Interactive Effects of Fuels Reduction and Large Herbivores on Shrub

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Interactive Effects of Fuels Reduction and Large Herbivores on Shrub Forest Ecology and Management 463 (2020) 118031 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Interactive effects of fuels reduction and large herbivores on shrub assemblages in dry conifer forests of the interior west, USA T ⁎ Dallas Hall Defreesa, Joshua P. Averetta, Michael J. Wisdomb, Bryan A. Endressa,c, a Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center – Union Station, Department of Animal and Rangeland Sciences, Oregon State University, Union, OR 97883, USA b Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 1401 Gekeler Lane, La Grande, OR 97850, USA c Eastern Oregon Agricultural and Natural Resource Program, Oregon State University, La Grande, OR 97850, USA ABSTRACT Deciduous shrubs are widely distributed throughout temperate and boreal conifer forests and influence a wide range of ecological processes and forest resources. In the interior western U.S., many deciduous shrubs are highly preferred forage by wild (elk, Cervus canadensis; deer, Odocoileus spp.) and domestic (cattle) ungulates which can influence shrub abundance, composition, structural characteristics, and related ecological processes and interactions. Stand disturbances and silvicultural practices can also affect shrub assemblages and managers in the interior western U.S. are increasingly implementing fuels reduction treatments such as stand thinning and prescribed fire to reduce fuel loads caused by more than a century of fire suppression. We evaluated the effects of ungulate herbivory and fuels reduction, alone and in concert, on deciduous shrub assemblages in coniferous dry forests of the interior west. We measured shrub richness, diversity, height, abundance and community composition in forest stands that underwent fuels reduction 15–17 years earlier, compared to untreated stands where no silvicultural treatments have occurred in over 50 years. Within each stand type, we also measured shrub assemblages in stands with and without ungulate herbivory. Shrub richness, diversity, frequency and height all declined in stands subjected to either fuels reduction treatments or herbivory; effects were most pronounced under the combined effect of fuels reduction and herbivory. Fuels reduction and herbivory also resulted in significant differences in shrub abundance and assemblage composition. Fuels reduction in dry forests with abundant ungulates may contribute to suppressed, more homogenous shrub communities. These effects may result in unintended impacts or alterations to important ecosystem processes and forest resources. Our results highlight the importance of considering responses of forest resources with low economic value, such as shrubs, in forest management activities. 1. Introduction cattle, shrubs are an important forage resource, particularly in late summer through winter, following senescence of herbaceous vegetation Deciduous woody species (shrubs) are a common and integral (Canon et al., 1987; Clark et al., 2013; Hegland and Rydgren, 2016). component of the understory of most conifer forests, and their abun- Under certain conditions, ungulate herbivory can substantially re- dance, richness and structure can influence a wide range of ecological duce or eliminate the functional presence of highly preferred species, processes and forest resources (Johnson and Clausnitzer, 1992; Moser leaving behind fewer, less palatable shrubs on the landscape (Endress and Witmer, 2000; Hagar, 2007a; Kleintjes Neff et al., 2007; Endress et al., 2012; Frerker et al., 2013; Endress et al., 2016; Lilleeng et al., et al., 2012; Lilleeng et al., 2016). Deciduous shrubs and broadleaved 2016). Consequently, strong herbivore pressure is considered a major trees make up a large proportion of plant diversity of temperate and contributor to the decline of shrubs in temperate and boreal forests boreal conifer forests, and their presence can influence soil fertility and (Frerker et al., 2013; Endress et al., 2016; Hegland and Rydgren, 2016), nutrient cycling with the addition of high-quality litter to the soil as resulting in changes to species composition and forest dynamics well as nitrogen fixation by some species (Hagar, 2007a). Shrubs also (Woodward et al.1994; Baker et al., 1997; White et al., 1998; Lilleeng increase structural heterogeneity and complexity in the understory and et al., 2016; Kolstad et al., 2018). Ungulates may also affect the lower canopy layers that promote high biodiversity (Niemi et al., 1998; structural complexity of forest stands by altering shrub architecture and Hagar, 2007a, 2007b; Rooney, 2001; Roberson et al., 2016). They limiting heights below the browse line (height below which shrubs support diverse food webs for insects, soil organisms, and wildlife in- cannot escape heavy browsing pressure; Keigley et al., 2002), resulting cluding small mammals, birds, and bears by providing cover and food in hedged or ‘arrested’ shrubs (Hester et al., 2000; Riggs et al., 2000; resources (e.g., leaves, roots, berries) that differ in composition from Beschta and Ripple, 2012; Endress et al., 2016). Herbivore-related those provided by other vegetation (Berg, 2002; Hagar, 2007b; Briand suppression of the shrub layer can have cascading impacts on stand et al., 2009). For wild and domestic ungulates such as elk, deer and dynamics including: altered competitive interactions between plant ⁎ Corresponding author at: Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center – Union Station, Oregon State University, PO Box E, Union, OR 97883, USA. