DOCSLIB.ORG

Initial Study Appendix B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Initial Study Appendix B Uvas Road at Little Uvas Creek Bridge Replacement Project Biological Assessment Biological Assessment Uvas Road over Little Uvas Creek Bridge Replacement Project (37C-0095/37C-0601 [new]) Near Morgan Hill, Santa Clara County, California 04-SCL-0-CR Federal Project Number BRLO 5937(124) Caltrans District 04 November 2015 Biological Assessment Uvas Road over Little Uvas Creek Bridge Replacement Project (37C-0095/37C-0601 [new]) Near Morgan Hill, Santa Clara County, California 04-SCL-0-CR Federal Project Number BRLO 5937(124) Caltrans District 04 November 2015 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation and Santa Clara County Roads and Airports Department Prepared By: ___________________________________ Date: ____________ Patrick Boursier, Principal (408) 458-3204 H. T. Harvey & Associates Los Gatos, California Approved By: ___________________________________ Date: ____________ Solomon Tegegne, Associate Civil Engineer Santa Clara County Roads and Airports Department Highway and Bridge Design 408-573-2495 Concurred By: ___________________________________ Date: ____________ Tom Holstein Environmental Branch Chief Office of Local Assistance Caltrans, District 4 Oakland, California 510-286-5250 For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in Braille, large print, on audiocassette, or computer disk. To obtain a copy in one of these alternate formats, please call or write to the Santa Clara County Roads and Airports Department: Solomon Tegegne Santa Clara County Roads and Airports Department 101 Skyport Drive San Jose, CA 95110 408-573-2495 Summary of Findings, Conclusions and Determinations Summary of Findings, Conclusions and Determinations The Uvas Road at Little Uvas Creek Bridge Replacement Project (proposed project) is proposed by the County of Santa Clara Roads and Airports Department in cooperation with the Office of Local Assistance of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and this Biological Assessment (BA) has been prepared following Caltrans’ procedures. The Uvas Road Bridge crosses Little Uvas Creek along Uvas Road. It is located west of the city of Morgan Hill, approximately 200 feet (ft) north of the Uvas Road and Little Uvas Road intersection. It is located approximately 4 miles (mi) west of the town of Morgan Hill, and approximately 15 mi southwest of the City of San Jose, in unincorporated Santa Clara County, California. The basic elements of the Uvas Road at Little Uvas Creek Bridge Replacement Project include removing the existing narrow, Functionally Obsolete (FO) bridge (37C-0095) built in 1928, as it does not meet current design standards and traffic demands, and is also an impediment to flood flows in Little Uvas Creek for both the 50-year and 100- year storms. The proposed project would replace the existing bridge with a new, wider bridge that can accommodate two lanes of traffic with shoulders, realign the Uvas Road approaches to the new bridge, and install retaining walls (or other slope protection measures) at the new bridge abutments. The new bridge will be approximately 90 ft in length and approximately 43 ft in width, including two 12-ft lanes and two 8-ft shoulders. Excavation for the new bridge abutments will be to a depth of approximately 10 ft. The replacement bridge will be realigned by approximately 20 ft, angled east and west (upstream and downstream) of the current alignment of the existing bridge. The new bridge will be a single span pre-cast/pre- stressed I-girders and cast-in-place concrete deck structure, supported on seat type abutments with standard wingwalls, and will include concrete barrier rails and tubular hand railing. The purpose of this BA is to provide technical information and to review the proposed Project in sufficient detail to determine the extent to which the proposed Project may affect species listed or proposed as threatened or endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA), as well as to determine the extent to which the proposed Project may affect designated or proposed critical habitat for these species. This BA focuses on the only federally listed species that have any potential to be affected by the Project, the federally threatened California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense) and California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii), and the federally endangered least Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus). Uvas Road Bridge over Little Uvas Creek BA v Summary of Findings, Conclusions and Determinations The California red-legged frog breeds in the Project vicinity and may occur within the biological study area (BSA). Red-legged frogs are not expected to breed in the BSA due to high flows that can occur in that reach of Little Uvas Creek during portions of the breeding season, and the relative lack of suitable breeding habitat on Little Uvas Creek in the BSA. Red-legged frogs are more likely to use the BSA as dispersal habitat or nonbreeding foraging habitat. Thus, construction activities associated with the Project could result in the direct loss and disturbance of California red-legged frogs and their dispersal and foraging habitat. The