ASSESSMENT REPORT
OF WORK DONE
ON THE HEMLO PROPERTY
CLAIM 4214923
THUNDER BAY MINING DISTRICT ONTARIO CANADA
2011
September 15, 2011
GeoVector Management Inc. on behalf of Kaminak Gold Corporation . Joseph W. Campbell, P.Geo. Roman Tykajlo, P.Geo.
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
Table of Contents 2
1.0 Introduction 4
2.0 Property Description and Location 4
3.0 Access 8
4.0 Previous Work 9
5.0 Geological Setting 11
5.1 Regional Geology 11
6.0 2011 Exploration 11
7.0 Recommendations 12
8.0 References 12
9.0 Statement of Qualifications 13
10.0 Statement of Expenditures -Till Sample Survey Costs Summary 15
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1a Hemlo North Project Location 5
Figure 1b Hemlo North Project Location Close-up 6
Figure 2 Kaminak Gold Claim Location – Hemlo North Project 7
- 2 -
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Mineral Claim Information 8
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix 1 Till Sample Locations and Descriptions 16
Appendix 2 Overburden Drilling Management Limited Gold Grain KIM 18 and MMSIM Results on Tills
Appendix 3 ACTLABS Analytical Certificates of Till Sample Analyses 27
Appendix 4 List of Personnel 35
LIST OF MAPS
Map 1 Till Sample Survey, Locations and Results. 1:2500scale Back Pocket
- 3 -
1.0 INTRODUCTION – KAMINAK HEMLO PROPERTY
In 2007, Kaminak Gold Corporation developed an exploration play in the Hemlo area that focused on determining possible shear controls on known gold mineralization, and postulating possible extensions of the known trend, and parallel trends.
Review of historical work showed that extensive exploration had been done in the target areas, particularly in the early and mid 1980s after the initial Hemlo discovery and staking rush, but also during the mid to late 1990s as the camp matured. More detailed review showed that much of the target area is covered by extensive glacio-fluvial deposits (sands, gravels, clays), sometimes to depths of 60m, and also by an underlying basal till. This overburden cover has led to less effective exploration being done over the target areas, relative to the historically heavily explored mine stratigraphy areas that have abundant surface outcrop exposure.
The historical work largely consisted of ground and airborne geophysics, with some focused geochemical surveys (litho and soils), as well as prospecting and mapping. The areas of interest have had only limited drilling.
On the basis of this initial assessment of the target, Kaminak commissioned the staking in 2007 of a large property (the Kaminak Hemlo North Gold Project) to cover possible target shears, and they implemented a program of prospecting and overburden drilling to ascertain whether some windows of alteration or mineralization may have been missed by previous exploration programs (Campbell, 2009).
In March 2011, Kaminak completed a four-line geophysical program of deep penetrating resistivity and induced polarization surveying on the main body of the project property (Bournas and Daneshvar, 2011).
The program documented herein consisted of overburden sampling on Claim #4214923 in the north-east corner of the project area.
2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
The overall Kaminak Hemlo North Gold Project property is located directly north of the producing Hemlo gold mines, to the north of Hwy 17, and largely west of Hwy 614 (Figures 1a and 1b). The current project property includes 22 claim blocks consisting of 273 claim units (Figure 2).
The specific claim reported on herein is Claim #4214923, a 6 unit claim isolated from the bulk of the property, located in the Wabikoba Lake Area in the extreme north-east corner of the project area (Figure 2 and Table 1).
- 4 -
5 umink2qold2gorportion 5
remlo2xorth2rojet x votion 5 pigure2I PHH H PHH RHH uilometers 5
5
5 5 5
5 5 wnitouwdge
5
5 yntrio 5 5 5 wrthon 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
e
vine2
e2f
ine2g 5 vin v ÊÚ 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 remlo2xorth2rojet 5 5 5 5 5 5 votion 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
5 5
5 RSHHHH SHHHHH SSHHHH THHHHH TSHHHH UHHHHH USHHHH
5 5 SSHHHHH SSHHHHH SRSHHHH 5 wnitouwdge 5 SRSHHHH
rnsEgnd2righwy SRHHHHH 5
vine2e
vine2f
vine2g wrthon5 SRHHHHH SQSHHHH
remlo2xorth2rojet SQSHHHH votion
w 5 SQHHHHH 5 SQHHHHH
vke2uperior umink2qold2gorportion
remlo2xorth2rojet x SPSHHHH pigure2I votion
SPSHHHH QH H QH uilometers
RSHHHH SHHHHH SSHHHH THHHHH TSHHHH UHHHHH USHHHH STVHHH SUHHHH SUPHHH SURHHH SUTHHH SUVHHH SVHHHH SVPHHH SRHTHHH
SRHTHHH glim2RPIRWPQ ujet2of2this2report SRHRHHH RPIRWPQ SRHRHHH SRHPHHH RPIUVWQ RPIPRWH SRHPHHH
RPIUVWS RPIRWPP SRHHHHH SRHHHHH RPIUWPH RPIUWIW RPIUWHI RPIUVWV RPIUWIS RPIUWIQ RPIUWHU
RPIUWHR SQWVHHH RPIUWHP RPIUWPQ RPIUWPP RPIUWIR RPIUWHQ RPIUWIP SQWVHHH
RPIUWHV SQWTHHH RPIUWIH RPIUWII
SQWTHHH umink2qold2gorportion remlo2xorth2rojet glim2votion x SQWRHHH pigure2P eptemer2PHII w2one2IT2xehVQ IHHH H IHHH PHHH QHHH weters SQWRHHH
STVHHH SUHHHH SUPHHH SURHHH SUTHHH SUVHHH SVHHHH SVPHHH
TABLE 1. MINERAL CLAIM INFORMATION
THUNDER BAY - Division 40 Claim No: TB 4214923
Due Date: 2011-Sep-21
Work Required: $3,600
Total Work: $7,200
Recorded: 2007-Jun-21
Staked: 2007-Jun-15 15:26
Township/Area: WABIKOBA LAKE AREA (G-0620)
Claim Units: 9
3.0 ACCESS
The Kaminak Hemlo property is situated in the north-central part of the Hemlo belt, centered approximately 30 kilometres east-northeast of the town of Marathon. The property area can be reached via HWY 17 and by car is approximately 4 hours east of Thunder Bay or 4 hours west of Sault Ste Marie, which are both accessible by scheduled commercial aircraft. The southern eastern boundary of the property is adjacent to the tailings pond of Newmont’s Golden Giant mine property.
The northern and central part of the property can be accessed through a logging road (the Swede road) maintained by Black River Logging Inc., which turns off Highway 614 approximately 20 kilometres north of Highway 17. This road has been decommissioned at two stream crossing and provides only limited foot access to the central part of the claims. The north-eastern part of the property can be accessed via the Pinegrove Lake road, also maintained by Black River Logging Inc. The south eastern part of the claims are accessible with permission from Newmont Mines through their mime access road from Hwy 17, and through their gate onto the access road leading to their tailings area This road joins up with inactive logging roads through the south eastern claims of the Kaminak project up to the point where these roads cross Cedar Creek where the bridge crossings have been removed. Helicopter access is required for areas in the south- western part of the property where there is no road infrastructure.
