DOCSLIB.ORG

Blood on the Coal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Blood on the Coal Blood on the Coal The origins and future of New Zealand’s Accident Compensation scheme Blood on the Coal The origins and future of New Zealand’s Accident Compensation scheme Hazel Armstrong 2008 Oh, it’s easy money stacking carcasses in the half-dark. It’s easy money dodging timber that would burst you like a tick. yes, easy as pie as a piece of cake as falling off a log. Or being felled by one. extract from The Ballad of Fifty-One by Bill Sewell Hazel Armstrong is the principal of the Wellington firm Hazel Armstrong Law, which specialises in ACC law, employment law, occupational health and safety, occupational disease, vocational rehabilitation and retraining, and employment-related education. ISBN no. 978-0-473-13461-7 Publisher: Trade Union History Project, PO Box 27-425 Wellington, www.tuhp.org.nz First edition printed 2007 Revised and expanded edition printed May 2008 Acknowledgements The author would like to thank: Social Policy Evaluation and Research Linkages (SPEARS) funding programme for the Social Policy Research Award Rob Laurs for co-authoring the first edition Hazel Armstrong Law for additional funding to undertake the research Dr Grant Duncan, Senior Lecturer in Social and Public Policy Programmes, Massey University, Albany Campus, for academic supervision Sir Owen Woodhouse, Chair, Royal Commission of Inquiry into Compensation for Personal Injury in New Zealand (1969) for discussing the origins of the ACC scheme Mark Derby for editing the draft text Dave Kent for design and production DISCLAIMER The views expressed in this paper should not be taken to represent the views or policy of the Social Policy Evaluation and Research Committee (‘SPEaR’). Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information, no responsibility is accepted for the reliance by any person on any information contained in this paper, nor for any error in or omission from the paper. 4 IntroduCtIon When introduced in 1974, New Zealand’s state-run ACC scheme was the world’s first fully comprehensive, no-fault system for personal injury compensation. The scheme remains internationally unique today. No other country has found a more successful population-wide approach to addressing the multiple problems resulting from personal injury. S this booklet explains, three major events in our ahistory shaped our current ACC scheme. The first occurred in 1896 on the West Coast when an explosion in the Brunner coal mine killed 65 miners and left widows, children and elderly family members without adequate financial support. The second key event followed World War One, when injured soldiers returned to this country to find themselves unemployed, on meagre pensions and without adequate rehabilitation. Efforts to avoid repeating this social betrayal after World War Two were further developed by the chief architect of New Zealand’s accident compensation scheme, Sir Owen Woodhouse, whose 1972 report ushered in the era of a comprehensive, 24-hour, no-fault accident compensation scheme, administered by ACC.1 The guiding principles of the Woodhouse 1 ACC, as an organisation, first came into being in report still form the bedrock of the current accident 1974 with the passage compensation scheme. into law of the Accident Compensation Act 1972. However, these principles have been compromised by the ascendency of neo-liberal ideology and its influence on social policy in the late 1980s and 1990s. The Accident Rehabilitation and Insurance Act 1992, which came into force in the midst of the Bolger-led National government’s cutbacks to social welfare spending, exemplifies the shift 5 towards neo-liberalism. While most of the 1992 Act has since been repealed, the vestiges of several key provisions remain, notably work capacity testing that enables the insurer, ACC, to restrict its own liability but often results in adverse outcomes for claimants. Neo-liberal deregulation further impacted on ACC when, for a brief period from July 1999 to June 2000, New Zealanders were given a glimpse of a privatised accident compensation scheme for work injuries. The opposition National Party has signaled that if it becomes the government after the 2008 election, it intends to re-privatise the ACC scheme, thereby re-introducing private insurance companies into the accident insurance 2 “National’s policy marketplace.2 This booklet argues for the retention of ACC is to re-establish a competitive market as a state-monopoly accident insurance provider. to provide accident insurance.” (National In March 2008 the ACC scheme was independently Party Leader John Key, Address to NZ Large reviewed by PricewaterhouseCoopers. The review described Herds Association our ACC scheme as ‘the only system in the world that Conference, 21 March 2007 provides universal, 24-hour coverage for all accidental physical injuries. ACC was a groundbreaking world leader at its inception and remains today highly regarded by many 3 Pricewaterhouse- experts in the field of accident compensation.”3 The review Coopers, Executive summary, Accident concluded that “the current ACC scheme is consistent Compensation with the Woodhouse principles, adds considerable value Corporation in New Zealand, scheme review, to New Zealand society and economy, and performs very March 2008, p. i]. well in comparison to alternative schemes in operation 4 Ibid, p. xviii internationally.”4 The author of this booklet is a lawyer specialising in employment, accident compensation, and health and safety law. My professional experience has convinced me that a privatised accident compensation system, as proposed by National, would retard claimants’ rehabilitation and weaken injury prevention programmes. 