proposed project would result in impacts to 5.02 ac of red-legged frog habitat, including the permanent loss of 2.74 ac of aquatic and upland dispersal habitat and the temporary loss of 2.28 ac of aquatic habitat for foraging, and upland habitat for cover and dispersal. However, approximately 1.24 ac of existing asphalt along Uvas Road would be removed by the proposed project, and these areas would be restored to grassland. As a result, the net permanent loss of potential California red-legged frog aquatic and upland refugial/dispersal habitat will total approximately 1.50 ac. Suitable breeding habitat for the California tiger salamander is absent from the BSA, but several ponds within 0.25 mi may be used for breeding by this species. The BSA contains upland habitat that could provide refugial and dispersal habitat for California tiger salamanders that might be breeding in these off-site ponds. Thus, construction activities associated with the proposed project could result in the direct loss and disturbance of California tiger salamanders and their dispersal and refugial habitat. The proposed project could result in impacts to as much as 5.02 ac of tiger salamander habitat, including the permanent loss of approximately 2.74 ac of potential tiger salamander refugial/dispersal habitat, and temporary impacts to approximately 2.28 ac of potential tiger salamander habitat. However, approximately 1.24 ac of existing asphalt along Uvas Road would be removed by the proposed project, and these areas would be restored to grassland. As a result, the net permanent loss of potential California tiger salamander upland refugial/dispersal habitat would total approximately 1.50 ac. The least Bell’s vireo is not known to breed or occur within the proposed project vicinity, and assessment of habitat by H.T. Harvey biologists indicates that there is a lack of suitable breeding habitat for the least Bell’s vireo within the BSA. Therefore, the species is not expected to occur within the BSA, and the proposed project would not impact least Bell’s vireo habitat, least Bell’s vireo populations, or individual least Bell’s vireos. Uvas Road Bridge over Little Uvas Creek BA vi Summary of Findings, Conclusions and Determinations The proposed project will be considered a “covered project” under the Santa Clara Valley Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan (“VHCP”). The VHCP defines measures to avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts on covered species and their habitats while allowing for the implementation of certain covered activities. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is a signatory of the VHCP, which will provide incidental take approval for the proposed project’s impacts to federally listed species via Section 10 of the FESA. In conformance with the VHCP, the proposed project proponent will be required to pay impact fees in accordance with the types and acreage of habitat impacted, and to implement conservation measures specified by the VHCP. This BA therefore incorporates avoidance, minimization, and compensatory mitigation measures, including the payment of impact fees in lieu of habitat mitigation for impacts to sensitive species and regulated habitats, based on the final VHCP Inner City Fund International (ICF International 2012). Implementation of these measures will adequately avoid, minimize, and compensate for impacts to the California red-legged frog, California tiger salamander, and least Bell’s vireo. The following effects determinations have been made on the species assessed in this BA: California red-legged frog: May affect, likely to adversely affect California tiger salamander: May affect, likely to adversely affect Least Bell’s vireo: No effect The proposed project will not jeopardize the continued existence of any of these three species due to its very limited extent, the low numbers of individuals of these species that could be affected by the proposed project, and the avoidance, minimization, and compensatory mitigation measures that will be implemented in compliance with the VHCP. No critical habitat has been designated in the proposed project area for any of these three species, and thus the proposed project will not result in adverse modification of critical habitat. Uvas Road Bridge over Little Uvas Creek BA vii Table of Contents Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ray Grass Perenne Pdf
    Ray grass perenne pdf Continue Published in Temperate Climate and Cold Description: Unlike the annual rye grass, this variety is characterized by lasting over two years, being able to reach up to three or four years. It has a shallow fibrous radical system. It adapts to a temperate climate, does not tolerate high temperatures. Its growth is straight, with bright green leaves. It supports trampling, frost and is well competitive with other species. Soil: Suitable for all soils (except sandy soils), although it prefers fertile and moist soils and ph is close to neutrality. Nutrients and water: Requires irrigation, especially in summer and high fertilization. Shadow: Not suitable. Landing density: 3 to 15 kg / 100 m2. It is preferable to sow in early autumn, but can also be done in summer. Please note that the depth is no more than 2 cm. Cutting: 3 to 5 cm. Frequency: increased. Use: Widely used in parks and sports grounds, in mixes. It belongs to the family of grass, which is widely used all over the world and is considered one of the most valuable species of meadows. It is one of the most commonly used species both alone and in the mix. It has excellent tolerance to use, rapid germination (7 days in spring and 10 days in winter) and excellent installation speed. On the other hand, it is a species that is not drought-tolerant and requires high maintenance. Crossing different varieties has produced a wide range of varieties that differ in their characteristics, such as: tolerance to use, winter strength, color, resistance to disease and tolerance to heat and drought.