DOCSLIB.ORG

Bicycle Expenditure Program (BEP)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Bicycle Expenditure Program (BEP) VTA administers and distributes funds from these The Bicycle Expenditure Program (BEP) is the funding sources to Member Agencies, matching appropriate proj- mechanism for planned bicycle projects in Santa Clara ect types and funding amounts with the requirements County. It is developed in conjunction with the VTP of each fund source. VTA assists Member Agencies as update. The bicycle network is an essential component necessary to comply with the various regional, state and of a fully integrated, multimodal, countywide trans- federal procedural rules of each fund source. As part of portation system, and VTA is committed to improving the VTP update, the BEP projects list will be reviewed bicycling conditions that will benefit all users 7 days per and re-adopted approximately every four years as part of week and 24 hours per day, enabling people of all ages to the VTP process. In May 2013, VTA Board of Directors bike to work, school, errands, and for recreation. adopted the BEP Project List (Table 2.7a, Figure 2.6). The BEP was first adopted by the VTA Board of The process for developing the BEP Project List involves Directors in 2000 as a financially constrained list of two main steps: 1) Developing a master list of projects, projects with a ten-year funding horizon. BEP projects and 2) Constraining the master list to the financial con- are solicited from Member Agencies and evaluated by a straints of the VTP. Per the BEP Policies, the projects committee consisting of BPAC members and VTA staff. were divided into two categories: The development of the BEP is guided by the Board- • Category 1—greater than or equal to 50 points adopted Policies and Evaluation Criteria. • Category 2—between 35 and 50 points The funding for the BEP comes from several sources, Category 1 Projects will receive priority funding consid- including: eration in BEP and VTA funding programs. Category 2 Projects are eligible to compete for BEP and other funds, • Congestion Management Air Quality (CMAQ) through the One-Bay-Area Grant (OBAG) Program but will not receive priority funding consideration. • Transportation Funds for Clean Air, funded through the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) • Transportation Development Act Article 3 funds • Local Matching Funds Bike to Work Day, May 8, 2014 54 VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY VALLEY TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2040 CHAPTER TWO INVESTING IN OUR FUTURE Table 2 .7a Bicycle Expenditure Program Projects in Santa Clara County CATEGORY 1 VTP Sponsor/ Cost Project Title and Description ID Local Agency (2013 $M) B1 Campbell Hamilton Ave . Median Bicycle and Pedestrian Enhancements: Bascom to Leigh $1 8. Replace existing median on Hamilton Ave. east of the Bascom Ave. intersection. Install bike lanes and potential anticipated Streetscape Standards, including wider sidewalks. B2 Campbell Portals Project: Bike Lanes on Campbell Ave . at SR 17 $4 2. Widen the north and south sides of Campbell Ave. to accommodate bicycles with a widened bicycle lane. Remove existing curtain walls and install new retaining and tie back walls to provide pedestrian portal openings behind the existing abutment walls on both sides of Campbell Ave. Install new widened sidewalks in portal areas. B3 Cupertino Miller Ave . Bike Lanes: Stevens Creek Blvd . to Calle de Barcelona $0 1. Complete bike lanes on Miller Ave. between Stevens Creek Blvd. and Calle de Barcelona. B4 Gilroy Lions Creek Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) Service Rd . Trail: West of $2 0. Kern Ave . between Kern and Day Construct 12-foot-wide bicycle/pedestrian trail to follow the existing SCVWD service road elevation and alignment. B5 Gilroy Lions Creek SCVWD Service Rd . Trail: West of Santa Teresa Blvd ./Day Rd . East $0 6. (between Tapestry and Day Rd . East) Install 12-foot-wide bicycle/pedestrian trail segment, to connect Christopher High School to surrounding neighborhoods, on Santa Teresa Blvd. to the bicycle/ pedestrian bridge across Lions Creek. B6 Gilroy Northern Uvas Creek SCVWD Service Rd . Trail (Gilroy Gardens Extension Trail) $2 2. Construct a 12-foot wide bicycle/pedestrian trail, to connect and expand the existing Uvas Creek trail system, on Santa Teresa Blvd. at Third St. to Burchell Creek Bridge. B7 Gilroy Western Ronan Channel SCWVD Service Rd . Trail $2 9. Convert an existing unpaved creek-side maintenance road that is closed to the public to a multi-use public trail for use by bicyclists and pedestrians. B8 Los Altos Hills El Monte Rd .: Stonebrook to Voorhees (Segment 4) $0 6. Provide new landscaping and intersection improvements to existing pathway. B9 Los Altos Hills Fremont Rd . Pathway Phase 2: Concepcion Rd . to Arastradero Rd . $0 9. Construct standard pedestrian pathway and a Class I bike path along Fremont Rd. B10 Palo Alto Bicycle Boulevard Network Project $5 8. Expand Bicycle