- 8 -
4.0 PREVIOUS WORK
The following timetable of events at Hemlo has been culled from previous assessment files and reports in mining publications and technical papers.
Hemlo Main Zone In 1869 Moses Pee-Kon-Gay located gold showings near the present town of Heron Bay. In 1873, Silver Islet Mines financed a shaft on Pee-Kon-Gay's discovery, but little ore was shipped.
Nothing is reported again until 1927 when the Fort William Daily Time-Journal reported "a rich gold find at Hemlo" when Joe Lecours, the then master at the now disused Hemlo CPR station, reported assays of 54.60 to $88 per ton (5 to 94g Au/t) had been indicated by a "government analyst." Follow-up trenching along what is now the Lecours zone was subsequently halted when the assays were proven spurious.
In 1931 part of the Hemlo area was included in geological mapping of a large area to the west by J. E. Thompson for the Ontario Department of Mines. Around this time (1930) Bowhill Mines took a 225kg bulk sample from the Pee-Kon-Gay prospect, which ran 10.28g Au/t and 52.46g Ag/t.
In 1944 Peter Moses of Heron Bay discovered gold along the present ore horizon. Moses showed the property to Harry Ollmann of Bowhill Mines and in September 1945 Ollmann and L.G. Williams staked the 11 claims comprising the patented claims of the present Williams mine property. Under the direction of Trevor Page, stripping, trenching and at least 351m of drilling in 15 x-ray holes along a zone of gold-bearing pyrite mineralization returned a best assay of 4.11g Au/t. A land survey brought the claims to patent.
In 1946 Page, Williams, Moses Fisher and Mel Bartley staked 33 claims along the west, south, and east Williams claim group boundaries, on what are now the Goliath, Sceptre and Corona properties. In 1947 Lake Superior Mining Corporation Limited was formed and took over the 33 claims, with stripping trenching and about 1800m of diamond drilling in 16 holes on the "Lake Superior Shear Zone" running east-southeast through Moose Lake (now the Teck-Corona West zone). After 4 additional holes, Page calculated a reserve estimate of 28,675t grading 8.57g Au/t to a 91m depth.
From the 1950s to the mid 1960s work was sporadic. Lake Superior optioned the property to Teck-Hughes Gold Mines Limited, who agreed to drill a further 1500m. The option was subsequently dropped. From the additional work, Page calculated reserves of 81,000 tons grading 6.86g Au/t on the “Lake Superior Shear Zone”. Cusco Mines optioned the Lake Superior claims but could not finance work, and the option expired. Lake Superior Mining Corporation Limited dissolved.
In the early 1970s John Hellenon optioned twelve claims to Ardel Explorations Limited covering some of the Lake Superior claims extending east from the Williams group. Three holes totaling 229m were drilled east of the Lake Superior drill sites. Although the work improved the tonnage and grade to about 135,000t at 7.20g Au/t, the claims were subsequently allowed to lapse.
- 9 -
In the late 1970s Roy Newman staked four claims on the previous Lake Superior- Ardel ground along the eastern Williams group boundary and eight claims along and to the west of the western boundary. Copper Lake Explorations optioned the Newman claims. Bob Schaaf, the consulting geologist for Copper Lake, filed VLF and soil sampling for the western claims, but no work was reported for the eastern claims, which lapsed. In 1978 Tom Muir mapped the Hemlo area for the Ontario Geological Survey.
In December 1979 Don McKinnon staked 12 claims on the western Newman-Copper Lake claims. John Larche arrived and, released from an obligation to Schaaf to acquire the claims McKinnon had already staked, staked 14 claims on the Lake Superior-Ardel claims to the east of the Williams group. Larche and McKinnon pooled their claims and formed a partnership. By 1980 Larche and McKinnon had staked 7 additional claims. Larche and McKinnon, grubstaked by Claude Bonhomme and Rocco Schiralli, staked 156 claims in the area. Larche and McKinnon optioned the 156 claims to partners Golden Sceptre Resources and Goliath Gold Mines. Corona Resources optioned the original 14 claims, and three others, east of the Williams group. David Bell, consulting geologist for Corona, initiated line-cutting and geophysical surveying on the property.
In 1981 drilling began on the Corona property. Seventy holes on the original Lake Superior-Ardel zone (the Teck-Corona West zone) delineated reserves of 681,000t at 3.43g Au/t before step-out holes began to test for additional mineralization along strike. Corona's hole 76 intersects the main Hemlo ore deposit, grading 7.16g Au/t over 3.2m. Lac Minerals Ltd. began staking several hundred claims east of the Goliath-Golden Sceptre property and Lac acquired the Williams group. Teck Corporation optioned the Corona property. In 1982 a staking rush resulted in over forty thousand claims being staked in the general area, 20,000 by McKinnon. While testing an IP anomaly, Lac intersects the main ore deposit on the Williams group with the first hole, which returned 24.4m of 6.17g Au/t. Goliath-Golden Sceptre begin drilling on the Sceptre claims west of the Williams group, but then moved to the Goliath claims to test for the down-dip extension of the Lac mineralization. Here, the first hole ended in diabase, but the second intersected the main ore deposit, with 29.9m grading 8.78g Au/t. Noranda optioned the Goliath-Golden Sceptre properties in November of 1982.
In 1985 Noranda began production from the Golden Giant Mine and Lac opened the Page-Williams Mine on the Williams group. Production began from Teck-Corona's David Bell Mine in 1986. Combined production from the 3 mines peaked at more than 12,000t/day. In 2007 Newmont closed the Golden Giant as reserves became exhausted. Property History
The area was extensively staked during the 1980s rush, and several campaigns of work by various companies were completed. Exploration work was carried out on various areas within the current Kaminak property and on adjacent lands.
- 10 -
In October 2007, Kaminak carried out a program of prospecting and sampling. Interesting alteration indicies were found in several areas but no significantly anomalous Au or base metal results were returned from the analyses. The prospecting program was followed by a reverse circulation drilling program to follow up areas of alteration and deep overburden cover. The program consisted of 135.5m of drilling over 15 holes. A total of 35 till samples and 15 rock chip samples were collected. No significant gold or base metal anomalies were located (Campbell, 2009).
In March 2011, Kaminak completed deep-penetrating resistivity-induced-polarization (IP) surveys over 4 lines spread throughout the Hemlo Project properties (Bournas and Daneshvar, 2011). The Titan24 distributed array system operated by Quantec Geoscience was used in the survey. Several weak IP anomalies were detected.
