DOCSLIB.ORG

Durham E-Theses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Durham E-Theses Durham E-Theses The vallum reconsidered. Swinbank, Brenda How to cite: Swinbank, Brenda (1954) The vallum reconsidered., Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/6395/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk THE VALLUM RECQNSIDEEED. BY BPvENDA SWIMBAMo A TtlESIS PRESENTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, MY 1954 0 VOLmffi I: TEXT, The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. PREFACE. The present thesis embodies the results of three years' active research per lineam valli. from 1949 to 1952. The project originated in a dissertation presented for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in 194S suffimrlsing the problem of the Vallum to tiiat date. This served to deiLonstrate that althoi;^ theories of varying degrees of probability were constantly being postulated, few of these had been put to the test by the spade0 It tabulated a prograMne of research on this and other aspects of the Vallum, some of which had been neglected since 1922o ViOien the writer was awarded a Research Studentship in order to carry out this progranime on the very day on which the Centenary Pilgrimage of Hadrian's fall- 1949 began, circumstances were indeed propitiouso The work received a tremendous impetus from the Pilgrimage of 1949 when interest centred partly on the new "servi.ce-road hypothesis" of Eric •Birley and its implicationso It was with this as a working hypothesis that the writer began her research in 1949. The project h^as necessitated a considerable anount of excavation which ej^serience proves to be at once arduous and slow yet exciting and exasperating. Before the writer could undertake such work alone, the processes entailed in excavation had to be learned. It is in this respect that the writer owes a deep debt of gratitude to Professor I,A.Richmond, Eric Birley, John P. Qillsiii and the Corbridge Summer Training School for their excellent tuition and unfailing guidance. Without this training her research project could not have been undertaken. The Vallim has been reconsidered in many aspects and much new material 'has come to light. But this thesis is not intended to be; exhaustive, and demonstrates what points have still to be solved. The writer has accepted the existence of of the Vallum without atteiipjing to ans-ffer the question of why a Vallum exists in Britain and on no other Roman frontier, for this is a problem far too wide for a thesis of the present scope. Nor does the writer discuss the prehistoric background of the Vallum,' a subject probably intimately connected with the above problem. Little is known of the character and activities of the great Iron Age tribe of the Pennines, the Brigantes, especially in the Wall area. If the results of Dr. Rai St rick's research on the limestone uplands of Craven are chi^racteristic of the rest of Brigatitian territory, here is a people more populous than has hitherto been realised, stubborn in their passionate desire to preserve their independence eind cling on to their own traditions and habits of life. Three .times vathin a century did the Brigantes assert their independence, firstly under the patriot Venutius until his defeat in yif A.D. by Cerialis at Stanwick; again in A.D. 115;when the northern tribes revolted and caused serious havoc among the Romans in the Pennines; finally in A.D. 155 when the Brigantes were able to join with the tribes of south-west Scotland in a simultaneous revolt, such as the constmuction of Hadrian's Wall and Vallum had anticipated and was intended to prevent, tother, no attempt has been made by the writer to discuss the economic implications of the Wall frontier. In the light of the amazing discoveries of Colonel Baradez on the Fossatum Afrlcae. where the frontier line marks the boundary between the uncultivated barbarian territory and the cultivated Roman province, it has become desirable to review the purpose not only of Hadrian's Wall but of Roman frontiers generally, which have largely been regarded from the military, political and psychological points of view. The Vallum may then have