Court File No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Court File No. 32735

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
(ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE
NORTHWEST TERRITORIES)

BETWEEN:

SHEILA FULLOWKA, DOREEN SHAUNA HOURIE, TRACEY NEILL, JUDIT PANDEV, ELLA MAY CAROL RIGGS, DOREEN VODNOSKI, CARLENE DAWN ROWSELL, KAREN RUSSELL and BONNIE LOU SAWLER
Appellants
(Applicants)

– and –

PINKERTON’S OF CANADA LIMITED, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES AS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES, NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, TRANSPORTATION AND GENERAL WORKERS UNION OF CANADA, BETTGER, TIMOTHY ALEXANDER ROYAL OAK VENTURES INC. (formerly ROYAL OAK MINES INC.
Respondents

AND BETWEEN:

JAMES O’NEIL
Appellant
(Applicant)

- and -
PINKERTON’S OF CANADA LIMITED, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES AS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES, NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, TRANSPORTATION AND GENERAL WORKERS UNION OF CANADA, BETTGER, TIMOTHY ALEXANDER ROYAL OAK VENTURES INC. (formerly ROYAL OAK MINES INC.
Respondents

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO
Intervenors

JOINT RESPONSE FACTUM OF THE APPELLANTS

(Sheila Fullowka, Doreen Shauna Hourie, Tracey Neill, Judit Pandev, Ella May Carol Riggs,
Doreen Vodnoski, Carlene Dawn Rowsell, Karen Russell, Bonnie Lou Sawler and James O’Neil)

(Pursuant to Rules 29(4) and 35(4) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada)

BISHOP & MCKENZIE LLP

Barristers and Solicitors

OSLER, HOSKIN & HARCOURT LLP

Barristers and Solicitors

  • 2500-10104-103 Ave.
  • 1900 - 340 Albert Street

  • Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 1V3
  • Ottawa, ON K1R 7Y6

  • J. Philip Warner, Q.C.
  • Patricia J. Wilson

  • Tel: 780-421-2464
  • Tel: 613-787-1009

  • Fax: 780-426-1305
  • Fax: 613-235-2867

E-mail: [email protected] Counsel for the Applicants, Sheila Fullowka et al
E-mail: [email protected] Ottawa Agent for Sheila Fullowka et al

TO: REGISTRAR OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT

AND TO: James E. Redmond, Q.C.
1000, 10180 – 101 Street
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP 1900 – 340 Albert Street

  • Ottawa ON K1Y 7Y6
  • Edmonton AB T5J 3S4

Patricia J. Wilson
Telephone: (780) 409-8289 Facsimile: (780) 423-2368 E-mail: [email protected]
Telephone: (613) 235-7234 Facsimile: (613) 235-2867 E-mail: [email protected]

Solicitor for the Appellant James O’Neil
Agent to Solicitor for the Appellant James O’Neil

AND TO: John M. Hope, Q.C.
Duncan & Craig LLP 2800 Scotia Place
Jeffrey W. Beedell Lang Michener LLP 300 - 50 O'Connor Street

  • Ottawa, ON K1P 6L2
  • 10060 Jasper Avenue

Edmonton, AB T5J 3V9

  • Tel.: (780) 428-6036
  • Tel.: (613) 232-7171

  • Fax: (780) 428-9683
  • Fax: (613) 231-3191

Solicitors for the Respondent Pinkerton’s of Canada Limited
Agent for Solicitors for the Respondent Pinkerton’s of Canada Limited

  • Peter D. Gibson
  • Jeffrey W. Beedell

  • Field LLP
  • Lang Michener LLP

300 - 50 O'Connor Street Ottawa, ON K1P 6L2
2000 Oxford Tower 10235 - 101 St. N.W. Edmonton, AB T5J 3G1

  • Tel.: (780) 423-7631
  • Tel.: (613) 232-7171

  • Fax: (780) 424-7116
  • Fax: (613) 231-3191

Solicitors for the Respondent Government of the Northwest Territories
Agent for Solicitors for the Respondent Government of the Northwest Territories
- 3 -

  • Patrick G. Nugent
  • Coleen Bauman

Chivers Carpenter 101 - 10426, 81 Ave N.W. Edmonton, AB T6E 1X5
Sack Goldblatt Mitchell LLP 500 – 30 Metcalfe Street Ottawa, ON K1P 5L4

Tel.: (780) 439-3611 Ext: 238 Fax: (780) 439-8543
Tel.: (613) 235-5327 Fax: (613) 235-3041

  • Solicitors for the Respondents
  • Agent for Solicitors for the

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada
Respondents National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada

  • S. Leonard Polsky
  • Jeffrey W. Beedell

MacPherson Leslie & Tyerman 2507, 10088 – 102 Avenue N.W. Calgary, AB T5J 2Z1.
Lang Michener LLP 300 - 50 O'Connor Street Ottawa, ON K1P 6L2

