DOCSLIB.ORG

Ray Grass Perenne Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ray grass perenne pdf Continue Published in Temperate Climate and Cold Description: Unlike the annual rye grass, this variety is characterized by lasting over two years, being able to reach up to three or four years. It has a shallow fibrous radical system. It adapts to a temperate climate, does not tolerate high temperatures. Its growth is straight, with bright green leaves. It supports trampling, frost and is well competitive with other species. Soil: Suitable for all soils (except sandy soils), although it prefers fertile and moist soils and ph is close to neutrality. Nutrients and water: Requires irrigation, especially in summer and high fertilization. Shadow: Not suitable. Landing density: 3 to 15 kg / 100 m2. It is preferable to sow in early autumn, but can also be done in summer. Please note that the depth is no more than 2 cm. Cutting: 3 to 5 cm. Frequency: increased. Use: Widely used in parks and sports grounds, in mixes. It belongs to the family of grass, which is widely used all over the world and is considered one of the most valuable species of meadows. It is one of the most commonly used species both alone and in the mix. It has excellent tolerance to use, rapid germination (7 days in spring and 10 days in winter) and excellent installation speed. On the other hand, it is a species that is not drought-tolerant and requires high maintenance. Crossing different varieties has produced a wide range of varieties that differ in their characteristics, such as: tolerance to use, winter strength, color, resistance to disease and tolerance to heat and drought. This made it very common today to find blends of different varieties of Ryegrass, such as ph.D. Planting data planting doses of 500 kg/ha planting season all year round. Preferably spring and autumn. Species of plants Lolium perennial Scientific classification Kingdom: Plantae Clade: Tracheophytes Clade: Angiosperms Clade: Monocots Clade: Commelinids Order: Poales Family: Poaceae Subfamily: Pooideae Genus: Lolium Species: L. perennial Binomial name Lolium perennialL. Perennial loliums, commonly named perennial rye algae, English rye grass, winter rye grass, or grass, are grass from the Poaceae family. It is native to Europe, Asia and North Africa, but is widely cultivated and naturalized worldwide. The description of Lolium perennial, showing lice and ribbed leaves Plant is a low-growing, tufted, bald grass, with a bunch of (or cultivating) growth habits. The leaves are dark green, smooth and glossy on the bottom surface, with non-tooth parallel sides and prominent parallel veins on the top surface. The leaves are folded in length in the bud (unlike the rolled leaves of Italian rye grass, Lolium multiflorum) with a strong central keel, giving a flattened look. The ligul is very short and and often hard to see, and the little white uricles grip the stem at the base of the leaf blade. The leaf shell at the base is usually tinged with pink and bald. The stems grow to 90 cm. The inflorescence is unspoted, with spikes on alternating lateral edges to the stem. Each thorn has only one glitch, on the side of the stem, and four to 14 inflorescences without awnings, unlike Italian rye grass. Pollen pale yellow, and flower plants from May to November. The perennial rye forest has a fibrous root system, with thick main roots and thinner lateral branches. The roots are usually arbuscular mycorrhizal. The distribution of perennial rye grass is native to southern Europe, the Middle East, North Africa and east to Central Asia. As a useful type of grass for feed and grazing, it was adopted by farmers, settling in new areas including North America, South Africa and Australia. It can be used to prevent erosion and stabilize soils, as well as create lawns for lawns and golf courses. With its great ability to set seeds, its ease of germination and energy, it has spread from fields where it has been planted on roadsides, walkways, footpaths, wastelands, river banks and sand dunes. In the countries where it was introduced, it can be considered as an invasive species that competes with native plants. Growing and using perennial rye grass is an important pasture and feed of plants, and is used in many grazing seed mixtures. In fertile soil, it produces a high harvest of grass, and in the UK and Ireland, it is often sown for short-term ley meadows, often with red or white clover (Trifolium). In the UK it is also used as an indicator of non-specific rich meadows, as it outcompetes rare plants and herbs, especially in fertile soils. Agricultural environmental schemes such as rural care schemes, environmentally sensitive areas of the Scheme, and environmental trusteeship provide funding for rich species of meadows that do not have an abundance of rye grass. Selected seed blends are widely used for sports fields, especially winter sports in temperate climates, due to their durability