economic as well as political significance. With these limitations, the reconsideration of the Vallum is complete. The writer wishes to express her sincerest thanks to the many individuals and bodies who have made this thesis possible; firstly, to the Durham Colleges Research Board, without whose sanction and scholarship her work could not have proceeded; to the Yorkshire Society, for their generous financial assistance enabling her research to continue for a third year; to h^r parents, without whose constant encouragement and support her years of research would have been impossible; to her typists, Ivlisses J. Pettifer, B.A. and P. Wardle, B.A;. to Robert Sutton for his assistance in the duplication of the illustrations; to Ian Kemp, for his aid on the photographic side; to the landowners and tenajits, for their kind permission to excavate and friendly interest; to the Durham Oliver si ty Excavation Committee for sponsoring the excavations; to Thomas Batey for his excellent skill and work o| digging; to Charles Anderson of H.M.Ministry of Works, for his invaluable material assistance; to John P. Gillam M.A. for his constant interest, tuition, and invaluable discussion of the Vallum problems; to Professor I.A.Richmond for his training in the technique of excavation, his helpful criticism and support; above all, to her tutor, Eric Birley M.A.,F.S.A., without whose inspiration the writer may never h8.ve discovered the fascination of archaeology, an^d to whose unfailing encouragement and advice this thesis is largely due. CONTENTS. PREFACE... C Contents.. ....FRONTISPIECE Hadriaj^ic inscription from Horsley. PART I. Introduj3tion: An Plistorical Retrospect. I.'. PART II. The Vallum. A. The Coiii^osition of the Earthwork. 2.1 B. Per lineam valli. 3 C. The Vallum at River Crossings. I n. PAJ<T III. The Vallum and the Wall. A. i. The Vallum and the Wall Fbrts. lii^. ii. Great Chesters. 153. iii. Carvoran. (72.. iv. The Wall Sequence and its Dating. I &8. B. The Vallum at Milecastles. i. In the Turf Wall Sector. ii. In the Stone Wall Sector: milecastle 30. 2oZ. iii. Stanley PlStntation, milecastle 23. Z.Q(Q. iv. General note on the Vallum at milecastles. IZO. C. The course of the Vallum and Wall in general. 2.ZI. PART IV. The Purpose of the Vallum. A. The Problem of the Purpose of the Vallum. IZS. B. Recent Statements concerning the purpose of the 2./f3. Vallum. i. Professor Richmond. ii. E.Birley and the Service-road Hypothesis. 2.^^. iii. MI. John fetorris: "The Vallum Again." 2.Gt. PART V. Later Histoiy of the Vallum. A. Fornatlon of the Crossings. 2.70. B. i. The i/Iarginal Mound Problem. ZKo. ii. The Military Way. 301^.. iii. The Marcan Occupation of the Wall. 301. C. The Disuse of the Vallum at Forts. i. Birdos?ifald. ^iZ. ii. Benwell. Bllf- iii. Hbusesteads. 330. iv. Great ahesters, 331. V. General Conclusions. 331. D. The Disuse of the Vallum at Milecastles. i. In the Turf Wall Sector. 331+. ii. In the Stone Wall Sector. il^-l. iii. Secondary Milecastle Causeways. PART VI. Conclusions. 352.. HADR LECr Am T OMQl frontispiece, "TCRSLEY: Britannia Romana, PART 1. IMTRODUGTION; AN HISTORICAL RETROSPECT "ergo conversis regio more militibus Britanniam petiit, in qua multa correxit, murumque per octaginta milia passuum primus duxit, qui barbaros Romanosque divideret." , Spartianus: Vita Hadriani, 10-11. "Britanniam, quod maximum eius imperii decus est, muro per trans^ersam insulam dueto utrimque ad finem Oceani munivit, unde etiam Britannici nomen accepit." Spartianus: Vita Severi, l8, 2- "post murum apud vallum missum in Britannia". ibid. 22. •'per legatos suos plurima bella gessit. nam et Britan- nos per Lolli'om Urbicum vie it legatum alio muro caespiticio summotis barbaris ducto ... " Gapitolinusi*' Vita Antonini, 5> 4-. "Britanniam, quae ad ea utilis erat, pulsis hostibus muro munivit per transversam insulam ducto utrimque ad finem oceani ..." 