Tel.: (403) 693-4300 Fax: (403) 508-4349 E-mail: [email protected]
Tel.: (613) 232-7171 Fax: (613) 231-3191 E-mail: [email protected]

Solicitors for the Respondent Timothy Alexander Bettger
Agent for Solicitors for the Respondent Timothy Alexander Bettger

Robert G. McBean, Q.C. Parlee McLaws LLP 1500 Manulife Place 10180 – 101 St. N.W. Edmonton, AB T5J 4K1
Stephen J. Grace Maclaren Corlett 1625 - 50 O'Connor Street Ottawa, ON K1P 6L2

  • Tel.: (780) 423-8580
  • Tel.: (613) 233-1146

  • Fax: (780) 423-2870
  • Fax: (613) 233-7190

Solicitors for the Respondent Royal Oak Ventures Inc.
Agent for Solicitors for the Respondent Royal Oak Ventures Inc.

  • John S. Tyhurst
  • Christopher Rupar

Attorney General of Canada 234 Wellington Street, Room 1251 Ottawa ON K1A 0H8
Deputy Attorney General of Canada Department of Justice 1212 – 234 Wellington Street Ottawa ON K1A 0H8
Tel: 613-957-4860 Fax: 613-954-1920
Tel: 613-941-2351 Fax: 613-954-1920

E-mail: [email protected]

Agent for Attorney General of Canada
- 4 -
Lise Favreau (LSUC no. 25251P) Attorney General for Ontario Crown Law Office – Civil Law 20 Bay Street, 8th Floor Toronto ON M5G 2K1 Tel: 416-325-7078
Robert E. Houston Burke Robertson Barristers and Solicitors 70 Gloucester Street Ottawa ON K2P 0A2 Tel: 613-236-9665

  • Fax: 613-235-4430
  • Fax: 416-326-4181

E-mail: [email protected]

  • Counsel for Attorney General
  • Agent for Attorney General for Ontario

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  • PART I.
  • OVERVIEW AND STATEMENT OF FACTS………….…...
  • 1

1
Overview: The Respondents raise grounds of foreseeability and damages…………………………………………………….

Statement of Facts:

  • The deaths were foreseeable……………………………
  • 1

PART II. STATEMENT OF ISSUES………………………………….….. 13
Issue 1: The deaths were reasonably foreseeable……………... 13
(a) Justice Lutz is entitled to deference…………….. 13 (b) All the Respondents foresaw the deaths...……… 13
Issue 2: Personal Consumption Rates (Damages)….………… 13
(a) The Respondents’ arguments are not properly before this Court…………………………………. 13

(b) Justice Lutz did not err in his choice of
Personal Consumption Rate……………………… 13

  • PART III. STATEMENT OF ARGUMENT………………………………
  • 14

Issue 1: The deaths were reasonably foreseeable…………….
(a) Justice Lutz is entitled to deference ………....... (b) All the Respondents foresaw the deaths ……....
14 14 15

  • Issue 2: Personal Consumption Rates (Damages)……………
  • 16

16
(a) The Respondents’ arguments are not properly before this Court………………………………...

(b) Justice Lutz did not err in his choice of Personal Consumption Rates………………….....16

PART VI. LIST OF AUTHORITIES…………………………………………..21

PART VII. STATUTORY PROVISIONS............................................................22

Part I: Overview and Statement of Facts

Overview: The Respondents raise grounds of foreseeability and damages

  • 1.
  • The Respondents seek to uphold the Court of Appeal’s judgment on a ground not relied

on by the Court of Appeal, namely, on the ground that Justice Lutz made a “palpable and overriding error” when he found that the deaths of the nine miners were foreseeable.1 Certain Respondents also purport to attack Justice Lutz’s findings on “PCR’s”, though the Court of Appeal did not find that Justice Lutz committed any error in that regard.2

2.

The deaths were foreseeable

3. Even before the strike started, the GNWT recognized that if Royal Oak continued
Pursuant to Rules 29(4) and 35(4),3 the Appellants therefore file this Factum in response. operating during the strike, inadequate security would expose the replacement workers to risk. In a memo dated May 15, 1992,4 the GNWT wrote:

The Giant Mine site is not secure…. Accordingly, there is considerable concern within the Department of Safety and Public Services about the safety of any “replacement workers”, as well as concern about the safety of management personnel, Mine Safety Inspectors, and any other persons required to go underground.

