DOCSLIB.ORG

Tapra 2015 Conference Programme P a G E | 1 TABLE of CONTENTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Conference 2015 Conference Programme 8th - 10th September 2015 PUBLISHERS AT TAPRA 2015 The following publishers will be present at the TaPRA 2015 Conference. Their display stands will be located in the Quandrangle Court where all refreshments and lunches will be served daily Manchester University Press Matthew Frost [email protected] Palgrave Macmillan Jenny McCall [email protected] Lucinda Knight [email protected] Bloomsbury Publishing Mark Dudgeon [email protected] Emily Hockley [email protected] Cambridge University Press Kerr Alexander [email protected] Routledge Marie Coffey [email protected] Claire Spence [email protected] Ben Piggott [email protected] Kate Edwards [email protected] Intellect [email protected] WELCOME TO TAPRA 2015 @ WORCESTER Last year we celebrated TaPRA @ 10 at Royal Holloway, this year we look forward to the next decade for TaPRA with our conference hosts at the University of Worcester. A record number of members booked early this year and we have a packed conference programme but, as always, there will be plenty of opportunities to meet old friends and make new connections with colleagues representing the rich and diverse research interests of our field. There are a number of ‘new’ things to note this year: a new Working Group, Performance and Science, has its first full meeting in Worcester, bringing the number of Working Groups to twelve, with a proposal for a thirteenth group, Asian Performance and Diaspora gathering to test the level of interest from the membership. Another initiative making its debut at Worcester is Research Matters, the first in a series of conference panels curated by TaPRA’s executive committee and designed to respond to issues of current importance to the wider research community. This year’s discussion brings together four panel members from REF2014 who will share their experience and knowledge of the process by looking forward to the potential we can realise for the research future of our discipline. TaPRA’s Executive Committee is also looking forward to ways in which we can forge stronger links with SCUDD and other organisations committed to demonstrating the importance of Arts research and practice in our HEIs and out to our cultural industries. As individual researchers and members of TaPRA our vision and ambitions for theatre and performance research are worth supporting. There will be opportunities to become conveners of Working Groups over the coming year, or perhaps you might put yourself forward as a candidate for the Executive Committee? Thanks to everyone who has given time and energy to TaPRA over the past year and thanks especially to our hosts at Worcester for 2015. Next year, we will be in Bristol. Gilli Bush-Bailey (Chair) TaPRA 2015 Conference Programme P a g e | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Welcome to TaPRA 2015 @ Worcester ............................................................ 1 TaPRA Practice-as-Research Exhibition 2015 .................................................... 3 Keynote Speakers ..................................................................................... 4 Performance ............................................................................................ 6 Postgraduate Events .................................................................................. 8 Conference Schedule ................................................................................. 9 TaPRA Curated Panel ................................................................................ 14 Abstracts and Biography ............................................................................ 16 Applied & Social Theatre .......................................................................... 17 20th-21st Century Performer Training............................................................. 28 Directing and Dramaturgy ......................................................................... 36 Documenting Performance ........................................................................ 44 Performance and the Body ........................................................................ 48 Performance, Identity and Community .......................................................... 58 Performance and New Technologies ............................................................. 66 Performance and Science .......................................................................... 80 Popular Performance ............................................................................... 87 Scenography ......................................................................................... 95 Theatre History and Historiography ............................................................. 