Document of The World Bank
ReportNo: 18359-IND Public Disclosure Authorized
PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT
Public Disclosure Authorized ONA
PROPOSED CREDIT
IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR73.5 MILLION
(US$100 MILLION EQUIVALENT)
TO THE
REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA Public Disclosure Authorized FOR AN
URBAN POVERTY PROJECT
April 19, 1999 Public Disclosure Authorized
Urban Development Sector Unit Indonesia Country Department East Asia and Pacific Region i
CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS
Exchange Rate Designated for Negotiations, October 22, 1998
Currency Unit = Indonesian Rupiah (Rp) Indonesian Rupiah = US$0.0001 US$1 = 7,500 Indonesian Rupiah SDRI = 1.3546 US$ (end March 1999)
FISCAL YEAR OF BORROWER APRIL 1-MARCH 31
ACRONYMS
ADB Asian Development Bank AMDAL Environmental Impact Assessment ANDAL Environmental Impact Statement APBD Annual district development budget APEF Annual Project Expenditures and Financing APBN Annual central government development budget Bappenas National Development Planning Agency Bappeda I/II Provincial/district Planning Agency BANGDA Directorate General for Regional Development, MoHA BKKBN National Family Planning Board BPKP Central Audit Bureau BPS National Statistics Bureau BRI Bank Rakyat Indonesia Bupati/Walikota District/city head CPEF Cumulative Project Expenditures and Financing DPUK Kabupaten Department of Public Works CAS Country Assistance Strategy GOI Govemment of Indonesia INPRES Presidential Instruction (a central block grant) IMF International Monetary Fund Kabupaten/kotamadya District/municipality KDP Kecamatan Development Project Kecamatan Subdistrict Kelurahan/lurah Urban section comprising on average 10 RWs/ head of kelurahan LKMD Village/kelurahan management group KPKN Local Office of National Treasury LIL Learning and Innovation Loan MoF Ministry of Finance MoHA Ministry of Home Affairs MPW Ministry of Public Works NGO Non-governmental organization (same as LSM) OC Oversight consultant PDM-DKE Crisis related social safety program PHRD Japanese Grant PMD Directorate General of Community Development, MoHA PMU Project Management Unit Pimpro/PjOK Project Administrative Manager (pimpinan proyek) RKL/RPL Environmental Management/ Monitoring Plan RW Neighborhood with some 500 Families (rukun warga) SAL Structural Adjustment Loan SPAPB Grants from central to local governments SUSENAS National Household Expenditure Survey UKL/UPL Environmental Management / Monitoring Procedures VIP Village Infrastructure Project
Vice President: Jean-Michel Severino Country Director: Mark Baird Sector Manager: Keshav Varna Task Manager: Frida Johansen Indonesia:Urban Poverty Project PAD Page ii
INDONESIA URBAN POVERTY PROJECT
CONTENTS
A. Project Development Objective 1. Project development objectives and key performance indicators ...... 2
B. Strategic Context 1. Sector-relatedCAS goal supported by the project ...... 2 2. Main sector issues and Government strategy ...... 2 3. Sector issues to be addressed by the project and strategic choices...... 4
C. Project Description Summary 1. Project component...... S5 2. Key policy and institutionalreforms supported by the project...... 6 3. Institutional and implementationarrangements ...... 6 4. Benefits and target population...... 7
D. Project Rationale 1. Project alternatives considered and reasons for rejection...... 8 2. Major related projects financed by the Bank and/or other development agencies...... 8 3. Lessons learned and reflected in proposed project design...... 9 4. Indications of Borrower commitment and ownership...... 9 5. Value added of Bank support in this project...... 9
E. Summary Project Analyses 1. Economic...... 9 2 Financial...... 10 3. Technical...... 10 4. Institutional...... 11 5. Social...... 11 6. Environmentalassessment ...... 11 7. Participatory approach...... 11
F. Sustainabilityand Risks 1. Sustainability...... 12 2. Critical risks...... 12 3. Possible controversial aspects...... 12
G. Main Credit Conditions 1. Effectiveness conditions...... 13 2. Other...... 13
H. Readinessfor Implementation...... 13
I. Compliancewith Bank Policies...... 13
Annexes iii
Annex 1 Project Design Summary...... 15 Key PerformanceIndicators ...... 16 Annex 2 Project Description.17 Annex 3 Estimated Project Costs...... 34 Annex 4 Economic Analysis (n.a.)...... 34 Annex 5 Financial Summary ...... 34 Annex 6 Procurement, Disbursementand Auditing Arrangements...... 35 Al Project Costs by ProcurementArrangements ...... 40 A2 Consultant Selection Arrangements...... 40 B Thresholds for Procurement Methods and Prior Review...... 41 C Allocation of Credit Proceeds...... 41 Annex 7 Project Processing Budget and Schedule...... 42 Annex 8 Documents in the Project File...... 43 Annex 9 Status of Bank Group Operations in Indonesia...... 44 Annex 10 Country at a Glance...... 46 Annex 11 Project ImplementationPlan ...... 47 Annex 12 UPP Implementation Agreement Formats...... 51 Annex 13 Land Acquisitionand Resettlement Guidelines...... 61 Annex 14 Environmental Guidelines...... 62
Map No. 29868 INDONESIA URBAN POVERTYPROJECT
Project Appraisal Document
East Asia and Pacific Region Indonesia CountryDepartment
Date: April 19,1999 Task Manager: Frida Johansen Country Director: Mark Baird SectorManager: Keshav Varma Project ID: ID-PE-55821 Sector: Urban Program Objective Category: Poverty Reduction Lending Instrument: SIC Program of Targeted Intervention: [X] Yes [1 No
Project FinancingData [] Loan [x] Credit [] Guarantee [] Other [Specify]
For Credit:
Amount (SDRm): 73.5 Proposed terms: [] Multicurrency [] Single currency Grace period (years): 10 [] Standard Variable [ ] Fixed [] LIBOR-based Years to maturity: 35 Commitmentcharge: 0.5%
Financing plan (US$m equivalent): Source Local Foreign Total Government 14.2 14.2 IDA 76.2 23.8 100.0 IBRD 13.5 2.0 15.5 Total 103.9 25.8 129.7
Borrower: Republic of Indonesia Guarantor:n.a. Responsible agency(ies): Bappenas
Estimated disbursements (IDA FY/US$M): 2000 2001 2002 2003 1/ Annual 36.5 36.5 21.5 5.5 Cumulative 36.5 73.0 94.5 100
1/ for final disbursementsafter official closing date
For Guarantees: [] Partial credit [] Partial risk n.a.
Project implementationperiod: FY99-FY03 Expected effectivenessdate: 07/08/99 Expected closing date: 6/30/02
OSD PAD Form: July 30, 1997 Indonesia:Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 2
A: Project Development Objective 1. Project development objective and key performance indicators (see Annex 1): Through a bottom up and transparent approach, the project seeks to improve basic infrastructure in poor urban neighborhoods and to promote sustainable income generation for its poor urban residents who are mostly long term poor, have incomes eroded by high inflation, or lost sources of income in the economic downturn. Also, the project seeks to strengthen the capability of local agencies to assist poor communities.
B: Strategic Context 1. Sector-related Country Assistance Strategy (CAS) goal supported by the project (see Annex 1): CAS document number: 18963-IND Date of latest CAS (progress report) discussion: March 9, 1999
The latest CAS, dated July 1997, did not foresee a crisis. The July 1998 "Indonesia in Crisis: A Macroeconomic Update", summarizes the Bank recommendations to GOI, and was the basis for a Consultative Group Meeting, for a $1 billion Policy Reform SAL approved July 1998, and for a project portfolio review in August 1998 that identified Bank loan partial cancellations totaling $1 billion. The Bank supported the creation of an NGO structure to channel funds (expected to be mostly bilateral grants) toNGOs and communityprojects. New Bank loans, mostly to support the balance of payments, are under preparation. A CAS Progress Report was issued February 16, 1999. Indonesia has again become eligible for an IDA allocation; SDR100 million were approved March 9, 1999, for a "base case" scenario, and less, for a "low case" scenario.
The Bank took some actions to alleviate the domestic economic slump through existing projects. The Village Infrastructure Project coverage was doubled to 3,000 villages on Java and Sumatra in 1998/9 (taking over an intended government share) and will assist a further 2,500 villages in 1999/0, a third project year made possible with the loan by the rupiah depreciation. The Kecamatan (subdistrict) Development Project, approved in June 1998, widens the VIP menu to include economic activities; it started assisting 500 rural kecamatans in 1998/9, double the number at appraisal, and many in Eastern Indonesia, and is to expand to 750 kecamatans in 1999/0. Under road projects some disbursement rates were increased and more funds directed to maintenance. Urban projects were amended to provide for labor intensive works with 100% loan financing (implementation started in June 1998 and ended December 1998). Some education and health projects were restructured to ease affordability of services by the poor. New Bank initiatives include 2 basic education projects, that have been negotiated.
This project was proposed early 1998, obtained a $750,000 PHRD grant July 1998 to assist preparation; was negotiated October 1998 for a loan, was then delayed awaiting a Bank decision on the Governmentrequest for IDA financing, and when this was approved, supplementary negotiations were held on April 9, 1999 on a credit agreement. The CAS objectives of poverty reduction, decentralization and participatory project identification and implementation,continue and apply to this project. 2. Main poverty issues and Government strategy: Even while incomes had been increasing steadily for years, a large proportion of the population remained just above the absolute poverty line. The pre-crisis number of "absolute" poor was estimated at 7 million in urban areas, at a 10% incidence (and 15 million in rural areas, at 12%). Unemployment was estimated to be very low, less than 2%--though substantial underemploymentwas acknowledged (some 35%). Since the banking collapse in mid-1997, most enterprises cannot obtain or afford credit for working capital. This has led to the vicious circle of layoffs and loss of purchasing power and of demand by employees/consumers, enterprises and self employed service providers. The 1997 foreign exchange crisis worsened the problem--except for those who could continue to export--and fueled inflation to annualized rates exceeding 80%: reduced nominal incomes were reduced even more in real terms. Simultaneously, early 1997 drought was widespread and in places, severe, and affected rural livelihoods. Unrest exacerbated the situation.
Estimates of the number of people affected by the depression and their location are uncertain as the situation changes. Mid-1998 urban poverty estimates started at 20%. Of a 91 million labor force, open urban Page 3 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD unemployment was estimated at 15 million (16%). The potential for underemployment was estimated at 45% by the Indonesian Federation of Workers. Especially affected were the construction and manufacturing sectors (shoes, textiles, garments, electronics). The Indonesian Association of Textile Industries estimated 15% laid off of the 2 million in the sector, mostly women; the Association of Construction Industries estimated some 3-4 million laid off, mostly men. The banking sector was hard hit. Many of the people who continued working were paid less. Jobs under public sector contracts dwindled as public funding was decreased and delayed. However, by July 1998 the drought seemed over and rural areas producing for export (rubber, palm oil, coffee, cocoa, etc.) saw greatly increased incomes due to the gradual rupiah depreciation (from some Rp2,500 per dollar mid-1997 to about Rpl5,000 mid-1998 and back to Rp8,000 since the third quarter). Many urban jobless returned to their town or village of origin, thus mitigating the urban plight.
Java is the most affected island. It has about 120 million persons or 60% of Indonesia's population, 40 million living in urban areas (65% of the urban population), most of the larger cities that are more affected, and more than 5 million "absolute" urban poor (some 70% of the total) prior to the crisis. Java's urban areas had some 8 million manufacturing jobs (73% of Indonesia's total), 2.6 million construction workers (65% of the total), equally high shares of service jobs and more than 80% of the foreign investment--most of which was lost. Java's rural areas produce mostly rice; the rice price increase lagged other prices and with an average 900 persons per km2, expanding cultivated areas is difficult. Sumatra, with some 20% of the population and almost 1 million urban poor pre-crisis, seems the second most affected island, in particular its larger cities in the provinces of Sumatra Utara and Sumatra Selatan.
The Government "crisis" strategy included assistance to the rural areas, where the cost of living is lower, and to encourage seasonal migrants who lost their urban job, to return to their villages--rural-urbanlinkages are strong in Indonesia. In particular, the Government provided some new and continued other rural programs, including Bank-assisted projects. Other donor agencies also amended their programs. The Government, mostly with IMF and adjustment lending counterpartrupiah, also undertook: a) subsidy programs for necessities in all areas--a food distribution program to provide rice, sugar and cooking oil at below-market prices; at times, food coupons for free meals; subsidized medicines; school fee waivers for poor families; b) labor intensiveprograms for small works, some of which were already in municipal plans, with Rp6 trillion budgeted for 1998/9 though not all was spent; c) a crisis alleviation program (PDM-DKE) launched in November 1998; it provides funds to all subdistrictsin proportion to the estimated number of poor and relative level of local prices. The scheme is based on the KDP model and its funds can be disbursed until June 30, 1999. The Government allocation for "social programs" was large--totaling some Rpl8 trillion ($2.2 billion equivalent) for the fiscal year ending March 1999. Local govermmentsalso implement their own programs; some of them promote food production on idle urban land. A district level Coordination Committee for social programs was started late 1998 with participation of all local agencies, in order to improve effectiveness of the programs.
For 1999/0 the Government objective is to increase "recovery" programs, reduce unsustainable "welfare" programs and improve those retained. The total needed for social support should not exceed RplO trillion even allowing for imperfect targeting and overheads; some of this is already funded. Unnecessary area overlaps of programs would be avoided. The PDM-DKE implementation would be improved, partly by preparing staff better. Ad-hoc labor intensive schemes are no longer planned; they were not very efficient nor effective, and anyway contractors are switching to higher labor intensity because of the new relative prices (many have exported their equipment). But public sector job generation remains jeopardized: the Government's December 1998 draft budget was only some 50% in real terms of the 1998/9 budget, with even greater decreases in the routine and the "projects" budgets that are the more labor intensive (a small counterpart funding for projects has multiplier effects as it can trigger release of a 4-5-fold foreign funded portion; this multiplier effect, and related jobs, was mostly lost in 1998/9). "Programs" kept its allocation (in nominal terms), seem to crowd out projects and probably absorb the foreign adjustment loans. Foreign funding assumed in the draft budget was almost 30% (Rp77 trillion, or some $10 billion--1999/0 budget in Rp trillion: 218 total, 134 routine, 83 development, of which 30 "projects" and 53 "program", and this including 21.7 for "bank restructuring"). Actual 1998/9 expenditures were much lower than Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 4
the budget. The new budget was still under discussion in February. Parliamentary elections are scheduled for June 1999 and subsequentbudget changes can be expected. 3. Sector issues to be addressed by the project and strategic choices: As poverty reduction is not a "sector", issues in social sectors such as education, health, trade, and public transport are not addressed by this project. Indonesia's vast archipelago with some 60 million persons in urban areas and some 12 million urban poor and newly impoverished, make it difficult to address "all" urban poverty. The project design (details in Annex 2) makes the following strategic choices:
Geographical coverage: The proposed project will assist the neediest urban areas on Java. In 1999/0 the PDM-DKE is to assist other urban areas (and rural subdistricts not covered by the KDP, VIP and a OECF "VIP"). Thus the 4 projects are complementary even if only the PDM-DKE is crisis related, and thus is simpler (with less facilitation), provides less funding "per capita" and admits to lower sustainability expectations. The BPS definitions of "urban" and "rural" are used in the 4 projects. Funds will thus be available in all urban areas not to distort location choices of the unemployed and needy. Other complementary programs, such as food and scholarshipprograms, will continue. The UPP more complex logistics and facilitator deployment for establishing a more sustainable program for the "structuralpoor", require starting in a limited area; its grass roots approach would be gradually expanded to other areas and phase out "crisis" programs. Thus, the project will begin in dense urban corridors, in 59 districts in the northern half of Java and in Yogyakarta, Bandung and Malang. They comprise some 30 million urban residents in a small area. Within this area, facilitators will start in the 1305 larger kelurahans (of more than 7500 persons) totaling 23 million, to reach the most poor (Phase 1). A Phase 2 would start some 3 months later under the project, expanding on Java, into the 1540 smallerkelurahans with 7 million, in the same northern districts, and/or into the "southern" districts including 1360 urban areas, mostly small, totaling 8 million persons (page 25). If the approach is successful, another project/funding source would then be found to spread it. To help target locations local governments ranked kelurahans, and within the selected kelurahans, they will rank neighborhoods,according to poverty level. Data collected by the family planning groups (BKKBN) can help identify poor households (SUSENAS, the household expenditure survey, data allow to pinpoint the poorer districts, but not poorer subdistricts or smaller areas. There is not a good, up to date standard database at national level, to identify poor urban neighborhoods,but this should not be necessary with decentralization).
Targetgroup: Oversight consultants will verify the poverty levels in neighborhoods before facilitators start distributing in them a circular with information on the program. Eligibility of households submitting proposals for funding will also be verified by facilitators to reduce the potential for capture byelites. Incomes of a family of 4 should be less than about Rp250,000 per month, and whether the household head/spouse is working, the house is rented, and the quality of the house, will also be considered; however, one third of the group members may be better off, to facilitate self-help within the community. It is likely that the long term poor or near poor will participate the most in the program with this selection process. The relatively better off among the poor may qualify more easily to access funds that have to revolve. Still, their activities usually involve hiring unskilled workers. Factory workers laid-off would be mostly interested in getting their jobs back, and may participate more in temporary public works. The project aims at reaching the poorest 25% of the populations in the selected areas. . Other social programs are expected to continue prior to and in parallel to this project to reach other groups.
Funding allocations: The funds will be a one time grant to kelurahans. The grants vary with population: Rpl,250 million (more than 30,000persons), Rp750 million (between 30,000 and 22,500 residents), Rp500 million (22,500 to 15,000), Rp250 million (15,000 to 7,500) and RplOOmillion (less than 7,500). Thus a similar average per capita is provided, starting at some Rp22,000 in the smaller kelurahans and reaching about Rp29,000 in the larger ones, taking into account that prices are higher in the larger kelurahans. Poverty incidences are assumed to be similar. An RW can draw up to Rp 100 million. The kelurahan grant is not an entitlement; balances uncommitted 6 months after the project start in a kelurahan, will be transferred elsewhere.
Uses of grants: Funds can be used over up to 18 months, for subloans, microcredits and infrastructure grants, by demand by community groups. a) The menu is open except for a negative list (arms, harmful drugs, depositing project funds in banks to earn interest, land acquisition,religious buildings, government administration, Page 5 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD
and environmentally harmful products). During the training of facilitators, and when these speak with the communities, some activities will be encouraged, such as urban agriculture, group training in the kampung, apprenticeships or skills training, programs for children/youth, family planning education, community based housing. New street shops will be discouraged. The ceiling for subloans is Rp3Omillion, for any proposal by groups for economic activities; loans have to be repaid within a year, with a commercial interest rate. Groups should have at least 3 members (different households)--a minimum group size that is small, reduces transaction costs. b) Maxima increasing with kelurahan size are allowed for a revolving fund for microcredits, for individuals and groups. c) Small public infrastructures in the neighborhoods will pay labor for output, at rates equivalent to minimum wages.
Timing: By financing demand-driven subprojects, the need for time consuming project preparation by a government agency is reduced; a large coverage is possible while maintaining a small and flexible scope at each location; subprojects would suit local needs better. However, initial preparation for this type of project takes some time for organization, logistics and set up (schedule in Annex 11). Disbursements for subprojects would start in July 1999.
Credit size: The credit size is determined by IDA availability, SDR73.5 million. $15.5 m have been reallocated to the UPP from uncommitted funds under the Surabaya Urban Development Project (SUDP, Loan No. 3726-IND)in order to start the UPP before credit proceeds are available. Even so, Bank funding is insufficient for all kelurahans. In a year, whether further funding is justified will be clearer.
Complementaryprograms: No amount of assistance targeted to the poor will revive the economy nor prevent some people requiring welfare. A multiprong approach can protect employment and not only help the unemployed in urban areas: a) assistance to Small and Medium Size Enterprises. SMEs are normally the largest employers but they became financially strapped and laid off workers. Many have closed, unable to adjust to inflation at 80% annualized rates, commercial interest rates at 40% (even 70% in 1998), and to buy inputs (normally in cash). The Government provides subsidized credit for SMEs; the program efficiency could be improved. However, financing is not the only constraint-demand is low; the 300% rupiah devaluation provides short term import substitution and export opportunities. b) protection of public work expenditures. Public work contractors are mostly idle--economicallyjustified public works are normally required to help end depressions. Public works budgets could be increased and be released on time to provide more continuous employment. c) Training programs could enhance skills of the unemployed and increase productivity when economic activity picks up.
C: Project Description Summary 1. Project components(see Annex 2 for a detailed description and Annex 3for a detailed cost breakdown):
Component Category Indicative % of Total IDA Ln. 3726- % IDA/ Costs US$M financing IND IBRD US$M1/ US$M financing Grants for subprojects Physical investments! Revolving credits! ) 109.4 84% 98.5 90% Group assistants TA for implementation Project management 1.0 12% 1.0 100% Oversight consultants 4.5 4.5 100% Kelurahan facilitators 10.0 10.0 100% TA for monitoring Consultants 1.5 1% 1.5 100% GOI administration Project management 3.3 3% Total 129.7 100% 100.0 15.5 1-The Credit is SDR73.5 m; dollar equivalents are shown. Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 6
2. Key policy and institutional reforms to be sought: After an initial period of centralized organization, needed for a widespread start, the communitydecides on spending priorities in a Kelurahan Forum (KF), larger than the current LKMD. Groups with approved subprojects select their own facilitators or technical experts and may pay them from theirkelurahan grant funding or by sharing expected profits. The project thus proposes to mobilize informal and private sector local institutions and expertise to assist. Payments will be according to certified output, from a commercial bank account. Interest accrued on revolving funds should be allocated for maintenance of local infrastructure,forkelurahan administration, including annual audits to be initiated by the KF, and for other local priorities. The activities should result in sustainable kelurahan investments, a Kelurahan Fund, and empowerment for broader participation in decision making about community matters. Women and men should have equal opportunity. The project thus also supports the shift to elected lurahs during 1999, required by the new law on local government, and the working of the new Coordination Committee for Social Programs at district level, that has to appointsubdistrict project managers. The project may encourage civic groups to engage in the Committee meetings or to form an Urban Community Forum, at district or subdistrict level.
Government offices will be involved for public administration and community support, rather than in their traditional top-down role. Local agency staff will be trained and invited to assist communities alongside private sector facilitators. It is hoped that as with the VIP in rural areas, this participatory system will meet small local needs better, mobilize local private resources and manpower, lower unit costs, and accelerate implementation, more than a more hierarchical approach better suited to large investments. However, it is acknowledged that the community-based approach has risks, due to less social cohesion in urban areas and the potential for the more educated to capture the funds, though transparency may be better in denser areas. Progress will be monitored closely. If successful, future similar programs may be managed at district level.
The project does not include policy studies, because many are already included under other programs. 3. Institutional and implementation arrangements: Overall coordination, management, budgeting and monitoring responsibilities are with a Secretariat in Bappenas (an expanded VIP/KDP/UPPSecretariat), under the Regional Development Deputy. An interministerial coordination committee, chaired by Bappenas, is to resolve coordination problems. This set-up parallels that for VIP, that has worked well.
District agencies will select an administrative project manager (PjOK) for appointment by theBupati or Walikota for at least 24 months. The PjOK will be located at subdistrict level (kecamatan)to verify procedures and endorse payments from the grant. For infrastructure proposals, the Public Works Department of the Kabupaten (DPUK) would be consulted to ensure correct standards and fit with municipal plans. The same agencies have prioritized kelurahans and RWs, the poverty level to be verified by the oversight consultant and the lurahs. Selected agency staff will be trained along the consultant facilitators.
Disbursementsfor grants and subloans to groups will be made by the local BRI Unit, with presentation of the Implementation Agreement (Annexl2) or claims, signed by the representatives of the group and thePjOK, attaching the approved proposal signed by the consultant, the Kelurahan Forum leader and the lurah. Bank Indonesia shall have a Special Account (SA); the regional treasury offices (KPKNs) will authorize transfers from the SA and GOI funds to designated kelurahan accounts, to be released in 3 tranches of the kelurahan grant: 40% (with the first 5 implementation agreements),40% and 20% (see Annex 6).
Monitoring will be carried out beyond that by the Secretariat and the Bank. The project provides for monitoring under provincial or district level contracts, to make each task more manageable, in terms of progress, transparency, profiles of laborers and beneficiaries, beneficiary satisfaction, etc. Local governments and journalists are invited to visit the sites and publish their findings. Complaints and suggestions can be logged at akelurahan box, and at the Secretariat's P.O. Box 2222, Jakarta (P.O. Box 5000 is widely used for another poverty project) and e-mail, [email protected]. The Annex 2 will be widely distributed (in Indonesian) and posted on the Web Page 7 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD with progress reports (in Indonesian and English).