3 Aurelius Victor: De Viris Illustribus, 20. "Severus in Britannia vallum per XXXII P.M. a mari ad mare deduxit." ibid.: Epitome, 20. "novissimum bellum in Britannia habuit; utque receptas provincias omni securitati muniret, vallum per XXXII M-P. a mari ad mare deduxit." (Severus) Eutropius: Historiae Romanae, viii,19. "ubi magnis gravibusque proeliis saepe gestis receptam partem insulae a ceteris iiidomitis gentibus vallo distin- guendam putavit. itaque magnam fossam firmissimumque vallum crebris insuper turribus eommunitum, per centum triginta et duo milia passuum a mari ad mare duxit." (Severus) Orosius: Historia, 17- "Severus in Britannos bellum transfert, ubi ut receptas proYincias ab incursione barbarica faceret securioi^es vallum per CXXXII P.M. a mari ad mare duxit." ^ Eusebius-Jerome: Chronicle- -1- -2- Such are the vague, conflicting testimonies and claims which have caused centuries of argument and confusion in the antiquarian world - have snatched the sleepy ruins of earth• work, wall and dyke from their tangled earthy oblivion - and have created the problem of that misnamed victim of controversy, theory, doctrine - the Vallum.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Roman Britain
    Roman Britain Hadrian s Wall - History Vallum Hadriani - Historia “ Having completely transformed the soldiers, in royal fashion, he made for Britain, where he set right many things and - the rst to do so - drew a wall along a length of eighty miles to separate barbarians and Romans. (The Augustan History, Hadrian 11.1)” Although we have much epigraphic evidence from the Wall itself, the sole classical literary reference for Hadrian having built the Wall is the passage above, wrien by Aelius Spartianus towards the end of the 3rd century AD. The original concept of a continuous barrier across the Tyne-Solway isthmus, was devised by emperor Hadrian during his visit to Britain in 122AD. His visit had been prompted by the threat of renewed unrest with the Brigantes tribe of northern Britain, and the need was seen to separate this war-like race from the lowland tribes of Scotland, with whom they had allied against Rome during recent troubles. Components of The Wall Hadrian s Wall was a composite military barrier which, in its nal form, comprised six separate elements; 1. A stone wall fronted by a V-shaped ditch. 2. A number of purpose-built stone garrison forti cations; Forts, Milecastles and Turrets. 3. A large earthwork and ditch, built parallel with and to the south of the Wall, known as the Vallum. 4. A metalled road linking the garrison forts, the Roman Military Way . 5. A number of outpost forts built to the north of the Wall and linked to it by road. 6. A series of forts and lookout towers along the Cumbrian coast, the Western Sea Defences .
    [Show full text]
  • Hadrian and the Greek East
    HADRIAN AND THE GREEK EAST: IMPERIAL POLICY AND COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Demetrios Kritsotakis, B.A, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Fritz Graf, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins ____________________________ Professor Anthony Kaldellis Adviser Greek and Latin Graduate Program Copyright by Demetrios Kritsotakis 2008 ABSTRACT The Roman Emperor Hadrian pursued a policy of unification of the vast Empire. After his accession, he abandoned the expansionist policy of his predecessor Trajan and focused on securing the frontiers of the empire and on maintaining its stability. Of the utmost importance was the further integration and participation in his program of the peoples of the Greek East, especially of the Greek mainland and Asia Minor. Hadrian now invited them to become active members of the empire. By his lengthy travels and benefactions to the people of the region and by the creation of the Panhellenion, Hadrian attempted to create a second center of the Empire. Rome, in the West, was the first center; now a second one, in the East, would draw together the Greek people on both sides of the Aegean Sea. Thus he could accelerate the unification of the empire by focusing on its two most important elements, Romans and Greeks. Hadrian channeled his intentions in a number of ways, including the use of specific iconographical types on the coinage of his reign and religious language and themes in his interactions with the Greeks. In both cases it becomes evident that the Greeks not only understood his messages, but they also reacted in a positive way.