and ability to regenerate. It is widely used in the southwestern United States to observe winter lawns. Bermuda is a typical summer grass in states like Arizona because it is able to withstand high temperatures. However, Bermuda Isthing in the Cold Winter Months. Instead of brown lawns, many homeowners, public spaces, and golf courses watched these lawns with perennial ryegrass in early to mid-September. It is also the grass used on the courts at the All England Lawn Tennis Club at Wimbledon. Since 2001, the courts have been sown with 100% rye grass to improve strength and strengthen sward to withstand better increase wear and tear Games. Similar types of Italian rye grass, Lolium multiflorum, differ in that each scale in rosehip has a long bristles at the top. Its stem is also round, not folded. The couch, Elymus repens, has spikes mounted on the wide side of the stem rather than the edges. Gallery Single Plant Tillers Seeds Perennial Rye Nursery Links BSBI List 2007. The Botanic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Archive from the original (xls) for 2015-01-25. Received 2014-10-17. Failed check? BSBI Description Archive 2011-07-17 on Wayback Machine received 10 December 2010. Perennial lolium of rye grass. A compendium of invasive species. Kabi, Kabi. Received on December 8, 2015. Herbal courts. www.wimbledon.com. Received 2017-07-08. Readers digest nature lovers Library Field Guide to Wild Flowers UK, 1998, page 416 External links Jepson Manual Treatment for festuca perennis, which lists lolium pereenne as a synonym for the Forest Service Fire Ecology Wikimedia Photo Gallery Commons has media associated with Lolium perennials. The LinkedIn uses cookies to improve the functionality and performance of our site, as well as to provide appropriate advertising. As you continue to browse this website, you agree to use cookies. For more information, you can find out our Use and Privacy Policy. LinkedIn uses cookies to improve the functionality and performance of our site, as well as to provide appropriate advertising. As you continue to browse this website, you agree to use cookies. For more information, you can find out our Privacy Policy and terms of use. Lolium perennial Photo Raygrass perennial, Raigr's, Ray Grass perennial, English Ray- grass, English Raygrass, Vallico, Ballico, Avallico, English Ballica, Ballico, English grass, English grass, English Raigr's - - Scientific or Latin name: Lolium perennial - Common or vulgar name: Raygrass perennial, Raigr's, Ray grass perennials, English Ray-grass, English Raygrass, Vallico, Ballico, Avallico, English Ballica, Ballico, English It is characterized by its rapid germination. 5-7 days after planting the grass has already come out and everything looks green. - Raigr'is lasts three or four years, despite the requirement of frequent mowing that weaken plants, so it is advisable to mix them with other perennial species of germination and slowing development. - It is also widely used in clean planting and bermuda resiembras to hide winter (Bermuda delays). delays). They germinate quickly and are easy to install for this reason it is used as a component of most blends. - It adapts very well to the cold climate, with summer warm days and cool nights. - Allows for lower contractions than the annual Ryegrass and is more resistant to high temperatures as it persists in the summer. - Common Ryegrass does not provide high quality lawn. - The varieties represent a significant improvement in color and ease of cutting and are highly recommended for autumn hooks over Bermuda or Kikuyo. - It stands out for its rapid germination and installation and high resistance to trampling. - It grows in all types of soils, better in moist and fertile soils, but tolerates heavy soils. - The most common of all does not tolerate frequent reductions. - Extraordinary density and excellent summer and winter behavior, with a dark green color and aesthetic appearance of the best level. - Its resistance to trampling and its slow regrowth after mowing, in addition to its better tolerance to salinity make it very suitable for sporting purposes or in gardens. -It doesn't adapt very well to the drought, you need to water a little bit. - Raigre is very demanding in water and nitrogen. - Resist something salinity (more or less like Festuca arundinacea). - Resist trampling well. - Also tolerates the cold. - A small shade is tolerant. Shadow doesn't do well. - The recommended cutting height for rooting is 2 to 4 cm . - Excellent resistance to mushrooms, especially red filament, rust (rust crown) and brown decay. Infojardin Theme 4.7 of 5 stars based on 7 reviews. 5 stars 5 votes 4 stars 2 votesMy rating: ALL VIDEO KESPIOSAS: Evergreen Raygrass, Reigres, Ray Grass perennial, English Ray-grass, English Raygrass, English Raygrass, Valliko, Ballico, Aballico, English Ballica, Ballico, English Grass, English Raigr's Infojard.
Recommended publications
  • Initial Study Appendix B