Audits will be conducted annually by the various government level audit agencies. They are expected to coordinate their sampling to avoid a kelurahan or RW being audited more than once in a year. KFs are expected to select private sector auditors located outside the kelurahan to have their accounts audited every year. Several levels of technical assistance for implementationare anticipated: a) national project management. A Bappenas Secretariat will be strengthenedby a small consultant team to assist with project management, organization, monitoring, reporting, procurement, and training of oversight consultants,kelurahan facilitators and selected local agency staff. b) district/provincialoversight consultants. Nine firms (associations of firms) were selected and contracted for 2 years, 2 firms for each of Jakarta, West, Center and East Java, and one for Yogyakarta, to establish consultant teams and subteams in various municipalities, to provide reasonable access from most urban areas. The oversight consultants are to approve, and help design if necessary, the proposals made by groups, and supervise progress to certify payment requests. Later on, the districts would procure oversight consultants as needed. c) facilitators. i) Kelurahanfacilitators: The oversight consultant firms also provide kelurahan facilitators for 24 months, at least one per kelurahan exceeding 7,500 residents, to help disseminate the program details, assist with subproject preparation and supervise implementation.Facilitators can come from localNGOs, universities or firms, subcontractedby or in association with the OC firm. ii) Group technical assistants: Groups can agree with local consultants on help to prepare or implement subprojects, and on payment, as may be needed. iii) Community traineefacilitators: will be selected from local volunteers and be paid by the oversight consultant for 6 months after which they may be retained by the KF. d) monitoring consultants will also be provided; some may be contracted at district level.
4. Benefits and target population: The target population are the poor and newly impoverished people in urban areas on Java. The bottom 30% comprises some 12 million persons, some 3 million households. As the number of poor has increased more than proportionally on Java, this may comprise more than 75% of the target group in Indonesia overall. No city targeting is proposed because populations are mobile: assisting only large cities, where most jobs were lost, could encourage people to remain even if they have alternatives elsewhere. However, within urban areas it is foreseento assist only the poorest neighborhoods, normally in the fringes and in old cores. There the project would rely on self-targeting mechanisms and community group review and selection (e.g. by setting wages at the local minimum for public works, and payment per output not per input; and restricting credit eligibility only to households with incomes of less than about Rp250,000 per month (for 4 members). Hopefully many of the poor households could benefit from the project already the first year--communitieshaving learned the process and having had more time to generate ideas, the number of participants could increase the second year. By revolving the funds, the number of beneficiaries can continue to increase. The project coverage would be reduced should the rupiah strengthen.
Project benefits (see also Section E) would be:
a) creation of temporary jobs and small public works; local improvements tend to have high economic returns; b) benefits from economic activities, such as agricultural production on idle urban land, mainly for local consumption; creation of hopefully, lasting small businesses, of skills through training and apprenticeships. Economic activities by the poor have normally good returns, though the market conditions are difficult. Increased agroprocessingbusinesses could also promote urban-rural linkages; c) establishment of revolvingfunds, including microcredit funds, to benefit more participants in the future; such funds have shown high repayment rates. All repayments will belong to the kelurahan, that will thus have an interest in enforcingrepayment and in selecting subprojectswith public benefits; d) promotion of long term decentralization and community empowerment objectives, that could have multiplier effects. Funds should be available in a kelurahan account for further use with the project principles including Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 8
for maintenance of local infrastructures, local administration and other priorities currentlyunfunded. Local agencies will be more involved. The project, if successful, would have a demonstration effect. D: Project Rationale 1. Project alternatives considered and reasonsfor rejection: The project relies on the poor communities to select and implement subprojects, to maximize the likelihood of funds getting directly to the needy and to the more useful subprojects, of achieving low unit costs, and of fast implementation. Facilitators will assist in targeting and in the project process.
The alternative approaches considered for this project and rejected are a) a standard investmentproject. This process through public agencies is slow and hardly reaches the individuals in the communities who need direct assistance. Furthermore, agencies' staff has full agendas and could not undertake such an extra effort without consultants. Overheads also tend to be higher than with a community participation system. b) a public worksprogram. There are labor intensive public work programs, that have not proved very efficient or effective. Groups reached are not the poorest, quality is generally poor, only a small proportion of the cost goes for labor, and leakages are a concern. Food for work is rather inefficient, and was not considered. c) a "negative tax", that is, distributing cash or vouchers for food purchases to the most needy. This could be an attractive option, but the Bank normally does not finance "consumption". A food stamp program, programs for low priced necessities and waived school fees for poor families already reduce the daily need for cash.
Alternative geographical coverages were also considered. Only large cities for instance, would be inappropriate because labor and even more the newly unemployed are mobile and likely to move to where the cost of living and prospects for work are best. Thus public programs should be available in any area as much as where most jobs were lost. All of Indonesia in one project was considered too ambitious; Java was selected due to its concentration of poor. Even so logistics are considerable; a staged start was preferable--and mandated by financial constraints.
2. Major relatedprojects financed by the Bank and/or other development agencies (completed, ongoing and planned): This project fits with a number of activities under ongoing urban projects such as KIP (urban neighborhood improvement programs). The VIPs have been successful in rural areas of Java, and include the community approach. Many potential activities involving communities have been identified and could be pursued under the proposed project with minimum delay (from the Municipal Innovations Project (approved in February 1999), the proposed West Java and Jakarta Environmental Project, the NGO network to channel social funds, and USAID's ongoing CLEAN). The environmental and resettlement guidelines for the project are the same as for the Municipal Innovations Project; this facilitates administration and general understanding. Latest StatusReport Ratings (Bank-financedprojects only) Project _ Implementation Development Progress(IP) Objective(DO) Bank-financed Communityplanning and implementation VIPs HS/S HS/S KIP UDPs HS/S New approachesin cities MunicipalInnovations LIL To start Otherdevelopment agencies ADB, AusAid,GTZ, IFAD, SwissAid, USAID:decentralization, etc. IP/DORatings: HS(Highly Satisfactory), S (Satisfactory),U (Unsatisfactory),HU (HighlyUnsatisfactory) Page 9 Indonesia: Urban Poverty ProjectTPAD
3. Lessons learned and reflected in the proposedproject design: The various social funds and similar projects undertaken in the Bank were reviewed already for the KDP, and their findings taken into account. But more particularly, the vastness and social characteristics of Indonesia have been taken into account in designing the project--spatial and social structures, customs such asgotong royong (community work), informal safety nets; available skills; incentives. The government structure also has been taken into account: its hierarchy and staff availability facilitate dissemination of information, so that a "model" can easily and quickly be replicated across many cities, as was needed to govern such an extended territory. This allows a relatively large project to be implemented through small parallel, independent and varied subprojects--by establishing standard criteria, allowing demand driven solutions at each location, proceeding through relatively small assistance "units". For this to work, the basic organization needs to be relatively centralized, as does the monitoring--as was already adopted for the VIPs. 4. Indications of Borrower commitment and ownership: The Government requested assistance for the urban poor. Bappenas coordinates with other Ministries; MoHA will provide facilitators and PjOKs on a timely manner and for the duration of the project implementation in the respective kecamatans. MoF will provide the amount required for an early start before credit effectiveness. BRI will provide the payment service at its many outlets and cover its costs with the interest it may earn on temporary balances. The project's community based approach is being followedby some other programs, to lessen multiplicity of procedures and eventual inconsistencies; in particular, it is coordinated with the PDM-DKE program. 5. Value added of Bank support in this project: The main value added of the Bank is a) experience with similar approaches in rural areas, and thus prompt assistance with the project definition and in organizing the preparation activities, b) executing the PHRD grant for faster project preparation, c) low cost IDA funding (that however entailed a delay), and later d) in independent supervision and monitoring. If successful, the approach can be replicated and further Bank financing,provided. E: Summary Project Analysis 1. Economic [supported by Annex 4: n.a.] [ ] Cost benefit analysis: NPV= [x] Cost effectiveness analysis [x] Other Subproject benefits: Putting workers back to work is an objective by itself, to provide purchasing power for necessities. It is expected that most of the subprojects will be economic activities. The requirement of repayment of credits with the commercial interest rate prevailing for one year loans (some 40% in February 1999), should provide returns at least that high per year and an expected positive economic return in real terms. The project returns will be higher the faster the revolving proceeds; one year maximum is allowed but shorter cycles are common for small credits. Small business may fail, but even so repayment is expected (microcredits have some of the better repayment performances). Training should have good returns; it should enable unemployed persons to access jobs requiring more skills. The trainees are to repay to the kelurahan, the training and stipend cost. RWs with non performing groups may be ineligible for assistance the following year (this would pressure groups to repay). Urban agriculture on idle land (land is fertile on Java) should increase food or incomes. Small works or environmental improvements, greening of public spaces, etc. normally have good economic returns and their costs may be lower and quality better with the project's community approach than with the conventional contractor approach. Because of the externalities involved in public infrastructure and environmental improvements, and presumably more beneficiaries than for private economic activities, grant funding is justified. Infrastructure with poor benefits or few beneficiaries would probably not be undertaken, since the opportunity cost to thekelurahan is the return from economic activities and the potential for accessing revolving funds, or even the prospect of having the proposal rejected at the Kelurahan Forum. The "market" should work in the presence of constrained funds.
Institutional benefits: The process of community empowerment, the creation of a revolving fund and a maintenance fund from interest accruals, the acquisition of new skills, could provide the basis for some sustained improvement in poor neighborhoods. The involvement of local agency staff in new ways to assist theirkelurahan Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 10 constituencies, and eventual delegation of procuring consultants to district level, would prepare them to continue similar programs with their own resources, if this was desired and the approach is found useful and cost-effective. Paying facilitatorspartly by output rather than only by input should improve their effectiveness.Community groups will select their own consultants and payment method. Targeting efficiency. Targeting has a high cost, but it is less costly than non targeted programs in tenns of cost per poor assisted, at least at poverty rates below 50%--the "overhead" cost of non targeted programs is inversely related to the poverty rate. Increased targeting would increase the program overheads and lower the share of funds benefiting the poor (the rule applied is that if increasing targeting costs more than the "leakage" it avoids, then it is not worthwhile). Targeting the poor should be reasonably effective as self-enforcingmechanisms and incentives have been built into the program rules; however, some less poor can be asked to join groups to provide skills or other help. Only minimum wages would be paid for public works, based on output (less than minimum wages is not feasible as minimum wages are already low, eroded with inflation). Households of 4 with more than about Rp250,000 income per month would not be eligible formicrocredit (close to the poverty line, that may be adjusted for inflation year 2). The project should operate only in the poorerRWs and information would be widespread to ensure equal opportunity.
The altemative of straight welfare payments could have a lower initial cost if targeting was very good; compared to funding small public works, the cost of inputs other than labor, often more than 70%, would be avoided. But so would be the multiplier effect on the people providing the inputs, and the benefits from the infrastructure. Compared to economic activities, the "revolving"of public funds and the sense of accomplishment of the poor, would be lost with welfare payments. The program hopes to provide assistance that is sustainable, while admitting that for economic recovery and sheer welfare other programs are needed. The cost of overheads--consultants,facilitators and govemment administration--is some 17% of the project cost or 20% of the kelurahan grant cost. The overall economic return should still be good (employment of consultants and facilitators is a benefit in itself, currently). The project cost per poor person in the urban areas is about $10, or some $40 per poor household (the dollar cost depends on the rupiah exchange rate). If participation rate is a third, the cost trebles per poor beneficiary. However, as funds are to revolve or infrastructure benefits are more widespread, the fiscal cost per beneficiary will be lower. The project's overhead cost per beneficiary is comparableto that of other programs.
Detailed economic analysis is not worthwhile ex ante, as it would be no more credible than the assumptions made. The built-in incentives should help achieve good results. Close monitoring will be undertaken to evaluate results in a sample of neighborhoods 6 months after the project's effective start and monitoring will continue subsequently,to determine on a continuous basis potential improvements to the project design (or even change of approach).
2. Financial (Annex 5): n.a. NPV=n.a.; FRR=n.a. The project design is considered the best that could be identified in fiscal terms. A strongerrupiah would result in a smaller credit coverage and higher unit costs in dollars, as the kelurahan grant amounts and contracts for oversight consultants and facilitators are in rupiah. The Credit balance and commitment projections will be monitored carefullybefore expanding into a subsequent project phase.
Technical and financial audits by the monitoring consultants will be important to check the adequacy of fund use, in a more timely fashion to enable action taken where anomalies or abuses are found, than would be feasible with only annual audits, months after the fiscal year closing. The locations would be chosen some by sampling and some by supervision alerts. The central audit bureau (BPKP) will coordinate its sampling of communities for audit with audit agencies at lower levels. They will review due diligence and due process, and the attainment of performance as per agreed indicators. 3. Technical For small works, the standard MPW guidelines will be used as relevant and the local agency will be consulted for areawide implications. For economic activities, a screening will be undertaken at the community Page 11 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD level and as there is expected to be competition for the funds, only the best proposals are expected to be funded. Consultants will verify the technical quality and compliance with any required environmental and compensation guidelines before approving subprojects and disbursements. A new "technical" manual is not proposed, but the guidelines, procurement methods, reporting, etc. (annexes to this PAD) will be widely available, in a Project Manual and on the Web, in Indonesian.
4. Institutional An effort is needed up front to train local agency staff, oversight consultants andkelurahan facilitatorswith the simplest of criteria and requirements (PAD Annexes are the basis) for a start of the program in 1305 kelurahans--with some 23 million urban residents, and presumably more than 1 million households eligible and interested in participating. Mobilizing non-profit organizations and community groups such as religious groups, is essential (see 7. below). Paying facilitators partly based on subprojects disbursement progress should improve standard performance. The project will also train facilitators from the communities, to assist in the future. The preparation has a critical path plan (Annex 11). 5. Social and resettlement [x] Summarizeissues below [] To be defined [] No issues Rapid assessments were made during July 1998 by the project preparation team in 10 provinces, in poor communities and at local agencies, to test and refine the approach and to identify the best ways to disseminate information on the program (for instance, the idea of a TV campaign was discarded; the appropriatenessof the area coverage was confirmed). Some rapid assessments have also been conducted under ongoing urban projects, notably in relation to labor intensive works, and the Bank undertook 2 crisis assessments in 1998 (one early on based on the SUSENAS and later, a "trend" survey). There is always the risk that the poorest will be the least able to access project funds. However, some competition for funds has to be kept to encourage the best uses and sustainability, while the selection will be based on consensus or voting in the kelurahan. The credit size cannot cover all poor and the project does not pretend to be able to solve all problems. Thus, the poorest people would continue to need access to free meals, assistance with school expenses, etc. as is foreseen by the Government. (targeting is discussed under "Economic",above)
No resettlement is expected. Any land acquisition would be very minor, since the grants do not finance it and poor residents can't afford it. Still, resettlement guidelines apply (Annex 13; the same guidelines apply for the Municipal Innovations Project that would be implementedin parallel).
6. Environmentalassessment: n.a. Environmentalcategory: [ ] A [ x] B [ ] C The environmental guidelines developed for the Municipal Innovations Project apply for the proposed project, as well. It is expected that works will be minor and if anything, they should have a positive environmental effect. Some economic activities may have some negative impact (such as toxic effluents from textile dyes, etc.). All negative impacts should be identified by the oversight consultants and mitigating measures proposed and adopted, and monitored. 7. Participatory approach [key stakeholders, how involved, and what they have influenced; if participatory approach not used, describe why not applicable] The proposed Kelurahan Forum will enable a wider participation in community decisions and will have increased resources under local decision-making. The community groups are to identify and implement the subprojects to be financed. Facilitators will help with targeting, and consultants (that may beNGOs, consulting firms, government agencies, universities) will assist the subproject process. Community groups can select their own facilitators and will handle their payment, based on output or profit sharing. Local agencies can assist more than under traditionalprojects. That is, a wide spectrum of stakeholders is involved. Several meetings have taken place early this year with representatives of the more widely represented non- profit organizations (these are more active outside Java) and religious groups. They expressed support to the Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 12 proposed assistance, willingness to work with the communities, to mobilize their local chapters and to compete for contracts. Municipal agencies have also expressed their support and requested project funds be made available soonest; many have started programs on their own (such as urban agriculture for production of food, labor intensive works). Rapid assessments have also been conducted for project preparation (see above). F: Sustainability and Risks
1. Sustainability:
The proposed project has limited but important objectives: provide people with purchasing power in a better way than distributing cash for consumption; improve local infrastructure and environment; fund sustainable subprojects; develop community and local institutions. Lessons may be learnt that can be used to deal more permanently with urban poverty reduction in Indonesia and elsewhere: for instance, in the promotion of urban agriculture, assistance to improve housing, promotion of training, credits in the absence of a functioning banking system, etc.
2. Critical Risks (reflecting assumptions in thefourth column ofAnnex 1): Risk Risk Risk Minimization Measure Rating Annex 1, cell "from Outputs to Objective"
Improper targeting and capture by elites M Careful training and follow up Inconsistent incentives across poverty programs M Interministerial committees can provide consistency in "benefits" Lack of market for economic outputs M The poor assisted to focus on marketable products and skills
Annex 1, cell "from Components to Outputs"
Lack of counterpart funds M MoF ensured availability of GOI funds prior to and after credit effectiveness. Insufficient facilitator capacity M Trainers engaged to accelerate facilitator deployment and know-how. Improper use of funds S Built-in community surveillance, incentives, transparency, audits, penalties for misuse, outsider reviews
Overall Risk Rating M RiskRating - H (HighRisk), S (SubstantialRisk), M (Modest Risk), N (Negligible or Low Risk)
Some questions arose whether this level of assistance would a) overwhelm NGO and local consultant capacities--the increased social programs leave limited consultant availability; emphasis is placed on training, including government staff; b) undermine informal safety nets--the needs are much greater than usual and the proposed assistance may not be enough; if the assistance is not in demand by target groups, it would be redirected, as it is not an entitlement; c) result in leakages--the transparency features should help reduce leakages compared to other programs. A concern is that the many welfare programs would undermine the sustainability desired under the project. 3. Possible ControversialAspects: Probably the major controversy would arise if the Bank did not assist. This could result in less well prrepared welfare programs being expanded. The risks of the project have been discussed and addressed as possible-still, remaining risks will have to be accepted as better program alternatives could not be identified. Page 13 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD
Perfect targeting is not feasible at reasonable cost, but given the area selection, types of programs and incentives built into project aspects, most beneficiaries should be poor if not the poorest. The lack of ex-ante detailed economic return justifications is not uncommon in poverty programs; but returns of potential activities are normally good.
G: Main Credit Conditions 1. Effectiveness conditions: Standardrequirements only. 2. Other [classify according to covenant types used in the CreditAgreement]
The main covenants relate to project implementation (description in Annex 2), monitoring, transparency, compliance with the Bank's guidelines for land acquisition and environmental criteria as may be applicable. Dated covenants (expected after credit effectiveness)relate to:
a) Selection of PjOKs for 1500 project kelurahan by not later than September 15, 1999 (a second phase). b) Issuance of public information on the project to second phase projectkelurahan residents, by not later than October 15, 1999. c) Provision of reports on the project implementation:quarterly reports by April 30, July 31 and October 31; annual reports by January 31 each year; monitoring and evaluation reports also by January 31. d) Review of project reports with the IDA by March 1 each project year.
H. Readinessfor Implementation
A consultant team (financed with a PHRD grant) was recruited early July 1998. It has undertaken field surveys/rapid assessments and refined the project concept. Statistics on urban areas were obtained and analyzed. Local agencies have ranked kelurahans by 1998 poverty levels. The team had started project implementation activities, such as the advance process procurement of oversight consultants and kelurahan facilitators (353 expressions of interest were received following advertising in 6 provincial newspapers). Requests for bids including terms of reference, draft contract, letter of invitationwith supplementary clarifications, evaluation criteria and data on the areas to be assisted were provided to 45 firms shortlisted for 9 contracts. Bid evaluation was completed in April. Further, 5 training teams, from the private sector and including staff from MoHA, were selected to conduct parallel series of training sessions for facilitators, that started in April. Preparation for and the training are also financed by the grant and mobilization of consultants are financed by the SUDP loan, both ahead of credit effectiveness. The national level management consultancy has been advertised; shortlisted firms were invited to bid./ is awaited before . Alternative project circulars were tested in a few neighborhoods and one was finalized.
A draft Project Manual with the project description and procedures (PAD Annexes and explanations, in Indonesian, including bookkeeping requirements) was available in December 1998; the final Manual was cleared and printed in April 1999. The regulation establishing the Secretariat for the project in Bappenas has been signed. MoF has agreed to prefmance the initial advance to kelurahans, beyond its 10% share. MoHA has selected PjOKs for the 1305 kelurahans to be assisted first, by Mayl5, 1999. BRI has agreed to handle disbursements under the kelurahan grants; further discussions on procedures will take place in May 1999. A disseminationbrochure on the project also has been agreed and printed.
The (revised) critical preparation path and project implementationplan are in Annex 11. The aim is credit effectiveness and to be ready for the first disbursements for subprojectsin the communities around July 1999.
I. Compliancewith Bank Policies
This project is expected to comply with all Bank policies. Indonesia:Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 14
[signature] Task Team Leader/Task Manager: ¶da Johansen
[signature] A 4 Sector Manager: _Es_m
[signature] Country Manager/Director: Mark Baird Page 15 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD ANNEX 1 URBAN POVERTY PROJECT PROJECT DESIGN SUMMARY
Narrative Summary Key PerformanceIndicators Monitoring and Evaluation Critical Assumptions Sector-relatedCAS Goal: (Goal to Bank Mission)
Reducing poverty n.a. under project; CAS, CEM reports GOI, and IMF; macro and SUSENAS, employment, micro; policies and Participationby and other data objectives are consistent. communities Political stability.
Decentralization
Project Development (Objective to Goal) Objective: # of participating kelurahans MIS Project reporting Transparent information, starting: Helpful facilitatorsand Improve or restore initially: Northern Java, Yearly implementation consultants, infrastructure and income 1,305 large kelurahans review Good selection of sustainably in poor urban later: other kelurahans on Independentmonitoring kelurahan/groups communities, with a bottom Java Financial statements: KPKN up approach. No delays in counterpart Transfers to communities: Beneficiary satisfaction funds; in reporting Improve local institutions. 1999: $24 m equivalent surveys 2000: $50 m equivalent 2001: $17 m equivalent Kelurahan books 2002: $3 m equivalent Outputs: (Outputs to Objective) Project MIS; monthly, by Public infrastructures # of subprojects;benefits subdistrict, district & Consistent incentives across province poverty programs. Economic activities # of subprojects;returns Yearly implementation review; monitoring; audits Market identification,timely Employment # of subproject beneficiaries Supervisionfindings repayment of credit. # m-m employment Newspaper articles Final evaluation Project Components Inputs: (budget for each (Componentsto Outputs) component) Subprojects $109.4m Secretariat/TA/Bank/BPKP Counterpart means available TA for implementation $ 15.5m will supervise,monitor, Facilitator capacity TA for monitoring $ 1.5m audit inputs and outputs, Proper use of project funds GOI administration $ 3.3m SoEs
Total $129.7m Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 16
URBAN POVERTY PROJECT KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Indicators 1/ Calendar year 1999 2000 2/ 2001 2/ I. INPUTS Cumulativenumber of kelurahans assisted, target 1,305 2,800 2,800 Disbursementsto Kelurahans,target Rp.bn 200 400 130 Oversight consultants/facilitators,persons 1,900 3,000 2,000 Government PjOKs and facilitators,persons >700 >1,000 >1,000
II. OUTPUTS Subprojects Cumulative number of proposals 8,000 17,000 20,000 Percentage of proposals, approved >80% >80% >80% Subloan repaymentper schedule: . Principal, % of due >80% >85% >90% . Interest, % of due >80% >85% >90% Percentage of works completed per schedule >75% >85% >90%
Monitoring Number of sites monitoredby Secretariat >10% >10% >10% Number of sites monitoredby Level II ------each kelurahan twice /year ------
Audits, kelurahansample 2.5% 2.5% 2.5%
III. IMPACTS Independentmonitoring (NGOs, universities, etc.) ----- 10% of kelurahan surveyed/year------Beneficiary satisfactionsurveys: ----- 10% of kelurahan surveyed/year----- . % of persons surveyed, aware of program >70% >80% >90% . % of persons surveyed, satisfiedwith program >50% >60% >70% 1/ All indicatorsto be available by subdistrict,district and province levels; inputs, subprojects and monitoringupdated on a monthly basis, as part of a computerizedMIS (see below). Disaggregationalso to be available. 2/ Number of additional kelurahan and disbursementsin rupiah depend on the rupiah/dollar exchange rate.