6 I do not, however, claim that the current ACC scheme is ideal, since not all of Sir Owen Woodhouse’s original recommendations were fully and properly implemented. In particular, I argue that changes to the scheme are needed to deliver effective and meaningful rehabilitation to victims of accidents. Thirty-three years after New Zealanders gave up the right to sue employers for accident compensation in favour of a fairer, more effective and universal system by which the whole community takes responsibility for accident victims, our ACC scheme, still the envy of the world, is at an historic crossroads. The 2008 general election offers an opportunity to retain the valuable features of this groundbreaking and socially equitable scheme, and to further improve it along the lines intended by its original architect. This booklet is intended to help you, the voter, consider the issues affecting our ACC scheme at the next election. It traces the origins of the scheme from the grossly inequitable and cumbersome system which preceded it, when workers were obliged to sue their employers for compensation for workplace injuries, into a system based on principles of fairness for all and shared community responsibility. It outlines how, in my view as a compensation law practitioner, the proposed privatisation of personal injury insurance would be detrimental to claimants and to society in general. I argue that certain aspects of the current scheme, dealing with the full rehabilitation of accident victims, are not working as effectively and fairly as they should. Finally, I provide a list of questions to ask of your election candidates, to help make ACC an election issue and to guide you in voting for its future. Hazel Armstrong April 2008 7 8 WorkIng In the slough of despond: 1870s – 1900 For over 100 years New Zealand workers have received statutory protection in the form of a workers’ compensation scheme, although for most of that time the amount of compensation was often inadequate, and the process for claiming and receiving it was arduous and uncertain. N the nineteenth century, British immigrants brought Ito New Zealand their understanding of workers’ rights and labour laws from an Old World entering an industrial age. In Britain, the increasing use of steam power, negligible safety standards and abject working conditions in factories and fields had created extremely hazardous working environments, and there was growing recognition that some form of legal protection should be afforded to workers. Workplace deaths and injuries resulting from poor working conditions led to workers claiming compensation from their employers. As the pressure on negligent employers grew, judicial minds were exercised and the judiciary developed common law defences that made it increasingly difficult for injured workers to succeed in their claims.5 The British courts tested liability against the fault 5 ‘Common law’ refers to the body of law principle – fault had to be attributed to a party for a claim established through for damages to succeed. This principle was used to reduce court action, rather than by Parliament. the economic demands on industry as well as on the cost of production. 6 Alan Clayton. “Some An “unholy trinity” of employer defences dominated reflections on the Woodhouse and ACC the landscape of nineteenth-century British industrial legacy” (2003) 34 law, comprising the doctrine of common employment6, VUWLR p449-450 9 7 The case of Priestley v voluntary assumption of risk and contributory negligence.7 Fowler (1837) 3 M&W1 established the principle Each of these employer defences eroded workers’ rights by of ‘common employment’ diluting employer responsibility in the event of workplace which stated that an employee was deemed injury or death. In addition to these common law defences, to have accepted the risk the English Parliament introduced the statutory roadblock of injury as a result of any fellow employee’s action. of limitation periods, which prevented legal actions being The doctrine of voluntary brought after a specified time period. This system was assumption of risk (or volenti non fit injuria) transferred largely unchanged to the booming, free-for- prescribed that on all colony of New Zealand. Any worker injured at their taking employment a worker voluntarily workplace was not entitled to compensation as of right, accepted the hazards of the job.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Court of Appeal, 1958