5.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
5.1 Regional Geology
The Hemlo area is situated in the Wawa-Shebandowan subprovince, and specifically occurs in a highly deformed zone flanked by intermediate to mafic volcanic rocks to the south and volcaniclastics and sedimentary rocks to the north. The Kaminak claims lie on the northern limb of the Hemlo Synform, an east-west trending synclinorium developed within the Archean aged Heron Bay Greenstone Belt. The Syncline is flanked to the northwest by the Gowan Lake and to the southeast by gneissic rocks and the Musher and Cedar Creek plutons.
Rocks within the syncline have locally attained an upper amphibolite grade of metamorphism, and reference in this report to volcanics and sedimentary rocks is for interpreted metamorphic derivatives of these primary rock types. The core of the syncline has locally been intruded by several late Archean felsic complexes, including two listed above and also the Musher Lake and White Lake plutons. Several ages of post-Archean diabase dykes intrude the entire sequence.
6.0 2011 EXPLORATION
The 2011 program on Claim 4214923 consisted of the collection of 11 overburden samples in late May by a 2-man crew contracted from Geovector Management Inc. Till samples were collected approximately 200-300m apart along two north-south lines (Map 1) from sites dug by hand to a depth ranging from 75 to 90cm. Sample locations and descriptive details are summarized in Appendix 1. Approximately 5-15kg of overburden material was collected at each site and sent to Overburden Drilling Management Limited (OBM) for Au grain count analyses. In addition, OBM carried out kimberlite indicator analysis (KIM) and magmatic/metamorphosed massive sulphide indicator mineral analysis (MMSIM).
Till analysis results from OBM are presented in Appendix 2.Total Au grain count results, broken down into counts of pristine, modified and reshaped grains are posted on Map 1.
- 11 -
Two of the 11 samples returned Au grain counts greater than zero. Sample KGH-02 and KGH-09 returned counts of 1 and 2 grains respectively, and all grains were reshaped, indicating a distal source. All other samples contained no gold grains. KIM and MMSIM results were also not significantly anomalous.
A small amount of material from each sample was provided to Activation Laboratories Ltd. (ActLabs) for Au and 48 element INAA and ICP analysis of the dry sieved –230 mesh fraction. Geochemical analysis results from ActLabs are presented in Appendix 3 and Au assay results are posted in Map 1. All samples returned less than 2 ppb Au.
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
No significant Au, KIM or base metal anomalies were found in the sampled overburden. However, of the 11 samples collected, eight did not reach basal till but contained overlying sand, silt and/or clay material. Use of a reverse circulation drill is recommended to reach the basal till layer for effective future basal till sampling.
8.0 REFERENCES
Bournas, N. and Daneshvar, M.; TITAN-24 DCIP SURVEY GEOPHYSICAL REPORT, HEMLO PROJECT, MARATHON, ONTARIO ON BEHALF OF KAMINAK GOLD CORPORATION; April 2011; Assessment Report.
Campbell, J.; ASSESSMENT REPORT OF WORK DONE ON THE HEMLO PROPERTY, THUNDER BAY MINING DISTRICT ONTARIO, CANADA, 2007 AND 2008; April 2009; Assessment Report.
- 12 -
9.0 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
I, Joseph W. Campbell, P.Geo. do hereby certify that:
1. I am currently one of the principals of GeoVector Management Inc. Suite 312, 10 Green St., Nepean, Ontario, K2J 3Z6
2. I graduated with a BSc Honours degree in Geology from Acadia University in 1980.
3. I am a member of the Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario (membership #0135).
4. I have worked continually as a geologist for a total of 31 years since my graduation from university.
5. I co-authoured the report titled “ASSESSMENT REPORT OF WORK DONE ON THE HEMLO PROPERTY CLAIM 4214923, THUNDER BAY MINING DISTRICT ONTARIO, CANADA, 2011”.
6. I personally supervised all the field work for the 2011 exploration campaign.
Dated this 15th Day of September 2011.
- 13 -
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
I, Roman Tykajlo, of the City of Ottawa, Province of Ontario, Canada, do hereby certify that:
1) I am Consulting Geophysicist with GeoVector Management Inc., with an office at 10 Green Street, Suite 312, Ottawa, Ontario, K2J 3Z6.
2) I am a graduate of Lakehead University at Thunder Bay, Ontario, with an Honours Bachelor of Science degree in Geology / Physics (1978).
3) I have been practicing my profession since graduation.
4) I am a member in good standing of: Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta (APEGGA) Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario (APGO #0685) Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG) Canadian Exploration Geophysical Society (KEGS) Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists (ASEG)
5) I co-authoured the report titled “ASSESSMENT REPORT OF WORK DONE ON THE HEMLO PROPERTY CLAIM 4214923, THUNDER BAY MINING DISTRICT ONTARIO, CANADA, 2011” and prepared the maps that are presented in this report.
Signed at the City of Ottawa, this 15th day of September, 2011.