Boulevard Network pursuant to adopted bicycle plan. B11 Palo Alto US 101/Adobe Creek Bicycle-Pedestrian Bridge $9 5. Construct a year-round, Class I overcrossing of Hwy. 101 to replace the existing, seasonal Lefkowitz Tunnel. B12 San Jose Airport Blvd .: Guadalupe River Trail Bike and Pedestrian connection $2 8. Construct a multi-use path along the north side of Airport Blvd. (at south end of Mineta San Jose International Airport) from the Guadalupe River Trail to Coleman Ave. connecting with existing Coleman Ave. bike lanes and future Santa Clara BART Station (via Brokaw Rd.). Construct a crosswalk on Airport Blvd., south of Skyport Dr. to Airport Blvd. at Coleman. VALLEY TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2040 55 Table 2 .7a continued Bicycle Expenditure Program Projects in Santa Clara County CATEGORY 1 VTP Sponsor/ Cost Project Title and Description ID Local Agency (2013 $M) B13 San Jose Auzerais Ave . Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements: Sunol St . to Race St . $2 2. Construct Class II bikeways, sidewalk improvements, crossing improvements, and bicycle parking. B14 San Jose Bird Ave . Bicycle and Pedestrian Corridor: Montgomery St . at Santa Clara to Bird $3 5. Ave . at West Virginia Construct Class II and III bikeways, enhanced crossing/detection, and sidewalk improvements. B15 San Jose Blossom Hill Rd ./Silver Creek Valley Rd . Multi-Use Path $6 1. Construct a multi-use path connecting the Monterey Rd. Pedestrian Overcrossing at Blossom Hill Rd. with the Coyote Creek Trail east of Hwy. 101. The path will run along the eastern side of Monterrey Rd. between the bicycle/pedestrian bridge south of Blossom Hill to the Northbound Blossom Hill off-ramp at Monterey; along the Northbound off-ramp; and along the north side of Blossom Hill/Silver Creek Valley Rd. over Hwy. 101 to Coyote Creek Trail. B16 San Jose Blossom Hill Rd .: Calero Bikeways from Coleman Rd . at Blossom Hill Rd . to Palmia $0 4. Dr . at Cottle Rd . Construct Class II bikeways, bicycle crossing improvements, and brief Class I segment through sidewalk widening at existing park. B17 San Jose Branham Lane Bikeway: Camden Ave . to Monterey Rd . $2 4. Construct Class II enhanced bikeways for the entire length of Branham Lane (5.1 miles). Connect to planned Class III bikeways on Branham Lane East and a planned bicycle/pedestrian bridge over Hwy. 101 connecting to the Coyote Creek Trail. B18 San Jose Brokaw-Coleman Airport Bikeway: Airport Blvd . and the Guadalupe Trail to Airport $1 2. Blvd . and Coleman Ave . Construct Class II bikeways, bicycle crossing improvements, and Class I multi-use path. B19 San Jose Capitol Ave ./Capitol Expwy . Bikeway: Penitencia Creek Rd ./Trail to Quimby Rd ./ $0 3. Thompson Creek Construct Class II bikeways and bicycle crossing improvements. B20 San Jose Charcot Bikeway: Orchard Pkwy . to O’Toole Ave ./Hwy . 880 $0 5. Construct Class II bikeways and bicycle crossing improvements. B21 San Jose Cottle Rd . Multi-Use Path: Hospital Pkwy . to Poughkeepsie Rd . $2 7. Construct Class I bikeway/multi-use path on east side of Cottle Rd. (0.8 miles); enhance crossings and signage along east side of Cottle Rd. B22 San Jose Guadalupe River Trail (I-880 to the Bay Trail) and Tasman Undercrossing $0 0. Construct a partially paved trail segment along the Guadalupe River from Gold St. to Montague Expwy. Elements of the trail include a 12-foot-paved AC trail with striping and signage, a seating area midpoint, call boxes, and a gateway structure at Montague Expwy. B23 San Jose Havana Dr ./Holly Hill Dr . Bike/Pedestrian Bridge at US 101 $8 5. Construct a 10-foot-wide, 380-foot-long bicycle and pedestrian bridge over Hwy. 101, connecting the east side with Class I, II, and III bikeways in San Jose. B24 San Jose Hedding St . Bikeway: Park Ave . to 17th St . $0 3. Enhance on-street crosstown bikeway between San Jose/Santa Clara city limit with Guadalupe River Trail, Coyote Creek Trail, and Penitencia Creek Trail. Treatment will include bike lanes, sharrows, signs, etc. 56 VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY VALLEY TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2040 CHAPTER TWO INVESTING IN OUR FUTURE Table 2 .7a continued Bicycle Expenditure Program Projects in Santa Clara County CATEGORY 1 VTP Sponsor/ Cost Project Title and Description ID Local Agency (2013 $M) B25 San Jose Hwy . 87 Trail Connection Multi-Use Path: Unified Way through Curtner Light Rail $1 9. Station Park & Ride to Carol Dr . at Hwy 87 Provide multi-use path connecting discontinuous segments of the Hwy. 87 Trail near Curtner Ave. The multi-use path will run along the east side of Unified Way, from the Hwy. 87 Trail terminus at Unified Way southward to Curtner Ave.; on the southern side of Curtner from the Northbound Hwy. 87 off-ramp; through the Curtner Light Rail parking area; along Canoas Garden to Carol Drive/Hwy. 87 Bike Path entrance. B26 San Jose Hwy . 237 Bikeway: Great America Pkwy . to Zanker (Class I and II) $0 5.
Recommended publications
  • Flood Insurance?