COMPUTERIZED MIS DATA A number of other indicators are crucial to ascertain performance of the project, but targets cannot be provided at this stage because they depend on the selectionsto be made by the communities. Among the indicators the MIS has to provide, are:
Subprojects Funds for microcredit Target: 30% of area population to benefit Capital disbursed, Rp. M Infrastructuresubprojects Times revolved in 6 months period . Grants, # and Rp.m Interest accrued/repaid . Progress, physical and disbursements Training/apprenticeships . Workers, men and women: #, wage, total wages Cumulative subloans, Rp.m Economic activities Men /women, training m-m Subloans, # and Rp.m Cost per m-m, Rp New subloans with repayments, # and Rp.m Number employed after training Participationof women, % persons, % value Repayment,Rp. Transparency Impacts Number of meetingsheld in Project kelurahans Only part of the information on impacts can be in the MIS, Time required to establish Kelurahan Forum /groups Monitoringboards, number and adequacy Income generation; benefits, beneficiaries, sustainability,etc. Complaints;Web site; email address; P.O. Box Newspaper articles Page 17 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD
ANNEX 2 URBAN POVERTYPROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Objectives. To fund activities to benefit the poor in kelurahan on an ongoing basis via a) capital to revolve for sustainable income generation and b) grants for basic infrastructure works and related employment. Activities should be through community participation in selection and implementation, should be transparent and open to scrutiny. Broadly, to empower urban communities to help them overcome poverty, and to improve capability of local agencies to assist poor communities.
Where? The project will begin in 59 districts of Java, in the northern half and in Yogyakarta, Bandung and Malang, where most of the dense urban areas and urban poor are (district list attached). They comprise 1305 kelurahans with more than 7500 persons each and total some 23 million people (first phase) and 1540 smaller kelurahan, totaling some 7 million. Bappedas I and II have ranked kelurahans in the 59 districts. "Southem" Java comprises 1,360 kelurahan, of which 1,052 are small. Coverage of a second phase will be determined about mid- 1999, and depends partly on the rupiah exchange rate that determines the loan funding reach. Camats are to pinpoint the poorer RWs (each kelurahan averages 10 RW, each RW averages 500 families) based on income levels and other household poverty criteria. After site verification visits, the oversight consultant will confirm with the camat and lurah, the selection of neighborhoods. At this stage, "group" targeting takes over from "location" targeting.
Funding allocations. Allocations are grants to kelurahans varying according to size (table overleaf). To facilitate transparency at the local level there is a ceiling of RplO0 million per RW-however, funds are not entitlements and may be redirected from kelurahans with low progress after 12 months. The grants will be allocated to each kelurahan 1 time under the project.
Uses of funds. The kelurahan grant is for subloans for sustainable economic activities and for grants for upgrading and building small public infrastructures, by demand by community groups. Subprojects have to be proposed within 6 months of program launch in the kelurahan but funds can be used over 1 year from the date of the initial advance.
Economic activities. The menu is open. Examples of possible activities: urban agriculture; group training in the communities (a subloan can cover a stipend); equipment (such as sewing machines, computers); programs for children and youth; community based housing provided it can be done within 1 year; family planning education. Each kelurahan can also establish a microcredit fund to provide small revolving credits to individuals and groups. Microcreditscan be requested for training (apprenticeships(training on the job where the employer may pay part of a minimum wage and a subloan pay the balance, for up to 6 months); other public or private training programs (lists may be available at Dikmas atDepnaker). New street shops are discouraged. The following cannot be funded: arms, harmful drugs, depositing project funds in banks to earn interest, land acquisition, religious buildings, government administration,environmentally harmful products. Group eligibility. Groups (KSMs) formed for economic activities should have at least 3 members (different households); incomes of a family of 4 should be less than about Rp250,000 per month (this amount may be adjusted with inflation by year 2; to attract higher skills, up to a third of the members may have higher incomes); some BKKBN poverty criteria would also apply (is the household head working; is the spouse working; do they rent the house; quality of house). Membership of the KSM would be agreed by the Kelurahan Forum (KF). Each group/person can get funds only once (at least until there are no acceptable proposals by new groups/persons). Women are encouragedto participate and shall have equal opportunity. Subloans have to be repaid within a year, with interest at the commercial rate prevailing for one year loans; the repayment schedule should reflect the cash flow of the financed activity. The repayments are to be deposited in a Kelurahan Forum account in a local bank of the KF choice, in its name, for revolving following the same principles. This local bank has to be willing to let designated staff attend some KF meetings. The accounts shall not Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 18 have ATM cards. Half of the interest accrued should be used to help finance maintenance of local public infrastructure;another part should be used to help finance administrationof the Kelurahan Forum. Grantsfor small infrastructure. The communitymay choose to improve infrastructure, such as under KIP, upgrading public spaces or parks, greening, environmental improvements. Workers building or repairing selected public infrastructure will be paid based on output, the equivalent of local minimum wage levels, calculated based on reasonable productivity rates. Anybody accepting a minimum wage is eligible for participating in such public works. Someworks may be contracted. Some clarifications are in attachment. Accounting. Each group is expected to keep books for its own activity, and provide summaries to the Kelurahan Forum Treasurer on a monthly basis. Facilitators are expected to assist with bookkeeping.
KELURAHAN Very small Small Medium Large Very large 1995Population, persons <7,500 7,500-15,000 15,001-22,500 22,501-30,000 >30,000
Grant size RplOOm Rp250m Rp500m Rp750m Rpl,250m (average per capita) (Rp22,000) (Rp24,000) (Rp27,000) (Rp28,000) (Rp29,000)
Microcredit Fund Facilitators hired by Consultant (OC): Kelurahan Facilitators 0.5-1 1 1-2 2 3-4 CommunityFacilitator 1/5,000pers. 1 2-3 3-4 4-5 6-8 Remuneration: * Kelurahan Facilitator: hired by consultant for 24 months, paid Rp500,000 per month plus 2% of the value of subprojectsapproved in parallel to disbursements from BRI. (OC are at district/subdistrict) * Community Trainee Facilitator: volunteers screened and paid up to 6 months RplOO,000/month by the OC. * Group Technical Assistant: asked by community groups to assist with preparation and implementation of subprojectsand paid under the subproject funding (kelurahan funds) or by profit sharing. Maximum allocation per RW: Rp 100 m; Subprojectcost/group: Minimum Rp 5 m; maximum Rp 30 m Selection of proposals. Proposals. People wishing to participate are expected to contribute some funds or labor to the activities they propose; while there is no minimum requirement, contributions should enhance the likelihood of their proposal being selected/approvedin the KF. Each group prepares a subproject proposal on a standard format provided by the Kelurahan Facilitator, signed by the group members. The proposals will include a description of the activities proposed, costs, the amount of self financing,subloan or grant amount, funding and repayment dates, beneficiaries, O&M plans, compliance with any applicable guidelines on asset/land acquisition or environmental impacts, etc. (some clarifications in attachment). Implementationperiods shall not exceed a year from the time of initial funding. Proposal evaluation. A proposal has first to be approved by the oversight consultant, who reviews its feasibility and compliance with guidelines, before it can be submitted to the KF. The program does not set a scoring or evaluation system to prioritize proposals; the evaluation system is left at the discretion of the KF, to facilitate it maximizing benefits from the funds and the local opportunities identified. The KF will meet to review proposals first when it has 5 proposals, and at least monthly thereafter. The selection of proposals shall be made in a meeting publicized in advance and open to the public; the KF shall rank the proposals, members have one vote each, voting should be visible. The KF will endeavor to approve only good proposals, up to exhausting the allocation. The KF has 6 months from the project start in the kelurahan (first dissemination of information by the Kelurahan Facilitator) to present proposals to the PjOK for use of the allocation. Proposals can consolidate various Page 19 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD subprojects of lower costs (e.g. several small business loans). The Dinas PUK has to be consulted about areawide implications of infrastructureproposals. Implementation agreements. For economic activities, the OC and KF leader sign proposals they have approved, and the lurah countersigns. The signed proposal is attached to an Implementation Agreement, that is signed by the group representative (and all group members overleaf) and the PjOK. The PjOK is appointed by the Bupati or Walikota for 24 months and is to be based at the kecamatan office; he would be from level II except in Jakarta where the PjOK would come from the kecamatan. For infrastructure subprojects, the same applies except that the lurah signs the ImplementationAgreement with the PjOK. A copy is provided to each signatory. Disbursements for subprojects. Establishment of the KF is a precondition to any disbursement. Initially the OC, the Kelurahan Facilitator, the lurah, the KF representative if different from thelurah, and the PjOK provide signature specimens at the designated BRI office. The initial subproject funding can be withdrawn by the community group by presenting the signed ImplementationAgreement; BRI verifies the signatures and the amount; the group representative has to sign for the withdrawal. The second disbursement can be withdrawn with approval from the Kelurahan Facilitator after verifying appropriate use of earlier funds. The final disbursement shall be authorized by the OC after verification of results. The PjOK endorses the payment requests. Procurement. Procurement will follow best commercial practice. The oversight consultants appoint Kelurahan Facilitators, individuals or firms, under their own contract or under service subcontracts, based on 3 offers. Gender balance will be sought. For Group TechnicalAssistants the groups and KF can appoint individuals, as needed; the OC may provide long lists to assist with identification of candidates.Goods shall be procured after quotations are obtained from at least 3 suppliers on the basis of a detailed description and quantity of goods, as well as the desired delivery time and place. Worksthat can be implemented efficiently with labor intensive methods can be undertaken by community participation. Other works can be contracted under lump sum, fixed price contracts awarded on the basis of quotations obtained from 3 domestic contractors in response to a written invitation. The invitation shall include a detailed description of the works, including basic specifications, required completion date, a basic form of agreement and relevant drawings, where applicable. The award shall be made to the contractor who offers the lowest price quotation for the required work, and who has the experience and resources to complete the contract successfully.(procurement forms in Annex) Kelurahan administration. Kelurahan Forum (KYF).A KF comprised of RW or RT representatives (a man and a woman) would be established for approval of subprojects. Elected LKMD officials can participate in a private capacity. LKMDs to be established during 1999-2000 according to the new local govemment law may be the KF or part of it. A KF leader/chairpersonshall be elected; it may be a lurah but in a private capacity. The final KF formation will be legalized through an SK from the Bupati or Walikota. The KF can meet at the LKMD office or another venue. A Financial Unit (UPK) will be established to record disbursements from the kelurahan grant, and to manage the kelurahan revolving fund. The UPK will have a charter as a profit center; will be notarized and will be audited yearly by accountants from outside the kelurahan. The OC will check this is done. This fund shall receive repayments from subloans and their interest; the funds shall be onlent to new activities selected on the same basis. The Treasurer of the UPK should be a woman of a functioning local organization (the term may be one year, renewable; she should have at least a D3). She will follow a standardized bookkeeping system. A person may be designated debt collector. Another person(s) shall be trained by the Kelurahan Facilitator as community facilitator. Fees. Work on behalf of the KF is voluntary;however, certain work requiring significant time may be compensated (head, treasurer, debt collector, facilitator, audits) provided it is carried out correctly (e.g. the books are in order, debt collection is complete, facilitators are active in the role). Administration may be rewarded with up to 2% of the kelurahan grant amount; the percentage will be included as overhead in the Implementation Agreementsand be paid by the groups when they withdraw funds from BRI. Subsequently, administration can be financed from the revolving fund interest, as to be agreed within the KF. About half the interest accrued should be used for maintenance of local infrastructure. Facilitators. Local organizationswill be engaged a few days by the oversight consultant (see below) at the Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 20 program start to distribute circulars in selected neighborhoods; the circulars invite to a meeting to provide information about the program at the kelurahan. Then the communities will be assisted by Kelurahan Facilitators (hired by the consultant for 24 months to provide initial information about the program and later, to assist with proposal preparation and to monitor implementation).Kelurahan Facilitators would come from nearby, and live in the districts or subdistricts they are to assist; they would thus incur low transportation costs and maximize their time in the field, and would not get a housing allowance. The facilitators will have a "social" background and training in facilitation; they may come from NGOs, Universities, local yayasans, women's groups, the Government's ongoing training programs. There would be initially one Kelurahan Facilitator per kelurahan, 2 in the larger ones. They would be encouraged not to cover more than 12 groups, that is considered the maximum effective control span. All the facilitators will be trained in the program before they mobilize. Their pay rates are in the table above. Group TechnicalAssistants for preparationand implementationof subprojects, can be asked by community groups to help. Assistants are expected to have expertise other than "social". Their fee would be agreed by the group and included in the proposal. The fee could be paid from the subproject funding as a percentage of the subproject cost but groups will be encouraged to reward assistants in the form of sharing of profits. Assistants who worked on proposals that are not approved, may not be paid, or be paid a minimum fee to encourage participation. Community Trainee Facilitators, one for every 5,000 persons in the kelurahan, are to be recruited and trained by Kelurahan Facilitators and paid by the oversight consultant for 6 months; if retained, they may be paid by the KF from accrued interest on loans. Oversight consultants. Consultants and an initial minimum number of facilitators are hired under 9 contracts for phase 1, kelurahans larger than 7,500 in northern Java (2 contracts for each of West, Central and East Java and Jakarta and one for Yogyakarta, with an average of almost 150 kelurahans per contract) for 2 years, to establish overview consultant teams and subteams to facilitate access to poor communities. The local subteam address would be stamped on the circulars to be distributed door to door. The process: calls for expressions of interest, shortlisting, encouraging firms to forn associations, selection on competitive basis of quality and price, training in the principles of the program including technical, environmental, any resettlement and procurement aspects, to conform with the program guidelines. The teams would include engineers, economists, small business advisors, to be able to handle the various aspects that may be involved in proposals; and a core number of facilitators, with social background. Additional expert services would be provided on a retainer basis (paid by output). Procurement and training is done from the Project Secretariat in Jakarta. For an eventual third year or continuation,the districts may procure the consultants. The designated oversight consultant may have to return proposals to the facilitator/assistant requesting further work prior to releasing proposals for review by the KF. Upon KF approval, the OC, KF leader and lurah countersign the proposals and the Implementation Agreements are prepared for signing by thePjOK and the group members. The consultants are also responsible for random prior review of procurement of at least 5% of the ImplementationAgreements, and for the project management information system and reporting in his area. The OC are subject to audit and shall keep records of their activities. Transparency. Transparency is essential. Free information flow is to raise awareness of rights and responsibilities of stakeholders, to minimize collusion or malpractice by localelites or borrowers. At the project start, a one page circular may be posted in public places in preselected poor neighborhoods, such as markets, public thoroughfares, schools, worship places, through religious organizations, localNGOs and agency staff. The circular will be distributed door to door by facilitators in the poorest neighborhoods. The circular encourages women to participate. Women and men shall have equal opportunity. Project procedures are emphasized in facilitator training. A Project Manual (this description including program start dates by location, plus standard forms, bookkeeping system and environmentaland land acquisition/resettlementguidelines) will be available at the kelurahan and camat offices and posted on a Website. Discussions of proposals would be in the LKMD meeting room or other suitable venues. Groups can "defend" their proposals; all residents are free to participate in discussions at the proceedings; but only the Page 21 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD representatives of the RW/RTs will decide, and vote with open tallying if needed. Approved proposals have to be advertised in the respective RT, and posted on public information boards one of which shall be located outside the lurah's office, as would the names of the group leader and members; and monthly, the groups' progress, payments and repayments in the case of the economic activities. A Coordination Committee for Social Programs is being established at district level.KelurahanFacilitators may invite concerned citizens and groups to participate in meetings of this Committee, or to form an Urban Community Forum at district or subdistrict level, to get involvedin shaping and assisting community development. Complaints.KFs with the OCs and facilitators are to establisha kelurahan complaint and suggestions box. If an irregularity is observed in the kelurahan and it is not addressed satisfactorily there, complaints and questions about the project can be directed to the facilitator or to the oversight consultant. OCs are required to suggest a dispute settlementprocedure, and to play an active role in arbitration if required. Complaints can also be sent to the P.O.Box.2222, Jakarta, and the [email protected] address of the Project Secretariat; these addresses will be publicized. Complaints will be recorded and reported by the OC, made available for public consultation, and followed up within a month. Anonymous complaints are acceptable, but may be given lower priority than signed ones. The independent monitoring consultant is to act as "Ombudsman". Awards and sanctions. The communities are encouraged to