lion and Lamb journey times Crag Lough independent spirit and let the journey become part ockley don Mill, Bowes Hotel eenhead, Bypass arwick Bridge Eldon SquaLemingtonre Thr Road EndsHeddon, ThHorsler y Ovington Corbridge,Road EndHexham Angel InnHaydon Bridge,Bar W Melkridge,Haltwhistle, The Gr MarketBrampton, Place W Fr Scotby Carlisle Adult Child Concession Family Roman Site Milecastle 38 Country Both 685 and X85 of your adventure. hr Sycamore 685 only 1 Day Ticket £12.50 £6.50 £9.50 £26.00 Haydon t 16 23 27
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Britain
    Roman Britain Hadrian s Wall - History Vallum Hadriani - Historia “ Having completely transformed the soldiers, in royal fashion, he made for Britain, where he set right many things and - the rst to do so - drew a wall along a length of eighty miles to separate barbarians and Romans. (The Augustan History, Hadrian 11.1)” Although we have much epigraphic evidence from the Wall itself, the sole classical literary reference for Hadrian having built the Wall is the passage above, wrien by Aelius Spartianus towards the end of the 3rd century AD. The original concept of a continuous barrier across the Tyne-Solway isthmus, was devised by emperor Hadrian during his visit to Britain in 122AD. His visit had been prompted by the threat of renewed unrest with the Brigantes tribe of northern Britain, and the need was seen to separate this war-like race from the lowland tribes of Scotland, with whom they had allied against Rome during recent troubles. Components of The Wall Hadrian s Wall was a composite military barrier which, in its nal form, comprised six separate elements; 1. A stone wall fronted by a V-shaped ditch. 2. A number of purpose-built stone garrison forti cations; Forts, Milecastles and Turrets. 3. A large earthwork and ditch, built parallel with and to the south of the Wall, known as the Vallum. 4. A metalled road linking the garrison forts, the Roman Military Way . 5. A number of outpost forts built to the north of the Wall and linked to it by road. 6. A series of forts and lookout towers along the Cumbrian coast, the Western Sea Defences .
    [Show full text]
  • The Antonine Wall, the Roman Frontier in Scotland, Was the Most and Northerly Frontier of the Roman Empire for a Generation from AD 142
    Breeze The Antonine Wall, the Roman frontier in Scotland, was the most and northerly frontier of the Roman Empire for a generation from AD 142. Hanson It is a World Heritage Site and Scotland’s largest ancient monument. The Antonine Wall Today, it cuts across the densely populated central belt between Forth (eds) and Clyde. In The Antonine Wall: Papers in Honour of Professor Lawrence Keppie, Papers in honour of nearly 40 archaeologists, historians and heritage managers present their researches on the Antonine Wall in recognition of the work Professor Lawrence Keppie of Lawrence Keppie, formerly Professor of Roman History and Wall Antonine The Archaeology at the Hunterian Museum, Glasgow University, who spent edited by much of his academic career recording and studying the Wall. The 32 papers cover a wide variety of aspects, embracing the environmental and prehistoric background to the Wall, its structure, planning and David J. Breeze and William S. Hanson construction, military deployment on its line, associated artefacts and inscriptions, the logistics of its supply, as well as new insights into the study of its history. Due attention is paid to the people of the Wall, not just the ofcers and soldiers, but their womenfolk and children. Important aspects of the book are new developments in the recording, interpretation and presentation of the Antonine Wall to today’s visitors. Considerable use is also made of modern scientifc techniques, from pollen, soil and spectrographic analysis to geophysical survey and airborne laser scanning. In short, the papers embody present- day cutting edge research on, and summarise the most up-to-date understanding of, Rome’s shortest-lived frontier.