    [Show full text]
  • Ii. Sites in Britain
    II. SITES IN BRITAIN Adel, 147 Brough-by-Bainbridge, 32 Alcester, cat. #459 Brough-on-Noe (Navia), cat. #246, Aldborough, 20 n.36 317, 540 Antonine Wall, 20 n.36, 21, 71, 160, 161 Brough-under-Stainmore, 195 Auchendavy, I 61, cat. #46, 225, 283, Burgh-by-Sands (Aballava), 100 n.4, 301, 370 118, 164 n.32, cat. #215, 216, 315, 565-568 Backworth, 61 n.252, 148 Burgh Castle, 164 n.32 Bakewell, cat. #605 Balmuildy, cat. #85, 284 Cadder, cat. #371 Bar Hill, cat. #296, 369, 467 Caerhun, 42 Barkway, 36, 165, cat. #372, 473, 603 Caerleon (lsca), 20 n.36, 30, 31, 51 Bath (Aquae Sulis), 20, 50, 54 n.210, n.199, 61 n.253, 67, 68, 86, 123, 99, 142, 143, 147, 149, 150, 151, 128, 129, 164 n.34, 166 n.40, 192, 157 n.81, 161, 166-171, 188, 192, 196, cat. #24, 60, 61, 93, 113, I 14, 201, 206, 213, cat. #38, 106, 470, 297, 319, 327, 393, 417 526-533 Caernarvon (Segontium), 42 n.15 7, Benwell (Condercum), 20 n.36, 39, 78, 87-88, 96 n.175, 180, 205, 42 n.157, 61, 101, 111-112, 113, cat. #229 121, 107 n.41, 153, 166 n.40, 206, Caerwent (Venta Silurum), 143, 154, cat. #36, 102, 237, 266, 267, 318, 198 n. 72, cat. #469, 61 7 404, 536, 537, 644, 645 Canterbury, 181, 198 n.72 Bertha, cat. #5 7 Cappuck, cat. #221 Bewcastle (Fan um Cocidi), 39, 61, I 08, Carley Hill Quarry, 162 111 n.48, 112, 117, 121, 162, 206, Carlisle (Luguvalium), 43, 46, 96, 112, cat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476)
    Impact of Empire 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd i 5-4-2007 8:35:52 Impact of Empire Editorial Board of the series Impact of Empire (= Management Team of the Network Impact of Empire) Lukas de Blois, Angelos Chaniotis Ségolène Demougin, Olivier Hekster, Gerda de Kleijn Luuk de Ligt, Elio Lo Cascio, Michael Peachin John Rich, and Christian Witschel Executive Secretariat of the Series and the Network Lukas de Blois, Olivier Hekster Gerda de Kleijn and John Rich Radboud University of Nijmegen, Erasmusplein 1, P.O. Box 9103, 6500 HD Nijmegen, The Netherlands E-mail addresses: [email protected] and [email protected] Academic Board of the International Network Impact of Empire geza alföldy – stéphane benoist – anthony birley christer bruun – john drinkwater – werner eck – peter funke andrea giardina – johannes hahn – fik meijer – onno van nijf marie-thérèse raepsaet-charlier – john richardson bert van der spek – richard talbert – willem zwalve VOLUME 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd ii 5-4-2007 8:35:52 The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476) Economic, Social, Political, Religious and Cultural Aspects Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Roman Empire, 200 B.C. – A.D. 476) Capri, March 29 – April 2, 2005 Edited by Lukas de Blois & Elio Lo Cascio With the Aid of Olivier Hekster & Gerda de Kleijn LEIDEN • BOSTON 2007 This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • English/French
    World Heritage 36 COM WHC-12/36.COM/8D Paris, 1 June 2012 Original: English/French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Thirty-sixth Session Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation 24 June – 6 July 2012 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8D: Clarifications of property boundaries and areas by States Parties in response to the Retrospective Inventory SUMMARY This document refers to the results of the Retrospective Inventory of nomination files of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List in the period 1978 - 1998. To date, seventy States Parties have responded to the letters sent following the review of the individual files, in order to clarify the original intention of their nominations (or to submit appropriate cartographic documentation) for two hundred fifty-three World Heritage properties. This document presents fifty-five boundary clarifications received from twenty-five States Parties, as an answer to the Retrospective Inventory. Draft Decision: 36 COM 8D, see Point IV I. The Retrospective Inventory 1. The Retrospective Inventory, an in-depth examination of the Nomination dossiers available at the World Heritage Centre, ICOMOS and IUCN, was initiated in 2004, in parallel with the launching of the Periodic Reporting exercise in Europe, involving European properties inscribed on the World Heritage List in the period 1978 - 1998. The same year, the Retrospective Inventory was endorsed by the World Heritage Committee at its 7th extraordinary session (UNESCO, 2004; see Decision 7 EXT.COM 7.1).