  • 4.
  • On May 27, after the strike began, the Director of the Safety Division, the Acting

Director of Mine Safety and the Fire Marshal (MacRae, Gould and Bell) advised GNWT’s Deputy Minister of Safety and Public Services (Quirke) to shut the Giant Mine because:5

1 Justice Lutz found foreseeability in RFJ para. 658-664, 745, 902 (Appellants’ Joint Record, Vol. I, pp 9-11, 37, 87); the Court of Appeal sustained Justice Lutz’s finding at para. 55 (Appellants’ Joint Record, Vol. III, p 107); the Respondents argue that Justice Lutz’s finding was erroneous in Bettger’s Factum, paragraph 61, Pinkerton’s Factum, paragraph 64, CAW’s Factum, paragraph 37 ff.; GNWT’s factum, paragraph 15 2 The damages issues are raised in GNWT factum paragraph 86 ff., Bettger’s factum paragraph 134, Pinkerton’s factum paragraph 117; the Court of Appeal declined to rule on damages in CAMJ para. 207 (Appellants’ Joint Record, Vol. III, p 185). 3 Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada 4 Exhibit 761 (Appellants’ Joint Supplementary Record, Tab S26, p. 7) 5 Exhibit 762 (Appellants’ Joint Record, Vol. XII, Tab 153, pp 76-78)

Page 2

1. There has been vandalism and acts of arson well within the confines of the mine site. This has placed the on site workers at extreme risk.

2. Given the inability of Royal Oak Mines to maintain the security of the site, the next act of vandalism or arson could result in fatalities to on site persons.

  • 5.
  • On the following day, Gould wrote Dennis Patterson (the GNWT’s Minister of Safety

and Public Services)6 describing a number of the strikers’ recent attacks and saying that he would issue a closure order, because “the occupational health and safety of employees is endangered”.7

  • 6.
  • On the same day, the CASAW’s national office published a bulletin stating:8

Although the strike is only five days old as I write, the situation has begun to develop into confrontation….

  • a
  • vicious and dangerous

Fires have been breaking out inside the plant regularly. Confrontations with scab security forces are a frequent occurrence. The use of explosives and the mining of roadways has also become a factor. Two company vehicles have been destroyed.

As you can see, this is not a normal five day old strike but might be better described as an undeclared war.

  • 7.
  • Warren testified that the strike was a “war zone” where the opposing sides were

“completely, adamantly opposed to each other, unbelievable.”9 Bettger testified in discoveries

6 Exhibit 763 (Appellants’ Joint Record, Vol. XII, Tab 154, pp 79-81) 7 Exhibit 1160 (Appellants’ Joint Supplementary Record, Vol. III, Tab S36, p. 98) 8 Exhibit 746 (Appellants’ Joint Record, Vol. XII, Tab 147, p. 48) 9 Warren video evidence (Appellants’ Joint Supplementary Record, Vol. III, Tab S23, p. 1)

Response Factum Apr 23 2009.doc / 23-Apr-09

Page 3

that the strike was an “unreal environment”10 and “the rules you normally lived by didn’t seem to apply in the situation”.11 RCMP Officer Nancy Defer testified: 12

It appeared that any action could be justified because of the strike…. It was mayhem. I've never experienced any kind of a situation like that before. I don't want to ever experience it again either.

  • 8.
  • On July 6, 1992 the union local president (Schram) wrote a letter to the CAW’s president,

Hargrove, stating:13

Our local is engaged in a fierce battle against the scabbing and police-state tactics of our employer, Royal Oak Mines.

We have now been on strike for six weeks, which may not sound long, except for the ferocity of the situation.

…The company has installed forty-plus of the infamous Pinkerton’s with attack dogs inside the minesite, after our members drove a Sudbury-based security firm from the property….

…Many casualties have been inflicted on the Pinkertons. Criminal and civil charges have been laid against dozens of our members, and thirty-eight of our 240 people have been fired…. Confrontation on the lines, in the streets, and in the courts is now

the order of the day. We have the very real apprehension that someone is going to die here before it all ends….

Thanks once again for your offer of assistance. With the support of dedicated people like yourselves, we will re-bury the spectre of scab labour in whatever horrible place from which it has arisen.

10 Bettger Read-in Evidence (Appellants’ Joint Supplementary Record, Vol. I, p. 13, Tab S5,) 11 Bettger Read-in Evidence (Appellants’ Joint Supplementary Record, Vol. I, p. 12, Tab S4) 12 Defer Evidence (Appellants’ Joint Record, Vol. VIII, Tab 99-110, p. 97) 13 Exhibit 963 (Appellants’ Joint Supplementary Record, Vol. III, Tab S30, p. 28)

Response Factum Apr 23 2009.doc / 23-Apr-09

Page 4

  • 9.
  • Hargrove sent a CAW employee (Harold David) to Yellowknife to “ram the God damned

hell out of the scabs”.14 After one day in Yellowknife, David, a professional strike organizer,15 said, “I haven’t seen anything like this in my 30 years plus union experience.”16