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantine Missionaries, Foreign Rulers, and Christian Narratives (Ca
    Conversion and Empire: Byzantine Missionaries, Foreign Rulers, and Christian Narratives (ca. 300-900) by Alexander Borislavov Angelov A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in The University of Michigan 2011 Doctoral Committee: Professor John V.A. Fine, Jr., Chair Professor Emeritus H. Don Cameron Professor Paul Christopher Johnson Professor Raymond H. Van Dam Associate Professor Diane Owen Hughes © Alexander Borislavov Angelov 2011 To my mother Irina with all my love and gratitude ii Acknowledgements To put in words deepest feelings of gratitude to so many people and for so many things is to reflect on various encounters and influences. In a sense, it is to sketch out a singular narrative but of many personal “conversions.” So now, being here, I am looking back, and it all seems so clear and obvious. But, it is the historian in me that realizes best the numerous situations, emotions, and dilemmas that brought me where I am. I feel so profoundly thankful for a journey that even I, obsessed with planning, could not have fully anticipated. In a final analysis, as my dissertation grew so did I, but neither could have become better without the presence of the people or the institutions that I feel so fortunate to be able to acknowledge here. At the University of Michigan, I first thank my mentor John Fine for his tremendous academic support over the years, for his friendship always present when most needed, and for best illustrating to me how true knowledge does in fact produce better humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • ROMANO- BRITISH Villa A
    Prehistoric (Stone Age to Iron Age) Corn-Dryer Although the Roman villa had a great impact on the banks The excavated heated room, or of the River Tees, archaeologists found that there had been caldarium (left). activity in the area for thousands of years prior to the Quarry The caldarium was the bath Roman arrival. Seven pots and a bronze punch, or chisel, tell house. Although this building us that people were living and working here at least 4000 was small, it was well built. It years ago. was probably constructed Farm during the early phases of the villa complex. Ingleby Roman For Romans, bath houses were social places where people The Romano-British villa at Quarry Farm has been preserved in could meet. Barwick an area of open space, in the heart of the new Ingleby Barwick housing development. Excavations took place in 2003-04, carried out by Archaeological Services Durham University Outbuildings (ASDU), to record the villa area. This included structures, such as the heated room (shown above right), aisled building (shown below right), and eld enclosures. Caldarium Anglo-Saxon (Heated Room) Winged With the collapse of the Roman Empire, Roman inuence Preserved Area Corridor began to slowly disappear from Britain, but activity at the Structure Villa Complex villa site continued. A substantial amount of pottery has been discovered, as have re-pits which may have been used for cooking, and two possible sunken oored buildings, indicating that people still lived and worked here. Field Enclosures Medieval – Post Medieval Aisled Building Drove Way A scatter of medieval pottery, ridge and furrow earthworks (Villa boundary) Circular Building and early eld boundaries are all that could be found relating to medieval settlement and agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Ii. Sites in Britain
    II. SITES IN BRITAIN Adel, 147 Brough-by-Bainbridge, 32 Alcester, cat. #459 Brough-on-Noe (Navia), cat. #246, Aldborough, 20 n.36 317, 540 Antonine Wall, 20 n.36, 21, 71, 160, 161 Brough-under-Stainmore, 195 Auchendavy, I 61, cat. #46, 225, 283, Burgh-by-Sands (Aballava), 100 n.4, 301, 370 118, 164 n.32, cat. #215, 216, 315, 565-568 Backworth, 61 n.252, 148 Burgh Castle, 164 n.32 Bakewell, cat. #605 Balmuildy, cat. #85, 284 Cadder, cat. #371 Bar Hill, cat. #296, 369, 467 Caerhun, 42 Barkway, 36, 165, cat. #372, 473, 603 Caerleon (lsca), 20 n.36, 30, 31, 51 Bath (Aquae Sulis), 20, 50, 54 n.210, n.199, 61 n.253, 67, 68, 86, 123, 99, 142, 143, 147, 149, 150, 151, 128, 129, 164 n.34, 166 n.40, 192, 157 n.81, 161, 166-171, 188, 192, 196, cat. #24, 60, 61, 93, 113, I 14, 201, 206, 213, cat. #38, 106, 470, 297, 319, 327, 393, 417 526-533 Caernarvon (Segontium), 42 n.15 7, Benwell (Condercum), 20 n.36, 39, 78, 87-88, 96 n.175, 180, 205, 42 n.157, 61, 101, 111-112, 113, cat. #229 121, 107 n.41, 153, 166 n.40, 206, Caerwent (Venta Silurum), 143, 154, cat. #36, 102, 237, 266, 267, 318, 198 n. 72, cat. #469, 61 7 404, 536, 537, 644, 645 Canterbury, 181, 198 n.72 Bertha, cat. #5 7 Cappuck, cat. #221 Bewcastle (Fan um Cocidi), 39, 61, I 08, Carley Hill Quarry, 162 111 n.48, 112, 117, 121, 162, 206, Carlisle (Luguvalium), 43, 46, 96, 112, cat.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Past the Following List Contains Details of Archaeological