select and recognize the best performing group in a public ceremony. It is expected that the communities will raise to the challenge of empowerment this project provides, and that they will self-monitor and take the lead in enforcing proper conduct. However, prospective borrowers from an RW with a non-compliantgroup (e.g. group repayments not on schedule) shouldnot be eligible to borrow from the revolving fund. Facilitators will not be paid unless their performance is satisfactory for the group and "certified" by the oversight team. The oversight team should have no incentives for misconduct. To encourage continuous improvement in performance, a system of performance indicators will be established by the Project Secretariat, to increase ownership and feedback and guide behaviors. Independentmonitoring. The Secretariat or the districts, will hire after competitive bidding, independent, local firms to survey and review progress, transparency, profiles of laborers and beneficiaries, etc. Monitoring firms will also undertake a survey of initial conditions and surveys of project satisfaction among the communities. The local governments should participate in reviewing progress, as can journalists. Self monitoring by communities will be encouraged. Monitoring findings, and regular progress report findings, will be published in local newspapers and discussed in Forum meetings. Audits. Financial and technical (performance) audits will be performed as for all government programs, by BPKP on an anmualand sampling basis, of groups, KFs and consultants, the project BRI offices. The various audit levels will coordinate their sampling. Emphasis will be on due process and due diligence, and on performance indicators as agreed. BPKP audit reports should be complete by December 30 for expenditures incurred the previous fiscal year. The KF, OC and groups, and branches have to keep records of the activities for 3 years, and make them available to independentreviewers if so requested. Accounts of the UPK shall be audited yearly before June 30, by a licensed accountant from another kelurahan, paid by the KF. Attachments: List of districts in year 1, and their implementationstaging Circular; Clarification for subproject eligibility Group composition checklist Standard forms (Implementationagreements, procurement forms, proposal forns) Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 22 General information not relevant to process in the communities Executing Agency. Overall coordination, management, budgeting and monitoring responsibilities will be with a Secretariat/PMU in Bappenas, under the Regional Development Deputy. The Secretariat will include staff from concerned agencies. A Coordination Committee, chaired by Bappenas, would resolve coordination problems. The Secretariat will have management assistance by a consulting firm, to train, review and supervise the oversight firms and establish and keep up to date a computerized information system. The Secretariat will also disseminate information to local agencies and train agency facilitators. Level II agencies will select a PjOK, to be located at the kecamatan level. Selected government facilitators will get the same training as the consultant facilitators. Funding process. The channelingBRI office will be informed of the amount of thekelurahan grant; when constituted, the KF will open a Kelurahan Forum Account and relevant signature specimens are recorded in the BRI office. This shall receive funding after the PjOK endorses the documentation from the groups and forwards it to the KPKN, that in turn requests BI to transfer the required amount to the BRI office Kelurahan account. The initial transfer is expected to be 40% of the kelurahan grant; a second transfer of 40% would follow when the account balance is 10%, the OC and KF are satisfied with the use of earlier funds and with the justification of further funding, and the PjOK endorses it. The final 20% will follow in the same way. The BRI office can disburse to the group against approved subproject documentation (agreement or claim amounts) after verification of signatures. It will have a record of credits and debits, and verify that the latter do not exceed the former; it will also verify that it does not disburse more than was approved for each subproject (debits should be identified by date and withdraweT). Records shall be made available to monitorers and auditors upon request. BRI may invest partially any balance and keep interest it may accrue, to compensate for operating costs incurred, but at any time shall have sufficient liquidity to pay claims within the balance amount. Periodically BRI would provide disbursement statements by kecamatan and kabupaten (may be province and kelurahan) and send a statement to the Project Secretariatand DG Budget, Ministry of Finance. Each Kelurahan Forum account will be funded as follows: the initial 40% transfer, to comprise 10% of the kelurahan grant amount funded by GOI, and 30% from the Special Account in Bank Indonesia, from the World Bank credit; subsequent transfers, 100% from the SA. This results in 90% financing from the credit. In turn, the DG Budget asks for replenishment of the Special Account from the World Bank. Payments to the oversight consultants and the national management consultant will be by Jakarta's BIIKPKN,upon authorizationof the Project Secretariat. PjOK shall have a budget provided by the national budget for this program. Page 23 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD URBAN POVERTYPROJECT CASH FLOW SCHEMEAT KELURAHAN Grant Agreement Completion| First Fund Request Request Request Copete Null Transfer of l | Request Funds to BR, incomplete Epense \ | equesfo| |Withdraa positive _/ alance \ op *| | balance A KPKN | unacceptable / FCorrectR e iBRI Balance Report 4acceptable Withdrawal Expense from BRI Report Tnmissing ,>4 million / Bank < million Balance ColletedoFe s available Payments Receipts Booeepin Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 24 Attachment Clarificationsfor eligibility of some types of subprojects Both small public infrastructures and economic activities are allowed, but some types of subproject require special attention. a) Public infrastructures are such as under KIP, and can be done by the community or by contractors contracted by the community/groupfollowing shoppingprocedures. Water supply installations would in principle not be eligible, given that the PDAMs would have to be involved in the process to make sure that water is available, pipes are the right size and location, etc.; however, RTs could use grant funding for partial payment of standard connectionfees. b) Some environmental improvements, such as composting initiatives, can use grant funding only for the capital cost, not for the subsequent operation; O&M should be viable without subsidies. If this condition cannot be met, then the capital subsidy should not be provided. This should be verified by the facilitators/oversight consultant. The grants can cover regreening of parks or areas for public use provided the land is made available. The environmentalguidelines in the Project Manual have to be followed. c) Proposals for agriculture on idle urban land have to attach a written contract with the land owner, showing his permission for use of the land, the allowed period, and any agreed fee, and signed by the parties and witnessed by the camat (to avoid the land user later claiming land rights and the land owner claiming rights to the output proceeds). Rotation of land users may be encouraged, and means found to avoid current users not caring about depleting the soil, not rotating crops or not fertilizing as necessary for sustained use. d) Community housing and urban renewal proposals, have to follow kotamadya land use plans, and have a full financing scheme presented at the discussion of proposals at the Kelurahan Forum. Menpera's scheme may be followed. The Bappedas II may be requested to review the izins (prinsip and lokasi) and to revoke expired ones; this could free up land and could lower land prices. e) Land acquisition. No proposal should require more than minimal land acquisition, and none will involve involuntary resettlement. The project's land acquisition and resettlement guidelines are in Annex. Records of any land acquisition and people's consent will be maintained by the Administration office/Treasurer of the project in the kelurahan. The project funds cannot be used for land acquisition. Guidelines in the Project Manual have to be followed. Page 25 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD KELURAHANCOVERAGE A: SUMMARYBY PROVINCEON JAVA Phase 1: NORTHERNJAVA, BANDUNG,YOGYAKARTA AND MALANG Kelurahans>7,500 PROVINCE Tk II Kecamatan Kelurahan Grants # Kelurahan 1995 Popul. # 1/ Rp bn Facilitators Millions DKI Jakarta 5 43 249 224 487 7.71 West Java 15 192 542 203 587 7.94 Central Java 17 153 174 55 181 2.11 East Java 17 191 242 98 286 3.71 Yogyakarta 5 47 98 30 103 1.21 All 59 626 1305 610 1644 22.7 Firstphase, to start inJanuary/February 1999 - detailsoverleaf Phase 2: Eligible kelurahan, to start about September 1999 NORTHERNJAVA, BANDUNG,YOGYAKARTA AND MALANG Kelurahans<7,500 PROVINCE Additional Kelurahan Grants 1995 Popul. Kecamatan Rp bn Millions DKI Jakarta 0 16 1.6 0.09 West Java 11 400 40.0 2.06 Central Java 2 569 57.9 2.37 East Java 18 528 53.8 2.10 Yogyakarta 0 27 2.7 0.15 All +31 1540 154 6.7 "SOUTHERN"(rest of) JAVA PROVINCE Tk II Kecamatan Kelurahan Kelurahan Grants 1995 Popul. # 1/ <7,500 Rp bn Millions West Java 11 87 292 265 35.5 2.05 Central Java 18 168 570 384 94.4 3.42 East Java 20 142 498 403 68.3 2.75 All 49 397 1,360 1,052 198.2 8.2- Note:Kelurahans also compriseurban villages, as classifiedby BPS. Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 26 B: SUMMARY by KELURAHAN SIZE KELURAHIAN Very small Small Medium Large Very large Total w/o Total very small Population <7,500 7,500- 15,001- 22,501- >30,000 thresholds 15,000 22,500 30,000 Grant /kelurahan RplOOm Rp250m Rp500m Rp750m Rpl,250m Average/capita 22,000 Rp23,500 27,300 28,750 29,200 Rp26,000 "NorthernJava" # kelurahan 1,540 2,845 1995 Population 6.7 m 2.9. m Grants RplS4.Obn Rp764.3bn "Southen Java" #kelurahan 1,052 266 28 130 4 78 1,360 1995 Population 4.7 m 2.7 m 2.1 m 0.3 m 1.1 m 3.6 m 8.3 m Grants Rp2O5.2bn Rp66.6bn Rpl4.Obn Rp7.5bn Rp5.Obn Rp93.lbn Rp198.3bn Off-Java # kelurahan 2,031 609 114 35 28 786 2,817 1995Population 7.3 m 6.2m 2.1in 0.9in 1.1m 10.4in 17.7m Grantcost Rp203.lbn Rpl52.2bn Rp57.0bn Rp26.3bn Rp35.0bn Rp270.5bn Rp473.6bn Indonesia Total # kelurahan 4,623 1,635 408 168 188 2,399 7,022 1995 Population 18.7 m 16.8 m 7.5 m 4.4 m 7.9 m 36.7 m 55.4 m Grant cost Rp462.3bn Rp408.7bn Rp204.Obn RpI26.0bn Rp235.Obn Rp973.9bn Rpl,436.2bn Shaded: Phase 1 Off-Java and Total Indonesia shown for information only. Page 27 Indonesia:Urban Poverry ProjectTAD FTARKELURAMAN SASARAN MP TAHAPI RUPINS1,ust, 11,KM 1, ut. It. K ..0-4 3umrAH INw, vau 13, JUMLAH I NLLUKAkIAN tmtua LAN U.- I MR-) 1. W JAKAtCTA INM6 51 170,2m,000 Ljr.QzAmady*RE _B"mll 1,199,47Z 5-it Lwl 1.1 KOM-clyaJakma 401 36,000,OW 1, Kalliderel - 4 KLhNUFK 36,1111 1, :W.uuq j. rancor- 32 548 1,2wm MALAKAJAYA 44,5521 1,25O.Uvq I L)UKtN ilUA /W. ]EYEKES 3 [, 43 # 44" (1731 t 1.2bulLUM ,2 FENGADFOAN 24,1091 [,-,u,uw JTWAUUNUAN 29,426 7 8941 i,zw,uuul 3 KAWAJA Yl 17,649 WV, lbu,wA - 3 1 UuKtN w I J9,259i 1,z5U. 4 FANCOPAN i 22,729 750,-DM 4S,915 f 1.250,uoq 2, Crm-gk.m IK794 i!LhN4lF.AKtNU, MALKA I 4. ,_,Zv 1,250,UOCI 8. Ciram 103,104 C iuuuuw 118 1 LENTENQ AGUNC, 45,17 2 1CENUKARENG TORUR ------46M 1 - 1 1,KELAPADUAWk:LAN 25,9 2 LIPLUAY, i Y, ovu.uuv 3 iKAPUK 52,940 I,Z*U.ULM i 21CIRACAS 39,8 7,4w, ! HUAYA 24,515 i IOU-uutm I usu 31,492 1 l,Zbu,Uuq 4 CIGANJUR 500:'uuu M gG U AMA& L9,314 11-ili ou fw, 3. 5,DDQ,000 3. Gnc.I Peumbunm 174,494 6i 5,MOgq 9 Mak-r .LW,DM I "jK%JWL. 29.237 f W,UU,4 i KASXK 29,m t /W.Viq ZI 10MANU, 36,5B 1,2 US% 42,606 1,7.bo,wq A 1) IAKA 1 45'"ul i IANJUNG LiUREN LrARA 2&21i ,w,OUq i13 1 PINANG I IZ816 L - .4 UROGOLSELKr-AN- 1 47,2881 _.-LAMBAK BMEU- 34,34i I,ZW,VA4 LirINA44U MtLAYU 40,065 1,250 31WIJAYAKUSUMA 4. M 6,TANjUNGDtJRENb=.AlA 22,369 I 75,J*U 71 1. I-- k%Utmq zl'utu- -!S M&m 2 N" PANLiPRAPATAN 23,719 (50,WD 4. 'irstabom 226,262 250,0001 3 BANGKA 22,163 IIKALLANYAR 28,M 'WIMM i I LhUbK 250.OEXA ;P' I, ziuvxi u t fou'umv Ij41 MUNJUL 25O.UE OW,WLI I1'IBAMSUAPUS 13, 44 ZOU.ULM Itu'537 4, 5, 2,10u"a f 1W.UMN IibiL 10,339 250.wq I MANcrjARAi 41,244i 1,250,0M 51JEMBATAN BESI 27,576 i (W.904 i 171 FONOOK KANGON 2 butul UVFJ 43, 1 i,zw,uuu O,ANUM jj,jao i'Zou'uuta I I 3 MLN TENU UALAM 49,799 1250,900 __rMMtIAEAN UMA 20.256 tQ0,0001 ;1.5 Kotimadys Jakaft Utart IAA9 271 2611% i,zou,uvu 3!TAMBORA 13,280 Zbu,QUCI if. i Kelapa G 97,11 31 3 y1rL&WAN 3 IA" l,ZbU,uukM ,I llrbufflm _u i 6- -Ciludak 115,6461 C 3,500,ODD III ZlKw-kpA uAuuwj timux I 40,01JI I L LLUAY, LSULUb LY ---- 7M-,= 5 .Keb.. NF.R 148,M 61 4,Z3%UUUI 1 JjKtLAFA(,AULN(jBAKAI; z7,z3t 1 W,2 M R 5,a 11 bu, i I KEHON JLKUK 37,202 I.W.W.Uuto 1 I I I - I ... T_poj AN Z-41bLq w,uuu 2lKEVOYWIJ-rARA 29.064 1w,vtm 2. lpadmmtm I I . . . 34,73ui llzwlv Z7,,W4 50.0001 , IIANCOL I 3, 16L I *w.UUUj 4SUKABUNUSELATAN 20, 5WOQq II ZIPADENIANGANBARAT 637,593 I.Zbu.vjLq 7- P 4, 5,000,mu ISSIU41 - 167,, 31FADEN 1,250.UUUI 52 .. 7 1,250,1710 b KtLArA L)UA 1_ Ow,0001 ! - I .2:FLAUUNAN I :3. I anjmg rnok 274.;54 57 1). I A." ban 58,1481 5 I.MUUUN - I I I ANJUNU PRIUIL 27,255 t 114wl i tANGKI 11,7.241 Z*ULXAV Z; PAPAN 26,944 1 - fw,uLM 2 i KEAGITNOAN I 13AWANO 59,03Q 1 1.Zbu.Uvq I 1^1701 MKUT 12,4321 zu'u'umv 4,bVNILKJAYA i 5, JD I I,Zbu.UUUI 29,1131 100,000 4, TA 6"Os 1,250.uuul 2 Pt FUKANGAN SELA I-AN I*u,uvu 3 NDOWn 49,156 1 1,2w. 3 ULUJAMI 31,0771 1,zw i 4 PErUKANQAN UTAKA jb, fl W O M TP.1m.-h 157,669 51 4 Cili.d.& I I JATI PULE) J , i ,4 - I 47,41Z l,zw,vVA 1:04,!N77991 )TA SAMBU UTARA 26,469 75"'u"', :5EMPERDAMAI 60,374 1.zbu. I ; MA I./*U.tjuu j SLIPI 5 - nMUR -27,359 1W.Vuq 2 fou't 53% JOVIV44 4;bVKA PUKA Z4,711 tbu, 3KAREr 21,1191 5DO, i 75u,uuq 4 flUN I UK 250,000 f D. KCM 125,1961 611 3 I 91,1221 .4 2,750,OW MM UrARA Jbv l t W,VW4 .3. ranlannlm 161,9% 4 4,13MOMI 37,10ZI llzwl L:b;mRugmqa- ZZ,421 ] I ,=.ULM 1, PANJARINGAN I,zw.uuq 2 PtllxjVAN sonm 3,JOGLO 22,3531 I *uu.uuqI j KXANtA I PtLA Ouu,uvu 4, KtMuANuAN uTARA 21,036 b 3!KAPUMMUA] ZOU.ULM 4 UUNUN(J 15,7031 wo,wo - TNIMM A ELAMN 07- bOU.ODCI . 41PLUIT i 1,250.= 6 KEMBAMAN Stj_Al 14- ZbO.Wq I 1.2 Kotamdyx J.k.na P-.t 1- 927,3711 33 16. Koi 161-'74&1 51 $1,144i 4. Z.M,000 1. 4 Kotmm.dya Jakarta r.", 1- ploom i6A 35-,6641 -T,25um I CIDENG WO.DVO 1. MatraMan 146,775 5: 4.750,00% 2: F. 2 PETOJU$ELATAN 21.3301 - - SM.UUU --- I 21,2621 3,RAWABADAKSELAIAN Z4,J-1 W,= 16,4211 -2 PAL MhKILM 19,8781 DOC 4, TUGU UTAKA 4b./UYI 1,dbu, 4 FtlUjU V !AKA 21,6401 buu,c jJ.4U11 I'ZO ATAN 15.4961 500, 4 U FAN KAYU SELATAN 33,2961 2. S...h B 4. 5 UTAN KAYU tTrARA 39,1321 i ODC -R-,.'glZa. TA 51lis'N" I,Zbu,uuu I I 2 FAbAX BAKU boo, r-ra negm 256,4911 7: 6,7WM JUMLAH fbu,Uw I KAMFUN(j MELAYU_ 27 0501 75T= Pmd 3 BIDARA CINA j. K.m.y.,an 154,241 _YB"m __ TIU 44.1"i 1.zbu,= 1. 1 KOWMadya Jakarta Selatan f, i UUNUNU bAMAKI SFLA IAN 1 26,8931 750, __TrMMT9GlMSAR_UTAlCV 23,-4W -75T= I.z Kotamadya Jakarta Pusat r 247-,945; 40i 36,000= 22,819, ------7507= 6,CIPINANU SESAR 11 and r 1,1 9 9-,47 2r -4 9 i- --cC, 2 5 T M 30,M] I,Zbu. __T_O 11301111 1.25Dw L.Rummadyajakarta limurP i 1,675,771f b ____CTARTANJXNU_ Lorlomm 39,0(A 1,250,000 3. F.I. (;.d..g 238X7i 6 6,250,000 I &AYU P 5O.D821 1,2bu,m ------Toiir 5.9BT,115120 89,DD3, 4 22WA -4 513351 1,25u,= t KWITAN(j 17,8ZI! 45.493i __T= M, _lI.JAWABARAT 2 22.-Y" 750.OOC__TT._r'FW p.t- Ikk..i 1- O"50, KENARI 14,799 i 3 PASEBAN 27,0021 KRG- 1. ;T..b.n HUNGUK ^39v 7bUUUU 6 45.-Zbl UAMUR 19,DUZI OW.Ow T.-CF.P. .. t, 74439, -y- fa"m 4K,...t J.ti 171,443 ---- TIMFKAR5AFJ 19,062! buulom IC EMPAKA PUTHi HAMA I 31,317 i7wow I KRAMAT)ATT__ V,V421 1 2 LE:MFArA FUUH TIMUR 13,4151 ------750,=250.= 'ALL OANU 16 5'j _V, 1: 115M.000 3RAWASARJ 24,1071 H 27,6471 ibu,DOC WANASARI Z7, 4u; fw.UuO 4 16.12T I 5 NAU 71,997i 4 _f;l 40,194 7 2 W, 03 q U L IJ A Y A 16,6401 IKLbUN blKlH ILILITAN 41.1211 l.ZOU, / Uuuu 3 CIKIMI ------2M-,OW 37 s., Reb. 104,908 41 3 I'SUKARAYA 4 FLUANWAAN 30,516i I PEKAYON 33.236i VuKARANUKOTA 13. 631 250.UQU 1 RI 2&821 7 kkLANUAbIM 21 631 fbu,uuu 7 T.nah Ab..g i WI"f 5 4 19.61 1 i IKAMPUINU BALI 201411 4 GEDORG- 26,240i ih llr:llllll KIN 28.315 i I bu,uuu -m .633, C,,i3N M, 39,142 _f, 2 182,457 6 . 2 MEKARMUK-n 9313 Z50.000 MOM N 30,98C 46 4 1,250,uu 3 SIMPANUAN 9.0481 -- IURE F I tNUSIN -- 73-.5 70 lbu.000 14 G681 ZSD.= 3 FeNurum[NGAN 44.622' 35,429' 2 1.000,000 4 s3wwo I BABELAN KOTA______WM ------50TOOO I iv K -u i AKUNOTIMUR 2KAMPUNG RAWA 35,882 WA IbKAIL 37.974 1,250,Wo Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 28 PRC 1 5 M 11,K IMP luan U, N KELURA aH 7, I WIV IrAL'UMBUNSARI M.7721 1 250. i ZIPASIK _706r-7 -- 5ww 11,20611 250,000 1 I JNUUAYJAII I lu.8 2 250,00( AIUAYA 11.206i 250,000 ------33;3" 5! 1,250, 4, KARAWANGWETAN 21, 2 OD-MO I -fR-ou-w--9v-.-IQ0 lt&AK 1I 25U.UUCIz5u, 5 i KAFLAWANUIkULUN IT 1140,15 -,W,Mo 12!NANqGEWMU------9,W, -61mumw- IT-3or- -500-100 3 PAKAINSARI UASARJ -- 2TM3 i 5oo,ow A SA 41CIRJUNU 31CII51NONC, i Rgd- 3KO i 1,KEUASDENG 2; REGASD -NJUANG I 46,27 I IIkUIAHATU- 13,501 SIAKAJAYA Z7,3 tw'uQQ FAWILARAN 4 Jmm. iliCIOMAS ------r-350 ltpuc .i sd.u. - J 7 i 4,5wOOG IJAKA bAMPURNA i 52,1 1 KA i 37,626 12.JCi- 7,6541 11 25 KAMULYA ZU,4611 5Q01WJ 1 111SENUUNUAN- 7,6541 i 25LO 4 kKUAMULYA 14,27 i 5 21, M simpy. 13,662 6 I IWTA 6 WMA 16 IJUSAL.AK 12,8451 250,UUCI 1 2 LEMAHABWG 7 ZiBAKTUAYA-- 47,056F- 1'zw.uuq i -fMk KAKJAYA 7 T.I.kis. 3Bk- 41SU FLYA I&N J 1 J-%624 JKALJHA U 2.p N"AMINAN b[SUKAMAJU 33,6741 l.z5u.uoq S. VJRi 3 B UVINUMtN I tNU I IKANTUN KERJA tKUAHAYU 92, 250,221 II IL)bF'UK 29,126F I 75U,UM 1 13SPANJANuJAYA 24,31Z 1 21RAMMAPAN JAYA -7059 5ou Om II. 6 p 7 BUJUNUKAWALUMIJU 69,27 1,250.0 iPANG P. MJAYA 750,00C 4 UKADAMAI -47B--m, Gb"g 1 5 5 1 i 2 Bi I UNUJAYA I 48,418FFI-51IF-- 51 rlznm2wl= 3 P AN i 14 517 250 000 -:- -15T.= 4 2TAKUALAM 3. Cipma IK-MA MMI -,W,Uuv 16.1 Cm- I uni FAT 2 LIABAINUI hNUAR '3'440 I'M= i I I ru(ju StLATAN 2 CIREUNDEU i c3 NAWAR kSARU ILLUNFUl-UNt, 5LZ" Li Pl ,ANOAN 1,944 LIBUKUY UNV 16,636 W0.000 ')A ,I LbAKI 4j"KA4A 22.052! 500,000 3 JA ItiKKAA4AT 2 051 750,000 I MS101 klTIAM 20,2421- i 7. P. M,7 -kr 16,9501 i 4U811 1,2M=, 31JAMUMV- 14.036i ------MOT ------75TUM Z4,3 4Z 91 1 2W ULIU 37CIMPAEUM i IJALJNU OltIAKJAMUKTI TMEKARSARI S. J.M. 33,963i 31 750.UM --- ,.3-TTSffZUNUNUb dak A- JA;mm 9, LISA nmumi 13.622i zso-,= L'IL)KAN ,J-UWN- 4!lVNUV&AKbN 20.; D-.Za 500,00( 2 Fl..51)AN LU,4871 kV-" 7,971 LtJ &M3f l5u= I KE 2 CURUG KULON 3,8511 25UOM 3cKA 7. P.- lAkiAN UNti 25u'um tum 2 LOPAN T 3 UNYUR GSAWAH 4 LIfiANUU 2, C'l- 31,761' 0 I IDAYEUH 250,000 7 I 5 hhKANU I 1 2 . Bp.g d. -TrID-1-T i 1 13,19 1; 250.00( 7 LON I AK BAKU Z!kKIUJAYA 9-90ii 25TOM W'SUMUKyhLUN(J YUNG 9 6271 L LI uiuu 8'2 w bu'000 'NU PUNVOK TERONQ z U I tuKhull ZbO.00V 3 PU IVAIJUK i MUKA 4 3:Bhjl 26.399i 750,00( I ANY -41.0 1 PA ALANJA-n LAALA 5"00 -2-t-ANDUC- 8.740i - -26a.-OOC -250-OW 6. 3t IANSARI Mr, btLA IAN zsnm 7-999i --- 2sno fEENI) BARAT -- fTLA) -- 2SO.MC 7-P. ,MK JAYA N P Page 29 Indonesia:Urban Poverty Project:PAD PKCFIINSI, U.-filT. )U&Mm-& . I jumck. K-...tw KtLUKAHA'q P-nd.dk, KOI. tiantuan KELURARAN 10.3601 -- 250"um 1 JIUWUNU JAYA ------m-Im Ovu, K.Jaks- I 19,93 AKSAN I zbo,m 2 KEShNVEN 8,487 i J,SUKAPURA -T---Wou P... ic 60,101 6 81,2521 1 1KUNCIF-" IZB- 3 750,OW i 1,4331 LINLKUKLW 7.785 250.00q j I.JAUASATRU Zbo,OUQI 9,4871 I 250,000 - M DhVLARAF'INANG -8,810 1 9,538 3 c 7,992 INAINO 1 10,017 7 zw,um 3,1W /*U.Uuu Ipp ANGAN 7,!,39 3 C M GN 9,1811 250.000 NUNGUANGAN UTARAI, 13,090 U. 13 Kab.patm 112 37,2MOoq -- TT.MDTRG-- 8,9081 11. lcip.,.y 7 SEPUR 9,723, zzi,uuu I U Ka-ni Tentah RI 250,wq & BABAKAN IIKARANrj-nMUR 2 TI- 2 ISAIRUIMAAIFIH 7,716 2*0,um 9 P.-XNAtLAfiAN ilbbul zw,uuu ZIKARANUMULYA -- TM, --- M DANG 12,897 z5u.wq BAHAR IM3 25 1 4 GUNUNGLEUITK 31FUNDOK U'Viq I 9 44i zou.VuLq Ek.ZOTim.r 63,o7a I cr -"wam 4!pONDOKPUCUW- 13,901 zbu,ouq I 1 3 btKANUMbKAR 8'm Zw.uLm SLANG 23 7861 9,.,z MOM47-- ,-6,MANGGMUHARJA 9 2bu, ; w - 336 ITI bumut"AtuI 10,995 bu.24 --.- KXTUEKRM L4,LL41 ZZU,UW -- 3QM 7 2 250,WD 14,196 glq i 2. Mmjmlsya TM- 25 250, 4-B.V, ut." 95,4981 7 ZIZ5010013 JLAKANUAN UIAKA i 16,L62 10,73-6 1 T?.ljALGUNDlJ. 19,7711 I 13-79 12,213 250, 2 11,0191 250,000 KEREU 6,466 i 4iBIRU 250, _7MULuff- 1 ;J,431 525U.UuLjr, 3,buKAMAJ -- CHF 1 13,5201 ZOU'UUU 17 CIPADU JAYA lu'aw r zMUMT-73' i i-ILUAK' 10,ml 250,000 II a TPADAULUN ;dw. 0 I-IMAtti-AX I zbu,u22 Uri I 53,2S4 5 LOKANJERUK --- Trw z JANAI-ibAKU i 16,950 f Suo,ow bpju 1 8,.,63 250 1 i : 13,M I 01 Selatsn 35,UUIj "OW. YAR 1 -,- I -' AUNUWWAN I 7,Y62 HARAT bAlUlUL15 . I 3 SELMWANGTAVA i 15,471 3 zou,uw I 4 SELACAU 9,235 250.UUUI 4 CIPAKU Z;,432 i 250,000 1. 