    Flood Insurance?

    Safe, Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection Program The passage of the Safe, Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection Program in 2012 has made the community’s long term goals for protecting the future of the Santa Clara Valley possible, including: • Supplying safe, healthy water • Retrofitting dams and critical infrastructure for earthquakes • Reducing toxins, hazards and contaminants • Restoring wildlife habitat in our waterways • Providing natural flood protection Even though we are in a drought, flooding can happen. Santa Clara County has had several damaging floods over the years, Extreme dry conditions can harden the ground. Within the first few most notably in 1995 and 1997 along the Guadalupe River and 1998 days of heavy rain, the ground can deflect water into streams and along Coyote and San Francisquito creeks. Call your city’s floodplain creeks, increasing the chances of flash flooding. It can strike quickly manager or the Santa Clara Valley Water District’s Community with little or no warning. Projects Unit at 408.630.2650 to determine if you are in a floodplain. Floodwater can flow swiftly through neighborhoods and away from The water district’s flood prevention and flood awareness outreach streams when creeks “overbank” or flood. Dangerously fast-moving efforts reduce flood insurance rates by as much as 10 percent. FEMA’s floodwaters can flow thousands of feet away from the flooded creek National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System (CRS) within minutes. evaluates the flood protection efforts that CRS communities make and provides a rating. While the chances may seem slim for a 1 percent flood* to occur, the real odds of a 1 percent flood are greater than one in four during the In our area, *participating CRS communities (noted on the magnet) earn length of a 30-year mortgage.
  • Initial Study Appendix B

