The Boreal Below: Mining Issues and Activities in Canada’S Boreal Forest Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Boreal Below: Mining Issues and Activities in Canada’S Boreal Forest Region The Boreal Below: Mining Issues and Activities in Canada’s Boreal Forest Region Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose / Context of Report ............................................1 2.0 Mining the Boreal ....................................................2 2.1 An Introduction to the Boreal as a Mining Region .............................2 2.2 The Ecology of the Boreal Forest Region ...................................3 2.3 Definition and Delineation of the Boreal Forest and the Boreal Ecozones ..........4 2.4 A Socioeconomic Snapshot ..............................................5 2.5 Major Anthropogenic Impacts ............................................8 3.0 The Mining Sequence .................................................10 3.1 An Overview of the Mining Sequence.....................................10 3.2 Prospecting..........................................................11 3.3 Exploration..........................................................12 3.5 Mine Development and Operation........................................14 3.6 Milling and Smelting ..................................................15 3.7 Closure and Decommissioning...........................................16 3.8 Perpetual Care........................................................18 4.0 Earth, Water, Fire, Air ................................................19 4.1 Earth: Land, Surface and Soil ............................................19 4.1.1 Access to the Land Base ................................................19 4.1.2 Surface Disturbance ...................................................20 4.1.3 Contaminated Soil .....................................................21 4.2 Water: Mining’s Industrial Sink ..........................................22 4.2.1 Acid Mine Drainage ...................................................22 4.2.2 Mine and Mill Effluent .................................................25 4.2.3 Sediments ...........................................................28 4.2.4 Water Consumption ...................................................30 4.3 Fire: Energy Consumer .................................................30 4.4 Air: Source of life, industrial sink ........................................31 4.4.1 Sulphur Dioxide Emissions .............................................31 4.4.3 Air Emissions ........................................................32 5.0 The Canadian Mining Scene ...........................................34 5.1 Mining the Boreal ....................................................34 5.2 Canadian Mining Companies at Home .....................................35 5.3 Canadian Mining Companies Abroad ......................................36 5.4 Industry Associations ..................................................37 5.5 The Governments.....................................................39 5.5.1 The Federal Government ...............................................39 5.5.2 The Provincial and Territorial Governments ................................40 5.6 Key Canadian Issues ...................................................41 5.6.1 Abandoned Mines .....................................................41 5.6.2 Taxation and Subsidies .................................................42 5.6.3 Environmental Assessment .............................................43 5.6.4 Land Access .........................................................45 5.6.5 Lack of Regulation ....................................................45 6.0 Canada as a Mining Jurisdiction ........................................46 6.1 An Introduction to Political and Regulatory Trends ...........................46 6.2 Increasing Public and Environmental Liability through Deregulation .............48 6.2.1 Budget cuts, reduced government presence and non-compliance ................48 6.2.2 Deregulation by restructuring ............................................49 6.2.2.1 Deregulation of Exploration .............................................50 6.2.2.3 Deregulation of mining operations (mining, milling, smelting, refining, etc.) .......52 6.2.2.4 Decommissioning and closure, reclamation and rehabilitation ..................52 6.4 Synthesis: Mining and the Boreal Forest in 21st Century Canada................54 6.4.1 International Factors ...................................................54 6.4.2 Domestic factors ......................................................56 6.4.2.1 Control Over Domestic Costs ............................................56 6.4.2.2 Land Access .........................................................57 6.4.2.3 Investment Conditions .................................................57 7.0 Across Canada’s Boreal ...............................................59 7.1 Atlantic .............................................................59 7.1.1 Overview of Mining in Newfoundland and Labrador .........................59 7.2 Québec .............................................................62 7.2.1 Overview of Mining in Québec ..........................................62 7.2.2 Case Study: Abitibi Tèmiscamingue ......................................66 7.2.2.1 Introduction ..........................................................66 7.2.2.2 Overview ............................................................66 7.2.2.3 Issues ...............................................................67 7.3 Ontario .............................................................70 7.3.1 Overview ............................................................70 7.3.2 Case Study: Operations at Placer Dome’s Campbell Mine .....................72 7.3.2.1 Introduction ..........................................................72 7.3.2.2 Overview ............................................................72 7.3.2.3 Issues ...............................................................73 7.3.3 Case Study: North American Palladium’s Lac Des Iles Mine ...................76 7.3.3.1 Introduction ..........................................................76 7.3.3.2 Overview ............................................................76 7.3.3.3 Issues ...............................................................77 7.3.4 Case Study: Closure at Barrick Gold’s Renabie Mine .........................79 7.3.4.1 Introduction ..........................................................79 7.3.4.2 Overview ............................................................80 7.3.4.3 Issues ...............................................................80 7.4 Prairie Region ........................................................83 7.4.1 Overview of Mining in Manitoba .........................................83 7.4.2 Case Study: Flin Flon ..................................................85 7.4.2.1. Introduction ..........................................................85 7.4.2.2 Overview ............................................................85 7.4.2.3 Issues ...............................................................86 7.4.3 Overview of Mining in Saskatchewan .....................................91 7.4.4 Overview of Mining in Alberta ..........................................93 7.5 The Northwest ........................................................96 7.5.1 Overview of Mining in British Columbia ...................................96 7.5.2 Overview of Mining in the Yukon ........................................99 7.5.3 Case Study: Faro .....................................................102 7.5.3.1 Introduction .........................................................102 7.5.3.2 Overview ...........................................................102 7.5.3.3 Issues ..............................................................104 7.5.4 Overview of Mining in the Northwest Territories ...........................106 8.0 Between a Rock and a Hard Place: First Nations and the Mineral Sector .....110 8.1 Introduction .........................................................110 8.2 Issues and Impacts ...................................................111 8.3 Rights and Responses .................................................113 9.0 Looking Back, Moving Forward .......................................118 Appendices Map of Mining Activity in Canada’s Boreal Forest A List of Mines in the Boreal Forest Region, Sorted by Mine Name B List of Mines in the Boreal Forest Region, Sorted by Province and Mine Name C List of Mines in the Boreal Forest Region, Sorted by Status (Exploration, Closed, Operating, Abandoned Acid Generating or Smelter), Province & Mine D List of Acid-Generating Abandoned Mines in the Boreal Forest Region E Methodology for Mapping Component F Selected Readings on Mining, the Environment and Community Glossary of Selected Mining Terms 1.0 Purpose / Context of Report The report provides an overview and general analysis of mining activities and impacts, but falls short of being fully comprehensive, particularly in its cataloguing of mining activity (other than operating mines), chiefly because the time and resources allocated to the task permitted only an initial overview and inventorying. The report provides a solid and reliable overview and refers the reader to additional resources and information sources. The report was developed by MiningWatch Canada with a consortium of researchers and authors, including Northwatch mining campaigners Brennain Lloyd and Catherine Daniel, who assembled the inventory, researched and wrote all sections except those otherwise noted in this introduction, and edited the report into a single document; Colin Chambers and Hugh
Recommended publications
  • Court File No
    Court File No. 32735 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES) BETWEEN: SHEILA FULLOWKA, DOREEN SHAUNA HOURIE, TRACEY NEILL, JUDIT PANDEV, ELLA MAY CAROL RIGGS, DOREEN VODNOSKI, CARLENE DAWN ROWSELL, KAREN RUSSELL and BONNIE LOU SAWLER Appellants (Applicants) – and – PINKERTON’S OF CANADA LIMITED, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES AS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES, NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, TRANSPORTATION AND GENERAL WORKERS UNION OF CANADA, BETTGER, TIMOTHY ALEXANDER ROYAL OAK VENTURES INC. (formerly ROYAL OAK MINES INC. Respondents AND BETWEEN: JAMES O’NEIL Appellant (Applicant) - and - PINKERTON’S OF CANADA LIMITED, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES AS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES, NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, TRANSPORTATION AND GENERAL WORKERS UNION OF CANADA, BETTGER, TIMOTHY ALEXANDER ROYAL OAK VENTURES INC. (formerly ROYAL OAK MINES INC. Respondents ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO Intervenors JOINT RESPONSE FACTUM OF THE APPELLANTS (Sheila Fullowka, Doreen Shauna Hourie, Tracey Neill, Judit Pandev, Ella May Carol Riggs, Doreen Vodnoski, Carlene Dawn Rowsell, Karen Russell, Bonnie Lou Sawler and James O’Neil) (Pursuant to Rules 29(4) and 35(4) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada) BISHOP & MCKENZIE LLP OSLER, HOSKIN & HARCOURT LLP Barristers and Solicitors Barristers and Solicitors 2500-10104-103 Ave. 1900 - 340 Albert Street Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 1V3 Ottawa, ON K1R 7Y6 J. Philip Warner, Q.C. Patricia J. Wilson Tel: 780-421-2464 Tel: 613-787-1009 Fax: 780-426-1305 Fax: 613-235-2867 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Counsel for the Applicants, Sheila Fullowka et al Ottawa Agent for Sheila Fullowka et al TO: REGISTRAR OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT AND TO: James E.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air
    Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air Canada (Alberta – VE6/VA6) Association Reference Manual (ARM) Document Reference S87.1 Issue number 2.2 Date of issue 1st August 2016 Participation start date 1st October 2012 Authorised Association Manager Walker McBryde VA6MCB Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged Page 1 of 63 Document S87.1 v2.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) 1 Change Control ............................................................................................................................. 4 2 Association Reference Data ..................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Programme derivation ..................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 General information .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Rights of way and access issues ..................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Maps and navigation .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.5 Safety considerations ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ASSESSMENT REPORT of WORK DONE on the HEMLO PROPERTY, THUNDER BAY MINING DISTRICT ONTARIO, CANADA, 2007 and 2008; April 2009; Assessment Report
    ASSESSMENT REPORT OF WORK DONE ON THE HEMLO PROPERTY CLAIM 4214923 THUNDER BAY MINING DISTRICT ONTARIO CANADA 2011 September 15, 2011 GeoVector Management Inc. on behalf of Kaminak Gold Corporation . Joseph W. Campbell, P.Geo. Roman Tykajlo, P.Geo. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Contents 2 1.0 Introduction 4 2.0 Property Description and Location 4 3.0 Access 8 4.0 Previous Work 9 5.0 Geological Setting 11 5.1 Regional Geology 11 6.0 2011 Exploration 11 7.0 Recommendations 12 8.0 References 12 9.0 Statement of Qualifications 13 10.0 Statement of Expenditures -Till Sample Survey Costs Summary 15 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1a Hemlo North Project Location 5 Figure 1b Hemlo North Project Location Close-up 6 Figure 2 Kaminak Gold Claim Location – Hemlo North Project 7 - 2 - LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Mineral Claim Information 8 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1 Till Sample Locations and Descriptions 16 Appendix 2 Overburden Drilling Management Limited Gold Grain KIM 18 and MMSIM Results on Tills Appendix 3 ACTLABS Analytical Certificates of Till Sample Analyses 27 Appendix 4 List of Personnel 35 LIST OF MAPS Map 1 Till Sample Survey, Locations and Results. 1:2500scale Back Pocket - 3 - 1.0 INTRODUCTION – KAMINAK HEMLO PROPERTY In 2007, Kaminak Gold Corporation developed an exploration play in the Hemlo area that focused on determining possible shear controls on known gold mineralization, and postulating possible extensions of the known trend, and parallel trends. Review of historical work showed that extensive exploration had been done in the target areas, particularly in the early and mid 1980s after the initial Hemlo discovery and staking rush, but also during the mid to late 1990s as the camp matured.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of Canada Sheila Fullowka, Doreen Shauna Hourie, Tracey Neill, Judit Pandev, Ella May Carol Riggs, Doreen V
    Court File No. 32735 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES) BETWEEN: SHEILA FULLOWKA, DOREEN SHAUNA HOURIE, TRACEY NEILL, JUDIT PANDEV, ELLA MAY CAROL RIGGS, DOREEN VODNOSKI, CARLENE DAWN ROWSELL, KAREN RUSSELL, BONNIE LOU SA WLER Appellants (Applicants) - and- PINKERTON'S OF CANADA LIMITED, GOVERNMENT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES AS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES, NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, TRANSPORTATION AND GENERAL WORKERS UNION OF CANADA, TIMOTHY ALEXANDER BETTGER, ROYAL OAK VENTURES INC. (formerly Royal Oak Mines Inc.) Respondents AND BETWEEN: JAMES O'NEIL Appellant (Applicant) - and- PINKERTON'S OF CANADA LIMITED, GOVERNMENT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES AS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES, NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, TRANSPORTATION AND GENERAL WORKERS UNION OF CANADA AND TIMOTHY ALEXANDER BETTGER Respondents FACTUM OF THE RESPONDENT NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, TRANSPORTATION AND GENERAL WORKERS UNION OF CANADA SACK GOLDBLATT MITCHELL LLP SACK GOLDBLATT MITCHELL LLP 20 Dundas Street West 30 Metcalfe Street Suite 1100, P.O. Box 180 Ottawa, Ontario Toronto, Ontario M5G 2G8 KIP 5L4 Steven Barrett Colleen Bauman Tel: 416-977-6070 Tel: 613-235-5327 Fax: 416-591-7333 Fax: 613-235-3041 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] CHIVERS CARPENTER LAWYERS Ottawa Agent for the National Automobile, Suite 101, 10426 81 Avenue Aerospace, Transportation and General Edmonton, Alberta Workers Union of Canada T6E 1X5 Patrick Nugent Tel: 780-439-3611 Fax: 780-439-8543 Email: [email protected] Co-counsel for the National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada TO: BISHOP & McKENZIE LLP OSLER, HOSKIN & HARCOURT LLP 2500 - 10104, 103rd Avenue 340 Albert Street, Suite 1900 Edmonton, Alberta Ottawa, Ontario T5J IV3 KIP 6L2 J.