______Roman Tykajlo, HBSc, P. Geo.
- 14 -
10.0 STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES
Kaminak Hemlo Claim 4214923 Till Survey Expenditures
Item Cost* sampler: Patrick Sexton $1,993.75 sampler: Sarah Campbell $800.00 truck rental $712.03 meals, fuel $823.45 accommodation $678.00
Actlabs geochem analyses $416.41 OBM till analysis $3,658.49 $9,082.13 Planning and Report prep (GeoVector) Roman Tykajlo $1,356.00 Tara Sagriff $565.00 Joe Campbell $678.00 Al Sexton $678.00 $3,277.00
Total $12,359.13
*all costs include HST APPENDIX 1
TILL SAMPLE
LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
- 16 -
SOIL DATA SHEET
Project Name: Hemlo Claim 4214923 Date: May 25 and 26, 2011 Property: Kaminak Hemlo Samplers: Patrick Sexton, Sarah Campbell
Quality Clast Shape SSCO Moisture G - good A - angular S - sand D - dry M - moderate sA - sub-angular S - silt W - wet P - poor R - rounded C- clay sR - sub-rounded O - organics
Sample No. UTM-Easting UTM-Northing UTM-NAD & DEPTH COLOR S S C O Quality Moist. Slope Slope Clast Clast Compact Sampler & Date Zone Angle Dir. (%) Shape
KGH1A 580844 5404606 NAD83 16U 80cm light brown 10 20 70 good moist 3-5 sA yes Patrick Sexton, Sarah Campbell, May 25, 2011 KGH2A 580844 5404378 NAD83 16U 80cm tan 30 60 10 good moist 3-5 sA yes Patrick Sexton, Sarah Campbell, May 25, 2011 KGH3A 581010 5404198 NAD83 16U 80cm light brown 70 20 10 good moist 3-5 sA yes Patrick Sexton, Sarah Campbell, May 25, 2011 KGH4A 580983 5403985 NAD83 16U 70cm dark bown 20 20 50 10 good wet 3-5 sA yes Patrick Sexton, Sarah Campbell, May 25, 2011 KGH5A 580930 5403813 NAD83 16U 80cm tan 20 20 60 good damp 3-5 sA yes Patrick Sexton, Sarah Campbell, May 25, 2011 KGH6A 580923 5403572 NAD83 16U 70cm light brown 15 50 35 good moist 3-5 sA yes Patrick Sexton, Sarah Campbell, May 25, 2011 KGH11A 580523 5403505 NAD83 16U 80cm light brown 5 30 65 good moist 3-5 sR yes Patrick Sexton, Sarah Campbell, May 25, 2011 KGH7A 580365 5404346 NAD83 16U 75cm tan light 10 20 70 good damp 3-5 sR yes Patrick Sexton, Sarah Campbell, May 26, 2011 KGH8A 580367 5404227 NAD83 16U 90cm tan grey 30 50 20 good moist 3-5 sA yes Patrick Sexton, Sarah Campbell, May 26, 2011 KGH9A 580358 5404027 NAD83 16U 80cm grey 10 10 80 good moist 3-5 sA yes Patrick Sexton, Sarah Campbell, May 26, 2011 KGH10A 580440 5403862 NAD83 16U 80cm light brown 5 20 75 good moist 3-5 sA yes Patrick Sexton, Sarah Campbell, May 26, 2011
APPENDIX 2
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED
GOLD GRAIN, KIM and MMSIM RESULTS ON TILLS
- 18 -
Page 19 GeoVector @
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED 107-15 CAPELLA COURT, NEPEAN, ONTARIO, K2E 7X1 TELEPHONE: (613) 226-1771 FAX NO.: (613) 226-8753 EMAIL: [email protected]
D A T A T R A N S M I T T A L R E P O R T
DATE: 29-Jun-11
ATTENTION: Mr. Al Sexton
CLIENT: GeoVector Management Inc. 10 Green Street Nepean, ON K2J 3Z6
E-Mail: [email protected]
NO. OF PAGES:
PROJECT: KGH
FILE NAME: GeoVector - Sexton - (KGH-Hemlo) - June 2011
SAMPLE NUMBERS: KGH-01 to 11
BATCH NUMBER: 5449
NO. OF SAMPLES: 11
THESE SAMPLES WERE PROCESSED FOR: KIMBERLITE INDICATORS MMSIMs GOLD
SPECIFICATIONS: 1. Submitted by client: ~5 to 15 kg sand and till samples. 2. Larger clasts removed by hand in the field. 3. Heavy liquid separation specific gravity 3.32.
REMARKS:
Remy Huneault, P.Geo. Laboratory Manager
* Calculated PPB Au based on assumed nonmagnetic HMC weight equivalent to 1/250th of the table feed. Page 20 GeoVector @
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED GOLD GRAIN SUMMARY Project: KGH Filename: GeoVector - Sexton - (KGH-Hemlo) - June 2011 Total Number of Samples in this Report = 11 Batch Number: 5449
Nonmag Sample Number of Visible Gold Grains HMC Calculated PPB Visible Gold in HMC Number Weight Total Reshaped Modified Pristine (g) Total Reshaped Modified Pristine * KGH-01 000034.0 0000 KGH-02 110024.4 3300 KGH-03 000029.6 0000 KGH-04 000022.0 0000 KGH-05 000026.8 0000 KGH-06 000021.6 0000 KGH-07 000033.6 0000 KGH-08 000041.6 0000 KGH-09 220026.8 1100 KGH-10 000027.6 0000 KGH-11 000028.0 0000
* Calculated PPB Au based on assumed nonmagnetic HMC weight equivalent to 1/250th of the table feed. Page 21 GeoVector @
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED DETAILED GOLD GRAIN DATA Project: KGH Filename: GeoVector - Sexton - (KGH-Hemlo) - June 2011 Total Number of Samples in this Report = 11 Batch Number: 5449
Nonmag Calculated Sample Panned Dimensions (microns) Number of Visible Gold Grains HMC V.G. Assay Remarks Number Yes/No Weight in HMC Thickness Width Length Reshaped Modified Pristine Total (g) (ppb)
KGH-01 No NO VISIBLE GOLD
KGH-02 No 8 C 25 50 1 1 1 24.4 3
KGH-03 No NO VISIBLE GOLD
KGH-04 No NO VISIBLE GOLD
KGH-05 No NO VISIBLE GOLD
KGH-06 No NO VISIBLE GOLD
KGH-07 No NO VISIBLE GOLD
KGH-08 No NO VISIBLE GOLD
KGH-09 No 3 C 15 15 1 1 5 C 25 25 1 1 2 26.8 1
KGH-10 No NO VISIBLE GOLD
* Calculated PPB Au based on assumed nonmagnetic HMC weight equivalent to 1/250th of the table feed. Page 22 GeoVector @
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED RAW SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS AND PROCESSING WEIGHTS Project: KGH Filename: GeoVector - Sexton - (KGH-Hemlo) - June 2011 Total Number of Samples in this Report = 11 Batch Number: 5449
Weight (kg) Clasts >2.0 mm Matrix <2.0 mm Percentage Distribution Colour Sample Bulk Table +2 mm Table Size V/S GR LS OT S/U SD ST CY Sand Clay Class Number Rec'd Split Clasts Feed Org
KGH-01 9.0 8.5 0.0 8.5 No Clasts S F + Y N LOC LOC SILT + CLAY KGH-02 6.6 6.1 0.0 6.1 No Clasts S F Y N N OC NA SAND KGH-03 7.9 7.4 0.0 7.4 No Clasts S MC Y N N DOC NA SAND KGH-04 6.7 6.2 0.7 5.5 P 20 80 0 0 U Y + - N LOC LOC TILL KGH-05 7.9 7.4 0.7 6.7 P 40 60 0 0 U Y + - N OC OC TILL KGH-06 7.6 7.1 1.7 5.4 P 20 80 0 0 U + Y - N OC OC TILL KGH-07 8.9 8.4 0.0 8.4 No Clasts S F + + N LOC LOC SILT + CLAY KGH-08 10.9 10.4 0.0 10.4 No Clasts S F + - N LOC LOC SAND + SILT KGH-09 7.2 6.7 0.0 6.7 No Clasts S F + + N LOC LOC SILT + CLAY KGH-10 7.4 6.9 0.0 6.9 No Clasts S F + + N LOC LOC SILT + CLAY KGH-11 7.5 7.0 0.0 7.0 No Clasts S F + + N LOC LOC SILT + CLAY