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Northern California by Jean Richmond
    BIRDING NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Site Guides to 72 of the Best Birding Spots by Jean Richmond Written for Mt. Diablo Audubon Society 1985 Dedicated to my husband, Rich Cover drawing by Harry Adamson Sketches by Marv Reif Graphics by dk graphics © 1985, 2008 Mt. Diablo Audubon Society All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part by any means without prior permission of MDAS. P.O. Box 53 Walnut Creek, California 94596 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . How To Use This Guide .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Birding Etiquette .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Terminology. Park Information .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 One Last Word. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 Map Symbols Used. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 Acknowledgements .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 Map With Numerical Index To Guides .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 8 The Guides. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10 Where The Birds Are. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 158 Recommended References .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 165 Index Of Birding Locations. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 166 5 6 Birding Northern California This book is a guide to many birding areas in northern California, primarily within 100 miles of the San Francisco Bay Area and easily birded on a one-day outing. Also included are several favorite spots which local birders
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 9-17-2018 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park" (2018). Botanical Studies. 85. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/85 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE REDWOOD NATIONAL & STATE PARKS James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State Univerity Arcata, California 14 September 2018 The Redwood National and State Parks are located in Del Norte and Humboldt counties in coastal northwestern California. The national park was F E R N S established in 1968. In 1994, a cooperative agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation added Del Norte Coast, Prairie Creek, Athyriaceae – Lady Fern Family and Jedediah Smith Redwoods state parks to form a single administrative Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosporum • northwestern lady fern unit. Together they comprise about 133,000 acres (540 km2), including 37 miles of coast line. Almost half of the remaining old growth redwood forests Blechnaceae – Deer Fern Family are protected in these four parks.
    [Show full text]
  • AQ Conformity Amended PBA 2040 Supplemental Report Mar.2018
    TRANSPORTATION-AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Metropolitan Transportation Commission Association of Bay Area Governments MARCH 2018 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Jake Mackenzie, Chair Dorene M. Giacopini Julie Pierce Sonoma County and Cities U.S. Department of Transportation Association of Bay Area Governments Scott Haggerty, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover Alameda County Contra Costa County Bijan Sartipi California State Alicia C. Aguirre Anne W. Halsted Transportation Agency Cities of San Mateo County San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Libby Schaaf Tom Azumbrado Oakland Mayor’s Appointee U.S. Department of Housing Nick Josefowitz and Urban Development San Francisco Mayor’s Appointee Warren Slocum San Mateo County Jeannie Bruins Jane Kim Cities of Santa Clara County City and County of San Francisco James P. Spering Solano County and Cities Damon Connolly Sam Liccardo Marin County and Cities San Jose Mayor’s Appointee Amy R. Worth Cities of Contra Costa County Dave Cortese Alfredo Pedroza Santa Clara County Napa County and Cities Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cities of Alameda County Association of Bay Area Governments Supervisor David Rabbit Supervisor David Cortese Councilmember Pradeep Gupta ABAG President Santa Clara City of South San Francisco / County of Sonoma San Mateo Supervisor Erin Hannigan Mayor Greg Scharff Solano Mayor Liz Gibbons ABAG Vice President City of Campbell / Santa Clara City of Palo Alto Representatives From Mayor Len Augustine Cities in Each County City of Vacaville