    Initial Study Appendix B

    Uvas Road at Little Uvas Creek Bridge Replacement Project Biological Assessment Biological Assessment Uvas Road over Little Uvas Creek Bridge Replacement Project (37C-0095/37C-0601 [new]) Near Morgan Hill, Santa Clara County, California 04-SCL-0-CR Federal Project Number BRLO 5937(124) Caltrans District 04 November 2015 Biological Assessment Uvas Road over Little Uvas Creek Bridge Replacement Project (37C-0095/37C-0601 [new]) Near Morgan Hill, Santa Clara County, California 04-SCL-0-CR Federal Project Number BRLO 5937(124) Caltrans District 04 November 2015 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation and Santa Clara County Roads and Airports Department Prepared By: ___________________________________ Date: ____________ Patrick Boursier, Principal (408) 458-3204 H. T. Harvey & Associates Los Gatos, California Approved By: ___________________________________ Date: ____________ Solomon Tegegne, Associate Civil Engineer Santa Clara County Roads and Airports Department Highway and Bridge Design 408-573-2495 Concurred By: ___________________________________ Date: ____________ Tom Holstein Environmental Branch Chief Office of Local Assistance Caltrans, District 4 Oakland, California 510-286-5250 For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in Braille, large print, on audiocassette, or computer disk. To obtain a copy in one of these alternate formats, please call or write to the Santa Clara County Roads and Airports Department: Solomon Tegegne Santa Clara County Roads and Airports Department 101 Skyport Drive San Jose, CA 95110 408-573-2495 Summary of Findings, Conclusions and Determinations Summary of Findings, Conclusions and Determinations The Uvas Road at Little Uvas Creek Bridge Replacement Project (proposed project) is proposed by the County of Santa Clara Roads and Airports Department in cooperation with the Office of Local Assistance of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and this Biological Assessment (BA) has been prepared following Caltrans’ procedures.
  • JUNTOS Initiative

    JUNTOS Initiative

    7/9/2020 Print/Preview Powered by ZoomGrants™ Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority 2020 Urban Grant Program Deadline: 7/1/2020 Santa Clara County Public Health Department JUNTOS Initiative Jump to: Project Description Documents Upload $ 199,955.00 Requested Santa Clara County Public Health Department Submitted: 6/30/2020 11:43:58 AM Telephone408-817-6881 (Pacific) 1775 Story Road, Suite 120 Fax 408-251-4014 San Jose, CA 95122 Web www.sccphd.org Project Contact EIN 94-6000533 Michelle Wexler Senior Health Care Program [email protected] Manager Tel: 408-817-6881 Bonnie Broderick [email protected] Additional Contacts none entered Project Description top Applicant Type 1. What type of organization is this? ✔ Public Agency School or School District 501(c)3 Nonprofit Eligible organization acting as Fiscal Sponsor for another organization 2. Does the application include a fiscal sponsor? If the project includes a fiscal sponsor, the fiscal sponsor must be the applicant. YES ✔ NO Overview https://www.zoomgrants.com/printprop.asp?rfpidu=EAFEEA1775E740ADA668DE61AB8BC94A&propidu=1827D0E2B10C428BBA75DF3417C12D24 1/13 7/9/2020 Print/Preview 3. Which type of grant are you requesting? Small ($10,000 - $39,999) ✔ Large ($40,000 - $250,000) 4. Grant category (check all that apply) Environmental Stewardship and Restoration Parks, Trails, and Public Access ✔ Environmental Education ✔ Urban Agriculture / Food Systems 5. Type of project (check all that apply) Capital improvement (Large projects only) Planning ✔ Program 6. Project Location: Address / Neighborhood What is the physical location of the project? If there is no physical location, please enter "N/A." If the project will be in multiple locations, please list all.
  • Senate Bill No. 739 Passed the Senate July 22, 2001 Secretary Of