    Initial Study Appendix B

    Uvas Road at Little Uvas Creek Bridge Replacement Project Biological Assessment Biological Assessment Uvas Road over Little Uvas Creek Bridge Replacement Project (37C-0095/37C-0601 [new]) Near Morgan Hill, Santa Clara County, California 04-SCL-0-CR Federal Project Number BRLO 5937(124) Caltrans District 04 November 2015 Biological Assessment Uvas Road over Little Uvas Creek Bridge Replacement Project (37C-0095/37C-0601 [new]) Near Morgan Hill, Santa Clara County, California 04-SCL-0-CR Federal Project Number BRLO 5937(124) Caltrans District 04 November 2015 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation and Santa Clara County Roads and Airports Department Prepared By: ___________________________________ Date: ____________ Patrick Boursier, Principal (408) 458-3204 H. T. Harvey & Associates Los Gatos, California Approved By: ___________________________________ Date: ____________ Solomon Tegegne, Associate Civil Engineer Santa Clara County Roads and Airports Department Highway and Bridge Design 408-573-2495 Concurred By: ___________________________________ Date: ____________ Tom Holstein Environmental Branch Chief Office of Local Assistance Caltrans, District 4 Oakland, California 510-286-5250 For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in Braille, large print, on audiocassette, or computer disk. To obtain a copy in one of these alternate formats, please call or write to the Santa Clara County Roads and Airports Department: Solomon Tegegne Santa Clara County Roads and Airports Department 101 Skyport Drive San Jose, CA 95110 408-573-2495 Summary of Findings, Conclusions and Determinations Summary of Findings, Conclusions and Determinations The Uvas Road at Little Uvas Creek Bridge Replacement Project (proposed project) is proposed by the County of Santa Clara Roads and Airports Department in cooperation with the Office of Local Assistance of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and this Biological Assessment (BA) has been prepared following Caltrans’ procedures.
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park

    Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park

    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 9-17-2018 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park" (2018). Botanical Studies. 85. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/85 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE REDWOOD NATIONAL & STATE PARKS James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State Univerity Arcata, California 14 September 2018 The Redwood National and State Parks are located in Del Norte and Humboldt counties in coastal northwestern California. The national park was F E R N S established in 1968. In 1994, a cooperative agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation added Del Norte Coast, Prairie Creek, Athyriaceae – Lady Fern Family and Jedediah Smith Redwoods state parks to form a single administrative Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosporum • northwestern lady fern unit. Together they comprise about 133,000 acres (540 km2), including 37 miles of coast line. Almost half of the remaining old growth redwood forests Blechnaceae – Deer Fern Family are protected in these four parks.
  • © 2020 Hui Chen ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