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (J.P. Averett), [email protected] (M.J. Wisdom), [email protected] (B.A. Endress). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118031 Received 23 August 2019; Received in revised form 19 February 2020; Accepted 24 February 2020 0378-1127/ © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. D. Hall Defrees, et al. Forest Ecology and Management 463 (2020) 118031 species (Pastor et al., 1988; Randall and Walters, 2011); decreased re- stands both fuels treated and exposed to ungulate herbivory. productive potential and establishment of shrubs (Beschta and Ripple, 2008); modified understory shade and subsequent changes to unders- 2. Methods tory herbaceous composition (Woodward et al., 1994); decreased structural complexity of the sub-canopy with related impacts to fauna 2.1. Study area (Hagar, 2007a) and invertebrates (Roberson et al., 2016; Lilleeng et al., 2018); and reduced fruit production that can have cascading effects Research was conducted within the 10,000 ha Starkey Experimental across multiple trophic levels (Ripple et al., 2014). Growth of shrub Forest and Range (SEFR) in the Blue Mountain Ecological Province of species that are highly selected in the diets of ungulates can be sup- northeast Oregon. Elevations range from 1200 m to 1500 m above sea pressed to such a degree that even low herbivore densities may be level. Precipitation averaged 510 mm annually, most of which occurred sufficient to arrest growth below the browse line (Hester et al., 2000; as winter snow or spring rain (Rowland et al., 1997). Late summer Endress et al., 2016). (July-August) is a period of predictably high temperatures, typi- Fuels reduction treatments, including mechanical thinning and cally > 30° C, and sparse precipitation, often totaling < 20 mm and prescribed fire, can also affect shrub assemblages (Willms et al., 2017). defined as drought most years (Prism Climate Group, 2014; National Mechanical thinning and prescribed fire have generally been shown to Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2019). This climate supports reduce shrub abundance and cover in favor of herbaceous vegetation, at drier montane conifer forest types typical of those in the interior wes- least in the short term (Curtis et al., 1998; Willms et al., 2017). Fuels tern United States. Our research specifically focused on coniferous reduction treatments, which usually involve combinations of stand forest stands classified as dry forest potential vegetation types (Burcsu thinning and prescribed fire, are common silvicultural practices in dry et al., 2014) dominated by overstories of Douglas fir(Pseudotsuga coniferous forests of the interior western U.S. Fuels reduction is one of menziesii) and grand fir(Abies grandis). Stands also included Ponderosa the primary forest management goals of national forests in the western pine (Pinus ponderosa), western larch (Larix occidentalis), Englemann U.S., with plans for a significant increase in fuels reduction activities spruce (Picea engelmannii), and lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) with (e.g., Reinhardt et al., 2008; USDA Forest Service, 2018) because fuel varying degrees of overstory subdominance (Franklin and Dyrness, loads in many dry conifer stands greatly exceed those of pre-European 1988). settlement, and constitute a major source of uncharacteristic stand-re- Approximately 500 cow-calf pairs graze SEFR from mid-June to placement fire events (Franklin and Agee, 2003; Hessburg et al., 2005). mid-October annually, with an additional 200 mule deer and 350 elk Despite the increase in fuels reduction efforts in recent years and plans that occupied SEFR from April-November for the last 25 years (Endress to further increase their scale and scope, little is known about how such et al., 2016). Ungulate densities for cattle (7.15/km2), mule deer (1.95/ treatments affect shrub assemblage composition and structure. km2), and elk (4.55/km2) were similar to those outside of SEFR Further complicating our understanding of shrub responses to forest (Wisdom and
Recommended publications
  • Neofusicoccum Arbuti: Survey of a Latent Endophytic Pathogen Reveals Widespread Infection, Broad Host Range, and a Hidden Threat