    The Court of Appeal, 1958 (from left) WSTICE CLEARY; WSTICE GRESSON, President; WSTICE BARROWCLOUGH, Chief Justice; WSTICE NORTH The Court of Appeal, 1968 (from left) JUSTICE McCARTHY; JUSTICE NORTH, President; JUSTICE WILD, Chief Justice; JUSTICE TURNER. Inset: Temporary judges of the Court of Appeal (left) JUSTICE WOODHOUSE; (right) JUSTICE RICHMOND. JUDGES AT WORK: THE NEW ZEALAND COURT OF APPEAL (1958-1976) BY PETER SPILLER* I. INTRODUCTION On 11 September 1957, the New Zealand Attorney-General, the Hon John Marshall, moved the second reading of the Bill for the establishment of a "permanent and separate" Court of Appeal. He declared that this was "a notable landmark in our judicial history and a significant advance in the administration of justice in New Zealand".! The Bill was duly passed and the Court commenced sitting in February 1958. In this article I shall analyse the reasons for the creation of the so-called "permanent and separate" Court of Appeal. I shall then examine the Court of Appeal judiciary, the relationship between the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, and the work of the Court of Appeal, during the tenures of the first four Presidents of the Court. I shall conclude by assessing the extent to which the expectations of the Court at its outset were realised in the period under review. The aim of this article is to provide insight into the personalities and processes that have shaped the development of the law in the highest local Court in New Zealand. II. GENESIS OF THE "PERMANENT AND SEPARATE" COURT OF APPEAL The New Zealand Court of Appeal existed as an effective entity from February 1863, when it commenced sitting in terms of the Court of Appeal Act 1862.2 The Court had been established in response to requests by the judges for a Court within New Zealand which would provide a level of appeal more accessible than that which lay to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London.3 The Court was composed of all the judges of the Supreme Court.
    [Show full text]
  • From Privy Council to Supreme Court: a Rite of Passage for New Zealand’S Legal System
    THE HARKNESS HENRY LECTURE FROM PRIVY COUNCIL TO SUPREME COURT: A RITE OF PASSAGE FOR NEW ZEALAND’S LEGAL SYSTEM BY PROFESSOR MARGARET WILSON* I. INTRODUCTION May I first thank Harkness Henry for the invitation to deliver the 2010 Lecture. It gives me an opportunity to pay a special tribute to the firm for their support for the Waikato Law Faculty that has endured over the 20 years life of the Faculty. The relationship between academia and the profession is a special and important one. It is essential to the delivery of quality legal services to our community but also to the maintenance of the rule of law. Harkness Henry has also employed many of the fine Waikato law graduates who continue to practice their legal skills and provide leadership in the profession, including the Hamilton Women Lawyers Association that hosted a very enjoyable dinner in July. I have decided this evening to talk about my experience as Attorney General in the establish- ment of New Zealand’s new Supreme Court, which is now in its fifth year. In New Zealand, the Attorney General is a Member of the Cabinet and advises the Cabinet on legal matters. The Solici- tor General, who is the head of the Crown Law Office and chief legal official, is responsible for advising the Attorney General. It is in matters of what I would term legal policy that the Attorney General’s advice is normally sought although Cabinet also requires legal opinions from time to time. The other important role of the Attorney General is to advise the Governor General on the appointment of judges in all jurisdictions except the Mäori Land Court, where the appointment is made by the Minister of Mäori Affairs in consultation with the Attorney General.
    [Show full text]
  • Māori Land and Land Tenure in New Zealand: 150 Years of the Māori Land Court
    77 MĀORI LAND AND LAND TENURE IN NEW ZEALAND: 150 YEARS OF THE MĀORI LAND COURT R P Boast* This is a general historical survey of New Zealand's Native/Māori Land Court written for those without a specialist background in Māori land law or New Zealand legal history. The Court was established in its present form in 1865, and is still in operation today as the Māori Land Court. This Court is one of the most important judicial institutions in New Zealand and is the subject of an extensive literature, nearly all of it very critical. There have been many changes to Māori land law in New Zealand since 1865, but the Māori Land Court, responsible for investigating titles, partitioning land blocks, and various other functions (some of which have later been transferred to other bodies) has always been a central part of the Māori land system. The article assesses the extent to which shifts in ideologies relating to land tenure, indigenous cultures, and customary law affected the development of the law in New Zealand. The article concludes with a brief discussion of the current Māori Land Bill, which had as one of its main goals a significant reduction of the powers of the Māori Land Court. Recent political developments in New Zealand, to some extent caused by the government's and the New Zealand Māori Party's support for the 2017 Bill, have meant that the Bill will not be enacted in its 2017 form. Current developments show once again the importance of Māori land issues in New Zealand political life.