    © 2020 Hui Chen ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

    © 2020 Hui Chen ALL RIGHTS RESERVED TRAFFIC TOLERANCE OF FINE FESCUES: TECHNIQUES FOR SCREENING GERMPLASM by HUI CHEN A dissertation submitted to the School of Graduate Studies Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Plant Biology written under the direction of James A. Murphy and approved by ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey JANUARY 2020 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Traffic tolerance of fine fescues: Techniques for screening germplasm BY HUI CHEN Dissertation Director: Dr, James A. Murphy The term fine fescue refers to several Festuca spp. that have a very fine leaf texture compared to most other turfgrass species. These species are adapted to low-input management systems and have been used in mixtures with other cool-season grasses. However, fine fescues are not utilized to the same extent as other species partially due to their poor traffic tolerance and recuperative ability. Improvement in traffic tolerance of fine fescues would enable use of these grasses beyond turf systems that experience little to no traffic. The purpose of this dissertation was to develop and evaluate germplasm screening techniques that improve selecting efficiency for traffic tolerant fine fescues. The specific objectives of this research were: i) to evaluate the effect of traffic form (abrasive wear vs. cleated traffic) and season (spring vs. summer vs. autumn) on the assessment of fine fescue traffic tolerance (Chapters 1 and 2); ii) to evaluate the effect of nitrogen fertilization and harvest time on cell wall composition of fine fescues (Chapters 3 and 4); iii) to investigate the correlation between cell wall composition and wear tolerance of fine ii fescues; and iv) to develop near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) models to determine the cell wall composition of fine fescues.
  • Biology Report

    Biology Report

    MEMORANDUM Scott Batiuk To: Lynford Edwards, GGBHTD From: Plant and Wetland Biologist [email protected] Date: June 13, 2019 Verification of biological conditions associated with the Corte Madera 4-Acre Tidal Subject: Marsh Restoration Project Site, Professional Service Agreement PSA No. 2014- FT-13 On June 5, 2019, a WRA, Inc. (WRA) biologist visited the Corte Madera 4-Acre Tidal Marsh Restoration Project Site (Project Site) to verify the biological conditions documented by WRA in a Biological Resources Inventory (BRI) report dated 2015. WRA also completed a literature review to confirm that special-status plant and wildlife species evaluations completed in 2015 remain valid. Resources reviewed include the California Natural Diversity Database (California Department of Fish and Wildlife 20191), the California Native Plant Society’s Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (California Native Plant Society 20192), and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Information for Planning and Consultation database (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 20193). Biological Communities In general, site conditions are similar to those documented in 2015. The Project Site is a generally flat site situated on Bay fill soil. A maintained berm is present along the western and northern boundaries. Vegetation within the Project Site is comprised of dense, non-native species, characterized primarily by non-native grassland dominated by Harding grass (Phalaris aquatica) and pampas grass (Cortaderia spp.). Dense stands of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) are present in the northern and western portions on the Project Site. A small number of seasonal wetland depressions dominated by curly dock (Rumex crispus), fat hen (Atriplex prostrata) and brass buttons (Cotula coronopifolia) are present in the northern and western portions of the Project Site, and the locations and extent of wetlands observed are similar to what was documented in 2015.
  • INVASIVE SPECIES Grass Family (Poaceae) Wild Oats Are Annuals

    INVASIVE SPECIES Grass Family (Poaceae) Wild Oats Are Annuals

    A PROJECT OF THE SONOMA-MARIN COASTAL PRAIRIE WORKING GROUP INVASIVE SPECIES I NVASIVE A NNUAL P LANTS WILD OATS (AVENA FATUA) AND SLENDER WILD OATS (AVENA BARBATA) - NON-NATIVE Grass Family (Poaceae) Wild oats are annuals. WILD OATS: Are native to Eurasia and North Africa. WILD OAT ECOLOGY Is often dominant or co-dominant in coastal prairie (Ford and Hayes 2007; Sawyer, et al. 2009), Occurs in moist lowland prairies, drier upland prairies and open woodlands (Darris and Gonzalves 2008), Species Interactions: The success of Avena lies in its superior competitive ability: o It has a dense root system. The total root length of a single Avena plant can be from 54.3 miles long (Pavlychenko 1937) to, most likely, twice that long (Dittmer 1937). Wild oats (Avena) in Marin coastal grassland. o It produces allelopathic compounds, Photo by D. (Immel) Jeffery, 2010. chemicals that inhibit the growth of other adjacent plant species. o It has long-lived seeds that can survive for as long as 10 years in the soil (Whitson 2002). Citation: Jeffery (Immel), D., C. Luke, K. Kraft. Last modified February 2020. California’s Coastal Prairie. A project of the Sonoma Marin Coastal Grasslands Working Group, California. Website: www.cnga.org/prairie. Coastal Prairie Described > Species: Invasives: Page 1 of 18 o Pavlychenko (1937) found that, although Avena is a superior competitor when established, it is relatively slow (as compared to cultivated cereal crops wheat, rye and barley) to develop seminal roots in the early growth stages. MORE FUN FACTS ABOUT WILD OATS Avena is Latin for “oat.” The cultivated oat (Avena sativa), also naturalized in California) is thought to be derived from wild oats (Avena fatua) by early humans (Baum and Smith [2011]).
  • Nitrogen Pollution Is Linked to US Listed Species Declines