    Neofusicoccum arbuti: Survey of a latent endophytic pathogen reveals widespread infection, broad host range, and a hidden threat. Rob Roy McGregor Rob Roy McGregor Abstract Arbutus menziesii is an iconic tree species of the Pacific Northwest that has been in decline for the past 40 years. Neofusicoccum arbuti, a latent endophytic fungal pathogen in the Botryosphaeriaceae family, has been implicated as the primary cause of disease in A. menziesii, causing wart-like cankers on the stem and branches when the host is stressed. Neofusicoccum arbuti is suspected of causing the symptoms of decline in A. menziesii in Lighthouse Park in West Vancouver, BC. Little is known about the host range of N. arbuti, which has only been reported on A. menziesii, Vaccinium corymbosum, and once from Cytisus scoparius. A survey of Lighthouse Park was carried out to determine the cause and prevalence of cankers on A. menziesii in Lighthouse Park and to identify additional hosts of N. arbuti. Neofusicoccum arbuti was the fungus most commonly associated with cankers on A. menziesii. The pathogen was isolated from 87% of cankers sampled. Cankers were prevalent throughout the park, with at least 75% of arbutus trees having one or more cankers at the majority of sites. Furthermore, the host range of N. arbuti is much broader than previously thought. Seven non-arbutus hosts, spanning four taxonomic orders were identified, including Amelanchier alnifolia, Cytisus scoparius, Gaultheria shallon, Ilex aquifolium, Rosa sp., Sorbus sitchensis, and Spiraea douglasii. These hosts could act as a reservoir providing additional inoculum or may be infected by spores produced on arbutus.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of the Russian Peak Area Siskiyou County, California James P
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 2-2004 Vascular Plants of the Russian Peak Area Siskiyou County, California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Vascular Plants of the Russian Peak Area Siskiyou County, California" (2004). Botanical Studies. 34. http://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/34 This Flora of Northwest California: Checklists of Local Sites of Botanical Interest is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE RUSSIAN PEAK AREA SISKIYOU COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Edited by John O. Sawyer, Jr. & James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 18 February 2004 Russian Peak (elevation 8196 ft.) is located in the Salmon Mountains, about 12.5 miles south-southwest FLOWERING PLANTS of Etna. It is the highest peak in the Russian Wilderness. The Salmon Mountains are a subunit of Aceraceae the Klamath Mountains. The area is famous for its Acer glabrum var. torreyi diversity of conifer species and for the discovery of the subalpine fir in California, based on the field work Apocynaceae of John Sawyer and Dale Thornburgh. Apocynum androsaemifolium FERNS Berberidaceae Mahonia dictyota Equisetaceae Mahonia nervosa var.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterton Lakes National Park • Common Name(Order Family Genus Species)
    Waterton Lakes National Park Flora • Common Name(Order Family Genus species) Monocotyledons • Arrow-grass, Marsh (Najadales Juncaginaceae Triglochin palustris) • Arrow-grass, Seaside (Najadales Juncaginaceae Triglochin maritima) • Arrowhead, Northern (Alismatales Alismataceae Sagittaria cuneata) • Asphodel, Sticky False (Liliales Liliaceae Triantha glutinosa) • Barley, Foxtail (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Hordeum jubatum) • Bear-grass (Liliales Liliaceae Xerophyllum tenax) • Bentgrass, Alpine (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Podagrostis humilis) • Bentgrass, Creeping (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Agrostis stolonifera) • Bentgrass, Green (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Calamagrostis stricta) • Bentgrass, Spike (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Agrostis exarata) • Bluegrass, Alpine (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa alpina) • Bluegrass, Annual (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa annua) • Bluegrass, Arctic (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa arctica) • Bluegrass, Plains (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa arida) • Bluegrass, Bulbous (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa bulbosa) • Bluegrass, Canada (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa compressa) • Bluegrass, Cusick's (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa cusickii) • Bluegrass, Fendler's (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa fendleriana) • Bluegrass, Glaucous (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa glauca) • Bluegrass, Inland (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa interior) • Bluegrass, Fowl (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa palustris) • Bluegrass, Patterson's (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa pattersonii) • Bluegrass, Kentucky (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa pratensis) • Bluegrass, Sandberg's (Poales
    [Show full text]
  • I INDIVIDUALISTIC and PHYLOGENETIC PERSPECTIVES ON