102 Theatre, Performance and Philosophy .......................................................... 110 TaPRA Working Group Conveners ............................................................... 120 TaPRA 2015 Delegate List ......................................................................... 122 Useful Information for Delegates ................................................................ 134 P a g e | 2 TaPRA 2015 Conference Programme TAPRA PRACTICE-AS-RESEARCH EXHIBITION 2015 Image source: Rebecca Gamble. Instruments for a participatory performance entitled ‘Mariela Hosomaki’ researching the role between performer (host) and audience (host) in a one-to-one gastronomic performance. The Practice-as-Research Exhibition, curated by Rebecca Gamble, explores research inquiry through practice (Frayling 1993). The exhibition examines the intimate relationship between theory and practice and reveals different practice-as-research methodologies through visual examples of work. These include printed scripts and choreographic scores, photographic and video documentation, performance objects and traces/remnants of live work. The inclusion of a curated exhibition to coincide with the annual TaPRA conference follows the success of last year’s Practice Gallery, curated by Nik Wakefield, for the TaPRA 2014 Conference at Royal Holloway. This year we build on this through the inclusion of over twenty practice-as-research examples from theatre and performance practitioners, exhibited through the University of Worcester’s Cotswold Gallery and Digital Arts Centre. Exhibitors include Caroline Astell-Burt, Aurelia Baumgartner, Angela Bartram, Mathilda Branson, Paul D Brownbill, Sally Doughty, Mark Edward, Mark Ellis, Rebecca Gamble, Teri Howson, Maria Kapsali, Belinda Grantham, Beatrice Jarvice, Jess McCormack, Priya Mistry, Roma Patel, Barbara Roland, Joan-Sabas Pardo, Marianne Sharp, Daniel Somerville, Tiffany Strawson and Harry Wilson. Further information and exhibition documentation can be viewed online at: https://tapraexhibition2015.wordpress.com Exhibition Opening and Drinks Reception: Tuesday 8 September, 5.15pm–6.30pm. Exhibition Opening Times: 9–10 September 9am–4pm. TaPRA 2015 Conference Programme P a g e | 3 KEYNOTE SPEAKERS Tuesday 4pm-5.15pm Yelland and Urwin Lecture Theatres, Elgar Building Theatre for Young Audiences: The Perils of Cultural Translation Manon van de Water Most of my scholarly, and practical, career of the last two decades has been devoted to exploring the interdependence of meaning and material condition; or, what happens when you translate, or transfer a cultural artifact that has been created under one set of material circumstances (social, cultural, ideological, economic, political) to another culture that functions under alternative materials circumstances. Simultaneously I have been working on bridging the gap between theatre for young audiences (TYA) and theatre for adults, particularly from a scholarly perspective. Both through education and work, I have straddled research and practice, theatre for young people and for adults, in four different countries, under four different sets of circumstances. The perils of cultural translation as well as notions of TYA as cultural production, touch upon many questions that are under researched; from challenging, or conforming to, cultural taboos, to different notions of child and childhood, to economic concerns. In this paper, I will address some of these issues, by using, among others, theories of material semiotics as outlined by Ric Knowles. Proceeding from the premise that theory and practice go hand in hand and are mutually dependent on each other, I will give examples of attempts to contextualize and foster cultural sensitivity and understanding from International TYA Festivals. Ultimately, this keynote aims to defy the notion of TYA as “less than,” or “theatre but not theatre,” by demonstrating its rich potential for researchers and practitioners alike. Biography Manon van de Water (Phd in Theatre, Arizona State University; Doctorandus in Slavic Languages and Literature, University of Leiden, The Netherlands) is the Vilas-Phipps Distinguished Achievement Professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Professor van de Water has published widely on theatre, drama education, and theatre for young audiences in national and international journals and she is the author of Moscow Theatres for Young People: A Cultural History of Ideological Coercion and Artistic Innovation, 1917-2000 (2006); Dutch Theatre for Children (2008/ 2009), and Theatre, Youth, and Culture: A Critical and Historical Exploration (2012), for which she received the 2013 American Alliance for Theatre and Education (AATE) Distinguished Book Award. She
Recommended publications
  • Annual Review 2001 Contents