    Senate Bill No. 739 Passed the Senate July 22, 2001 Secretary Of

    Senate Bill No. 739 Passed the Senate July 22, 2001 Secretary of the Senate Passed the Assembly July 16, 2001 Chief Clerk of the Assembly This bill was received by the Governor this day of , 2001, at o’clock M. Private Secretary of the Governor SB 739 — 2 — CHAPTER An act making appropriations for the support of the government of the State of California and for several public purposes in accordance with the provisions of Section 12 of Article IV of the Constitution of the State of California, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST SB 739, Peace. 2001–02 Budget. This bill would make appropriations for support of state government for the 2001–02 fiscal year. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an ur- gency statute. Appropriation: yes. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1.00. This act shall be known and may be cited as the ‘‘Budget Act of 2001.’’ SEC. 1.50. (a) In accordance with Section 13338 of the Govern- ment Code, as added by Chapter 1284, Statutes of 1978, and as amended by Chapter 1286, Statutes of 1984, it is the intent of the Leg- islature that this act utilize a coding scheme compatible with the Gov- ernor’s Budget and the records of the State Controller, and provide for the appropriation of federal funds received by the state and deposited in the State Treasury. (b) Essentially, the format and style are as follows: (1) Appropriation item numbers have a code which is common to all the state’s fiscal systems.
  • Gilroy, California

    Gilroy, California

    GILROY, CALIFORNIA PROPERTY OVERVIEW GILROY PREMIUM OUTLETS® GILROY, CA MAJOR METROPOLITAN AREAS SELECT TENANTS Monterey: 35 miles south Saks Fifth Avenue OFF 5TH, Ann Taylor Factory Store, Banana Republic San Jose: 40 miles north Factory Store, Brooks Brothers Factory Store, Calvin Klein Company San Francisco: 80 miles north Store, Coach Factory Store, DKNY Company Store, Forever 21, Gap Outlet, GUESS Factory Store, HUGO BOSS, J.Crew Factory, kate spade new york, LACOSTE Outlet, LOFT Outlet, lululemon, Michael Kors Outlet, Movado RETAIL Company Store, Nautica Factory Store, New Balance, Nike Factory Store, The North Face, Polo Ralph Lauren Factory Store, Timberland Outlet, Tommy GLA (sq. ft.) 578,000; 145 stores Hilger Company Store, True Religion, Under Armour OPENING DATES TOURISM / TRAFFIC Opened 1990 Gilroy Premium Outlets is a popular shopping destination for area Expanded 1991, 1992, 1994, 1995 GILROY residents and visitors. The center is one of the largest and most PREMIUM OUTLETS productive outlet shopping destination south of the San Francisco Bay Area GILROY, CA through the central coast of California. Gilroy is home to wineries, antique PARKING RATIO shops, Gilroy Gardens Family Theme Park and the world-famous 5:1 Garlic Festival. To the north are the world-famous attractions of the San Francisco Bay Area and the high-tech energy of Silicon Valley, one of the most auent and highly educated demographics in the country. RADIUS POPULATION To the west are the unique seaside attractions of Santa Cruz with its historic boardwalk. To the south, the beauty and history of Monterey and 15 miles: 231,849 Carmel are on display.
  • Santee Neighborhood Community Assessment Analysis