  • 10.
  • Pinkerton’s took the place of the Cambrian security firm, which the strikers had driven

from the mine site. Pinkerton’s was, of course, well-aware of the strikers’ violence – it was the very reason that Pinkerton’s was called to Yellowknife. Pinkerton’s knew that security was "absolutely necessary for effective coping with labour strikes such as vandalism, sabotage, mischief, bombs, terrorism, kidnappings, assault, intimidation, espionage and similar threats."17 Though Pinkerton’s had no formal written contract with Royal Oak (there were only letters and invoices18), Pinkerton’s understood that its mandate was to protect “people and assets and to make sure that there’s a plant to go back to work….”19

  • 11.
  • This Court can get an insight into the strike’s “unreal environment” by considering

Doreen Hourie’s testimony about her experiences on June 14.20 On that afternoon, Mrs. Hourie was taken across the picket lines to see her husband, Norm, a miner who had been living at the mine site for the previous three weeks. That evening, scores of strikers equipped with baseball bats, bear spray, helmets and shin pads invaded the mine site in an organized attack later called “The Riot”.21 Mrs. Hourie’s testimony leaves no doubt that the injuries she received that evening were intentionally inflicted. (Mrs. Hourie’s husband, Norm, was later to be killed in the fatal

14 RFJ para. 888 (Appellants’ Joint Record, Vol. II, pp. 82-83); Appellants’ Joint Record, Vol. IX, Smith evidence p. 193:37-41 (TAB 99-157), David evidence pp. 194:43-45 & 195:45-196:1 (TAB 99-158 & 99-159); Vol. VIII, Mitic read-in pp. 56:46-57:3 (TAB 99-88); Exhibit 1205 (Appellants’ Joint Record, Vol. XV, pp. 3-137 at 58-59) TAB 179 15 David evidence (Appellants’ Joint Supplementary Record, Vol. I, Tab S16, p. 47) 16 David evidence (Appellants’ Joint Supplementary Record, Vol. I, Tab S18, p. 52) 17 Exhibit 986 (Appellants’ Joint Supplementary Record, Vol. III, Tab S31, p. 30) 18 Exhibits 822 (Respondents’ Joint Record, Volume 4, Tab 7), Exhibits 824, 1104 & 1106 (Appellants’ Joint Supplementary Record, Tab S28, p.24; Tab S34, p. 89; Tab S35, p. 95) 19 St. Amour evidence (Respondents’ Joint Record, Vol. II, Tab S5, p. 62), Witte evidence), Fullowka Plaintiffs’ Opening Statement, Dales evidence, O’Sullivan evidence (Appellants’ Joint Supplementary Record, Vol. I, Tab S15, p.45-46; Tab S3, p.10-11; Tab S9, p. 27; Tab S6, p. 14), Exhibit 823 (Appellants’ Joint Supplementary Record, Vol. III, Tab S27, p. 10); Pinkerton’s refers to “limitations” in its contract, but its mandate was broad. It also suggests that Royal Oak was stingy, but from June to December, 1992, Pinkerton’s billed $2,807,471.32 and was paid $2,554,449.79 to pursue its mandate. 20 Doreen Hourie evidence (Appellants’ Joint Supplementary Record, Tab S7, pp. 15-25) 21 RFJ para. 101 (Appellants’ Joint Record, Vol. I, p. 37)

Response Factum Apr 23 2009.doc / 23-Apr-09

Page 5

blast.) The GNWT’s Minister of Safety & Public Services (Paterson) acknowledged that if the RCMP had not attended during The Riot, there could have been loss of life.22

  • 12.
  • Pete Smith, a CAW national representative, went to the picket line and watched The

Riot.23 The next day, he issued the following press release24:

Recommended publications
  • In the Supreme Court of Canada Sheila Fullowka, Doreen Shauna Hourie, Tracey Neill, Judit Pandev, Ella May Carol Riggs, Doreen V

    In the Supreme Court of Canada Sheila Fullowka, Doreen Shauna Hourie, Tracey Neill, Judit Pandev, Ella May Carol Riggs, Doreen V