    Annual Review 2001 Contents

    accounts and lottery report annual review 2001 Contents 3 Welcome 4 Arts Council of England grant-in-aid accounts 27 Grants awarded 2000/01 39 Arts Council of England lottery distribution accounts 61 National Lottery Report 2000/01 78 Advisory Panels 79 Regional Arts Boards 4 Arts Council of England grant-in-aid accounts 25 Grants awarded 1999/2000 44 Arts Council of England lottery distribution accounts 64 National Lottery Report 1999/2000 78 Advisory Panels 79 Regional Arts Boards THE ARTS COUNCIL OF ENGLAND 2 Welcome to the Arts Council of England’s Annual Review for 2001 – Accounts and Lottery Report The Arts Council is the national body for the arts in England. We distribute public money from Government and the National Lottery to artists and arts organisations, both directly and through the 10 English regional arts boards. As an independent, non-political body,working at arm’s length from Government, we champion the arts — promoting the importance of artistic endeavour to the economic, physical, social and, not least, spiritual well-being of the country.We commission research, promote innovation in the arts, and provide advice and information. Our strategic priorities are to bring the arts to a wider audience, support the individual artist, nurture creativity across the generations, embrace the diversity of our culture and explore new forms of expression. In 2000 we successfully made the case to Government for a substantial increase in public funding for the arts.This review sets out how we are using this money and our plans for ensuring that England’s artists and arts communities remain among the most dynamic, vibrant and resourceful in the world.
  • What Ever Happened to In-Yer-Face Theatre?

    What Ever Happened to In-Yer-Face Theatre?

    What Ever Happened to in-yer-face theatre? Aleks SIERZ (Theatre Critic and Visiting Research Fellow, Rose Bruford College) “I have one ambition – to write a book that will hold good for ten years afterwards.” Cyril Connolly, Enemies of Promise • Tuesday, 23 February 1999; Brixton, south London; morning. A Victorian terraced house in a road with no trees. Inside, a cloud of acrid dust rises from the ground floor. Two workmen are demolishing the wall that separates the dining room from the living room. They sweat; they curse; they sing; they laugh. The floor is covered in plaster, wooden slats, torn paper and lots of dust. Dust hangs in the air. Upstairs, Aleks is hiding from the disruption. He is sitting at his desk. His partner Lia is on a train, travelling across the city to deliver a lecture at the University of East London. Suddenly, the phone rings. It’s her. And she tells him that Sarah Kane is dead. She’s just seen the playwright’s photograph in the newspaper and read the story, straining to see over someone’s shoulder. Aleks immediately runs out, buys a newspaper, then phones playwright Mark Ravenhill, a friend of Kane’s. He gets in touch with Mel Kenyon, her agent. Yes, it’s true: Kane, who suffered from depression for much of her life, has committed suicide. She is just twenty-eight years old. Her celebrity status, her central role in the history of contemporary British theatre, is attested by the obituaries published by all the major newspapers. Aleks returns to his desk.
  • Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience H.M

    Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience H.M

    Social Studies of Science http://sss.sagepub.com/ The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience H.M. Collins and Robert Evans Social Studies of Science 2002 32: 235 DOI: 10.1177/0306312702032002003 The online version of this article can be found at: http://sss.sagepub.com/content/32/2/235 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Social Studies of Science can be found at: Email Alerts: http://sss.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://sss.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav >> Version of Record - Apr 1, 2002 What is This? Downloaded from sss.sagepub.com at UNIV OF RHODE ISLAND LIBRARY on December 9, 2013 DISCUSSION PAPER ABSTRACT Science studies has shown us why science and technology cannot always solve technical problems in the public domain. In particular, the speed of political decision-making is faster than the speed of scientific consensus formation. A predominant motif over recent years has been the need to extend the domain of technical decision-making beyond the technically qualified ´elite, so as to enhance political legitimacy. We argue, however, that the ‘Problem of Legitimacy’ has been replaced by the ‘Problem of Extension’ – that is, by a tendency to dissolve the boundary between experts and the public so that there are no longer any grounds for limiting the indefinite extension of technical decision-making rights. We argue that a Third Wave of Science Studies – Studies of Expertise and Experience (SEE) – is needed to solve the Problem of Extension.
  • 1 Ethers, Religion and Politics In