    Nitrogen Pollution Is Linked to US Listed Species Declines

    Overview Articles Nitrogen Pollution Is Linked to US Listed Species Declines DANIEL L. HERNÁNDEZ, DENA M. VALLANO, ERIKA S. ZAVALETA, ZDRAVKA TZANKOVA, JAE R. PASARI, STUART WEISS, PAUL C. SELMANTS, AND CORINNE MOROZUMI Downloaded from Nitrogen (N) pollution is increasingly recognized as a threat to biodiversity. However, our understanding of how N is affecting vulnerable species across taxa and broad spatial scales is limited. We surveyed approximately 1400 species in the continental United States listed as candidate, threatened, or endangered under the US Endangered Species Act (ESA) to assess the extent of recognized N-pollution effects on biodiversity in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. We found 78 federally listed species recognized as affected by N pollution. To illustrate the complexity of tracing N impacts on listed species, we describe an interdisciplinary case study that addressed the threat of N pollution to California Bay http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/ Area serpentine grasslands. We demonstrate that N pollution has affected threatened species via multiple pathways and argue that existing legal and policy regulations can be applied to address the biodiversity consequences of N pollution in conjunction with scientific evidence tracing N impact pathways. Keywords: biodiversity, endangered species, eutrophication, nitrogen deposition iodiversity loss is a major environmental challenge, 1979, and 1982; the CAA was passed in 1963, with subse- Bwith a growing number of recognized drivers that quent amendments passed
  • The Benefits of Livestock Grazing California's Annual Grasslands

    The Benefits of Livestock Grazing California's Annual Grasslands

    ANR Publication 8517 | September 2015 http://anrcatalog.ucanr.edu ckr i UNDERSTANDING WORKING RANGELANDS The Benefits of Livestock Grazing California’s : rrunaway/Fi Annual Grasslands Photo Looking out across the grasslands of California’s Mediterranean climate SHEILA BARRY is UC Cooperative zone, most of the plants you see are non-native annuals brought here Extension livestock and natural from Europe and Asia. These include grasses, such as wild oats (Avena resources advisor for the San Francisco Bay Area and UCCE spp.) and soft chess (Bromus hordeaceus mollis) as well as forbs such as county director for Santa Clara filarees (Erodium spp.) and black mustard (Brassica nigra). When left County; LISA BUSH is a range- unmanaged, these non-native grasses and forbs can grow profusely land management consultant in in normal and above-normal precipitation years, degrading habitat Sebastopol, California; STEPHANIE conditions for some native plants and animals and increasing the Cattle grazing in the Bay checkerspot butterfly LARSON is UCCE livestock and habitat at Coyote Ridge, south of San Jose, range management advisor and risks of wildfire and pest plant infestations. California’s Mediterranean- California. Photo: Sheila Barry UCCE county director for Sonoma type grasslands are recognized among the world’s “hot spots” of native County; and LAWRENCE D. FORD is biodiversity, despite being generally dominated by non-native species (Bartolome et al. 2014). a rangeland conservation science An appreciation of this paradox and how it came to be can help conservation biologists, environmental consultant in Felton, California. regulators, agency managers, recreationists, and ranchers communicate more clearly about how to best manage California rangelands for the purposes of conservation.
  • Investigating the Prospect of Fine Fescue Turfgrass Seed Production in Minnesota