    Court File No. 32735 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES) BETWEEN: SHEILA FULLOWKA, DOREEN SHAUNA HOURIE, TRACEY NEILL, JUDIT PANDEV, ELLA MAY CAROL RIGGS, DOREEN VODNOSKI, CARLENE DAWN ROWSELL, KAREN RUSSELL, BONNIE LOU SA WLER Appellants (Applicants) - and- PINKERTON'S OF CANADA LIMITED, GOVERNMENT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES AS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES, NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, TRANSPORTATION AND GENERAL WORKERS UNION OF CANADA, TIMOTHY ALEXANDER BETTGER, ROYAL OAK VENTURES INC. (formerly Royal Oak Mines Inc.) Respondents AND BETWEEN: JAMES O'NEIL Appellant (Applicant) - and- PINKERTON'S OF CANADA LIMITED, GOVERNMENT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES AS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES, NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, TRANSPORTATION AND GENERAL WORKERS UNION OF CANADA AND TIMOTHY ALEXANDER BETTGER Respondents FACTUM OF THE RESPONDENT NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, TRANSPORTATION AND GENERAL WORKERS UNION OF CANADA SACK GOLDBLATT MITCHELL LLP SACK GOLDBLATT MITCHELL LLP 20 Dundas Street West 30 Metcalfe Street Suite 1100, P.O. Box 180 Ottawa, Ontario Toronto, Ontario M5G 2G8 KIP 5L4 Steven Barrett Colleen Bauman Tel: 416-977-6070 Tel: 613-235-5327 Fax: 416-591-7333 Fax: 613-235-3041 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] CHIVERS CARPENTER LAWYERS Ottawa Agent for the National Automobile, Suite 101, 10426 81 Avenue Aerospace, Transportation and General Edmonton, Alberta Workers Union of Canada T6E 1X5 Patrick Nugent Tel: 780-439-3611 Fax: 780-439-8543 Email: [email protected] Co-counsel for the National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada TO: BISHOP & McKENZIE LLP OSLER, HOSKIN & HARCOURT LLP 2500 - 10104, 103rd Avenue 340 Albert Street, Suite 1900 Edmonton, Alberta Ottawa, Ontario T5J IV3 KIP 6L2 J.
  • 12. Liability, Legacy, and Perpetual Care

    12. Liability, Legacy, and Perpetual Care

    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2015-11 Mining and communities in Northern Canada : history, politics, and memory Keeling, Arn; Sandlos, John University of Calgary Press Keeling, A., & Sandlos, J. (Eds.). (2015). Mining and Communities in Northern Canada: History, Politics, and Memory. Canada: University of Calgary Press. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/51021 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca MINING AND COMMUNITIES IN NORTHERN CANADA: HISTORY, POLITICS, AND MEMORY Edited by Arn Keeling and John Sandlos ISBN 978-1-55238-805-1 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright.
  • Sheila Fullowka, Doreen Shauna Hourie, Tracey Neill, Judit Pandev, Ella May Carol Riggs, Doreen Vodnoski, Carlene Dawn Rowsell

    Sheila Fullowka, Doreen Shauna Hourie, Tracey Neill, Judit Pandev, Ella May Carol Riggs, Doreen Vodnoski, Carlene Dawn Rowsell

    132 FULLOWKA v. PINKERTON’S OF CANADA [2010] 1 S.C.R. Sheila Fullowka, Doreen Shauna Hourie, Sheila Fullowka, Doreen Shauna Hourie, Tracey Neill, Judit Pandev, Ella May Carol Tracey Neill, Judit Pandev, Ella May Carol Riggs, Doreen Vodnoski, Carlene Dawn Riggs, Doreen Vodnoski, Carlene Dawn Rowsell, Karen Russell and Bonnie Lou Rowsell, Karen Russell et Bonnie Lou Sawler Appellants Sawler Appelantes v. c. Pinkerton’s of Canada Limited, Government Pinkerton’s of Canada Limited, of the Northwest Territories as represented gouvernement des Territoires du Nord-Ouest, by the Commissioner of the Northwest représenté par le commissaire des Territoires Territories, National Automobile, Aerospace, du Nord-Ouest, Syndicat national de Transportation and General Workers Union l’automobile, de l’aérospatiale, du transport of Canada, Timothy Alexander Bettger and et des autres travailleurs et travailleuses du Royal Oak Ventures Inc. (formerly Royal Oak Canada, Timothy Alexander Bettger et Royal Mines Inc.) Respondents Oak Ventures Inc. (anciennement Royal Oak Mines Inc.) Intimés - and - - et - James O’Neil Appellant James O’Neil Appelant v. c. Pinkerton’s of Canada Limited, Government Pinkerton’s of Canada Limited, of the Northwest Territories as represented gouvernement des Territoires du Nord-Ouest, by the Commissioner of the Northwest représenté par le commissaire des Territoires Territories, National Automobile, Aerospace, du Nord-Ouest, Syndicat national de Transportation and General Workers l’automobile, de l’aérospatiale, du transport Union of Canada and Timothy Alexander et des autres travailleurs et travailleuses Bettger Respondents du Canada et Timothy Alexander Bettger Intimés and et Attorney General of Canada and Attorney Procureur général du Canada et procureur General of Ontario Interveners général de l’Ontario Intervenants Indexed as: Fullowka v.
  • Management of Arsenic Trioxide Bearing Dust at Giant Mine, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories

    Management of Arsenic Trioxide Bearing Dust at Giant Mine, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories

    MANAGEMENT OF ARSENIC TRIOXIDE BEARING DUST AT GIANT MINE, YELLOWKNIFE, NORTHWEST TERRITORIES. Authors: N. Thompson, P. Spencer, P. Green Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. P.O. Box 1500, Yellowknife, NT, X1A 2R3 Introduction The Giant Mine, located in Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada has been operating as a gold mine since 1948. Giant has been primarily an underground operation which used roaster technology to remove of gold from refractory arsenopyrite ore. The roasting process produced arsenic trioxide bearing dust as a waste product. This dust was pneumatically conveyed into underground storage chambers at a rate of 10-13 tons per day at peak production. Fifty years of operation have resulted in approximately 265,000 tons of roaster dust stored in 15 underground chambers. When underground storage began in 1951, it was considered the best option at the time, based the occurrence of permafrost in the bedrock. The first chambers were purpose built for dust storage in areas thought to be dry and surrounded by permafrost. From the 1960’s through to the mid 1970’s dust was placed in mined out stopes rather than purpose built chambers, however, the stopes were still located in dry permafrost zones. In 1976 the mine once again began using purpose-built chambers to store the arsenic trioxide dust. These chambers were placed to utilize low permeability host rock rather than in permafrost for containment. As late as 1977, the Canadian Public Health Association recommended underground storage as the best option. The chambers are located in the zone that has been dewatered by mining activities (water table depression) but local flow does exist in the mine workings including the chamber areas.
  • 771 FULLOWKA V. PINKERTON's of CANADA LTD. and the MATERIAL-CONTRIBUTION TEST for FACTUAL CAUSATION in NEGLIGENCE on 18 Februa

    771 FULLOWKA V. PINKERTON's of CANADA LTD. and the MATERIAL-CONTRIBUTION TEST for FACTUAL CAUSATION in NEGLIGENCE on 18 Februa

    FULLOWKA V. PINKERTON’S OF CANADA LTD. 771 FULLOWKA V. PINKERTON’S OF CANADA LTD. AND THE MATERIAL-CONTRIBUTION TEST FOR FACTUAL CAUSATION IN NEGLIGENCE ROBIN HANSEN* On 18 February 2010 the Supreme Court of Canada released its judgment in Fullowka v. Pinkerton’s of Canada Ltd.1 In a unanimous decision, the Court canvassed issues including duty and standard of care, factual causation, and the vicarious liability of unions, focusing especially upon duty and standard of care. This case comment examines, in particular, the decision’s treatment of factual causation in negligence. I argue that while the reasoning on factual causation is brief, its implicit logic helps reveal the Court’s current intent regarding the substance of the material-contribution test for factual causation. This comment is divided into four parts. In Part I, I describe the case history and facts. In Part II, I outline the material-contribution test for factual causation in negligence and review recent appellant level decisions on the topic. In Part III, I examine the Court’s reasons on factual causation in Fullowka and their significance for this area of negligence law. Part IV serves as a brief conclusion. I. FACTS AND CASE HISTORY Fullowka arose out of events transpiring at the Giant Mine, located 5 km from Yellowknife. This gold mine was first operational in 1948 and was owned by various companies until Royal Oak Mines (Royal Oak) gained control in 1990.2 At 8:45 a.m. on 18 September 1992, a violent explosion killed nine miners on the 750-foot level of the mine.
  • Potential Impact on Mining

    Potential Impact on Mining

    Potential Impact on Mining KEN SUMANIK Introduction The potential impacts of Delgamuukw on the mining industry are conjec- tural: they depend ultimately on who owns the land and to what extent the owners and prospective users are able to agree on terms and condi- tions of use. In the interim, mineral tenure holders and mining develop- ers are expected to engage in “meaningful consultation” with aboriginal peoples as a pre-requisite to “work,” while the ownership questions are being argued in our courts. This uncertainty has increased the currently high levels of risk to exploration and development. Mining Is a Risky Business The study of risk measurement in the mining industry is made difficult by diverse influences. Some are technical, some human, and some po- litical—each study is unique. Between 1927 and 1967, Cominco ex- plored more than 1,000 properties in Canada. Of these, only 78 were of sufficient interest to warrant a major exploration program. Sixty were found to contain insufficient ore to justify production; 18 were brought into production, but of these, 11 were not sufficiently profitable to per- mit recovery of the original investment. Only seven of the original Notes will be found on page 465. 459 460 Beyond the Nass Valley 1,000 properties became profitable mines.1 During that 40-year period, the company spent more than $300 million in its search for new mines. Technical risks have now been overtaken by human and political risks. These commonly include security of mineral tenure, access to land, excessive regulations, taxation, mineral commodity prices, and energy and labour costs.
  • NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate for the Indin Lake Gold Property, Northwest Territories, Canada

    NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate for the Indin Lake Gold Property, Northwest Territories, Canada