    Santee Neighborhood Community Assessment Analysis

    STUDIO 201 SANTEE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT ANALYSIS DECEMBER 2010 2 SANTEE NEIGHBORHOOD | COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.9 BUILDING TYPES, WALLS, AND OWNERSHIP 37 2.10 NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS 39 LIST OF Figures 4 2.11 PUBLIC/PRIVATE SPACE HIERARCHY 41 1. INTRODUCTION 7 2.12 SANTEE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK 43 1.1. NEIGHBORHOOD SETTING 7 2.13 TRAVEL PATTERNS 47 1.2. THE STRONG NEIGHBORHOODS INITIATIVE 10 2.14 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY 49 1.3. FRANKLIN MCKINLEY CHILDREN’S INITIATIVE 11 CHAPTER 2 ENDNOTES 51 1.4. SAN JOSÉ STATE UNIVERSITY (STUDIO 201) 11 3. NEIGHBORHOOD FOCUS AREAS 55 1.5. GUIDING PRINCIPLES 11 3.1. SCHOOLS AS COMMUNITY Centers 55 1.6. EXISTING POLICY DOCUMENTS 12 3.2. HEALTH, ACCESS, AND SAFety 64 CHAPTER 1 endnotes 13 3.3. COMMUNITY DESIGN 74 2. NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE 15 3.4. Story Road RevitaliZation 81 2.1 MEET THE NEIGHBORHOOD: ETHNIC, LINGUISTIC, AND HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS 16 CHAPTER 3 ENDNOTES 89 2.2 SANTEE NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOLS 16 4. NEXT STEPS OVERVIEW 93 2.3 ECONOMIC SNAPSHOT 18 SCHOOLS AS COMMUNITY CENTERS 94 2.4 SOCIAL FACTORS 21 HEALTH, SAFETY, & ACCESS 96 2.5 OPEN SPACES ANALYSIS AND OPPORTUNITIES 25 COMMUNITY DESIGN AND HOUSING 101 2.6 NATURAL FACTORS 27 STORY road revitaliZation 103 2.7 FOOD SYSTEMS 30 PRELIMINARY PUBLIC OUTREACH 105 2.8 EXISTING OBSERVED LAND- USES 35 APPENDIX 106 SANTEE NEIGHBORHOOD | COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT ANALYSIS 3 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2-16: 5th Grade Aerobic Fitness Figure 2-33: Example 2 of four-plex buildings, Standards, 26 38 Chapter 1 Figure 2-17: 7th Grade
  • Lake Cunningham Park Regional Park 8 4 183.25 Alum Rock Park 15350 Penitencia Creek Rd

    Lake Cunningham Park Regional Park 8 4 183.25 Alum Rock Park 15350 Penitencia Creek Rd

    Developed Council Park Area (in Name Address Park Type District District acres) Lake Cunningham Park Regional Park 8 4 183.25 Alum Rock Park 15350 Penitencia Creek Rd. Regional Park 4 6 77.5 Kelley Park Regional Park 7 7 47.44 Kelley Park - Happy Hollow Park and Zoo Regional Park 7 7 41.57 Penitencia Creek Park Neighborhood Park 4 8 36.65 Emma Prusch Farm Park Regional Park 5 6 36.41 Cataldi Park Neighborhood Park 4 8 33.97 Overfelt Gardens Regional Park 5 6 32.04 Almaden Lake Park 6099 Winfield Blvd Regional Park 10 1 30.4 Guadalupe Gardens Regional Park 3 5 27.23 Watson Park Neighborhood Park 3 5 22.32 Municipal Baseball Stadium Sports Facility 7 7 19.22 Edenvale Garden Park Regional Park 2 2 18.76 Jeffery Fontana Park Neighborhood Park 10 1 18.05 T.J. Martin Park Neighborhood Park 10 1 15.75 Calabazas Park Neighborhood Park 1 3 15.12 Arcadia Ballpark Regional Park 8 4 15.08 P.A.L. Stadium Park Sports Facility 5 6 14.28 Hillview Park Neighborhood Park 5 6 14.04 Willow Street Frank Bramhall Park Neighborhood Park 6 3 13.63 Roosevelt Park Neighborhood Park 3 5 13.62 Flickinger Park Neighborhood Park 4 8 13.53 La Colina Park Neighborhood Park 2 1 12.58 Houge Park Neighborhood Park 9 3 12.22 Evergreen Park Neighborhood Park 8 4 12.1 Capitol Park Neighborhood Park 5 6 11.91 Los Paseos Park Neighborhood Park 2 1 11.8 Fowler Creek Park Neighborhood Park 8 4 11.68 Great Oaks Park Neighborhood Park 2 2 11.54 Groesbeck Hill Park Neighborhood Park 8 4 11.46 John Mise Park Neighborhood Park 1 3 11.45 Backesto Park 13th Street and Empire Street
  • Online Feedback Form Results

    Online Feedback Form Results

    San José Diridon Station Area Online Feedback Form Summary Total Responses: 693 Raimi + Associates October 2, 2018 Table of Contents Housing/Displacement ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Q1 General Principles .................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Q2 Development of the Diridon Station Area: .............................................................................................................................. 4 Q3 Citywide Impacts and Benefits New resources generated by Google and other companies/developers go to: ....................... 5 Jobs/Education .................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Q5 General Principles .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Q6 Development of the Diridon Station Area: .............................................................................................................................. 7 Q7 Citywide Impacts and Benefits ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Land
  • AQ Conformity Amended PBA 2040 Supplemental Report Mar.2018