* Calculated PPB Au based on assumed nonmagnetic HMC weight equivalent to 1/250th of the table feed. Page 23 GeoVector @
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED HEAVY MINERAL PROCESSING WEIGHTS AND KIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERAL DATA Project: KGH Filename: GeoVector - Sexton - (KGH-Hemlo) - June 2011 Total Number of Samples in this Report = 11
Weight (g) Number of Grains <2.0 mm Table Concentrate Selected Pseudo KIMs KIMs 0.25-2.0 mm Heavy Liquid Separation S.G 3.20 1.0 to 2.0 mm 0.5 to 1.0 mm 0.25 to 0.5 mm Nonferromagnetic HMC 1.0 to 0.5 to 0.25 to
Processed Split 2.0 mm 1.0 mm 0.5 mm Total Heavy <0.25 Sample Mag 0.25 to 0.5 0.5 to 1.0 to Low-Cr Low-Cr Low-Cr -0.25 mm Liquid Total % Weight mm GP GO DC IM CR FO GP GO DC IM CR FO GP GO DC IM CR FO Number Total HMC mm 1.0 mm 2.0 mm diopside diopside diopside Total Lights (wash) ** ** ** KGH-01 313.7 289.8 23.8 0.01 0.04 100 0.04 0.04 0.0 0.00 0.00 No Sample No Sample 0 No Sample No Sample 000000 0 KGH-02 697.7 664.1 31.7 0.20 1.70 100 1.70 0.60 1.1 0.01 0.01 0 0 0 000000000000000000 0 KGH-03 752.2 630.0 84.2 4.20 33.80 100 33.80 5.10 27.7 0.90 0.07 0 0 5 000000000000100035 9 KGH-04 778.7 636.6 140.5 0.20 1.40 100 1.40 0.30 0.7 0.20 0.20 0 0 0 000000000000000000 0 KGH-05 661.2 436.8 220.9 0.30 3.20 100 3.20 1.10 1.4 0.50 0.20 0 0 0 000000000000000000 0 KGH-06 805.1 651.7 143.9 2.30 7.20 100 7.20 1.40 3.5 1.80 0.50 0 0 0 000000000000000000 0 KGH-07 237.0 182.2 54.8 0.00 0.02 100 0.02 0.02 0.0 0.00 0.00 No Sample No Sample 0 No Sample No Sample 000001 1 KGH-08 846.9 845.3 1.6 0.00 0.01 100 0.01 0.01 0.0 0.00 0.00 No Sample No Sample 0 No Sample No Sample 000000 0 KGH-09 227.8 140.1 87.7 0.00 0.02 100 0.02 0.02 0.0 0.00 0.00 No Sample No Sample 0 No Sample No Sample 000000 0 KGH-10 147.3 139.4 7.8 0.01 0.10 100 0.10 0.10 0.0 0.00 0.00 No Sample No Sample 0 No Sample No Sample 000000 0 KGH-11 213.4 175.9 37.5 0.01 0.03 100 0.03 0.03 0.0 0.00 0.00 No Sample No Sample 0 No Sample No Sample 000000 0 * Values greater than 0.1 g were weighed only to one decimal place; the zero was added in the second decimal position to facilitate column alignment.
* Calculated PPB Au based on assumed nonmagnetic HMC weight equivalent to 1/250th of the table feed. Page 24 GeoVector @
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED KIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERAL PICKING FOOTNOTES Project: KGH Filename: GeoVector - Sexton - (KGH-Hemlo) - June 2011 Total Number of Samples in this Report = 11 Batch Number: 5449
SAMPLE NO. FOOTNOTES
KGH-01 No KIM remarks. KGH-02 No KIM remarks. KGH-03 SEM checks from 0.25-0.5 mm fraction: 4 CR candidates = 3 CR and 1 Ti-andradite; and 5 FO versus diopside candidates = 5 FO. KGH-04 No KIM remarks. KGH-05 No KIM remarks. KGH-06 No KIM remarks. KGH-07 SEM check from 0.25-0.5 mm fraction: 1 FO versus diopside candidate = 1 FO. KGH-08 No KIM remarks. KGH-09 No KIM remarks. KGH-10 No KIM remarks. KGH-11 No KIM remarks.
* Calculated PPB Au based on assumed nonmagnetic HMC weight equivalent to 1/250th of the table feed. Page 25 GeoVector @
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED MMS INDICATOR MINERAL DATA Project: KGH Filename: GeoVector - Sexton - (KGH-Hemlo) - June 2011 Total Number of Samples in this Report = 11 Sulphide/Arsenide + Related Minerals 0.25-0.5 mm Mg/Mn/Al/Cr Minerals 0.25-0.5 mm Phosphates <1.0 >1 amp >1.0 amp <0.8 amp >1.0 amp Sample amp Number % Misc. Prime % % # Grains + Colour Misc. Prime % Red % % % % % % % % % % INPUT Cpy MMSIMs Py Gth Spinel MMSIMs Rutile Ky Sil Tm St Sps Fay Opx Cr Ap Mz Remarks Picked Grains Assemblage
KGH-01 0.2 0 0.2 Tr 0 0 0 0 Tr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Undersized concentrate; therefore not 0.25-0.54 mm fraction: (1 gr) (1 gr) electromagnetically separated and 1 chalcopyrite mineral assemblage not listed. Main minerals are hornblende and epidote. KGH-02 0 0 0 Tr 0 0 0 0 Tr 0 Tr 0 0 Tr 0 0 0 Hornblende/epidote-titanite assemblage. Hornblende/epidote-titanite
KGH-03 0 0 Tr Tr 1 colourless Tr low-Cr Tr Tr Tr Tr 1 Tr 0 1 Tr Tr Tr Hornblende-almandine/epidote-diopside - 0.25-0.5 mm fraction: Hornblende-almandine/epidote-diopside - (1 gr) diopside (4 gr) (3 gr; titanite assemblage. 1 spinel titanite (5 gr) see 5 low-Cr diopside KIM 4 red rutile data) 3 chromite (picked as KIMs) 5 forsterite (see KIM data; picked as KIMs) KGH-04 0 0 Tr Tr 0 0 0 0 Tr 0.5 Tr 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 Hornblende-augite/epidote-diopside Hornblende-augite/epidote-diopside (3 gr) assemblage. KGH-05 0 0 Tr 0 0 0 0 0 Tr Tr 0 0 0 1 0 Tr 0 Hornblende/epidote assemblage. Hornblende/epidote (1 gr) KGH-06 0 0 0.1 Tr 0 0 0 0 Tr Tr Tr 0 0 Tr 0 0.5 0.5 Almandine-hornblende/epidote-titanite- Almandine-hornblende/epidote-titanite- (5 gr) diopside assemblage. diopside KGH-07 0 0 0.8 Tr 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Undersized concentrate; therefore not 0.25-0.5 mm fraction: (3 gr) electromagnetically separated and 1 almandine resembling mineral assemblage not listed. Main ruby corundum minerals are hornblende and titanite. 1 forsterite (see KIM data; SEM check from 0.25-0.5 mm fraction: 1 picked as KIM) ruby corundum versus almandine candidate = 1 almandine. KGH-08 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Undersized concentrate; therefore not (2 gr) electromagnetically separated and mineral assemblage not listed. Main minerals are epidote and diopside. KGH-09 0 0 0.3 Tr 0 0 0 0 Tr Tr Tr 0 0 0 0 0 Tr Undersized concentrate; therefore not (1 gr) electromagnetically separated and mineral assemblage not listed. Main minerals are hornblende, epidote and diposide. KGH-10 0 0 Tr Tr 0 0 0 0 Tr Tr 0.5 Tr 0 Tr 0 Tr Tr Undersized concentrate; therefore not (1 gr) electromagnetically separated and mineral assemblage not listed. Main minerals are hornblende, epidote and almandine. KGH-11 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 1 0.5 1 1 0.5 0 0.5 0 0.5 1 Undersized concentrate; therefore not (4 gr) electromagnetically separated and mineral assemblage not listed. Main minerals are hornblende and epidote.