    1 Ethers, Religion and Politics In

    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE Ethers, religion and politics in late-Victorian physics: beyond the Wynne thesis AUTHORS Noakes, Richard JOURNAL History of Science DEPOSITED IN ORE 16 June 2008 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10036/30065 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication ETHERS, RELIGION AND POLITICS IN LATE-VICTORIAN PHYSICS: BEYOND THE WYNNE THESIS RICHARD NOAKES 1. INTRODUCTION In the past thirty years historians have demonstrated that the ether of physics was one of the most flexible of all concepts in the natural sciences. Cantor and Hodge’s seminal collection of essays of 1981 showed how during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries British and European natural philosophers invented a range of ethers to fulfil diverse functions from the chemical and physiological to the physical and theological.1 In religious discourse, for example, Cantor identified “animate” and spiritual ethers invented by neo-Platonists, mystics and some Anglicans to provide a mechanism for supporting their belief in Divine immanence in the cosmos; material, mechanistic and contact-action ethers which appealed to atheists and Low Churchmen because such media enabled activity in the universe without constant and direct Divine intervention; and semi-spiritual/semi-material ethers that appealed to dualists seeking a mechanism for understanding the interaction of mind and matter. 2 The third type proved especially attractive to Oliver Lodge and several other late-Victorian physicists who claimed that the extraordinary physical properties of the ether made it a possible mediator between matter and spirit, and a weapon in their fight against materialistic conceptions of the cosmos.
  • Download Report 2010-12

    Download Report 2010-12

    RESEARCH REPORt 2010—2012 MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Cover: Aurora borealis paintings by William Crowder, National Geographic (1947). The International Geophysical Year (1957–8) transformed research on the aurora, one of nature’s most elusive and intensely beautiful phenomena. Aurorae became the center of interest for the big science of powerful rockets, complex satellites and large group efforts to understand the magnetic and charged particle environment of the earth. The auroral visoplot displayed here provided guidance for recording observations in a standardized form, translating the sublime aesthetics of pictorial depictions of aurorae into the mechanical aesthetics of numbers and symbols. Most of the portait photographs were taken by Skúli Sigurdsson RESEARCH REPORT 2010—2012 MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Introduction The Max Planck Institute for the History of Science (MPIWG) is made up of three Departments, each administered by a Director, and several Independent Research Groups, each led for five years by an outstanding junior scholar. Since its foundation in 1994 the MPIWG has investigated fundamental questions of the history of knowl- edge from the Neolithic to the present. The focus has been on the history of the natu- ral sciences, but recent projects have also integrated the history of technology and the history of the human sciences into a more panoramic view of the history of knowl- edge. Of central interest is the emergence of basic categories of scientific thinking and practice as well as their transformation over time: examples include experiment, ob- servation, normalcy, space, evidence, biodiversity or force.
  • Download Publication

    Download Publication

    ARTS COUNCIL CONTENTS C hairina;,'~ Introduction 4 The Arts Council of Great Britain, as a 5 publicly accountable body, publishes an Sui kA• 1r. -C;eneral's Preface 8 Annual Report to provide Parliament and Departmental Report s 14 the general public with an overview of th e Scotland year's work and to record ail grants an d Wales 15 guarantees offered in support of the arts . Council 16 Membership of Council and Staff 17 A description of the highlights of th e Advisory Panels and Committee s 18 Council's work and discussion of its policie s Staff 23 appear in the newspaper Arts in Action Annual Accounts 25 which is published in conjunction with thi s Funds, Exhibitions, SchewsandAuvrd~ Report and can be obtained, free of charge , from the Arts Council Shop, 8 Long Acre , London WC2 and arts outlets throughou t the country . The objects for which the Arts Council of Great Britain is established are : I To develop and improve the knowledge , understanding and practice of the arts ; 2 To increase the accessibility of the arts to the public throughout Great Britain ; 3 To co-operate with governmen t departments, local authorities and othe r bodies to achieve these objects. CHAIRMAN'S INTRODUCTION and performing artists and of helping t o wherever possible both Mth local build up the audiences which must be th e authorities and with private sponsors. real support for the arts . It is the actua l event, the coming together of artist an d The Arts Council is very conscious that th e audience, which matters .
  • An Investigation Into How Engagement with the Context and Processes of Collaborative Devising Affects the Praxis of the Playwright

    An Investigation Into How Engagement with the Context and Processes of Collaborative Devising Affects the Praxis of the Playwright