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Ohlone Culture by Robert Cartier
    An Overview of Ohlone Culture By Robert Cartier In the 16th century, (prior to the arrival of the Spaniards), over 10,000 Indians lived in the central California coastal areas between Big Sur and the Golden Gate of San Francisco Bay. This group of Indians consisted of approximately forty different tribelets ranging in size from 100–250 members, and was scattered throughout the various ecological regions of the greater Bay Area (Kroeber, 1953). They did not consider themselves to be a part of a larger tribe, as did well- known Native American groups such as the Hopi, Navaho, or Cheyenne, but instead functioned independently of one another. Each group had a separate, distinctive name and its own leader, territory, and customs. Some tribelets were affiliated with neighbors, but only through common boundaries, inter-tribal marriage, trade, and general linguistic affinities. (Margolin, 1978). When the Spaniards and other explorers arrived, they were amazed at the variety and diversity of the tribes and languages that covered such a small area. In an attempt to classify these Indians into a large, encompassing group, they referred to the Bay Area Indians as "Costenos," meaning "coastal people." The name eventually changed to "Coastanoan" (Margolin, 1978). The Native American Indians of this area were referred to by this name for hundreds of years until descendants chose to call themselves Ohlones (origination uncertain). Utilizing hunting and gathering technology, the Ohlone relied on the relatively substantial supply of natural plant and animal life in the local environment. With the exception of the dog, we know of no plants or animals domesticated by the Ohlone.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Watsonville Historic Context Statement (2007)
    Historic Context Statement for the City of Watsonville FINAL REPORT Watsonville, California April 2007 Prepared by One Sutter Street Suite 910 San Francisco CA 94104 415.362.7711 ph 415.391.9647 fx Acknowledgements The Historic Context Statement for the City of Watsonville would not have been possible without the coordinated efforts of the City of Watsonville Associate Planner Suzi Aratin, and local historians and volunteers Ann Jenkins and Jane Borg whose vast knowledge and appreciation of Watsonville is paramount. Their work was tireless and dependable, and their company more than pleasant. In addition to hours of research, fact checking and editing their joint effort has become a model for other communities developing a historic context statement. We would like to thank the City of Watsonville Council members and Planning Commission members for supporting the Historic Context Statement project. It is a testimony to their appreciation and protection of local history. Thanks to all of you. Table of Contents Chapter Page 1.0 Background and Objectives 1 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Location and Boundaries of Study 1.3 Context Statement Objective 2.0 Methodology 5 2.1 Context Statement Methodology 2.2 Summary of Resources 3.0 Introduction to Historic Contexts 7 3.1 Summary of Historic Contexts 3.2 Summary of Regional History Before Incorporation 3.3 Summary of regional history from 1868 – 1960 4.0 Historic Context 1 - Municipal Development 17 4.1 Overview 4.2 History 4.2.1 Schools 4.2.2 Civic Institutions 4.2.3 Infrastructure: Water 4.2.4 Infrastructure:
    [Show full text]
  • 4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality
    Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail Network Master Plan EIR Section 4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality 4.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY 4.9.1 Setting a. Regional Hydrology. Watersheds. The MBSST Network would traverse through nearly every watershed in Santa Cruz County, and be located where the watersheds drain, due to its coastal location. A list of the watersheds within the MBSST Network is provided below. Because several watersheds fall within more than one reach of the MBSST Network, the watersheds are listed in order from north to south, rather than by reach. Waddell Baldwin Wilder Swanton Bluffs San Lorenzo River Scott Creek Arana Gulch – Rodeo Davenport Soquel Creek San Vicente Creek Aptos Creek Liddell Creek Pajaro River Laguna Creek Watsonville Slough Majors San Andreas The watersheds cover almost all of Santa Cruz County, except for the less than 20 acres that are within the Año Nuevo Creek Watershed and the Pescadero Watershed. Each watershed consists of numerous tributaries, with over 50 tributaries combined. All of these watersheds are within the jurisdiction of the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The RWQCB establishes requirements prescribing the quality of point and nonpoint sources of discharge and establishes water quality objectives through the Water Quality Control Plan for the local basin. A point source is defined as waste emanating from a single, identifiable point such as a wastewater treatment plant. A nonpoint source of discharge results from drainage and percolation of activities such as agriculture and stormwater runoff. Groundwater. Groundwater supplies account for approximately 80 percent of the countywide water supply.