* Calculated PPB Au based on assumed nonmagnetic HMC weight equivalent to 1/250th of the table feed. Page 26 GeoVector @
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED LABORATORY ABBREVIATIONS SEDIMENT LOG Largest Clasts Present: Matrix Organics: G: Granules ORG: Y: Organics present in matrix P: Pebbles N: Organics absent or negligible C: Cobbles in matrix +: Matrix is mainly organic Clast Composition: V/S: Volcanics and/or sediments Matrix Colour: GR: Granitics Primary: LS: Limestone, carbonates BE: Beige OT: Other Lithologies (refer to footnotes) GY: Grey TR: Only trace present GB: Grey-beige NA: Not applicable GN: Green OX: Very oxidized, undifferentiated GG: Grey-green PP: Purple Matrix Grain Size Distribution: PK: Pink S/U: Sorted or Unsorted PB: Pink-Beige SD: Sand (F: Fine; M: Medium; C: Coarse) Secondary (soil): ST: Silt OC: Ochre CY: Clay BN: Brown Y: Fraction present BK: Black +: Fraction more abundant than normal Secondary Colour Modifier: -: Fraction less abundant than normal L: Light N: Fraction not present M: Medium D: Dark
GOLD GRAIN LOG Thickness: VG: Visible gold grains M: Actual measured thickness of grain (microns) C: Thickness of grain (microns) calculated from measured width and length
KIM (kimberlite indicator mineral) LOG GP: Purple to red peridotitic garnet (G9/10 Cr-pyrope) GO: Orange mantle garnet; includes both eclogitic pyrope-almandine (G3) and Cr-poor megacrystic pyrope (G1/G2) varieties; may include unchecked (by SEM) grains of common crustal garnet (G5) lacking diagnostic inclusions or crystal faces DC: Cr-diopside; distinctly emerald green (paler emerald green low-Cr diopside picked separately) IM: Mg-ilmenite; may include unchecked (by SEM) grains of common crustal ilmenite lacking diagnostic inclusions or crystal faces CR: Chromite FO: Forsterite
MMSIM (metamorphosed or magmatic massive sulphide indicator mineral) and PCIM (porphyry Cu indicator mineral) LOGS Adr: Andradite Cr: Chromite Ky: Kyanite Sil: Sillimanite Ttn: Titanite Ap: Apatite Fay: Fayalite Mz: Monazite Spi: Spinel Ase: Anatase Gh: Gahnite Ol: Olivine Sps: Spessartine Ax: Axinite Gr: Grossular Opx: Orthopyroxene St: Staurolite Cpy: Chalcopyrite Gth: Goethite Py: Pyrite Tm: Tourmaline
* Calculated PPB Au based on assumed nonmagnetic HMC weight equivalent to 1/250th of the table feed.
APPENDIX 3
ACTLABS ANALYTICAL CERTIFICATES
OF TILL SAMPLE ANALYSES
- 27 -
Quality Analysis ... Innovative Technologies
Date Submitted: 02-Jun-11 Invoice No.: A11-4823 Invoice Date: 22-Jun-11 Your Reference: KGH
GeoVector Management Inc. 10 Green Strrt, Suite 312 Nepean On K2J 3Z6 Canada
ATTN: Vice President, Project Management CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
11 Soil samples were submitted for analysis.
The following analytical package was requested: Code 1H INAA(INAAGEO)/Total Digestion ICP(TOTAL)
REPORT A11-4823
This report may be reproduced without our consent. If only selected portions of the report are reproduced, permission must be obtained. If no instructions were given at time of sample submittal regarding excess material, it will be discarded within 90 days of this report. Our liability is limited solely to the analytical cost of these analyses. Test results are representative only of material submitted for analysis.
Notes: Elements which exceed the upper limits should be analyzed by assay techniques. Some CERTIFIED BY : elements are reported by multiple techniques. These are indicated by MULT.
Emmanuel Eseme , Ph.D. Quality Control
ACTIVATION LABORATORIES LTD.
1336 Sandhill Drive, Ancaster, Ontario Canada L9G 4V5 TELEPHONE +1.905.648.9611 or +1.888.228.5227 FAX +1.905.648.9613 E-MAIL [email protected] ACTLABS GROUP WEBSITE www.actlabs.com Activation Laboratories Ltd. Report: A11-4823 Analyte Symbol Au Ag Cu Cd Mo Pb Ni Zn S Al As Ba Be Bi Br Ca Co Cr Cs Eu Fe Hf Hg Ir Unit Symbol ppb ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % ppm ppm ppm ppm % ppm ppm ppb Detection Limit 2 0.3 1 0.3 1 3 1 1 0.01 0.01 0.5 50 1 2 0.5 0.01 1 2 1 0.2 0.01 1 1 5 Analysis Method INAA MULT TD-ICP TD-ICP TD-ICP TD-ICP MULT MULT TD-ICP TD-ICP INAA INAA TD-ICP TD-ICP INAA TD-ICP INAA INAA INAA INAA INAA INAA INAA INAA INAA / TD- INAA / TD- INAA / TD- ICP ICP ICP