    An Investigation into How Engagement with the Context and Processes of Collaborative Devising Affects the Praxis of the Playwright: A Practice-as-Research PhD Volume 2 223 Practice-As-Research: The 9.21 to Shrub Hill (Devised Production) Playground (Non-Devised Production) and Accompanying Exegesis 224 Chapter Five Exegesis of the Processes of Creating a Devised Script (The 9.21 to Shrub Hill) and Non-Devised Script (Playground) Introduction The preceding chapters have created a framework for the analysis of my own experiences as a writer-deviser. Without this framework, it would be difficult to situate my practice within a theoretical context, since a similar academic discourse, placing the writer-deviser at the heart of the study, does not exist. As highlighted in the Introduction, the central query of this dissertation is how engagement with devising affects a playwright. This is a query with important ramifications for pedagogical practice and the discourses of devising and playwriting in general, but also represents a significant investigation in the development of my own artistic practice. As previously discussed, my methodological approach encompasses both research-led practice, and practice-led research.1 The preceding chapters have informed the development of the two scripts contained within this volume, and the development of the two scripts directed the focus of my research. As with most PaR investigations, the findings resulting from the practice share equal weighting (if not, in the case of some researchers, more) with those discoveries made from traditional, text-based research methodologies. Whilst I explore the ramifications of devising practice on my writing, I am also placing it within the context of the previous chapters’ revelations, finding resonances with the work of other writer-devisers, and testing out the theories presented of both devising and writing in my own work.
  • Tom Stoppard

    Tom Stoppard

    Tom Stoppard: An Inventory of His Papers at the Harry Ransom Center Descriptive Summary Creator: Stoppard, Tom Title: Tom Stoppard Papers Dates: 1939-2000 (bulk 1970-2000) Extent: 149 document cases, 9 oversize boxes, 9 oversize folders, 10 galley folders (62 linear feet) Abstract: The papers of this British playwright consist of typescript and handwritten drafts, revision pages, outlines, and notes; production material, including cast lists, set drawings, schedules, and photographs; theatre programs; posters; advertisements; clippings; page and galley proofs; dust jackets; correspondence; legal documents and financial papers, including passports, contracts, and royalty and account statements; itineraries; appointment books and diary sheets; photographs; sheet music; sound recordings; a scrapbook; artwork; minutes of meetings; and publications. Call Number: Manuscript Collection MS-4062 Language English. Arrangement Due to size, this inventory has been divided into two separate units which can be accessed by clicking on the highlighted text below: Tom Stoppard Papers--Series descriptions and Series I. through Series II. [Part I] Tom Stoppard Papers--Series III. through Series V. and Indices [Part II] [This page] Stoppard, Tom Manuscript Collection MS-4062 Series III. Correspondence, 1954-2000, nd 19 boxes Subseries A: General Correspondence, 1954-2000, nd By Date 1968-2000, nd Container 124.1-5 1994, nd Container 66.7 "Miscellaneous," Aug. 1992-Nov. 1993 Container 53.4 Copies of outgoing letters, 1989-91 Container 125.3 Copies of outgoing
  • Welcome – Secondary English

    Welcome – Secondary English

    Welcome – Secondary English Welcome to the National Theatre Collection. Here you can find the best of British theatre available for you and your students to watch whenever you’d like. Our unique collection presents high-quality recordings of 30 world-class productions, giving you the best seats in the house from the comfort of your classroom. The collection enables students to see and understand text in performance and understand how a play can be interpreted in different ways. You’ll find an incredible selection of productions, with something suitable for all students from Key Stage 3 through to Key Stage 5. Many of the productions featured as part of the Collection are GCSE and A-Level set texts for English. We hope that you might also use the Collection to introduce your students to plays that you might not have thought of exploring before, expanding their theatrical language and literacy. Key Stage 3 and above • Introduce students to the Windrush generation and their experiences in post-war • Introduce Shakespeare with productions Britain in Small Island, Helen Edmundson’s of Romeo and Juliet and The Winter’s adaptation of Andrea Levy’s novel. Tale, specially adapted for younger audiences. These productions use Shakespeare’s original text, but are only Key Stage 5 an hour long so are very accessible for younger students. • Explore A-Level set text Shakespeare plays in full, looking at the director’s interpretation • Explore a novel brought to life on stage and how this is realised on stage. You with Bryony Lavery’s adaptation of watch and analyse productions of Othello, Treasure Island.
  • Madness, Resistance, and Representation in Contemporary British and Irish Theatre