10 Kabpam lndmms" I 101,229 11 21750,OM I -rZ,426 -L-,OAM 4. iPaCet i 12,426 1 25 V 1 MARLTYTJ ZbO.0oul 01, ZZ*5Ou.. 0-M 2. H.,.q-fis 91ml 1 1 256,OM 5. Pmh 11 9,9481 1 2:50.a :FlLll'AllU T7,752i 6i Z,00(,000 01-MAtt bAXhAL 1614"I z I Z KhL)UNliBADAK 24,915i ts,3:uw zw 4 CIPEDES I uu 7301 4 KEE)UMIWAKINUIN 2: 6 Ciml.n 34 , SU rADANMI 7,93,! 4. f.dm..y. 16,3731 7.1 6 CIBADAK 11,257 ...... I I LZ&lAttMr-%AX 11.9 928,2181 71, &7 4yzl 4 _I 24,5341 fbu,ow 25 Ci -7-BARmum- I 'A 6. i "24i .1 2 CILILIN LMUKUL 19,139i .0 UDU 14,4791 250, -"w 112,385i 6,--T73uw YA15 I I I FASIR JAYA 21,746 I IIKAKANIIAMPbLKIDUL 9,618 250,0 ZIATAKE 17,5471 i ! 21.250i 3. Ostbar-Z &0231 11 ATIBAKANQ BARU I 'AYAtW 19,0001 i MAN[S JM 13.020! K..d le, j 1 25 W 500,000 WE7AN 1 25 2w,000 It. tl K.b.p.tm Sbang/- 13F,463 M 4,750, 1. P--.km 19.2b3 21 750,000 4 CIPONDOH 15,4W 500,0(M !1 1 MULYASARI 9,545 ---- FOR19TFCkWXD MRX-- 1.501 I 250,000 10,723 9,706T 25o,wo 9.01j 2. f ft.k..&Sorm 20,9941 I 7-CIPONDOH INDAH 10,4691 I i rUSA&AKA I V 12,4631 25 'FUhAF.AJAYA 2bo, 14,3081 250,000 T-r,T.-d-.z ------T7;5 , - i /aU,DW I SUD;,MA; BARAT 9.411, 40v,uuv 3. 250 bLLAIAN JU.436 4 2, : :T WILAN UTARA Wu, 4 SUMMARA JAYA 12,872 8,370 1 2 500,0 -T-9 13.025 Z50,000 3 BALEEND 0 FARUNU SERAD 10,381 7 TAJUR WU 5. O... 51 1 IISUKAMANDIJAYA 20,346 21C SEMUIRANG ?A(,ERAN 31CIASEM I LNGAIJ in,41j"b -21-01 21 9!716i 4 ICLASEM BARU 250-.m 10" (9 -- Tusul 9 k,", 2 41 4 BXTUTEPETC- O'y4b, e.. !50-.ng 73,041 51 -I M-,M I I uGADuW 15,368 5OTM T§vl -MD.W 21SOKLAI BIRU WETAN CINUNUK -- Fumx- 10383 SEEERDUNG-- - 11,839: 10,971 - 2w.000 214.285 m i 58,168i 4 1.5wma P.-:1 y 11 47.792i 1: NAH 107.059i !)UU I rESAMBI 10.055i - 2 bu:w 3 DKAJAT 2 .71 T241 s 4-CIM EJAYA -- T-44q- 250-,DDO 4'bUNYAKA'jl 35,3121 -- TZERM 5=1-1911KIVAN- 61LI 250,0 12 3 3!48bl I PMUK -- Tr62T- 25CFOOO 3. -5MMO 2:KALUA(j KATIMUNG- Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 30 p PRoPTNST.-D--ffTrlC"---.t -1 V.u 11, K....tan, XH KELUKAHAN KtLUKAH" 1-Ye-naWuki-KU I tiantuar 1 5511 1366.W T--Band..& Wtm 37,507 2 1,000,M -fl ' .,g. -- T'CIMPTM EKAR g,00 I SARI 28,809 i 750.00( i 28,7521 i 2 CIBURUY II,-,471 250,OW 696 ztu'uut j I A(jUUAFU -1 9,1231 Z U,uuu 17,621116,424 1 500, D KhKIAJAYA i 7j790 250.0(X -;O"M 2; KEBON PIMNO -T4-,60 26r,W-z.h.yu 75.239 41 2,OM,00 31MEELDEKA 546 i 250,M 1 9,487 250,0 IbUr,AMhNAK 16,9451 1 500,000 -I UAVA&AN C" S 13V 750,000 W-M g J(.k, -- 52.557 UxtiEULIS 11,87i JUMLAH ----- TStJKALLJYlJ F-ddk 1Kel. i BantuTn 7,648 I BANJARAN WETAN 13,ju5l T--Zsnm 4 ClUAL)UNU 2 I 9, / ,uw I Hokasi r 6,--- 3.ClAPUS i Y,J..f I 1 250,000 nyi.g Kid.] i 71, Yj 5 Bekasi I I 1CICAVAS 13,3(01 I 2 Dy hk.lt 51.1 ! W5w,000 1 30,50010uq T-CA-lZGKUAjqUWhlAN lu, zbu, i -I !JISUrA U I 113601 -i Z LAIIUKUANL. KULUN 13,7131 i 500.000 14iSUKAPAL)A 1 15,258 I"dDuuu 12,JJ4 42,7011 291 8,150, I I 250,000 =ugp ,en zwang 5,25u,ou IVAYbU ULQI 15,816i I # 749 415 13,250,Wq i --- TTCIC?amum 73,Wly 5 KOtiMadya TwWntng7 23iAFjU.. 8,138f 1 1 M,000 ------Rm I 250,M11111.10maoupaien incremayu -- Z75UZM w,uw 21 B"AKAN S(JRABAVA---,--T4,7W 1 25 11 =r I - 3 KEHON JAYA" - I I 24 C'-- y.. 49 1,250,000 csEJECAPURA I SW,UL-Allll.lziKaoupatenBandiuN -- 1,4Z3,5151112 37,250,UUQI F-PADASUKX- 1.1B, Lt o ri 12,4541 1 250,00(11111.14 Kolamaaya tSaMung r 1.4zbl Z,L(lJhUNYfNlj 20,Z5 . I - 3 CIMENYAN 3'slill 250,000 12.1gt .. agg.1 1,750,ODIIF------To-gF- I 3.229.4Z 4 L113UKIAL 8,4031 Zt-U,UUOl IIKACAPIRIKG zw,uuta I I 14,933 20 2-311N.golmg- Z9,538( Zi zu, J UUMUKUH 1 14,246 49,250, rANUALLNGAN 15,3;L -M"w ! 14,1 ii-E I -4 . i 65'awl 7 F -- p7som -AH I TKE901rMDANC, 9,0515 9- 19,1014 21 500,6m 6181NONU 14,254 luMAKJu Y 12 [ I 2tV 2TNZA.P,.h 9,86T I f MMO --- 7,ZAMOTC-- 9,5521 __LNtAKI,AIAYA 9,867 1 2_ 1 62,170 61 D3iRt 21 500,000 PALEDANG 7,500 8,6921 11 250 1 6 ONUM)ANG 8,6921 1 250. 2 T IALUAK 3 MALAOAR !i uo I :vuta I 11PENYANUMNUAN 1 7. 294M.'p-h 57,7931 4 ; t,Z50,000 3; FURANWA 14,733 I..:ULN4 I I ME 21,1471 7 *w,uuu 6,Z:IJAL.RA 9,6451 P IXAKUAAb "'., 8,7071 1 M,000 2sulaw L EFIRI 8.707 250,000 3LAC,ADAR 10.012 . 250,QW 14.; "! C N73 4 RAHAYU I 12,411- --- Zsnm K 7,962 250 5. ISO' 10,159 11 UIA I LUL 8,6 %OJA 3D K.12P..g 49,001 j 5 1 ,-%,000 3 ANLUL lf),U64 IYAlAkAN(j 8,33 4iC]GEROLENG I 000 2LILAIMPEN1 LSEWU 1 NUAUIJAN M501 2M-,CW 6,PASIRLUYU- SUKANHM iM46i :ebv,uuu o.t.. BRtm.e 1- 1 66,0431- 41 -1,06,W LINMIN 45 kik- 58,019i LiKA &AbhFUHAN 11,4721 4 ilsmooo KANU ALNYAR 9,6761 IKARANUASEM 500.000 IM AL &.-AN 25,076i LU,1241 I . 13,JZ9 iKAUMAN 11,4301 25D,UUQ 2150JUNULOA 13.261 250.000 4 KARA5AK I 250,QOQUT--' 4 22,397i -- 30T= 4 EUUN'j 9 92 250,GUG LALY.EK &ULON 9754 Z ,WU El bfjAi 69, 4 1 F..W-z 1- 215,755[ 171 5,750,000 P-M..j 32 P.,o.p..g 39,196, 4i Z BABAKANASIH 14,278 i 250,004 i L FELUIAN 22,204 1 500,000 16.111i M'O-,Cw 3; KOPO ig,146, - - NtiKA 10,3141 ZbU. 9.6927------250-,CW - - 15,289[ i 5 15,185 i I 5onm -TsUGTRWMUU- 25nm 4 ,A UWANlil 9.0301 25UOW T7-Mimloa Kid.i 18,52,5[ 1 1 TBOTOITGRAMN- 9,776 i YLttUN LFUA 18,5251 12. T.... 37,285! 31 1,000,000 8.510i i I - 7 - ZSU-= Is. B.b.k Cipi, 64,1801 S! IBABAKAN liKABUNAN 34 P. gp-k ------frr7y--T-- T55-.w --- 4tVNbAKI 10.712 1 ',VAKU Y U U 1AKA JT 9,7911 i 250,GGO 4i 7,6181 47,796i r3wlr- "", --- qTBlF- 2m.uuO tO,7391 1 250-.= 19. B.od..g K.1- 55,1C 3jMOGA 1. N.k.- OOTM I UBUNIU ITSOLA 4 KUN(,PKIN(, 23.430t (50'am 2 CUEFAH 3417 500, 4jWA 7:1146111 605 250. 3 CIGON EWAK KALER ll,,6407241 251: i4. Rnd.do.gk.1 --- 25,49512 756,GM 23.335i 750,OGO --- 4-GEMPoL SARI 250 tiRANoUDONGKAL- 4 SARIJADI 9,424 D,QM 20 Cm.d., 64,3771 4 1 1,46ffw 14,w 1 1 ZDU.UtA Z U,uuu WIX11 1, IURWUSAKI 7,613 f 250,GUC AN IAPANI [hNlAM 9 469 buu,uut 21pupwo 17.046 SUCFM buv,uuu 4 S A A j6l A.P.1g. 21. A,u.-ik 37,6W 3 KI 1 --- ,-MX KULON 13,2051 Zb A'l N 20.049i 5 ---- 7-rMRUKLUWkJNt, 4 PAMOYANAN 22. Uj 2; 60i 2 5 SUKA I :AUIWLKNA T-X.-d,T 2 D.k.ht.,i 2W,00 25U= KATON 4 A SDD-= --- Flix 3K ... t 7.889i 25TOM 3- -ruif.-p --2 -- 7-qow - 4-0 UK LUN 9.425 2MEJASEM -IR,650 2 MulARMAN WETAN 9-121 2 50= L Page 31 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD PRUP 5" U-b 11'K-.At-, kML H rmuri JUMLAH KtLURAHAN j F-ddkl Kel. 9V=n N 1". lItLU- N MP-; 7.D 9'1)14 1 25 41,652 41 '-'w4 20' ULLNUONO 10,6111 50 6. 'M.M.wi ---24,3UI 21 00,000 S. J.. 5.331 I[ I VKUPUF, 7---Zsnw KtjttAN LOR 5,331 z.,u I MAKtiASAKI I I.J24I 250,000 I ! 30,3321 9 Z'2 ;9. B..y....ik i 67.7-5 71 1.7 7 L,bskm 7,795 11 m I1, MltbKhy 12,196! 1 250.00DJ I VTkm-ANSAlu- Y.6j I I I I KA j2: rtUALANUAN 7,7471 I - I It 3jSROND0LXnO 1zlym -- 2. gangsfi 5WAM j4;SUMURBOTO Eil %5ALffiAr6 ;NZ,, wETAN j 12,950 I I BANOS RI 871 1 250 i5 IPADANG SARI- '3 21W haN [11.5 K.b.p.t- B b. 1 120,"4 121 3.000,0W - 1. '71119 xi[MC lrjAyIYJU N U 8,41 AIR 250. 73,379! 61 21OW10001 14.>97 2SEKUKQ I0'89qF---T-----2w0m 311AMOU 8,6291 1 250 IiP= ------I !11 ;LAMON(jAN 2.B 4. .h... bAJU 10, -2LI 41MUKTIHA IUDUL 23 21 KALIERANG IJ KECAPI 1 250, uuKuhl Ulu 2b uluuu 2NCABlUr- l'bJ41 I I 61PEOURUNGAN 8,48z I zw'utm j. W.."An 9,741 1 111.143 .k 9,632 I KLAMPUK 25000 )NG LOR 250 lilltNU"AKI 9,632 2 PtNAN I UNAN 11,133 I i 1 111.12 KA 39,729 31 1,000, 112.11 211 481 1, Z50, 4. J.tib.,-g i 3 IU,578 1 3, 43 .'Wu 10,D-7W -i T7: WFIBARANG KIDUL ANUCEN glq ! ZIPETUMPON 5" I i II 1 JIbAMYANVA 7 723 H.I.k..b. 64111 1 mlooo 2. w I IltIANJAKAIMA zw,wV , I-MM, Ij IG.Y. . 19,1721 Z-- 04 11 iGAYA 15 795 9,41D 250,000 5 0 250,000 2:KE-FANC,GUNGAN 9,762 250, p i TIM Kb.pt- Sm- i aA47 I . 80561 1 It: I Kju I HAWE PROPINSI, D THTK--t-S--ATY-&-p&-W-0-RgAQ11 71,216 2,000,M12, A bmwa 20,3551 2 1 Fmd.dk KOI. I BantuaH I .Pekalongan B""'t 2V94 750,000 1 1 FANJANG zoul I I I MEL)UNU IJ,L-JU zw,wu 2 Ku 12,6011 zbul 2 PODOSUGM &910 250,000 1 1 111.1 KaOupaten K-endeJ BENDAN 9,274 zwuuu 4 -I'bUU,LULq J. 1112 LOU, 111,3 KaDU D'fW'uuL4 k.lo.g. IPI MA Kabupaten 6401 Kabupaten Bmbes r lbl.ets1l 15 4,000'amuuu.mm lv' m 1. AZ...Iy. Kotamadya Pekalongan 71,21C)i al 2'uu0'QVq J KICA JUN LUK IL367 I!LtLXJ& 7,597 I zou. U KoMmadya Tegal 139'Zill 500.0m If.a K.10upaten E31cra 40,5901 31 1,000,00q 7 9171 Tr---EWW 1 1 5UV 11I.-J Kabupatm Patt r Its.ml 2 wo.ULM %T'Y-Mg%M 7,9171 E7711MILIOWINANUILIN ow. 111.10 Kabupaten Kudus r 111.111 - -- i Qdw 1"419 Ii 111.14 M ,'.len 'I..l 1,000'm W.U1541 4 1.000,01Y jlll.14 tamadyaSa 111.7 Kt ... dy. Tn.1 j 139,217 10; 34M.000 4. Sid... a lu'lbu'u 1. Tnal Sdatan ^i7bi A; 75U,UUU I : I,uzl Z U'uvu Z!) otal Q1,250,00( 57K.to.adya Sem.r-g 659,1091 57 16,750, 2. M-Zd... 500,000 1. ut.. 7 2-100,00011IV. DTND-GVXRAXTX- zou'uw I. tSAN 18,7341 5w,0001 Iv.1 2NALIUANUSA 10.026! -- 2WRWVSAXJ Z." 1. Knfiba-ng NUAN reg.1 -r-, 40,931[ kYSARI I MiN I A QhN 16,314, - -sw(m JLQR 2SLEROK Z.V,wu IDUKAN 7.9131 250.UUL§ L K.kp ------17xrl -I 7-79 Im j KkJAMIJUN RN"NI ------5m 221 FHARGOM 250.000 I . 2 KAR(jU 10 127! 1 4Tn.1 B ... t 1 48,4561 49,4731 41 1,250, IE(jALSARI 750.0W 250, I4.9j3I 250,000 2 gul; ISIG-Aw 9,750[ 250, 3, Gi 16,2291 2i 30 3 PEKALIMAN i GINN 4-MLAIIUAKU 2:JATTMULYU- 7.9J6 1.3 -. 5.1 I'W000 L J.P.. J. .a 4. S-tol. ------= i I I 250,01)( --- l -IEPON- 10.2481 L. C.P. 30-1A21 r---7SWW 3 (ARAN _I 1,606i 39,9941 4, IBALUN 12,0t5l ---- z5nw 4, KEM JAN'j ARU 18,8331 rz ICEPU i 19,327' t 5 , 1 KAN(i AYU 6, KROBOICAN 143 II 1.9 K.b.p.t.. P.ta 1- DRONO 16,764 T-T .tl I NIIJU KIU 9,6401 V.2K.b.p.t- R.m.17f= 1. B..g..t.pa. 5w uuu -gkil 10,047! -1-J---H6,0-06 MAN ------I IRANUKIL 2 EiA FU bup.ten Kdus 1- )5ARI 11.441 K-H.. LK.i-..g. 2 PU VYMI( 7-5 3 NGAJAN 2. B- --- GMDANQMANIS 250,0U0 47,4014 i 4 I I'z5u, 22-M441 2! Z 18,9661 ll- SW606 -T-uo - zou LSARI 15,333 [tu 8, K.d- 7. T-b.] = p 8,815 JEIF-- IANG- 6 I LO 13 i 250-'Myo FFOlu- 9.043 - 25T.00D Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Pige 32 b-I U-U II, 11, mm mm, 3UMLAM N l,1MUdUk KELURAMA Ftnmwuxi Kel., f.W.UKAHAN FCWUCLuki Kill.! 3. r.k..l ... n L4,1111 L[ zsa OODJ 1 5,5Z7 L u 14JII 2[WUIKbJU 21 -L w viu 23.138 1 37,418 41 1100010001 3 9,435 11 250,0001 2 13AUSAbRAN L 9,4J3 ; 250, I 5UMVZt- IUNU Izz3J I I I 2.CANUEN I u >. hfis 2 j 42A% jUUWUNtiAN J 2 -%JNUOSAJU 7,942 1 250, 13,OD61 I zbu,uuu i DUAGUNG 10,042 iNza-p-la-k -,I - 14,07rr--l I NUAMM-NN K.t..& Mojokerto 37,07,4 41 1,000.0001 i i2 NGTOFRAJAN "VI zou, IJ7rI ", a n 2B--uO1 2 750,000 f 1.71TIRANWAN i lu.m I FUNLUbAKI --- n,72 T Krawn 17,4791 2; 1 9,029 2 TRIMUR11 16, TPhItFUN 1 7,9 11 2"KAD)FAILN i 9,5561 17,141 11 IISALbNLibAlU 8,591 250,00C I WOKUKRUMO 3 NUUNU 1 Z1]`"KJ:I I; GWARU ;Mo OEM II i 13 bw zw:uuta 1V.3 mad Sumbaya 1,775,020 92 ltismagi B:b IV 31J ;d0U,UM* 11. 7JAM 7 4,51 z*u,= i I1 44,712 III[ILIDAki ULFJN 9,347 9- Uondoku...S. 2I SRICADING 9,311 - IILONTAR L4,bbl I zwuuq It"AN I 14, J I I I 11,641 1 250,0011 2 iKLNREK I 1-111. i bm! 39'm 3 1 1 y"M LY 1 zw.uvA iiI i K.AKANu FMANG TMJIMU 0 11,641 ZZ)u'uuu 3MMANUAN I -8,495 1 i I I I tKEBRAON 15,905 50B.00CR 13,Kmtk 250,0411) 10. Kotag 1 z5Jm 31 1J1KhL)UKU5 15,585 V,uVO 250,00E) hPRENGGAN .um I 50010M ly.3iKab.p tm Umu.g Kd.1 21PUIMAYAN ZWOOC 3. [Wiyng 250,0001750,OWI MA16 91 i 750, 'M 11HAIMIAN 1 250, won.man 744 MOOD 1 2 1virm I I KEF'kK 9,744 ZW,UW II.jM&utnjmm 37 750 3 J TSO M J AIA I 1TRYOD1Nn9G1&Cr-- 250,OOC MANI KMrKUN I I,W I z u i 50 MINI& V zw.uwl 2 !UA 1" TMUCWM KALI KENDAL 1GUNLINUSARI 12,ulf 12, I 15 3.! S..... z I U&utt KUMN(I 14.775, im ;;KUSUMXN ------77" ; -2 9,555 250, .2 KEPAFAKAN 10,662 1 25D,001) 52,3Wi 47--, I 10.661 13.iW.,.b,.j- 1 28,788f 31 7so %97---,TrMWXEXqKk.KIU I iWIROURAJAN 9,4321 i 21JEMUIRU'XUNUSAIU 10,9301 Ow,=Il 37 T. S lu -- TF ZnN 2 PATANUPULUrt" a..'a I RLJE) 9,1601 250. I 4,96> 1 j,FAKUNLhN H.28L 250,00C 1 & NZ..e. T"mb.Ih.,J. 33-397 4 -g 250.01501 __I. rAMrUNII I KA 12.135 2: lAkiUNAN O..Y.t 7. Sipt.S.. 7,756 1 250,000 3 WAFUNGISOTO I 8,447[ V.Y."gan 1;KEPEK I 7,756 ZMuLlu 4 MUJA-MUJU lujuzl i "'Ayu,"'AN I 2-50 I1Z: Kh I IN rVTG R!, 9JG g,.. Kingkasan: Ut YOGYAKAK IA 31 T T75 I ung 38,735! 1.000,0001 M PiNSi, D.ti ii, Ka.at,,rl, NU-ILH------LIRUNGKUr 9. 1F.I,Y.. 7,74% - I 250,000 KELURAHAN i P-ddk I Kel.. Ban NfiBARUr. 10,606 25u,q E I-NGDUWET 7,766 i 250,000 U I KIDUL 298.550 -- 321 7,5W,OOGllV.1 Kabupaten Kulon Pmgo 10t,3461 12 !9. n,R2,1.s mepy. Z3,9401 2 1 sm,00al 1. W.P.39 47MZ 41 1,000,0001[V.2 Kabup-aTwn-ff8-nEFP- ,ujul Zfi -FM51 1 25(.OEM lJt5Atx,,-AIUK 12,% --- 7w-o 1 85,4161 j i -11-TO37- - 20,224 11 3 "allpal U U .,5501zz TRIHANWO 11.992 i 25 IV.* rOTZMaCYa TOgYaKafM 11 jql W,=I j ng Anyu 19,2911 2 10,471 .. , I -.- i I Total --- T'107.95at ic4,, 30.250. 9.298 250,DDOI 2. LM1.6 i ! I i 7,78(,T-- 50,5831 41 1,000, V. JAWA TIMUR 3,551.7641 242! 94,00D V.1 Kb.p.ten Sidosrjo 104XTF-10. L M -Mrm 5,54yi i zoul T-S 1. StdorJO 3,KLAMPISNIjASEM : , 250, 40v.wu i 1: LhPAAH FU I KA /W. MLNUK rUMrUN I 14t IJJ 3 m 25u,wCY 2. K... 112. 36,6701 Y7--""m 1 KRIAN zw, M ARSABIUMAN 14.610i J 4, Kaloon 24,11" 12 i 5MIUM ANI 12,756i Ybu'uvu T. W.R.. 7,7041 IF I:WUNUUULU 7,704 i . 250, 13. Gubeng 3- -Sij.p. 16,71 4. Lid..gan 17,8771 I 500, 1 PUCANG S 4.692 250,00C A .. a[ Y. 31 2 AIRLANWA 29,1341 750,0001 8,2291 A= 14.9351 12 MAKIjUAFjUNG --- T-mgEu-- 16-7071 500,Wq 6.. D".k 81,4 3. W- 60 1 MLKJAJATA --- 27.087! 75(,Wq I CONDONGCANUR 30,104t 1 11250'auu 12,975i 250 rtphLbul j KUKMbAKI 1z-J39, zzu, IIWUNOKRL)MO 13.D461 7. G.d..ft 20,1Ut-f- WW 4 WADUNriSARI 9.113 i --- 2 2 SAWUNQUAL U I Si OLUHUR 9,35fr--r---25DGW I KUrL)L)U 15,3931 LKWv 2 Sf VAKUM 4; OA"lo zo 970i V.2 K.b.pte. Mojokefto 7,7731 1 5iNGAGEL 1. 5..k. 7,7731 V. Ou'uu I hUL)ru 94,974 19,293 500.DDE4 V.3 Kh.pat- Bjmgol. II I I- soow 1Z WUNUKWV 25.6141 -. 15U.Dcul 5mlogo .3 Kb?U I KAN 21.676 5w.uuq _250-M -7-TIMOUNUUUM) 2 LEDOX KULON 9. 166i 2W.= mal, HARIO VA Kb.patm Tb.. 24,213i -T- 7MM I 11,51 I 8.387[ 2WW 81161 1 250-,M JV.SW t.. d qt; 41 I ALON-ALON C ONU 9.305i 7665 25(y. 2 BLIBUTAN 14.989, 3 PA 7.54 1 750. 1. GUNDIH 26.639, 750,0001 Pagc 33 Indonesia: Urban Poverty PrqiectPAD rtNbi. U.11 11, 3.rd&H KbLUKAtlAN KLLU.--11 JKP.i L tKii MG-teng 14. Pumobuju SWIM 13. Dompit I,&tIA1$ANV 1 9,507 zo.' 1. VtNAN zou'm I UAmrLi w 6 750 ZIULNItINU 9,016 i Z;PUKWUHARJO i j1FhNLLhH 16,432 1 1 1 V.15 Kt...dy Watmg I' 539,63Z 36! 114.750,1311111" 4 EMBON KALLASIN 12,827 Z!)U,I)W 13 (ientmg 37,2731 21 1'064,m au'Y7 GENTENG WE7rAW- IIWLAI Ju'Ku3 1.250,0001 19 Ta.bak Sad _2_M 173,242 YF--43WW Ir.NU&UWN 20.5501 *WIVLM 2 KEDUNUKANi 3.6931 250,00q 751,Mi 1 1 j ISUMLAYU 7,607 I! rALAK &LLINU 27,177 1 ZW-i 2 1KANUY-Nh ------T--TFM -i 500.000 M 1z1jz7i II Z5%QM 4iLEMNPURO 9,486 2-'Ai 1 3 IAMISAKbUU Z"Ij. RmVJAMpI Iz1jz71 zbu.wc 5WALWOPURO - ---- FrM 33,24.1 I 6 SAWOJAJAR 7.3,3211 2 soom I'JAJAU 13,2&41 ZbU,UUL Z 5.k.n -3-Z5111-1111111111 201Simi 10.0371 i Z*V'uuL I I bUPLUN Z3,112 I KAPASAN 15,11/1 I ; : - 21JANDULAN 250,00q 21, 71 , 50U.000 V. Kb.p.t- B-do-B 26,511121 X fWWU J-&AXANUNtbUKI 31SIDOVAL)i 17.047 1 500,000 1. 9-do.0- 14 CIFTOMEJLYG 6,165 4TSPRUGkWURG-- , liKOTAKULON fib"UUANOI (,BID I 1 2! DABASAH zou'ums O!MULY ti'my ZW.UUUI 21 Keiam. 64,3621 DEAN 4!pzu I 4W.004 7!(jADA IO,)77 I!bIL)VLVruwr.1 1 2Q KALI MIL)INDING 7%3au Pat= Situbondo 106AW! 9 LQ= :J. lUojen Y'008 250 IB"Uki zz I Ai 5WOUUI jI1IuuuLoALEM i 2woutg I Pth[SIR zbu'uuq ZIKASIN I 19,%Z bwlmq bemami 4 3,750,000 2 BESUKI 3JKLOJi 250,0014 24,39U =:;M'1F-=ZF)u'OOcj i 4;(jADINCKASRI "A YbUIJKLAN is M bw.uuul 13.017 2. iFans km 204901 21 Wluuul 31VAXtNt, ill 5MIOU14 39,578 I bUMMMKOLAK 1 9, ULM .1 i 4JI Z501MR SWUM I,ztu.uuu 2 KILEN ARI FN A 12,98 I SIKAU 5 zw'Ouq T-SRE.Vondo 27,7711 21 750,Mq I KREMBANUAN "Aw'000 IFATOKAN 7 ;s:;gl i z 4. 1tm m 116-'m 7 1 ouu,uuu L LtAWUkIAN DMIJUCI I [JVUIFAN 17, 37 5w. t]IINYAMPLUN(iAN 1 ju'311 i 250,000 I 2 t5UNUL.F.1-JU Z4,690 750, ,CBONGKARAN 14,31U 2501OW i4i 2SX1 1 2 t I FULEMAN 17,160 -AM, I FLAFUERU ZbuUULI ."Umwv 1 16,4 Kt..b I BAAN AN *W1uLM ISLIMBINfj 12,607 1 xw. 947 Du'uuu 13,9U A mb u Z I 13,111 MIT,= 5. -11-yptih ',"'I Li Awl--V I r"L WANUI I lb,275 -,M, 7,Tni I 25010oq 4 M;grmpm(. 5 Lo-k.m II MKAK BAKA I -p-B`&---pFiFOmiz-zO 25011)[11111 1 TANJUNUSbX". 31111311 IL- 250,MR TA-1-11MULYU 13,307 ad. MtIbfOCtuAWU9G- -TF3 j Mbi i lu'wli ! 9= I i UALUNIbAKI 4-bVMb%bKbAKI Ow,wI 2iMANUKAN KI)i 1 79,0241 9i 2= -LOW AKtJ 2 .065 I fbo'uut ;M.VUU 1. Lek.k "W[ ii -,--M 16,907 1 5wool IJAIIREJO 6-16j zou I &LIAWAi i II'I 250 26 S.ko- .. &Z.J I 62,4031 zi 115001uuu 3 ILLXUMA.N 12,58 250,0001 z.bjMVMuLYV 37 1,250, 9 903 259,99q V.16 Kot...dyi PF.5 1.ggo 61 1. I I1. M.Y-gm 65,60 ZJIA..,.WO 1 MOOD 3 Grui 7.5211 1 2 1 JATT 13,3901 zwl I'AbtMKVWU i 11,2261 - Asi - r sumBbRuFWASAKI zou'w 4 IJIUNMAYLIV 11'1j j W v. I I 3-bu u'w 11jig] I zwl 2m sen-o 1 9,7.351 T-i---BTM 479ij-,- -- i 1 4, MAYANGAN 8,933. 9, fj ' 250,000 --- FrXNOMGNMRLANG 7.5521 ;iDu. KANIUARkN I 13,81ul rk. V.9 Kab.i Bmy..-Ri 1 393,031 34; 9,750,000 Ge.pol 2esn I 2 7,678 1 1 29,8441113 7NFow I 11,6221 I .4*U la I ZILNUVL tKUNAIN I 9,022 25T,= 2 GEMPOL S-9wI 250, t 14,1141 250.Gm V.17 41,163 51 iasojmq 3 LA i .Nu 7,724[ zou'wu 6. F.Cm 7,7151 1 M, 16,1551 2 -Welue" 7.7151 ztul I Pi!;M SAIU 8,4371 'dW'uLM 2- TgAldlim 7,7501 Tr---B'D-,W FUMMN I KI: r 7,7501 Zbu,UM 17,6281 2 3m, WS Ul. VALLM 250, 2. Gdi.gmj. 25,0081 31 7-"^M 3. Clunng 1 32,675 31 75O.We 2 FVIAK 1191 250.uuq I LIAVINUKWU -T-rANIFU- i 10,101 2 IKAJtN'j S'u,; 25i 2 dLNUULUK ZbU,UUU V.14 Kbp.t- M.Iani 240,0681 2, ol 9. 167T zwuui 3 CLURINfj 9.320 zbu,uuu 1. Kepajm 12 "31 1 i I KEPANJEN I 250, 4S.nggo. K,ngkasan : PKUPINtit JAWA I IMUM I SONLi(jUN 250.0 23.W5 1 Mm, LLiZV 250, NIL 11,K-..t-, ium 5GI-.Oe 2 LkWANQ 12-7591 250 YtLUKAMAN Peaduduk! Kai. HanWwq I SEPANJANci --- M937-1 25TOW - zou,uuu j5.w 34,472 3 I FASANWIFLARAN 9.6531 230 bupaten Sidoatfo iui Z.15C. F'-Zza,.. 12.1491 2t 2 NQAGLIK 10.99T 250 v.y. maoupajen mopKerm 1 1 zbuutjq zou,miti 3 wbix 14.822 i 250 V.3 T paten SaMogwo P 21KESI R 8,7131 250,000 v pate I uDan 24,2131 3 1 T*u'uLM I 4 ,.gosmn 19 V.5 Kabupaten Lamongan r 34,042! 31 fw,ULR4 21 5w1w I k ANUL UUU 10.03 ztu, V.6 KatTupaten (iresLk 37,4131 4 1 I.QW.OUUj IJ'134! ZSU= 2 BANJARARUM 9. 14J: ZMJ, V. 1 KOtamadya 19= 37,0241 4 1.UOU.UUUj 2 -KESONVALEM 2WIODD VTKO-taffia-Wa-S 1,775,0 UZ 4(.---UO.UUUI 5 Pkjsji 36.062, 2 I V 9 Kabupaten uwepAvam 3 K.Iib.- ILIOI I Z MOW I L.947 z5a, v. I u Kaoupaten aonaamso 26-.MzI 1 KALIBARU MANIS 8.9771 - 25noo EBONAGLTNG 24-2151 -- V. II Kabupaten 5,tubondo 106,55319 2,750, ZOVIULM Probongg 8,05 9,926 i I i 19 6NW, iSurUan 1 4 Oten mawq r 9smpu W.4-W-7Wr- 3 1,06nm, I LIENDuti V.15KOtamadyaMaIa r 539 6821 947! _z5T= 7. S..b., F.w. TT Kotamadya Pm;Wn-gi 73:255, 1. t5o, 3 I1,fMUUUKUH is':144i MG FbUMLILK PUCUNCi 10.996, 4 v. I I Koiamaoya asuruw 41.1631 5: 1.Z 2 K-AFLANCjKATES K,9tg ;ebu. 10 -p-j. M 147-2- -560-100 I otat -Yb5T,154124 F-AEA 6LUH ------FOrUF- -25CFOM . imbuit 9.724, 1 2 OKFJO 9,236i i Ki 9.724: 2 I TT- lip-0 23,401 2 750.W 9tio.dangleg. 17.213; 2 -- 306 I KALIPURO 16.7971 '000 -- F-GDNU-I,LM KULON U77: zw. 2 rf-giLl -250'ma W t IAN S.Vjb: 32,108' 1 11.170i I -- FKEDLTNG '6911 1 TUREN 11.1for Z 1"WuNuKhju L2,4171 buuluuu I IL, D. 9.414 i 250-00% Z5;y - 75W'Ow -- F-mIJLYO AGUNG 9-4W 2 ------L- Indonesia:Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 34 ANNEX3 URBAN POVERTY PROJECT ESTIMATEDPROJECT COSTS Project Component Local | Foreign Total ------US $ million------1. Grants for subprojects 86.0 23.4 109.4 2. TA and Services for Management/Implementation 13.5 2.0 15.5 2.1 TA for PMU 0.5 0.5 1.0 2.2 TA for oversight consultants 4.0 0.5 4.5 2.3 Service contracts (kelurahan facilitators;trainers) 9.0 1.0 10.0 3. TA for Monitoring and Evaluation 1.1 0.4 1.5 4. Increased Government Administration 3.3 0 3.3 Price and Physical Contingencies 1/ 0 0 0 Total Project Cost 103.9 25.8 129.7 1/ No contingencies included as the project is prograumatic. The major uncertainty is the exchange rate that will prevail during implementation;if the rupiah rate improves, the credit fnances less. Note: The standard ANNEX 4 does not apply ANNEX 5 FINANCIALSUMMARY Years Ending March 31 (US$ million, current prices) Implementation Period 2000 2001 2002 2003 Total % Project Costs 1. Grants for subprojects 40.0 40.0 23.4 6.0 109.4 84 2. TA for Implementation 5.0 6.0 3.0 1.5 15.5 12 3. TA for Monitoring 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.1 1.5 1 4.Increased Gov't Admin. 