    Val-d’Or Head Office 560, 3e Avenue Val-d’Or (Québec) J9P 1S4 Québec Office Montréal Office Phone: 819-874-0447 725, Lebourgneuf Blvd. 859, Jean-Paul-Vincent Blvd. Toll Free: 866-749-8140 Suite 310-12 Suite 201 Email: [email protected] Québec (Québec) G2J 0C4 Longueuil (Québec) J4G 1R3 Website: www.innovexplo.com NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate for the Indin Lake Gold Property, Northwest Territories, Canada Prepared for Nighthawk Gold Corp 141 Adelaide St. W., Suite 301 Toronto, Ontario Canada M5H 3L5 Project Location Latitude: 64°24' North; Longitude: 115°05' West Northwest Territories, Canada Prepared by: Marina Iund, P.Geo., M.Sc. Carl Pelletier, P.Geo. Gustavo Durieux, P.Geo., M.A.Sc. Stéphane Faure, P.Geo., PhD InnovExplo Inc. Val-d’Or (Québec) Effective Date: July 28, 2020 Signature Date: September 11, 2020 SIGNATURE PAGE – INNOVEXPLO NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate for the Indin Lake Gold Property, Northwest Territories, Canada Effective Date: July 28, 2020 (Original signed and sealed) Signed at Québec on September 11, 2020 Marina Iund, P.Geo., M.Sc. InnovExplo Inc. Québec (Québec) (Original signed and sealed) Signed at Val-d’Or on September 11, 2020 Carl Pelletier, P.Geo. InnovExplo Inc. Val-d’Or (Québec) (Original signed and sealed) Signed at Longueuil on September 11, 2020 Gustavo Durieux, P.Geo., M.A.Sc. InnovExplo Inc. Longueuil (Québec) (Original signed and sealed) Signed at Longueuil on September 11, 2020 Stéphane Faure, P.Geo., PhD InnovExplo Inc. Longueuil (Québec) CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR – MARINA IUND I, Marina Iund, P.Geo., M.Sc.
  • Historical Timeline

    Historical Timeline Giant Mine Remediation Project Black & white photos courtesy of the Prince of Wales Northern Heritage Centre Aerial overview picture courtesy of Paul Vescei 1935 1957 1992 2003 • Burwash Yellowknife Mines Ltd. stakes 21 claims, including the • Tailings dam #2 is built • Explosion during labour strike results in deaths of nine miners • Independent Peer Review Panel tables its review of technical advisor’s future Giant Mine • Arsenic removal from tailings effluent commences final report • Technical advisor tables its final report “Arsenic Trioxide Management 1997 Alternatives – Giant Mine” at a public workshop in January 1937 1958 • Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) along with Royal Oak • INAC initiates extensive public communications campaign regarding • Yellowknife Gold Mines Ltd. acquires Burwash’s assets, which become • Mill processing rate increases to 1,000 tons per day Mines, Environment Canada, the GNWT and the City of Yellowknife, management alternatives for Giant Mine part of a subsidiary – Giant Yellowknife Gold Mines Ltd. (GYGML) • Dracco baghouse facility constructed to collect arsenic trioxide dust co-host a technical workshop to discuss management of arsenic trioxide • Giant Mine Community Alliance is established and holds its at Giant Mine first meeting 1948 1959 • The Giant Mine Remediation Project teams hosts a workshop in May • June 3: first gold brick is poured • Airborne arsenic emissions drop to 200 – 300 kg/day 1999 • INAC seeks approval to proceed with project description • Tailings deposited
  • The Boreal Below: Mining Issues and Activities in Canada’S Boreal Forest Region

    The Boreal Below: Mining Issues and Activities in Canada’S Boreal Forest Region

    The Boreal Below: Mining Issues and Activities in Canada’s Boreal Forest Region Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose / Context of Report ............................................1 2.0 Mining the Boreal ....................................................2 2.1 An Introduction to the Boreal as a Mining Region .............................2 2.2 The Ecology of the Boreal Forest Region ...................................3 2.3 Definition and Delineation of the Boreal Forest and the Boreal Ecozones ..........4 2.4 A Socioeconomic Snapshot ..............................................5 2.5 Major Anthropogenic Impacts ............................................8 3.0 The Mining Sequence .................................................10 3.1 An Overview of the Mining Sequence.....................................10 3.2 Prospecting..........................................................11 3.3 Exploration..........................................................12 3.5 Mine Development and Operation........................................14 3.6 Milling and Smelting ..................................................15 3.7 Closure and Decommissioning...........................................16 3.8 Perpetual Care........................................................18 4.0 Earth, Water, Fire, Air ................................................19 4.1 Earth: Land, Surface and Soil ............................................19 4.1.1 Access to the Land Base ................................................19 4.1.2 Surface Disturbance ...................................................20
  • N-2005-022 Canadian Auto Workers, Local 2304 Fonds File Listing