    [Show full text]
  • 12. Liability, Legacy, and Perpetual Care
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2015-11 Mining and communities in Northern Canada : history, politics, and memory Keeling, Arn; Sandlos, John University of Calgary Press Keeling, A., & Sandlos, J. (Eds.). (2015). Mining and Communities in Northern Canada: History, Politics, and Memory. Canada: University of Calgary Press. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/51021 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca MINING AND COMMUNITIES IN NORTHERN CANADA: HISTORY, POLITICS, AND MEMORY Edited by Arn Keeling and John Sandlos ISBN 978-1-55238-805-1 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheila Fullowka, Doreen Shauna Hourie, Tracey Neill, Judit Pandev, Ella May Carol Riggs, Doreen Vodnoski, Carlene Dawn Rowsell
    132 FULLOWKA v. PINKERTON’S OF CANADA [2010] 1 S.C.R. Sheila Fullowka, Doreen Shauna Hourie, Sheila Fullowka, Doreen Shauna Hourie, Tracey Neill, Judit Pandev, Ella May Carol Tracey Neill, Judit Pandev, Ella May Carol Riggs, Doreen Vodnoski, Carlene Dawn Riggs, Doreen Vodnoski, Carlene Dawn Rowsell, Karen Russell and Bonnie Lou Rowsell, Karen Russell et Bonnie Lou Sawler Appellants Sawler Appelantes v. c. Pinkerton’s of Canada Limited, Government Pinkerton’s of Canada Limited, of the Northwest Territories as represented gouvernement des Territoires du Nord-Ouest, by the Commissioner of the Northwest représenté par le commissaire des Territoires Territories, National Automobile, Aerospace, du Nord-Ouest, Syndicat national de Transportation and General Workers Union l’automobile, de l’aérospatiale, du transport of Canada, Timothy Alexander Bettger and et des autres travailleurs et travailleuses du Royal Oak Ventures Inc. (formerly Royal Oak Canada, Timothy Alexander Bettger et Royal Mines Inc.) Respondents Oak Ventures Inc. (anciennement Royal Oak Mines Inc.) Intimés - and - - et - James O’Neil Appellant James O’Neil Appelant v. c. Pinkerton’s of Canada Limited, Government Pinkerton’s of Canada Limited, of the Northwest Territories as represented gouvernement des Territoires du Nord-Ouest, by the Commissioner of the Northwest représenté par le commissaire des Territoires Territories, National Automobile, Aerospace, du Nord-Ouest, Syndicat national de Transportation and General Workers l’automobile, de l’aérospatiale, du transport Union of Canada and Timothy Alexander et des autres travailleurs et travailleuses Bettger Respondents du Canada et Timothy Alexander Bettger Intimés and et Attorney General of Canada and Attorney Procureur général du Canada et procureur General of Ontario Interveners général de l’Ontario Intervenants Indexed as: Fullowka v.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Community Well-Being Assessment: Manitouwadge, ON
    Community Well-Being Assessment TOWNSHIP OF MANITOUWADGE, ONTARIO APM-REP-06144-0080 DECEMBER 2014 This report has been prepared under contract to the NWMO. The report has been reviewed by the NWMO, but the views and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the NWMO. All copyright and intellectual property rights belong to the NWMO. For more information, please contact: Nuclear Waste Management Organization 22 St. Clair Avenue East, Sixth Floor Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S3 Canada Tel 416.934.9814 Toll Free 1.866.249.6966 Email [email protected] www.nwmo.ca Preliminary Community Well-Being Assessment: Manitouwadge, ON DECEMBER, 2014 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY Nuclear Waste Management Organization DPRA Canada (NWMO) 60 ADELAIDE ST. EAST, SUITE 501 TORONTO, ON M5C 3E4 www.dpra.ca Consultants: Prepared By: Brady Romanson, BA (Hon), MES Research Analyst Signature: Prepared By: Celene Mariano, BA (Hon), MES Research Analyst Signature: Prepared By: Stephanie Matveeva BA (Hon), MES Research Analyst Signature: Reviewed By: Peter Homenuck, PhD., RPP Senior Consultant Signature: Approved By: Vicki McCulloch, BSc. (Hon), MES, Principal RPP Signature: Disclaimer: This report does not necessarily reflect the views or position of the Nuclear Waste Management Organization, its directors, officers, employees and agents (the “NWMO”) and unless otherwise specifically stated, is made available to the public by the NWMO for information only. The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s) who are solely responsible for the text and its conclusions as well as the accuracy of any data used in its creation. The NWMO does not make any warranty, express or implied, or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information disclosed, or represent that the use of any information would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Arsenic Trioxide Bearing Dust at Giant Mine, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories
    MANAGEMENT OF ARSENIC TRIOXIDE BEARING DUST AT GIANT MINE, YELLOWKNIFE, NORTHWEST TERRITORIES. Authors: N. Thompson, P. Spencer, P. Green Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. P.O. Box 1500, Yellowknife, NT, X1A 2R3 Introduction The Giant Mine, located in Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada has been operating as a gold mine since 1948. Giant has been primarily an underground operation which used roaster technology to remove of gold from refractory arsenopyrite ore. The roasting process produced arsenic trioxide bearing dust as a waste product. This dust was pneumatically conveyed into underground storage chambers at a rate of 10-13 tons per day at peak production. Fifty years of operation have resulted in approximately 265,000 tons of roaster dust stored in 15 underground chambers. When underground storage began in 1951, it was considered the best option at the time, based the occurrence of permafrost in the bedrock. The first chambers were purpose built for dust storage in areas thought to be dry and surrounded by permafrost. From the 1960’s through to the mid 1970’s dust was placed in mined out stopes rather than purpose built chambers, however, the stopes were still located in dry permafrost zones. In 1976 the mine once again began using purpose-built chambers to store the arsenic trioxide dust. These chambers were placed to utilize low permeability host rock rather than in permafrost for containment. As late as 1977, the Canadian Public Health Association recommended underground storage as the best option. The chambers are located in the zone that has been dewatered by mining activities (water table depression) but local flow does exist in the mine workings including the chamber areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Cautionary Statement & NI 43-101 Disclosure
    IN THE HEART OF HEMLO INVESTOR PRESENTATION AUGUST 2021 Cautionary Statement & NI 43-101 Disclosure This presentation contains certain forward-looking information and statements which may not be based on fact, including without limitation, statements regarding the Company's expectation in respect of its business strategy, the timing of an initial mineral resource and mineral resource potential, the size and continuity of mineralization, information relating to adjacent properties, exploration drilling, permitting, access to capital, events or developments that the Company expects to take place in the future, the expected results of exploration activities; the ability to identify new mineral resources; ability to raise additional capital and complete future financings; the ability of the Company to comply with environmental, safety and other regulatory requirements; the ability of the Company to obtain all necessary approvals and permits in connection with the continued exploration of the mineral properties. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, are forward-looking information and statements, The words "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "contemplate", "target", "plan", "intends", "continue" and all similar expressions identify forward-looking information and statements. Such forward-looking information and statements are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by the Company as of the date of such information and statements are inherently subject to significant business, economic
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Wetlands to Remediate Gold Mine Effluent