1.1 1.1 0.8 0.3 3.3 3 Total 46.6 47.6 27.6 7.9 129.7 100 Financing Sources % IDAI/ 36.5 36.5 21.5 5.5 100.0 77 IBRD 5.0 6.0 3.0 1.5 15.5 12 GOI 5.1 5.1 3.1 0.9 14.2 11 Total 46.6 47.6 27.6 7.9 129.7 100 Main assumptions: 1/ Initial disbursement from the Loan to the Special Account to take place upon loan effectiveness;the SA and the different fiscal year ending account for differences with yearly loan disbursements on page 1. Page 35 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD ANNEX 6 URBAN POVERTY PROJECT PROCUREMENT,DISBURSEMENT AND AUDnITNG ARRANGEMENTS Procurement Procurementmethods (Table A) Procurement of works and goods will follow the "Guidelines for Procurement under IBRIDLoans and IDA Credits" dated January 1995, and revised in January and August 1996 and September 1997. Employment of consultants and the format for consultant contracts will be based on the "Guidelines for Selection and Employment of Consultants by World Bank Borrowers" of January 1997, as revised in September 1997. Procurement under Grants (subgrantsor loans)for subprojects (Table 6A) There is a ceiling of Rp50 million for a fund to provide small revolving credits to individuals/groupsand of Rp3Omillion for any proposal by a group. The funds are to cover consultants, services, goods and works, as needed for preparing and implementingsubprojects. The proposal for each subproject approved will be signed by the Oversight Consultant,the Kelurahan Forum leader and the lurah. It will be attached to an Implementation Agreement) signed by the members of the subproject group and the PjOK (Project Manager). Individual procurements will be small and widely dispersed. Procurementprocedures thus include national shopping, procurement of small works, and communityparticipation following best commercial practices. Standard formats are in Annex 12. Facilitators. Facilitators or advisors can be hired by the groups that propose or implement subprojects. The selection can use appointment procedures for individuals or service contracts based on 3 offers. The fees would be paid from the subproject funding when the proposal or claims are approved. Goods. Goods shall be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of national shopping procedures. Quotations must be obtained from at least 3 reputable suppliers on the basis of a detailed description and quantity of goods, as well as the desired delivery time and place. Works. Works that can be implemented efficiently with labor intensive methods can be undertaken by community participation. Other works will be procured under the Bank procurement category of small works (given the ceiling of the grant); they can be contracted under lump-sum, fixed price contracts awarded on the basis of quotations obtained from 3 reputable domestic contractors in response to a written invitation. The invitation shall include a detailed description of the works, including basic specifications, the required completion date, a basic form of agreement acceptable to the Bank, and relevant drawings, where applicable. The award shall be made to the contractor who offers the lowest price quotations for the required work, and who has the experience and resources to complete the contract successfully. Procurement by the PMU (Table 6.AI) Consultants. There will be national management consultants for the PMU and oversight consultants for each province to establish teams at the kabupaten level. Facilitators will also be selected and hired by the oversight consultants. The PMU in Jakarta will select and hire oversight consultants for 2 years (9 contracts for Phase 1, larger kelurahans in Northem Java) and technical assistance for monitoring and evaluation. Later, oversight consultants may be selected and hired by each local govenmmentas may be appropriate. Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 36 Prior review thresholds (Table B) Considering the small amount involved in any one expenditure under grants, and the delays that the prior review could entail by forwarding to the Bank, the OC will do the prior review, before countersigning.The Bank will conduct field visits during the project start-up period and carry out prior reviews for contracts that may be ready, expected to be a small sample of goods valued above $2,000 and works valued above $3,000 equivalent. At least 3% of the subproject implementation agreements will have contracts reviewed ex-post the first 6 months; thereafter this percentage will be adjusted based on the Bank's assessment of the effectiveness of the OCs. Consultant contracts processed by PMU, for national management support, oversight consultants including facilitators, and monitoring and evaluation, will be reviewed by the Bank prior to approval. The total contract value, including service contracts, subject to prior review will be $7 million. Procurementplans Each proposal/ImplementationAgreement includes a section on procurement. This will be reviewed in the verification of proposals and discussed and agreed prior to the signing. The Bank may participate in some of the discussions. The process to mobilize oversight consultants and trainers is advanced, to enable their training prior to loan effectiveness. An advertisement for national management support has been placed in 2 Indonesian newspapers. Disbursements A4llocationsof loan proceeds (Table C) Grants for subprojects: An arrangement will be made by MOF to channel funds through its regional KPKNs to the preselected BRI outlets. Selection of BRI outlets will be based on their proximity to thekelurahan and their liquidity. They will be provided with the amount of the grant allocation for eachkelurahan and the relevant signature specimens to withdraw funds. KF will open a KF Account in the BRI office which will be funded when at least 5 subproject implementation agreements are approved. The PjOK shall endorse the documentation from the groups and forward it to the KPKN, that in turn instruct BI to transfer the required amount to the BRI office Kelurahan Forum account. The initial transfer is 40% of the kelurahan grant; a second transfer of 40% would follow when the account balance is 10%, the OC, KF and PjOK are satisfied with the use of earlier funds and with the justification of further funding. The final 20% will follow in the same way. When the subproject implementation agreement is signed, the group may claim payments in accordance with the terms of the agreement, from the local designated BRI outlet. Payments to the groups may be in cash or deposited to the group's account. Subsequentclaims for payment will be based on progress reports certified by the consultant, the lurah, the KF, and the PjOK. Upon presentation of the completion report, the final balance is disbursed to the group. The BRI office can disburse to the group against approved subproject documentation (agreement or claim amounts) after verification of signatures. It will have a record of credits and debits byKelurahan, and verify that the latter do not exceed the former; it will also verify that it does not disburse more than was approved for each subproject (debits should be identified by date and withdrawer). Records shall be made available tomonitorers and auditors upon request. BRI may invest partially any balance and keep accrued interest to compensate its operating costs incurred, but at any time shall have sufficient liquidity to pay claims within the balance amount. Periodically BRI would provide disbursement statements by kelurahan, kecamatan and kabupaten (may be province) and send a statement to the Project Secretariatand DG Budget, Ministry of Finance. Expenses by the PMU: Requests for payment approved by the PMU on contracts entered into by itself or the levels II on its behalf for the project, would be paid by the SA directly to the consultant or the service provider, Page 37 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD to their designatedbank accounts. Use of statements of expenses (SOEs): Disbursements will be made against Statements of Expenditure (SOEs) for subproject grants, services, individual consultant contracts of less than $50,000 equivalent and consulting firm contracts of less than $100,000 equivalent. Documentation for subproject expenditures will be retained by the community groups at kelurahan level; as appropriate, by the PjOK at district level and by the commercial bank. Documentation for other expendituresprocured by the PMU (i.e., services, individual consultant contracts less than US$50,000 equivalent and consulting firm contracts less than US$100,000 equivalent) will be retained by the PMU. All other disbursements from the loan will require full documentation and they will be retained by the PMU. All documentation will be made available to the Bank and auditors upon request. Special Account: GOI will establish a Special Account at Bank Indonesia denominated in US dollars, with an authorized ceiling of $10,000,000. The Account will be managed by the Directorate General of Budget (DGB), Ministry of Finance. The initial advance will be $5,000,000 upon credit effectiveness and until withdrawalsreach $20,000,000;the account will be replenished on a monthly basis, or when 20% of the authorized ceiling has been disbursed, whichever occurs first. Flow of Funds. The PMU's Pimpro (for PMU expenses) and the PjOKs (for subprojects) will be responsible for authorizing expenditures in accordance with the agreed budgets under existing government procedures. They will submit their payment requests to the DG Budget or their respectiveMoF Treasurer (KPKN) who will issue payment remittance orders (SPM) to Bank Indonesia to credit the payee's accounts at the latter's respective banks and to debit the project Special Account. The DG Budget will provide KPKN with guidelinesand criteria for eligible project expenditures, in accordance with the Credit Agreement. All the required forms necessary to submit payment requests and the relevant documentationare standard and are currently applicable to all foreign-funded projects. KPKN will provide copies of the payment remittance orders (SPM) and other supportingdocuments to the DG Budget regularly. Based on these documents and the Bank Indonesia statementof the SA, DG Budget shall prepare applications for replenishment of the SA. Disbursements for subprojects will be channeled through the regionalKPKNs (both Bank and GOI funds) to the preselected BRI outlets. The authorizedgroup, presents documentation signed by the OC,PjOK, KF leader and lurah at the preselected BRI outlet for payments. The initial transfer of 40% of kelurahan grant, when the first 5 agreements approved, will be funded 10% from GOI funds and 30% from the Special Account in Bank Indonesia, from the World Bank credit. Subsequent transfers, the second 40% and final 20%, will be fully funded from the Special Account. Funds flow diagram for subproject disbursementsis attached. Payments to the oversight consultants and the national management consultant will be by Jakarta's BI/KPKN, upon authorizationof the Project Secretariat. Financial Management System Internal Control System. The project will follow the standard government's financial mechanism which includes an internal control system--consisting of an institutional framework (project organization), accounting system, and control procedures. The adequacy of staff to carry out the project and adoption of internal controls by the agency involved under the project, will be reviewed during project start up. The PMU will have a Project Manager (Pimpro) and Treasurer from Bappenas, and a small team of consultant technical staff to carry out procurement and financial related administration. The qualification requirements for Pimpro and Treasurer are as follows: Pimpro Treasurer * Competent staff of the agency * Competent staff of the agency * University degree (S1) * Diploma (D2 or D3) * Minimum staff level III/c * Minimum staff level II/c * Attainment of project management course * Attainment of treasury course certificate or Indonesia:Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 38 certificate or equivalent equivalent * Two years working experience in a * One year working experience in governmentproject governmentproject Financial Statements. The project financial statements showing the financial position of the project during the fiscal year ended on March 31 will comprise of the following: (a) Financial Statement of Project Accounts: The PMU will maintain separate accounting records, on cash basis, for each source of funds, i.e. Annual and CumulativeProject Expenditures and Financing (APEF and CPEF). The APEF and CPEF will cover the subproject expendituresby district, kecamatan and kelurahan, as consolidated by the PMU from reports by the BRI, DG Budget, KPKNs, as well as expenses made by the PMU for consultant services. The community groups shall retain the relevant supporting documents for subproject expenditures, PjOK and BRI offices shall keep the groups' receipt of funds, and PMU will keep the documentsrelated to consultants' service expenses. All the documentation shall be made available for annual audit and random inspectionby the Bank. (b) Financial Statement of Special Account and SOE: The DG Budget, as custodian of the project Special Account and responsible for disbursing funds from the Bank, will prepare the financial statements of the Special Account and the SOE (Statements of Expenditures). The financial statements in standard formats (June 1992) will include the following: * Deposits and replenishments to the Special Accountreceived from the Bank * Withdrawals from the Special Account, including all SOEs (both from SA and other accounts) used as the basis for submission of withdrawal applications * Remaining balance at the fiscal year end * Reconciliationbetween amount received by SA and amount disbursed by the Bank Project Financial Management Reporting Requirements. As part of the monitoring system, the PMU will report to the Bank, progress of financial status on a quarterly basis, no later than one month after the end of quarter. All financialreports, generated from reports by KPKN and DG Budget will follow the agreed formats (provided in the PIP), which include the following: * Annual and Cumulative Project Expendituresand Financing (APEF and CPEF) * Progress Report of Project Expendituresand Financing (PRPEF) * Summary of Sources and Uses of Funds (SSUF) * Contract ExpendituresReport (CONREP) * Project Expendituresand Financing by District (LOCPEF) * Status of Loan Disbursements(STATLN) Auditing Requirements The quarterly progress reports would be used as the basis of preparing the financial statement of project account (namely APEF and CPEF) to be submitted to the BPKP for annual audits. The annual audit reports shall be fumished to the Bank no later than 9 months after the end of the government fiscal year, i.e., not later than December 30 each year. The PMU will prepare the project accounts for audit by BPKP head office that will provide the audit opinion. Likewise, the BPKP head office will also audit the financial statement of Special Account and Statement of Expenditure (SOE) prepared by DG Budget. The audits by BPKP auditors would be in accordance with terms of reference for the audit of project performance, project accounts, Special Account. BPKP will also audit due process and due diligence by community groups on a sample basis, and the attainment of objectives according to performance indicators. BPKP will coordinate its sampling with that of audit agencies at levels I and II to avoid one kelurahan being audited more than once in any year. Page 39 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD URBAN POVERTY PROJECT Reports and Funds Flow Diagram .. krBnkBa Task Manager/ LOAAS BAPPENAS . MinistryvofFinance |.... Snkndnesn1 Center ...... DGB . SA GOI UPP Secretariat National Consultant 90% ' 10% ; | ~~~~~~~~~~~KPKN ...... SPM Province SPP Oversight| | . Kabupaten Consultant [Witato~jj'.-.. KelurahanForums * I \s L = = = ' -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~...... ,, | i \ PjOK i L; > ~~~~~Kecamatan |F acilitators Fooumsn petrahan Ar nr t[Community |Technical |_ ~ ru - Assistantstanc nuppifers etc ...... Authorization of disbursementfor the kelurahan ===> Approval prior to PjOK forwarding -...... -- - Informationfteportsflow from kelurahan progress (ImplementationAgreement or claims) -- > Assistance O' Fund flow Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 40 Annex 6, Table Al: Project Costs by Procurement Arrangements (in US$ million equivalent) Expenditure Category Procurement Method Total Cost (including contingencies) ICB NCB Other N.B.F 1. Grants for subprojects 109.4 (98.5) 1/ 109.4 (98.5) 2. GOI Administration 3.3 3.3 Total n.a. n.a. 109.4 (98.5) 3.3 109.4 (98.5) Note: N.B.F. = Government coverage of its administrationexpenditures Other: 1/ procurementby cormnunitymembers under subproject agreements;these agreements also cover the hiring of individuals under service contractsto implement the subprojects . ( ) Figures in parenthesis are the amounts to be financed by the IDA credit. Annex 6, Table A2: Consultant Selection Arrangements (in US$ million equivalent) Selection Method Total Cost Consultant Services (including Expenditure Category contingencies) QCBS QBS SFB LCS CQ Other N.B.F. A. TA for Implementation 5.5 (5.5) 5.5 (5.5) (PMU, OCs) l/ B. TA for Monitoring and 1.5 (1.5) 1.5 (1.5) Evaluation C. Service contracts 1! 10 (10) 10 (10) Total 7.0 (7.0) 10 (10) 17.0 (17.0) Note: QCBS= Quality- and Cost-BasedSelection QBS = Quality-basedSelection SFB = Selection under a Fixed Budget LCS = Least-Cost Selection CQ =Selection Based on Consultants'Qualifications Other = Selectionof individual consultants (per Section V of ConsultantsGuidelines), Conmnercial Practices, etc. These facilitators are hired by the PMU/OCs for the start up, prior to individuals hired by comnmunities(Table 6A) N.B.F. = Not Bank-financed ( ) =Figures in parenthesis are the amounts to be financed by the IDA credit. / To be financed by SUDP Ln. 3726-IND. Page 41 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD Annex 6, Table B: Thresholds for ProcurementMethods and Prior Review Expenditure Contract Value Procurement Contracts Subject to Category (Threshold) Method Prior Review / Estimated Total Value Subject to Prior Review US$ thousand US$ million 1. Grants for subprojects 3 Small works/ community n.a. National shopping/comm. 2. TA for 100 QCBS, Other Bappenas $5m implementationand monitoring 3. Service contracts 50 Time based $2m Total value of contracts subject to prior review: n.a. Annex 6, Table C: Allocation of Credit Proceeds Expenditure Category Amount in Financing US$ million Percentage 1. Grants for Subprojects 98.5 90 2. TA and Services for Implementation 1.5 100 Total 100 Indonesia:Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 42 ANNEX 7 URBAN POVERTY PROJECT PROJECT PROCESSINGBUDGET AND SCHEDULE A. Project Budget (US$) Planned Actual to 4/15/99 (At final PCD stage) Preparation, EASUR $200,000 $130,000 PHRD grant TF25119 $750,000 $200,000 B. Project Schedule Planned Actual (At initial PCD stage) (to 4/15/99) Time taken from initial PCD to appraisal -- 6 months First Bank mission (identification) - 12/01/1997 Appraisal start 09/01/1998 09/28/1998 Negotiations(loan) 09/10/1998 10/22/1998 Supplementarynegotations (for credit) - 04/09/1999 Planned Date of Effectiveness 10/30/1998 07/08/1999 Prepared by: World Bank/Bappenas/consultants Preparation assistance: Messrs. Pungky Sumadi, Andrew McLemon, Darrundono, Erwin Fahmi, Guritno Soerijodibroto, Heru Nurasa, Hudi Sartono, Imam Krismanto, Oloan Simatupang, Sutan Jamaluddin and Yando Zakaria and Mss. Rachmina Nurlily and Wiwiek Sudjono. Bank staff who worked on the project included: Name Specialty Frida Johansen Economics/Procurement/Management Yogana Prasta Disbursements Karin Nordlander Legal Counsel Bridie Champion Disbursements Thomas Walton Environment Page 43 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD ANNEX 8 URBAN POVERTY PRJECT DOCUMENTSIN THE PROJECTFILE A. Project ImplementationPlan B. Bank Staff Assessments Urban agriculture reviews, July 1998 Preparation for West Java Environmentalproject, ongoing KIP reviews Rapid assessments, August 1998 C. Other VIP and KDP documents Data on poverty PCD, PID Decision meeting minutes PHRD grant agreement Contracts with project preparationteam Documentationfor hiring oversight consultants (ads, list of respondents,long list, shortlists, terms of reference, LoI, evaluation criteria, draft contract) Terms of reference for trainers Various cost estimate tables Draft and final Project Manual Draft material for training of facilitators Regulation formalizingthe Secretariat Other documents in Indonesian Negotiated Loan Agreement/CreditAgreement and minutes 0.L ANNEX 9 Status of Bank Group Operations in Indonesia OperationsPortfolio Difference Between ' expected 0 Original Amount io US$ Millions and actual Fiscal disbursements a/> Project ID Year Borrower Purpose IBRD IDA Cancellations Undisbursed Orig Frm Rev'd Number of Closed Projects: 216 > Active Pro1ects ID-PE-36049 1999 GOI EARLY CHILD DEVELOPM 21.50 0.00 0.00 20.40 -1.10 ID-PE-3967 0.00 1999 GOI FIFTH HEALTH PROJECT 44.70 0.00 0.00 43.66 .30 ID-PE-40196 0.00 1999 GOVERNMENT OF INDONESIA SUMATRA BASIC EDUCA. 54.50 20,10 0.00 74.60 0.00 0.00 ID-PE-41095 1999 GOVERNMENT OF INDONESIA SULAWESI BASIC EDUC. 47.90 15.90 00OO 63.80 0.00 0.00 ID-PE-56074 1999 REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA MUNICIPAL INNOVATION 5.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 ID-PE-63732 1999 CORPORATE RESTRUCTRG 31.50 0.00 0.00 31.50 0.00 0.00 ID-PE-36048 1998 GOI CORAL REEF MGM REHAB 6.90 0.00 0.00 6.40 .30 ID-PE-36956 1998 GOI .10 SAFE MOTHERHOOD 42.50 0.00 6.00 34.56 6.55 -.11 ID-PE-37095 1998 GOI MALUKU REG. DEV 16.30 0.00 0.00 15.65 .65 0.00 ID-PE-39644 1998 GOI W.JAVA BASIC EDUC. 103.50 0.00 0.00 100.50 -1.50 0.00 ID-PE-3993 1998 GOI N.SUMATRA REG. ROADS 234.00 0.00 50.00 184.00 6.00 2.50 ID-PE-40061 1998 GOI BENGKULU REG DEV 20.50 0.00 0.00 19.90 1.60 0.00 ID-PE-45337 1998 GOI KECAMATAN DEV FUND 225.00 0,00 0.00 212.13 -.37 0.00 ID-PE-48715 1998 IIDP 34.50 0.00 8.50 24.64 7.66 8.89 ID-PE-55755 1998 REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA BANKING REFORM ASST. 20.00 0.00 0.00 13.73 13.73 0.00 ID-PE-35544 1997 GOI SOLAR HOME SYSTEMS 20.00 0.00 2.50 17.50 5.50 0.00 ID-PE-36047 1997 GOI BALI URBAN INFRAST. 