    AQ Conformity Amended PBA 2040 Supplemental Report Mar.2018

    TRANSPORTATION-AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Metropolitan Transportation Commission Association of Bay Area Governments MARCH 2018 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Jake Mackenzie, Chair Dorene M. Giacopini Julie Pierce Sonoma County and Cities U.S. Department of Transportation Association of Bay Area Governments Scott Haggerty, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover Alameda County Contra Costa County Bijan Sartipi California State Alicia C. Aguirre Anne W. Halsted Transportation Agency Cities of San Mateo County San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Libby Schaaf Tom Azumbrado Oakland Mayor’s Appointee U.S. Department of Housing Nick Josefowitz and Urban Development San Francisco Mayor’s Appointee Warren Slocum San Mateo County Jeannie Bruins Jane Kim Cities of Santa Clara County City and County of San Francisco James P. Spering Solano County and Cities Damon Connolly Sam Liccardo Marin County and Cities San Jose Mayor’s Appointee Amy R. Worth Cities of Contra Costa County Dave Cortese Alfredo Pedroza Santa Clara County Napa County and Cities Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cities of Alameda County Association of Bay Area Governments Supervisor David Rabbit Supervisor David Cortese Councilmember Pradeep Gupta ABAG President Santa Clara City of South San Francisco / County of Sonoma San Mateo Supervisor Erin Hannigan Mayor Greg Scharff Solano Mayor Liz Gibbons ABAG Vice President City of Campbell / Santa Clara City of Palo Alto Representatives From Mayor Len Augustine Cities in Each County City of Vacaville
  • Panoche Valley

    Panoche Valley

    THE Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society Established 1926 AVOCET The Newsletter of the Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society September-October 2017 Panoche Valley: Saving an Important Bird Area (IBA) by Shani Kleinhaus, Environmental Advocate oncluding almost eight years of advocacy and litiga- tion, SCVAS, Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter, and Defenders of Wildlife have signed a settlement agree- Cment that allows a photovoltaic solar farm to be built on about 1,000 acres of Panoche Valley floor, while at the same time preserving 26,000 acres, including 4,000 acres of valley floor grasslands, as habitat for endangered species. Califor- nia Department of Fish and Wildlife and Con Edison have also signed the agreement. We are proud of this achievement! Monterey Audubon Society first alerted SCVAS to the plans to construct a solar farm in Panoche Valley. In 2009, plans for solar arrays and supportive infrastructure encompassed most of the valley floor, as well as Little Panoche Valley. No mitigation was offered for the inevitable loss of habitat for the many endangered species that call the valley home, so we started mobilizing. In early 2010 we organized a work- shop that formed an alliance of farmers and environmental organizations in opposition to the project. This alliance has never faltered. In the years that followed, our advocacy and permit require- ments by state and federal wildlife agencies resulted in changing project ownership as investors came and went. The project footprint shrunk and mitigation lands were added. San Benito County produced additional environmental re- view documents, asserting repeatedly that the construction of a solar project on thousands of acres of valley floor could Ferruginous Hawk by Debra Shearwater cont’d on page 4 Wednesday, September 20, 2017 Cuba - The Isle of Endemics: Birds and Bats! with Dave Johnston Wednesday, October 18, 2017 Understanding California's Whales with Ted Cheeseman The Avocet 1 Please carpool if possible; bring binoculars, field guides, layered September-October Field Trips clothing.
  • The Economic Benefits of San Jose Parks