    [Show full text]
  • A Kink in the Cosmography?
    A Kink in the Cosmography? One vital clue for deciphering Roman-era names is that the order of names in the Ravenna Cosmography is geographically logical. The unknown cosmographer appears to have taken names off maps and/or itineraries that were tolerably accurate, not up to modern cartographic standards, but good enough for Roman soldiers to plan their travels logically. An apparent exception to this logic occurs near Hadrian’s Wall, where RC’s sequence of names runs thus: ... Bereda – Lagubalium – Magnis – Gabaglanda – Vindolande – Lincoigla ... The general course is clear enough, looping up from the south onto the Stanegate road (which was built earlier than the actual Wall) and then going back south. Lagubalium must be Carlisle and Vindolande must be Chesterholm, so it seems obvious that Magnis was at Carvoran and Gabaglanda was at Castlesteads. The problem is that Carvoran lies east of Castlesteads, which would make RC backtrack and put a kink in its path across the ground. Most people will simply say “So what? Cosmo made a mistake. Or his map was wrong. Or the names were written awkwardly on his map.” But this oddity prompted us to look hard at the evidence for names on and around Hadrian’s Wall, as summarised in a table on the following page. How many of the name-to-place allocations accepted by R&S really stand up to critical examination? One discovery quickly followed (a better location for Axelodunum), but many questions remain. For a start, what was magna ‘great’ about the two places that share the name Magnis, Carvoran and Kenchester? Did that name signify something such as ‘headquarters’ or ‘supply base’ in a particular period? Could another site on the Stanegate between Carlisle and Castlesteads be the northern Magnis? The fort at Chapelburn (=Nether Denton, NY59576460) would reduce the size of the kink, but not eliminate it.
    [Show full text]
  • Walking in Hadrian's Wall Country
    Walking in Hadrian’s Wall Country Welcome to Walking in Hadrian’s Wall Country The Granary, Housesteads © Roger Clegg Contents Page An Introduction to Walking in Hadrian’s Wall Country . 3 Helping us to look after Hadrian’s Wall World Heritage Site . 4 Hadrian’s Wall Path National Trail . 6 Three walking itineraries incorporating the National Trail . 8 Walk Grade 1 Fort-to-Fort . .Easy . .10 2 Jesmond Dene – Lord Armstrong’s Back Garden . Easy . .12 3 Around the Town Walls . Easy . .14 4 Wylam to Prudhoe . Easy . .16 5 Corbridge and Aydon Castle . Moderate . .18 6 Chesters and Humshaugh . Easy . 20 7 A “barbarian” view of the Wall . Strenuous . 22 8 Once Brewed, Vindolanda and Housesteads . Strenuous . 24 9 Cawfields to Caw Gap. Moderate . 26 10 Haltwhistle Burn to Cawfields . Strenuous . 28 11 Gilsland Spa “Popping-stone”. Moderate . 30 12 Carlisle City . Easy . 32 13 Forts and Ports . Moderate . 34 14 Roman Maryport and the Smugglers Route . Easy . 36 15 Whitehaven to Moresby Roman Fort . Easy . 38 Section 4 Section 3 West of Carlisle to Whitehaven Gilsland to West of Carlisle 14 13 12 15 2 hadrians-wall.org Cuddy’s Crag © i2i Walltown Crags © Roger Coulam River Irthing Bridge © Graeme Peacock This set of walks and itineraries presents some of the best walking in Hadrian’s Wall Country. You can concentrate on the Wall itself or sample some of the hidden gems just waiting to be discovered – the choice is yours. Make a day of it by visiting some of the many historic sites and attractions along the walks and dwell awhile for refreshment at the cafés, pubs and restaurants that you will come across.