110.00 0.00 15.00 89.52 2.82 0.00 ID-PE-36053 1997 GOI SULAWESI UDP II 155.00 0.00 42.05 94.44 66.80 6.45 ID-PE-3987 1997 C.INDONESIA SEC.EDU. 104.00 0.00 0.00 96.50 28.79 0.00 ID-PE-40195 1997 GOI QUAL OF UNDERGRAD ED 71.20 0.00 9.89 53.86 6.05 0.00 ID-PE-4026 1997 GOI/PERUMKA RLWY EFFICIENCY 105.00 0.00 0.00 103.60 32.10 0.00 ID-PE-40521 1997 GOI VILLAGE INFRA II 140.10 0.00 0.00 74.23 47.89 13.17 ID-PE-41894 1997 GOI SUMATRA SEC EDUC 98.00 0.00 0.00 83.29 7.28 0.00 ID-PE-42540 1997 IODINE DEF. CONTROL 2a.50 0.00 2.50 23.19 3.19 0.00 ID-PE-49051 1997 BEPEKA AUDIT MODER P 16.40 0.00 .90 13.05 2.79 0.00 ID-PE-37097 1996 GOI E.JAVA SEC.EDUC. 99.00 0.00 0.00 80.23 10.23 0.00 ID-PE-39312 1996 GOI SECOND E. JAVA UDP 142.70 0.00 25.70 94.65 107.65 0.00 ID-PE-39643 1996 GOI STD/AIDS 24.80 0.00 19.80 1.69 20.10 0.00 ID-PE-3978 1996 GOI IND'L TECHNOLOGY DEV 47.00 0.00 6.00 24.13 22.57 6.58 ID-PE-4003 1996 GOI SECONDARY SCHOOL TEA 60.40 0.00 30.00 19.22 31.23 0.00 ID-PE-4004 1996 GOI HIGHER EDUC SUP.(III 65.00 0.00 6.85 33.93 -1.98 0.00 ID-PE-4008 1996 GOI NUSA TENGGARA DEV. 27.00 0.00 4.90 14.18 3.69 -2.15 ID-PE-4011 1996 GOI SULAWESI AGRI AREA 26.80 0.00 3.70 15.61 1.25 -I.75 ID-PE-4014 1996 GOI KERINCI SEBLAT ICDP 19.10 0.00 0.00 17.44 6.22 0.00 ID-PE-4016 1996 REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA STRATEGIC URB. RDS 1 86.90 0.00 10.00 63.98 35.58 0.00 ID-PE-4021 1996 GOI POW. TRANS & DIST II 373.00 0.00 80.00 180.43 207.42 -12.60 ID-PE-41896 1996 GOI HR CAPACITY BUILDING 20.00 0.00 3.60 14.83 10.94 0.00 ID-PE-3951 1995 GOI KALIMANTAN UDP 136.00 0.00 0.00 59.22 52.72 0.00 ID-PE-3965 1995 GOI HEALTH IV:IMPR HEALT 88.00 0.00 20.00 49.08 27.58 5.07 ID-PE-3968 1995 BOOK & READING DEV 132.50 0.00 31.50 76,04 29.79 -6.04 ID-PE-3972 1995 GOI AG. RESEARCH II 63.00 0.00 14.10 36.46 34.06 -.78 ID-PE-39754 1995 TA FOR INFRA. II 28.00 0.00 0.00 23.01 20.22 3.56 ID-PE-3984 1995 GOI LAND ADMINISTRATION 80.00 0.00 16.50 28.12 26.92 ID-PE-3988 1995 GOI 0.00 PHRD II 69.00 0.00 0.00 28.41 10.39 0.00 ID-PE-4001 1995 GOI TELECOM SECTOR MODER 325.00 0.00 50.00 188.66 143.66 ID-PE-4019 1995 GOI 0.00 ACCOUNTANCY DEV II 25.00 0.00 3.30 10.17 12.25 0.00 ID-PE-3890 1994 GOI SEMARANG-SURAKARTA U 174.00 0.00 18.67 66.66 63.07 18.45 Difference Between expected original Amount in US$ Millions and actual Fiscal disbursements a/ Project ID Year Borrower Purpose IBRD IDA Cancellations Undisbursed Orig Frm Rev'd ID-PE-3910 1994 GOT SUMATERA f KALIMAN P 260,50 0.00 20.00 165.52 156.02 12.23 ID-PE-3937 1994 GOI INTEGRATED SWAMPS 65.00 0.00 0.00 29.20 18.07 0.00 ID-PE-3945 1994 GOI HIGHWAY SECTOR II 350.00 0.00 40.00 124.19 150.18 -185.83 ID-PE-3954 1994 GOI JAVA IRR IMP & W R M 165.70 0.00 22.00 67.81 58.48 0.00 ID-PE-3985 1994 GOI WTRSHED CONSERVATION 56.50 0.00 0.00 41.76 27.80 0.00 ID-PE-3998 1994 GOI SURABAYA URBAN 175.00 0.00 30.00 68.96 81.03 17.21 ID-PE-4010 1994 GOI DAM SAFETY 55.00 0.00 8.00 23.99 23.94 0.00 ID-PE-4017 1994 GOI UNIV.RESEARCH FOR GR 58.90 0.00 11.23 18.11 20.46 0.00 ID-PE-4020 1994 GOI KABUPATEN ROADS V 101.50 0.00 0.00 14.80 13.78 0.00 ID-PE-3914 1993 GOI THIRD COMM HEALTH & 93.50 0.00 16.00 6.54 17.02 0.00 ID-PE-3990 1993 GOI WTR & SANI FOR LOW I 80.00 0.00 11.00 26.17 37.19 0.00 ID-PE-3999 1993 GOI GROUNDWATER DEVT. 54.00 0.00 24.94 1.86 19.60 1.80 ID-PE-4006 1993 GOI E.INDONESIA KABUPATE 155.00 0.00 0.00 15.16 15.13 0.00 ID-PE-4007 1993 GOI POWER (CIRATA II) 104.00 0.00 26.00 16.04 41.08 -4.28 ID-PE-4009 1993 GOI INTEGRATED PEST MGMT 32.00 0.00 5.50 4.00 9.49 .59 ID-PE-3860 1992 GOI TREECROPS SMALLHOLDE 87.60 0.00 9.30 11.59 20.11 0.00 ID-PE-3916 1992 SURALAYA THERMAL POW 423.60 0.00 132.20 23.61 150.70 7.98 ID-PE-3969 1992 GOI PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACH 36.60 0.00 3.20 2.75 5.95 0.00 ID-PE-3997 1992 GOI TELECOM IV 375.00 0.00 50.08 47.02 97.09 7.01 ID-PE-3977 1991 GOI THIRD JABOTABEK URB 61.00 0.00 6.24 5.45 11.70 1.31 Total 6,659.10 36.00 897.65 3,340.33 2,087.41 -100.64 Active Projects Closed Projects Total Total Disbursed (IBRD and IDA): 2,457.15 17,834.21 20,291.36 of which has been repaid: 49.18 8,422.38 8,471.56 Total now held by IBRD and IDA: 5,748.23 9,545.62 15,293.85 Amount sold : 0.00 88.08 88.08 Of which repaid : 0.00 88.08 88.08 Total Undisbursed : 3,340.33 133.82 3,474.15 a. Intended disbursements to date minus actual disbursements to date as projected at appraisal. Note: Disbursement data is updated at the end of the first week of the month and is currently as of 31-Mar-99. 3 0.Pa a n >0 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 46 ANNEX 10 Indonesia at a glance East Lower- POVERTY and SOCIAL Asia & middle- Indonesia Pacifc income D@wIoprnntdlbmond 1997 Populaton,mid-year (millions) 200.1 1.753 2.285 Uifeexpectancy GNPper capita(Atlas method, USS) 1,110 970 1,230 GNP(Atlas method. US$ brions) 222.1 1,707 2818. Averageannual growth, 190147 Population(%) ..- 1.3 1.2 Laborfore(%) I2Z5 1.4 13: GNplP Grass per primary Mostrecentestimate(Iatmtyeuravailab,1 t 4rl7- - capita enrolment Poverty(SS of populattonbwnatlofnapovwertyne -:I 1 Urbanpopulation (%6;of totalpWdalnk: 37" 32 42 Life expectancyatbirf, (years) 85s 89 89 Infantmortality (per 1000lbiithsJtjN 47 38 38: Childmalnutrition (% oftdrWrunder5) 40: 16 .Acess to safewater Accessto safewater(%; ofp ipopaffw, 82 84 84 Illiteracy(56ofpopuatWonaget5+) 1B17 19 Grossprinmay enrollment (%o so ptd n - 114 115 111 Male 1.117 118 1:118': -Lower e_ omegup Female - 12 18 13; ______KEYECONOMIC RATIOS and LONG-TERM TRENDS:- - i 4 C t : ;:1976 19680:- 1996 1997M:: . Economicrateos GOP(US$ bitlions) 393a -79.9 227.4 214.8 Grossdomestic investmentJGOP 24.1: 2o2 i 30.8 32.1 Exportsof goodsand&seOvicGOP- 24.5 -20.2 25.8 28.1 Trade Grss domesticsavingstGOP- 27.1 28.3 30.2 30.9 GrossnationalsavingpsGOP .. .. 25.5 Currentaccount balance/GOP - - .: -3*5 -12 Domestic nesmt Interestpayments/GOP: 12 3.0 2 1 Invest2ent TotaldebtlGOP 3854B 53.7 58.7 4a Savings Totaldebt servicelexports .. .. 35.5 Presertvalue of debt/GDP ,, ,. 550 Presentvalue of debtlexports .. .- 208.8 Indebtedness 197848: 1987U.7 1996 1997 199I42 (averageannual growth) GOP 8.7 7.8 8.r 4.8 .. 1ndonesa i GNP per capita 4.1 8.1 5.8 3.5 .. -Lowern4nhomegzp Exports of goods and serices -1.7 871 8.3 8.3 . STRUCTURE of the ECONOMY 1976 1988 1996 1997 Growth ratesof output and investment1%) (% of GDP) -1 Aguncultdre 29.7 24.3 16.5 16.1 Industry 34.1 33.8 43.2 43.9 Manufacturing 10.4 16.8 25.5 25.6 s Services 38.3 41.9 40.3 40.1 Privateconsumption 63.5 6Z8 6Z3 6Z2 92 O3 94 Gs 9s 97 Generalgovemment consumption 9.4 - 11.1 7.6 6.9 Importsof goodsand services 21.5 20.5 28.4 29.2 19786S 1987-97 1996 1997 Growthrates of expoata and impartst (% (averageannua/ gmowth) Agrculture 4.1 3.2 3.2 0.6 2T Industry 8.5 10.0 10.5 5.6 20 Manufactunng 14.5 11.0 11.7 6.2 is Services 8.7 7.9 7.2 5.3/ Private consumption 10.0 7.9 7.4 7.5 s General govemment consumption 9.2 3.9 3.8 0.1 o Grossdomesticinvestment 10.8 10.6 11.8 4.2 92 o3 9 9s 9 9t Imports of goods and services 7.3 11.2 9.8 18.2 Exs e bnpoo Gross national product 8.2 7.9 7.5 5.1 Note: 1997 data are preliminaryestmates. I Povertyestimate is from 1990. The diamonds show four key indicatorsin the country fin bold) compared with its income-groupaverage. If data are missing,the diamondwill be incomplete. Page 47 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD ANNEX 11 URBAN POVERTY PROJECT Project Implementation Plan Revised February 15 A: Preparation Schedule Task By month/day, Actual 1998 Foreseen PHRD Grant Grant approved in principle 3/30 Request of Bank as executing agency 7/22 Grant agreementsent to MoF 7/29 MoF countersigningagreement 8/13 Effectiveness 9/11 Closing date (Normally effectivenessdate of the loan) 6/30 Project preparationteam Selectionof individuals 7/1 Mobilization 7/6 Contracts signed 7/28 Field trips for rapid assessments 7/31 Clarificationson project concept 7/31 Office facilities completed 8/14 Agreement on project concept 10/15 End of contract 2/28 Urban poverty identification Definekabupatens to be assisted first year (in principle,north Java) 8/10 Ask levels I (Java) to identifypoor urban kecamatans 8/21 Estimate urban population,by province and kabupaten 9/15 Estimate funding to allocateper province/kabupaten 9/28 Identificationof poor kelurahans/size 9/28 Circulars and disseminationof information Draft 5 page description of program (English) 8/7 Draft I page circular for RWs (English) 8/7 Final version, circular Indonesian 10/30 2/28 Brochure, English and Indonesian (Annex 2) 3/8 Local languageversions (by province at the most (?)) Text for initial presentation at kecamatan/kelurahan 2/28 Request quotations for printing circular 8/17 2/25 Request quotations for printing brochure 10/5 3/9 Print 3000 brochures, 6000 (?) circulars 3/14 Distribute circulars, brochures to Bappedas, agencies (at training) 3/15-4/2 Post in Internet, indicating program starting dates by location 4/1 Budgets Prepare project items cost estimates 10/15 Bappenas to prepare budget request 11/16 MoF budget approval 12/7 ? MoF to prefinance advances OC. NMC 4/2 and 19 Informationto KPKNs 5/17 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 48 Actual Foreseen Funds available from credit 5/28 (earliest) MoF to recover advance 6/15 ? Project Manual Draft Manual (in Indonesian) 9/30 eligibility criteria to access funds facilitator availability disbursementflows/procedures agreement formats for fund recipients reporting formats by facilitators,oversight consultants,PMD bookkeeping, for groups and Kelurahan Final Manual agreed 2/19 Copies to MoHA (10) 2/20 Printing (200 copies) 3/1 Printing 2200 copies 3/22 Channelingbank(s) Select, agree with, the bank(s) and MoF 10/23 2/2 Send letter to BRI with procedures 3/12 The bank(s) to prepare instructions to branches in selectedkecamatans 4/19 Inform relevant branches 5/17 Receive initial advance based on implementationagreements 6/15 Coordinationwith MoHA, etc. Inform TkII of the program and their role 8/22 Select PjOK 12/15 Training arrangements 12/1 Training manual for government staff 3/8 Training in W- C -E Java (100 persons each location) 3/15-19; 22-26; 3/29-4/2 Oversightconsultants recruitment Identify provincial newspapers 8/7 Prepare ad for provincial newspapers (Java's 5 provinces) 8/10 Publish ad for expressions of interest 8/11 Receive expressions of interest 9/15 Prepare 9 short list of firms 9/30 Invite bids by fax 10/2 Estimate numbers of consultants needed 10/5 Prepare TORs, LOI and evaluation criteria, standard draft contract 10/5 Request nol 10/7 Distribute conceptnote, circular, TORS, etc. 10/12 Hold bid explanation meeting with firms 10/19-22 Receive bids 11/9 - 16 Evaluate bids 2/15 Bank's nol 2/18 Notify winners 2/19 - 26 Discuss price 2/23 - 3/5 Draft contracts(9) 3/1 - 8 Bank's nol 3/12 Sign 9 contracts 3/15-16 Bank's nol for disbursement(subject to Board approval of project) 3/30 MoF prefmance mobilization advance 4/2 Mobilization of OC for training 4/15 Page 49 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD Actual Foreseen Training for oversight consultants and officials Asking for expressions of interest of trainers 10/15 TORs 10/20 Obtainingproposals from 5 providers 10/27 2/20 Contractswith trainers 2/22 Advance to trainers 2/24 Preparationof draft training materials by trainers 3/8 Exercises in understanding the Manual 3/8 How to train facilitators 3/15 Select training venues 1/30 Training of trainers 3/22-31 Train consultants,(officials), facilitators in provincial workshops, program aspects West Java and Jakarta (5 teams) 4/9 East Java (5 teams) Central Java and Yogyakarta (5 teams) Other (?) Training of facilitators in bookkeeping,etc. WJ 4/16 EJ CJ Facilitators and consultants to be availablein Kelurahan WJ 4/19 -5/3 EJ CJ Managementconsultants Advertise for expressions of interest 10/6 Prepare TORs, LOI and evaluation criteria 10/10 Prepare draft contract 2/20 Receive expressions of interest 10/30 Short list of firms and nol 2/20 Invite bids 2/21 Hold explanationmeeting 2/25 Receivebids 3/22 Evaluate bids 3/26 Bank's nol 3/31 Notify winner 12/11 Negotiate contract 4/2 Bank nol 4/9 Final contract 4/12 Bank nol 4/14 Advance by MoF 4/19 Mobilizationof consultants 5/1 Prepare data base format for the project 5/30 Bank processing steps Project Concept Document issued 6/15 PCD review meeting 6/30 Drafting appraisal report 8/7 Draft Loan Agreement 8/7 Review by task team 8/12 Issue package 8/14 Decision meeting 8/31 Clearance for appraisal and negotiations 9/16 Appraisal start 9/28 Indonesia: Urban PovertyProject PAD Page 50 Actual Foreseen Appraisal completion memo 10/2 Invitation to negotiate/statusof negotiations 10/7 Negotiationsstart 10/22 Preparationof negotiations completion memo 10/26 RevisedPID 10/27 Requestfor IDA 12/21 Credit agreementdraft 2/10 Board approval of IDA for Indonesia 3/9 Approval of GOI of negotiated "credit" documents 3/10 Board presentation 3/23 or 4/1 Signingof Credit Agreement 4/2 (Wash) or 4/12 (Jakarta) Credit effectiveness 5/2 (earliest) Urban Poverty PirojectSchedule 1908 20011 ' 4> -7 -¾A. -'- A 4•. .... "'iPrearav...... EstaWlhmat Stageby Eclao nStage I anh tg 2 and vaeato at Stag. Iand 2and CeatdtoeDvennetd C.KRMAS dMfr ESpAJIM UVt iAAi.. ~~~~~~~~Stage~~~~~NMC, 0C Prprtnta tg L..anatiatStgeSeale Stages S .g Eansoad rjn npen ei 4 cruit Pmqu~alif an shr xs'rCs i~ Reri 0 n ndFnttti 4t t- I dtlr,5 CII ______ recoit regnaifyanahdCst for Stage 1 contrct with OCttor Stag 1IM...... Cnotracwith OCsta Stage2 PreparatonTeam RevlFclttrPeider - recmit -- Nepotiatioeand direct Appointment TrainingNPovidersi) Bank's NOL Contastswith Training providers prepareSionafterait aeawftentten togatics Trainingproviders Wtrtshnptar Training ProvidersL.2.u. pirepareF.aciitat.orsCompiling Trainieg Modules. andGev. Stagf si Recrit andtrain FacilitatornhApparot byTP ------PrOetStrIt up Vodkstropo. Recruitand Itrai reanngtciatryOCs - PrepartbanTeam P aitetva M :i-recuiNMC 01 Biddingand evatloitn BanksNOL NMC.sContrast P-M))_ecuitMOCb(sj Recrit Contactwith IVEC(s) tlompementiton StyeI-atrKlc70 pop.(1300Kelarah.n) _h- inS stages IStage 2- Panturac7itit(1540)------taga 3- SouthJava (1450) , Ty ain --- byO Astivifiesin Secialisehationneuohe y0 Kelurahssim Drsse~minahonby Fsaciitators Formationot KSM, BKM, etc Pen eeagnMatedi Pelatrhanoleh KMW Recrit, soclatseand train -last belch teaiti(tator eovn ui ComplilleKSM & BKMprupoes flili Imt,lemevlatiavot KSMI_SKM actisities mp pn q q ______PrepareGovnvmmet StaRf PrepareO&M arrngements 1____H h t -Supervision51fimplementaitl on....mu .. r FormUrban Forum at Thil (kec.in Jakarta)..L- ~.s EvaluatinI Reporing Adjustment __ o -1o oj _> Completionot JCrdiat impn et0nwidC tr- PM))INMC's Developand impl ement I mainastiiti.s 4) FormraLEtaluLhnepest Adjusten I1poetdesigntar next SIege P~repamLbninandlaanh of projectnest Stago Catatan i - ______51 Lihatladwal_tnitnc_U ~natnKagiatan FasiltaterPrvirder _ Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 52 ANNEX 12 Format UPP SUBPROJECTIMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT No...... IN KABUPATEN KECAMATAN KELURAHAN SPAPBNo.: / /199 Date: Location: A. We the undersigned: I. PjOK*: Name: ...... Title: ...... Agency/address:...... 2. Representativeof Name . subproject group**: Title:. Address: * authorized to act on behalf of the Government of Dati II by assignment letter dated ...... , No. ** Lurah in the case of infrastructure subprojects B. Both parties agree: i. Subproject definition. The beneficiary group will undertake the activities as described in the attached proposal # . that is an integral part of this agreement. All group members are collectively responsible. General conditions of the agreement, overleaf 2. Cost and financing total cost: Rp. financing: self financing: cash Rp. in kind:Rp. from kelurahan grant, Rp. advance from grant: Rp ...... upon agreement signing interim payment: Rp...... upon approval of progress reports final payment: Rp.(20%, upon subproject completion) expected completion date ...... Grant financing to be available from KF BRI account: Address: ...... Account No.: ...... (5 copiesof agreement,I copywith Rp. 2,000duty stampfor KPKN) Signed by group members overleaf Group representative PjOK Page 53 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD C. General Conditions of the Agreement Duties of the Kelurahan Forum leader/ Lurah I. The Kelurahan Forum and/or Lurah shall ensure a) the group members are eligible, b) that the subproject has been selected in accordance with the program criteria; c) that the OC has countersignedthe proposal; d) that cumulative approved subproject funding does not exceed the kelurahan grant. Duties of the CormnunityGroup 1. Implement the activities in accordance with the proposals, and the envirommentaland resettlement guidelines, as necessary, attached to the agreement.Provide own funds in the amounts and timing as indicated in the proposal. 2. Project Reporting: the KF agrees to provide a 2 page progress report every month to the PjOK, and allow other government,World Bank and other representatives to access records and visit the sites. A short completion report will be prepared. 3. If an activity is not carried out after funds are received, 3.a. If due to Force Majeure, that is an event which obstructs or damages work outside the control of the group, such an event must be reported to the oversight consultantwithin 7 days, and a decision taken within 14 days. 3.b. If a trigger benchmark indicates that it is better to drop the activity, such a decision must be reported to the oversightconsultant within 7 days and a decision taken within 14 days. 3.c. If due to negligence, the oversight consultant shall review and deternine the course of action; the advance may have to be reimbursed by the group immediately as to be determiined. 3.d. In all cases, the second (final) disbursementwill be revised. 4. Audits: the KF/groups have to allow audits as decided by BPKP; if audits indicate that funds were misused (i.e., for other purposes than intended), then the group has to reimburse the amount, or failing this. For the purpose of the audit, the KF/groups will keep Statements of expendituresrelated to the project for 3 years after its completion or decisionto abandon. Duties of the oversight consultant at the kecamatan/kabupaten 1. The consultantshall a) verify subprojectproposal and assist with preparation;b) supervise implementation; c) certify payment documentation. 2. Differences of opinion that may occur between the group/ KF and the Facilitator should be brought inimediately for discussion with the oversight consultant, who should settle such differences based on factual evidence and the Agreement. If they entail costs justified in the opinion of the consultant due to changes of original specifications, then an Agreement addendum has to be prepared. 3. Releaseof any advance requires prior compliancewith any land acquisition and a satisfactory environmentalplan if any is required for the subproject. Any required UKL/UPL would be given public disclosure and a conununity consultationwill be sought, and noted. Progress payments also depend on implementation of the environmentalplan, if any. Indonesia:Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 54 UPP SUBPROJECTPROPOSAL NO. Group members Name Address Signature 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9...... Page 55 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD UPP SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL NO. FORECONOMIC ACTIVITIES BY THECOMMUNITY OR FORSMALL WORKS/SUPPLIES BY THE COMMUNITY IN KABUPATEN KECAMATAN KELURAHAN- Date: Details on the following are summarized on following pages: 1. SubprojectDescription: 2. Implementationarrangements: 3. Procurementplan: 4. Land acquisition: 5. Environmentimpact: 6. Cost, by item and fimding source 1/: 7. Schedule for implementation and funding: 8. Repayment schedule and amounts: 9. Benchmarks,cancellation triggers: 10. Group members: 11. Treasurer of group/bookkeeper: 12. Location of subproject and group address: 13. Small Public Works: Additional General Conditions of Agreement apply. 