    Investigating the Prospect of Fine Fescue Turfgrass Seed Production in Minnesota

    Investigating the Prospect of Fine Fescue Turfgrass Seed Production in Minnesota A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY David Rodriguez Herrera IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIERMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE Dr. Nancy Ehlke and Dr. Eric Watkins January 2020 © David Rodriguez Herrera Acknowledgements I want to give thanks to my advisors Dr. Nancy Ehlke, Dr. Eric Watkins, along with my committee member Dr. Carl Rosen. Their guidance was essential in this project. I also want to acknowledge Donn Vellekson, Andrew Hollman, Dave Grafstrom, Garrett Heineck, and the entire turf team for their support. None of this would have been possible with the generous financial support from the Minnesota Department of Agriculture, the University of Minnesota, and the Minnesota Turf Seed Council. Lastly, I would like to thank my parents Eberardo Rodriguez and Evodia Herrera. i Dedication I would like to dedicate this thesis to the hard-working turfgrass seed producers of northern Minnesota. ii Executive Summary The fine fescues (Festuca spp.) are a group of specialized cool-season turfgrasses that have consistently demonstrated average to exceptional quality across a range of minimally managed environments. Introducing commercial seed production of these turfgrasses in northern Minnesota is being considered because evidence suggests that consumers strongly desire and are willing to pay for the sustainable characteristics they possess. Fine fescue turfgrass seed has been historically difficult to produce successfully in Minnesota due to low yields and noxious weed infestations, but steady improvements in germplasm have encouraged agronomists to develop improved fine fescue seed production practices.
  • Appendix C Noxious and Invasive Weed Lists for Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, and Oregon

    Appendix C Noxious and Invasive Weed Lists for Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, and Oregon

    Appendix C Noxious and Invasive Weed Lists for Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, and Oregon Wyoming Noxious and Invasive Weed Species WYOMING NOXIOUS AND INVASIVE WEED SPECIES TABLE C-1 Noxious Weed Species in Wyoming Scientific Name Common Name Acroptilon repens L. Russian knapweed Ambrosia tomentosa Nutt. Skeletonleaf bursage Arctium minus (Hill) Bernh. Common burdock Cardaria draba & Cardaria pubescens (L.) Desv. Hoary cress (whitetop) Carduus acanthoides L. Plumeless thistle Carduus nutans L. Musk thistle Centaurea diffusa Lam. Diffuse knapweed Centaurea stoebe L. ssp. micranthos (Gugler) Hayek Spotted knapweed Cirsium arvense L. Canada thistle Convolvulus arvensis L. Field bindweed Cynoglossum officinale L. Houndstongue Elaeagnus angustifolia L. Russian olive Elymus repens (L.) Gould. Quackgrass Euphorbia esula L. Leafy spurge Hypericum perforatum L. Common St. Johnswort Isatis tinctoria L. Dyer's woad Lepidium latifolium L. Perennial pepperweed (giant whitetop) Leucanthemum vulgare Lam. Ox-eye daisy Linaria dalmatica (L.) Mill. Dalmatian toadflax Linaria vulgaris (P.) Mill Yellow toadflax Lythrum salicaria L. Purple loosestrife Onopordum acanthium L. Scotch thistle Sonchus arvensis L. Perennial sowthistle Tamarix spp. Saltcedar Tanacetum vulgare Common Tansy Source: Wyoming Weed and Pest Council. 2012. “Wyoming Weed & Pest Control Act Designated List.” http://www.wyoweed.org/statelist.html. Accessed on December 12, 2012. IS101112094744PDX/NOXIOUS AND INVASIVE WEEDS LISTS_V2 C-1 COPYRIGHT 2012 BY CH2M HILL ENGINEERS, INC. • COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL POST-RESTORATION MONITORING REPORT RUBY PIPELINE POST-RESTORATION MONITORING PROJECT, WYOMING, UTAH, NEVADA, AND OREGON TABLE C-2 Invasive Weed Species in Lincoln County, Wyoming Scientific Name Common Name Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn. crested wheatgrass Agrostis gigantea Roth redtop Arctium lappa L. great burdock Arctium minus Bernh.
  • Plant Identification of Younger Lagoon Reserve