    [Show full text]
  • Notitia Dignitatum Table and Map Chapter 40, the Dux Britanniarum, from the Notitia Dignitatum Occidentis
    Notitia Dignitatum table and map Chapter 40, the dux Britanniarum, from the Notitia Dignitatum Occidentis. Uncertain locations marked with an asterisk*. Placenames have been changed to the generally-accepted Latin spellings, though variations of these spellings are found in the Notitia. 17. At the disposal of viri spectabilis the Duke of the Britains Location 18. Prefect of the 6th Legion York 19. Prefect of the cavalry Dalmatarum at Praesidium *East or North Yorkshire 20. Prefect of the cavalry Crispianorum at Danum Doncaster 21. Prefect of the cavalry catafractariorum at Morbio *Piercebridge 22. Prefect of the unit of barcariorum Tigrisiensium at Arbeia South Shields 23. Prefect of the unit of Nerviorum Dictensium at Dictum *Wearmouth 24. Prefect of the unit vigilum at Concangium Chester-le-Street 25. Prefect of the unit exploratorum at Lavatris Bowes 26. Prefect of the unit directorum at Verteris Brough-under-Stainmore 27. Prefect of the unit defensorum at Braboniacum Kirkby Thore 28. Prefect of the unit Solensium at Maglonis Old Carlisle 29. Prefect of the unit Pacensium at Magis *Piercebridge 30. Prefect of the unit Longovicanorum at Longovicium Lanchester 31. Prefect of the unit supervenientium Petueriensium at Derventione *Malton 32. Along the line of the Wall 33. Tribune of the 4th cohort Lingonum at Segedunum Wallsend 34. Tribune of the 1st cohort Cornoviorum at Pons Aelius Newcastle 35. Prefect of the 1st ala Asturum at Condercum Benwell 36. Tribune of the 1st cohort Frixagorum at Vindobala Rudchester 37. Prefect of the ala Sabiniana at Hunnum Haltonchesters 38. Prefect of the 2nd ala Asturum at Cilurnum Chesters 39.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Roads of Britain
    Roman Roads of Britain A Wikipedia Compilation by Michael A. Linton PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 02:32:02 UTC Contents Articles Roman roads in Britain 1 Ackling Dyke 9 Akeman Street 10 Cade's Road 11 Dere Street 13 Devil's Causeway 17 Ermin Street 20 Ermine Street 21 Fen Causeway 23 Fosse Way 24 Icknield Street 27 King Street (Roman road) 33 Military Way (Hadrian's Wall) 36 Peddars Way 37 Portway 39 Pye Road 40 Stane Street (Chichester) 41 Stane Street (Colchester) 46 Stanegate 48 Watling Street 51 Via Devana 56 Wade's Causeway 57 References Article Sources and Contributors 59 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 61 Article Licenses License 63 Roman roads in Britain 1 Roman roads in Britain Roman roads, together with Roman aqueducts and the vast standing Roman army, constituted the three most impressive features of the Roman Empire. In Britain, as in their other provinces, the Romans constructed a comprehensive network of paved trunk roads (i.e. surfaced highways) during their nearly four centuries of occupation (43 - 410 AD). This article focuses on the ca. 2,000 mi (3,200 km) of Roman roads in Britain shown on the Ordnance Survey's Map of Roman Britain.[1] This contains the most accurate and up-to-date layout of certain and probable routes that is readily available to the general public. The pre-Roman Britons used mostly unpaved trackways for their communications, including very ancient ones running along elevated ridges of hills, such as the South Downs Way, now a public long-distance footpath.