    Lakehead University Knowledge Commons,http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca Electronic Theses and Dissertations Retrospective theses 2000 Use of wetlands to remediate gold mine effluent Hayes, Tara M. E. http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/1688 Downloaded from Lakehead University, KnowledgeCommons The Use of Wetlands To Remediate Gold Mine Effluent by Tara M.E. Hayes (S A thesis submitted to Lakehead University for the partial fulfillment of the degree of Master of Scienee in Biology LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY 2000 ProQuest Number: 10611932 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Pro ProQuest 10611932 Published by ProQuest LLC (2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 - 1346 Declaration The research presented in this thesis was carried out by the author and has not been previously submitted for credit towards any degree or diploma. The work of others, where included, has been appropriately cited. Copyright 2000 Tara M.E. Hayes Acknowledgments The research conducted in this thesis was made possible through the financial support of Musselwhite Mine, Placer Dome N.A. Ltd.. I would like to thank the Environmental Department at Musselwhite Mine for all of the organizational assistance provided during the 1997 and 1998 field seasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvard Mountaineering 1
    HARVARD MOUNTAIN · ERING Volume I • Number 1 JUNE, 1927 THE HARVARD MOUNTAINEERING CLUB CAMBRIDGE, MASS. Foreword Contents HE Harvard Mountaineering Club is now in its third year. ..... 3 Organized in November, 1924, with some ten or a dozen FOREWORD .......... charter members, it has grown rapidly, until there are now By Henry S. Hall, Jr. Tsome thirty active members and fifteen qualifying members in the 5 IN SEARCH OF MOUNT CLEARWATER . University, as well as thirty odd graduate members, some of whom are former active members and others Harvard graduates By W. Osgood Field who are or have been active mountaineers. Active membership 'MOUNT :MORAN AND THE TETONS . is limited to those who have had at least some real mountaineer­ By Beverly F. Jefferson 18 ing experience in the Alps, Canadian Rockies, or equivalent THE LYELL PEAKS AND :MOUNT FORBES . regions. Qualifying membership was established last fall to By Alfred J. Ostheimer, 3rd enable men 'who had done little or no active mountaineering, IMPRESSIONS OF DOLOMITE CLIMBING. ....... but who were interested, to be carried in the club rolls, so that they might attend its meetings and take part in its other By Lincoln O'Brien 31 activities. LIST OF ~t[E:\'1BERS . The original idea of forming such a club came to two Harvard graduates, who with an undergraduate were camped in the summer of 1923 at the base of a certain fine peak in the Canadian Rockies, which they were keenly hoping to climb. Fortune Club Officers favored. The peak was climbed, and a year from the following 1926--27 winter several undergraduates were found who enjoyed moun­ 1924-25 Pres.
    [Show full text]
  • Thickened Tailings Disposal at Musselwhite Mine
    Paste 2011 — R.J. Jewell and A.B. Fourie (eds) © 2011 Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, ISBN 978-0-9806154-3-2 doi:10.36487/ACG_rep/1104_21_Kam Thickened tailings disposal at Musselwhite Mine S. Kam Golder Associates Ltd., Canada J. Girard Goldcorp Canada, Canada N. Hmidi Goldcorp Canada, Canada Y. Mao Golder Associates Ltd., Canada S. Longo Golder Paste Technology Ltd., Canada Abstract Musselwhite Mine in Northwestern Ontario, Canada began thickened tailings disposal in May 2010. Surface disposal of thickened tailings for the 4,000 tpd gold mine was chosen following a series of studies beginning in 2002 to investigate options to expand the capacity of the tailings management area. This technology was considered most cost effective in maximising storage capacity within the existing site footprint. The elimination of a pond for closure will reduce the risk of dam failure. Further, the non-segregating tailings are expected to be relatively impervious and saturated. These characteristics will help inhibit tailings oxidation and reduce the likelihood of acid generating and metals leaching in the long term. Musselwhite Mine is currently planning to remove the sulphide minerals from the tailings stream using a flotation plant. This paper discusses the design of the thickened tailings disposal system and presents preliminary observations on tailings deposition to date. In preparation for thickened tailings disposal the tailings management area was partitioned by an internal dyke in 2008. This has allowed tailings to be ‘stacked’ using the upstream method of construction in the west cell and the east cell to serve as a water management pond. The cold climate presents a special challenge to operating the thickened tailings system as there is very little precedent experience.
    [Show full text]