    Madness, Resistance, and Representation in Contemporary British and Irish Theatre

    Madness, Resistance, and Representation in Contemporary British and Irish Theatre Submitted by Jonathan Edward Venn to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Drama, October 2016 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. (Signature) . 1 Mum. Dad. Lizzie. It runs in the family. 2 ABSTRACT This thesis questions how theatre can act as a site of resistance against the political structures of madness. It analyzes a variety of plays from the past 25 years of British and Irish theatre in order to discern what modes of resistance are possible, and the conceptual lines upon which they follow. It questions how these modes of resistance are imbibed in the representation of madness. It discerns what way these modes relate specifically to the theatrical, and what it is the theatrical specifically has to offer these conceptualizations. It achieves this through a close textual and performative analysis of the selected plays, interrogating these plays from various theoretical perspectives. It follows and explores different conceptualizations across both political and ethical lay lines, looking at what composes the theatrical practical critique, how theatre can alter and play with space, how theatre capacitate the act of witnessing, and the possibility of re-invigorating the ethical encounter through theatrical means.
  • STRIFE of BRIAN Science and Reflexive Reason As a Public Project

    STRIFE of BRIAN Science and Reflexive Reason As a Public Project

    STRIFE OF BRIAN Science and Reflexive Reason as a Public Project. An interview with Brian Wynne by Marie Antonsen & Rita Elmkvist Nilsen We met Brian Wynne in late April 2013. The place was Hell, Norway, which is nicer than it sounds, especially if you are attending the first Nordic STS Conference. We had recently established NJSTS, and when we heard that Brian Wynne was giving a keynote lecture at the conference, we took the opportunity to interview a pioneer in the field about the so-called political turn in STS. The topics of Wynne`s work ranges from technology and risk assessment, public risk perceptions, and public understanding of science, focusing on the relations between expert and lay knowledge and policy decision-making. He has promoted STS and its democratizing potential since the very beginning, and has never been known to shy away from the more controversial aspects of public understanding and engagement in science. Neither did he in this interview: It seems despite his strifes, he is still going with a strong programme. Professor Wynne has addended the interview with some clarifications and references. Keywords: Interview, expertise, democracy, science studies Corresponding author: Marie Antonsen Department of Interdisciplinary Studies of Culture, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU). 7491 Trondheim, Norway. Email: [email protected] Licensing: All content in NJSTS is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 license. This means that anyone is free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) or adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the material as they like, provided they follow two provisions: a) attribution - give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
  • Networks of Expertise and Evidence for Public Policy Annual Report 2015 the Centre for Science and Policy in 2015

    Networks of Expertise and Evidence for Public Policy Annual Report 2015 the Centre for Science and Policy in 2015

    Networks of Expertise and Evidence for Public Policy Annual Report 2015 The Centre for Science and Policy in 2015 The policy challenges facing our world today demand ever-greater foresight, ingenuity and a willingness to collaborate across sectors. As this report illustrates, “Over the seven years since its launch, the Centre for Science the Centre for Science and Policy has been helping its network to navigate and Policy has pioneered new ways of bringing academia and challenges from climate resilience to new forms of healthcare; from national government together to tackle policy challenges. CSaP has security to shaping innovation in the public interest. successfully promoted long-term thinking and more robust networks of expertise and evidence for public policy. The maturity of CSaP’s unique network of academics As he moves on to chair CSaP’s Advisory Council, I and policy makers is demonstrated by the breadth would like to express my gratitude to David for his Dr Robert Doubleday and depth of our work during 2015. Our network inspirational work in founding the Centre. Executive Director Centre for Science and Policy 2015 is the year in which the Centre came of age. Having now encompasses over 200 Fellows and more than served as its founding director from 2009 to 2015, I am 1100 researchers and, during the year, we welcomed In 2016, a year set to be every bit as challenging for delighted CSaP is playing a central role in supporting the more than 2500 participants to 43 events. governments as 2015 has been, CSaP’s role in brokering links between research and policy will be University’s mission, and that the Centre is in the excellent These achievements are testimony to the vision of more important than ever.