KGH:01 < 2 < 0.3 9 < 0.3 < 1 8 18 26 0.03 3.93 2.5 550 1 < 2 3.8 8.03 7 55 2 1.1 1.82 5 < 1 < 5 KGH:02 < 2 < 0.3 7 < 0.3 1 11 23 36 0.02 4.99 1.0 620 1 < 2 2.9 2.64 10 71 2 1.5 2.70 10 < 1 < 5 KGH:03 < 2 < 0.3 36 < 0.3 2 16 51 58 0.04 5.63 10.6 560 2 < 2 10.4 2.25 25 102 3 1.4 5.33 9 < 1 < 5 KGH:04 < 2 < 0.3 24 < 0.3 < 1 13 19 33 0.02 4.58 1.2 580 1 < 2 1.9 1.89 7 58 2 1.1 1.70 11 < 1 < 5 KGH:05 < 2 0.3 12 < 0.3 < 1 13 29 39 0.02 4.86 2.1 730 1 < 2 5.7 1.54 8 67 3 1.1 2.62 8 < 1 < 5 KGH:06 < 2 < 0.3 11 < 0.3 < 1 13 39 37 0.02 5.45 1.9 630 1 < 2 5.9 1.81 12 86 3 0.9 2.54 7 < 1 < 5 KGH:07 < 2 < 0.3 14 < 0.3 < 1 7 13 19 0.01 3.21 1.2 410 < 1 < 2 3.5 11.9 5 46 1 0.9 1.37 3 < 1 < 5 KGH:08 < 2 0.5 4 < 0.3 3 9 17 23 < 0.01 3.25 < 0.5 580 1 < 2 2.1 1.88 6 57 1 1.1 1.75 9 < 1 < 5 KGH:09 < 2 < 0.3 13 < 0.3 < 1 7 16 26 0.01 3.25 2.0 460 < 1 < 2 4.5 11.8 7 59 3 1.2 1.97 3 < 1 < 5 KGH:10 < 2 < 0.3 9 < 0.3 < 1 8 13 20 < 0.01 3.60 1.5 570 1 < 2 4.5 7.59 6 46 1 1.0 1.54 5 < 1 < 5 KGH:11 < 2 < 0.3 9 < 0.3 < 1 9 15 20 < 0.01 3.32 2.0 460 < 1 < 2 4.3 10.5 6 49 2 1.0 1.65 3 < 1 < 5
Page 2 of 7 Activation Laboratories Ltd. Report: A11-4823 Analyte Symbol K Li Mg Mn Na P Rb Sb Sc Se Sr Ta Ti Th U V W Y La Ce Nd Sm Sn Tb Unit Symbol % ppm % ppm % % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % ppm Detection Limit 0.01 1 0.01 1 0.01 0.001 15 0.1 0.1 3 1 0.5 0.01 0.2 0.5 2 1 1 0.5 3 5 0.1 0.01 0.5 Analysis Method TD-ICP TD-ICP TD-ICP TD-ICP INAA TD-ICP INAA INAA INAA INAA TD-ICP INAA TD-ICP INAA INAA TD-ICP INAA TD-ICP INAA INAA INAA INAA INAA INAA
KGH:01 3.18 16 2.21 321 1.62 0.048 58 0.3 7.2 < 3 246 < 0.5 0.18 6.9 1.6 34 < 1 11 25.2 64 32 3.7 < 0.01 < 0.5 KGH:02 2.35 10 0.83 452 2.23 0.100 55 < 0.1 9.7 < 3 418 < 0.5 0.36 6.9 2.8 74 < 1 14 24.7 75 27 5.5 < 0.01 < 0.5 KGH:03 1.66 31 1.14 813 1.78 0.135 < 15 0.3 11.0 < 3 291 < 0.5 0.38 9.6 < 0.5 107 < 1 13 33.6 105 33 5.5 < 0.01 0.6 KGH:04 2.65 13 0.60 326 2.07 0.019 32 0.2 7.1 < 3 328 < 0.5 0.16 6.8 < 0.5 30 < 1 11 25.2 58 27 4.0 < 0.01 < 0.5 KGH:05 3.04 19 0.61 271 1.86 0.038 79 0.2 7.5 < 3 290 < 0.5 0.25 6.6 1.7 50 < 1 10 20.6 84 17 3.3 < 0.01 < 0.5 KGH:06 3.05 17 0.78 344 2.07 0.040 < 15 0.1 8.9 < 3 320 < 0.5 0.26 6.1 < 0.5 54 < 1 10 19.3 58 20 3.1 < 0.01 < 0.5 KGH:07 3.21 12 3.38 258 1.36 0.039 43 0.2 5.7 < 3 228 1.0 0.17 5.0 1.2 29 < 1 9 20.1 49 15 2.9 < 0.01 < 0.5 KGH:08 2.07 8 0.54 347 2.11 0.071 35 0.1 7.6 < 3 285 < 0.5 0.28 6.2 2.3 52 < 1 7 20.8 68 24 4.4 < 0.01 < 0.5 KGH:09 1.66 17 2.98 298 1.42 0.043 38 < 0.1 7.2 < 3 217 < 0.5 0.21 7.0 1.9 38 < 1 10 28.8 64 25 3.6 < 0.01 < 0.5 KGH:10 2.17 13 3.07 316 1.63 0.045 80 0.2 6.3 < 3 238 1.2 0.21 5.9 1.5 35 < 1 11 23.7 55 19 3.5 < 0.01 < 0.5 KGH:11 2.74 14 3.08 279 1.47 0.041 43 < 0.1 6.4 < 3 231 < 0.5 0.20 5.9 2.1 35 1 10 25.0 57 25 3.5 < 0.01 < 0.5
Page 3 of 7 Activation Laboratories Ltd. Report: A11-4823 Analyte Symbol Yb Lu Mass Unit Symbol ppm ppm g Detection Limit 0.2 0.05 Analysis Method INAA INAA INAA
KGH:01 1.6 0.21 26.4 KGH:02 1.9 0.26 37.9 KGH:03 2.1 0.35 6.37 KGH:04 1.6 0.28 32.1 KGH:05 1.7 0.24 26.6 KGH:06 1.5 0.24 25.3 KGH:07 1.2 0.19 28.9 KGH:08 1.7 0.28 38.5 KGH:09 1.6 0.25 16.8 KGH:10 1.6 0.24 27.1 KGH:11 1.6 0.24 27.3
Page 4 of 7 Activation Laboratories Ltd. Report: A11-4823 Quality Control
Analyte Symbol Au Ag Ag Cu Cd Mo Pb Ni Zn S Al As Ba Be Bi Br Ca Co Cr Cs Eu Fe Hf Hg Unit Symbol ppb ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % ppm ppm ppm ppm % ppm ppm Detection Limit 2 0.3 5 1 0.3 1 3 1 1 0.01 0.01 0.5 50 1 2 0.5 0.01 1 2 1 0.2 0.01 1 1 Analysis Method INAA TD-ICP INAA TD-ICP TD-ICP TD-ICP TD-ICP TD-ICP TD-ICP TD-ICP TD-ICP INAA INAA TD-ICP TD-ICP INAA TD-ICP INAA INAA INAA INAA INAA INAA INAA