    [Show full text]
  • Rationing’ in New Zealand 1968-C.1980
    The “Ugly Sister of Welfare” The idea of health care ‘rationing’ in New Zealand 1968-c.1980 Deborah Salter Submitted for the Degree of MA in History Victoria University of Wellington November 2011 Abstract This thesis explores the influence of healthcare ‘rationing’ in New Zealand from 1968 to c.1980. Rationing is a term and concept drawn from health economics and the history of the idea will be traced as well as its influence. The influence of rationing will primarily be explored through case studies: the supply of specialist staff to New Zealand’s public hospitals, the building of hospitals (and specialist units in particular) and the supply of medical technology. This era has been selected for historical examination because of the limited attention paid to it in studies of the health service, and more generally, welfare histories of New Zealand. Often in these studies the 1970s is overshadowed by the period health of reform in the 1980s and 1990s. Contents Acknowledgements List of Acronyms Chapter One, Introduction p. 1 Chapter Two, The road to rationing p. 19 Chapter Three, Rationing and Specialist Treatment p. 44 Chapter Four, Specialist ‘Manpower’ p. 67 Chapter Five, Buildings and Technology p. 90 Conclusion p. 111 Bibliography p. 116 Appendices p. 124 Acknowledgements I would like to thank all those who have supported me in any way, large or small, whilst I was working on this thesis. I would also like to acknowledge the financial support of the Victoria University Masters Scholarship and the F.P Wilson Scholarship in New Zealand History. Thank you to Capital and Coast District Health Board who kindly granted me access to some of their archival holdings.
    [Show full text]
  • Closer Settlement in the Early Liberal Era
    123 WOE UNTO THEM THAT LAY FIELD TO FIELD: CLOSER SETTLEMENT IN THE EARLY LIBERAL ERA Monique van Alphen Fyfe* This article undertakes a re-examination of the origins, construction and application of the Land for Settlements legislation in the early Liberal era. The Liberal's commitment to closer settlement reveals part of the story of highly contested land policy in colonial New Zealand. Land for Settlements legislation of the 1890s, aimed at "bursting up" the great estates, was predominantly the product of settlers' ideological aspirations and two determined politicians: John Ballance and John McKenzie. When measured against the rhetoric used to promote it, however, the policy was not necessarily effective: it was complicated by practical realities and a narrow vision of New Zealand as a vigorous Arcadian paradise. When contrasted with the treatment of Māori land, yet more of the complexity of the land issue and the frailties of the actors facing it are revealed. The article concludes by proposing that Liberal policy, while flawed in execution, may have nevertheless contributed something to the consolidation of the concept of New Zealand as an agrarian ideal, a concept that remains largely intact today. I INTRODUCING AN IDEOLOGY Ill fares the land, to hastening ills a prey; where wealth accumulates, and men decay.1 Liberal land policy has been an evocative and much examined topic for historians of decades past. The emergence of Waitangi Tribunal histories has since tended to homogenise Crown land policy such that very real shifts in government initiatives risk becoming overlooked. Land policy was, in fact, highly contested in colonial New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Accident Compensation in Swiss and New Zealand
    ACCIDENT COMPENSATION IN SWISS AND NEW ZEALAND LAW – SOME SELECTED ISSUES THAT UNDERMINE THE PURPOSE IN BOTH SCHEMES By Yvonne Wampfler Rohrer A dissertation submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws Victoria University of Wellington 2009 ABSTRACT This dissertation analyses selected issues that undermine the coherence and the purposes of the Swiss and New Zealand accident compensation schemes. Unlike other European states the Swiss accident compensation provides cover for non-work related accidental injury, which makes it a useful subject of comparison with the New Zealand accident compensation scheme which provides a comprehensive, no fault compensation scheme for personal injury. In undertaking a largely comparative approach the paper argues that both schemes have drifted away considerably from the original underlying purpose to provide compensation for work incapacity and, on the other hand, to restore the claimant to a level of work capacity as soon as possible. This thesis is illustrated by examining the vulnerability of the schemes to political change, the arbitrary dichotomy between incapacity to work caused by accidental injury and incapacity caused by sickness, the definitions of an accident in both schemes and the assessment of evidence. The paper finds that both schemes should be amended and suggests alternative approaches for each issue. STATEMENT ON WORD LENGTH The text of this paper (excluding abstract, table of contents, table of cases,
    [Show full text]
  • Māori Representation in a Shrunken Parliament