    INDIVIDUALISTIC AND PHYLOGENETIC PERSPECTIVES ON PLANT COMMUNITY PATTERNS Jeffrey E. Ott A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Biology Chapel Hill 2010 Approved by: Robert K. Peet Peter S. White Todd J. Vision Aaron Moody Paul S. Manos i ©2010 Jeffrey E. Ott ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Jeffrey E. Ott Individualistic and Phylogenetic Perspectives on Plant Community Patterns (Under the direction of Robert K. Peet) Plant communities have traditionally been viewed as spatially discrete units structured by dominant species, and methods for characterizing community patterns have reflected this perspective. In this dissertation, I adopt an an alternative, individualistic community characterization approach that does not assume discreteness or dominant species importance a priori (Chapter 2). This approach was used to characterize plant community patterns and their relationship with environmental variables at Zion National Park, Utah, providing details and insights that were missed or obscure in previous vegetation characterizations of the area. I also examined community patterns at Zion National Park from a phylogenetic perspective (Chapter 3), under the assumption that species sharing common ancestry should be ecologically similar and hence be co-distributed in predictable ways. I predicted that related species would be aggregated into similar habitats because of phylogenetically-conserved niche affinities, yet segregated into different plots because of competitive interactions. However, I also suspected that these patterns would vary between different lineages and at different levels of the phylogenetic hierarchy (phylogenetic scales). I examined aggregation and segregation in relation to null models for each pair of species within genera and each sister pair of a genus-level vascular plant iii supertree.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants Species Checklist
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Crater Lake National Park (CRLA) Species Checklist This species list is a work in progress. It represents information currently in the NPSpecies data system and records are continually being added or updated by National Park Service staff. To report an error or make a suggestion, go to https://irma.nps.gov/npspecies/suggest. Scientific Name Common Name Vascular Plants Alismatales/Araceae [ ] Lemna minor duckweed [ ] * Lysichiton americanus skunk cabbage Alismatales/Potamogetonaceae [ ] Potamogeton pusillus var. tenuissimus Berchtold's pondweed Alismatales/Tofieldiaceae [ ] Tofieldia glutinosa Tofieldia [ ] * Tofieldia occidentalis Apiales/Apiaceae [ ] Angelica genuflexa bentleaf or kneeling angelica [ ] Heracleum lanatum Cow Parsnip [ ] Ligusticum grayi Gray's Licoriceroot, Gray's lovage, Lovage [ ] Lomatium martindalei coast range lomatium, few-fruited lomatium, Martindale's lomatium [ ] Lomatium nudicaule barestem lomatium, pestle parsnip [ ] Lomatium triternatum nineleaf biscuitroot [ ] Osmorhiza berteroi Mountain Sweet Cicely [ ] Osmorhiza depauperata blunt- fruited sweet cicely [ ] Osmorhiza purpurea purple sweet cicely, Sweet Cicely [ ] Oxypolis occidentalis Western Oxypolis, western sweet cicely [ ] Sanicula graveolens northern sanicle, Sierra sanicle [ ] Sphenosciadium capitellatum Swamp Whiteheads, swamp white-heads, woolly-head parsnip Apiales/Araliaceae [ ] Oplopanax horridus Devil's Club Asparagales/Amaryllidaceae [ ] Allium amplectens slim-leaf onion [ ] * Allium geyeri
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Montana Vascular Plants
    Checklist of Montana Vascular Plants June 1, 2011 By Scott Mincemoyer Montana Natural Heritage Program Helena, MT This checklist of Montana vascular plants is organized by Division, Class and Family. Species are listed alphabetically within this hierarchy. Synonyms, if any, are listed below each species and are slightly indented from the main species list. The list is generally composed of species which have been documented in the state and are vouchered by a specimen collection deposited at a recognized herbaria. Additionally, some species are included on the list based on their presence in the state being reported in published and unpublished botanical literature or through data submitted to MTNHP. The checklist is made possible by the contributions of numerous botanists, natural resource professionals and plant enthusiasts throughout Montana’s history. Recent work by Peter Lesica on a revised Flora of Montana (Lesica 2011) has been invaluable for compiling this checklist as has Lavin and Seibert’s “Grasses of Montana” (2011). Additionally, published volumes of the Flora of North America (FNA 1993+) have also proved very beneficial during this process. The taxonomy and nomenclature used in this checklist relies heavily on these previously mentioned resources, but does not strictly follow anyone of them. The Checklist of Montana Vascular Plants can be viewed or downloaded from the Montana Natural Heritage Program’s website at: http://mtnhp.org/plants/default.asp This publication will be updated periodically with more frequent revisions anticipated initially due to the need for further review of the taxonomy and nomenclature of particular taxonomic groups (e.g. Arabis s.l ., Crataegus , Physaria ) and the need to clarify the presence or absence in the state of some species.