    [Show full text]
  • © 2020 Hui Chen ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
    © 2020 Hui Chen ALL RIGHTS RESERVED TRAFFIC TOLERANCE OF FINE FESCUES: TECHNIQUES FOR SCREENING GERMPLASM by HUI CHEN A dissertation submitted to the School of Graduate Studies Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Plant Biology written under the direction of James A. Murphy and approved by ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey JANUARY 2020 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Traffic tolerance of fine fescues: Techniques for screening germplasm BY HUI CHEN Dissertation Director: Dr, James A. Murphy The term fine fescue refers to several Festuca spp. that have a very fine leaf texture compared to most other turfgrass species. These species are adapted to low-input management systems and have been used in mixtures with other cool-season grasses. However, fine fescues are not utilized to the same extent as other species partially due to their poor traffic tolerance and recuperative ability. Improvement in traffic tolerance of fine fescues would enable use of these grasses beyond turf systems that experience little to no traffic. The purpose of this dissertation was to develop and evaluate germplasm screening techniques that improve selecting efficiency for traffic tolerant fine fescues. The specific objectives of this research were: i) to evaluate the effect of traffic form (abrasive wear vs. cleated traffic) and season (spring vs. summer vs. autumn) on the assessment of fine fescue traffic tolerance (Chapters 1 and 2); ii) to evaluate the effect of nitrogen fertilization and harvest time on cell wall composition of fine fescues (Chapters 3 and 4); iii) to investigate the correlation between cell wall composition and wear tolerance of fine ii fescues; and iv) to develop near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) models to determine the cell wall composition of fine fescues.
    [Show full text]
  • 1982 Flood Report
    GB 1399.4 S383 R4 1982 I ; CLARA VAltEY WATER DISlRIDl LIBRARY 5750 ALMADEN EXPRESSYIAY SAN JOSE. CAUFORN!A 9Sll8 REPORT ON FLOODING AND FLOOD RELATED DAMAGES IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY January 1 to April 30, 1982 Prepared by John H. Sutcliffe Acting Division Engineer Operations Division With Contributions From Michael McNeely Division Engineer Design Division and Jeanette Scanlon Assistant Civil Engineer Design Division Under the Direction of Leo F. Cournoyer Assistant Operations and Maintenance Manager and Daniel F. Kriege Operations and Maintenance Manager August 24, 1982 DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS Arthur T. Pfeiffer, Chairman District 1 James J. Lenihan District 5 Patrick T. Ferraro District 2 Sio Sanchez. Vice Chairman At Large Robert W. Gross District 3 Audrey H. Fisher At large Maurice E. Dullea District 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCrfION .......................... a ••••••••••••••••••• 4 •• Ill • 1 STORM OF JANUARY 3-5, 1982 .•.•.•.•.•••••••.••••••••.••.••.••.••••. 3 STORMS OF MARCH 31 THROUGH APRIL 13, 1982 ••.....••••••.•••••••••••• 7 SUMMARY e • • • • • • • • • : • 111 • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1111 o e • e • • o • e • e o e • e 1111 • • • • • e • e 12 TABLES I Storm Rainfall Summary •••••••••.••••.•••••••.••••••••••••• 14 II Historical Rainfall Data •••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••• 15 III Channel Flood Flow Summary •••••.•••••.•••••••••••••••••••• 16 IV Historical Stream flow Data •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 17 V January 3-5, 1982 Damage Assessment Summary •••••••••••••••••• 18 VI March 31 - April 13, 1982 Damage
    [Show full text]
  • Biology Report
    MEMORANDUM Scott Batiuk To: Lynford Edwards, GGBHTD From: Plant and Wetland Biologist [email protected] Date: June 13, 2019 Verification of biological conditions associated with the Corte Madera 4-Acre Tidal Subject: Marsh Restoration Project Site, Professional Service Agreement PSA No. 2014- FT-13 On June 5, 2019, a WRA, Inc. (WRA) biologist visited the Corte Madera 4-Acre Tidal Marsh Restoration Project Site (Project Site) to verify the biological conditions documented by WRA in a Biological Resources Inventory (BRI) report dated 2015. WRA also completed a literature review to confirm that special-status plant and wildlife species evaluations completed in 2015 remain valid. Resources reviewed include the California Natural Diversity Database (California Department of Fish and Wildlife 20191), the California Native Plant Society’s Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (California Native Plant Society 