    The Economic Benefits of San Jose Parks

    Guadalupe River Trail City of San José The Economic Benefits of the Park & Recreation System in San José, California February 17, 2016 The Trust for Public Land: How we do it PLAN Identify the most important land for conservation FUND Help enact measures for public funding PROTECT Acquire and protect land CREATE Create innovative parks EDUCATE Produce analyses, research, tools, and reports Local Economic Benefits • Benefits accrue to ‒ Local government(s) ‒ Residents ‒ Local businesses Enhanced Property Value P ?E"(F&$O"1(>&;%"7(23( <$2<"$10"7(;2G&1":(5"&$(&( <&$O(2$(1$&0;(&$"(3$"N%"51;'( E0KE"$(1E&5(1E27"(23( G2F<&$&#;"(<$2<"$10"7( ;2G&1":(";7"UE"$"V( P B5(05G$"&7"(05(<$2<"$1'( >&;%"7(K"5"$&;;'($"7%;17(05( 05G$"&7":(<$2<"$1'(1&W( $">"5%"7V Enhanced Property Value P @$"7"$>05K(2<"5(7<&G"( K"5"$&;;'(05G$"&7"7( 5"0KE#2$05K( E2F"(>&;%"7+( #%1(1E"(>&;%"7(>&$'V(( P ?E"(F&K501%:"(23(1E"( 0F<&G1(E&7(#""5(7E2U5(12( #"(%<(12(,-X(32$(<&$O7(&5:( )YX(32$(1$&0;7V P Z"(%7"([X P DF<&G1(E&7(#""5(F"&7%$":( %<(12(,+---(3""1(3$2F(&( <&$O(2$(1$&0; P Z"(%7"([--(3""1 Enhanced Property Value P B::01025&;(&77"77":( >&;%"(:%"(12(<&$O7\(((((((( !"#$%&&%'( P B::01025&;(<$2<"$1'(1&W( $">"5%"(:%"(12(<&$O7\( !")*"#+%&&%'(#,((-,&&. Reducing Stormwater P @&$O7(&5:(1$&0;7(G&5( $":%G"(1E"(G2717(23( 712$FU&1"$(F&5&K"F"51( #'(G&<1%$05K(<$"G0<01&1025( FLICKR/DONJD2 &5:]2$(7;2U05K(017($%5233V R H50>"$701'(23(/&;032$50&+( I&>07(F2:";(G&;G%;&1"7( 1E"(>2;%F"(23(U&1"$( $"1&05":(#'(<&$O7(&5:( 1$&0;7V R M710F&1"(1E"(G271(23( 1$"&105K(1E&1(>2;%F"(23( U&1"$V Reducing Stormwater P
  • 1982 Flood Report

    1982 Flood Report

    GB 1399.4 S383 R4 1982 I ; CLARA VAltEY WATER DISlRIDl LIBRARY 5750 ALMADEN EXPRESSYIAY SAN JOSE. CAUFORN!A 9Sll8 REPORT ON FLOODING AND FLOOD RELATED DAMAGES IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY January 1 to April 30, 1982 Prepared by John H. Sutcliffe Acting Division Engineer Operations Division With Contributions From Michael McNeely Division Engineer Design Division and Jeanette Scanlon Assistant Civil Engineer Design Division Under the Direction of Leo F. Cournoyer Assistant Operations and Maintenance Manager and Daniel F. Kriege Operations and Maintenance Manager August 24, 1982 DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS Arthur T. Pfeiffer, Chairman District 1 James J. Lenihan District 5 Patrick T. Ferraro District 2 Sio Sanchez. Vice Chairman At Large Robert W. Gross District 3 Audrey H. Fisher At large Maurice E. Dullea District 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCrfION .......................... a ••••••••••••••••••• 4 •• Ill • 1 STORM OF JANUARY 3-5, 1982 .•.•.•.•.•••••••.••••••••.••.••.••.••••. 3 STORMS OF MARCH 31 THROUGH APRIL 13, 1982 ••.....••••••.•••••••••••• 7 SUMMARY e • • • • • • • • • : • 111 • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1111 o e • e • • o • e • e o e • e 1111 • • • • • e • e 12 TABLES I Storm Rainfall Summary •••••••••.••••.•••••••.••••••••••••• 14 II Historical Rainfall Data •••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••• 15 III Channel Flood Flow Summary •••••.•••••.•••••••••••••••••••• 16 IV Historical Stream flow Data •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 17 V January 3-5, 1982 Damage Assessment Summary •••••••••••••••••• 18 VI March 31 - April 13, 1982 Damage