    New Zealand Journal of History, 52, 2 (2018) Māori Representation in a Shrunken Parliament IN A REFERENDUM held in conjunction with New Zealand’s 2011 general election, Māori overwhelmingly supported the retention of the Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) voting system introduced in 1996. Māori support for MMP was significantly less equivocal than that of the general population.1 The extent of support is understandable. MMP brought many benefits for Māori voters, most obviously a large increase in Māori representation in Parliament.2 The bulk of Māori votes were no longer tied up in just four electorates where they could often be safely ignored. With all votes being equal, political parties had a heightened motivation to pay heed to Māori aspirations and to put forward Māori candidates. The benefits of MMP for Māori were increased through the retention of seats reserved for voters of Māori descent, along with the innovation of linking the number of such seats directly with the numbers enrolled to vote in them. In 1996 the number of Māori seats increased to five under the new rules, and further increased to seven in 2002.3 Previously the number of reserved Māori seats was fixed at four, and had been since 1867.4 New Zealand adopted MMP following a binding referendum held in 1993. In 1990 Ranginui Walker summarized some of the faults with the electoral system then in place, pointing to both historical and ongoing discrimination. Whereas the secret ballot applied in European electorates from 1870, it did not apply in Māori electorates until 1937.5 There were no Māori electoral rolls until 1949 and compulsory voter registration was not introduced for Māori until 1956.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Sector, Vol. 30, (4) 2008
    PUBLIC SECTOR Public Sector, Vol. 30, (4) 2008 Articles The changing nature of parliamentary practice Politics and administration Reflections on the partnership between the School of Government and the State services State-owned Enterprise governance News Fellowship and Distinguished Service Awards Submission IPANZ’s submission to the investigation into the Public Service recruitment and employment of Madeleine Setchell Publisher Institute of Public Administration New Zealand. P O Box 5032, Wellington, New Zealand. Phone +64 4 463 6940 Fax: +64 4 463 6939 PUBLIC Email: [email protected] The whole of the literary matter of Public Sector is copyright ©2007 – IPANZ Editor Allen Petrey SECTOR Layout Hettie Barnard Volume 30 Number 4 2008 ISSN 0110-5191 Editorial Office c/- The Publisher as above Contents Editorial Committee Articles Tom Berthold Ralph Chapman The changing nature of parliamentary practice Chris Eichbaum by David McGee .................................................................................................................... 2 Geoff Lewis Allen Petrey Politics and administration: some reflections on the ‘Setchell Affair’ (or Michael Reid boundary riding in the purple zone) Carol Stigley by Chris Eichbaum and Richard Shaw ................................................................................... 8 Advertising Reflections on the partnership between the School of Government and Jay Matthes the State services: where to from here? Phone: +64 4 463 6940 by Gary Hawke ....................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory Report
    Date: October 2013 Seddon Statue Parliament Grounds, Molesworth Street, Thorndon, Wellington WCC Image 2014 Summary of heritage significance • The statue of Richard Seddon has architectural value for the quality of its sculpting and craftsmanship. It also admirably fills the space, dominating Parliament’s forecourt and interacting well with the grounds. • The statue of Richard Seddon has historical importance, as it commemorates one of New Zealand’s most important Prime Ministers. The statue’s maker, Sir Thomas Brock, was an important sculptor of considerable renown. The connection with Thomas Brock gives the statue added historical importance. • The statue of Richard Seddon makes a strong contribution to a sense of place for Parliament. Structurally, the Parliamentary precinct is dominated, and very much defined, by the Beehive, Parliament House, and the Parliamentary library. However, the statue, along with that of John Ballance, importantly injects a degree of humanity into the grounds, reinforcing the idea that Government is made of the people. • The statue of Richard Seddon is held in very high public esteem. Seddon is still thought of as one of New Zealand’s most important Prime Ministers, especially for the significant pieces of social legislation passed during his reign. The statue is an icon of New Zealand’s Parliament and its grounds, and often a prop for protests. 1 Date: October 2013 District Plan: Map 18, object reference 36 Legal Description: Secs 1210 1211 SO 24133 Town of Wellington Heritage Area: Parliament Heritage Area
    [Show full text]
  • Nzjer, 2014, 39(1)