    N-2005-022 Canadian Auto Workers, Local 2304 Fonds File Listing

    N-2005-022 Canadian Auto Workers, Local 2304 fonds File Listing File Title Date Series Box- Access File Joint Health and Safety Committee Meeting Notes 1983-1991 Health and Safety 1-1 Restricted OHS [Correspondence with WCB and other GNWT Departments; 1985-1986 Health and Safety 1-2 Restricted Incident Reports; Meeting Minutes Joint Occupational Health and Safety Committee Meeting 1987-1988 Health and Safety 1-3 Restricted Minutes Joint Occupational Health and Safety Committee Minutes 1989 Health and Safety 1-4 Restricted Joint Occupational Health and Safety Committee Meeting 1990 Health and Safety 1-5 Restricted Minutes Joint Occupational Health and Safety Committee Meeting 1991 Health and Safety 1-6 Restricted Minutes Joint Occupational Health and Safety Committee Meeting 1992 Health and Safety 1-7 Restricted Minutes Joint Occupational Health and Safety Committee Meeting 1994 Health and Safety 1-8 Restricted Minutes Joint Occupational Health and Safety Committee Meeting 1995 Health and Safety 1-9 Restricted Minutes Joint Occupational Health and Safety Committee Meeting 1996 Health and Safety 1-10 Restricted Minutes OH&S. [Includes Health and Safety Committee Meeting Minutes] 1996 Health and Safety 1-11 Restricted Joint Occupational Health and Safety Committee Meeting 1997 Health and Safety 1-12 Restricted Minutes Joint Occupational Health and Safety Committee Meeting 1998 Health and Safety 1-13 Restricted Minutes Joint Occupational Health and Safety Committee Meeting 1999 Health and Safety 1-14 Restricted Minutes News Letter from your O.H. & S Committee [199-] Health and Safety 1-15 Restricted C.A.W. 2304. Postings. Union Meetings. Health and Safety 1995 Health and Safety 1-16 Restricted [JOHSC Membership; Various procedural memos.] 1995-1996 Health and Safety 1-17 Restricted [JOHSC Membership; Letter to ‘Goldhawk Strikes Back’.
  • 12. Liability, Legacy, and Perpetual Care

    12. Liability, Legacy, and Perpetual Care

    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2015-11 Mining and communities in Northern Canada : history, politics, and memory Keeling, Arn; Sandlos, John University of Calgary Press Keeling, A., & Sandlos, J. (Eds.). (2015). Mining and Communities in Northern Canada: History, Politics, and Memory. Canada: University of Calgary Press. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/51021 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca MINING AND COMMUNITIES IN NORTHERN CANADA: HISTORY, POLITICS, AND MEMORY Edited by Arn Keeling and John Sandlos ISBN 978-1-55238-805-1 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright.
  • NI 43-101 Technical Report and Up-Date of the Mineral Resource Estimate for the Indin Lake Gold Property, Northwest Territories, Canada

    NI 43-101 Technical Report and Up-Date of the Mineral Resource Estimate for the Indin Lake Gold Property, Northwest Territories, Canada

    Val-d’Or Head Office 560, 3e Avenue Val-d’Or (Québec) J9P 1S4 Québec Office Montréal Office Phone: 819-874-0447 725, Lebourgneuf Blvd. 859, Jean-Paul-Vincent Blvd. Toll Free: 866-749-8140 Suite 310-12 Suite 201 Email: [email protected] Québec (Québec) G2J 0C4 Longueuil (Québec) J4G 1R3 Website: www.innovexplo.com NI 43-101 Technical Report and up-date of the Mineral Resource Estimate for the Indin Lake Gold Property, Northwest Territories, Canada Prepared for Nighthawk Gold Corp 141 Adelaide St. W., Suite 301 Toronto, Ontario Canada M5H 3L5 Project Location Latitude: 64°24' North; Longitude: 115°05' West Northwest Territories, Canada Prepared by: Marina Iund, P.Geo., M.Sc. Carl Pelletier, P.Geo. Gustavo Durieux, P.Geo., M.A.Sc. InnovExplo Inc. Val-d’Or (Québec) Effective Date: February 26, 2021 Signature Date: March 30, 2021 SIGNATURE PAGE – INNOVEXPLO NI 43-101 Technical Report and up-date of the Mineral Resource Estimate for the Indin Lake Gold Property, Northwest Territories, Canada Effective Date: February 26, 2021 (Original signed and sealed) Signed at Québec on March 30, 2021 Marina Iund, P.Geo., M.Sc. InnovExplo Inc. Québec (Québec) (Original signed and sealed) Signed at Val-d’Or on March 30, 2021 Carl Pelletier, P.Geo. InnovExplo Inc. Val-d’Or (Québec) (Original signed and sealed) Signed at Longueuil on March 30, 2021 Gustavo Durieux, P.Geo., M.A.Sc. InnovExplo Inc. Longueuil (Québec) NI 43-101 Technical Report and up-date of the Mineral Resource Estimate – Indin Lake – MARCH 2021 ii CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR – MARINA IUND I, Marina Iund, P.Geo., M.Sc.