20192), and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Information for Planning and Consultation database (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 20193). Biological Communities In general, site conditions are similar to those documented in 2015. The Project Site is a generally flat site situated on Bay fill soil. A maintained berm is present along the western and northern boundaries. Vegetation within the Project Site is comprised of dense, non-native species, characterized primarily by non-native grassland dominated by Harding grass (Phalaris aquatica) and pampas grass (Cortaderia spp.). Dense stands of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) are present in the northern and western portions on the Project Site. A small number of seasonal wetland depressions dominated by curly dock (Rumex crispus), fat hen (Atriplex prostrata) and brass buttons (Cotula coronopifolia) are present in the northern and western portions of the Project Site, and the locations and extent of wetlands observed are similar to what was documented in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • CREEK & WATERSHED MAP Morgan Hill & Gilroy
    POINTS OF INTEREST 1. Coyote Creek Parkway Trailhead. Coyote Creek Parkway is a remaining sycamores dot the landscape, creating a beautiful setting to Springs Trail to follow Center Creek into its headwater canyons. The trail paved trail following Coyote Creek for 15 miles from southern San Jose savor the streamside serenity. will eventually cross over into the headwaters of New Creek as it rises to Morgan Hill. Popular with walkers, bikers, equestrians, and skaters, toward the summit of Coyote Ridge, 1.5 miles from the trailhead. much of this trail passes through rural scenery. View riparian woodland 4. Anderson Dam and Reservoir. Anderson dam, built in 1950, species such as big-leaf maple, cottonwood, sycamore, willow, and impounds Coyote Creek, the largest stream in the Santa Clara Valley. The 12. Coyote Lake. Streams carry water and sediment from the hills to the coast live oak along the trail. The oaks produce acorns, which were an dam backs up a deep reservoir, which can store 90,000 acre-feet of water, ocean; damming a stream blocks the flow of both. Sediment typically important source of food to the Native Americans, and still serve many the largest reservoir in Santa Clara Valley. Like SCVWD’s nine other deposits where the stream first enters the lake, forming a broad plain Coyote animal species today. reservoirs built between 1935 and 1957, Anderson Reservoir’s major called a delta. From the county park campground, enjoy a beautiful view purpose is to store wintertime runoff for groundwater recharge during the of the delta of Coyote Creek, Coyote Lake, and the valley below.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovering California Steelhead South of Santa Cruz
    THE OSPREY • ISSUE NO. 75 MAY 2013 15 Recovering California Steelhead South of Santa Cruz By Kurt Zimmerman, Tim Frahm and Sam Davidson — California Trout, Trout Unlimited — Kurt Zimmerman is Southern Steelhead genetics evince unique documents, intended to help achieve California Regional Manager for characteristics region-by-region (and recovery goals by describing strate - California Trout. Tim Frahm and Sam even watershed-by-watershed), as the gies and recommended actions likely Davidson are California Central Coast fish adapted to the particular condi - required to restore viable wild popula - Steelhead Coordinator and California tions and climate factors of coastal tions. Communications Manager for Trout streams from the Baja Peninsula to In early 2012, after years of public Unlimited. Visit their web sites at: Alaska. Today, steelhead south of San and agency input, NMFS released the www.caltrout.org Mateo County in California are catego - Final Southern California Recovery www.tucalifornia.org rized by the National Marine Fisheries Plan for the SCC steelhead. Later that Service (NMFS) into two “Distinct year, the agency released for public any anglers consider Population Segments” (DPS): the comment a Review Draft of the the steelhead trout (O. “South Central California Coastal” Recovery Plan for the South Central mykiss) the “perfect Coastal steelhead. These two Recovery fish.” Steelhead are Plans identify area-wide threats as widely revered for well as threats specific to particular Mtheir power and grace in the water, and watersheds. Common threats are the Steelhead have for the high challenge of actually three “Ds”: Dams, Diversions and catching one. Sport fishing for steel - declined across much Diminished Aquatic and Riparian head is a major contributor to many Habitats.
    [Show full text]