GXR-1 Meas 31.2 1120 3.4 17 711 44 711 0.24 1.56 1 1380 0.95 GXR-1 Cert 31.0 1110 3.30 18.0 730 41.0 760 0.257 3.52 1.22 1380 0.960 GXR-4 Meas 3.5 6510 0.4 311 46 48 72 1.78 4.78 2 14 1.15 GXR-4 Cert 4.00 6520 0.860 310 52.0 42.0 73.0 1.77 7.20 1.90 19.0 1.01 SDC-1 Meas < 0.3 26 < 0.3 1 20 35 96 0.06 5.69 3 < 2 1.13 SDC-1 Cert 0.0410 30.0 0.0800 0.250 25.0 38.0 103 0.0650 8.34 3.00 2.60 1.00 SCO-1 Meas < 0.3 26 < 0.3 < 1 28 30 96 5.23 2 < 2 2.14 SCO-1 Cert 0.134 28.7 0.140 1.37 31.0 27.0 103 7.24 1.84 0.370 1.87 GXR-6 Meas 0.5 75 0.4 1 96 28 134 0.02 10.3 1 < 2 0.20 GXR-6 Cert 1.30 66.0 1.00 2.40 101 27.0 118 0.0160 17.7 1.40 0.290 0.180 DNC-1a Meas 91 238 52 DNC-1a Cert 100 247 70.0 OREAS 13b (4-Acid) 1.0 2150 8 2150 98 1.11 Meas OREAS 13b (4-Acid) 0.86 2300.000 9.0 2247 133 1.20 Cert DMMAS 112 Meas 1730 1890 1580 46 87 3.51 DMMAS 112 Cert 1721 1862 1288 43 80 3.34 Method Blank Method < 0.3 < 1 < 0.3 < 1 < 3 < 1 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 1 < 2 < 0.01 Blank Method Blank Method < 2 < 5 < 0.5 < 50 < 0.5 < 1 < 2 < 1 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 1 < 1 Blank
Page 5 of 7 Activation Laboratories Ltd. Report: A11-4823 Quality Control
Analyte Symbol Ir K Li Mg Mn Na P Rb Sb Sc Se Sr Ta Ti Th U V W Y La Ce Nd Sm Sn Unit Symbol ppb % ppm % ppm % % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % Detection Limit 5 0.01 1 0.01 1 0.01 0.001 15 0.1 0.1 3 1 0.5 0.01 0.2 0.5 2 1 1 0.5 3 5 0.1 0.01 Analysis Method INAA TD-ICP TD-ICP TD-ICP TD-ICP INAA TD-ICP INAA INAA INAA INAA TD-ICP INAA TD-ICP INAA INAA TD-ICP INAA TD-ICP INAA INAA INAA INAA INAA
GXR-1 Meas 0.05 7 0.21 880 0.057 286 89 26 GXR-1 Cert 0.0500 8.20 0.217 852 0.0650 275 80.0 32.0 GXR-4 Meas 3.41 10 1.71 146 0.133 208 91 13 GXR-4 Cert 4.01 11.1 1.66 155 0.120 221 87.0 14.0 SDC-1 Meas 2.82 33 0.97 864 0.054 167 0.25 62 30 SDC-1 Cert 2.72 34.0 1.02 883 0.0690 183 0.606 102 40.0 SCO-1 Meas 1.90 42 1.59 382 0.082 161 0.34 134 18 SCO-1 Cert 2.30 45.0 1.64 410 0.0900 174 0.380 131 26.0 GXR-6 Meas 2.16 35 0.65 1120 0.036 41 131 14 GXR-6 Cert 1.87 32.0 0.609 1010 0.0350 35.0 186 14.0 DNC-1a Meas 4 127 141 14 DNC-1a Cert 5.20 144 148 18.0 OREAS 13b (4-Acid) Meas OREAS 13b (4-Acid) Cert DMMAS 112 Meas 2.05 7.2 17.7 16.7 31 2.6 DMMAS 112 Cert 2.05 7.17 17.84 15.92 26.56 2.34 Method Blank Method < 0.01 < 1 < 0.01 2 < 0.001 < 1 < 0.01 < 2 < 1 Blank Method Blank Method < 5 < 0.01 < 15 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 3 < 0.5 < 0.2 < 0.5 < 1 < 0.5 < 3 < 5 < 0.1 < 0.01 Blank
Page 6 of 7 Activation Laboratories Ltd. Report: A11-4823 Quality Control
Analyte Symbol Tb Yb Lu Mass Unit Symbol ppm ppm ppm g Detection Limit 0.5 0.2 0.05 Analysis Method INAA INAA INAA INAA
GXR-1 Meas GXR-1 Cert GXR-4 Meas GXR-4 Cert SDC-1 Meas SDC-1 Cert SCO-1 Meas SCO-1 Cert GXR-6 Meas GXR-6 Cert DNC-1a Meas DNC-1a Cert OREAS 13b (4-Acid) Meas OREAS 13b (4-Acid) Cert DMMAS 112 Meas DMMAS 112 Cert Method Blank Method Blank Method Blank Method < 0.5 < 0.2 < 0.05 10.0 Blank
Page 7 of 7 APPENDIX 4
LIST OF PERSONNEL
- 35 -
APPENDIX 4: List of Personnel
Name Address Position Project dates
Geological GeoVector Management Inc. Consulting Services 312-10 Green Street, Nepean, ON
Joe Campbell Nepean, ON Project Manager, 1 Jan–15 Sept 2011 Reporting
Patrick Sexton Nepean, ON Geotechnician/Sampler 09-28 May 2011
Sarah Campbell Nepean, ON Sampler 24-27 May 2011
Roman Tykajlo Kanata, ON Reporting 1-15 Sept 2011
Tara Sagriff Kanata, ON Reporting 1-15 Sept 2011
- 36 -
579800 579900 580000 580100 580200 580300 580400 580500 580600 580700 580800 580900 581000 581100 581200 Claim Location
-95° -90° -85° -80° -75° -70° 5404800 55° 5404800 50° 5404700 50° 5404700 45° 45° KGH-01 5404600
< 2 0
5404600 0 0 0
-90° -85° -80° -75° 5404500 5404500
Legend
Lakes 5404400
Wetlands
5404400 KGH-02 Rivers, streams < 2 1 Road KGH-07 0 0 < 2 1 Trail 0 0 Claim boundary 0 5404300 32165 -claim number posted 0
5404300 KGH-01 Till Sample Number Till Sample Location <2 Au assay (ppb) 1 Total Au grains 0 Pristine Au grains 0 Modified Au grains KGH-08 1 Reshaped Au grains
< 2 5404200 0 0 KGH-03 0 0 < 2 5404200 0 0 0 0 5404100 5404100
KGH-09
< 2 5404000 2 0 0 2 KGH-04 5404000 < 2 0 0 0 0 5403900 5403900
KGH-10
< 2 0 0 0 0
KGH-05 5403800
< 2 0 0 5403800 0 0 5403700 5403700 5403600
5403600 KGH-06
< 2 0 Scale 1:2500 0 0 50 0 50 100 150 0 (meters) KGH-11 NAD83 / UTM zone 16N 5403500
< 2 0 0
5403500 0 0
5403400 Hemlo Project Wabikoba Lake Area NTS 42-C-12
5403400 Thunder Bay Mining District, Ontario
Till Sample Survey 579800 579900 580000 580100 580200 580300 580400 580500 580600 580700 580800 580900 581000 581100 581200 Sample Locations, Au Assay, and Au Grain Count Results
Map 1 Map prepared September 7, 2011 by GeoVector Management Inc.