    Assessing the Past The following list contains details of archaeological assessments, evaluations and other work carried out in Northumberland in 2013-2015. They mostly result from requests made by the County Archaeologist for further research to be carried out ahead of planning applications being determined. Copies of these reports are available for consultation from the Archaeology Section at County Hall and some are available to download from the Library of ​ Unpublished Fieldwork held by the Archaeology Data Service. Event Site Name Activity Organisation Commissioned by Start Parish No 15115 East House Farm, Guyzance, DESK BASED Wessex Archaeology Knight Frank LLP 2013 ACKLINGTON Northumberland: Archaeological Impact ASSESSMENT Assessment 15540 Lanton Quarry Phase 6 archaeological STRIP MAP AND Archaeological Lafarge Tarmac Ltd 2013 AKELD excavation SAMPLE Research Services 15340 Highburn House, Wooler WATCHING BRIEF Archaeological Services Sustainable Energy 2013 AKELD Durham University Systems Ltd 15740 Archaeological assessment of Allenheads DESK BASED Vindomora Solutions The North Pennines 2013 ALLENDALE Lead Ore Works and associated structures, ASSESSMENT AONB Partnership as Craigshield Powder House, Allendale part of the HLF funded Allen Valleys Partnership Project 15177 The Dale Hotel, Market Place, Allendale, EVALUATION Wardell Armstrong Countryside Consultants 2013 ALLENDALE Northumberland: archaeological evaluation 15166 An Archaeological Evaluation at Haggerston TRIAL TRENCH Pre-Construct Prospect Archaeology 2013 ANCROFT
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476)
    Impact of Empire 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd i 5-4-2007 8:35:52 Impact of Empire Editorial Board of the series Impact of Empire (= Management Team of the Network Impact of Empire) Lukas de Blois, Angelos Chaniotis Ségolène Demougin, Olivier Hekster, Gerda de Kleijn Luuk de Ligt, Elio Lo Cascio, Michael Peachin John Rich, and Christian Witschel Executive Secretariat of the Series and the Network Lukas de Blois, Olivier Hekster Gerda de Kleijn and John Rich Radboud University of Nijmegen, Erasmusplein 1, P.O. Box 9103, 6500 HD Nijmegen, The Netherlands E-mail addresses: [email protected] and [email protected] Academic Board of the International Network Impact of Empire geza alföldy – stéphane benoist – anthony birley christer bruun – john drinkwater – werner eck – peter funke andrea giardina – johannes hahn – fik meijer – onno van nijf marie-thérèse raepsaet-charlier – john richardson bert van der spek – richard talbert – willem zwalve VOLUME 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd ii 5-4-2007 8:35:52 The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476) Economic, Social, Political, Religious and Cultural Aspects Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Roman Empire, 200 B.C. – A.D. 476) Capri, March 29 – April 2, 2005 Edited by Lukas de Blois & Elio Lo Cascio With the Aid of Olivier Hekster & Gerda de Kleijn LEIDEN • BOSTON 2007 This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cambridge Companion to Age of Constantine.Pdf
    The Cambridge Companion to THE AGE OF CONSTANTINE S The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine offers students a com- prehensive one-volume introduction to this pivotal emperor and his times. Richly illustrated and designed as a readable survey accessible to all audiences, it also achieves a level of scholarly sophistication and a freshness of interpretation that will be welcomed by the experts. The volume is divided into five sections that examine political history, reli- gion, social and economic history, art, and foreign relations during the reign of Constantine, a ruler who gains in importance because he steered the Roman Empire on a course parallel with his own personal develop- ment. Each chapter examines the intimate interplay between emperor and empire and between a