    Contents Page: NZJER, 2014, 39(1) Name Title Page Number Felicity Lamm, Erling Editorial Rasmussen and Rupert 1 Tipples Raymond Markey, Exploring employee participation Candice Harris, Herman and work environment in hotels: 2-20 Knudsen, Jens Lind and Case studies from Denmark and David Williamson New Zealand Erling Rasmussen, The major parties: National’s and Michael Fletcher and Labour’s employment relations 21-32 Brian Hannam policies Julienne Molineaux and The Minor Parties: Policies, Peter Skilling Priorities and Power 33-51 Danaë Anderson and Are vulnerable workers really Tipples protected in New Zealand? 52-67 Nigel Haworth and Commentary – The New Zealand Brenda Pilott Public Sector: Moving Beyond 68-78 New Public Management? Venkataraman Nilakant, Research Note: Conceptualising Bernard Walker, Kate Adaptive Resilience using 79-86 van Heugen, Rosemar Grounded Theory Baird and Herb de Vries Sir Geoffrey Palmer Eulogy for the Rt Hon Sir Owen Woodhouse 87-91 Ross Wilson Obituary 92-93 New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 39(1): 1 Editorial This issue shows the diverse range of employment relations issues in New Zealand. We begin with Markey et al.’s paper which reports on research into employee participation and well-being in the New Zealand hospitality sector and then compares it to the famous ‘Danish Model’. While Danish formal employee participation structures are clearly well embedded, this article shows that there is a more complex picture with several direct forms of participation available in New Zealand hospitality firms. However, the article also indicates that some of the direct forms of participation can be associated with negative well-being effects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Cook Island Migration to New Zealand, 1920-1950
    The Origins of Cook Island Migration to New Zealand, 1920-1950 Rosemary Anderson A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Master of Arts in History at the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand September 2014 Abstract It is a little known fact that New Zealand was both a British colony and imperial power in the Pacific during the twentieth century. From 1901 to 1965, under the pretext of a civilising mission, New Zealand exercised moral responsibility for the Cook Islands. Beneficent overtones concealed the colony’s quest for territory and power, and political rhetoric continues to ignore the deficiencies and injustices of their former rule. As patriotic British subjects, and nominal citizens of New Zealand, the Cook Islanders looked to their colonial rulers for a pathway into the modern world. Contact with administrators, teachers, traders and missionaries instilled a sense of kinship, and mass movement to New Zealand in the post-war era is a recognised consequence of these historic ties. This migration is generally regarded as an immediate response to employment opportunities at that time. This thesis explores the social realities of New Zealand’s colonial relationship with the Cook Islands. It draws primarily on the records of the Island Territories Department to address issues of citizenship and status in relation to the Cook Islands’ people. Efforts to control population movement and monitor Cook Islanders in New Zealand bring the powers of New Zealand officials under scrutiny. This approach uncovers the nature of New Zealand rule, and exposes the political and socioeconomic forces that fostered Island discontent. Focusing on the dissemination of knowledge, this history traces the Islanders evolving awareness of the wider world from the time of European contact.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiwi Keith: a Biography of Keith Holyoake
    REVIEWS (BOOKS) 103 Kiwi Keith: A Biography of Keith Holyoake. By Barry Gustafson. Auckland University Press, Auckland, 2007. viii, 429pp. NZ price: $59.95. ISBN 978-1-86940-400-0. THIS IS A COMPREHENSIVE and eminently readable biography which will confirm the view of those who, like this reviewer, rate Keith Holyoake highly among New Zealand’s twentieth-century Prime Ministers. Keith Holyoake’s early life and career are covered briefly. His rural upbringing is not sentimentalized, and the early promise of his first period in Parliament is noted. I would have liked a little more on the beginnings of Holyoake’s relationship with Norma Ingram; she emerges through brief references as forceful and down to earth. There is a full discussion of the deal by which Holyoake secured his Pahiatua farm; the purchase price was not far short of a million dollars in today’s terms and Holyoake had to find only a sixth of it. Although not exactly improper, it is clear that Holyoake was not averse to mixing business and politics. His long association with A.E. Davy is also hard to reconcile with the image of the benign centrist. The discussion of the Holland administration and Holyoake’s part in it is a prelude to the long premiership. Holyoake was a successful and competent Minister of Agriculture, and his instincts in 1951 were a little more conciliatory than Sidney Holland’s and William Sullivan’s. I would have liked more on the broad approach of that administration; apart from Holland’s last disastrous year there is little on Holyoake as Deputy Prime Minister.
    [Show full text]