    [Show full text]
  • Hadrian's Wall
    A UNESCO World Heritage Site Hadrian’s Wall Hadrian’s Wall ran for 80 Roman miles (73 modern miles/117 km) from Bowness-in-Solway to Wallsend. It was built to mark the north-west frontier of the Roman Empire and to repel invaders, but its sheer size was also intended to impress and overawe the people outside the empire. The original design There was already a frontier in place before the Wall was built, consisting of a series of forts connected by a road. Hadrian’s Wall was built slightly to the north of this. Most of the Wall was built in stone, with only a 42 km section at the western end built in turf (although this was later replaced by stone). The Wall was first built to be 3m wide. In front of the wall was a large ditch and mound, except where crags or rivers made this unnecessary. In some parts there were branch entanglements (like barbed wire) between the fort and ditch. Branch entanglements were used in some parts between the Wall and Wall ditch. 1 Hadrian’s Wall - Background information A UNESCO World Heritage Site Placed at one-mile intervals there were gates protected by a small-guard post called a milecastle. Between each pair of milecastles lay two towers (turrets), creating a pattern of observation points every third of a mile. The stone wall was approximately 15 feet high (4.6 metres) and 10 Roman feet (3 metres) wide (although the height and width did vary along the wall). It was therefore wide enough for a walkway and parapet wall on the top.
    [Show full text]
  • Ravennas and the Antonine Wall Mannjc *
    Proc Soc Antiq Scot, 122 (1992), 189-195 Ravennas and the Antonine Wall MannJC * ABSTRACT The so-called Ravenna Cosmographer, in his description of Britain, has a very accurate section on Hadrian's Wall, providing an acceptable list of the forts, with their names, in the correct order. This manifestly is case the with not purported his Antoninethe the list for is it Wall,and object of this paper searchto possiblefor reasons this.for INTRODUCTION RAVENNE TH : A COSMOGRAPHE HADRIAN'D RAN S WALL assessinn I informatioe gth n tha Ravenne tth a Cosmographer provide Antonine th r sfo e Wall, s instructivii t looo et kinformatioe th firs t a t n whic suppliee hh r Hadrian'sfo s Wall t mighI . e b t expected tha informatioe tth Antonine th r nfo e Wall woul f comparablo e db e value. Cosmographee Th r list sfort e mos th f Hadrian' o sf o t s Wall maie Th . n sequence appeara n si section in which he is consciously listing a connected list of sites (which he calls civitates) stretching acros countrye sth , even thoug doee ht specificallh sno y describ sitee eth lyins sa g along a Wall (unlike the Notitia Dignitatum, which in a similar situation uses the words per lineam Valli). The Cosmographer states: iterum sunt civitates in ipsa Britania qu(a)e redo tramite de una pane in alia, id est de oceano in oceano esistunt, hac dividunt in tercia porcione ipsam Britaniam, id est. (There are also places in Britain itself, which stand in a direct line from one part to the other, tha fros i t m ocea oceano nt dividd thira an , f edof par Britainf o t : these are.) .
    [Show full text]
  • The Forts on Hadrian S Wall: a Comparative Analysis of the Form and Construction of Some Buildings
    Durham E-Theses The forts on Hadrian s wall: a comparative analysis of the form and construction of some buildings Taylor, David J.A. How to cite: Taylor, David J.A. (1999) The forts on Hadrian s wall: a comparative analysis of the form and construction of some buildings, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4555/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 The forts on Hadrian's Wall: a comparative analysis of the form and construction of some buildings in three volumes David J. A. Taylor 19 JUL Volume 1 The copyright of this thesis rests witli tlie author. No quotation from it should be published widiout the written consent of the author and information derived from it should be acknowledged. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Archaeology, University of Durham, 1999 I confirm that no part of the material offered has previously been submitted by me for a degree in this or in any other University.
    [Show full text]