powerful personality and his world. Collec- tively, the chapters show how both were mutually affected in ways that shaped the world of late antiquity and even affect our own world today. Noel Lenski is Associate Professor of Classics at the University of Colorado, Boulder. A specialist in the history of late antiquity, he is the author of numerous articles on military, political, cultural, and social history and the monograph Failure of Empire: Valens and the Roman State in the Fourth Century ad. Cambridge Collections Online © Cambridge University Press, 2007 Cambridge Collections Online © Cambridge University Press, 2007 The Cambridge Companion to THE AGE OF CONSTANTINE S Edited by Noel Lenski University of Colorado Cambridge Collections Online © Cambridge University Press, 2007 cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao˜ Paulo Cambridge University Press 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, usa www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521818384 c Cambridge University Press 2006 This publication is in copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Errington Arms Inn, Stagshaw Corbridge Northumberland
    ERRINGTON ARMS INN, STAGSHAW CORBRIDGE NORTHUMBERLAND Archaeological Watching Brief Oxford Archaeology North November 2006 Countryside Agency Issue No: 2006-7/574 OA North Job No: L9462 NGR: NY 9874 6863 Planning Application No: 20050160 Document Title: ERRINGTON ARMS INN, STAGSHAW, CORBRIDGE, NORTHUMBERLAND Document Type: Archaeological Watching Brief Client Name: Countryside Agency Issue Number: 2006-7/574 OA North Job Number: L9462 National Grid Reference: NY 9874 6863 Prepared by: David Tonks Position: Assistant Supervisor Date: November 2006 Checked by: Emily Mercer Signed……………………. Position: Senior Project Manager Date: November 2006 Approved by: Alan Lupton Signed……………………. Position: Operations Manager Date: November 2006 Document File Location Emily/Projects/H Walls Boards/Report/Errington WB Rep.doc Oxford Archaeology North © Oxford Archaeological Unit Ltd (2006) Storey Institute Janus House Meeting House Lane Osney Mead Lancaster Oxford LA1 1TF OX2 0EA t: (0044) 01524 848666 t: (0044) 01865 263800 f: (0044) 01524 848606 f: (0044) 01865 793496 w: www.oxfordarch.co.uk e: [email protected] Oxford Archaeological Unit Limited is a Registered Charity No: 285627 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Oxford Archaeology being obtained. Oxford Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequences of this document being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person/party using or relying on the document for such other purposes agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm their agreement to indemnify Oxford Archaeology for all loss or damage resulting therefrom.
    [Show full text]
  • English/French
    World Heritage 36 COM WHC-12/36.COM/8D Paris, 1 June 2012 Original: English/French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Thirty-sixth Session Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation 24 June – 6 July 2012 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8D: Clarifications of property boundaries and areas by States Parties in response to the Retrospective Inventory SUMMARY This document refers to the results of the Retrospective Inventory of nomination files of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List in the period 1978 - 1998. To date, seventy States Parties have responded to the letters sent following the review of the individual files, in order to clarify the original intention of their nominations (or to submit appropriate cartographic documentation) for two hundred fifty-three World Heritage properties. This document presents fifty-five boundary clarifications received from twenty-five States Parties, as an answer to the Retrospective Inventory. Draft Decision: 36 COM 8D, see Point IV I. The Retrospective Inventory 1. The Retrospective Inventory, an in-depth examination of the Nomination dossiers available at the World Heritage Centre, ICOMOS and IUCN, was initiated in 2004, in parallel with the launching of the Periodic Reporting exercise in Europe, involving European properties inscribed on the World Heritage List in the period 1978 - 1998. The same year, the Retrospective Inventory was endorsed by the World Heritage Committee at its 7th extraordinary session (UNESCO, 2004; see Decision 7 EXT.COM 7.1).
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]