    Plant Identification of Younger Lagoon Reserve

    Plant Identification of Younger Lagoon Reserve A guide written by Rebecca Evans with help from Dr. Karen Holl, Elizabeth Howard, and Timothy Brown 1 Table of Contents Introduction to Plant Identification ............................................................................................. 3 Plant Index ................................................................................................................................. 6 Botanical Terminology ............................................................................................................. 12 Habits, Stem Conditions, Root Types ................................................................................ 12 Leaf Parts .......................................................................................................................... 13 Stem Features .................................................................................................................... 14 Leaf Arrangements ............................................................................................................ 16 Leaf Shape ........................................................................................................................ 18 Leaf Margins and Venation ............................................................................................... 20 Flowers and Inflorescences ................................................................................................ 21 Grasses .............................................................................................................................
  • WRIGHT HILL RANCH OPEN SPACE PRESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN Natural and Cultural Resources JANUARY 2017

    WRIGHT HILL RANCH OPEN SPACE PRESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN Natural and Cultural Resources JANUARY 2017

    SONOMA COUNTY AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION & OPEN SPACE DISTRICT WRIGHT HILL RANCH OPEN SPACE PRESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN Natural and Cultural Resources JANUARY 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Regional Planning Context ..........................................................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose and Goals ........................................................................................................................................2 1.3 Development Process .................................................................................................................................2 1.3.1 Document Development .................................................................................................................2 1.3.2 Technical Experts and Stakeholder Group Engagement .................................................3 2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................4 2.1 Location and Regional Setting ................................................................................................................4 2.2 Adjacent Ownership and Land Uses ...................................................................................................4 2.3 Historic Land Uses of Wright Hill Ranch and Surrounding Areas .........................................4
  • Sibley Volcanic Regional Preserve Checklist of Wild Plants Sorted Alphabetically by Growth Form, Scientific Name

    Sibley Volcanic Regional Preserve Checklist of Wild Plants Sorted Alphabetically by Growth Form, Scientific Name

    Sibley Volcanic Regional Preserve Checklist of Wild Plants Sorted Alphabetically by Growth Form, Scientific Name This is a comprehensive list of the wild plants reported to be found in Sibley Volcanic Regional Preserve. The plants are sorted alphabetically by growth form, then by scientific name. This list includes the common name, family, status, invasiveness rating, origin, longevity, habitat, and bloom dates. EBRPD plant names that have changed since the 1993 Jepson Manual are listed alphabetically in an appendix. Column Heading Description Checklist column for marking off the plants you observe Scientific Name According to The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition (JM2) and eFlora (ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html) (JM93 if different) If the scientific name used in the 1993 edition of The Jepson Manual (JM93) is different, the change is noted as (JM93: xxx) Common Name According to JM2 and other references (not standardized) Family Scientific family name according to JM2, abbreviated by replacing the “aceae” ending with “-” (ie. Asteraceae = Aster-) Status Special status rating (if any), listed in 3 categories, divided by vertical bars (‘|’): Federal/California (Fed./Calif.) | California Native Plant Society (CNPS) | East Bay chapter of the CNPS (EBCNPS) Fed./Calif.: FE = Fed. Endangered, FT = Fed. Threatened, CE = Calif. Endangered, CR = Calif. Rare CNPS (online as of 2012-01-23): 1B = Rare, threatened or endangered in Calif, 3 = Review List, 4 = Watch List; 0.1 = Seriously endangered in California, 0.2 = Fairly endangered in California EBCNPS (online as of 2012-01-23): *A = Statewide listed rare; A1 = 2 East Bay regions or less; A1x = extirpated; A2 = 3-5 regions; B = 6-9 Inv California Invasive Plant Council Inventory (Cal-IPCI) Invasiveness rating: H = High, L = Limited, M = Moderate, N = Native OL Origin and Longevity.