    [Show full text]
  • Xerophyllum Tenax) General Technical Report Susan Hummel, Sarah Foltz-Jordan, and Sophia Polasky PNW-GTR-864
    United States Department of Agriculture Natural and Cultural Forest Service History of Beargrass Pacific Northwest Research Station (Xerophyllum tenax) General Technical Report Susan Hummel, Sarah Foltz-Jordan, and Sophia Polasky PNW-GTR-864 October 2012 The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the national forests and national grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, sexual orientation, marital status, family status, status as a parent (in education and training programs and activities), because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program, or retaliation. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs or activities). If you require this information in alternative format (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.), contact the USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (Voice or TDD). If you require information about this program, activity, or facility in a language other than English, contact the agency office responsible for the program or activity, or any USDA office. To file a complaint alleging discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call toll free, (866) 632-9992 (Voice).
    [Show full text]
  • Common Plants of the Upper Klamath Basin
    Common Plants of the Upper Klamath Basin Technical Layout & Design .........Michael Calonje Editor ................................................Sarah Malaby Plant Descriptions & Text ..............Molly Juillerat, Ron Larson, Sarah Malaby, Jeanne Skalka. Photography ...........Michael Calonje, Ron Larson, Sarah Malaby, Terry Spivey. A Special acknowledgement to Klamath County Commissioners Al Switzer, John Elliott and Bill Brown for providing funding for publication costs through PL 06-393 Title III “Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000” Oregon Native Plant Society - Klamath Basin Chapter Rabe Consulting 2007 CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................................................3 Overview ........................................................................................3 Habitats ..........................................................................................4 Plant Exploration in the Upper Klamath Basin .........................6 Growing Native Plants ..................................................................6 Species Groups ..............................................................................7 Ferns and Horsetails ..................................................................7 Conifers .....................................................................................8 Flowering Plants: Flowers, Hardwood Trees, and Shrubs .......9 Flowering Plants: Grasses and Grass-like Plants ...................9 Lichens, Bryophytes, and Blue-green
    [Show full text]
  • Filoha Meadows Open Space Vegetation Descriptions and Stewardship 2007
    Pitkin County Open e.m. ecological, LLC natural resource and restoration consulting Space and Trails Filoha Meadows Open Space Vegetation Descriptions and Stewardship 2007 Preparation by: E.M. Ecological, LLC Natural Resource and Restoration Consulting 0 Hot Springs Ranch, Filoha Meadows Open Space 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND DISCLAIMER 2 VEGETATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 CHAPTER 1 - LAND DISTURBANCE HISTORY 5 CHAPTER 2 - RESOURCE ELEMENT DESCRIPTIONS 8 VEGETATION MAP 9 REFERENCES 23 1 E.M. Ecological, LLC, Natural Resource and Restoration Consulting Hot Springs Ranch, Filoha Meadows Open Space 2007 Acknowledgement and Disclaimer This document has been created thanks to the patience and assistance of Pitkin County Open Space and Trails and their dedication to seeing the beginnings of a comprehensive vegetation document for the Hot Springs Ranch and Filoha Meadows properties. Several years of experiences and investigation of the property have been compiled in this document to provide insight and guidance to assist Open Space Staff in more effectively managing and conserving the quality of the vegetation resources. Actual Open Space policies will not be identified in this document and can be found on the Pitkin County Open Space and Trails website. This document was created to help inform and guide sustainable, natural resource management decisions in regards to the Hot Springs Ranch and Filoha Meadows (HSR & FM) landscapes. This document should not be construed as a complete or formal fire hazard assessment, flood hazard assessment or geologic hazards analysis. The mapped wetlands are only a part of the vegetation assessment and should not be considered wetland delineations. Any mention of commercial products and trade names is simply to better inform and not meant as an endorsement by E.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Ield Key DECEMBER, 1962 Wini:Er Field Key L:O the I:O I:He Native Shrubs Nai:Ive Shrubs of Moni:Ana Of