1/ Including Group technical assistant fees as to be agreed, if any; profit sharing terms would be indicated, if any. 2% Kelurahan Forum administration fee Conformed by: Oversight Consultant Kelurahan Forum Leader Lurah Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 56 ADDITIONALGENERAL CONDITIONS FOR SMALL WORKS C. I. Duties of the Group or KF for works a) Implementthe works in accordance with the specifications approvedby the oversigh consultant. b) Provide local management (team leader, foreman, administration) and pay at appropriate cost based on the agreement. C.2. The works shall not be contracted without approval from the oversight consultant. C.3. Non-compliance The group/KF shall be judged negligent if it does not comply with general clauses or does not obey the warnings of the Facilitator/Consultant. The oversight consultant shall give written notice to the grouplKF of any non-compliance and send copy to the managementconsultant and to the PjOK. If within 15 days of receiving a warning the group/KF leader takes no corrective action, then the Facilitator may propose a KF meeting to review the matter. C.4. Sanctions In relation to negligence, payments to the group/KF shall be postponed until the cause of negligence is correctedand accepted by the consultant in accordance with the Agreement. C.5. Payment for the works shall be based on the amount of works certified by the consultant in accordance with the Agreement or addendum if any. C.6. Reporting by the group/KF a) Weeklypersonnel records b) Weeklyequipment records c) Weeklyprogress of works d) Monthly cumulativeprogress Page 57 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD Documentationfor Procurementto be used in Kelurahans (for contract values between Rp. 10 million and Rp. 100 million) FORSMALL WORKS/SUPPLIES BY CONTRACTORS TABLEOF CONTENTS Invitation to Bid and Instructions to Bidders...... 1 General Conditionsof Contract ...... 2 Sample Form of Quotation ... 3...... 3 Sample Form of Contract/Work Order ...... 4 General Specifications...... 5 (to be developedper nature of works) 1. INVITATIONTO BID 1.I Works: 1.2 Kabupaten/Kecamatan/Kelurahan: Date No. 1.3 AppointmentProcedure Activity Location Date Hour Remark 1.3.1 Collect Bid Document KF Free of Charge 1.3.2 Explain Documents idem Site Visit 1.3.3 Submit Bid idem Duty Stamps Rp.2000 1.3.4 Evaluate/Negotiate idem 1.3.5 Appoint contractor idem Duty Stamps 1.3.6 Sign Contract idem Rp.2000 2. INSTRUCTIONTO BIDDERS 2.0 The contractor will be selected after review of 3 quotations from different sources for local shopping and 1 quotation for direct contracting, contract values cannot exceed Rp.10 million for direct contracting and Rp. 50,000,000 for local shopping. 2.1 Quotation Form attached. 2.2 Contract Form attached. 2.3 Attachmentto the Quotation Form: Schedule of Activities and Prices 2.4 Contract Period: Up to 6 months from the date of signing of Contract. 2.5 Type of Contract: Unit Price or Lump Sum, without escalation. 2.6 Payment for Achievement (output): Semi-Monthly: After certification for works completed in 2 week period; the last payment, after issuing a Certificate of Hand-over. Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 58 3. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF IMPLEMENTATIONAGREEMENT WITH CONTRACTORS/SUPPLIERS 3.1. Duties of the contract/owner/oversightconsultant a) Supervise implementationof works. b) Arrange payment documentsfor work performed. d) Accept completed works. 3.2. Duties of the Supplier a) Implement the works in accordance with the specifications and technical guidelines provided by the oversight consultant. b) Provide materials, equipment and personnel; unskilled personnel will be selectedfrom kelurahan residents to the extent they are interested. 3.3. The works shall not be contracted without approval from the oversight consultant. 3.4. The Supplier must obey existing rules and regulations, and respect local customs. 3.5. Force Majeure is an event outside the control of the KF which obstructs or damages the work. Such an event must be reported to the Facilitator within 7 days. The oversight consultant may agree to costs resulting therefrom, and prepare an agreement addendum if needed. 3.6. Differences of opinion that may occur between the Supplier and the group should be brought for discussion with the Facilitatorimmediately. Settlement of such differences shall be decided by the consultant based on factual evidence and the Agreement. If they entail costs justified in the opinion of the consultant due to changes of original specifications,then a contract addendumhas to be prepared. 3.7. Non-complianceby the Supplier The Supplier shall be judged negligent if it does not comply with clauses 3.2. or 3.4. or does not obey the warnings of the Contract Owner or Facilitator. The KF or consultant shall give written notice to the Supplier of any non- compliance. 3.8. Sanctions a) In relation to negligence of the Supplier under clause 3.7., payments to the Supplier shall be postponed until the cause of negligence is corrected and accepted by the KF or Facilitator in accordance with the Contract. b) If within 7 days of receiving a warning under clause 3.7. the Supplier takes no corrective action, the KF may terminate the contract and appoint a third party to carry it out. 3.9. Payment for the works shall be based on the amount of works certified by the KF/consultant in accordance with the contract or addendum if any, 3.10. Reporting by the Supplier a) Weekly personnel records. b) Weeklyequipment record. c) Weekly progress of works. d) Monthly cumulativeprogress. Attachment I -Bid Form Attachment 2 - Agreement Form Page59 Indonesia:Urban Poverty Project:PAD QUOTATIONfor INVITATION#...... To: The ProjectManager (PjOK) of the UrbanPoverty Project 1. Having examinedthe QuotationDocuments, comprising the Invitation to Bid, the Instructionto Bidders, the General Conditionsand TechnicalGuidelines in the Project Manual, related to the followingworks: Description of Works I/Wethe undersignedoffer to implementthe wholeof the said worksin conformitywith the aforesaid documentsfor the sumof: Rp1 (in words) As detailedin the Attachmentto the Quotationshowing schedule of Activitiesand 2. I/We undertaketo commencethe works on the date of signingthe Contractand to completeand to hand-overthe workscomprised in the contractwithin the periodstated in the bid document. 3. ThisQuotation is valid for one monthfrom its date. Date: SupplierName: _ Address: SupplierSignature Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project PAD Page 60 UPP CONTRACT AGREEMENT for WORK/SUPPLIESby CONTRACTORS KF: Address: SPABP No.: Date: ImplementationAgreement No.: Date: IN KABUPATEN KECAMATAN KELURAHAN No.: / /199 Date: Location: A. We, the undersigned: 1. NAME: TITLE: Project Manager of the Works-KF ADDRESS: J1. hereinafterreferred to as the FIRST PARTY. Authorized to act on behalf of the GovernmentDati II Kabupaten as Employer, by assignment letter dated: No.: 2. NAME: (Supplier) TITLE: (Director) ADDRESS: 31. hereinafter referred to as the SECOND PARTY. B. Both parties agree to enter into Contract as the result of tendering:: a. Type of Works: b. Location: c. Description: d. Value of Agreement: Rp. in words) e. Execution-period: calendar days from the date of signing the agreement, without warranty period. f. Payment: Up to 20% advance to be netted out of payments of the first 2 months. Payments every 2 weeks proportional to physical progress as stated in bills certified by the consultant and the fmnalhand-over. h. Conditionfor Execution: As stated in the attached General Conditions of Agreement i. Miscellaneous: - 5 copies of agreement, I copy with Rp. 2,000 duty stamp for KPKN. - Copy of contract shall be sent to PjOK. SECOND PARTY FIRST PARTY Acknowledged by Supplier KF/group Consultant ( __ _ _) ( __ _ _) (__ ) Page 61 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project:PAD ANNEX 13 URBAN POVERTYPROJECT LAND ACQUISITIONAND RESETTLEMENTGUIDELINES Introduction GOI regulations relevant to land acquisition, resettlement and compensation, that would guide the agencies for this project as they do for others, are: a) Keppres 55/1993 pertaining to land provision for development for public interest; b) Implementing Regulation for Keppres 55/1993, #1/1994 of the Min.of Agri./Nat'l Land Agency (BPN); c) Regulation 4/1991 of the Min.of Land/head of BPN regarding land consolidation; d) Letter 410-4245/1991of the Min. of Land /head of BPN, and e) Circular 410-1078/1996 of the Min.of Agriculture/head of BPN on technical guidelines for land consolidation. In general, where a proposal entails land or asset acquisition,the project agency/group shall ensure that any persons affected negatively by the proposed subproject are compensated such that their incomes and assets are restored or improved under the subproject. Basic principles The basic principles for the project are: i) proposals should avoid or minimize land and asset acquisition as well as involuntary resettlement. They should have explored viable alternative designs to minimize displacement. ii) under approved proposals, any negatively affected person, under any tenure category, should be given fair compensation determined through consultation and agreement between the affected party and the project group. iii) the affected person should be able to choose the type of compensation, in the form of cash or in kind; the level should be based on current market prices or updated NJOP (tax base) values for their property, for cash compensations, and should provide land and housing at least equal to the replaced ones, when compensationis in kind. iv) proposals that would affect 200 persons or more require a full LARAP (land acquisition and resettlement action plan). (Such subprojects would normally entail long lead times, and are expected to be beyond the scope of the project.) v) there shall be no land acquisition under the project through land consolidationprocedures. Procedures i) proposals have to indicate the need for land acquisition, the estimated size and number of persons affected, and the estimated budget required for compensation. Such identification can be conducted in parallel with the AMDAL (see environmental guidelines). ii) proposals approved in principle by the consultant that require land acquisition, shall be complemented as necessary with a LARAP (Land acquisition and resettlement action plan) and indication of the budget source for the required compensation (proceeds of the kelurahan grant cannot be used for compensation), carry the approval by the relevant kabupaten agency head. The consultant shall seek the Bank's approval of the LARAP and budget, and seek modifications in case the Bank finds they are needed. iii) any LARAP or compensation shall be completed satisfactorily prior to the start of any construction work. The implementing group will report progress regularly to the PMU, that in turn will inform the Bank. Sanctions If it is found that the guidelines were not complied with, then funding for the subproject will be cancelled and the Kelurahan will not be eligible for any other financingunder the project. Page 62 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project: PAD ANNEX 14 URBAN POVERTY PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES Introduction The proposed project has been classified-as a Bank environmental category B, as any negative impacts are expected to be minor. Any physical works under the project are expected to be small, and their impact, positive on the municipalities. GOI regulations relevant to environmental management, that would guide the agencies for this project as they do for others, are: i) GovernmentRegulation Number 51 of 1993 Regarding EnvironmentalImpact Assessment; ii) KEP-39/MENLHJ8/1996Concerning the Types of Businesses or Activities Required to prepare an Environmental ImpactAssessment (ANDAL); iii) KEPMEN PU-481/KPTS/1996Concerning Decisions on the Types of Activities in the Field of Public Works that are Required to Prepare UPL and UKL; iv) KEP-12/MENLHI3/1994Concerning General Guidelines for EnvironmentalManagement and MonitoringProcedures; v) KEPMEN PU No. 296/KPTS/1996Technical Guidelines on the Preparation of UKL and UPL for Projects in the Field of Public Works; vi) KEP-14/MENLH/3/1994Concerning General Guidelines for the Preparationof EnvironmentalImpact Assessments; vii) KEPMEN PU No. 58/KPTS/1995 Concerning Establishment of Guidelines for the Management of AMDAL in the Department of Public Works. The Bank's Operational Directive on Environmental Assessment (O.D.4.01), which in general is in line with GOI's AMDAL process for public projects, shall also be followed by the agencies where a proposal entails any negative environmental impact, to ensure that it is mitigated or avoided satisfactorily. No new environmental management procedures are proposed. The Bank also requires public disclosure of environmental reports (BP 17.50, Disclosure of Operational Information). Basic principles The basic environmental principles are: i) proposals should avoid or minimize negative environmental impacts. They should have explored viable alternative designs to minimize the impact; ii) the proposal should fit into the General Spatial Plan (RUTR), and avoid protected areas so designated by the Ministry of the Environment (attachment 1 to this annex) unless the proposal improved a protected area; iii) proposals entailing a negative environmental impact, shall be complemented by an environmental plan to mitigate the impact. Procedures Tnere are three key stages (studies for the proposal, design and implementation), all three involving public consultation. The procedures at each stage are summarized below (a checklist for the agency is in attachment 2): In an initial screening, the project type, scale, location, and sensitivity, and the nature and magnitude of potential impacts, will be identified to classify the proposal in one of 4 categories: i) those that require environmental management and monitoring plans (UKL and UPL)based on limited but site specific studies. The Ministry of Public Works has set criteria to determine the need for UKL/UPL, and the Page 63 Indonesia: Urban Poverty Project; PAD Ministry of the Environment has set criteria for ANDAL. Both sets are combined in attachment 2 to this annex; ii) those for which standard operating procedures (SOP) suffice, where generic good practice would protect the environment adequately. DG Cipta Karya and DG Bina Marga have SOP guidelines for some types of projectsl; iii) those that require no environmental study, where no construction, disturbance of land or water or discharge of pollutants are involved; iv) those that require a full environmental assessment (ANDAL) plus environmental management plan (RKL), unless the ANDAL and the RKL were the innovations (due to the small financing for the proposals, none is expectedto be in this category for implementation). In the design stage: i) the fit with urban planning and the environmental study, if these are needed, should be approved by the Bappeda and Bapedalda prior to submissionto the PMU; ii) the environmental managementshould be incorporated into the designs, tender documents and contracts; iii) standard field inspection, operating guidelines and management and monitoring for municipality staff (or private sector operators) should be clear; iv) the institutional arrangements for implementationand funding sources should be indicated in the proposal. Implementationwould proceed after the proposal is approved by the PMU and the Bank, Public participation For projects for which ANDALs must be prepared, GOI's regulations require public disclosure of information about the project and opportunities for public comments before a final decision is taken. There are no provisions for public participation in UKL/UPL preparation. The Bank requires public disclosure also of UKL/lUPLs, and encourages participation of NGOs and affected communities in all project planning. Municipalities are advised to provide a mechanism to receive and respond to complaints from the public for any subproject that may cause environmental or social impacts. Attachment 1 List of Protected Areas The Decree of the Minister of State for the Environmentof the Republic of Indonesia Number KEP- 39/MENLH/8/1996Concerning the Types of Businesses or Activities Required to Complete an Environmental Impact Assessmentprescribes that any business or activity that is located in a protected area or that may change the purpose and/or designation of a protected area shall be required to prepare an ANDAL. It includes: i) forest protection areas: i) river edges; ii) marine/freshwaterconservation areas; ii) nature tourism parks; iii) peat areas; iii) areas surroundinglakes and reservoirs; iv) coastal mangrove areas; iv) cultural reserves; v) water catchment areas; v) areas surroundingsprings; vi) national parks; vi) scientific research areas; vii) coastal edges; vii) nature conservation areas; viii) forestparks; viii) areas susceptible to natural hazards. Such as measuresto controldust, noise and trafficat constructionsites, specifications for backfillingand revegetating disturbedareas to preventerosion; procedures to controlnegative impacts at solidwaste transfer stations; etc. Indonesia: U,oan PLovroy Proj,ct PAD Page 64 Subprojezt Sle enlig Criteria Sectors au Pdrojects Units ANDAL UKL/UPL Wratr S ugply ______::______Raw water intake s 500 500 - 100 Transmission (large towns) km 5 5 -2 Distribution (large towns) ha 1500 1500- 250 roads.Urban :_ _ .______:___ __L_::__ _ _ _ New construction: a. Large towns km; or ha 5 5 - 1; or 5 - 2 b. Medium towns km 10 10 - 3 c. Small towns (villages) km 25 25 - 5 widening (large towns) km; or ha 5 5 - 1; or 5 - 2 (if land acquisition) Bridges in large towns m - 2 20 Bridges in small towns m - 2 60 Wastewater & sanitiidon I IPLT ha 10 10-5 Sewerage system ha 500 500 - 100 IPAL ha 10 10 - 5 -Solid Waste Management I ______Sanitary landfill (TPA) m3d 1000 1000 - 200 TPA (in tidal area) m3 /d 700 700 - 150 Transfer station m3/d 2000 2000 - 500 Drainage & floodcontrol ____i_:_ a. In large towns km; or ha 5 5 - 1; or 5 - 2 b. In medium towns km 10 10 - 3 c. In small towns (villages) km 25 25 - 5 Kapung Improvement =E___i______New development ha 200 200 - 25 Upgrading ha 5 5-2 Sources: KEP-39/ME4NLHI8/1996for ANDAL KEPMENPU-48 1/KPTS/1996 for UKL/UPL Attachment 2 Environmental Checklist for Appraisal i) Has the subprojectbeen properly screened in accordance with criteria in Attachment 2? ii) Has the appropriate environmentalstudy been prepared and approvedby the environmentalagency concerned? iii) Are any environment-relatedlicenses or permnitsrequired (e.g. H.O.?) and, if so, have they been issued? iv) Does the study include an adequate description of the subproject,with maps and drawings as appropriate? v) Does the study describe the aspects of the environmentthat could be adversely affected by the subproject and identify all of the likely impacts? vi) Do the managementand monitoringplans (UKL/UPL) contain specific, clearly defined actions to respond to all potential adverse impacts of the subproject? vii) Is the implementingagency identified for each action in the UKL and UPL, and are the funding source and budgetary commitmnentclear? viii) Has the municipality accepted the recommendationsin the environmentalstudy and agreed to implement them? ix) Do plans, contracts and tender documents contain the appropriate elements of the UKL/UPL or SOP? x) Were adequate opportunities provided for the public participation in subproject planning and cormment on the study? MAP SECTION PACiFiC OCEAN ~~INDONESIA-JAWA LAY S~hA_.~a URBAN POVERTY PROJECT KABUPATENSK(JAWMABARAT)KBPTN(JWTEGPROJECT KABUPATENS II AS 0 ~~~~~~~~~~~PROJECTKABUPATENS ® PROVINCE(PROPINSI) CAPITALS INDIANOCEAN ® ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~NATIONALCAPITAL A~~~ US RALIA ~~~~~~~~~~~~DISTRICT- (KABUPATEN)BOUNDARIES PROVINCE(PROPINSI) BOUNDARIES 1050 0010018 SUMA R 1090gon G} 110ieon10iacp1.Suoaie 1110cta 112. 113dwos 21140o 1~~~~~~~~~DKI er.!27 Sampang 70 Garut Karawang 7.2Wonosobo ,7. Rembong 27. Pemalong ;Z. Malong 17. Jombo KABUPATE NS 3. Boqor 13. Sumedang3. Purbalingga 13. Karanganyar 23. Temanrqgung 3. Trenggalek 13. Probolinggohundaee, lere desenietioeTubaanaandany ihe. 4. Sukabumi 4 4.Indramayu Baniarnegara 14. Sragen 24 Kenda 4. Tulungogung 14. Posuruan espdnoln,pIn24. e theparLamongaennhhof he orldBan oran (D.I. YOGYAKARTA) 5. Cianjur 15 Subonq5. Kebumen 15. Grobogan 25 Batung 5. Blitar 15. Sidoarioa. ny ed~entn se ega25. sttesof Gresik~~~~Ga nyesiery 1.Kulon Progo 1 OYKRA3 ''oBL 2 Bantul 3 Gunung Kidul10018 0'101101213010 4 Sleman KABUPATENS(JAWA BARAT) KABUPATENS(JAWA TENGAH) KABUPATENS(JAWA TIMUR) 1.Pandeglang 11. Cirebon 1. Cilacap I11.Sukoharjo 21. Demak 1. Pacitan 11. Bondowoso 21. Ngawi 2. Lebak 12. Maialenka 2. Banyumas 12.Wonogiri 22 Semarang 2. Ponorogo 12. Situbondo 22. Bajonegoro 3. Bogor 13. Sumedang 3. PurBalingga 13. Karanganyar 23. Temanbgung 3. Trenmbalek 13. Probolinggo 93. Tuban . eran 4.4uni Baniarnegara 1. Sra 24Kenda A. Tulungagung 14. Pasuruan 2A. Lamongan Sukiabnlumi 14 Indrm 5. Kebumen 15. Grobogan 25. Batang 5. Blitar 15. Sidoario 25. Gresik 5.Canung wuanprt 6. Purworeo 16. Blora 26 Pekalongan 6Keii1.Mokro 26. Bangkalan ~ Ban~~~g16. PurwaKarta7. Wonosobo i17 Rembang 27. Pemalang 7. Malang 17. Jombang 27. Sampang 7. Garut I /. Karawang 8 aeag IaPf 8. Tasikmalaya eai .Mglag1 Pt , , Tegal 8. Lumajang 18. Nganj'uk 23 aeaa 9. Ciamis 19. Tangerang 9. Boyolali 19.Kudus 29 Brebes 9. Jember 19. Madiun 29. Sumenep ~~ 10. Kuningan20 Serang 10. Klaten 20 Jepara 10. Banyuwangi 20. Magetan 30 Kodya Surabaya to c0o 10