    ·~ -:: ~t?· :...,~ ::.. : ·.: · ·~ BULLETIN NO. 23 Winter ield Key DECEMBER, 1962 Wini:er Field Key l:o the i:o i:he Native Shrubs Nai:ive Shrubs of Moni:ana of Montana MELVIN S. MORRIS Professor of Range Management Montana State University JACK E. SCHMAUTZ Range Conservationist Northern Region, U. S. Forest Service PETER F. STICKNEY Range Conservationist (Research) Int<>rmountain Forest and Range Experiment Station U. S. Forest Service Illustrated by C. V. Janda MONTANA FOREST AND CONSERVATION EXPERIMENT STATION Montana State l'niversity a.nd l\1. S. JUORIUS J. E. SCH!\IAUTZ P. F. STICKNEY INTERl\IOt'~TAIN FOREST AND RA~GE EXPERil\tEXT STATIOS Forest Sen•ice Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station V. S. Departmt>nt of Agriculture l\1ontana State University \. and ), 1962 lnt.-•nuountain Forest and Range t:xpt~ rlment Station J..... orest Service U. 8. !Jepartrnent of Agriculture Taxonomic Changes as of January 2015 Linanthus pungens - granite prickly phlox Gilia pungens: old name Acer glabrum- Rocky Mountain maple var. douglasii: deeply lobed to divided leaves and red twigs. Paxistima myrsinites var. glabrum: shallowly lobed leaves and gray twigs. Pachistima or Pachystima myrsinites: old name ** Varieties intergrade ecologically and geographically. Populus acuminata is actually thought to be a hybrid Alnus incana - thin-leaved alder between P. deltoides and P. angustifolia Alnus tenuifolia: old name In Montana our plants are subspecies tenufolia. Populus balsamifera - black or balsam cottonwood Populus trichocarpa: old name Alnus viridis- green or Sitka alder Alnus sinuata, Alnus crispa: old names Rhus aromatica - skunkbush sumac In Montana our plants are subspecies sinuata. Rhus trilobata: old name Atriplex gardneri - Gardner's saltbush Toxicodendron rydbergii - poison ivy Atriplex nuttallii: old (misapplied) name Rhus radicans, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Plants of Northeastern Utah
    MOUNTAIN PLANTS OF NORTHEASTERN UTAH Original booklet and drawings by Berniece A. Andersen and Arthur H. Holmgren Revised May 1996 HG 506 FOREWORD In the original printing, the purpose of this manual was to serve as a guide for students, amateur botanists and anyone interested in the wildflowers of a rather limited geographic area. The intent was to depict and describe over 400 common, conspicuous or beautiful species. In this revision we have tried to maintain the intent and integrity of the original. Scientific names have been updated in accordance with changes in taxonomic thought since the time of the first printing. Some changes have been incorporated in order to make the manual more user-friendly for the beginner. The species are now organized primarily by floral color. We hope that these changes serve to enhance the enjoyment and usefulness of this long-popular manual. We would also like to thank Larry A. Rupp, Extension Horticulture Specialist, for critical review of the draft and for the cover photo. Linda Allen, Assistant Curator, Intermountain Herbarium Donna H. Falkenborg, Extension Editor Utah State University Extension is an affirmative action/equal employment opportunity employer and educational organization. We offer our programs to persons regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age or disability. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Robert L. Gilliland, Vice-President and Director, Cooperative Extension
    [Show full text]
  • Special Forest Products
    United States Department of Agriculture SPECIAL FOREST PRODUCTS Forest Service Species Information Guide Pacific Northwest Research Station for the Pacific Northwest General Technical Report PNW-GTR-513 Nan C. Vance, Melissa Borsting, David Pilz, and September 2001 Jim Freed Authors Nan C. Vance is a principle plant physiologist, and David Pilz is a botanist, For- estry Sciences Laboratory, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331; Melissa Borsting is a graduate student, College of Forest Resources, University of Wash- ington, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195; and Jim Freed is an extension special forest products specialist, Washington State University, PO Box 4703, Olympia, WA 98504. Disclaimer This publication reports research and management information involving mush- room and plant harvesting. It neither recommends the use and ingestion of mush- rooms and plants nor implies that using wild plants and mushrooms is without risks. CAUTION: Mushroom and wild plant consumption can pose a serious, even fatal, risk to humans. It is strongly recommended that you spend your first collecting season using field identification guides and collecting with an expert if you intend to collect wild plants or mushrooms to eat. Abstract Vance, Nan C.; Borsting, Melissa; Pilz, David; Freed, Jim. 2001. Special forest products: species information guide for the Pacific Northwest. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-513. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 169 p. This guide is a collection of information about economically important vascular and nonvascular plants and fungi found in the Pacific Northwest that furnish special forest products. Many of these plants and fungi are also found in Alaska, northern Idaho, and western Montana.
    [Show full text]